Jump to content

User:Manxshearwater/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
Nature is essential for economic and societal function. However, [[biodiversity loss]] is occurring rapidly on a global scale - since 1970, wildlife populations declined by 69%, on average, between 1970 and 2018.<ref>WWF (2022) Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a naturepositive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland.[https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2022_full_report_1.pdf https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2022full_report_1.pdf]</ref> This loss is driven by complex, accelerating drivers that act both directly and directly. Some drivers include: [[climate change]], [[Land change science|land-use change]] for infrastructure development and agriculture, exploitation of organisms, [[Invasive species|invasive alien species]], patterns of consumption and production, human [[population dynamics]], [[trade]], etc.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6417333 |title=Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services |last=IPBES |date=2019-05-04 |publisher=[object Object] |doi=10.5281/zenodo.6417333 |language=en}}</ref> Through these drivers, biodiversity loss is interconnected with climate change and inequalities in development. This has been increasingly recognised. The loss of biodiversity has implications for [[Ecosystem function|ecosystem functioning]] and [[Ecosystem service|ecosystem services]]. However, on a broader scale, biodiversity decline poses a risk to the global economy and wider society. As a result, conservationists have called for "bending the curve" of biodiversity loss.
Nature is essential for economic and societal function. However, [[biodiversity loss]] is occurring rapidly on a global scale - since 1970, wildlife populations declined by 69%, on average, between 1970 and 2018.<ref>WWF (2022) Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a naturepositive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland.[https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2022_full_report_1.pdf https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2022full_report_1.pdf]</ref> This loss is driven by complex, accelerating drivers that act both directly and directly. Some drivers include: [[climate change]], [[Land change science|land-use change]] for infrastructure development and agriculture, exploitation of organisms, [[Invasive species|invasive alien species]], patterns of consumption and production, human [[population dynamics]], [[trade]], etc.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6417333 |title=Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services |last=IPBES |date=2019-05-04 |publisher=[object Object] |doi=10.5281/zenodo.6417333 |language=en}}</ref> Through these drivers, biodiversity loss is interconnected with climate change and inequalities in development. This has been increasingly recognised. The loss of biodiversity has implications for [[Ecosystem function|ecosystem functioning]] and [[Ecosystem service|ecosystem services]]. However, on a broader scale, biodiversity decline poses a risk to the global economy and wider society. As a result, conservationists have called for "bending the curve" of biodiversity loss.


The need to address biodiversity loss has prompted [[International environmental agreement|international environmental agreements]], such as the [[Convention on Biological Diversity]] or, more recently, the [[Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework]] in 2022. Past agreements have largely failed to meet their targets. For example, only 6 of the 67 sub-targets of the [[Convention on Biological Diversity|Aichi Biodiversity Targets]] were achieved by 2020, the target year.
The need to address biodiversity loss has prompted [[International environmental agreement|international environmental agreements]], such as the [[Convention on Biological Diversity]] or, more recently, the [[Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework]] in 2022. Past agreements have largely failed to meet their targets. For example, only 6 of 67 sub-targets of the [[Convention on Biological Diversity|Aichi Biodiversity Targets]] were achieved by 2020, the target year.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity |date=2020 |title=Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 |url=https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo5/publication/gbo-5-en.pdf |access-date=2024-07-01 |website=Convention on Biological Diversity}}</ref>


The lack of an equivalent goal to address biodiversity loss prompted the proposal of nature positive as a global goal for nature.<ref name=":14" /> Nature-positive has therefore been described as "biodiversity's answer to net zero." <ref>{{Cite news |last=Graham |first=Jack |date=2022-11-16 |title=Explainer: What is 'nature positive'? Biodiversity's answer to net zero |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/cop/what-is-nature-positive-biodiversitys-answer-net-zero-2022-11-16/ |access-date=2024-06-24 |work=Reuters}}</ref>
The Paris Climate Change Agreement puts forward a [[Net zero emissions|"carbon neutral" or "net zero"]] goal, while the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development proposes the goal of equitable human development. The lack of an equivalent goal to address biodiversity loss prompted the proposal of the nature positive concept.<ref name=":14" /> Nature positive was proposed as a global goal for nature, and the aim was to integrate it with other targets to create a direction for global agreements: "Equitable, Nature-Positive, Carbon-Neutral world".<ref name=":14" /> Nature-positive has therefore been described as "biodiversity's answer to net zero." <ref>{{Cite news |last=Graham |first=Jack |date=2022-11-16 |title=Explainer: What is 'nature positive'? Biodiversity's answer to net zero |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/cop/what-is-nature-positive-biodiversitys-answer-net-zero-2022-11-16/ |access-date=2024-06-24 |work=Reuters}}</ref>


== Approaches ==
== Approaches ==

Revision as of 11:28, 1 July 2024

Nature-positive

Nature-positive, or nature positive, refers to a goal to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030, and to achieve full nature recovery by 2050.[1] According to the WWF, the aim is to achieve this through “measurable gains in the health, abundance, diversity, and resilience of species, ecosystems, and natural processes.”[2] Progress towards this goal is generally measured from a biodiversity baseline of 2020 levels.

The nature-positive goal aligns with the 2030 mission and 2050 vision of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). However, the GBF does not explicitly mention nature positive. The goal is designed to integrate with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement's climate goals.[2]

Definition

In 2023, the Nature Positive Initiative (NPI) defined nature-positive as a global societal goal to “Halt and Reverse Nature Loss by 2030 on a 2020 baseline, and achieve full recovery by 2050.” [1] This reflects the definition used by Harvey Locke et al. in a 2021 paper - "halting and reversing nature loss by 2030, measured from a baseline of 2020." [3] The term "nature" within the NPI definition of nature-positive refers to "the natural world, with an emphasis on its living components", according to the IPBES definition.[4]

Since its publication, the NPI definition has been widely used across organisations and publications. However, a broad range of definitions have been used across institutions and by governments.[5] This led to criticism of the term as vague and open to variable interpretation. (see Controversy)

Background

Nature is essential for economic and societal function. However, biodiversity loss is occurring rapidly on a global scale - since 1970, wildlife populations declined by 69%, on average, between 1970 and 2018.[6] This loss is driven by complex, accelerating drivers that act both directly and directly. Some drivers include: climate change, land-use change for infrastructure development and agriculture, exploitation of organisms, invasive alien species, patterns of consumption and production, human population dynamics, trade, etc.[7] Through these drivers, biodiversity loss is interconnected with climate change and inequalities in development. This has been increasingly recognised. The loss of biodiversity has implications for ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services. However, on a broader scale, biodiversity decline poses a risk to the global economy and wider society. As a result, conservationists have called for "bending the curve" of biodiversity loss.

The need to address biodiversity loss has prompted international environmental agreements, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity or, more recently, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022. Past agreements have largely failed to meet their targets. For example, only 6 of 67 sub-targets of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets were achieved by 2020, the target year.[8]

The Paris Climate Change Agreement puts forward a "carbon neutral" or "net zero" goal, while the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development proposes the goal of equitable human development. The lack of an equivalent goal to address biodiversity loss prompted the proposal of the nature positive concept.[3] Nature positive was proposed as a global goal for nature, and the aim was to integrate it with other targets to create a direction for global agreements: "Equitable, Nature-Positive, Carbon-Neutral world".[3] Nature-positive has therefore been described as "biodiversity's answer to net zero." [9]

Approaches

Economy

A nature positive economy is

In practice

Nature-positive is increasingly being discussed by businesses, governments, and NGOs.[10][5] For example, the Leaders' Pledge for Nature calls for a nature-positive future by 2030 and has been signed by over 90 world leaders.[11] In addition, the Nature Positive Initiative (NPI) was launched in September 2023 to promote awareness of the nature-positive goal and align the definition used for the term.[12] The NPI is a coalition of 27 conservation organisations and institutes, and business and finance organisations, such as the WWF, IUCN, and Nature Positive Universities.[13] As of June 2024, the convenor of NPI is Marco Lambertini and its Executive Director is Gavin Edwards.[14]

The G7 announced a commitment to becoming nature-positive at its 2021 summit, saying that “our world must not only become net-zero but also nature-positive, for benefit of both people and planet”.[15] Following this, the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies was established at G7 Sapporo with the aim of sharing knowledge to create nature-positive economies.[16] The commitment to nature-positive was reaffirmed at G7 Italia in 2024, with the Leaders’ Communiqué saying that “we will accelerate efforts to decouple economic growth from negative environmental impacts and primary resource use by expanding the transformation of our economies to be net-zero, circular, climate-resilient, pollution-free and nature-positive.” [17]

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has also discussed the nature-positive goal.[18] WEF launched a Sector Transitions to Nature Positive Initiative[19] and, in May 2024, published a report that provides guidelines for nature-positive transition in cities.[20] A 2023 report on the role of the concrete and cement sector by the WEF stated that "the call for the transition to 'nature positive' has never been louder". [21]

Australia

In recent years, Australia has included the nature-positive goal in its environmental policy. For example, the Australian government’s Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment, and Water released a Nature Positive Plan (NPP) in 2022.[22] In this plan, the government set out proposed legal reforms, including to establish Environment Protection Australia and Environment Information Australia.[23] The plan also made commitments to protect 30% of the country’s land and sea by 2030 and to work towards zero new extinctions.[22] This commitment aligns with the 30 by 30 target set out by the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. To fund the continued implementation of the NPP, the government announced $40.9 million between 2024 and 2026, as part of the 2024 Federal Budget. The budget has been criticised by environmental groups and academics, including because of the allocation of more funds to carbon capture and storage than to addressing biodiversity loss.[24]

As part of the legal reforms proposed by the NPP, Minister for the Environment and Water, Tanya Plibersek, proposed The Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024 to establish Environment Information Australia. The bill defines nature-positive as “an improvement in the diversity, abundance, resilience and integrity of ecosystems from a baseline.”[25] This definition of nature-positive has received criticism because it does not include a 2020 baseline for measurable improvement, and instead leaves this to be determined by the Head of Environment Information Australia. Senior Lecturer in environmental policy at the University of New South Wales, Megan Evans, described this as “absolutely greenwashing” and said that “it is a pathetic definition”.[26] An amendment to the definition set out in the bill was proposed by Crossbench MP, Zoe Daniel, that instead defines nature-positive as “halting and reversing the decline in diversity, abundance, resilience and integrity of ecosystems and native species populations by 2030 (measured against a 2021 baseline), and achieving recovery by 2050.”[27]

Australia is also set to host the Global Nature Positive Summit at Sydney’s International Convention Centre from 8-10 October 2024.[28] The aim of the summit is to “inform the design of nature positive activities”[29] and boost private sector investment by bringing together ministers, private sector leaders, First Nations peoples, scientists, academics, and community leaders.[30]

The European Union

The European Union (EU) has expressed support for the nature-positive goal. In September 2020, President of the European Commission at the time, Ursula von der Leyen endorsed the Leaders’ Pledge for Nature.[31] Later, at the 47th G7 Summit, the EU was among member states that made a commitment to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. The EU is also a member of the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies (G7ANPE), established in April 2023. The French, Italian, and German governments are members of the G7ANPE too.[16]

The European Commission has published a number of reports that discuss transition to nature positive economies. For example, the European Commission Directorate-General for Research & Innovation released a report from independent experts about the role of nature-based solutions for a nature-positive economy.[32] In June 2024, a mid-term review of the EU's 8th Environmental Action Programme reiterated a call to member states to "mainstream an ecosystem approach" and to work towards nature-positive economies and societies.[33]

Japan

The nature-positive goal has been discussed by the Japanese government since at least 2022. The Study Group on Nature Positive Economies was established by the Ministry of the Environment in March 2022, leading to the publication of 'Transition Strategies toward Nature Positive Economy' in March 2024 by the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism.[34] The aim of the strategy is to work towards implementing the 'National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan' (NBSAP), announced in March 2023. The NBSAP includes Basic Strategy 3, the aim to achieve a nature-positive economy.[34] This is part of Japan's commitment to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

The Japan Conference for the 2030 Global Biodiversity Framework (J-GBF) was established in 2021 to achieve the 30 by 30 target and the post-2020 biodiversity framework.[35] The first J-GBF assembly, held in February 2023, announced the 'J-GBF Nature-Positive Declaration'.[36] In October 2023, Nagoya City became the first designated city to make a nature-positive declaration.[37] By March 2024, 28 organisations had made nature-positive declarations. At the second general assembly of the J-GBF, held in September 2023, a Nature-Positive Action Plan was announced. In October 2023, the J-GBF issued a press release calling on companies, local governments, NGOs, and other actors to issue and register nature-positive declarations that state an aim to achieve nature positivity.[36]

To promote the nature-positive goal, the Ministry of the Environment announced daidaraposie, a cartoon character. Daidaraposie was created by Kiyokazu Motoyama[38] and is based on Daidarabotchi, a figure in Japanese mythology. It was announced in October 2023 on the same day as the call for nature-positive declarations was made by the J-GBF and followed a call for public submissions earlier that year.[38] The aim is for the character to be used to promote the nature-positive goal, with the government allowing free use "on posters, flyers, pamphlets, pop advertisements, business cards, websites, and other media that contribute to the dissemination and awareness of nature positivity, and are created to publicize the efforts being made by all local governments, companies, organizations, and individuals that aim to be nature positive."[39]

The Japanese government is also a member of the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies, along with other Japanese environmental initiatives and businesses: Keidanren Nature Conservation Council, Japanese Business Initiative for Biodiversity, Syneco, Sumitomo Chemical, Karatsu Farm & Food, Taisei Corporation, and the IUCN Japan National Committee.[16]

The United Kingdom

In June 2021, the government of the United Kingdom committed to a nature-positive future in response to the findings of the Dasgupta Review on The Economics of Biodiversity and as part of the wider commitment made by G7 member states at the 47th summit in Carbis Bay, Cornwall.[40] The UK government later joined the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies. when it was established after the 49th G7 summit.[16] Since then, the nature-positive goal has been discussed in Parliament, including in both the House of Commons[41] and House of Lords[42] in 2024, as well as in the Environmental Audit Committee as part of an inquiry into the role of natural capital in the green economy. However, the UK is yet to make a legally-binding commitment to achieving the nature-positive goal.

Targets for achieving the nature-positive goal were set in the 2023 'Environmental Improvement Plan', published by the Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs.[43] This includes objectives for a nature positive food system and determining investment pathways for key sectors to make the transition to a nature positive economy. However, the Office for Environmental Protection, a regulatory body for environmental protection, said that the government was "largely off track" to meet the targets this plan set out in a progress report published in January 2024.[44][45]

In September 2021, Nature Positive 2030 was published by the five statutory nature conservation bodies of the UK: the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Natural England, Natural Resources Wales, NatureScot and the Northern Ireland Environment Agency.[46] This includes two reports, a summary and an evidence report. Nature Positive 2030 sets out priority actions to achieve the nature positive goal, such as deploying nature-based solutions, improving management of protected areas, and developing a market for green finance to support nature recovery.[47] The report was praised by Edwin Poots, Environment Minister at the time.[48]

The UK government has also been called on by the Wildlife Trusts to raise its ambition for nature positive development through the Biodiversity Net Gain policy.[49] The RSPB, a charity dedicated to the conservation of birds in the UK, has called for a nature-positive economy.[50] Climate Cymru, RSPB Cymru, and Wales Environment Link have called for a Nature Positive Bill in Wales.[51][52] In January 2024, a white paper was issued by the Welsh government. The paper set out proposals to introduce a bill to the Senedd (Wales' devolved parliament) that would introduce a statutory nature positive target for biodiversity.[53]

Scotland

The devolved Scottish Government made a commitment to be nature positive by 2030 in its 'Scottish Biodiversity Strategy to 2045', published in December 2022 and later updated in September 2023.[54][55] The Strategy sets out priority actions to achieve the nature positive goal and is part of Scotland's Biodiversity Delivery Framework (BDF). The BDF includes the Scottish Biodiversity Strategy to 2045 and 4 other elements: a Natural Environment Bill, delivery plans, an investment plan, and a reporting framework.[56]

The United Nations

The term nature-positive has been used by the United Nations (UN) in several reports published by its programmes and agencies. For example, the UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) published a 'Financial Sector Guide for the Convention on Biological Diversity' in June 2021.[57] It described this report as "nature-positive finance guidance" with the aim of mobilising "financial institutions to engage positively with nature." The UNEP FI also published a report entitled 'Adapt to Survive: Business transformation in a time of uncertainty' in 2021,[58] which states that "shifting towards a Nature Positive approach is the best way for business to transform" and defines a Nature Positive economy as "an economy that is regenerative, collaborative and where growth is only valued where it contributes to social progress and environmental protection."[58] Nature is a key theme for the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), described as "accelerating nature-positive action in the finance industry." [59]

In November 2021, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), and the Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD) published a report entitled 'Creating a Nature Positive Future: The Contribution of Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures'.[60] This report defined nature positive as "actions that increase resilience of the planet and biodiversity, as well as societies, with the aim of creating a paradigm shift to reduce the loss of nature, secure nature’s contributions critical for humanity, and enhance sustainable socio-economic development."[60]

Following COP15 in December 2022, the Nature Positive Tourism Partnership was launched[61][62] by the UN World Tourism Organisation with the World Travel & Tourism Council and the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance. On April 22 2024, the 'Nature Positive Travel & Tourism' report was published.[63]

Nature-positive has been used by the UN beyond its published reports. For example, nature positive food systems were the focus of a Global Summit Dialogue in 2021, as part of the UN Food Systems Summit.[64] The nature-positive goal has been discussed[65][66] by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which uses the NPI definition of the term.[67] Also, as part of its Decade on Restoration, UNEP partnered with the University of Oxford to launch Nature Positive Universities (NPU).[68] The aim of NPU is to help universities achieve the nature positive goal and encourages them to make a 'Nature Positive Pledge'.

Controversy

Nature-positive has been criticised as vague and vulnerable to greenwashing.[69][70] This is partly because different definitions have been used to describe the term across institutions since its emergence.[5] To align the definition of nature-positive and ensure the integrity of its use, the Nature Positive Initiative was launched in September 2023 and published a definition that has subsequently been used widely.[71]

Fears were expressed that increased use of the term had introduced a danger of diluting its meaning, where used too freely to refer to any action that benefits nature.[72][10] In a 2022 paper, E.J. Milner-Gulland proposed that, to avoid greenwashing, the nature-positive goal requires a measured biodiversity baseline, a timeframe, a target, a clear set of actions, an analysis of how these actions will add up to reach net gain, regular monitoring, and disclosure of progress.[10] Furthermore, in a 2024 paper, Maron and colleagues argued the need to implement the mitigation hierarchy as essential to prevent greenwashing and enable achievement of the nature-positive goal.[11]

The concept of a nature-positive economy was criticised in an open letter by the think-tank Green Finance Observatory in November 2022.[73][74] The letter raised concerns about the concept of a nature positive economy as promoting the "financialization of nature's destruction" and diverting focus from ongoing biodiversity loss.[75] Similarly, nature-positive was criticised by Greenpeace in 2022 as focusing on "saving a failed economic model" over the protection of biodiversity, promoting the "financialization of nature", and described the measures it uses (a 2020 nature baseline, net positive nature improvements by 2030, and full nature recovery by 2050) as vague.[76][70] Response to these criticisms came from E.J. Milner-Gulland, who said that "there is no solution without business – painting business as the enemy is an own goal.”[70]

Further criticisms have resulted from the application of a "net" approach as part of the nature-positive concept.[77]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Nature Positive Initiative (2023). "The Definition of Nature Positive" (PDF). Nature Positive Initiative. Retrieved 2024-06-24.
  2. ^ a b World Wide Fund for Nature (2024). "Nature Positive by 2030". WWF.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ a b c Locke, H., Rockström, J., Bakker, P., Bapna, M., Gough, M., Hilty, J., Lambertini, M., Morris, J., Polman, P., Rodriguez, C.M. and Samper, C., (2021). A nature-positive world: The global goal for nature.
  4. ^ IPBES, (2021), 'Glossary - nature', https://www.ipbes.net/glossary/nature, IPBES
  5. ^ a b c zu Ermgassen, Sophus O.S.E.; Howard, Michael; Bennun, Leon; Addison, Prue F.E.; Bull, Joseph W.; Loveridge, Robin; Pollard, Edward; Starkey, Malcolm (2022-12-15). "Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering 'nature-positive' outcomes? A review of 'nature-positive' definitions, company progress and challenges". Journal of Cleaner Production. 379: 134798. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134798. ISSN 0959-6526.
  6. ^ WWF (2022) Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a naturepositive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland.https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2022full_report_1.pdf
  7. ^ IPBES (2019-05-04). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Report). [object Object]. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6417333.
  8. ^ Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2020). "Global Biodiversity Outlook 5" (PDF). Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  9. ^ Graham, Jack (2022-11-16). "Explainer: What is 'nature positive'? Biodiversity's answer to net zero". Reuters. Retrieved 2024-06-24.
  10. ^ a b c Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2022-08-08). "Don't dilute the term Nature Positive". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 6 (9): 1243–1244. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01845-5. ISSN 2397-334X.
  11. ^ a b Maron, Martine; Quétier, Fabien; Sarmiento, Mariana; ten Kate, Kerry; Evans, Megan C.; Bull, Joseph W.; Jones, Julia P. G.; zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E.; Milner-Gulland, E. J.; Brownlie, Susie; Treweek, Jo; von Hase, Amrei (2023-09-21). "'Nature positive' must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8 (1): 14–17. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2. ISSN 2397-334X.
  12. ^ Cottam, Bryony (2024-06-25). "Nature positive economy on the horizon, but businesses struggle to measure impact". Geographical. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  13. ^ Nature Positive Initiative (2024-06-26). "A GLOBAL GOAL FOR NATURE - Nature Positive by 2030". Nature Positive Initiative. Retrieved 2024-06-24.
  14. ^ "Meet the Secretariat Team - Nature Positive". Nature Positive. 2024-06-27. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  15. ^ Cabinet Office (2021-07-12). "Policy Paper - G7 2030 Nature Compact". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  16. ^ a b c d G7 (2024-06-26). "G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies". G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies. Retrieved 2024-06-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ G7 Italia (2024-06-14). "Apulia G7 Leaders' Communiqué" (PDF). G7 Italia. Retrieved 2024-06-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ Holdorf, Diane (2021-06-23). "What is 'nature positive' and why is it the key to our future?". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  19. ^ World Economic Forum (2023-09-12). "Nature Positive Industry Sector Transitions". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  20. ^ World Economic Forum (2024-05-22). "Nature Positive: Guidelines for the Transition in Cities - INSIGHT REPORT" (PDF). World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  21. ^ World Economic Forum (2023-09-12). "Nature Positive: Role of the Cement and Concrete Sector - INSIGHT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2023" (PDF). Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  22. ^ a b DCCEEW, (2022), “Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business”, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/nature-positive-plan.pdf
  23. ^ DCCEEW (2024-04-16). "Progressing our Nature Positive law reforms". Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Environment, Energy, and Water. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  24. ^ Evans; et al. (2024-05-17). "Threatened species have declined 2% a year since 2000. Nature positive? Far from it". The Conversation. Retrieved 2024-06-26. {{cite news}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help)
  25. ^ Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. "Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024". Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 26/06/2024. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  26. ^ Morton, Adam (04/06/2024). "Labor has adopted its own 'nature positive' approach to the environment. But is it just a 'snazzy slogan'?". The Guardian. Retrieved 26/06/2024. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |access-date= and |date= (help)
  27. ^ The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia (26/06/2024). "Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024". Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 26/06/2024. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= and |date= (help)
  28. ^ Visentin, Lisa (26/08/2023). "Sydney beats rival bids to host global nature summit". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 26/06/2024. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |access-date= and |date= (help)
  29. ^ IISD, SDG Knowledge Hub (2024-06-26). "Global Nature Positive Summit 2024". IISD SDG Knowledge Hub. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  30. ^ DCCEEW (2024-06-25). "The Global Nature Positive Summit 2024". Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment, and Water. Retrieved 2024-06-25.
  31. ^ "The Leaders' Pledge for Nature: United to reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 for Sustainable Development | EEAS". www.eeas.europa.eu. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  32. ^ European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, (2022). The vital role of nature-based solutions in a nature positive economy, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/307761
  33. ^ Council of the European Union, General Secretary of the Council (2024-06-17). "OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS - The 8th Environmental Action Programme Mid-term Review - The way forward to a green and just transition for a sustainable Europe". Consilium, European Union. Archived from the original on 2024-06-19. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  34. ^ a b Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2024-03-29). "Publication of Transition Strategies toward Nature Positive Economy". Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  35. ^ "J-GBFについて". Japan GBF 2030. 2024-06-26. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  36. ^ a b Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2023-10-13). "2030生物多様性枠組実現日本会議（J-GBF）による「ネイチャーポジティブ宣言」の呼びかけについて". Ministry of the Environment. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  37. ^ NTV NEWS (2024-03-13). "アプリで身近な"いきもの"集め！楽しみながら生物多様性の大切さを学ぶ　名古屋市". NTV NEWS NNN. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  38. ^ a b Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2023-10-13). "「ネイチャーポジティブ」イメージキャラクター及び愛称を決定しました。". Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  39. ^ Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2023-10-13). "ネイチャーポジティブキャラクター「だいだらポジー」". Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  40. ^ "Government commits to 'nature-positive' future in response to Dasgupta review". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  41. ^ UK Parliament, Hansard (2024-05-15). "Biodiversity Loss". UK Parliament. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  42. ^ UK Parliament, Hansard (2024-05-09). "Skills: Importance for the UK Economy and Quality of Life". UK Parliament. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  43. ^ "Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 Published - UK Plant Health Information Portal". planthealthportal.defra.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  44. ^ "Government remains largely off track to meet its environmental ambitions, finds OEP in annual progress report | Office for Environmental Protection". www.theoep.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  45. ^ George, Sarah (2024-01-18). "Environmental Improvement Plan: UK Government making scant progress one year on, watchdog warns". edie. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  46. ^ "Nature Positive 2030 | JNCC - Adviser to Government on Nature Conservation". jncc.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  47. ^ Brotherton P., Anderson, H., Galbraith, C., Isaac, D., Lawton, J., Lewis, M., Mainwaring-Evans, T., McGuckin, S., Ormerod, S., Osowska, F., Sizeland, P., Stuart, E., Walmsley, C., Waters, R. & Wilkinson, S. (2021) Nature Positive 2030 – Evidence Report. JNCC, Peterborough. ISBN: 978-1- 86107-635-9
  48. ^ "Poots praises UK Nature Positive 2030 Report". DAERA. 2021-10-05. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  49. ^ "UK Government must raise ambition for nature positive development say The Wildlife Trusts | The Wildlife Trusts". www.wildlifetrusts.org. 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  50. ^ "Building a Nature Positive Economy". rspb.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  51. ^ "On our way to a Nature Positive Wales - RSPB Cymru Blog - We love Wales! - The RSPB Community". community.rspb.org.uk. 2024-01-30. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  52. ^ Cyswllt Amgylchedd Cymru, Wales Environment Link (2024-05-30). "The need for a 'Nature Positive' Bill in Wales" (PDF). Senedd Wales. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  53. ^ Welsh Government, Llwydraeth Cymru (2024-01-30). "Consultation on the White Paper - Securing a Sustainable Future Environmental Principles, Governance and Biodiversity targets for a Greener Wales" (PDF). Welsh Government. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  54. ^ "A nature positive Scotland". www.gov.scot. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  55. ^ "Supporting documents". www.gov.scot. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  56. ^ Environment and Forestry Directorate, (2023), 'Scottish Biodiversity Strategy to 2045 Tackling the Nature Emergency in Scotland', The Scottish Government, https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2022/12/scottish-biodiversity-strategy-2045-tackling-nature-emergency-scotland/documents/scottish-biodiversity-strategy-2045-tackling-nature-emergency-scotland/scottish-biodiversity-strategy-2045-tackling-nature-emergency-scotland/govscot%3Adocument/scottish-biodiversity-strategy-2045-tackling-nature-emergency-scotland.pdf, Scottish Government, Riaghaltas na h-Alba
  57. ^ SCBD, BfN, FfB, PRI, (2021), 'FINANCIAL SECTOR GUIDE FOR THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY KEY ACTIONS FOR NATURE | 3', UNEP, https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/8e24/f151/326b69024f014a8fb9684a8d/cbd-financial-sector-guide-f-en.pdf
  58. ^ a b United Nations Environment Programme (2021). Adapt to Survive: Business transformation in a time of uncertainty. UNEP, Nairobi
  59. ^ UN Environment Programme, Finance Initiative (2024-06-26). "Nature". UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  60. ^ a b UNDP, SCBD & UNEP-WCMC (2021). Creating a Nature-Positive Future: The contribution of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. UNDP: New York, NY.
  61. ^ "The World Travel & Tourism Council Announce Collaboration with UNWTO and Sustainable Hospitality Alliance at COP15". www.unwto.org. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  62. ^ "Why 'nature positive travel' is trending for 2023". euronews. 2022-12-31. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  63. ^ "A United Vision for Nature - 'Nature Positive' Report Marks New Collaborative Era in Travel & Tourism". www.unwto.org. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  64. ^ Nations, United. "Global Summit Dialogue on nature positive food systems highlights food systems impact on the environment". United Nations. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  65. ^ Owen-Burge, Charlotte (2023-06-12). "The Race is On: Net Zero & Nature Positive for Climate Action". Climate Champions. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  66. ^ Owen-Burge, Charlotte (2023-09-29). "Every sector must play their part in contributing towards a nature-positive future. Here's how". Climate Champions. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  67. ^ "Nature Positive for Climate Action". Climate Champions. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  68. ^ "Launching the Nature Positive Universities Alliance". UN Decade on Restoration. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  69. ^ Graham, Jack. "Conservationists push 'nature positive' as biodiversity's net zero | Context". www.context.news. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  70. ^ a b c Weston, Phoebe; Greenfield, Patrick (2022-12-13). "What does 'nature positive' mean – and can it rally support to stop biodiversity loss?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  71. ^ "Nature Positive Initiative launches to promote the integrity and implementation of the Global Goal for Nature – WBCSD". www.wbcsd.org. 2023-09-06. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  72. ^ Maron, Martine; Evans, Megan C.; Ermgassen, Sophus zu (2023-09-21). "'Nature positive' isn't just planting a few trees – it's actually stopping the damage we do". The Conversation. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  73. ^ "Over 100 experts oppose 'Nature Positive Fund' in open letter to UN before COP15". www.downtoearth.org.in. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  74. ^ gfobs (2022-11-04). "Open letter: 119 experts call to protect nature from the "nature positive economy"". Green Finance Observatory. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  75. ^ Green Finance Observatory (2022) 'NATURE MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THE “NATURE POSITIVE ECONOMY” – OPEN LETTER TO THE WWF, WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY & EUROPEAN COMMISSION', Green Finance Observatory, https://greenfinanceobservatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/openletternaturepositive-final-3.pdf
  76. ^ "What is wrong with "Nature Positive"?". Greenpeace International. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  77. ^ "Perspectives on Nature Positive". GYBN. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Manxshearwater/sandbox&oldid=1231997952"