User talk:DerHexer/archive01

Your Help

I noticed you reversed some vandalism on Keenan Wellar I came across some very nasty stuff today on that page and did my best to fix it up. There was also some vandalism by I am sure the same person on LiveWorkPlay which leads me to believe there is some personal vendetta sort of thing going on since the pages are connected. I'm new to this and not sure how to monitor/correct without just checking every day.

My Edit Was To Prevent Vandalism

My edits to the Roger Billings article are to restore valuable content that has been developed over several years. The emotional attacks of recent edits are clear attempts at character assasination and are damaging to Wikipedia. It would be better if you would help protect this valuable and well established collection of information. Firewriter 13:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay. Could you use the next time the edit summary? Thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 22:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Please allow me to clean the references section in C++

Pls hold till I finish. Please don't revert the changes. The page is looking ugly Jayaram Ganapathy

Okay. It looked like vandalism without mentioning anything in the edit summary. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 11:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Your Edit

As a veteran ok Wikipedia, I must warn you your revert of my edit was unwarranted. There WILL be consquences. --125.238.29.27 11:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Why do you vandalize user's pages? TheWizard 11:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

What kind of Wikipeidan are you? You call a vandalism warning vadalism? --125.238.29.27 11:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Blanking a page, yes. Use the discussion site or WP:AIV. TheWizard 11:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

The phrase "Listen to me your moronic pit of ignorance," looked like a personal attack. Leafyplant 11:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

It was merely freindly banter. Please don't overreact. And please don't put words in my mouth. I said "...YOU moronic..." as opposed to "...YOUR moronic..."

no, check your diff here [[1]] Leafyplant 12:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, this is regarding Daniel Smith's Wikipedia article. I am terribly sorry about whiping out the article--it was an honest mistake. The word "Buckee" (something like that) was typed all over the page, so I just thought I would delete it. Sorry for the mistake. I'm not even sure if I am supposed to write my apology here. I am new to this whole thing. Once again, sorry.

Careful!

Hi there - Just noticed your revert on Raymond Lee Oyler... I think it might have been more appropriate to delete the unsourced information rather than just rollback and accuse the author of vandalism... it seems they didn't know how to remove it themselves. MackSalmon 00:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

It's vandalism 'though it might be correct. Somebody who watches the article will correct it then. My "job" is it to revert vandalism, and this is vandalism. Or do you thing, it would be better to have this in the article? I don't think so. Good night, TheWizard 00:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

ACK. That's why there are talk pages. --Complex (de) 00:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

That's true, I only mention this because WP policy states that unsubstantiated biographical information should be removed - I don't see a sourcing for that info, and combined with that request I thought it inappropriate to accuse that author of vandalism - if they knew how to use a talk page I assume they would have done. Just a point of order, that's all. MackSalmon 15:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Guardian angel

Thank you for reverting vandalism in my user page. --Meno25 07:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! TheWizard 08:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Ditto from me. Thank you for the very speedy reverts of the vandalism to my user page! --Bonadea 10:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

On de.wp I would be faster. ;) TheWizard 10:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from me too. First bit of vandalism on my page. - Ctbolt 11:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't you have vandal fighters here? On de.wp we have a huge community of people who revert vandalism. TheWizard 11:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Guten Tag

Guten Tag Herr Wizzard.

Wie Gehts?

Ich auch bin ein Vandal Fighter.

Ich WP:VF Gebrauch.

Mine deutsch is nicht gut, Entschuldigung.

Auf Wiedersehen Leafyplant 12:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm fine, nice to ask. I use the VF (now for de, en and es), too. It's no problem to speak English, I hope you understand me a bit. :) TheWizard (Talk) 12:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Your english is perfect, I was just trying to remember the German I learned in gradeschool. It turns out that I dont remember much.Leafyplant 12:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I understood it and that counts at all. TheWizard (Talk) 13:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Angel's Egg Vandal

Ok, the vandal on the Angel's Egg page has pulled alot of stunts in the past. How do we get someone to block them? Tech43 17:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV I think or any sysop. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 17:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

For reverting the vandalism on my user page. - TexMurphy 17:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. —TheWizard (Talk) 17:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Bokurano

You reverted this edit, where someone was creating a new page for the characters from the show as opposed to keeping them all in the main article. Just be careful in the future. Leebo ^T/C 18:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

It looked like vandalism without commenting it on the edit summary. Nevertheless, according to the GNU FDL it's against the copyright separating a page without mentioning the main editors. It would be nice, if you could report it on the correct site. I'm new on en.wp and don't yet know all your pages. ;) Greetings and thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 18:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You know what, you're right, about the GFDL. I'll have to research how page separations by characters are done. Leebo ^T/C 18:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Fine. On de.wp I delete the seperated page, revert the user in the main article and tell him, where he can find informations about the GNU FDL and so on. I think it's here the same. :) Thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 18:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I was referred to Wikipedia:Summary style#Other specifics, which states that it is okay to split up an article if the split between the articles is properly noted in the edit summary. I have done this for the articles in question. Sorry for the confusion :P Leebo ^T/C 19:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

On de.wp we have to write the complete history and article into the new one saving it. Then we delete everything but the text which should be separated and copy the history of the main article into the talk page. Thank you, —TheWizard (Talk) 19:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandal patrol!

Great job with the vandal reversion on the Thomas Edison article. The time stamp shows reverts the same minute as the vandalism, which spoils all the fun of the little scholars sitting in their school's computer lab. How does the bot know a vandal edit from a good edit, or do you sit and watch certain articles 24/7? Edison 20:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm real using WP:VF in combination with WP:TW, having vacation from the university and made a lot of reverts in de.wp. ;) And I would like to help here, too. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 21:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandal patrol

Hello TheWizard! On my watchlist I've seen that you are doing some fast vandal reversing. But I've also seen that on some articles you just reverted one edit by a vandal leaving the prior edits of this vandal unreverted e.g. International Space Station, maybe a problem with your configuration of TW? Anyway thanks for the good work and happy editing! --VirtualDelight 21:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your compliment. TW has—I think so—four reverts. There I used the faster one, which just reverts one version. Next time I should use the rollback buttons. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 21:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For the revert to my user page. J Milburn 21:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. —TheWizard (Talk) 21:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop

It is not against the guidelines to delete the content on one's own talk page, so please stop reversing my deletions. I have already made a report about all the reversions on the admin board, and they also point out that it is not against the rules.67.163.193.239 22:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay. —TheWizard (Talk) 22:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey Luv

The name of the song is actually "Hey Luv (Anything)". What's wrong with redirecting the page? What would you rather have me do? MrBlondNYC 09:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. You should move it, otherwise you are against the copyrights. Thanks, —TheWizard (Talk) 09:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Help

Who do you think will win the MLB MVP??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.224.177 (talk)

I don't know. —TheWizard (Talk) 21:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandal Whacking Stick

Here's a nifty flail for being an utter speed demon on Twinkle. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. Twinkle is nice and fast. Greetings, —TheWizard (Talk) 21:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for reverting my user page! Caster23 23:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

User: shark kid

Why did you erase the link on my friend Ian's page, user:shark kid? I wasn't spamming, it was something I told him about and he wanted the link! It's cruel to erase that! Mind your own business!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by BeaverWithChainsaw (talk • contribs) 09:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

I could not know this. Use the edit summary or, even better, the talk page. Nevertheless, please sign your posts. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 09:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the quick revert on my user page. --Onorem 11:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Catlin Gabel School

You reverted someone elses attempt to clean up vandalism on the Catlin Gabel School article. The teacher descriptions that referred to hellfire and immortality were clearly pranks, and removing them is not vandalism. 192.147.239.1 17:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. It looked like vandalism without mentioning anything in the edit summary. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't Vandalize Hawaii.

I didn't vandalize the Hawaii topic. i was only deleting the vandlism that was there.[ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.83.88.146 (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

Sorry. I was wrong. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)