Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Norprobr/Archive: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 126: Line 126:
*{{moreinfo}} - {{U|Skitash}}, you must present evidence in the form of comparison diffs between Fr4you and blocked socks. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 15:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
*{{moreinfo}} - {{U|Skitash}}, you must present evidence in the form of comparison diffs between Fr4you and blocked socks. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 15:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
*Fr4you is confirmed to Movaigonel at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Movaigonel]]. Closing. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 14:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
*Fr4you is confirmed to Movaigonel at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Movaigonel]]. Closing. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 14:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
===22 October 2023===

====Suspected sockpuppets====
{{sock list|1=Bobhhik|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed -->

Notice how Bobhhik's user page is similar to Norprobr's userpages ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Norprobr&oldid=1126193306 the first evidence is a direct threat to AussieWikiDan because he removed a anti-Israel flag], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Norprobr&oldid=991817586 second evidence] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Norprobr&oldid=1157861810 third evidence]) and this user edits to any Hispanic-related articles especially those related to the [[Dominican Republic]]. [[User:SpinnerLaserzthe2nd|SpinnerLaserzthe2nd]] ([[User talk:SpinnerLaserzthe2nd|talk]]) 12:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>

You may noticed that the similarities with Norprobr's edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Norprobr&target=Norprobr&offset=&limit=500) and Bobbhik's edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Bobhhik&target=Bobhhik&offset=&limit=500) when it comes to the Dominican Republic-related articles.

This user also removed edits regarding Brazil's role in the [[Angolan Civil War]] despite the fact that UNITA had confirmed that Brazil had supported the MPLA (https://irp.fas.org/world/para/docs/unita/en0510991.htm). You can see the comparisons (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angolan_Civil_War&diff=prev&oldid=1181319729 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angolan_Civil_War&diff=prev&oldid=1151029001).

Like Norprobr, Bobbhik was also involved in an edit war with an IP on the [[Santo Domingo]] article in August of this year (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1169882173, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1170793377, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1170866353 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1170875045). Yoshi24517 had warned both this user and the IP. I know this may not meet the 3RR criteria but please take a look at it.

====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
*{{moreinfo}} - {{U|SpinnerLaserzthe2nd}}, as I noted on your Talk page, you must provide evidence in the form of comparison diffs between Bobhhik and known socks. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 13:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
:*{{U|SpinnerLaserzthe2nd}}, all you've provided is links to the contributions of the master and the suspected sock. I've asked for diffs showing similarities in edits and behavior. I don't need you to click on the contributions of editors.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 13:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
*{{CURequest}} - The filer has unfortunately done a poor job of presenting evidence of socking. However, my own investigation shows that the allegation has merit. I'm requesting a CU to confirm. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 13:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
*CU data isn't entirely conclusive due to the use of a VPN service, but there are enough similarities for me to be confident that this is the same person. There is nothing in the data I can see to suggest any other account. Indeffed, closing. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 14:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 22:03, 6 November 2023


Norprobr

23 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Same edits as another sock on French colonial empire. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and already blocked and tagged, just doing the paperwork. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


23 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

This newly created account is undoing reverts by other users of edits from the previous sockpuppet Gutsyncti: Special:Diff/1161538043. Compare it to Special:Diff/1160904474. — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked and tagged. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


23 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked and tagged. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and tagged up to Jorensonousecu. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nagydtek blocked and tagged. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

New editor making the same edit as a previous sock. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


1 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

The same edits as the previous socks. All four socks have been blocked. M.Bitton (talk) 12:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


08 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

The same edits and personal attacks as the previous socks. All three have been blocked (just doing the paperwork). M.Bitton (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


01 September 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

This user appears to have the same habits as all the other sockpuppets of Norprobr. They are obsessed with edit warring and nationalist pov-pushing on articles surrounding French military history, such as the French conquest of Algeria and the French army. Skitash (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Notice how Bobhhik's user page is similar to Norprobr's userpages (the first evidence is a direct threat to AussieWikiDan because he removed a anti-Israel flag, second evidence and third evidence) and this user edits to any Hispanic-related articles especially those related to the Dominican Republic. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 12:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You may noticed that the similarities with Norprobr's edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Norprobr&target=Norprobr&offset=&limit=500) and Bobbhik's edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Bobhhik&target=Bobhhik&offset=&limit=500) when it comes to the Dominican Republic-related articles.

This user also removed edits regarding Brazil's role in the Angolan Civil War despite the fact that UNITA had confirmed that Brazil had supported the MPLA (https://irp.fas.org/world/para/docs/unita/en0510991.htm). You can see the comparisons (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angolan_Civil_War&diff=prev&oldid=1181319729 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angolan_Civil_War&diff=prev&oldid=1151029001).

Like Norprobr, Bobbhik was also involved in an edit war with an IP on the Santo Domingo article in August of this year (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1169882173, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1170793377, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1170866353 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santo_Domingo&oldid=1170875045). Yoshi24517 had warned both this user and the IP. I know this may not meet the 3RR criteria but please take a look at it.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested - The filer has unfortunately done a poor job of presenting evidence of socking. However, my own investigation shows that the allegation has merit. I'm requesting a CU to confirm. Bbb23 (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • CU data isn't entirely conclusive due to the use of a VPN service, but there are enough similarities for me to be confident that this is the same person. There is nothing in the data I can see to suggest any other account. Indeffed, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 14:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]