Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:57, 8 March 2007

[[:|WT:INWNB
WT:INB
WT:IND]]

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to /archive22. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

This page is a notice board for things particularly relevant to Wikipedians working on articles on India.

Do you need the Indic name(s) of something or somebody? Post a request for it.

Click here to add a new section

Congrats Bhadani, Sundar and Ganesh!

You guys are famous now!!! — Lost^(talk) 18:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, great! congrats.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 23:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. -- P.K.Niyogi 05:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!! Who says hard work doesn't pay off in the end? The Silent Contributor 07:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations you three! :) Glad to know I pushed 66% of them to adminship. :-) =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's amazing! I wonder if in the future more and more of us will be discussed about :) Gizza^Chat ^© 09:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's brilliant! Congrats guys! You're Wikicelebrities now, you should start handing out autographs. :P. In response to Gizza, Ambroodey wrote an article on Indo-Pak relations on Wiki on a blog some time ago. If Wiki continues to expand, such requests for arbitration may be covered slighlty and briefly in small newspapers, as it does represent an attempt to reach a resolution between Indians and Pakistanis on the world's best source of information and knowledge. — Nobleeagle ^[TALK] [C] 09:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Way too cool! congrats! --h y dka t 13:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I thank you all and the credit goes to wikipedia and the wikipedia community. Perhaps, the event [1] which was reported a day earlier on the front page in a newspaper with a readership of more than 3 million, is slated for more coverage in the Indian print and electronic media including the Economic Times and the India Today and possibly in the Business Today. Podcasts are expected in a day or two and flickr has many pictures of the event: [2] - [3]. Gizza, you are right. In days and months to come, more and more wikipedians shall be discussed about. BTW, more than 300 persons attended the event at one of the most prestigious IT destinations [4] of India and the event was extensively covered by the press. Jimmy liked to be mobbed [5] by the current and future wikipedians :) One thing more, an Indian wikipedian, Chauhan flew in from Chandigarh to Chennai to attend the WikiCamp . --Bhadani 10:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did Chauhan discuss the fortunes of the Indian cricket team? :) Blnguyen (bananabucket) 23:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blnguyen. I found Chauhan very silent and we remained together for most of the day. He is a cricket player but Wikipedia and Jimmy's presence kept him in "order" and he did not play cricket in the audotorium though balls were availble in abundance [6]. You and all others shall be able to listen to my voice for about four minutes within next 24 to 48 hours through a podcast here. --Bhadani 16:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the podcast gone already? I couldnt find it on the site — Lost^(talk) 08:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, look how far Bhadani has gone since he started off editing Mahuri in a very non-encyclopaedic style. :P [7] — Nobleeagle ^[TALK] [C] 08:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lost. Podcast is not lost. It will become live late tonight, and the the links by them are sent to around 25,000 boxes round the globe apart from being available at their site. The podcast is of about 18 minutes, mostly by Jimmy and Kribs and about 4 minutes by me. Thanks noble. --Bhadani 12:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These are active now: So spoke Jimmy, Kribs & Bhadani & Wiki-power. --Bhadani 18:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something nice about user Ganeshk here [8].Congrats.Shyamsunder 16:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lalu Yadav article

Moved from Talk:Hinduism

Dear Sirs/Mesdames,

I hereby urge you to take a look at the article Lalu Prasad Yadav, the notoriously corrupt Indian politician, although strictly speaking it is not a part of Hinduism. The article has been single-handedly managed by User:Ikonoblast, who seems to be a goon of Lalu. He has changed the article to a highly POV, non-neutral version. The article is unencyclopedic and look like an eulogy written in the praise of Lalu. His misdeeds, his illiterate wife and corruption cases have been trivialized/ignored, and people making fun of Lalu have been interpreted to be highlighting his "charismatic" character. The article seems to be a lobbying pamphlet to put forth Lalu as the next PM of India. I have tried to make some corrections, removed praises etc but my schedule just doesn't permit me enough time. Please take some time to edit this article WITH SUITABLE REFERENCES. Thanks, Cygnus_hansa 03:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Talk:India

Dear Sirs/Mesdames,

I hereby urge you to take a look at the article Lalu Prasad Yadav, the notoriously corrupt Indian politician, although strictly speaking it is not a part of India article. The article has been single-handedly managed by User:Ikonoblast, who seems to be a devotee of Lalu. He has changed the article to a highly POV, non-neutral version. The article is unencyclopedic and look like an eulogy written in the praise of Lalu. His misdeeds, his illiterate wife and corruption cases have been trivialized/ignored, and people making fun of Lalu have been interpreted to be highlighting his "charismatic" character. The article seems to be a lobbying pamphlet to put forth Lalu as the next PM of India. I have tried to make some corrections, removed praises etc but my schedule just doesn't permit me enough time. Please take some time to edit this article WITH SUITABLE REFERENCES. Thanks, Cygnus_hansa 03:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I have added illiteracy as a problem in India article in the intro. Thats how such people get elected in the first place.Cygnus_hansa 03:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a fan of Laloo, nor have I read the said article, but would be better if you too try to be more neutral yourself. Illitracy is a problem in India, but it is not the only reason for bad leaders. We have enough "literate" leaders who are corrupt too. Dont wish to name people, but the previous CM of Tamil Nadu is a good example.

Suggest you read more about the said person, as the CM, or as the Railway minister, where incidentally he seems to be winning accolades. His negatve must be mentioned, but so should the positive. He is afterall no different from other politicans in India, litrate, or illitrate.AJ-India 21:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that people like you might make Lalu one day the PM of India.Cygnus_hansa 01:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not me, but the people of India as a whole, who decide, who becomes the Prime Minister. Stop having a stereo type image of things, Indian politics (as is the case worldwide) is driven by leaders who can deliver, not by predefined notions of a good leader. And to that effect, all our leaders fall in that catagory, be it the "litterate" ones, or the "illiterate" ones. Wnen they deliver, they get re-elected, when they dont, they loose. And deliver here simply means satisfying the voters. The person in question, (of whom I am no fan,as I stated) has delivered, as a railway Minister, by turning it around. So as much as you, I, or for that matter anyone else, would like to deny him that credit, it goes to him, for that is how it works. If you blame the leaders for the state of affairs, when bad, they take the credit when they are good, simple.AJ-India 17:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cygnus_hansa, that's a very crude and personal remark to Arejay. He's right, see WP:NPA, and the clauses of WP:BIO. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nichalp - did you mean A-Jay?? Sarvagnya 20:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AJ-India, I don't deny that he has taken signifcantly good steps as a Railway Minister, or, at least, is doing his normal duty. But this does not give anyone the licence to ignore the past and write a Wikipedia article as his eulogy. Compare it to any politician's article: Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Jawaharlal Nehru, George Bush, Idi Amin, etc etc. You'll find great difference in style and content. This is my whole point, that the article is not written in Wikipedia's style. From your view, I think there seems to be a nice "liberal" view rising in India, who think "Aweeeeeee", "O my God"...."we thought this guy was so stupid and uneducated, and he has done such things to Indian railway....we should give him a chance to be in even a greater position, despite all his ills in the past."Cygnus_hansa 20:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cygnus_hansa, if you feel that the Lalu Prasad Yadav is written as a hagiography you are welcome to rewrite it in a more neutral style (with references) and even invite other editors to help. However as an experienced editor here you should know that spamming unrelated pages (such as Hinduism, India) and insulting other editors (e.g. [9]), not only violates wikipedia policies but also doesn't reflect well on you. Regards. Abecedare 20:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abecedare, magicalsaumy is a competent 'admin on hindi wikipedia, he does know the rules and knows what he is talking about. User:Ikonoblast is perhaps the worst troll I have ever encountered on wikipedia, and believe me, I have met many of them.Baka man 23:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An admin should know better. Having posted such a rude comment and not apologising doesn't reflect well on him, irrespective of who he's dealing with. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India Poised

This is a request to all members who think they can make a good userbox to make a new userbox on the "idea" started by The Times of India called "India Poised" . It could probably say something like :
I Believe
I believe in India Poised where "India Poised" should be a link to an article on the same . This means we should all begin contributing to an article with the name "India Poised" . Please reply with your ideas and userboxe ,if any . --Nishantsharma87 10:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [[WP:NOR], WP:NOT. The article on India poised should the written about the ToI series, not for the series. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Konkani Wikipedia

The Konkani Wikipedia has been in existence on Wikimedia Incubator since August 2006; but is sufferering from a lack of contributions. Till now it has been the singlehanded effort of User:Fredricknoronha. I request all Konkani Wikipedians to please contribute to this efforts. We need people to translate existing articles from the English Wikipeida, to create new articles , to transliterate articles from one script/dialect to another, images etc.

Regards --Deepak D'Souza 11:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will this be in Devnagiri or Romanised? =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally it should be in Kannada script as that is the script that a large majority of native Konkani speakers use. Anyway, where is this Konkani WP? Is there one? I cant find it. Sarvagnya 16:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All three I think because many wikipedias use more than one language like Turkmen and kashmiri.Baka man 01:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you link us to the wikipedia? The Silent Contributor 05:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Budget

I started an article on Chidambaram's Dream Budget of 97-98. Help from anyone interested in finance, economics, budgets, etc. to expand the article is most welcome. - Aksi_great (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

overhaul

Category:Tamil Americans,, Category:Keralite americans, etc. I believe that the cats should be upmerged to Category:Indian Americans and Category:Sri Lankan Americans and the ethnicites be upmerged to Category:Tamil politicians, Category:Marathi writers, Category:Malayali scientists, etc.

An example, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar would have cats Category:Tamil scientists, Category:Indian Americans, instead of Tamil Americans, Indian Americans, Tamil scientists, etc.Baka man 01:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red rain in Kerala

I am currently working on getting Red rain in Kerala upto featured status for the April fools main page article (yes, thats only 4 weeks!), the artile is GA standard at the minute, so there won't be a massive work load. Could I have a few volunteers who would be willing to help me with this? RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 15:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can critique it. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just glanced at the article and the subject looks very interesting. I'll be glad to be of any help. One quick point though: Most of the images in the article are copyrighted and used under the Fair use criteria; I wonder if the will be a problem for WP:WIAFA and a stronger justification for use will be required... Abecedare 19:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is one concern we'll have to get over, we'll have to reduce the number of picures I think in the article, however, I don't think its amajor hurdle, have you gotany idea's on how we move forward? RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 19:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of Fair-use images appear on the talk page. They should be removed as soon as possible. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 11:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consider using charts, diagrams, maps and tables as substitutes instead of just images. We can draw them if you need. =Nichalp «Talk»= 11:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try scouring the following domains for more information:

gov.in
nic.in
ernet.in
gov

=Nichalp «Talk»= 17:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IAST

Do we have a set policy on the addition of IAST for an article? =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These are the conventions I am aware of: for Indic articles and for Dharmic articles. Although there doesn't yet seem to be universal agreement on the issue, especially in Hinduism related articles; see for example this discussion. Abecedare 21:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After Times of india, it is Vijay Times

After Times of India, it is Vijay Times which is plagiarizing Wikipedia articles and images. Most of today's Sunday supplement was plagarised verbatim from wikipedia articles. What more, even the images were used were taken from wikipedia. There was a series on World's largest empires and there were articles on Roman Empire, Mongol Empire and a few Indian empires. Most parts of Mongol and Roman empires articles were almost completely taken taken from wikipedia ([10] and [11]) , where as all the images used for Indian empire articles were from wikipedia ([12]). -- Naveen ^(talk) 15:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Times is now part of the Times of India group, so this is possibly a sign of TOI culture :-) -- Naveen ^(talk) 15:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please report this to Administrator's noticeboard for a larger audience, and a possible remedy. Thanks. --Ragib 15:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shmitra reported more such blatant plagiarism from Satyajit Ray. I have reported this to the ANB. This needs to be publicized to make Times of India listen. --Ragib 01:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In those Vijay Times links that Naveen's posted above, apart from plagiarising WP, some content is also picked verbatim from another site. This I found out after just picking one string at random and googling. Guess the whole article is plagiarised from various sources. Sarvagnya 03:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major changes to Portal:India suggested

Hi all,

I have proposed some major changes to Portal:India. Please review/discuss. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 16:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Message for WP India] Kingbotk Plugin

A quick overview for newcomers: The Kingbotk Plugin is a set of add-on tools for the wiki editor, AWB. In bot mode it offers robust templating for WikiProjects. In manual mode, it can also be used to help editors assess articles quickly and efficiently.

Per requests, myself and Reedy Boy (talk · contribs) have just released a new version of the Kingbotk Plugin which is compatible with the latest AWB. To make things even easier, the plugin now ships with AWB. You may also have noticed my bot running over the last few days, testing the new version.

Since your WikiProject is one of the few which are programatically supported it's important that you inform us of any important changes to your WikiProject's template which have occurred in the last few months.

The most important change we should know about is new redirects to your template. If your template could possibly be used on talk pages with a different name unknown to the plugin, double templating could result. Please take the time to check for redirects to your project's template - somebody might have created one without you noticing.
Deprecated or removed parameters. We don't want complaints that the plugin is using old syntax now do we? :)
Not critical in terms of annoying the masses, but for your own convenience you might want to let us know of any new parameters that the plugin needs to support. Remember, it only needs to support parameters which will be added by bots or which are useful in the article assessment process.

I hope you still find the tool useful. Comments, questions and bug reports to User talk:Kingbotk/Plugin. Cheers. --kingboyk 17:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC) PS I hope to have a new revision (version 1 release candidate 2) ready later today, for shipping with the next AWB release.[reply]

Re:Times of India

Lo fellas,

I'm doing a blog article on plagiarism by Times of India. How would ya guys like to have ToI have exposed on http://www.desipundit.com . I'm counting on this article to be read by guys at Indian Express... I ofcourse need a coupla more of our diffs lifted by Bennet and Coleman Co. Amey Aryan DaBrood^© 05:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See http://deepakkrishnan.blogspot.com/2007/02/plagiarism-by-times-of-india.html from last month. I anonymously added our links in the comments today. Tintin 05:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shyam Lal Meena

Is this article located in the right place? Is it a conflation of info about two different people with similar names? I'm not very familiar with the way Indian names work, and when I stumbled across this stub and went looking for sources to verify/expand it, I found some confusion about the name. This gov't page listing the Arjuna Award winners gives the name of the 1989 archery winner as just "Shyam Lal", as does this article on the archery team, and this article refers to the award winner as "Shyam Lal Salwan" (unless he's the Shyam Lal who won it for gymnastics in 1961). Can anyone shed some light on this? -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 17:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

B. C. Khanduri

B. C. Khanduri needs a bit of copyediting and reformatting of the article structure. --Gurubrahma 06:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC) (and I go back into hibernation)[reply]

Nobleeagle

Can anyone explain what's going on? — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 07:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Noida serial murder investigation

I have been editing this page since a few days and no one, yes, no one has even tried to edit the article and make it better. It has also been recognised by as an article of low importance by certain users. This is a a very recent event! Would there be anyone interested to work along with me on this article? Thanks for assistance, Zamkudi 13:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indian administrator mentioned on BBC National Radio

Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (talk · contribs) was mentioned on BBC National Radio. Here's the link: [13] Happy editing! – riana_dzasta 14:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 173: / Line 173: @@
 ==[[2006 Noida serial murder investigation]]==
 I have been editing this page since a few days and no one, yes, no one has even tried to edit the article and make it better. It has also been recognised by as an article of ''low importance'' by certain users. This is a a ''very recent event''! Would there be anyone interested to work along with me on this article? Thanks for assistance, [[User:Zamkudi|Zamkudi]] 13:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
+==Indian administrator mentioned on BBC National Radio==
+{{User|Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington}} was mentioned on BBC National Radio. Here's the link: [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today4_wikipedia_20070307.ram] Happy editing! &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 14:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)