Talk:Third Anglo-Afghan War

Archives (Index)

2012/May 2015/November 2021/August 2021/September 2022/October 2024/October 2024/December

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Stop reverting the result box

Again, WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX states that it should be clear and not redundant, with an obvious shown case of what happened, hence the Treaty of Gandamak and recognition of Afghan independence, if people want to dig in deeper, they can go to the treaty's sources itself. this is directed to users AtmaramU and HaughtonBrit. Noorullah21 (talk) 05:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing to my attention about the removal of the contents you made. The choice of which ones are appropriate for a particular article is left to the discretion of the article's editors. Hope that helps. HaughtonBrit (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Alright thank you. Noorullah21 (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

@199.82.243.102 You are adding sourced editions that only state "Virtually a british protectorate", which doesn't acclaim to one as multiple other sources state that they are infact a british protected state, this is due to the reason that Afghanistan was not considered nor included apart of the British raj as the British only exercised foreign rights access. Noorullah21 (talk) 16:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Stop reverting the result box

Stop reverting the original content and please do not mispresent WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX. This is directed to user Noorullah21. There is no reason for the content to be removed. Those who are interested in reading the link can definitely go through it if they prefer but it gives you no reason to remove the content of other editors and source links.AtmaramU (talk) 09:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

I am not mispresenting WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX in anyway, this is the appropriate term and you can go read on it, if you wish to hold a consensus or something here over the topic, then you can, I am just doing over what is appropriate amongst it. Noorullah21 (talk) 18:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

If you really want to fix the article to your appeal.. you could just make your own see aftermath section @AtmaramU Noorullah21 (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

You are clearly failing to understand and editing the content as it best suits you only. Once again, please do not remove content and sources

@Noorullah21 AtmaramU (talk) 03:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

This is removing content and sources to put it appropriately under MILMOS#INFOBOX, I will be getting a third opinion on this as well and I hope that stops you from reverting edits if they do agree to conclude this. Noorullah21 (talk) 08:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

You have already been told by one editor that the content is "It is clear, terse perhaps, but clear." And the other told you to get a third opinion and yet you continued to remove the content and sources. So yes, please consider the route of third opinion first. Thank you. AtmaramU (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)