Jump to content

Wikipedia:Schools/Old proposal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JYolkowski (talk | contribs)
rm "but are not necessarily indicators of notability", see User talk:Dahliarose
tag "rejected"; no edits since Dec. 23, talk page discussions have died off without reaching concensus
Line 1: Line 1:
{{merge|Schools3}}
{{dablink|You may be looking for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools]] (WP:SCH), [[Wikipedia:School and university projects]] or [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day]] (WP:NFT). The previous policy proposal is now at [[Wikipedia:Schools/Defunct]].}}
{{dablink|You may be looking for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools]] (WP:SCH), [[Wikipedia:School and university projects]] or [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day]] (WP:NFT). The previous policy proposal is now at [[Wikipedia:Schools/Defunct]].}}
{{rejected}}
{{proposed|[[WP:SCHOOL]]}}
{{IncGuide}}
{{IncGuide}}
''This is a work in progress. Editors are encouraged to improve it and discuss ideas on the [[Wikipedia talk:Schools|talk page]].''


Schools are frequently important to their communities, and are often the subject of the sort of [[WP:RS|non-trivial published works]] that are needed to [[WP:FA|complete an article]]. Wikipedia articles about schools should show that there is sufficient coverage of that school to allow for the creation of a complete article.
Schools are frequently important to their communities, and are often the subject of the sort of [[WP:RS|non-trivial published works]] that are needed to [[WP:FA|complete an article]]. Wikipedia articles about schools should show that there is sufficient coverage of that school to allow for the creation of a complete article.

Revision as of 19:58, 19 January 2007

Schools are frequently important to their communities, and are often the subject of the sort of non-trivial published works that are needed to complete an article. Wikipedia articles about schools should show that there is sufficient coverage of that school to allow for the creation of a complete article.

Editors may consider a primary or secondary school to be best handled in a separate article if it verifiably meets at least one of the following criteria:

  1. The school has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself, including published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, television documentaries, and public reports by schools inspection agencies and consumer watchdog organizations,Template:Fn Template:Fn Template:Fn that meet all of the following criteria:
    • The coverage is of value in building an encyclopedia (which excludes sources such as newspaper articles that simply mention the school in passing, or directories of schools that offer nothing more than demographic data, or lists of alumni that offer no content other than lists of names or years). Template:Fn
    • The work is independent of the school itself. Works published by the school itself or its staff, students, or faculty, are generally excluded.
    • The work is sufficiently reliable to support the facts in the article.
  2. The school has alumni (plural) who are notable according to WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC.
  3. The school is distinctive in any one of the following areas, or in any other areas for which it has received press or other coverage:Template:Fn
    • Age
    • Curriculum (Academics in U.S.)
    • Architecture
    • Awards
    • Events that have occurred at the school
    • Extracurricular activities, including sports

Articles about schools that do not meet the above criteria may be unexpandable save for demographic data. Wikipedia is also neither a directory nor a phonebook. School articles should not merely list upcoming events, phone numbers, schedules etc. Such articles should be merged into an article about their parent community or school district. See Wikipedia:Places of local interest for more suggestions for dealing with such articles.

Notes

  • Template:Fnb Self-promotion is not the route to having a Wikipedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the school. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.)
  • Template:Fnb What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad. Some examples: Rift Valley Academy and The King's School, Worcester have been the subjects of books. Maywood Avenue School has been the subject of several full-length newspaper articles. All state schools in England, including all primary and nursery schools, are subjected to regular Ofsted reports. These reports can provide a useful source of information.
  • Template:Fnb Newspaper coverage includes regular coverage in local media (such as complete stories about a school's athletic program).
  • Template:Fnb It is assumed these distinctive features indicate there will be sufficient sources to provide the necessary coverage. For instance, if a school is far older than any other school in the locality it will probably have received adequate coverage over the years. Finally, being distinctive locally is sufficient if the local area is sufficiently large (e.g. if there's only one or a few schools, that's not a big enough area of comparison).