To add to this deletion debate, click here
Another September 11 victim. Adam Bishop 05:08, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Memorial and delete - at least this one's NYFD. -- Cyrius | (talk) 05:23, Mar 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Memorial and delete. Being a deputy fire chief is worthy of respect, but not encyclopaedic. Average Earthman 10:06, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Worthy of inclusion. Everyking 14:01, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Worthy of inclusion why? Bearcat 14:31, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Verifiable and useful for social context. Also marginally famous as a participant in a historical event. And if you insist something has to be widely famous to be worth an article, I expect most of Wikipedia will be nominated for deletion soon. Everyking 17:42, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Worthy of inclusion why? Bearcat 14:31, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Memorial and delete and redirect link from Casualties of the September 11, 2001 Attacks: City of New York. Niteowlneils 16:30, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. BL 00:32, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Alex S 03:40, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Deputy chief. What is NPOV or non-verifiable? It's already more than a one-line stub. anthony (this comment is a work in progress and may change without prior notice) 11:15, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Wikimemorial and delete. ("and Yankee's fan"??? Come on. Do you think this article can ever be NPOV'ed and verified and still have enough left to be more than a one line sub-stub?) Rossami 22:47, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Interesting case. Already an adequate stub, unlike many 9/11 victim articles. The question of whether useful material can ever be added is the important one IMO. Another important discussion to archive at Wikipedia:9/11 victims when closed.Andrewa 20:12, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Move to 9/11 memorial and delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:42, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Move to sep 11 wiki and delete. Maximus Rex 07:51, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- we deleted the chief, so move and delete this one too. --Jiang 10:40, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)