Talk:Medical optical imaging

This

This article is complete rubbish as far as the title goes.

It is known as either: "scatter light optical imaging" or "scatter field optical imaging" or "scatter ..... optical imaging" Slicky 21:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Scatter field optical imaging is very different from the neuroscience diffuse optical imaging but 7Piguine is right that the article is general and in my opinion should cover pretty much every type of optical technique from microscopy to photography methodsAzurex120 (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

ack: "Optical imaging" is far more than what is described here. It includes techniques from ordinary microscopy to single molecule fluorescent or CARS microscopy. --7Piguine (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Visual

In order to assist those not familiar with the main structures in the brain, providing visual aids or pictures may be helpful and serve as an asset to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wood.ashleyb (talk • contribs) 14:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomenclature

I would slightly take issue with the comments above (azurex120 and 7Penguine), in medical imaging circles "optical imaging" is used to describe a set of macroscopic techniques using IR visible and (maybe) UV wavelengths (see http://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?Sec=sup&Sub=mol&Pag=dis&ItemId=610944&wf=902) . This is unfortunate nomenclature since I can see that to people outside medicine the term would seem much wider and include microscopy (even photography and videography?). Perhaps the heading of the article should be modified to "Clinical Optical imaging" or "Medical Optical Imaging". I completely agree with Ashley Wood that some illustrations would greatly improve the article. The article should also be expanded considerably, but i' afraid I am not knowledgeable enough in the field to do that myself.Squid57squid (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I changed the title but this and related articles need tidying up Billlion (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical optical imaging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.gcal.ac.uk/sls/Vision/research/Gibsonetal05Review.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716094238/http://www.licor.com/bio/products/imaging_systems/pearl/pearl_sensitivity.jsp to http://www.licor.com/bio/products/imaging_systems/pearl/pearl_sensitivity.jsp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)