Talk:Bad as Me

Latest comment: 7 years ago by TheOldJacobite in topic Bad As Me

The 'Background' Section Can't Be Any More Irrelevant

edit

It's basically a background of Waits' timeline since he started with Anti- Records, how is that relevant to the actual album itself? It should either provide better information or be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.42.122.206 (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the anonymous user's inelegantly-stated opinion. This article should be about this album, the other information belongs in the Tom Waits article. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 00:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate refs

edit

References 33-39 look to be identical, from a cursory glance. Is there any reason they should not be combined? ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 00:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Genres

edit

I started a discussion here of the genres on Tom Waits albums. I encourage all interested editors to participate. Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 16:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bad As Me

edit

This article is at the wrong title. The official title, according to ANTI-, 99% of the reviews, and the Grammy Awards page, is Bad As Me. The article cannot be moved, though, because Bad As Me already exists as a redirect page. This needs to be fixes. WP's capitalization guidelines aside, the article page should match the official title. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 14:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply