Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,778 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (September 2024) |
Submission declined on 3 September 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 2 January 2023 by Pichemist (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Pichemist 23 months ago. |
Type of site | news |
---|---|
Available in | French |
Traded as | Tom Hikari |
Headquarters | Kinshasa |
Country of origin | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Founder(s) | Jeanric Umande , Lyly Miandambu Mutombo |
URL | ouragan |
Ouragan.cd is a Congolese digital information media specialized in political, economic, security and sociocultural information.[1][2]
Insight
editOuragan.cd is a general information site created in 2019 by Jeanric Umande and Lyly Miandambu Mutombo in the Democratic Republic of Congo.[3][4] Its main objective is to democratize information and make it accessible to all.[5][2]
Ouragan.cd is also a webradio[6] of the Democratic Republic of Congo broadcasting worldwide via the Internet.[3]
References
edit- ^ Nzogu, Noël (2023-10-16). "Médias : le parcours élogieux d'Ouragan.cd". Infos-Express.Com (in French). Retrieved 2024-09-03.
- ^ a b Bukasa, Sarah (2018-03-14). "Ouragan.cd, la naissance d'un média prometteur". ChallengeInfo (in French). Retrieved 2024-09-03.
- ^ a b "Ouragan FM". OnlineRadioBox.com (in French). Retrieved 2022-07-26.
- ^ infocongovirtuel (2021-01-10). "Médias : Ouragan.cd remplace Ouraganfm.cd, Jeanric Umande expose sur ce changement". Actualités congolaises et internationales (in French). Retrieved 2024-09-03.
- ^ Admin (2022-07-14). "Médias : Les hommages émouvants d'Ouragan.cd au..." Alternance (in French). Retrieved 2022-08-15.
- ^ "Ouragan FM". Radio.cd (in French). Retrieved 2022-07-27.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.