Welcome to my talk page, feel free to try the expired deepfried overly-cheesed cheese cake and cheese sticks, if you can find them. :)

RandomEditorAAA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi RandomEditorAAA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanns Wolf has been accepted

edit
 
Hanns Wolf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gonzalo Curiel (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arturo Rodríguez. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Aight, sorry about that. RandomEditorAAA (talk) 16:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chanan Singh Dhillon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loreto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fixed RandomEditorAAA (talk) 16:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Platymma

edit

Hello. I have completed the merge at Platymma. Thanks for your contribution! YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

No problemo! - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi RandomEditorAAA! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Ref problem searching, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gustavo Becerra-Schmidt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi RandomEditorAAA! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, COVID-19 pandemic in Canada references problem "The time allocated for running scripts has expired.", has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Damn it, I thought this was about my AFC submission... RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi RandomEditorAAA! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edit Revisions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Damn it, I thought this was about my AFC submission... RandomEditorAAA (talk) 21:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Trevor Baxendale

edit

Hello, RandomEditorAAA,

I wanted to leave you a note about this article you PROD'd (it has since been de-PROD'd but that's not the issue). It's important, when you tag an article with a PROD, to mention this in an edit summary. Edit summaries are always a good idea but it's especially important with proposed deletion because in instances like this, when an article has been de-PROD'd, if another editor considers PRODding it in the future, they need to see that it has been PROD'd before. This is seen by looking at the edit summaries in the page history. If you use Twinkle, it should leave an appropriate edit summary. I did see that you posted a notification on the page creator's page which is just great, thanks for doing that.

I hope you are having a good holiday season! Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it is a bad habit of mine to mark every edit as "minor" and leave without an edit summary, even when the edit isn't minor and an edit summary is needed like in this case. I made the same mistake when I PROD'd another article, however I edited the article again and mentioned it in that edit summary. Thank you for reminding me Liz, hopefully I will remember for future cases like this. Thanks, and Happy Holidays - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of symphonies in E-flat minor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koichi Kishi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edit at Rebecca F. Doherty

edit

I see that you cited some sources for content added by a an IP contributor, however, I just wanted to inform you that the DWI conviction was to a common pleas judge in Ohio NOT Judge Rebecca F. Doherty, a senior federal district court judge. I have removed all the content regarding the DWI from the federal judge's article. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 04:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Iamreallygoodatcheckers, I apologize for my mistake, I have accidentally overlooked the differences when I was fixing the referencing problem. Thank you for letting me know, have a great day! - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 04:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of works commissioned by the Royal Philharmonic Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benjamin Cox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

AvIcAdO

edit
  You take the avicado it was expired by 10 years
Can you get the donkeys LuisaGod (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the long awaited arrival of the "avicado", I shall bring the donkeys at some time before noon of the next day. - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 22:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver King (composer) has been accepted

edit
 
Oliver King (composer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wgullyn (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 17:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi RandomEditorAAA! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikipedia article name, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Careful!

edit

Hello! With this edit, I saw where you added a < to fix a ref, but you also removed a pair of braces near the beginning of the article and created a wreck, with a large chunk of the article's content becoming tangled in a {{refn}} note at the bottom of the article. I've put the braces back. I don't know whether that leaves in place another problem that you were trying to solve, but I'm letting you know in case there was one and you still want to try to solve it. But removing those braces won't be the solution! Largoplazo (talk) 13:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am deeply sorry for my mistake here, I was probably tired that day and somehow didn't notice when previewing (looking back it was obvious I have done something wrong so I don't know why I missed it back then), I probably thought that those 2 brackets were unneccersary as I probably thought it was supposed to be the closing brackets of the citation template that someone miswrote there. Thank you for fixing the issue and letting me know, I again apologize for my mistake. Thank you - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 21:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Countering vandalism

edit

Thank you for your help in countering vandalism on Wikipedia. I see from a recent edit summary that you might like some guidance. For simple vandalism, we usually issue escalating warnings. For example, I've tagged one IP you reverted with {{uw-disruptive2}}. If they persist after a level four warning, please report them to AIV, where an admin will consider blocking them. How to respond to vandalism has more advice, and the Counter-Vandalism Unit will also be happy to help. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 11:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Certes:, thank you for the assistance and guidance on how to counter vandalism, I very much appreciate it! The user seems to be already on Stage 3 warning, when I have the time, I will continue watching the user and give a final and 4th warning if proved neccesary. Thank you once again, have a good day! - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Otilie Suková-Dvořáková

edit

  Hello, RandomEditorAAA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Otilie Suková-Dvořáková, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wait what, I didn't get a notification for this...
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RAIGN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinematic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, RandomEditorAAA

Thank you for creating 105263157894736842.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@SunDawn: No problem, thank you for reviewing pages and spending time improving Wikipeda, have a great day! - Thanks, RandomEditorAAA (talk) 23:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fernand Le Borne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belgian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birria language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Now this was intended. - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Eugene Pabst

edit

Hello RandomEditorAAA,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eugene Pabst for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Eugene Pabst to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dab page talk pages

edit

Hallo, Please don't create disambiguation page talk pages like Talk:Milk bread where there is no "talk" content. The disambiguation WikiProject knows about all disambiguation pages and doesn't need the banner to alert them, and creating the page just means that someone working on the dab page sees that there is a dab page and might feel they need to check it in case the discussion there is relevant to what they're doing, so creating the talk page is not only unnecessary but actually unhelpful.

See the template documentation at {{WikiProject Disambiguation}}, which explicitly says Please do not use this template solely to create talk pages that otherwise have no content. Thanks. PamD 19:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ah sorry, my bad, I will keep track of that, thank you - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 01:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply