Wikipedia

Talk:Lac-Mégantic, Quebec

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Photos, maps, expansion

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

A road map of town would be good. And aerial photos from before and after the derailment. Also, perhaps the burn area map from the derailment article. This article definitely needs expansion, to properly summarize the derailment article, and cover all the areas of town that have been covered in the news lately, what was destroyed, what wasn't. Musi-Cafe apparently was an important place in town, for example. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

That seems a bit much as the information is already in (or should be in) the derailment article. Musi-Café is just another bar and wouldn't be famous worldwide except for its proximity to the train crash. We don't need two articles on the same topic. We do, however, need to check whether any info in this article is now outdated, ie. "X is the most historic building in town, go visit it today" makes sense only if X is still standing. K7L (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
No, since wikipedia is not concerned with only the today, it is also concerned with the past, so if X historic building existed, it should be part of the history of the town. As a major event, a significant summary of the crash should exist here. Rescue efforts and blame do not belong on this article, but a summary of the damage does belong here, and before and after photos would illustrate the damage. In any case, the before photo would be useful for the history of town. And a roadmap would matter regardless, unless they reconfigure the roads after they start rebuilding, in which case, a before would be for the historical town, and after would be for the future town. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
The photos of the disaster belong in the article about the disaster. Repeating them here is pointless redundancy. I'm removing these. K7L (talk) 06:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Except in special circumstances (like the train disaster map in the disaster's article), Wikipedia does not insert road maps into our articles; rather, users who want road maps can use the geographic coordinates link to choose any of several separate mapping websites (Bing Maps, Google Maps, etc.) And K7L did not, for the record, suggest that any building that was destroyed in the train incident should be erased entirely from the article; he suggested that we need to watch for situations where we're using an incorrect tense such that a building that was destroyed might be listed in the article as still existing. Bearcat (talk) 21:10, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the claim that the former Banque de Montréal building is "still standing". An online search finds "5193, rue Frontenac, G6B 1H2" as the address of the bank, which appears to have become a lawyer/legal aid office. If that address is correct, that puts this somewhere between the damaged Jean-Couteux pharmacy and ground zero. Not a good place to be.
Charred shell of a destroyed bank building, 5185-5193 Frontenac: http://globalnews.ca/news/704818/gallery-dramatic-photos-from-the-red-zone-in-lac-megantic/ K7L (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Lac-Megantic derailment from space (4 July crop).jpg

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
 
Lac-Megantic from space

Why is this being removed? This clearly shows what Lac-Megantic looks like from space, in comparison with Quebec City, this has nothing to do with the derailment, since this was taken before the derailment. Obviously, this shows the town, not the derailment. (July 4 is days before the derailment, so this obviously isn't a derailment picture) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 10:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

This doesn't "clearly show what Lac Megantic looks like" from anywhere. It's an infrared photo with a ridiculously large scale so that the town is only a blip at best. It's useless outside its original context. If you want more images, steal them from fr:Lac Mégantic or somewhere because adding this tells nothing useful about the town itself. K7L (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
There's no value to including this image in the article, as within the scale of the image Lac-Mégantic is almost too tiny to even count as a blip — it's literally about the size of the head of a pin. (And for the record, there's no value in including it in Quebec City either, as that article lacks any context to explain why Lac-Mégantic is the only other labelled location on it besides Quebec City itself.) If there were aerial images available that were much, much more closely zoomed in on Lac-Mégantic and Quebec City than this, those might be valuable and legitimate contributions to our articles on the cities — but this image serves no useful or encyclopedic purpose in either article. Bearcat (talk) 21:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Minor quibble with the two previous comments. fr:Lac Mégantic (no hyphen) is the lake, fr:Lac-Mégantic (with an hyphen) is the town.. As for the subject of this thread, the picture from space is not that useful. Bouchecl (talk) 13:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Before/After Photo

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It would be nice for someone to create a legal version similar to this photo http://i.imgur.com/WgqO4XS.jpg for this article. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 14:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

It would certainly be nice, but how are you suggesting they do it? Taking an 'after' picture might not be too difficult (unless you want an aerial shot like the ones you link), but the 'before' picture is going to be difficult... AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lac-Mégantic,_Quebec&oldid=1201627230"