Talk:Judith Lewis Herman

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

article expansion

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi all. The previous version needed to be replaced, so much so that I decided to write the article myself, although I've never done it before. I wanted to put something new up right away, so what is there now is quite provisional. I'm a slow writer and not an expert, so the writing and research for a full article (from me) will take a while.

I also haven't quite figured out some of the stylistic conventions, especially for the endnotes and how detailed they have to be. It's been a while since I had to write anything with footnotes.

Cheers.SeattleJoe (talk) 23:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks like a good start. It may take a while to get used to the Wikipedia writing style and conventions, there's no hurry. Since you mentioned footnotes, here are some links that can help: Wikipedia:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, Wikipedia:Citing sources. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 07:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note to Jack-a-Roe: Thanks a million or the edits and for keeping an eye on this. I really appreciate it. And proud to have it regarded as having gone beyond the "stub" stage!

I would take issue with one edit: reinstating that last paragraph, which I deleted on purpose. The Phyllis Chesler quote is a link to a blurb on the cover of the paperback edition, which seems a bit dicey, and the quote itself is a kind of over-the-top. I tried to deal with the importance and reputation of of the book more soberly by saying "it is considered a classic and ground-breaking work" (although the reference for this is an out-of-print Publisher's Weekly article quoted on the Amazon.com page for Trauma and Recovery! Not much better than a blurb, but it was surprisingly hard to find a source that could be used to back up the well-known fact of the book's reputation and influence. I'm not even sure if it's necessary, but I can imagine the people who think of her as a purveyor of "pseudoscience" challenging any positive remarks about her work.)

The fact that she was interviewed for that UC at Berkely series doesn't seem to be of any particular significance, and in any case I cite it in the footnotes and the links section. I'll be using it a lot more, it's very useful.

Cheers. SeattleJoe (talk) 06:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I re-added that paragraph not because it's particularly important to me personally, but because it goes to establishing her notability. WP:Notability is required for an author to have a Wikipedia article. When we have more substantive material to include, then those items would be less necessary. Until then I think it's a good idea to keep them. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 07:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I happily concede to your wisdom and experience. And your rewrite fixes a lot of the problem ... SeattleJoe (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Judith Lewis Herman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic