Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

NLO and off-shell effects in top quark mass determinations

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 July 2018
  • Volume 2018, article number 129, (2018)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
NLO and off-shell effects in top quark mass determinations
Download PDF
  • Gudrun Heinrich1,
  • Andreas Maier2,
  • Richard Nisius1,
  • Johannes Schlenk3,
  • Markus Schulze4,
  • Ludovic Scyboz1 &
  • …
  • Jan Winter5 

  • 404 Accesses

  • 17 Citations

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We study the impact of different theoretical descriptions of top quark pair production on top quark mass measurements in the di-lepton channel. To this aim, the full NLO corrections to \( pp\to {W}^{+}{W}^{-}b\overline{b}\to \left({e}^{+}{\nu}_e\right)\left({\mu}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\mu}\right)b\overline{b} \) production are compared to calculations in the narrow width approximation, where the production of a top quark pair is calculated at NLO and combined with three different descriptions of the top quark decay: leading order, next-to-leading order and via a parton shower. The different theory predictions then enter the calibration of template fit functions, which are used for a fit to pseudo-data. The offsets in the top quark mass resulting from the fits based on the various theoretical descriptions are determined.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Off-shell top quarks with one jet at the LHC: a comprehensive analysis at NLO QCD

Article Open access 17 November 2016

NLO QCD corrections to off-shell \({t{\bar{t}}W^\pm }\) production at the LHC: correlations and asymmetries

Article Open access 31 July 2021

NNLO QCD corrections to leptonic observables in top-quark pair production and decay

Article Open access 24 May 2021
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. M. Czakon, M.L. Mangano, A. Mitov and J. Rojo, Constraints on the gluon PDF from top quark pair production at hadron colliders, JHEP 07 (2013) 167 [arXiv:1303.7215] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Guzzi, K. Lipka and S.-O. Moch, Top-quark pair production at hadron colliders: differential cross section and phenomenological applications with DiffTop, JHEP 01 (2015) 082 [arXiv:1406.0386] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. del Duca and E. Laenen, Top physics at the LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530063 [arXiv:1510.06690] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Czakon, N.P. Hartland, A. Mitov, E.R. Nocera and J. Rojo, Pinning down the large-x gluon with NNLO top-quark pair differential distributions, JHEP 04 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1611.08609] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Final combination of the CDF results on top-quark mass, CDF Note 11080 (2014).

  6. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Combination of D0 measurements of the top quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 112004 [arXiv:1703.06994] [INSPIRE].

  7. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the \( t\overline{t} \) → lepton+jets channel from \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV ATLAS data, ATLAS-CONF-2017-071 (2017).

  8. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass using proton-proton data at \( \sqrt{(s)}=7 \) and 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 072004 [arXiv:1509.04044] [INSPIRE].

  9. √ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the \( t\overline{t} \) → dilepton channel from \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV ATLAS data, Phys. Lett. B 761 (2016) 350 [arXiv:1606.02179] [INSPIRE].

  10. S. Frixione and A. Mitov, Determination of the top quark mass from leptonic observables, JHEP 09 (2014) 012 [arXiv:1407.2763] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Beneke, P. Marquard, P. Nason and M. Steinhauser, On the ultimate uncertainty of the top quark pole mass, Phys. Lett. B 775 (2017) 63 [arXiv:1605.03609] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Butenschoen, B. Dehnadi, A.H. Hoang, V. Mateu, M. Preisser and I.W. Stewart, Top Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 232001 [arXiv:1608.01318] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Kawabata and H. Yokoya, Top-quark mass from the diphoton mass spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 323 [arXiv:1607.00990] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A.H. Hoang et al., The MSR mass and the \( \mathcal{O}\left({\Lambda}_{\mathrm{QCD}}\right) \) renormalon sum rule, JHEP 04 (2018) 003 [arXiv:1704.01580] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A.H. Hoang, C. Lepenik and M. Preisser, On the Light Massive Flavor Dependence of the Large Order Asymptotic Behavior and the Ambiguity of the Pole Mass, JHEP 09 (2017) 099 [arXiv:1706.08526] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak and I.W. Stewart, Extracting a Short Distance Top Mass with Light Grooming, arXiv:1708.02586 [INSPIRE].

  17. G. Bevilacqua, H.B. Hartanto, M. Kraus, M. Schulze and M. Worek, Top quark mass studies with \( t\overline{t}j \) at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2018) 169 [arXiv:1710.07515] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Nason, The Top Mass in Hadronic Collisions, arXiv:1712.02796.

  19. G. Corcella, R. Franceschini and D. Kim, Fragmentation Uncertainties in Hadronic Observables for Top-quark Mass Measurements, Nucl. Phys. B 929 (2018) 485 [arXiv:1712.05801] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Ferrario Ravasio, T. Ježo, P. Nason and C. Oleari, A theoretical study of top-mass measurements at the LHC using NLO+PS generators of increasing accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 458 [arXiv:1801.03944] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A.H. Hoang, C. Lepenik and M. Preisser, On the Light Massive Flavor Dependence of the Top Quark Mass, PoS(RADCOR2017)051 [arXiv:1802.04334] [INSPIRE].

  22. M. Czakon, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, High-precision differential predictions for top-quark pairs at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 082003 [arXiv:1511.00549] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Czakon, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, Dynamical scales for multi-TeV top-pair production at the LHC, JHEP 04 (2017) 071 [arXiv:1606.03350] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Czakon, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, fastNLO tables for NNLO top-quark pair differential distributions, arXiv:1704.08551 [INSPIRE].

  25. M. Czakon, D. Heymes, A. Mitov, D. Pagani, I. Tsinikos and M. Zaro, Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW, JHEP 10 (2017) 186 [arXiv:1705.04105] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Hollik and D. Pagani, The electroweak contribution to the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 093003 [arXiv:1107.2606] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J.H. Kühn, A. Scharf and P. Uwer, Weak Interactions in Top-Quark Pair Production at Hadron Colliders: An Update, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 014020 [arXiv:1305.5773] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Pagani, I. Tsinikos and M. Zaro, The impact of the photon PDF and electroweak corrections on \( t\overline{t} \) distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 479 [arXiv:1606.01915] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Denner and M. Pellen, NLO electroweak corrections to off-shell top-antitop production with leptonic decays at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2016) 155 [arXiv:1607.05571] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Gütschow, J.M. Lindert and M. Schönherr, Multi-jet merged top-pair production including electroweak corrections, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 317 [arXiv:1803.00950] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, Z.G. Si and P. Uwer, Top quark pair production and decay at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 690 (2004) 81 [hep-ph/0403035] [INSPIRE].

  32. K. Melnikov and M. Schulze, NLO QCD corrections to top quark pair production and decay at hadron colliders, JHEP 08 (2009) 049 [arXiv:0907.3090] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J.M. Campbell and R.K. Ellis, Top-Quark Processes at NLO in Production and Decay, J. Phys. G 42 (2015) 015005 [arXiv:1204.1513] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Brucherseifer, F. Caola and K. Melnikov, \( \mathcal{O}\left({\alpha}_s^2\right) \) corrections to fully-differential top quark decays, JHEP 04 (2013) 059 [arXiv:1301.7133] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Gao and A.S. Papanastasiou, Top-quark pair-production and decay at high precision, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 051501 [arXiv:1705.08903] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein and C. Schwinn, Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation, Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 695 [arXiv:1109.1536] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov and P. Nason, Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 612 [arXiv:1111.5869] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Ferroglia, S. Marzani, B.D. Pecjak and L.L. Yang, Boosted top production: factorization and resummation for single-particle inclusive distributions, JHEP 01 (2014) 028 [arXiv:1310.3836] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Broggio, A.S. Papanastasiou and A. Signer, Renormalization-group improved fully differential cross sections for top pair production, JHEP 10 (2014) 98 [arXiv:1407.2532] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. N. Kidonakis, High-order threshold corrections for top-pair and single-top production, in Proceedings, Meeting of the APS Division of Particles and Fields (DPF 2015), Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A., 4–8 August 2015 (2015) [arXiv:1509.07848] [INSPIRE].

  41. B.D. Pecjak, D.J. Scott, X. Wang and L.L. Yang, Resummed differential cross sections for top-quark pairs at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 202001 [arXiv:1601.07020] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit and S. Pozzorini, NLO QCD corrections to WWbb production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 052001 [arXiv:1012.3975] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit and S. Pozzorini, NLO QCD corrections to off-shell top-antitop production with leptonic decays at hadron colliders, JHEP 10 (2012) 110 [arXiv:1207.5018] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, A. van Hameren, C.G. Papadopoulos and M. Worek, Complete off-shell effects in top quark pair hadroproduction with leptonic decay at next-to-leading order, JHEP 02 (2011) 083 [arXiv:1012.4230] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. G. Heinrich, A. Maier, R. Nisius, J. Schlenk and J. Winter, NLO QCD corrections to \( {W}^{+}{W}^{-}b\overline{b} \) production with leptonic decays in the light of top quark mass and asymmetry measurements, JHEP 06 (2014) 158 [arXiv:1312.6659] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Denner and M. Pellen, Off-shell production of top-antitop pairs in the lepton+jets channel at NLO QCD, JHEP 02 (2018) 013 [arXiv:1711.10359] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. R. Frederix, Top Quark Induced Backgrounds to Higgs Production in the WW (*) → llνν Decay Channel at Next-to-Leading-Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 082002 [arXiv:1311.4893] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. F. Cascioli, S. Kallweit, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini, A unified NLO description of top-pair and associated Wt production, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2783 [arXiv:1312.0546] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, P. Nason and E. Re, Top-Pair Production and Decay at NLO Matched with Parton Showers, JHEP 04 (2015) 114 [arXiv:1412.1828] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. P. Nason, A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE].

  51. S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. S. Höche, F. Krauss, P. Maierhöfer, S. Pozzorini, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for top-quark pair production with up to two jets merged with a parton shower, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 74 [arXiv:1402.6293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. S. Höche, P. Maierhöfer, N. Moretti, S. Pozzorini and F. Siegert, Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for top-quark pair production with up to three jets, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 145 [arXiv:1607.06934] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. J. Bellm et al., Top Quark Production and Decay in HERWIG 7.1, arXiv:1711.11570 [INSPIRE].

  56. M.V. Garzelli, A. Kardos and Z. Trócsanyi, Hadroproduction of \( {W}^{+}{W}^{-}b\overline{b} \) at NLO accuracy matched with shower Monte Carlo programs, JHEP 08 (2014) 069 [arXiv:1405.5859] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. T. Ježo and P. Nason, On the Treatment of Resonances in Next-to-Leading Order Calculations Matched to a Parton Shower, JHEP 12 (2015) 065 [arXiv:1509.09071] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini, Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111601 [arXiv:1111.5206] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. T. Ježo, J.M. Lindert, P. Nason, C. Oleari and S. Pozzorini, An NLO+PS generator for \( t\overline{t} \) and Wt production and decay including non-resonant and interference effects, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 691 [arXiv:1607.04538] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. L. Buonocore, P. Nason and F. Tramontano, Heavy quark radiation in NLO+PS POWHEG generators, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 151 [arXiv:1711.06281] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, A.S. Papanastasiou, S. Prestel and P. Torrielli, Off-shell single-top production at NLO matched to parton showers, JHEP 06 (2016) 027 [arXiv:1603.01178] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. B. Chokoufé Nejad, W. Kilian, J.M. Lindert, S. Pozzorini, J. Reuter and C. Weiss, NLO QCD predictions for off-shell \( t\overline{t}\kern0.5em and\kern0.5em t\overline{t}H \) production and decay at a linear collider, JHEP 12 (2016)075 [arXiv:1609.03390] [INSPIRE].

  63. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the \( t\overline{t} \) → lepton+jets and \( t\overline{t} \) → dilepton channels using \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV ATLAS data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 330 [arXiv:1503.05427] [INSPIRE].

  64. T. Gleisberg et al., Event generation with SHERPA 1.1, JHEP 02 (2009) 007 [arXiv:0811.4622] [INSPIRE].

  65. G. Cullen et al., Automated One-Loop Calculations with GoSam, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1889 [arXiv:1111.2034] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. G. Cullen et al., GoSam-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calculations within the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3001 [arXiv:1404.7096] [INSPIRE].

  67. T. Binoth et al., A proposal for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tools and one-loop programs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1612 [arXiv:1001.1307] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. S. Alioli et al., Update of the Binoth Les Houches Accord for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tools and one-loop programs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 560 [arXiv:1308.3462] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, The Complex-mass scheme for perturbative calculations with unstable particles, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 160 (2006) 22 [hep-ph/0605312] [INSPIRE].

  70. S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP 09 (2012) 049 [arXiv:1111.1220] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. S. Höche, J. Huang, G. Luisoni, M. Schönherr and J. Winter, Zero and one jet combined next-to-leading order analysis of the top quark forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 014040 [arXiv:1306.2703] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. S. Höche, S. Kuttimalai, S. Schumann and F. Siegert, Beyond Standard Model calculations with Sherpa, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 135 [arXiv:1412.6478] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. K. Hamilton and P. Richardson, A simulation of QCD radiation in top quark decays, JHEP 02 (2007) 069 [hep-ph/0612236] [INSPIRE].

  74. C.G. Lester and D.J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 99 [hep-ph/9906349] [INSPIRE].

  75. A. Barr, C. Lester and P. Stephens, m T2 : The truth behind the glamour, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 2343 [hep-ph/0304226] [INSPIRE].

  76. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of lepton differential distributions and the top quark mass in \( t\overline{t} \) production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2017-044 (2017).

  77. J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001 [arXiv:1510.03865] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. S. Dulat et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 204 [arXiv:1412.3989] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].

  81. M. Jezabek and J.H. Kühn, Semileptonic Decays of Top Quarks, Phys. Lett. B 207 (1988) 91 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. A.A. Maier, Precision Measurements of the Top Quark Mass in the Dileptonic Top Quark Pair Decay Channel at ATLAS, Ph.D. Thesis, Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich, Germany [https://publications.mppmu.mpg.de/2016/MPP-2016-76/FullText.pdf].

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Föhringer Ring 6, 80805, München, Germany

    Gudrun Heinrich, Richard Nisius & Ludovic Scyboz

  2. Experimental Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland

    Andreas Maier

  3. IPPP, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K.

    Johannes Schlenk

  4. Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstraße 15, 12489, Berlin, Germany

    Markus Schulze

  5. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, U.S.A.

    Jan Winter

Authors
  1. Gudrun Heinrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Nisius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes Schlenk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Markus Schulze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ludovic Scyboz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jan Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gudrun Heinrich.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1709.08615

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heinrich, G., Maier, A., Nisius, R. et al. NLO and off-shell effects in top quark mass determinations. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)129

Download citation

  • Received: 13 March 2018

  • Revised: 15 June 2018

  • Accepted: 16 July 2018

  • Published: 19 July 2018

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)129

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • QCD Phenomenology
  • NLO Computations
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature