Computer Science > Computational Complexity
[Submitted on 17 Aug 2023 (v1), last revised 16 Feb 2024 (this version, v2)]
Title:Distribution-Free Proofs of Proximity
View PDFAbstract:Motivated by the fact that input distributions are often unknown in advance, distribution-free property testing considers a setting where the algorithmic task is to accept functions $f : [n] \to \{0,1\}$ with a certain property P and reject functions that are $\eta$-far from P, where the distance is measured according to an arbitrary and unknown input distribution $D \sim [n]$. As usual in property testing, the tester can only make a sublinear number of input queries, but as the distribution is unknown, we also allow a sublinear number of samples from the distribution D.
In this work we initiate the study of distribution-free interactive proofs of proximity (df-IPPs) in which the distribution-free testing algorithm is assisted by an all powerful but untrusted prover. Our main result is that for any problem P $\in$ NC, any proximity parameter $\eta > 0$, and any (trade-off) parameter $t\leq\sqrt{n}$, we construct a df-IPP for P with respect to $\eta$, that has query and sample complexities $t+O(1/\eta)$, and communication complexity $\tilde{O}(n/t + 1/\eta)$. For t as above and sufficiently large $\eta$ (namely, when $\eta > t/n$), this result matches the parameters of the best-known general purpose IPPs in the standard uniform setting. Moreover, for such t, its parameters are optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors under reasonable cryptographic assumptions for the same regime of $\eta$ as the uniform setting, i.e., when $\eta \geq 1/t$.
For small $\eta$ (i.e., $\eta< t/n$), our protocol has communication complexity $\Omega(1/\eta)$, which is worse than the $\tilde{O}(n/t)$ communication complexity of the uniform IPPs (with the same query complexity). To improve on this gap, we show that for IPPs over specialised, but large distribution families, such as sufficiently smooth distributions and product distributions, the communication complexity reduces to $\tilde{O}(n/t^{1-o(1)})$.
Submission history
From: Hugo Aaronson [view email][v1] Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:11:50 UTC (171 KB)
[v2] Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:18:47 UTC (163 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.