FAQ

International Journal of Contemporary Management

Logo Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Around Learning and Industry 4.0 in Management Theory

Data publikacji: 26.03.2018

International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2017, Numer 16(4), s. 185 - 206

https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.17.044.8267

Autorzy

,
Małgorzata Rozkwitalska
WSB University in Gdansk, Poland
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Jan Slavik
Brno University of Technology, the Czech Republic
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Abstrakt

Background. Management theories are products of their environment. Thus, the social, political, economic and technological forces present in a given time and locale create demand for a given theory and shape it. 
Research aims. In this perspective paper the authors present how learning has evolved in management theories over the years and how challenges imposed by Industry 4.0 may impact the concepts of learning. 
Methodology. The paper is based on an overview of literature and experts’ work. First, the authors refer to learning in management theories from the birth of the field until the present day. Second, they portray Industry 4.0 and the current stage of implementation of its ideas. Then, they indicate the macro-environmental and workforce challenges produced by Industry 4.0. Finally, they attempt to look at the role of learning in Industry 4.0 and whether there is a need for a new theory concerning learning for the fourth industrial revolution.
Key findings. The discourse of the paper suggests that new challenges require at least a modification of the existing theories concerned with learning of individuals and organisations as well as their further improvements.

Bibliografia

Antonacopoulou, E.P., & Gabriel, Y. (2006). Emotion, Learning and Organizational Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14(5), 435–451, https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005874 [access: 23.05.2009].

Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Massachusetts: Reading, Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Batras, D., Duff, C., & Smith, B.J. (2016). Organizational Change Theory: Implications for Health Promotion Practice. Health Promotion International, 31(1), 231–241, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau098 [access: 3.04. 2017].

Blanchet, M., & Rinn, T. (2016). The Industrie 4.0 Transition Quantified. How the Fourth Industrial Revolution is Reshuffling the Economic, Social and Industrial Model. Munich. Retrieved from https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_industry_40_20160609.pdf [access: 12.12. 2017].

Braungart, M.M., & Braungart, R.G. (2003). Applying Learning Theories to Healthcare Practice. In: Nurse as Educator: Principles of Teaching and Learning for Nursing Practice (pp. 43–71). Sadbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the Planned Approach to Change: A Re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977–1002, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x [access: 2.09.2017].

Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J.E. (2009). Learning Behaviours in the Workplace: The Role of High-quality Interpersonal Relationships and Psychological Safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 98 (November), 81–98, https://doi.org/10.1002/sres [access: 23.03.2016].

Daft, R.L. (2010). Management (5th ed.). Mason, Ohio: South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Davis, C., Edmunds, E., & Kelly-Bateman, V. (2010). Connectivism. In: M. Orey (ed.), Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology (pp. 62–65). Zurich: The Global Text Project.

Easterby-Smith, M., Araujo, L., & Burgoyne, J. (eds.) (2004). Organizational Learning and Learning Organization. Developments in Theory and Practice. London and New Delhi: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

Gill, S. (2013). Industry Prepares for the Next Industrial Revolution. Control Engineering Europe. Retrieved from http://www.controlengeurope.com/article/58949/Industry-prepares-for-the-next--industrial-revolution-.aspx [access: 14.03.2016].

Hecklau, F., Galeitzke, M., Flachs, S., & Kohl, H. (2016). Holistic Approach for Human Resource Management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102 [access: 15.04. 2017].

Holtgrewe, U. (2014). New New Technologies: The Future and the Present of Work in Information and Communication Technology. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(1), 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12025 [access: 15.04.2017].

Illeris, K. (2009). Introduction. In: K. Illeris (ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning. Learning Theorists… in Their Own Words (pp. 1–6). London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a person in society: learning to be me. In: K. Illeris (ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning. Learning theorists … in Their Own Words (pp. 21–34). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Retrieved from http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf [access: 15.04.2017].

Karain, J. (2016). Populists Around the World are Gaining Ground, and It’s Not Looking Good for the Liberals. Retrieved from https://qz.com/835353/populists-around-the-world-are-gaining-ground-and-its-not-looking-good-for-the-liberals/. [access: 25.01.2017].

Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning Theory of the Future or Vestige of the Past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1–13.

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industrie 4.0. Wirtschaftsomformatik, 6(4), 239–242.

Lien, B.Y.-H., Hung, R.Y., & McLean, G.N. (2007). Organizational Learning as an Organization Development Intervention in Six High-Technology Firms in Taiwan: An Exploratory Case Study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(2), 211–228, https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq [access: 15.04.2017].

Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Luetk, K.L., & Bolle, M. (2015). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0. How Will Technology Transform the Industrial Workforce Through 2025? Retrieved from https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/technology-business-transformation-engineered-products-infrastructure-man-machine-industry-4/#chapter1 [access: 1.02.2017].

Marik, V., Buncek, M., Czesana, V., Holoubek, J., Kopicova, M., Krechl, J., Valasek, M. (2015). National Initiative Industry 4.0.Praha. Retrieved from http://www.spcr.cz/images/priloha001-2.pdf [access: 22.03.2016].

Mariotti, F. (2012). Exploring Interorganizational Learning: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(4), 215–221, https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm [access: 22.03.2016].

Maruta, R. (2014). The Creation and Management of Organizational Knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 67, 26–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.06.012 [access: 22.03.2016].

Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation an Personality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

McLean, G.N. (2009). What is Organization Development? In: Organization Development: Principles, Processes, Performance (pp. 1–32). Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10967491003756831 [access: 12.05.2017].

Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C.F., & Park, H.J. (2003). MNC Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586–599, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400056 [access: 13.04.2017].

Mozzato, A.R., & Bitencourt, C.C. (2014). Understanding Interorganizational Learning Based on Social Spaces and Learning Episodes. BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 11(3), 284–301, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2014370 [access: 1.06.2017].

Nilsson, J., & Eriksson, K. (2008). The Role of the Individual – A Key to Learning in Preparedness Organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(3), 135–142, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00542.x [access: 2.04.2017].

Phillips, D.C., & Soltis, J.F. (2009). Perspectives on Learning (5th ed.). New York–London: Teaching College Columbia University.

Roper, L., & Pettit, J. (2002). Development and the Learning Organisation: An Introduction. Development in Practice, 12(3–4), 258–271, https://doi.org/10.1080/0961450220149654 [access: 1.02.2016].

Sánchez Bengoa, D., Kaufmann, H.R., & Vrontis, D. (2012). A New Organisational Memory for Cross-cultural Knowledge Management. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 336–351, https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211247080 [access: 4.06.2017].

Sawchuk, P.H. (2013). Contested Learning in Walfare Work. A Study of Mind, Political Economy and the Labour Process. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schein, E. (1972). Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Rodenhauser, T., & Marks, A. (2015). Promoting Work-based Learning Through INDUSTRY 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 32, 82–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.213 [access: 4.06.2017].

Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu, H., & Li, Y. (2016). Management Approaches for Industry 4.0: A Human Resource Management Perspective. In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) (pp. 5309–5316). Vancouver, BC, https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2016.7748365 [access: 4.06.2017].

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Intructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm [access: 14.03.2015].

Siemens Prepares the Way for Industry 4.0.(2013). Hanover: Siemens. Retrieved from https://www.siemens.com/press/pool/de/pressemitteilungen/2013/industry/I20130457e.pdf [access: 12.05.2016].

Slavik, J. (2015). Internal Corporate Communication in the Era of New Digital Technology and Industry 4.0. In: Specific research workshop 2015 (pp. 68–73). Brno: Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management.

Venables, M. (2016). Are We There Yet? Works Management, 69(3), 28–30.

Wenger, E. (2009). A Social Theory of Learning. In: I. Knud (ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning. Learning Theorists… in Their Own Words (pp. 209–218). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Whyte, W. (1956). The Organization Man. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Informacje

Informacje: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2017, s. 185 - 206

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Around Learning and Industry 4.0 in Management Theory

Autorzy

WSB University in Gdansk, Poland

Brno University of Technology, the Czech Republic

Publikacja: 26.03.2018

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Małgorzata Rozkwitalska (Autor) - 50%
Jan Slavik (Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 1479

Liczba pobrań: 1018