A Study on the Water Management Knowledge of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of Stormwater Resilience—A Case Study of Changqi Ancient Village in Guangdong, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- The SWMM is primarily used for stormwater simulations in urban areas. How can the SWMM be adapted to stormwater management in traditional villages? Can Changqi Ancient Village continue to function during a once-in-a-century rainfall event? If so, what lessons can be learned from its water management in terms of ecological and social resilience?
- (2)
- From a socio-ecological resilience perspective, what resilience characteristics are reflected in traditional village stormwater management, and how does the village demonstrate these characteristics?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
2.2. Research Methods
2.2.1. Field Research
2.2.2. Establishment of the SWMM
- (1)
- Conceptualization of the Drainage System in the Study Area
- (2)
- Rainfall Specification
- (3)
- Parameter Settings
3. Results
3.1. Ecological Resilience: Adaptability and Network Connectivity
- (1)
- Strategic Site Selection: Mitigating the Direct Impact of Rivers
- (2)
- A Dense Pond Network: Maintaining Dynamic Water Balance
- (3)
- The Hilltop Location: Establishing Vertical Flood Control Systems
3.2. Social Resilience: Self-Organization
- (1)
- Strong Flood Control Awareness Among Villagers: Actively Improving Public Facilities
- (2)
- Establishing Village Regulations: Promoting Household Water Management Awareness
- (3)
- Constructing Spiritual Spaces: Sustaining Local Cultural Customs
3.3. Socio-Ecological Resilience: An Adaptive Cycle
- (1)
- The Growth Phase
- (2)
- The Stability Phase
- (3)
- The Decline Phase
- (4)
- The Revival Phase
4. Discussion and Conclusions
4.1. Discussion
4.2. Study Limitations
4.3. Conclusions
- (1)
- The SWMM effectively quantifies stormwater management in traditional villages.
- (2)
- From an ecological resilience perspective, the village’s geographical location is crucial. The terrain, along with the rainwater regulation system consisting of rivers, ponds, ditches, and permeable surfaces, significantly influences the village’s drainage performance.
- (3)
- From a social resilience perspective, community participation is essential to the long-term stability of the village, including post-disaster collective fundraising to repair stormwater management facilities, the establishment of local rules, and the restoration of spiritual sites.
- (4)
- From a socio-ecological resilience perspective, the adaptive cycle of the socio-ecological system is evident. The geographic environment and the industrial economy are the primary factors influencing the ecological spatial structure of Changqi Ancient Village, while positive interaction between nature and society ensures dynamic balance in this system.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liew, Y.S.; Mat Desa, S.; Md Noh, M.N.; Tan, M.L.; Zakaria, N.A.; Chang, C.K. Assessing the Effectiveness of Mitigation Strategies for Flood Risk Reduction in the Segamat River Basin, Malaysia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Hu, M.; Chen, X.; Wang, F.; Liu, B.; Huo, Z. An approach of using social media data to detect the real time spatio-temporal variations of urban waterlogging. J. Hydrol. 2023, 625, 130128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Garchagen, M.; Deng, X. A comparative analysis on flood risk assessment and management performances between Beijing and Munich. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2024, 104, 107319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.-p.; Li, Z.-x.; Fu, G. The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z. Research on the Optimization and Resilience Enhancement Path of Urban Gray-Green Infrastructure. Master’s Thesis, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Lei, Z.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, T. Water management wisdom of traditional villages in Gully Region of Loess Plateau and its planning inspiration. Mod. Urban Res. 2022, 9, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
- Berkes, F. Sacred Ecology; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Q. The protection of China’s ancient cities from flood damage. Disasters 1989, 13, 193–227. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, H.; Chen, Y.; Xie, W.; Qiu, W.; Zhang, C. An Exploration of the Wisdom of Ecological Water Control in Yujia Ancient Village and Its Contemporary Enlightenment. Mod. Urban Stud. 2018, 2, 40–44+52. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, D. A Study on the Spatial Morphology of Water Systems in Traditional Villages in the Pearl River Delta Based on Flood Control and Drainage. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, B.; Holling, C.S.; Carpenter, S.R.; Kinzig, A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holling, C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. In Foundations of Socio-Environmental Research: Legacy Readings with Commentaries; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, M.; Hou, X.; Wang, J. Spatial resilience mechanism and practical enlightenment of Jiangnan water network based on traditional ecological wisdom. Landsc. Archit. 2018, 25, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T. New progress in the research of resilient cities. Int. Urban Plan. 2017, 32, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y. Resilient Governance: Practice and Exploration of Resilient City Construction in China. Public Adm. Policy Rev. 2021, 10, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y. Rural Planning from the Perspective of Stormwater Resilience. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M. A Study on the Spatial Morphology of Traditional Water Town Settlements in the Pearl River Delta from the Perspective of Resilience. Master’s Thesis, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, H.; Li, S. Research on the construction intensity of rainwater runoff purification facilities in mountainous villages based on SWMM simulation. Cent. China Constr. 2022, 40, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Kang, J. Participatory Framework for Urban Pluvial Flood Modeling in the Digital Twin Era. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 108, 105496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Lin, J.; He, X.; Lin, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X. Assessing the scale effect of urban vertical patterns on urban waterlogging: An empirical study in Shenzhen. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2024, 106, 107486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Committee, Guangdong Provincial Local Chronicles Compilation. Guangdong Province—Geographical Records; Guangdong People’s Publishing House: Guangzhou, China, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, H. The formation and development of the Pearl River Delta. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 1982, 4, 595–607. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q. Sanshui County Annals; Sanshui County Records: Sanshui, China, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, B. Guangdong Natural Disasters Chronicle; Natural Disasters in Guangdong: Guangzhou, China, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Sanshui County Water Conservancy Chronicle; Sanshui County Local Chronicles Compilation Committee Office, Sanshui County Water Conservancy and Electric Power Bureau: Foshan, China, 1992.
- Jun, Y. Lubao Town Journal; South China University of Technology Press: Guangzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Guangdong Meteorological Disaster Prevention Technology Service Centre, G.M.B., Foshan City, Guangdong Province. Formulas and Charts for Calculating Rainstorm Intensity in Sanshui District, Foshan City. 2016. Available online: https://max.book118.com/html/2021/0729/5110314042003321.shtm (accessed on 25 July 2024).
- Zhi, S.; Song, L.; Luo, J.; Wu, K. Storm intensity calculation system and its applications. Aeronautical 2000, 26, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y. China 30 m Resolution Copernicus DEM Elevation Slope Aspect Dataset. 2015. Available online: http://www.geodata.cn/data/datadetails.html?dataguid=65449238360177 (accessed on 25 July 2024). [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Ma, A.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L. Cross-resolution national-scale land-cover mapping based on noisy label learning: A case study of China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 118, 103265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossman, L.A. Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual; version 5.0; National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2010.
- Horton, R.E. Analysis of runoff-plat experiments with varying infiltration-capacity. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1939, 20, 693–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Wu, C.; Li, H.; Chen, G. Study on Storm-Water Management of Grassed Swales and Permeable Pavement Based on SWMM. Water 2017, 9, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, T.; Jia, H.; Wang, Z.; Mao, X.; Xu, C. SWMM-based methodology for block-scale LID-BMPs planning based on site-scale multi-objective optimization: A case study in Tianjin. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Xia, J.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Tan, Q. Performance assessment of sponge city infrastructure on stormwater outflows using isochrone and SWMM models. J. Hydrol. 2021, 597, 126151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X. Research on the Modern Planning Concept in the Construction of Hakka Feng Shui in Ancient Villages in Southern Gannan Province: A Case Study of Ruijin Mixi Village. Master’s Thesis, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, X.; Wang, D.; Luan, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, H. SWMM-based rainfall-runoff simulations in large-scale urban area with no pipeline-flow observations: Ⅱ: Model calibration and analysis of rainfall-runolf simulations. Adv. Water Sci. 2020, 31, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Ye, C. Simulation of urban flooding/waterlogging processes: Principle, modles and prospects. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2021, 52, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Xia, J.; Chen, Q.; Hou, J. SWMM-based urban flood modelling and risk evaluaion. J. Catastrophology 2018, 33, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S.; Chen, B.; Zhao, Q. Resilient Thinking: Sustainability of Socio-Ecological Systems in a Changing World; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Holling, C.S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- L, Ming. Coupled Optimization of Climate Adaptability of Urban Grey and Green Infrastructure: A Case Study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Master’s Thesis, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China, 2023.
Village Name 1 | Dike Name 1 | Breach of Dike 1 (DD) | Collapsed Houses 1 (Rooms) | Number of Deaths 1 (Persons) | Number of Persons Affected 1 (Persons) | Flooded Farmland 1 (Acres) | Restoration Funds 1 (Yuan) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qingtang | Qingtang Wai | 294 | 413 | 5 | 1963 | 2256 | 213,873 |
Yongfeng | YongfengWai | 165.4 | 250 | 11 | 8632 | 4916 | 23,000 |
Sizhou | Sizhou Wai | 30.5 | 129 | 1 | 1653 | 1094 | 470 |
Cuntou | Cuntou Wai | 66.45 | 187 | 2 | 1969 | 3305 | 3000 |
Xiabu | Xiabu Wai | 115 | 1549 | 1 | 8853 | 7430 | 25,300 |
Changzhou | Changzhou Wai | 276.2 | 1364 | 1 | 12,543 | 8920 | 14,378 |
total | - | 947.55 | 3892 | 21 | 35,613 | 27,921 | 280,021 |
Data Type | Specific Parameters | Data Sources |
---|---|---|
Precipitation Data | Rainfall Intensity and Duration | According to the rainfall intensity formula for Sanshui District, Foshan City, the calculation formula is as follows [27,28]: |
Sub-catchment data | Sub-catchment area and average slope | The sub-catchment areas could be delineated in SWMM software version 5 (Figure 5). The area and average slope of each sub-catchment were based on the region, utilizing 30 m resolution elevation data downloaded from the National Earth System Science Data Center, National Science and Technology Infrastructure of China [29]. These parameters were computed within a Geographic Information System (GIS). |
Width | According to the formula for characteristic width (width): . | |
% Imperv | Combining current land use status and the national 10 m resolution land cover dataset released by Wuhan University in 2020, the imperviousness of each sub-basin in the study area was calculated [30]. | |
N-Imperv; N-perv; Dstore-Imperv; Dstore-Perv; and %Zero-Imperv | The initial values were set according to the parameter values recommended in the SWMM manual [31]. | |
Trench data | Length, shape, dimensions, inlet offset, and outlet offset | Relevant information was obtained through field surveys and data provided by the village committee of Changqi Ancient Village. |
Roughness | The initial values were set according to the parameter values recommended in the SWMM manual [31]. | |
Pond data | Size and depth of ponds; size, position, and number of outlets and inlets | Relevant information was obtained through field surveys and data provided by the village committee of Changqi Ancient Village. |
Terrain data | Elevation terrain | A 1:1000 topographic map provided by the Changqi Ancient Village committee. |
Land use data | Land use types and areas | The land use data originate from the national 10 m resolution land cover dataset released by Wuhan University in 2020 [30]. It was integrated with Google Maps and field surveys to delineate the corresponding study area in the GIS for this paper. |
Junction data | Maximum depth; initial depth | Relevant information was obtained through field surveys and data provided by the village committee of Changqi Ancient Village. |
Pond Label | Pond Area 1 (ha) | Initial Depth 1 (m) | Pond Depth 1 (m) | Pond Label | Pond Area 1 (ha) | Initial Depth 1 (m) | Pond Depth 1 (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.738 | 0.5 | 3 | 8 | 0.292 | 1 | 3 |
2 | 0.272 | 1 | 2.5 | 9 | 0.423 | 1 | 4 |
3 | 0.985 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0.735 | 1 | 3 |
4 | 0.998 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0.504 | 1 | 3 |
5 | 1.123 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 0.149 | 1 | 3 |
6 | 0.798 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 1.307 | 1 | 3 |
7 | 0.999 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 2.317 | 0.5 | 3 |
Position 1 | Depth of Trench 1 (m) |
---|---|
Trench close to the mountain | 0.5–1 |
Trench away from the mountain | 0.3–0.5 |
Empirical Parameters | Initial Values |
---|---|
N-Imperv | 0.014 |
N-Perv | 0.1 |
Dstore-Imperv | 0.2 |
Dstore-Perv | 0.25 |
%Zero-Imperv | 25 |
Max. Infil. Rate | 5 |
Min. Infil. Rate | 4.74 |
Decay Constant (1/h) | 4 |
Drying Time (day) | 7 |
Pond Serial Number | Maximum Volume/ 1000 m3 | Overflow (Yes or No) | Percentage of Maximum Storage Capacity of Ponds Around Changqi Ancient Village Under 24 h Short-Duration Storms of Different Return Periods/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100a | 50a | 20a | 10a | 5a | 1a | |||
JT1 | 2.320 | No | 77 | 76 | 73 | 71 | 68 | 59 |
JT2 | 2.222 | No | 89 | 86 | 81 | 78 | 73 | 60 |
JT3 | 2.600 | No | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 86 | 77 |
JT4 | 2.600 | No | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 |
JT5 | 2.600 | No | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 |
JT6 | 2.500 | No | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 |
JT7 | 2.500 | No | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 |
JT8 | 2.500 | No | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 |
JT9 | 2.186 | No | 63 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 63 |
JT10 | 2.194 | No | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 |
JT11 | 1.980 | No | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 |
JT12 | 1.132 | No | 69 | 66 | 63 | 60 | 57 | 48 |
JT13 | 1.776 | No | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 81 |
JT14 | 0.884 | No | 44 | 42 | 39 | 36 | 33 | 26 |
River Item Name | Station Name | Maximum Water Level (m) | Minimum Water Level (m) | Maximum Tide Level | Mean Tidal Range at High Tide (m) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water Level | Day, Month, Year | Water Level | Day, Month, Year | Tide Level | Day, Month, Year | |||
Xijiang River | Makou | 9.584 | 27 June 1968 | −0.546 | 20 February 1955 | 1.30 | 19 January 1972 | |
Beijiang River | Datang | 13.04 | 9 May 1968 | 0.84 | 13 March 1960 | - | - | |
Beijiang River | Lubao | 11.697 | 27 June 1968 | 0.207 | 13 March 1960 | - | - | |
Beijiang River | Mafang | - | - | 0.037 | 24 March 1955 | 0.90 | 23 September 1957 | 0.15 |
Beijiang River | Sanshui (Hekou) | 9.897 | 27 June 1968 | −0.943 −0.493 | 1 February 1902 20 February 1955 | 1.38 | 9 November 1972 | 0.26 |
Beijiang River | Xinan | 9.09 | 27 June 1968 | −0.64 | 20 February 1955 | - | - | |
Sze Yin Kau | Ganggen | 10.048 | 27 June 1968 | −0.502 | 20 February 1955 | 1.20 | 28 May 1964 | 0.26 |
Jinshui River | Dabutang | 12.85 | 27 June 1968 |
Alleyway Name | Node Name | Total Flood Volume/ 1 × 106 ltr | Depth of Surface Water/cm | Minor Ponding? (Yes or No) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical 1 Alley | J65 | 4.223 | 8.10 | Yes |
Vertical 7 Alley | J161 | 1.613 | 5.37 | Yes |
Vertical 10 Alley | J185 | 1.200 | 5.06 | Yes |
Vertical 14 Alley | J212 | 1.003 | 3.34 | Yes |
Horizontal 9 Alleyway | J98 | 1.305 | 5.72 | Yes |
Alleyway Name Time | 11:45 | 12:00 | 12:15 | 12:30 | 12:45 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical 1 Alley | |||||
Vertical 7 Alley | |||||
Vertical 10 Alley | |||||
Vertical 14 Alley | |||||
Horizontal 9 Alleyway |
Adaptive Cycle Stages | Village Spatial Layout | Functional Organization Diagram | Evolution Diagram Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|
Growth Phase | |||
Stable Phase | |||
Decline Phase | |||
Revival Phase |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, X.; He, S.; Li, Z. A Study on the Water Management Knowledge of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of Stormwater Resilience—A Case Study of Changqi Ancient Village in Guangdong, China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9807. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229807
Jiang X, He S, Li Z. A Study on the Water Management Knowledge of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of Stormwater Resilience—A Case Study of Changqi Ancient Village in Guangdong, China. Sustainability. 2024; 16(22):9807. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229807
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Xing, Sihua He, and Ziang Li. 2024. "A Study on the Water Management Knowledge of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of Stormwater Resilience—A Case Study of Changqi Ancient Village in Guangdong, China" Sustainability 16, no. 22: 9807. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229807