Next Article in Journal
Study of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Mechanical Behavior under High Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
Production of Biopolymeric Microparticles to Improve Cannabigerol Bioavailability
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Rock Unloading Strength Based on PSO-XGBoost Hybrid Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Thermochemical Treatments on Electrical Conductivity of Donor-Doped Strontium Titanate Sr(Ln)TiO3 Ceramics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Fluorinated Hydrophobic Rare–Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Rd, Richardson, TX 75080, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 June 2024 / Revised: 15 August 2024 / Accepted: 23 August 2024 / Published: 26 August 2024

Abstract

:
Tuning a material’s hydrophobicity is desirable in several industrial applications, such as hydrocarbon storage, separation, selective CO2 capture, oil spill cleanup, and water purification. The introduction of fluorine into rare-earth (RE) metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) can make them hydrophobic. In this work, the linker bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA) was used to make highly fluorinated MOFs. The reaction of the TTA and RE3+ (RE: Y, Gd, or Eu) ions resulted in the primitive cubic structure (pcu) exhibiting RE dimer nodes (RE-TTA-pcu). The crystal structure of the RE-TTA-pcu was obtained. The use of the 2-fluorobenzoic acid in the synthesis resulted in fluorinated hexaclusters in the face-centered cubic (fcu) framework (RE-TTA-fcu), analogous to the UiO-66 MOF. The RE-TTA-fcu has fluorine on the linker as well as in the cluster. The MOFs were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and contact angle measurements.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrophobic materials, particularly hydrophobic metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), are desirable for many applications, such as carbon dioxide capture and water purification [1,2,3,4]. The hydrophobicity of the material depends on the surface energy of the material and these energies range from 6 millinewtons per meter (mN/m) to a few thousand mN/m [1]. The -CF3 groups are known to have the lowest surface energies of 6–7 mN/m for fully covered surfaces [5]. The exchange of one fluorine in the -CF3 groups almost doubles the surface energy to 15 mN/m. The methyl group (-CH3) has a free energy of 20 mN/m and is still considered a hydrophobic group. Generally, metals and metal oxides exhibit high surface energies, such as MgO having a surface energy of 1200 mN/m and silicon has a surface energy of 1240 mN/m [6]. Hence, the lowest surface energies are exhibited in the highly fluorinated surfaces. Decreasing the surface energy is the key to achieving high hydrophobicity in materials. In addition to hydrophobicity, organofluorine molecules are resistant to environmental oxidation [3].
Rare-earth metal–organic frameworks (RE-MOFs) are desirable due to their unique electronic, magnetic, and optical properties [7,8,9]. Rare-earth ions have high coordination numbers, ranging from 7 to 12 [9]. This high coordination number offers opportunities to prepare MOFs’ structures not observed in transition metals [10,11]. Many of the coordination sites can be occupied by the solvent molecules, and the removal of the solvent molecules may result in open metal sites [12]. These open metal sites can be utilized for selective guest molecule capture or sensing [13]. Recently, it was found that fluorinated triclusters, hexaclusters, or nonaclusters can be introduced in the RE-MOFs using organofluorine molecules in the synthesis [14,15,16,17]. In this work, highly fluorinated MOFs based on fluorinated RE hexaclusters and the fluorinated organic linker 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA) were prepared (Figure 1). The organic linker, 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA), has two hydrophobic -CF3 groups, making it a good candidate for fluorinated RE-MOFs. The hexacluster consists of six RE metal ions bridged by eight fluoride ions, having a formula of RE6X8.
In this work, two types of RE-MOFs (RE = Y, Gd, or Eu) have been prepared. The reaction of 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA) with RE(III) ions resulted in an MOF with primitive cubic (pcu) topology named RE-TTA-pcu [18]. The RE-TTA-pcu is a three-dimensional microporous framework with binuclear RE nodes. The same reaction, in the presence of 2-fluorobenzoic acid, resulted in the UiO-66 analogue MOF with face-centered cubic (fcu) topology, named RE-TTA-fcu [14]. RE-TTA-fcu has metal hexaclusters bridged by hydroxy or fluoride ions (Figure 1).

2. Experimental

Materials and Methods

The following materials were purchased from Fisher Scientific and Ambeed and used without further purification: europium(III) acetate hydrate (Eu(CH3CO2)3·6H2O, 99.9%), gadolinium(III) nitrate hexahydrate (Gd(NO3)3·6H2O, 99.9%), yttrium(III) nitrate hexahydrate (Y(NO3)3·6H2O, 99.9%), 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA) (97%), nitric acid (ACS grade), N,N-dimethylformamide (ACS grade), 2-fluorobenzoic acid (97%). The ultra-high-purity gases (N2, CO2) for the gas adsorption analysis were purchased from Airgas.
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on a D8-QUEST X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a Mo IμS microfocus X-ray source (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 200 K using an Oxford Cryosystems low-temperature device. Detailed crystallographic data are provided in Table 1 and Tables S1–S6. The X-ray photoelectron spectra were collected on a PHI VersaProbe II Scanning XPS Microprobe (Physical Electronics Inc, Chanhassen, MN, USA) equipped with Al Kα X-ray source (Ep = 1486.7 eV) at a pressure of 1.6 × 10–9 Torr. The high-resolution spectra were collected at the pass energy of 23.5 eV with a step size of 0.2 eV. The MOF samples were mounted on a double-sided copper tape and sputtered with metallic gold for charge reference. The data were processed with CasaXPS software (v 2.3) and binding energies were doubly calibrated to adventitious C1s at 284.8 eV and Au 4f7/2 at 83.95 eV. A Bruker Avance III™ HD 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Germany) was used to acquire the 19F NMR data at 298 K. The data were analyzed with TopSpin 4.1.0. for the 19F NMR spectra. A total of 10 mg of the MAF was digested in 20 µL solution of 10% D2SO4/D2O, and the mixture was added to 1 mL of DMSO-d6. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were collected on an Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Cu Kα radiation, with a scan rate of 2°/min and a step size of 0.04°. The simulated XRD patterns were generated from the CIF files using the crystal structure visualization tool CCDC Mercury. SEM and EDX were performed on a Zeiss EVO LS SEM (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and an Aztec Instruments Oxford EDX. The water contact angles were measured using the Dataphysics Optical Contact Angle Measuring System (Future Digital Scientific Corp., New York, NY, USA). Thermogravimetric analysis was conducted using an SDT Q600 (TA Instruments New Castle, DE, USA). The samples were then heated from room temperature to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under air, with a flow rate of 20 mL/min. Detailed experimental procedures are provided in the supporting information.
The RE-TTA-pcu was prepared by dissolving Eu(III) acetate hydrate (34.2 mg, 0.104 mmol) and TTA (18 mg, 0.0596 mmol) in 11 mL of DMF. Concentrated nitric acid (0.05 mL) was added to the mixture and sonicated for two minutes. The reaction mixture was heated in a 20 mL glass vial for 24 h at 80 °C. Transparent colorless rectangular crystals were obtained. The crystals were washed with 5 mL of DMF (3x) and dried at 80 °C overnight. The yttrium and gadolinium MOFs were prepared using the same procedure by replacing the europium salt with the equivalent moles of the respective metal salts.
The RE-TTA-fcu was prepared by mixing Eu(III) acetate hydrate (34.2 mg, 0.104 mmol) and TTA (18 mg, 0.0596 mmol) in 11 mL of DMF. Then, 2-fluorobenzoic acid (240 mg, 1.71 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture. Concentrated nitric acid (0.10 mL) was added to lower the solution. The mixture was heated in a 20 mL glass vial at 120 °C for 24 h. Transparent colorless polygonal crystals were obtained, washed with 5 mL DMF (3x), and dried at 80 °C for 24 h. The yttrium and gadolinium MOFs were prepared using the same procedure by replacing the europium salt with the equivalent moles of the respective metal salts.

3. Results and Discussion

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that Eu-TTA-pcu is a three-dimensional framework, which crystallizes in the triclinic P 1 ¯ space group with a chemical formula {[Eu(TTA)1.5(DMF)]·(H2O)·(DMF)}n. The detailed crystallographic information is provided in Table 1. The asymmetric unit consists of one Eu(III) coordinated to two DMF molecules, which are two-fold disordered, three half TTA molecules, and a lattice water molecule. The TTA carboxylates exhibit η2 bidentate coordination modes. Two half TTA molecules bridge the neighboring Eu(III) ions via μ211 coordination of the carboxylate group to make a metal dimer node. The third TTA molecule exhibits a bidentate chelating coordination (η2) to a single Eu(III) ion and connects the consecutive dimer nodes. The Eu(III) ion exhibits a coordination number of nine. The RE-TTA-pcu is a three-dimensional framework with the primitive cubic (pcu) topology (Figure 2). The crystal structure packing reveals that the RE-TTA-pcu is a porous framework, having cavities with a diameter of 4.5 Å. The crystal packing shows that the ab-plane is densely packed, and the pores are completely blocked along the c-direction (Figure 2b).
The crystal packing of the RE-TTA-pcu shows that the framework is microporous with two-dimensional channels. These channels can be viewed along the a-direction and the [111] vector, as shown in Figure 3. The channels along the a-direction have a rectangular shape with the pore dimension of 4.5 × 3.6 Å2. The channels along the [111] vector are narrow, with the pore dimension of 2.6 × 2.8 Å2, making them inaccessible for gases such as nitrogen (d = 3.64 Å) and carbon dioxide (d = 3.34 Å). Theoretically, 41.3% of the unit cell volume is vacant if all the guest molecules are removed. However, gas adsorption analysis shows no uptake for both nitrogen and carbon dioxide. This is because of the coordinated DMF molecules, which are difficult to remove. The CO2 adsorption analysis shows that Gd-TTA-fcu is a porous structure with a Langmuir surface area of 58 m2/g (Figure S6). Nonetheless, RE-BDC-fcu MOFs have surface areas of up to 1200 m2/g [19,20].
The RE-TTA-fcu is a three-dimensional framework isostructural to the Ho-UiO-66 [14]. The powder XRD patterns of the RE-TTA-fcu are consistent with the simulated diffraction pattern for the Ho-UiO-66 (Figure 4b). This is due to the similar coordination geometry of the terephthalic acid and TTA. The linker TTA is a derivative of terephthalic acid with two (-CF3) groups present on the ortho positions to the carboxylate group. RE-TTA-pcu MOFs also exhibit a good match with the simulated XRD pattern from the Eu-TTA-pcu (Figure 4a). The good match with the simulated patterns confirms the phase purity of the RE-TTA-pcu MOFs.
Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out to analyze the thermal stabilities of the MOFs (Figure S1). It was found that all the MOFs exhibit thermal stability of up to 300 °C. The RE-TTA-pcu TGA curves exhibit a very small change of 2–3% when heated to 100 °C, showing a very small amount of water present in the pores. A second change of ~2 wt% after 150 °C was assigned to the loss of uncoordinated DMF molecules. A continuous mass loss after 170 °C indicates the loss of coordinated DMF molecules. A sudden mass loss was observed at ~320 °C, showing the decomposition of the MOFs. The TGA curves of the RE-TTA-fcu MOFs exhibited a 5–7 wt% loss on the initial heating up to 100 °C, indicating the presence of water molecules. A mass loss of 9 wt% after 150 °C was assigned to the DMF molecules. The RE-TTA-fcu MOFs decompose at ~325 °C and a higher residual mass was observed in comparison to the RE-TTA-pcu. The residual masses for RE-TTA-pcu ranged from 29–39 wt% in comparison to RE-TTA-fcu having 21–29 wt%. The high residual mass arises due to the presence of the metal hexaclusters.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis (XPS) was used to assess the elemental identities, chemical nature of the framework, and the purity of the MOFs. The survey spectra show the presence of Gd, C, O, and F. These chemical identities were also verified by the EDX spectrum (Figures S2–S4). The high-resolution spectra of the individual elements were obtained to assess the chemical nature of the framework (Figure 5).
The F 1s high-resolution XPS spectrum of the Gd-TTA-pcu shows that it has binding energy of 687.4 eV (Figure 6). The F 1s BE in the range of 686–690 are typical of the C-F species [17]. Therefore, this peak is assigned to the linker F in the -CF3 groups. No metal-fluorine species were found in the Gd-TTA-pcu. The F 1s in the metal fluorides shows BE in the range of 682–686 eV [21]. Moreover, this is cross-verified from the C 1s binding energy by the presence of the peak at 291.8 eV, which corresponds to fluorine bound carbon (Figure 6) [22]. The C 1s peaks at 284.4 and 287.4 eV are assigned to aromatic C=C and C-O species [23]. These observations are in agreement with the crystal structure. The high-resolution O 1s spectrum exhibits two peaks with binding energies 530.9 and 532.8, which are assigned to the carboxylate groups and DMF oxygen atoms. The Gd 4d spectrum shows a spin-orbital doublet 4d5/2 and 4d3/2 with binding energies of 142.5 and 147.6 eV [24]. These binding energies correspond to the Gd(III) species similar to Gd2O3 [24].
The chemical nature of the Gd-TTA-fcu framework was analyzed using the high-resolution XPS spectra of the elements present in the MOF (Figure 7). The high-resolution scan of the F 1s in the Gd-TTA-fcu shows two distinct peaks, indicating the presence of two different chemical states of the fluorine. The peak with the lower binding energy at 685.1 eV is assigned to the fluorine present in the metal clusters. This binding energy is in the range of metal-fluorides [9]. The F 1s peak at the higher binding energy of 687.8 is assigned to the fluorine in the organic linker present as -CF3 groups, which is also confirmed from the C 1s spectrum by the presence of the C-F peak at 291.8 eV [22]. The 19F-NMR of the Gd-TTA-fcu also confirms the presence of fluorinated metal clusters (Figure S5). The acid-digested MOF in the D2SO4 exhibits the HF peak at −168.72 produced from the decomposition of the fluorinated cluster. The high-resolution O 1s spectrum shows a singlet peak at the binding energy of 532 eV, corresponding to the metal-bound carboxylate groups. The absence of low binding energy peaks around 530–531 eV indicates there are no bridging hydroxy groups. The C 1s spectra show peaks at 284.4 and 288.0, and 291.8 eV, which correspond to C=C, C=O, and C-F bonds in the organic linker. The Gd 4d spectrum shows a spin-orbital doublet 4d5/2 and 4d3/2 with binding energies of 142.8 and 148.0 eV [24].
The hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the MOFs were analyzed by water contact angle measurements (Figure 8). Materials with a water contact angle higher than 90 degrees are considered hydrophobic. It was found that the Eu-TTA-pcu exhibits a water contact angle of 16.7°. The Eu-TTA-fcu, on the other hand, exhibits a slightly lower contact angle of 105.6°. The Gd-TTA-pcu and Gd-TTA-fcu exhibit contact angles of 122.6° and 110.6°. The slight changes in the RE-TTA-fcu MOFs are attributed to the presence of additional fluorine in the metal clusters. Despite the presence of fluorine, the MOFs are not hydrophobic. This is possibly due to the presence of open metal sites in the MOFs, which may have coordinated water molecules. Additionally, the RE-TTA-fcu may have dimethyl ammonium (DMA) ions in the MOFs similar to the Ho-UiO-66 [14]. These DMA cations are generated by the breakdown of the dimethylformamide in solvothermal conditions [25,26,27]. Therefore, the hydrophobicity is decreased in the hexacluster-based MOFs. The hydrophobic nature of the RE-TTA-pcu was further demonstrated by adding crystals in non-polar and polar solvents (Figure 9). Since the crystals were colorless, a UV light (298 nm) was used for the fluorescence contrast against a dark background. The RE-TTA-pcu crystals did not sink in the water. However, in the non-polar solvent, cyclohexane, the crystals immediately sedimented. It is anticipated that the increase in hydrophobicity can be further increased by using more fluorinated linkers. This tunable nature makes these materials attractive for separation applications where gas molecules have small differences in their hydrophobicity.

4. Conclusions

Two new fluorinated hydrophobic rare-earth MOFs were synthesized using the fluorinated linker bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid and RE (RE: Y, Gd, or Eu) ions. In the absence of 2-fluorobenzoic acid, RE-TTA-pcu MOFs were obtained with fluorine present only on the linker. The crystal structure of the RE-TTA-pcu showed that they possessed binuclear rare-earth metal nodes and two-dimensional pore channels. The use of 2-fluorobenzoic acid resulted in MOFs with the fcu topology and fluorinated hexaclusters similar to RE-UiO-66. RE-TTA-fcu MOFs have fluorine on the linker as well as in the metal clusters. The MOFs were characterized via single-crystal XRD, powder XRD, 19F-NMR, EDS, XPS, and TGA analysis. The hydrophobicity of the MOFs was characterized by water contact angle measurements. The incorporation of fluorine in the metal clusters as well as on the linker holds may result in the development of hydrophobic MOFs for various applications, such as selective CO2 capture.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma17174213/s1.

Author Contributions

K.J.B.J. and M.A. conceived and designed the project. M.A. and B.M. performed the experiments and wrote the original draft. S.S., B.M. and M.J. performed the formal analysis and contributed to the writing and revisions. K.J.B.J. performed the funding acquisition, conceptualization, review and editing, supervision, and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Robert A. Welch foundation (Grant No. AT-1153).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article. Additional data are provided in the supporting information file. CCDC 2362361 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the University of Texas at Dallas Office of Research through the Core Facility Voucher Program (10319). The authors acknowledge the UTD Office of the Graduate Education for the dissertation research award.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jayaramulu, K.; Geyer, F.; Schneemann, A.; Kment, Š.; Otyepka, M.; Zboril, R.; Vollmer, D.; Fischer, R.A. Hydrophobic Metal–Organic Frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Venturi, D.M.; Notari, M.S.; Bondi, R.; Mosconi, E.; Kaiser, W.; Mercuri, G.; Giambastiani, G.; Rossin, A.; Taddei, M.; Costantino, F. Increased CO2 Affinity and Adsorption Selectivity in MOF-801 Fluorinated Analogues. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 40801–40811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Morelli Venturi, D.; Costantino, F. Recent Advances in the Chemistry and Applications of Fluorinated Metal–Organic Frameworks (F-MOFs). RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 29215–29230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xie, L.; Xu, M.; Liu, X.; Zhao, M.; Li, J. Hydrophobic Metal–Organic Frameworks: Assessment, Construction, and Diverse Applications. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1901758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nishino, T.; Meguro, M.; Nakamae, K.; Matsushita, M.; Ueda, Y. The Lowest Surface Free Energy Based on−CF3 Alignment. Langmuir 1999, 15, 4321–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gilman, J.J. Direct Measurements of the Surface Energies of Crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 1960, 31, 2208–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saraci, F.; Quezada-Novoa, V.; Donnarumma, P.R.; Howarth, A.J. Rare-Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks: From Structure to Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 7949–7977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arteaga, A.; Lulich, A.; Nyman, M.; Surbella, R.G. Designing Scintillating Coordination Polymers Using a Dual-Ligand Synthetic Approach. CrystEngComm 2023, 25, 4496–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abbas, M.; Sheybani, S.; Mortensen, M.L.; Balkus, K.J. Fluoro-Bridged Rare-Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 3445–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alezi, D.; Peedikakkal, A.M.P.; Weseliński, Ł.; Guillerm, V.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Cairns, A.; Chen, Z.; Wojtas, Ł.; Eddaoudi, M. Quest for Highly Connected Metal–Organic Framework Platforms: Rare-Earth Polynuclear Clusters Versatility Meets Net Topology Needs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5421–5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bicalho, H.A.; Donnarumma, P.R.; Quezada-Novoa, V.; Titi, H.M.; Howarth, A.J. Remodelling a Shp: Transmetalation in a Rare-Earth Cluster-Based Metal-Organic Framework. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 11795–11802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vizuet, J.P.; Lewis, A.L.; McCandless, G.T.; Balkus, K.J. Characterization of a Holmium 4,4′-Biphenyldicarboxylate Metal-Organic Framework and Its Potential as a Holmium Carrier System. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 20, 3019–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Younis, S.A.; Bhardwaj, N.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Kim, K.-H.; Deep, A. Rare Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks (RE-MOFs): Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 429, 213620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vizuet, J.P.; Mortensen, M.L.; Lewis, A.L.; Wunch, M.A.; Firouzi, H.R.; McCandless, G.T.; Balkus, K.J. Fluoro-Bridged Clusters in Rare-Earth Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 17995–18000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sheybani, S.; Abbas, M.; Firouzi, H.R.; Xiao, Z.; Zhou, H.C.; Balkus, K.J. Synthesis of Fluoro-Bridged Ho3+ and Gd3+ 1,3,5-Tris(4-Carboxyphenyl)Benzene Metal-Organic Frameworks from Perfluoroalkyl Substances. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 4314–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mortensen, M.L.; Bisht, S.; Abbas, M.; Firouzi, H.; McCandless, G.T.; Shatruk, M.; Balkus, K.J. Lanthanide Metal–Organic Frameworks Exhibiting Fluoro-Bridged Extended Chains: Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Magnetic Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Abbas, M.; Maceda, A.M.; Firouzi, H.R.; Xiao, Z.; Arman, H.D.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, H.C.; Balkus, K.J. Fluorine Extraction from Organofluorine Molecules to Make Fluorinated Clusters in Yttrium MOFs. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 14285–14291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yaghi, O.M.; Kalmutzki, M.J.; Diercks, C.S. Introduction to Reticular Chemistry: Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent Organic Frameworks; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ajoyan, Z.; Bicalho, H.A.; Rafael Donnarumma, P.; Antanovich, A.; Howarth, A.J. Tuning the Rare-Earth UiO-66 Metal–Organic Framework Platform for White Light Emission. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 8929–8934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richezzi, M.; Donnarumma, P.R.; Copeman, C.; Howarth, A.J. Rare-Earth Acetates as Alternative Precursors for Rare-Earth Cluster-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Commun. 2024, 60, 5173–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kawamoto, Y.; Ogura, K.; Shojiya, M.; Takahashi, M.; Kadono, K. F1s XPS of Fluoride Glasses and Related Fluoride Crystals. J. Fluor. Chem. 1999, 96, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Durand, E.; Labrugère, C.; Tressaud, A.; Renaud, M. Surface Fluorination of Carboxylated Nitrile Butadiene Rubber: An XPS Study. Plasmas Polym. 2002, 7, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abbas, M.; Marti, A.M.; Umer, A.; Joy, M.; Yang, Y.-C.; Wang, S.-L.; Balkus, K.J. Encapsulation of Cobaltocenium Ions in a Zeolite-like Metal–Organic Framework. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 21159–21167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raiser, D.; Deville, J.P. Study of XPS Photoemission of Some Gadolinium Compounds. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1991, 57, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Donnarumma, P.R.; Copeman, C.; Richezzi, M.; Sardilli, J.; Titi, H.M.; Howarth, A.J. Deciphering Trends in Structural Parameters of RE-UiO-66 Metal–Organic Frameworks through Single Crystal Analysis. Cryst. Growth Des. 2024, 24, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Loukopoulos, E.; Angeli, G.K.; Kouvidis, K.; Tsangarakis, C.; Trikalitis, P.N. Accessing 14-Connected Nets: Continuous Breathing, Hydrophobic Rare-Earth Metal Organic Frameworks Based on 14-c Hexanuclear Clusters with High Affinity for Non-Polar Vapors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22242–22251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lutton-Gething, A.R.B.J.; Spencer, B.F.; Whitehead, G.F.S.; Vitorica-Yrezabal, I.J.; Lee, D.; Attfield, M.P. Disorder and Sorption Preferences in a Highly Stable Fluoride-Containing Rare-Earth Fcu-Type Metal–Organic Framework. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 1957–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of the fluorinated (left) organic linker 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA) and (right) RE hexacluster (X = OH or F).
Figure 1. Structure of the fluorinated (left) organic linker 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)terephthalic acid (TTA) and (right) RE hexacluster (X = OH or F).
Materials 17 04213 g001
Figure 2. Crystal structure of the Eu-TTA-pcu: (a) asymmetric unit, (b) extended framework viewed along the c-direction, (c) extended framework viewed along the [111] lattice vector, and (d) the pcu topology of the framework, showing a central cavity with a diameter of 4.5 Å (yellow sphere).
Figure 2. Crystal structure of the Eu-TTA-pcu: (a) asymmetric unit, (b) extended framework viewed along the c-direction, (c) extended framework viewed along the [111] lattice vector, and (d) the pcu topology of the framework, showing a central cavity with a diameter of 4.5 Å (yellow sphere).
Materials 17 04213 g002
Figure 3. Space-filling model of the Eu-TTA-pcu (a) viewed along the a-axis and (b) viewed along the [111] vector. The channels and pore apertures (c) viewed along the a-axis, where channels are perpendicular to the plane, and (d) viewed along the c-axis, where channels are parallel to the plane. The inner surface of the channels is represented by the blue color.
Figure 3. Space-filling model of the Eu-TTA-pcu (a) viewed along the a-axis and (b) viewed along the [111] vector. The channels and pore apertures (c) viewed along the a-axis, where channels are perpendicular to the plane, and (d) viewed along the c-axis, where channels are parallel to the plane. The inner surface of the channels is represented by the blue color.
Materials 17 04213 g003
Figure 4. Powder XRD patterns of the (a) RE-TTA-pcu compared to the Eu-TTA-pcu simulated XRD pattern and (b) RE-TTA-fcu MOFs compared to the Ho-UiO-66 (CCDC 2080338).
Figure 4. Powder XRD patterns of the (a) RE-TTA-pcu compared to the Eu-TTA-pcu simulated XRD pattern and (b) RE-TTA-fcu MOFs compared to the Ho-UiO-66 (CCDC 2080338).
Materials 17 04213 g004
Figure 5. The XPS survey spectra of (a) Gd-TTA-pcu, and (b) Gd-TTA-fcu.
Figure 5. The XPS survey spectra of (a) Gd-TTA-pcu, and (b) Gd-TTA-fcu.
Materials 17 04213 g005
Figure 6. The high-resolution XPS spectra of the Gd-TTA-pcu: (a) F 1s (b) O 1s, (c) Gd 4d, and (d) C 1s.
Figure 6. The high-resolution XPS spectra of the Gd-TTA-pcu: (a) F 1s (b) O 1s, (c) Gd 4d, and (d) C 1s.
Materials 17 04213 g006
Figure 7. The high-resolution XPS spectra of the Gd-TTA-fcu: (a) F 1s (b) O 1s, (c) C 1s, and (d) Gd 4d.
Figure 7. The high-resolution XPS spectra of the Gd-TTA-fcu: (a) F 1s (b) O 1s, (c) C 1s, and (d) Gd 4d.
Materials 17 04213 g007
Figure 8. Contact angle measurement images of water on the surface of the RE-MOFs: (a) Eu-TTA-pcu, (b) Eu-TTA-fcu, (c) Gd-TTA-pcu and (d) Gd-TTA-fcu.
Figure 8. Contact angle measurement images of water on the surface of the RE-MOFs: (a) Eu-TTA-pcu, (b) Eu-TTA-fcu, (c) Gd-TTA-pcu and (d) Gd-TTA-fcu.
Materials 17 04213 g008
Figure 9. The Eu-TTA-pcu crystals (a) floating on water and (b) sinking in cyclohexane. The UV light (298 nm) was used for contrast.
Figure 9. The Eu-TTA-pcu crystals (a) floating on water and (b) sinking in cyclohexane. The UV light (298 nm) was used for contrast.
Materials 17 04213 g009
Table 1. Crystallographic data of the Eu-TTA-pcu.
Table 1. Crystallographic data of the Eu-TTA-pcu.
NameEu-TTA-pcu
Formula{[Eu(TTA)1.5(DMF)]·(H2O)·(DMF)}n
Temperature/K200
Space group P 1 ¯
Crystal systemTriclinic
a10.0620(11)
b11.2464(12)
c/Å12.3211(14)
α (°)103.880(4)
β (°)106.931(4)
γ (°)92.980(4)
Volume (Å3)1283.7(2)
Crystall Size (mm3)0.100 × 0.080 × 0.070
2θ range for data collection/°2.654 to 25.111°
Completeness to theta99.7%
Reflection collected25,679
Independent reflections4563 [R(int) = 0.0433]
Goodness-of-fit on F21.197
Final R indexes[I ≥ 2σ(I)]R1 = 0.0350, wR2 = 0.0858
Final R indexes [All Data]R1 = 0.0422, wR2 = 0.0954
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbas, M.; Murari, B.; Sheybani, S.; Joy, M.; Balkus, K.J., Jr. Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Fluorinated Hydrophobic Rare–Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Materials 2024, 17, 4213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174213

AMA Style

Abbas M, Murari B, Sheybani S, Joy M, Balkus KJ Jr. Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Fluorinated Hydrophobic Rare–Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Materials. 2024; 17(17):4213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbas, Muhammad, Bhargavasairam Murari, Simin Sheybani, Monu Joy, and Kenneth J. Balkus, Jr. 2024. "Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Fluorinated Hydrophobic Rare–Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs)" Materials 17, no. 17: 4213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop