Next Article in Journal
Reference-Based Restriction-Site-Associated DNA Sequencing Data Are Useful for Species Delineation in a Recently Diverged Asexually Reproducing Species Complex (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Distinct Ecosystems of the North Caucasus, a Temperate Biodiversity Hotspot
Previous Article in Journal
Fungal Infections in the Caribbean: A Review of the Literature to Date
Previous Article in Special Issue
Compensatory Base Changes in ITS2 Secondary Structure Alignment, Modelling, and Molecular Phylogeny: An Integrated Approach to Improve Species Delimitation in Tulasnella (Basidiomycota)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny Reveal Five New Species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China

1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
2
Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture Forestry and Grassland Science Research Institute, Chuxiong 675000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 28 November 2023 / Accepted: 29 November 2023 / Published: 8 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Diversity and Systematics in the Digital Era)

Abstract

:
The genus Laccaria is a type of cosmopolitan and ecologically important fungal group. Members can form ectomycorrhizal associations with numerous trees, and some species are common edible fungi in local markets. Although some new species from China are recently published, the species diversity of Laccaria is still unclear in China. In this study, some samples of Laccaria were collected from southern China, and morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses based on the multilocus dataset of ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 confirmed five new species. Laccaria miniata, L. nanlingensis and L. neovinaceoavellanea were collected from subtropical broad-leaved forests, and L. rufobrunnea and L. umbilicata were collected from subtropical mixed forests of southwest China. Full descriptions, illustrations, comparisons with similar species and phylogenetic analysis are provided.

1. Introduction

Laccaria Berk. & Broome (Agaricales, Hydnangiaceae) is an important fungal group with high ecological and economic values. Species in Laccaria are widely reported from every continent except Antarctica and can form ectomycorrhizal (ECM) relationships with a wide range of trees, such as Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Myrtaceae, Pinaceae and Salicaceae [1,2]. Laccaria is considered a model genus for understanding ectomycorrhizal (ECM) ecology and evolution; some species are reported that can act as pioneer species and can be frequently found in recently disturbed sites and young forest stands, play important roles in primary and secondary succession, and are useful for ecological protection and restoration [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In addition, some Laccaria species are edible and common in local markets [12]; for example, L. aurantia, L. bicolor, L. moshuijun and L. vinaceoavellanea are commercial mushrooms in Sichuan Province, China [13].
In general, Laccaria members are mainly characterized by the collybioid to omphaloid basidiocarp; the convex to plane or umbilicate, and usually dry pileus; thick, waxy, sinuate to subdecurrent, often widely spaced lamellae, echinulate basidiospores, the hymenium typically devoid of pleurocystidia, and the clamped hyphae [8,14,15,16,17,18]. It is not difficult to recognize the genus Laccaria due to its distinct morphological characteristics; however, infrageneric species identification is difficult in many instances due to the overlapping morphological features [18,19,20]. Recent studies show that molecular data are helpful in species identification of this genus [1,2,17,18,20,21,22]. The discovery of Laccaria new species has been rapidly increasing in recent years [23]. To date, about 110 species have been reported worldwide [2,23], but most of them were originally described from Europe and North America [1,8,20,24,25,26,27,28,29]. In China, 25 Laccaria species have been reported, including 17 species originally described from China [1,2,17,22,30,31,32,33,34].
During the survey of macrofungi in southern and southwestern China, some distinct Laccaria samples were collected. Based on morphological feature studies and multilocus phylogenetic analyses, five species are confirmed as new to science. Therefore, they are formally introduced herein, containing the full morphological descriptions, color photographs, line drawings, comparison with similar species, and a phylogenetic tree to show their placement and uniqueness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies

Photographs of fresh basidiocarps were taken in the field. Specimens were dried and deposited in the Fungarium of Guangdong Institute of Microbiology (GDGM). Descriptions of macro-morphological characters and habitats were obtained from photographs and field notes. Color codes follow Kornerup and Wanscher [35]. Microscopic observations were carried out on tissue sections stained with 5% KOH and 1% aqueous Congo red under a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan) with magnification up to 1000×. For basidiospore descriptions, the abbreviation [n/m/p] denotes n spores measured from m basidiomata of p collections; the notation (a–)b–c(–d) describes basidiospore dimensions, where the range b–c represented 90% or more of the measured values and ‘a’ and ‘d’ were the extreme values; ‘av.’ represents the mean range of basidiospore length × width. Q referred to the length/width ratio of an individual basidiospore, and Qm referred to the average Q value of all basidiospores ± sample standard deviation. All microstructure line drawings were made based on rehydrated materials.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was applied to observe the surface of basidiospores. Lamellar fragments of the dried specimens were fastened to aluminum stubs and coated with gold palladium. Then, they were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (Thermo Scientific Apreo 2S HiVac, Brno, Czech Republic) with an accelerating rate of 5 kV.

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA samples were extracted from voucher specimens using the Sangon Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs ITS1F/ITS4 [36], LR0R/LR7 [37], EF1-983F/EF1-1967R [38] and bRPB2-6F/bRPB2-7.1R [39] were used to amplify ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2, respectively. PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 0.5 μL template DNA, 11 μL sterile deionized water, 0.5 μL of each primer and 12.5 μL 2× PCR mix (DreamTaqtm Green PCR Master Mix, Fermentas, MA, USA). Amplification reactions were performed in a TProfessional Standard Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 4 min; then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 60 s, annealing at 53 °C (ITS, LSU)/50 °C (tef1)/52 °C (rpb2) for 60 s, extension at 72 °C for 60 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels and then sent for sequencing on an ABI Prism® 3730 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) at the Beijing Genomic Institute (BGI) using the same PCR primers. The raw sequences were assembled and checked with SeqMan implemented in Lasergene v7.1 (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The newly generated sequences in this study were submitted to GenBank.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequences generated in this study and those downloaded from GenBank were combined and used for phylogenetic reconstruction. Detailed information of specimens included in this study was given in Table 1. Sequence matrices of ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2 were aligned separately with software MAFFT v7 using the E-INS-i strategy [40] and manually adjusted in MEGA 6 [41]. The ambiguously aligned regions and introns of the two protein-coding genes of tef1 and rpb2 were retained in the final analyses. Phylogenetic analyses were performed in PhyloSuite [42]. Maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE [43] under the Edge-linked partition model (TPM2u+F+R4 for ITS and rpb2, TN+F+R3 for LSU, and TIM2e+G4 for tef1) for 5000 ultrafast bootstraps [44], as well as the Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood-ratio test [45]. Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 [46], and the best models of the multilocus datasets were searched via PartitionFinder 2 [47] for each locus, i.e., GTR+F+I+G4 for ITS and tef1, K80 + I + G for LSU, and SYM + I + G4 for rpb2. BI analysis using four chains was conducted by setting generations to 200,000 and the stoprul command with the value of stopval set to 0.01; trees were sampled every 1000 generations, the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in and posterior probabilities (PP) were then calculated from the posterior distribution of the retained Bayesian trees. The phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.23.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogeny

The combined dataset (ITS+LSU+tef1+rpb2) used for phylogenetic analyses consisted of 378 sequences from 185 collections, including 30 sequences (10 for ITS, 10 for nrLSU, 5 for tef1 and 5 for rpb2) newly generated in the present study. The final alignment contained 2802 characters (704, 889, 614 and 595 for ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2, respectively). Mythicomyces corneipes (Fr.) Redhead & A.H. Sm. was selected as the outgroup based on recent studies [2,33]. The phylogeny tree derived from the ML analysis with both PP and BS support values is shown in Figure 1. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Laccaria is a well-supported monophyletic group; specimens collected from China in the current study formed five highly supported monophyletic lineages within the genus. Three new species, L. neovinaceoavellanea, L. rufobrunnea and L. umbilicata, clustered together with L. diospyricola, L. fengkaiensis, L. prave, L. vinaceoavellanea, L. violaceotincta and L. yunnanensis, and formed a well-supported subclade. Laccaria miniata showed a close relationship with L. glabripes, L. paraphysata and L. ohiensis. Two specimens named L. nanlingensis formed a monophyletic clade.

3.2. Taxonomy

Laccaria miniata Ming Zhang, sp. nov.; Figure 2a,b, Figure 3a,b and Figure 4.
Fungal Name: FN571672
Diagnosis—Laccaria miniata is distinguished by its small red basidiocarps with relatively longer stipes, longer basidia usually with two sterigmata (up to 11 μm long), globose to subglobose basidiospores, and the absence of cheilocystidia and caulocystidia.
Etymology—‘miniata’ refers to the red basidiocarp.
Type—CHINA. Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, Huadu District, Hongxiuquan Reservoir, elevation of 150 m, in a broad-leaved forest mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees, 23°27′ N, 113°12′ E, elevation of 100 m, 14 March 2019, Ming Zhang (GDGM76043), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689440, 28S = OR785476.
Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 10–15 mm broad, convex to applanate, hygrophanous, glabrous to subtomentose, red (9A7–11A7), with a deep red (10C8–11C8) center, gradually fading to reddish orange to yellowish red (7A7–8A7) toward margin; margin entire, translucent-striate; context pale red (9A3–11A3). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, pastel red (8A4–10A4), pastel pink (11A4) to red (9A6); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 35–60 mm long, 1.5–2 mm thick, subcylindrical, subglabrous to fibrillose, sometimes slightly longitudinally striate, red (9A7–11A7) to deep red (10C8–11C8); basal mycelium white to grayish white (1A1–1A2). Odor and taste unknown.
Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] 8–10.5(11) × 8–10 μm, av. 9.37 ± 0.83 × 8.80 ± 0.60, Q = 1–1.11, Qm = 1.06 ± 0.04, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, crowded; spines 0.5–1 μm long. Basidia 40–58 × 8–15 μm, clavate, hyaline, mostly two-spored, occasionally four-spored; sterigmata 6–11 μm long. Pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia not observed. Pileipellis, a cutis, composed of appressed, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 5–15 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 5–12 μm wide. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, colorless hyphae 3–15 μm wide. Caulocystidia lacking. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae (Castanopsis fissa, C. spp.) trees. Currently known to be from southern China.
Notes—Laccaria miniata is mainly characterized by its tiny pileus, relatively slender stipe (stipe length 3–5 times that of pileus diameter), and the absence of pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia. On the base of the morphological features given above, the new species can be placed either in sect. Laccata or in sect. Bisporae of Laccaria [29].
Laccaria pumila Fayod, originally reported from France, is similar to L. miniata for having small basidiocarps; however, the former differs by its red-brown to orange-brown pileus usually fading to buff, pinkish flesh lamellae, interwoven pileipellis hyphae, larger basidiospores measuring (10)11–16.5(20) × (7.8)10–14.5(16) µm, and the north temperate habitations [55]. Laccaria laccata (Scop.) Cooke differs by the relatively larger basidiocarps, broadly elliptical basidiospores (8.5–9.5 × 6.7–8 μm), and the north temperate habitations [63,64]. Laccaria longipes G.M. Muell., originally reported from North America, also has long stipes; however, L. longipes differs by its larger basidiocarp, orange-brown to buff pileus, and subglobose to broadly elliptical basidiospores (av. 7.6–7.8 × 6.8–7.2 μm in size) [63].
Phylogenetic analysis shows L. miniata is close to L. glabripes McNabb, L. ohiensis (Mont.) Singer and L. paraphysata (McNabb) J.A. Cooper. Laccaria glabripes, originally reported from New Zealand, differs from L. miniata by its flesh pink to reddish brown pileus with a darker center, more robust stipe, and shorter four-spored basidia (32–48 × 7–10.5 μm) [65]; Laccaria ohiensis, originally reported from North America, differs by its relatively larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 35–50 mm in diameter), reddish brown to dark reddish brown pileus with finely furfuraceous tomentum on surface, larger basidiospores (9.5–12.5 µm in diameter) and two-spored basidia [59,65]; L. paraphysata differs by its relatively larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 35 mm broad), reddish brown to dark reddish brown pileus, irregularly shaped and simple branched paraphyses, and the presenting of cheilocystidia [65]. In addition, L. paraphysata is currently only known to be from New Zealand and grows under native bush and scrub dominated by Leptospermum spp. [65].
Laccaria nanlingensis Ming Zhang, sp. nov.; Figure 2c,d, Figure 3c and Figure 5.
Fungal Name: FN571673
Etymology—‘nanlingensis’ refers to the locality of the type species in Nanling National Nature Reserve.
Diagnosis—Laccaria nanlingensis is characterized by its relatively larger basidiocarp, orange to brownish red pileus, pale red to grayish red lamellae, and small basidiospores (6.5–7.5 × 6–7 μm).
Type—CHINA. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Nanling National Nature Reserve, 24°56′ N, 113°3′ E, elevation of 1000 m, 27 March 2021, Ming Zhang (GDGM84954), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689442, 28S = OR785478, tef1 = OR826273, rpb2 = OR835199.
Basidiocarps small to medium, omphalinoid. Pileus 30–55 mm broad, convex to applanate, with a shallowly depressed center, dry or hygrophanous, glabrous, orange, reddish orange, orange-red, brownish orange to brownish red (5A6–8A6, 6C6–8C6), slightly fading to light orange to pale orange when dry, with obviously radial translucent striate, especially toward margin; margin entire, involute when young, applanate to wavy when old; context pinkish white to purplish white (13A2–14A2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, concolorous with pileus or darker to pale red to grayish red (9A4–10A4, 9C4–10C4); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 25–70 mm long, 2–5 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, concolorous with pileus; basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.
Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] 6.5–7.5 × 6–7 μm, av. 6.95 ± 0.15 × 6.37 ± 0.45, Q = 1–1.16, Qm = 1.09 ± 0.07, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, not crowded, distant; spines 0.5–1 μm long. Basidia 35–48 × 8–12 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 6–10 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 40–60 × 4–6 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Pileipellis a cutis with repent hyphae, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 5–13 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 5–10 μm wide. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 4–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia 50–67 × 7–9 μm, clavate, scarce, sometimes subcapitate to irregularly shaped, slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown, scattered. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees. Currently known to be from southern China.
Additional specimens examined—China. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Ruyuan County, Nanling National Nature Reserve, 24°56′ N, 113°3′ E, elevation of 1000 m, 27 March 2017, Ming Zhang (GDGM84949), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689441, 28S = OR785477, tef1 = OR826274, rpb2 = OR835198.
Notes—Laccaria fagacicola Yang-Yang Cui, Qing Cai & Zhu L. Yang, L. himalayensis A.W. Wilson & G.M. Muell. and L. yunnanensis Popa, Rexer, Donges, Zhu L. Yang & G. Kost are similar to L. nanlingensis. However, L. fagacicola differs from L. nanlingensis by its brownish orange to brownish pileus, relatively larger basidiospores (7–9 × 6.5–8 μm) and basidia (45–60 × 9–12 μm) [2]. Laccaria himalayensis differs by its larger basidiospores (av. 8.1–9.0 μm) and growing in mixed-temperate alpine conifer forests with Abies, Acer, Larix, Pinus and Salix [1]. Laccaria yunnanensis differs in having larger basidiocarps, brownish to flesh-colored pileus, flesh-colored lamellae, relatively larger basidiospores (8–9 × 8–10 μm), and the presence of pleurocystidia (55–65 ×15–25 μm) [22]. In addition, L. torosa H.J. Cho & Y.W. Lim also resembles L. nanlingensis; however, L. torosa, reported from Korea, differs in having larger basidiocarps, orange-brown to brown pileus fading to pale orange buff when dry or old, and larger basidiospores (8–9×8–9.5 μm) [50].
Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) showed that two specimens labeled as L. nanlingensis clustered together as an independent clade in the genus Laccaria, although its relationship to other Laccaria species is unclear.
Based on the morphological features, such as the dry or hygrophanous and reddish orange to brownish red pileus, the brownish red to grayish red lamellae, globose basidiospores with Q = 1–1.16, and the four-spored basidia, L. nanlingensis can be placed in the Laccaria sect. Laccata [29].
Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea Ming Zhang & X.L. Gao, sp. nov.; Figure 2i, Figure 3d,e and Figure 6.
Fungal Name: FN571685
Diagnosis—Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea is distinctive by its pastel pink to pale violet pileus with a depressed center, globose to subglobose basidiospores with spines up to 2 μm long, and the presence of clavate, subcapitate to irregularly shaped caulocystidia.
Etymology—‘neovinaceoavellanea’ refers to the species similar to L. vinaceoavellanea.
Type—CHINA. Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou City, Congyi County, Yangling National Forest Park, 25°37′ N, 114°19′ E, elevation of 400 m, 31 August 2016, Ming Zhang (GDGM52852), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689447, 28S = OR785479.
Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 15–40 mm broad, convex to applanate, with a depressed center, dry or hygrophanous, subglabrous to subtomentosus, pastel pink, rose, purplish pink to pale violet (11A3–16A3) at mass, grayish magenta to dull violet (13D3–15D3) at center, with obviously radial translucent-striate, especially toward margin; margin entire, involute when young, applanate to wavy when old; context white to pinkish white or purplish white (13A2–14A2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, concolorous with pileus or paler; lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 30–70 mm long, 2–5 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous to fibrillose, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, pastel red, rose to purplish pink (8A4–14A4); basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.
Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [30/2/2] 7–8 × 7–8 μm, av. = 7.6 ± 0.4 × 7.35 ± 0.42, Q = 1–1.14, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.04, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, crowded; spines 1–2 μm long, 0.8–1.5 μm wide at base. Basidia 30–50 × 10–14 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 4–6 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 25–50 × 4–8 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Pileipellis a cutis with repent and occasionally suberect, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 6–18 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 5–10 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, infrequently branching, simple septate, thin-walled, colorless hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia 30–50 × 5–10 μm, clavate, sometimes subcapitate to irregularly shaped, slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown, scattered. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae. Currently known to be from southwestern and southern China.
Additional specimens examined—China. Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou City, Congyi County, Yangling National Forest Park, 25°37′ N, 114°19′ E, elevation of 400 m, 2 September 2016, Ming Zhang (GDGM53063), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689448, 28S = OR785480; Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Lufeng County, Guangtong Town, elevation of 2200 m, 29 August 2022, Xue-lian Gao 16 (GDGM89621), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689449, 28S = OR785481.
Notes—Laccaria amethystina Cooke and L. vinaceoavellanea Hongo are morphologically similar to L. neovinaceoavellanea. Laccaria amethystina is different by an initially purple pileus gradually fading to buff or brownish, dark purple lamellae, finely to coarsely hairy or scaly stipe concolorous with pileus, and relatively larger basidiospores (7–10 μm in diameter) ornamented with longer spines (1.5–3 μm long) [8,28,66,67]. Laccaria vinaceoavellanea differs by a larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 60 mm broad), grayish buff, brownish vinaceous to vinaceous-buff pileus with furfuraceous at the margin, and relatively larger basidiospores (7.4–9.2 × 7.4–9.2 µm) [8,68].
Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) showed that L. neovinaceoavellanea is closely related to L. vinaceoavellanea, L. violaceotincta K.P.D. Latha, K.N.A. Raj & Manim. and L. yunnanensis. However, L. violaceotincta, originally reported from India, differs by its strongly hygrophanous and glabrous pileus, reddish gray or violet grays stipe covered with fine fibrils, and the presence of both two- and four-spored basidia [59]. Laccaria yunnanensis differs by its brownish to flesh-colored basidiocarp, flesh-colored lamellae, and larger basidiospores measuring (7.5)8–9 × (7.5)8–10 μm [22].
Based on the morphological features, such as the purplish pink to pale violet basidiocarps, globose basidiospores with Q = 1–1.14, four-spored basidia, and the colorless to slightly brownish pileipellis hyphae, L. neovinaceoavellanea can be placed in the Laccaria sect. Violaceae [29].
Laccaria rufobrunnea Ming Zhang & X.L. Gao, sp. nov.; Figure 2e,f, Figure 3f and Figure 7.
Fungal Name: FN571674
Diagnosis—Laccaria rufobrunnea is distinctive in the genus Laccaria by its brownish orange to brownish red pileus, pastel red to purplish pink lamellae, white to pinkish white stipe, and the absence of caulocystidia.
Etymology—‘rufobrunnea’ refers to the brownish-red pileus color.
Type: China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Nanhua County, 25°15′N, 101°16′ E, elevation of 1900 m, 26 August 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82878), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689443, 28S = OR785482, tef1 = OR826272, rpb2 = OR835197.
Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 12–35 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, hygrophanous, glabrous, brownish orange to brownish red (6C7–9C7), with a darker center, usually fading to brownish yellow (5C7) in dry condition; margin entire, involute to incurved when young, incurved to decurved when old, obscurely translucent-striate; context brownish gray (5C2–8C2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, pastel red, pink to purplish pink (10A4–14A4), usually changing pinkish white to purplish white in dry condition or old (10A2–14A2); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 20–40 mm long, 3–5 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, white to pinkish white (7A2–10A2); basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.
Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] 8–9 × 7–8 μm, av. 8.15 ± 0.23 × 7.57 ± 0.5, Q = 1–1.14, Qm = 1.08 ± 0.06, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, not crowded, subdistant; spines 1–2 μm long. Basidia 40–54 × 10–15 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 5–7 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 35–50 × 3–7 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Pileipellis a cutis with repent hyphae, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 5–12 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of filamentous hyphae 3–6 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 3–9 μm wide. Stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, infrequently branching, simple septate, thin-walled, colorless hyphae 3–9 μm wide. Caulocystidia lacking. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees (such as Quercus yunnanensis, Q. variabilis, Castanopsis hystrix, Castanopsis spp.) and pine trees (such as Pinus khasys, Pinus yunnanensis). Currently known to be from southwestern China.
Additional specimen examined—China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Lufeng County, Guangtong Town, elevation of 2200 m, 29 August 2022, Xue-lian Gao 26 (GDGM89627), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689444, 28S = OR785483.
Notes—Laccaria rufobrunnea is characterized by its brownish orange to brownish red pileus, pastel red to purplish pink lamellae, white to pinkish white stipe, and the absence of caulocystidia. On the basis of the morphological features described above, L. rufobrunnea can be placed in Laccaria sect. Violaceae [29].
Phylogenetic analysis supported L. rufobrunnea as a distinct lineage in Laccaria, and close to L. prava Fang Li and L. umbilicata Ming Zhang. However, L. prava differs by its larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 7.5 cm broad), reddish white to pastel red pileus with strongly striate or rugulose-sulcate, reddish white to grayish red lamellae, longer stipe and smaller basidiospores measuring 6.5–7.5 × 7–8 μm [33]; L. umbilicata differs by its pale orange to light orange pileus, orange white to pinkish white lamellae without purple tinge, broader basidiospores (8–10 μm in diameter) and the present of caulocystidia (present study).
Laccaria umbilicata Ming Zhang, sp. nov.; Figure 2g,h, Figure 3g,h and Figure 8.
Fungal Name: FN 571682
Diagnosis—Laccaria umbilicata is characterized by a pale orange to light orange colored pileus, white to orange-white stipe, globose to subglobose basidiospores (7)8–10 × (7)8–10 μm, and the absence of pleurocystidia.
Etymology—‘umbilicata’ refers to the umbilicate pileus.
Type—China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Nanhua County, 25°15′ N, 101°16′ E, elevation of 1990 m, 26 August 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82911), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689446, 28S = OR785486, tef1 = OR826268, rpb2 = OR835192.
Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 10–28 mm broad, convex to applanate, a depressed center, dry or hygrophanous, glabrous, pale yellow, pale orange to light orange (4A3–6A3, 4A5–6A5), slightly changing light brown to brown (5D7–6D7) when in dry condition, especially toward margin; margin entire, involute when young, applanate when old, with obscurely translucent-striate; context white to orange white (5A1–5A2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, orange-white, to pinkish white (5A2–7A2), sometimes pale orange to pastel red in dry conditions (5A3–7A3); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 20–40 mm long, 2–3 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, white, yellowish white to orange-white (4A2–5A2); basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.
Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] (7)8–10 × (7)8–10 μm, av. 9.03 ± 0.75 × 8.67 ± 0.82, Q = 1–1.125, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.06, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, not crowded, subdistant; spines 1.5–3 μm long, up to 2 μm wide at base. Basidia 40–45 × 10–14 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 6–10 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 30–47 × 3–8 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama subregular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 3–6 μm wide. Pileipellis a cutis with repent and occasionally suberect, thin to slightly thick-walled (ca. 0.5–1 μm) filamentous hyphae 3–18 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Subhymenium composed of filamentous hyphae 3–10 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, infrequently branching, simple septate, thin-walled colorless hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia 28–38 × 4–6 μm, clavate, sometimes subcapitate, slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown, scattered. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Pinus yunnanensis Franchet, mixed with a small number of Fagaceae trees. Currently, it is only known to be from southwestern China.
Additional specimens examined—China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Nanhua County, 25°15′ N, 101°16′ E, elevation of 2000 m, 26 August 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82883), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689445, 28S = OR785485, tef1 = OR826270, rpb2 = OR835194; same locality and data (GDGM82851), GenBank accession nos.: 28S = OR785484, tef1 = OR826271, rpb2 = OR835195.
Notes—Laccaria umbilicata can be easily distinguished from other Laccaria species by its pale orange to light orange pileus with a depressed center, orange-white to pinkish white lamellae, white to orange-white stipe, and the absence of pleurocystidia. Based on the morphological features described above, the new species can be placed in the Laccaria sect. Laccata [29].
Laccaria alba Zhu L. Yang & Lan Wang is morphologically similar to L. umbilicata; however, L. alba differs by its white to whitish basidiocarp, pinkish lamellae and smaller caulocystidia measuring 10–15 × 4–6 µm [30].
Phylogenetically, three specimens named L. umbilicata formed a distinct lineage in Laccaria, and sister to L. prava; however, L. prava can be easily distinguished by its larger basidiocarps (pileus up to 7.5 cm broad) and smaller basidiospores (6.5–7.5 × 7–8 μm) [33]. The two species together with L. diospyricola, L. fengkaiensis, L. neovinaceoavellanea, L. rufobrunnea, L. violaceotincta, L. vinaceoavellanea and L. yunnanensis formed a well-supported Asian distribution subclade (BS/BPP=100%/1), among which, L. diospyricola and L. violaceotincta originally reported from southwestern India, L. vinaceoavellanea reported from Japan, and the others from China.

4. Discussion

Laccaria is a monophyletic group in the family Hydnangiaceae [2,23,69]. Five species-level lineages representing five new species from China were uncovered in the Laccaria clade.
Previous studies based on morphological characteristics divided Laccaria into several different infrageneric classifications [14,29,70,71]. For example, Bon [70] and Ballero and Contu [71] divided the genus Laccaria into three sections (sect. Maritimae, sect. Amethystinae and sect. Laccata), and the section Laccata was further divided into several subgroups. Singer [14] recognized five stirps (stirp Trullissata, stirp Amethystina, stirp Laccata, stirp Galerinoides, and stirp Purpureobadia) in Laccaria. However, Pázmány [48] established two subgenera (subg. Maritimae and subg. Laccata ‘as Laccaria’) in the genus Laccaria, and the subg. Laccata was further divided into five sections (sect. Bisporae, sect. Laccata, sect. Obscurae, sect. Purpureobadia and sect. Violaceae). However, those systematic arrangements were often unstable, unnatural and contradictory, and were not supported by phylogenetic studies based on DNA sequences. Thus, the infrasubgeneric classification of Laccaria is still unclear, and more studies are needed to improve it.
Because the species in Laccaria are very similar in morphology, and the characters of some species change greatly in different growth stages and humidity conditions, there can be difficulties in terms of species identification. The basidiospore dimensions play a crucial role in species identification in most macrofungi groups, but in Laccaria, this characteristic may be confusing because some species share similar size and shape basidiospores. For example, the five new species described above all share with globose to subglobose basidiospores with a Q-value between 1 to 1.1 and the size of basidiospores between 7–10 μm in diameter, except L. nanlingensis. However, the length and density of spines on the spore surface can be a useful distinguishing feature; for example, L. acanthospora, L. alba and L. angustilamella have longer spines that can reach up to 5–6 μm long, while L. miniata and L. prava have shorter spines that are less than 1 μm long (see Table 2); L. miniata, L. neovinaceoavellanea and L. umbilicata have relatively more crowded spines than L. nanlingensis, and L. rufobrunnea (see Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). In the description of the above five species, the words ‘crowded’, ‘subdistant’, and ‘distant’ were used to distinguish the different densities of spines on basidiospores surfaces.
In addition, basidia size and whether they are two- or four-spored can be useful distinguishing features. Most species of Laccaria have four-spored basidia, while L. echinospora, L. fraterna and L. nigra have two-spored basidia, L. aurantia, and the new species L. miniata have both two- and four-spored basidia, which are infrequent in Laccaria.
Additionally, ecological information such as host plant species and habitat are also important and can provide useful clues for species identification. Laccaria miniata and L. nanlingensis collected from subtropical broad-leaved forests of southern China and could be associated with trees of Fagaceae; L. rufobrunnea and L. umbilicata distributed in subtropical mixed forests (which mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees and pine trees) of southwest China; and L. neovinaceoavellanea can naturally distributed in subtropical broad-leaved forests of southern and southwestern China, and can form symbiotic relationship with Fagaceae trees. On the basis of our study, the main morphological characters and ecological information of each species in Laccaria described from China are summarized in Table 2.
Although many species of Laccaria have been reported in China, most species are mainly reported from southwestern regions, and the species recognition of Laccaria in China is still in its infancy, especially in tropical and subtropical areas. In the past, many Chinese samples of Laccaria were inaccurately labeled as L. laccata, L. bicolor, L. amethystea and L. vinaceoavellanea [72,73,74,75]. Phylogenetic studies have made some species well-understood in China, and the discovery of new species in Laccaria is rapidly increasing [2,17,21,22,31,32,33,34,50]. However, the distribution of L. amethystea, L. bicolor and L. laccata in China still needs to be investigated. A broader taxon sampling coupled with both molecular and morphological data is needed to fully understand the species diversity of Laccaria in China.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z.; methodology, M.Z.; performing the experiment, M.Z.; formal analysis, M.Z.; validation, M.Z., X.-L.G., L.-Q.M. and W.-Q.D.; resources, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., X.-L.G. and L.-Q.M.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, M.Z.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Z. and W.-Q.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 32070020, 31970024), the Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Grant No.2022FY100500), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Forestry Bureau (LC-2021124), and the Chuxiong State Financial Market Supervision and Management special fund project (Chu Caixing [2020] 91-2130106).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, and https://nmdc.cn/fungalnames/. (accessed on 1 November 2023).

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Li-Qiang Wu and Xi-Shen Liang for their help during field collections. Thanks are given to Xue-Jiao You for her help with the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of basidiospores.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wilson, A.W.; Hosaka, K.; Mueller, G. Evolution of ectomycorrhizas as a driver of diversification and biogeographic patterns in the model mycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1862–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cui, Y.Y.; Cai, Q.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.L. Two new Laccaria species from China based on molecular and morphological evidence. Mycol. Pro. 2021, 20, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singer, R.; Moser, M. Forest Mycology and forest communities in South America. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 1965, 26, 129–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Watling, R. Relationships between the Development of Higher Plants and Fungal Communities; University of South Florida: Tampa, FL, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  5. Danielson, R.M. Ectomycorrhizal associations in jack pine stands in northeastern Alberta. Can. J. Bot. 1984, 62, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dighton, J.; Mason, P.A. Mycorrhizal dynamics during forest tree development. In Developmental Biology of Higher Fungi; Moore, D., Casselton, L.A., Wood, D.A., Frankland, J.C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1985; pp. 117–139. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dighton, J.; Poskitt, J.M.; Howard, D.M. Changes in occurrence of basidiomycete fruit bodies during forest stand development with specific reference to mycorrhizal species. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1986, 87, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mueller, G.M. Systematics of Laccaria (Agaricales) in the continental United States and Canada, with discussions on extralimital taxa and descriptions of extant types. Fieldiana Bot. 1992, 30, 1–158. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kropp, B.R.; Mueller, G.M. Laccaria. In Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Key Genera in Profile; Cairney, J.W.G., Chambers, S.M., Eds.; Springer Press: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kjøller, R. Disproportionate abundance between ectomycorrhizal root tips and their associated mycelia. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 58, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martin, F.; Aerts, A.; Ahrén, D.; Brun, A.; Danchin, E.G.J.; Duchaussoy, F.; Gibon, J.; Kohler, A.; Lindquist, E.; Pereda, V.; et al. The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 2008, 452, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, F.; Zhou, L.W.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Li, T.H.; Dai, Y.C. Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: Edible, medicinal and poisonous species. Fungal Divers. 2019, 98, 1–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, X.L.; Peng, W.H.; Wang, D. An Illustration of Important Wild Edible Fungi in Sichuan; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2021; pp. 1–206. [Google Scholar]
  14. Singer, R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vellinga, E.C. Some species of Laccaria from India. Sydowia 1986, 39, 224–229. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vellinga, E.C. Tribus Laccarieae (Jülich) Bas. In Flora Agaricina Neerlandica 3; Bas, C., Kuyper, T.W., Noordeloos, M.E., Vellinga, E.C., Eds.; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo, X.; Ye, L.; Chen, J.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Xu, J.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Mortimer, P.E. Laccaria rubroalba sp. nov. (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southwestern China. Phytotaxa 2016, 284, 041–050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Popa, F.; Jimenéz, S.Y.C.; Weisenborn, J.; Donges, K.; Rexer, K.H.; Piepenbring, M. A new Laccaria species from cloud forest of Fortuna, Panama. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mueller, G.M.; Vellinga, E.C. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Laccaria B. & Br.: Laccaria amethystea, L. fraterna, L. laccata, L. pumila, and their synonyms. Persoonia 1986, 13, 27–43. [Google Scholar]
  20. Osmundson, T.W.; Cripps, C.L.; Mueller, G.M. Morphological and molecular systematics of Rocky Mountain alpine Laccaria. Mycologia 2005, 97, 949–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wilson, A.W.; Hosaka, K.; Perry, B.A.; Mueller, G.M. Laccaria (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from Tibet (Xizang Autonomous Region, China). Mycoscience 2013, 54, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Popa, F.; Rexer, K.H.; Donges, K.; Yang, Z.L.; Kost, G. Three new Laccaria species from Southwest China (Yunnan). Mycol. Prog. 2014, 13, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cho, H.J.; Lee, H.; Park, M.S.; Park, K.H.; Park, J.H.; Cho, Y.; Kim, C.; Lim, Y.W. Two new species of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Korea. Mycobiology 2020, 48, 1786961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Singer, R. Notes sur le genre Laccaria. Bull. Trimest. Société Mycol. Fr. 1967, 83, 104–123. [Google Scholar]
  25. Besson, M.; Kühner, R. Ultrastructure de la paroi sporique des Laccaria Berk. et Br. (Agaricales). C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1971, 272, 1078–1081. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lahaie, D.G. The Genus Laccaria in the Boreal Forest of Eastern Canada. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mueller, G.M.; Sundberg, W.J. A floristic study of Laccaria (Agaricales) in southern Illinois. Nova Hedwig. 1981, 34, 577–597. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mueller, G.M. New North American species of Laccaria (Agaricales). Mycotaxon 1984, 20, 101–116. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pázmány, D. Zur Systematik der Gattung Laccaria Bk. et Br. Z. Mykol. 1994, 60, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, L.; Yang, Z.L.; Liu, J.H. Two new species of Laccaria (Basidiomycetes) from China. Nova Hedwig. 2004, 79, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mu, L.; Bau, T. Three new records of Laccaria from Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia in China. Mycosystema 2016, 35, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vincenot, L.; Popa, F.; Laso, F.; Donges, K.; Rexer, K.H.; Kost, G.; Yang, Z.L.; Nara, K.; Selosse, M.A. Out of Asia: Biogeography of fungal populations reveals Asian origin of diversification of the Laccaria amethystina complex, and two new species of violet Laccaria. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 939–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, F. Two new species of Laccaria from South China, with a note on Hodophilus glaberipes. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 525–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, K.; Liu, D.M.; Li, G.J.; Liu, T.Z.; Xie, M.L.; Du, Z.; Wei, T.Z. Taxonomy of Laccaria in China Based on the Specimens Collected in the HMAS. J. Fungal Res. 2023, 20, 271–284. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour; Eyre Methuen: London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  36. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rehner, S.A.; Buckley, E.A. Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: Evidence for cryptic diver sification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 2005, 97, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Matheny, P.B. Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe, Agaricales). Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 2005, 35, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Katoh, K.; Kuma, K.I.; Toh, H.; Miyata, T. MAFFT version5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.L.; Li, W.X.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.; von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Effificient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hofstetter, V.; Buyck, B.; Eyssartier, G.; Schnee, S.; Gindro, K. The unbearable lightness of sequenced-based identification. Fungal Diver. 2019, 96, 243–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hazard, C.; Kruitbos, L.; Davidson, H.; Mbow, F.T.; Taylor, A.F.S.; Johnson, D. Strain Identity of the Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Laccaria bicolor Is More Important than Richness in Regulating Plant and Fungal Performance under Nutrient Rich Conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 26, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cho, H.J.; Park, M.S.; Lee, H.; Oh, S.Y.; Wilson, A.W.; Mueller, G.M.; Lim, Y.W. A systematic revision of the ectomycorrhizal genus Laccaria from Korea. Mycologia 2018, 110, 948–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Corrales, A.; Wilson, A.W.; Mueller, G.M.; Ovrebo, C. Novel Laccaria Species from Juglandaceae Forest in Panama With Notes on Their Ecology. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; de Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud Mycol. 2019, 92, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Teasdale, S.E.; Beulke, A.K.; Guy, P.L.; Orlovich, D.A. Environmental barcoding of the ectomycorrhizal fungal genus Cortinarius. Fungal Diver. 2013, 58, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kranabetter, J.M.; Friesen, J.; Gamiet, S.; Kroeger, P. Epigeous fruiting bodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi as indicators of soil fertility and associated nitrogen status of boreal forests. Mycorrhiza 2009, 19, 535–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kuo, M. Laccaria pumila. 2010. Available online: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/laccaria_pumila.html (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  56. Baird, R.; Stokes, C.E.; Frampton, J.; Smith, B.; Watson, C.; Pilhrim, C.; Scruggs, M. Diversity and density of the EM fungal community present in high elevation Fraser fir forests of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. N. Am. Fungi 2014, 9, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Palmer, J.M.; Lindner, D.L.; Volk, T.J. Ectomycorrhizal characterization of an American chestnut (Castanea dentata)-dominated community in Western Wisconsin. Mycorrhiza 2008, 19, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Geml, J.; Timling, I.; Robinson, C.H.; Lennon, N.; Nusbaum, H.C.; Brochmann, C.; Noordeloos, M.E.; Taylor, D.L. An arctic community of symbiotic fungi assembled by long-distance dispersers: Phylogenetic diversity of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes in Svalbard based on soil and sporocarp DNA. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Montagne, J.P.F.C. Sylloge Generum Specierumque Cryptogamarum, quas in Variis Operibus Descriptas Iconibusque Illustratas, nunc ad Diagnosim Reductas, Nonnullasque novas Interjectas; Parisiis, J.-B., Ed.; Baillire, France; 1856; pp. 1–498. Available online: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/5403 (accessed on 25 January 2008).
  60. Ramos, A.; Bandala, V.M.; Montoya, L. A new species and a new record of Laccaria (Fungi, Basidiomycota) found in a relict forest of the endangered Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana. MycoKeys 2017, 27, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lee, W.D.; Lee, H.; Fong, J.J.; Oh, S.Y.; Park, M.S.; Quan, Y.; Jung, P.E.; Lim, Y.W. A checklist of the basidiomycetous macrofungi and a record of five new species from Mt. Oseo in Korea. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schoch, C.L.; Seifert, K.A.; Huhndorf, S.; Robert, V.; Spouge, J.L.; Levesque, C.A. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6241–6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mueller, G.M. Laccaria longipes, a new North America species of the Laccaria laccata complex. Mycotaxon 1991, 40, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kuo, M. Laccaria laccata. 2010. Available online: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/laccaria_laccata.html (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  65. McNabb, R.F.R. The tricholomataceae of New Zealand 1. Laccaria Berk. & Br. New Zealand J. Bot. 1972, 10, 461–484. [Google Scholar]
  66. Imamura, A. Report on Laccaria amethystina, newly confirmed as an ammonia fungus. Mycoscience 2001, 42, 623–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kuo, M. Laccaria amethystina. 2010. Available online: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/laccaria_amethystina.html (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  68. Hongo, T. Notulae mycologicae. Mem. Shiga. Univ. 1971, 21, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  69. Deepna Latha, K.P.; Anil Raj, K.N.; Manimohan, P. Laccaria violaceotincta: A new species from tropical India based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. Phytotaxa 2019, 392, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bon, M. Tricholomataceae de Franee et d’Europe oeeidentale. Tribu Clitocybeae Fay. Doc. Mycol. 1983, 51, 1–51. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ballero, M.; Contu, M. Tassonomia ed eeologia del genere Laccaria Berk. et Br. in Sardegna. Candollea 1989, 42, 601–611. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bi, Z.S.; Zheng, G.Y.; Li, T.H. The Macrofungus Flora of China’s Guangdong Province; Chinese University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuan, M.S.; Sun, P.Q. Mushrooms of Sichuan; Sichuan Science and Technology Press: Chengdu, China, 1995; pp. 1–737. [Google Scholar]
  74. Mao, X.L. The Macrofungi in China; Henan Science and Technology Press: Zhengzhou, China, 2000; pp. 1–719. [Google Scholar]
  75. Li, Y.; Li, T.H.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Dai, Y.C. Atlas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources; Central China Farmer’s Publishing House: Zhengzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Laccaria generated from the ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 dataset. Bootstrap values (ML ≥ 70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.95) are shown around branches. Sequences from type specimens are marked with (T), and the new species is indicated in bold and blue area.
Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Laccaria generated from the ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 dataset. Bootstrap values (ML ≥ 70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.95) are shown around branches. Sequences from type specimens are marked with (T), and the new species is indicated in bold and blue area.
Jof 09 01179 g001
Figure 2. Fresh basidiomata of five new species of Laccaria. (a,b) L. miniata (Type, GDGM76043). (c,d) L. nanglingensis ((c). GDGM84949; (d). Type, GDGM84954). (e,f) L. neovinaceoavellanea ((e). Type, GDGM52852; (f). GDGM89621). (g,h) L. rufobrunnea ((g). Type, GDGM82787, (h). GDGM89627). (i,j) L. umbilicata ((i). Type GDGM82911, (j). GDGM82851). Bars: (a,b) = 20 mm, (cj) = 50 mm.
Figure 2. Fresh basidiomata of five new species of Laccaria. (a,b) L. miniata (Type, GDGM76043). (c,d) L. nanglingensis ((c). GDGM84949; (d). Type, GDGM84954). (e,f) L. neovinaceoavellanea ((e). Type, GDGM52852; (f). GDGM89621). (g,h) L. rufobrunnea ((g). Type, GDGM82787, (h). GDGM89627). (i,j) L. umbilicata ((i). Type GDGM82911, (j). GDGM82851). Bars: (a,b) = 20 mm, (cj) = 50 mm.
Jof 09 01179 g002
Figure 3. Basidiospores of the five new Laccaria species under SEM. (a,b) L. miniata (GDGM76043). (c) L. nanglingensis (GDGM84954). (d,e) L. neovinaceoavellanea (GDGM52852). (f) L. rufobrunnea (f. GDGM82787). (g,h) L. umbilicata (GDGM82911). Bars: (ah) = 4 μm.
Figure 3. Basidiospores of the five new Laccaria species under SEM. (a,b) L. miniata (GDGM76043). (c) L. nanglingensis (GDGM84954). (d,e) L. neovinaceoavellanea (GDGM52852). (f) L. rufobrunnea (f. GDGM82787). (g,h) L. umbilicata (GDGM82911). Bars: (ah) = 4 μm.
Jof 09 01179 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic features of Laccaria miniata (GDGM76043, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Baisidiospores (c) Pileipellis. Bars: (a,c) = 20 μm, (b) = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Microscopic features of Laccaria miniata (GDGM76043, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Baisidiospores (c) Pileipellis. Bars: (a,c) = 20 μm, (b) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01179 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic features of Laccaria nanlingensis (GDGM84954, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Stipitipellis and caulocystidia. (e) Pileipellis Bars: (a,c,d) = 10 μm; (b,e) = 20 μm.
Figure 5. Microscopic features of Laccaria nanlingensis (GDGM84954, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Stipitipellis and caulocystidia. (e) Pileipellis Bars: (a,c,d) = 10 μm; (b,e) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 01179 g005
Figure 6. Microscopic features of Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea (GDGM52852, Holotype). (a) Basidispores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Caulocystidia. (e) Pileipellis. (f) Stipitipellis. Bars: (a,e) = 10 μm; (bd,f) = 20 μm.
Figure 6. Microscopic features of Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea (GDGM52852, Holotype). (a) Basidispores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Caulocystidia. (e) Pileipellis. (f) Stipitipellis. Bars: (a,e) = 10 μm; (bd,f) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 01179 g006
Figure 7. Microscopic features of Laccaria rufobrunnea (GDGM82878, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia; (d) Pileipellis. Bars: (a,c) = 10 μm; (b,d) = 20 μm.
Figure 7. Microscopic features of Laccaria rufobrunnea (GDGM82878, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia; (d) Pileipellis. Bars: (a,c) = 10 μm; (b,d) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 01179 g007
Figure 8. Microscopic features of Laccaria umbilicata (GDGM82911, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Cheilocystidia. (c) Basidiospores. (d) Caulocystidia. (e) Stipitipellis and caulocystidia. (f) Pileipellis Bars: (a,b,d) = 20 μm; (c,e,f) = 10 μm.
Figure 8. Microscopic features of Laccaria umbilicata (GDGM82911, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Cheilocystidia. (c) Basidiospores. (d) Caulocystidia. (e) Stipitipellis and caulocystidia. (f) Pileipellis Bars: (a,b,d) = 20 μm; (c,e,f) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01179 g008
Table 1. Taxa included in molecular phylogenetic analyses and their GenBank accession numbers. Accession numbers in bold indicate newly generated sequences in this study. Taxa marked with T represent type specimens.
Table 1. Taxa included in molecular phylogenetic analyses and their GenBank accession numbers. Accession numbers in bold indicate newly generated sequences in this study. Taxa marked with T represent type specimens.
TaxaSpecimensLocalityGenBank Accession Nos.References
ITSLSUtef1rpb2
Laccaria acanthospora (T)AWW485Tibet, ChinaJX504102JX504186KU686073KU685916[21]
L. acanthosporaHKAS45998Tibet, ChinaJX504161KU685870_KU686069[1]
L. affinisGMM7618FranceKM067852___[48]
L. affinisGMM7619FranceKM067853___[48]
L. affinisGMM7602FranceKM067842___[48]
L. albaGMM6131ChinaJX504131JX504210KU686079KU685930[21]
L. albaKUN 20120807-69ChinaMG519542MG519583MG551649MG551616[1]
L. albaAWW438ChinaJX504094JX504178KU686072KU685912[1]
L. amethysteo-occidentalisAWW557USAMT279220MT279200MT436061MT431174[49]
L. amethysteo-occidentalisAWW556CanadaJX504107JX504191_KU685919[1]
L. amethystinaGMM7633FranceJX504154JX504228__[21]
L.  angustilamellaGMM6171FranceJX504132 __[21]
L.  angustilamellaHKAS58714Tibet, ChinaJX504168JX504244__[21]
L.  anglicaAngFrFranceGQ406459___[49]
L.  anglicaScoFrFranceGQ406468___[49]
L. araneosa (T)KNU20120912-40KoreaMG519548MG519588MG551654MG551621[50]
L.  araneosaKUN20120912-25KoreaMG519550MG519590MG551656MG551623[1]
L.  araneosaSFC20130917-21KoreaMG519549MG519589_MG551622[1]
L. aurantia (T)KUN-F78557Yunnan, ChinaJQ670895___[22]
L.  aurantiaHKAS122365Yunnan, ChinaON794252___Direct Submission
L. aurantiaMB-FB-001106Yunnan, ChinaJQ670895___[22]
L.  bicolorBicSerFranceGQ406463___[49]
L.  bicolorLbCUnited KingdomMF958447___[51]
L.  bicolorAWW585USAJX504111___[21]
L.  bicolorCBS:559.96NetherlandsMH862598___[52]
L. bullipellis (T)AWW465Tibet, ChinaJX504100JX504184_KU685914[21]
L. canaliculataGMM7222AustraliaKU685664KU685807_KU685950[1]
L. canaliculataGMM7264AustraliaKU685674KU685817_KU685957[1]
L. canaliculataGMM7267AustraliaJX504137JX504213KU686093KU685960[1]
L. canaliculataGMM7251AustraliaKU685669KU685812KU686090KU685955[1]
L. dallingiiCorrales 543PanamaMT279238MT279213MT436076MT431187[53]
L. dallingii (T)Corrales 571PanamaMT279240MT279214__[53]
L. diospyricolaSN 10IndiaMK776767___Direct Submission
L. fagacicola (T)HKAS90435Yunnan, ChinaMW540806___[2]
L.  fagacicolaHKAS107731Yunnan, ChinaMW540807___[2]
L. fengkaiensis (T)HKAS106739Guangdong, ChinaMN585657___[33]
L.  fengkaiensisHKAS106741Guangdong, ChinaMN585658___[33]
L.  fengkaiensisLF 1841ChinaMT822919___[54]
L. fibrillosaGMM7508New ZealandKU685706KU685847_KU685989[1]
L. fibrillosaGMM7562New ZealandKU685714KU685855_KU685996[1]
L. fortunensisCorrales 74PanamaMT279246___[53]
L. fortunensisCorrales 75PanamaMT279247___[53]
L. fortunensisCorrales 25PanamaMT279245___[53]
L. fulvogrisea (T)KUN-F78556Yunnan, ChinaJQ670896___[22]
L.  fulvogriseaKUN-FB-101105Yunnan, ChinaJQ681210___[22]
L.  fulvogriseaMB-FB-001101Yunnan, ChinaJQ670896___Direct Submission
L. galerinoidesF1081213ChileKU685634KU685778KU686078KU685929[1]
L. galerinoidesF1080983ArgentinaKU685632KU685776KU686077KU685927[1]
L. gomeziiF1102433Costa Rica_MT279205_MT431180[1]
L. gomeziiGMM7173Costa RicaMT279227MT279207MT436071MT431182[51]
L. griseolilacinaSFC20190919-48South KoreaMT322981MT322983MT333269MT333266[23]
L. himalayensis (T)AWW484Tibet, ChinaJX504101JX504185_KU685915[21]
L.  himalayensisAWW445Tibet, ChinaJX504096JX504180__[21]
L.  himalayensisAWW463Tibet, ChinaJX504098JX504182_KU685913[21]
L. indohimalayanaKD 17-46IndiaMK575505___Direct Submission
L. indohimalayana (T)KD 17-20IndiaMK584157___Direct Submission
L. indohimalayanaCAL 1754IndiaNR_171835___Direct Submission
L. japonica (T)TNS-F64167Honshu, JapanKU962988___[32]
L.  japonicaSFC20130704-34KoreaMG519521MG519568MG551596MG551598[55]
L.  japonicaSFC20130928-07JapanKU962975MG519565MG551632MG551594[55]
L.  japonicaSFC20120726-28JapanMG519520MG519567MG551634MG551597[1]
L. laccataSMI199CanadaFJ845416___[56]
L. laccataL16MexicoMF039229___Direct Submission
L. laccataDAVFP:26723CanadaJF899561___Direct Submission
L. laccataSporomeMexicoKY969630___Direct Submission
L. laccata var. pallidifoliaHMJAU26932ChinaKM246792___[20]
L. laccata var. pallidifoliaGMM7605FranceJX504146KU685901KU686154KU686048[21]
L. laccata var. pallidifolialac 1370USADQ149849___[20]
L. lateritiaGMM7531AustraliaKU685709KU685850KU686118KU685992[1]
L. lateritiaGMM7221AustraliaKU685663KU685806_KU685949[1]
L. lateritiaGMM7250AustraliaKU685668KU685811_KU685954[1]
L.longipesMQ 18R253-QFB30769CanadaMN992191___Direct Submission
L.longipesHMJAU26933ChinaKM246793___[31]
L.  macrobasidiaHBAU15557ChinaMW871602___Direct Submission
L.  macrocystidiaGMM7616FranceKM067850KU685863 KU686004[48]
L.  macrocystidiaGMM7612FranceKM067841KU685861KU686122KU686002[48]
L.  macrocystidiaGMM7626FranceKM067856KU685865KU686125KU686006[48]
L.  masoniaeGMM7443AustraliaJX504139JX504215__[21]
L.  masoniaeGMM7240AustraliaKU685667KU685810_KU685953[21]
L.  masoniaeGMM7200AustraliaKU685656KU685799KU686084KU685941[21]
L.  miniata  (T)GDGM76043Guangdong, ChinaOR689440OR785476__This study
L.  montanaC5442SwitzerlandOR419936___Direct Submission
L.  montanaM5464SwitzerlandOR419935___Direct Submission
L.  montanaTWO 319USADQ149862___[32]
L. moshuijun (T)HKAS93732Yunnan, ChinaKU962989___[32]
L.  moshuijunMB-001113ChinaKU962985___[32]
L. moshuijunHMAS 131870 ChinaON877154___[32]
L.  murinaNara_LaM90JapanAB211271___[55]
L.  murinaFBSR-535PakistanOQ881021___[57]
L.  murinaASIS24249KoreaMG519552MG519592MG551658MG551625[55]
L.  nanlingensisGDGM84949Guangdong, ChinaOR689441OR785477OR826274OR835198This study
L.  nanlingensis  (T)GDGM84954Guangdong, ChinaOR689442OR785478OR826273OR835199This study
L. negrimarginata (T)BAP360Tibet, ChinaJX504120 [21])
L. negrimarginataGMM7631Tibet, ChinaJX504153JX504227KU686130KU686011[21]
L. negrimarginataHMAS272239Tibet, ChinaON877189___[30]
L.  neovinaceoavellanea  (T)GDGM52852Jiangxi, ChinaOR689447OR785479__This study
L. neovinaceoavellaneaGDGM53063Jiangxi, ChinaOR689448OR785480__This study
L. neovinaceoavellaneaGDGM89621Yunnan, ChinaOR689449OR785481__This study
L.  nitrophilaCorrales 467PanamaMT279233___[51]
L.  nitrophilaCorrales 595PanamaMT279236MT279211MT436074MT431186[51]
L.  nitrophilaCorrales 423PanamaMT279235___Direct Submission
L.  nobilisnob1469USADQ149854___[20]
L.  nobilis nob42527USADQ149861___[20]
L.  nobilisF1091206USAKU685636KU685779__[1]
L.  ohiensisGMM7564New ZealandKU685715KU685856_KU685997[1,21]
L.  ohiensisGMM7593NZNew ZealandKU685718KU685860KU686121KU685994[1]
L.  oblongosporaOblFrFranceGQ406466___[49]
L.  ochropurpureaJMP0038USAEU819479___[58]
L. ochropurpureaPRL3777USAJX504169JX504246_KU686024[21]
L. ochropurpureaPRL4777USAKU685721KU685883_KU686025[21]
L. pallidorosea (T)HKAS107730Yunnan, ChinaMW540808___[2]
L. pallidoroseaHKAS53170Yunnan, ChinaMW540809___[2]
L. paraphysataPDD:80007New ZealandKM975424___Direct Submission
L. paraphysataPDD:95230New ZealandKM975427___Direct Submission
L. parva (T)SFC20120919-05KoreaMG519529MG519573MG551640MG551604[59]
L. parvaSFC20121001-08KoreaMG519530MG519574__[59]
L. parvaSFC20120906-01KoreaMG519527MG519572MG551639MG551602[59]
L. populina (T)GDOR411ItalyMn871894___Direct Submission
L. prava (T)HKAS106742Guangdong, ChinaMN585660___[33]
L. pravaHKAS106745Guangdong, ChinaMN585661___[33]
L. proximaGMM7584RussiaKU685717KU685858KU686120KU685999[1]
L. proximaGMM7596FranceJX504142JX504217KU686151KU686045[1]
L. proximaGMM7631FranceJX504152JX504226__[1]
L. pseudomontanaCripps 1771USADQ149870___[20]
L. pseudomontana (T)Cripps 1625USADQ149871___[20]
L. pumilaGMM7637FranceJX504156JX504229KU686158_[21]
L. pumilaGG125_86NetherlandsGU234161___[60]
L. roseoalbescensLM5042MexicoKJ874327KJ874330__[18]
L. roseoalbescensLM5099MexicoKJ874328KJ874331__[18]
L. roseoalbescensVB4678MexicoKJ590509KJ590510__[18]
L. roseoalbescensVB4677MexicoKJ590508KJ590511__[18]
L. rubroalbaHKAS90766Yunnan, ChinaKX449359___[17]
L. rubroalbaHKAS90751Yunnan, ChinaKX449360___[17]
L. rubroalbaHMAS131833ChinaON877153___[17]
L. rufobrunnea  (T)GDGM82878Yunnan, ChinaOR689443OR785482OR826272OR835197This study
L. rufobrunneaGDGM89627Yunnan, ChinaOR689444OR785483 This study
L. salmonicolor (T)GMM7596tibetTibet, ChinaJX504143JX504218KU686151KU686045[21]
L. salmonicolorGMM7602Tibet, ChinaJX504145JX504220__[21]
L. squarrosaDM63MexicoMF669958MF669965__[61]
L. squarrosaDM121MexicoMF669960MF669967__[61]
L. squarrosaDM93MexicoMF669959MF669966__[61]
L. stellataSYC 207PanamaKP877339___[62]
L. stellataSYC 109 PanamaKP877340___[62]
L. stellataCorrales 27PanamaMT279231MT279210_MT431185[51]
L. striatulaHMJAU59796ChinaOR468697___Direct Submission
L. striatula1475 PREMIXUSAOQ612526___Direct Submission
L. striatulaCNV105USAMT345281___Direct Submission
L. tetrasporaF1080957 ArgentinaKU685631KU685775__[1]
L. tetrasporaCT-4259ArgentinaMH930294___Direct Submission
L. torosaSFC20150902-17FranceMG519561___[50]
L. torosaKA12-1306FranceMG519562___[50]
L. tortilis (T)ASIS22273KoreaMG519533___[50]
L. tortilisGMM7635FranceJX504155KU685906KU686156KU686053[21]
‘L. tortilis’AWW545USAJX504106JX504190_KU685917
‘L. tortilis’F1116205USAKU685641KU685785__[1]
L.  trichodermophoraGO-2010-082 MexicoKC152152___Direct Submission
L.  trichodermophoraHC-PNNT-099MexicoKT875034___Direct Submission
L.  trullisata PRL7587Tibet, ChinaJX504170JX504247KU686153KU686047[21]
L.  trullisataWCG2075KM067894___[48]
L.  umbilicataGDGM82883Yunnan,ChinaOR689445OR785485OR826270OR835194This study
L.  umbilicata  (T)GDGM82911Yunnan,ChinaOR689446OR785486OR826268OR835192This study
L. versiforma (T)SFC20120926-01KoreaMG519556MG519594MG551660MG551627[50]
L.  versiformaASIA20939KoreaMG519557MG519595MG551661MG551628[50]
L.  versiformaKUN20120924-82ChinaMG519559MG519596MG551662MG551629[50]
L.  violaceonigraGMM7520New ZealandKU685707KU685848_KU685990[1]
L.  violaceonigraGMM7580 New ZealandKU685716KU685857_KU685998[1]
L.  violaceonigraGMM7533New ZealandKU685710KU68585_KU685993[1]
L.  vinaceoavellaneaSFC201200907-18KoreaMG519536MG519578_MG551611[50]
L.  vinaceoavellaneaASIS23860KoreaMG519538_MG551645MG551613[50]
L.  vinaceoavellaneaSFC20120907-10KoreaMG519539MG519580MG551646MG551614[50]
L.  vinaceoavellaneaTNS A2986KoreaJN942810__JN993520Direct Submission
L.  vinaceobrunneaGO-2009-360MexicoKC152154___Direct Submission
L.  vinaceobrunneaGO-2009-316MexicoKC152155___Direct Submission
L.  vinaceobrunneaGO-2009-308MexicoKC152153___Direct Submission
L. yunnanensis (T)KUN-F78558Yunnan, ChinaJQ670897___[22]
L. yunnanensisHMAS271371Yunnan, ChinaON877187___[22]
L. yunnanensisHMAS264310ChinaKX496978___Direct Submission
Mythicomyces corneipesAFTOL972GermanyDQ404393AY745707DQ029197DQ447929Direct Submission
M.corneipesDAOM178138Germany____Direct Submission
Table 2. A morphological comparison of species in Laccaria described from China.
Table 2. A morphological comparison of species in Laccaria described from China.
SpeciesHabitPileus DiameterPileus ColorLamellae ColorSpores SizeReferences
L. acanthosporaOn sandy banks in mixed temperate alpine forest. Distributed in Tibet.4–15 mmOrangeLight orange7–10 × 7–10 µm (av. 8.3–8.4 × 8.9–9.2 µm); spines 2–6 µm long[21]
L. albaIn mixed forests with Abies, Betula, Fraxinus, Picea, Pinus, Quercus, Tilia and Ulmus. Distributed in Yunnan.7–32 mmReddish brown to orange, fading to buffPink-salmon7–10 × 7–11 µm (av. 8.5 × 8.6 µm); spines 1–5 (–6) µm[21]
L.  angustilamellaIn forests dominated by Quercus and Lithocarpus. Distributed in Yunnan.20–30 mmPinkish flesh-colored, slightly darker on radial striations, fading to buff with age or on dryingPinkish(8)8.5–11.5(12) × (7.5)8–11 µm (av. 9.2 ± 0.8 × 8.6 ± 0.8 µm); spines (2.0) 2.5–5 µm long[30]
L.  anthracinaIn mixed forest, near Pinus wallichiana. Distributed in Tibet.25–65 mmDark grayish brown, dark brownish gray to brownish black, fading to grayish brow after dryingPinkish brown(6.5)7–9.5(11) × (6.5)7–9(10.5) μm; spines 1.5–2.5 μm long[34]
L.  aurantiaIn mixed broad-leaved forests dominated by Quercus and Lithocarpus. Distributed in Yunnan.35–40 mmVividly orangeOrange(8)9–10 (11) × (7) 8–10 μm; spines (0.75) 1–1.5 (1.75) μm[22]
L.  bullipellisIn mixed temperate alpine conifer forest with Abies, Picea, Pinus, Rhododendron, Sorbus and Gamblea. Distributed in Tibet.22 mmBrown to orange-brownBrown to orange-brown6–9 × 6–10 µm (av. 8.3 µm); spines 1–2 µm long[21]
L.  fagacicolaIn subtropical broad-leaved forests with trees of Fagaceae. Distributed in Yunnan.20–45 mmBrownish orange to brownishBrownish orange(6.5)7–9(10) × 6.5–8(9) μm, (av. 7.7 ± 0.6 × 7.4 ± 0.5); spines 1–2(2.5) μm long[2]
L. fengkaiensisIn broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae, such as Lithocarpus haipinii, L. litseifolius, L. glaucus, L. uvariifolius, Castanopsis fissa, and C. faberi. Distributed in Guangdong.50–90 mmOrange-white, pale orange when young, light orange to pale red, pastel red with agePastel red to grayish red5.2–6.3 × 5.1–6.3 μm; spines 0.5–1.2 μm long[33]
L.  fulvogriseaIn mixed broad-leaved forests with Quercus, Eucalyptus, Lithocarpus and Ficus. Distributed in Yunnan.<30 mmGray with a violet to reddish brown tingeInitially whitish, grayish to brownish with age(7.5) 8–10 × 8–11 (7.5) μm; spines (1.5) 1.7–2.5 μm long[22]
L. himalayensisIn mixed temperate alpine conifer forest with Abies, Acer, Larix, Pinus and Salix. Distributed in Tibet.6–34 mmBrown at disk, orange-pink toward the marginOrange-pink6.5–10 µm (av. 8.1–9 µm); spines (0.5–) 1–3 µm[21]
L.  miniataIn subtropical mixed forests with trees of Fagaceae (Castanopsis fissa, C. spp.) and Pinaceae (Pinus massoniana). Distributed in Guangdong.10–15 mmRed at mass, with a deep red center, fading to reddish orange to yellowish red toward the marginPastel red, pastel pink to red8–10.5(11) × 8–10 μm, (av. 9.37 ± 0.83 × 8.8 ± 0.6); spines 0.5–1 μm longPresent study
L.  moshuijunIn subtropical mixed forests with Piuns yunnanensis, Cunninghamia lanceolata and other broad-leaved trees. Distributed in Guizhou.Up to 30 mmViolet to bluish with a brown tinge at the centerDeep violet(7.5)8–9 × (8)9–10 μm; spines 1-1.5 μm[32]
L.  nanlingensisIn subtropical, broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees. Distributed in Guangdong.30–55 mmOrange, reddish orange, orange-red, brownish orange to brownish red, fading to light orange to pale orange when dryConcolorous with pileus or darker to pale red to grayish red6.5–7.5 × 6–7 μm, av. 6.95 ± 0.15 × 6.37 ± 0.45; spines 0.5–1 μm long.Present study
L.  negrimarginataIn mixed temperate alpine conifer forest with Abies, Acer, Larix, Pinus, Quercus and Salix. Distributed in Tibet.5–15 mmOrange-brown fading to buff; squamules dark blackish brown to dark brown.Pale pink to pinkish
Gray
7–10 × 6–10 µm
(av. 7.8–9 × 7.4–8.9 µm); spines up to 2 µm
[21]
L.  pallidoroseaIn subtropical broad-leaved forests with trees of Fagaceae. Distributed in Yunnan.10–25 mmBrownish to pinkish at center, becoming cream to white towards marginWhite to pinkish(6)7–9(10) × (6)6.5–8.5(9) μm, (av. 8 ± 0.7 × 7.75 ± 0.6); spines 1.5–2 (3) μm long[2]
L.  pravaIn broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae, such as Lithocarpus glaber, L. corneus, Cyclobalanopsis pachyloma, Castanopsis faberi and C. fissa. Distributed in Guangdong.30–75 mmPastel red, pale red to reddish white, even to white with age or on drying.Reddish white to grayish red6.5–7.5 × 7–8 μm; spines 0.5–1 μm long[33]
L.  rubroalbaIn a tropical forest dominated by Fagaceae and other broad-leaf trees. Distributed in Yunnan.22–40 mmReddish white when moist or young, becoming white to paler when dryFlesh-colored(5) 6–9 (10) × 5–7 (8) μm; spines 1.2–2.7 μm long[17]
L.  rufobrunneaIn subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees and pine trees. Distributed in Yunnan.12–35 mmBrownish orange to brownish red, usually fading to brownish yellow in dry conditionPastel red, pink to purplish pink, usually changing pinkish white to purplish white in dry condition8–9 × 7–8 μm, av. 8.15 ± 0.23 × 7.57 ±0.5; spines 1–2 μm longPresent study
L.  salmonicolorIn mixed temperate alpine forests with Betula, Larix and Picea. Distributed in Tibet.10–35 mmReddish brown, to pale brown-buffPinkish salmon7.5–10 µm (av. 8.5 µm); spines 1–3 µm long[21]
L.  umbilicataIn subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Pinus yunnanensis, mixed with a small number of Fagaceae trees. Distributed in Yunnan.10–28 mmPale yellow, pale orange to light orange, changing light brown to brown when in dry conditionOrange-white, to pinkish white, sometimes pale orange to pastel red in dry conditions(7)8–10 × (7)8–10 μm, av. 9.03 ± 0.75 × 8.67 ± 0.82; spines 1.5–2 (2.5) μm longPresent study
L. neovinaceoavellaneaIn subtropical broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae. Distributed in Jiangxi.15–40 mmPastel pink, rose, purplish pink to pale violet at mass, grayish magenta to dull violet at centerConcolorous with pileus or paler7–8 × 7–8 μm, av. 7.6 ± 0.4 × 7.35 ± 0.42; spines 1–2 μm longPresent study
L.  yunnanensisIn subtropical forests. Distributed in Yunnan.60–100 mmBrownish to flesh-coloredFlesh-colored(7.5)8–9 × (7.5)8–10 μm; spines 1–1.5 μm long[22]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Gao, X.-L.; Mu, L.-Q.; Deng, W.-Q. Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny Reveal Five New Species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121179

AMA Style

Zhang M, Gao X-L, Mu L-Q, Deng W-Q. Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny Reveal Five New Species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(12):1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ming, Xue-Lian Gao, Li-Qin Mu, and Wang-Qiu Deng. 2023. "Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny Reveal Five New Species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 12: 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121179

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop