Next Article in Journal
Early Microvascular Dysfunction: Is the Vasa Vasorum a “Missing Link” in Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Losartan Prevents Hepatic Steatosis and Macrophage Polarization by Inhibiting HIF-1α in a Murine Model of NAFLD
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanism of Stimulation of Na-K-ATPase by Leukotriene D4 in Intestinal Epithelial Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress in the Molecular Imaging of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Options and Future Directions for NAFLD and NASH Treatment

1
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
2
Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7571; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147571
Submission received: 23 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 15 July 2021

Abstract

:
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, with a broad spectrum ranging from simple steatosis to advanced stage of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Although there are many undergoing clinical trials for NAFLD treatment, there is no currently approved treatment. NAFLD accounts as a major causing factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its incidence rises accompanying the prevalence of obesity and diabetes. Reprogramming of antidiabetic and anti-obesity medicine is a major treatment option for NAFLD and NASH. Liver inflammation and cellular death, with or without fibrosis account for the progression of NAFLD to NASH. Therefore, molecules and signaling pathways involved in hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, and cell death are critically important targets for the therapy of NAFLD and NASH. In addition, the avoidance of aberrant infiltration of inflammatory cytokines by treating with CCR antagonists also provides a therapeutic option. Currently, there is an increasing number of pre-clinical and clinical trials undergoing to evaluate the effects of antidiabetic and anti-obesity drugs, antibiotics, pan-caspase inhibitors, CCR2/5 antagonists, and others on NAFLD, NASH, and liver fibrosis. Non-invasive serum diagnostic markers are developed for fulfilling the need of diagnostic testing in a large amount of NAFLD cases. Overall, a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of the pathogenesis of NAFLD is helpful to choose an optimized treatment.

1. Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, ranging from simple hepatic steatosis to advanced stage of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which may lead to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1]. Recently, a new definition was suggested for NAFLD, namely metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) [2]. The prevalence of MAFLD among obese adults worldwide is 50.7%, with 95% CI 46.9–54.4 [3], relatively higher in men (59.0%, 95% CI 52.0–65.6) than women (47.5%, 95% CI 40.7–54.5). NAFLD is tightly associated with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndromes [4,5]. A survey study showed that over the past three decades, NAFLD is the only consistently increasing liver disease in the United States, accompanying the increase in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [5]. In addition to Western countries, the prevalence of NAFLD also increases in the past two decades in Asian countries, due to the sedentary lifestyle, overnutrition, obesity, and T2DM [6].
Both genetic and epigenetic factors impact the development and progression of NAFLD and NASH [7,8]. For example, the allele variant of rs738409 C > G in the patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 (PNPLA3) can increase the susceptibility of NAFLD and NASH, which was found from studies in Brazil [9,10]. In addition, NASH patients with PNPLA3 GG alleles had a higher level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and advanced liver fibrosis compared to patients with PNPLA3 CC alleles [10]. As the most evaluated epigenetic factor, DNA methylation in the CpG islands can be applied to test the progression of NAFLD to liver fibrosis and HCC [11,12]. These factors have been well described in other review papers [13,14], which will not be discussed here.
In the past decade, non-invasive diagnostic techniques and novel therapeutic strategies have been developed. In this review, we first discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms of the pathogenesis of NAFLD and NASH. Then, we summarize the latest progression of diagnostic markers applied in NAFLD, NASH, or both. Following the investigation of the molecules in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH, the potential therapeutic targets are summarized. Finally, treatment options in pre-clinical trials and clinical trials are discussed.

2. Important Molecules and Their Mediated Signaling Pathways in NAFLD and NASH

There are some essential molecules and their associated signaling pathways involved in the progression of NAFLD by mediating the lipid and sugar metabolism, cell apoptosis, liver inflammation and fibrosis, and so on. For example, the well-known transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) signaling pathway plays critical roles in liver cell apoptosis [15], inflammation [16], NAFLD, and NAFLD-related HCC progression [17,18]. The signaling pathways involved by important molecules are potential targets for developing NAFLD and NASH diagnosis and treatment. Here, we summarize some latest findings in this field (Figure 1).

2.1. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptor proteins and play a vital role in modulating fatty acid and glucose metabolism. There are three subtypes of PPARs: PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ. Currently, the single and dual PPAR agonists have been applied in the clinic for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, T2DM, metabolic syndrome and associated cardiovascular diseases [19]. For example, a PPARγ activator, rosiglitazone approved by the FDA for the treatment of T2DM, showed effects against steatosis, hepatocellular inflammation, ballooning degeneration, and fibrosis [20]. A clinical trial study showed that treatment with lobeglitazone, a dual PPARα/δ agonist, at a dose of 0.5 mg daily for 24 weeks, significantly improved glycemic, hepatic steatosis, and serum enzymes for liver damage in T2DM patients with NAFLD [21]. Another antidiabetic drug elafibranor (GFT505), a dual PPARα/δ agonist, can improve NASH and multiple cardiometabolic risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome and T2DM without worsening fibrosis at a dose of 120 mg/d for one year [22]. Molecular mechanism study showed that elafibranor can promote lipid metabolism by upregulating genes such as fatty acid-binding protein 4 (Fabp4) and acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (Acox1), and inhibit liver inflammation and liver fibrosis, evidenced by inhibited expression of genes such as C-C motif chemokine ligand 6 (CCL6), TGF-β1, type one collagen alpha 1 (Col-1A1), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1) [23].

2.2. Krüppel-Like Factors

Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) are transcription factors that play pivotal roles in diseases. For example, KLF10-deficient mice on a high-sucrose diet promoted the progression of hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis compared to wild-type mice [24]. Another study showed that KLF15 can activate twist-related protein 2 (TWIST2) to ameliorate liver steatosis and inflammation by modulating nuclear factor (NF)-κB or sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP1c)-fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) signaling pathways [25]. Global knockdown of KLF6 or hepatocyte-specifical knockdown of KLF6 can improve glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as insulin tolerance by attenuating the function of PPARα [26]. However, most of the current studies are pre-clinical investigations, and so the significant role of KLFs in human liver pathogenesis remains to be clarified.

2.3. Insulin Signaling Pathway

Insulin resistance (IR) is a feature of metabolic dysfunction, which contributes to the development of NAFLD and NASH. Hepatic insulin resistance can induce dyslipidemia and increase the development of atherosclerosis, as 100% of hepatic insulin receptor knockout (LIRKO) mice developed hypercholesterolemia but not wild-type mice on an atherogenic diet for 12 weeks [27]. An increase in IR can impair glucose homeostasis in NAFLD patients [28]. Treatment of Eugenol, an aromatic oil extracted from cloves, activated insulin receptor substrate-2 (IRS-2) to improve IR evidenced by reducing Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and hepatic triglycerides [29]. Improving hepatic insulin sensitivity by treatment of insulin sensitizers can also improve glycemia or glycose tolerance and liver function [30]. Treatment with pioglitazone, an antidiabetic drug for T2DM, can enhance insulin signaling and increase glucose uptake and lipid metabolism in adipose tissue and reduce liver gluconeogenesis [31]. In addition, pioglitazone shows a therapeutic effect against NAFLD/NASH by reducing hepatic steatosis and anti-lobular inflammation via regulating PPARγ signaling and mitochondrial gene expression [32,33].

2.4. Wnt Signaling Pathway

The Wnt family consists of 19 members in human. Among them, Wnt1, Wnt2, Wnt2b, Wnt3, Wnt3a, Wnt7a, Wnt8, Wnt8b, and Wnt10a are involved in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, while Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt11 are implicated in the noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway [34]. Activation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway can enhance the development and progression of primary liver cancers [35,36]. Canonical Wnt/β-catenin and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways are also implicated in the progression of NASH and liver fibrosis. For example, the expression of aortic carboxypeptidase-like protein (ACLP), a secreted glycosylated protein in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), is associated with mouse and human NASH by activating canonical Wnt/β-catenin [37]. The expression of Wnt5a and Wnt11 was increased by 3-fold and 15-fold, respectively, in the diet-induced mouse NASH model, indicating the involvement of non-canonical Wnt signaling in NASH progression [38].

2.5. p53 Signaling Pathway

Tumor suppressor gene p53 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and NASH [39,40]. For example, silencing p53 in human liver cancer cell lines HepG2 cells and Huh7 cells decreased palmitate-induced lipid accumulation [41]. In addition, p53-deficient mice significantly reduced hepatic lipid accumulation and high-fat diet (HFD)-induced NAFLD symptoms in vivo. Supplementation of vitamin D can reduce the senescence and apoptosis of hepatocytes via inhibiting p53, p21, and p16 signaling pathways, resulting in amelioration of NAFLD [42]. In contrast, long-term activation of p53 with low-dose of doxorubicin showed a beneficial effect on the HFD-induced murine NAFLD model, including reduction of lipogenesis, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [43], which was abrogated in liver-specific p53 deficiency mice. Moreover, p53 is also implicated in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis [44,45] and HCC [46,47].

2.6. Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), hepatic gatekeeper cells, play critical roles in liver diseases as discussed in our previous publication, including NAFLD, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC [48]. Hepatic infiltration of inflammatory monocytes and lymphocytes is of critical importance in liver injury. Under the lipotoxic condition, the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) on LSECs is significantly increased in murine and human NASH [49], which mediates the migration of inflammatory cells and results in the progression of NASH [50]. In addition, the serum level of VCAM-1 is an independent marker to predict advanced liver fibrosis (≥F2) in NAFLD patients, showing a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 83% at the cutoff point of 13.2 ng/mL [51].

2.7. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Intraperitoneal treatment of a synthetic peptide AWRK6, a candidate agonist of GLP-1, can improve hepatic steatosis, glucose metabolism, and obesity in high energy diet (HED)-induced MAFLD mice, via modulating phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Protein kinase B (AKT)/AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) signaling pathway [52]. In diabetic fatty rats, GLP-1 agonists liraglutide and Ex-4 can enhance the expression of PPARα through a GLP-1 receptor/AMPK signaling pathway [53]. However, a cohort study showed that the treatment of GLP-1 agonist did not decrease the risk of NAFLD development compared to insulin treatment [54]. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify the therapeutic role of GLP-1 in NAFLD.

2.8. MicroRNAs

The microRNAs (miRNAs) of epigenetic factors play essential roles in each step of the development and progression of NAFLD. For example, liver-specific miR-21 depletion can inhibit obesogenic diet-induced steatosis and glucose intolerance in mice [55]. Inhibiting miR-21 expression can also suppress a methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet-induced liver inflammation and fibrosis by recovering the function of PPARα, evidenced by loss of function of inhibitor of miR-21 in PPARα-deficient mice [56]. Different miRNAs can modulate different molecules or signaling pathways to impact the progression of NAFLD and NASH, which are summarized in Table 1.

3. Serum Marker for the Diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH

NAFLD is a broad spectrum of liver disease, ranging from early steatosis to NASH with advanced liver inflammation and fibrosis. The basis of treatment is dependent on the stage of NAFLD. Therefore, early diagnosis of NAFLD and the advanced stage of NASH is critically important for selecting appropriate treatment. Currently, liver biopsy is the gold standard for NAFLD diagnosis [66]. However, it is invasive and expensive and may cause improper diagnosis due to sampling bias [1]. Multi-omics have been used to investigate new non-invasive markers for the diagnosis of NAFLD and advanced liver disease [67,68]. A significant reduction of hepatic fat with advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NASH, even to the point of complete fat loss, burnt-out NASH [69]. An increase in serum adiponectin level was significantly associated with burnt-out NASH [70]. Here, we summarize the serum markers and score system for detecting NAFLD and NASH (Table 2). Performing the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) is commonly applied to evaluate the applicability of models or score systems.

4. Treatment Options for NAFLD and NASH

The liver is an essential organ for energy metabolism, and dysfunction of energy metabolism or metabolic syndrome impacts its function, resulting in the progression of NAFLD and NASH. Therefore, strategies modulating the change of metabolic dysfunction can be applied to treat liver diseases.

4.1. Lifestyle Modification

Lifestyle modification is an effective way of prevention and treatment of NAFLD. The main purpose of lifestyle modification, such as a healthy diet and exercise, is to keep appropriate body weight.

4.1.1. Calorie-Restricted Diet or Low-Fat Diet

Consumption of a diet with calories less than the required daily energy, such as the Mediterranean diet, can reduce body weight, hepatic lipid accumulation, and insulin resistance, as well as decreased serum levels of saturated fatty acid and increased serum levels of monounsaturated and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid [87]. In a controlled clinical trial, 74 patients with NAFLD were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a 12-week treatment with either a 5:2 diet with an intermittent calorie restriction (500 kcal/day for women and 600 kcal/day for men) for two non-consecutive days per week, or a low-carbohydrate high-fat diet (LCHF) with an average daily calorie intake of 1600 kcal/day for women and 1900 kcal/day for men, or general lifestyle advice from a hepatologist by choosing a healthy diet, doing exercise, reducing alcohol, and others [88]. The results indicated that both the 5:2 diet and LCHF are more effective to reduce hepatic steatosis and body weight compared to general lifestyle modification.
Dietary intervention can also modulate the components of gut microbiota and improve the health condition of NAFLD patients [89], such as reduction of body weight and improvement of insulin resistance. Consumption of a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet can reduce BMI, serum markers of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), insulin levels, and HOMA-IR compared to the control diet [90].

4.1.2. Exercise

A cross-sectional study in Korea showed that adults who have long working hours (53–83 h/week) are more likely to develop NAFLD compared to those who work the standard hours (36–42 h/week), especially in women workers and workers with age < 63 years [91]. This result was concluded after adjusting factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol, exercise, diabetes, hypertension, and serum triglyceride and total cholesterol [91]. Another study in Japan showed that there was a significant association between working hours and metabolic syndrome in men workers age ≥ 40 years [92]. The workers who worked 8–9 h/day had an odds ratio of 2.02 (95% CI, 1.04–3.90) and those working > 10 h/day with an odds ratio of 3.14 (95% CI, 1.24–7.95) in developing metabolic syndrome compared with those who worked 7–8 h/day [92]. In addition, long hours compared to standard hours may increase the risk of other diseases, such as coronary heart disease [93] and stroke [94]. However, when interpreting clinical trial results or design clinical trials for lifestyle modification, introducing some uncertainties such as Hawthorne effects among participants may result in alteration of their behavior and trial results [95,96]. Therefore, appropriate controls are critically important in these kinds of trials.
Long-term exercise can prevent NASH development by improving the phagocytic capacity of liver resident Kupffer cells (KCs) and reducing liver inflammation and fibrogenesis [97]. A murine study showed that maternal exercise can reduce western-style-diet (WSD)-induced obesity and improve hepatic lipid metabolism via activating the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and PPARγ-coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) signaling pathways [98]. Exercise-training intervention can also reduce intrahepatic fat accumulation, blood pressure, and insulin resistance in obese adults [99]. However, the working pressure and fast-food products make the change of lifestyle very difficult or cause most people to give up in this process.

4.2. Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery (BS) or weight loss surgery is considered the most effective way to treat obesity and diabetes [100,101], by reducing food absorption and modulating gut hormone secretion and metabolic dysfunction. A meta-analysis showed that BS can significantly reduce mortality and expand lifetime in adults with obesity compared to usual obesity management [102]. The bariatric procedures sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on NAFLD and NASH are similarly effective, evidenced by the change of liver function tests (LFTs) after one year of surgery [103]. Other studies indicate that there are some differences induced by BS procedures [104,105]. For example, a 5-year follow-up study (a long-term effect) showed that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) was better to improve weight loss and reduce hypertension compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), but there was no significant difference in remission of T2DM, obstructive sleep apnoea, or improvement in quality of life, data collected from two randomized clinical trials [105]. In patients aged ≥ 65, the effect of LRYGB on controlling weight loss, HbA1c (diabetes), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is better than LSG [106].

4.3. Modification of Gut Microbiota

Dysbiosis of gut microbiota is a causing factor for NAFLD, due to the change of gut hormones, metabolites, inflammatory factors. The abundance of some bacterial species is associated with the progression of liver disease. For example, there is a negative correlation between the severity of liver fibrosis and Eubacterium abundance in non-obese patients with NAFLD [107]. The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Veillonellaceae is also positively associated with the severity of liver fibrosis in non-obese subjects [108]. Modulation of gut microbiota via different strategies [109], including fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), drug therapy (e.g., antibiotics), modification of lifestyle (e.g., dietary change), the above-mentioned BS, and others can improve liver disease. A meta-analysis study showed that supplementation of probiotics can reduce the expression of inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the livers of NAFLD patients [110]. Allogenic fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from thin and healthy people to patients with NAFLD can reduce the small intestinal permeability post-six-week treatment [111]. However, the effect of FMT on liver dysfunction and metabolic syndrome remains minimal. A double-blind phase 2 trial also showed that a yearly treatment of synbiotics, a combination of probiotic and prebiotic, only modulated the change of gut microbiota but not the liver fat content and fibrotic markers [112].
Furthermore, BS modulates the components of the gut microbiota profile. For example, the predominant bacteria of Bacteroides before surgery was decreased after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) [113]. Both the altered bacterial profile and their associated metabolism following BS contribute to the impact on patients [114].

4.4. Medicines

4.4.1. Antidiabetic and Anti-Obesity Drugs

The incidence of NAFLD is significantly associated with T2DM and obesity, especially in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) [115,116]. In contrast, the incidence of NAFLD is decreased in patients with T2DM, who received treatments such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor antagonists, and insulin [115]. The reprogramming of antidiabetic or anti-obesity drugs, such as pioglitazone and saroglitazar, are being considered as the options for NAFLD/NASH treatment. Saroglitazar, a double agonist against PPAR-α/γ, can reduce hepatic lipid accumulation, lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, and liver fibrosis in a mouse NASH model [117]. A phase 2 clinical trial study showed that 4 mg of saroglitazar can significantly decrease ALT and liver fat content, improve insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in patients with NAFLD or NASH [118].
Farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a nuclear receptor that can be activated by bile acids (BAs), plays a critical role in hepatic lipid accumulation [119,120,121], as well as glucose homeostasis [122]. Cilofexor (GS-9674), a nonsteroidal agonist of FXR with an EC50 of 43 nM, has anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects. A phase 2 trial study showed that cilofexor significantly improved hepatic steatosis and decreased serum γ-glutamyltransferase, C4, and primary bile acids, but not liver fibrosis and stiffness in NASH patients [123].
SGLT2 inhibitors, such as canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin, have pleiotropic functions to treat NAFLD and T2DM by preventing de novo lipogenesis, liver inflammation and cell apoptosis, and increasing fatty acid oxidation [124].
GLP-1 receptor agonists can inhibit hepatic fat accumulation as the effect of metformin and insulin-based treatment [125]. In addition, they can moderately improve liver fibrosis. Metformin is the first-line treatment for patients with T2DM, which can control high blood sugar [126] and decrease total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides [127]. However, the effects of metformin, as well as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in NAFLD treatment, remain debatable [128].

4.4.2. Antioxidants

A meta-analysis of clinical trials showed that adjuvant vitamin E treatment is favorable for adult patients with NAFLD compared to pediatric patients [129]. Vitamin E can also improve NASH in HIV-infected patients, evidenced by the reduction of serum biomarker ALT and cytokeratin 18 (CK-18) for hepatocyte apoptosis [130].
Polyphenols as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant reagents show a protective effect in liver disease, and consumption of polyphenol-rich diets also pride beneficial effects for NAFLD patients [131]. For example, a high intake of lignans, a large group of low molecular weight polyphenols in plants such as whole grains, reduces the incidence of NAFLD [132].

4.4.3. Antibiotics

Rifaximin has been used for treating hepatic encephalopathy, and it also has a protective effect against intestinal leaking [133]. A 28-day treatment of rifaximin (1200 mg/day) in NASH patients resulted in a dramatic reduction of serum endotoxin, AST, ALT, γ-glutamyltransferase, LDL, and ferritin, and a mild reduction of the average BMI [134]. However, the effect of rifaximin on patients with simple steatosis was significantly reduced, with only effects on the reduction of ALT and ferritin [134].

4.4.4. Anti-Cell Death Reagents

Lipotoxicity causes hepatic cell death and promotes the progression of NAFLD and NASH, which induces proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Therefore, inhibiting cellular death is critically important for the treatment of chronic liver disease. For example, selonsertib, a selective inhibitor of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1, showed an antifibrotic effect in patients with NASH and F2-F3 liver fibrosis [135]. However, two phase 3 clinical trials showed that selonsertib monotherapy did not improve liver fibrosis in patients with NASH and bridging fibrosis (F3) or compensated cirrhosis (F4) compared to placebo control treatment [136]. In another phase 2 trial showed that a combination of selonsertib with cilofexor or firsocostat (a small molecule inhibitor of acetyl-CoA carboxylase) improved steatosis, while a combination of selonsertib with cilofexor improved the early stage of liver fibrosis (F1) [137]. These completed trials showed that selonsertib has some effects on the early stage of NASH, but not advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. Metformin, a first-line antidiabetic drug, also shows a protective effect against palmitate-induced necrosis in primary rat hepatocytes by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and improving mitochondrial function [138].

4.4.5. Antifibrotic Reagents

Antifibrotic reagents can prevent the progression of liver fibrosis and NAFLD to fibrotic NASH. The activated HSCs are a source of predominant extracellular matrix proteins-producing cells during liver fibrosis [139,140]. Anti-liver fibrosis methods mainly consist of inhibiting the activation and growth of HSCs, anti-inflammation, anti-cell death agents, and regulating the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. The abovementioned methods for the treatment of NAFLD or NASH are also treatment options for liver fibrosis. Some natural products have multiple effects. For example, Scoparone, a bioactive compound from a Chinese herb, can decrease hepatic steatosis, inflammation, cell death, and fibrosis in mice with diet-induced NASH [141].
In addition, there are some other targets for NAFLD and NASH treatments, such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [142], estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα) [143], bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [144], and KLFs [24,145]. The treatment options for NAFLD/NASH are summarized in the graphic picture (Figure 2). Overall, regulating liver and gut metabolism, liver inflammation, fibrosis, and cell death can effectively prevent the development of NAFLD and NASH.

5. Clinical Trials

This review summarizes the completed clinical trials targeting the improvement of NAFLD and NASH (Table 3). The data were collected from the website https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 20 June 2021) with the keywords NAFLD, NASH, and treatment. The testing candidates may not provide the prospective effect as shown in preclinical studies. For example, a phase 2 clinical trial showed that GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide can improve NASH resolution without worsening liver fibrosis compared to placebo, but semaglutide did not significantly ameliorate liver fibrosis in NASH patients [146].
This review summarizes the completed clinical trials targeting the improvement of NAFLD and NASH (Table 3). The data were collected from the website https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 20 June 2021) with the keywords NAFLD, NASH, and treatment. The testing candidates may not provide the prospective effect as shown in preclinical studies. For example, a phase 2 clinical trial showed that GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide can improve NASH resolution without worsening liver fibrosis compared to placebo, but semaglutide did not significantly ameliorate liver fibrosis in NASH patients [146].

6. Conclusions

The incidence of NAFLD and NASH is increasing currently, which is positively associated with the prevalence of obesity and diabetes. NAFLD and NASH are the major increasing factors that contribute to the progression of HCC, the primary liver cancer. However, there is no currently approved treatment for NAFLD and NASH. New non-invasive diagnostic markers such miRNAs have been evaluated for future diagnosis of NAFLD. Early diagnosis of the progression of NAFLD to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, or HCC is critically important due to irreversible or difficulty to reverse of server liver disease. Some key molecules such as PPARs, GLP-1, miRNAs, and KLFs are potential targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases including NAFLD and NASH. Preclinical studies and clinical trials have been processed to evaluate potential treatment options for NAFLD and NASH, including synbiotics, pan-caspase inhibitors, CCR2/5 antagonists, FXR agonists, and so on. A combined treatment such as combined medical treatment and physical activity could reduce the treatment time and improve the outcome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and data collection, C.Z. and M.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z. and M.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and M.Y. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting reported results can be found in the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Castera, L.; Friedrich-Rust, M.; Loomba, R. Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1264–1281.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Eslam, M.; Newsome, P.N.; Sarin, S.K.; Anstee, Q.M.; Targher, G.; Romero-Gomez, M.; Zelber-Sagi, S.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Dufour, J.-F.; Schattenberg, J.M.; et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, J.; Ayada, I.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Wen, T.; Ma, Z.; Bruno, M.J.; de Knegt, R.J.; Cao, W.; et al. Estimating global prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in overweight or obese adults. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lazarus, J.V.; Palayew, A.; Carrieri, P.; Ekstedt, M.; Marchesini, G.; Novak, K.; Ratziu, V.; Romero-Gómez, M.; Tacke, F.; Zelber-Sagi, S.; et al. European ‘NAFLD Preparedness Index’—Is Europe ready to meet the challenge of fatty liver disease? JHEP Rep. 2021, 3, 100234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dongiovanni, P.; Paolini, E.; Corsini, A.; Sirtori, C.R.; Ruscica, M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease diagnoses and cardiovascular diseases: From epidemiology to drug approaches. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 51, e13519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fan, J.-G.; Kim, S.-U.; Wong, V.W.-S. New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 862–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Del Campo, J.A.; Gallego-Durán, R.; Gallego, P.; Grande, L. Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jonas, W.; Schürmann, A. Genetic and epigenetic factors determining NAFLD risk. Mol. Metab. 2020, 101111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lisboa, Q.C.; Nardelli, M.J.; Pereira, P.D.A.; Miranda, D.M.; Ribeiro, S.N.; Costa, R.S.N.; Versiani, C.A.; Vidigal, P.V.T.; Ferrari, T.C.D.A.; Couto, C.A. PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 polymorphisms in Brazilian patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Hepatol. 2020, 12, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mazo, D.F.; Malta, F.M.; Stefano, J.T.; Salles, A.P.M.; Gomes-Gouvea, M.S.; Nastri, A.C.S.; Almeida, J.R.; Pinho, J.R.R.; Carrilho, F.J.; Oliveira, C.P. Validation of PNPLA3 polymorphisms as risk factor for NAFLD and liver fibrosis in an admixed population. Ann. Hepatol. 2019, 18, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hardy, T.; Zeybel, M.; Day, C.P.; Dipper, C.; Masson, S.; McPherson, S.; Henderson, E.; Tiniakos, D.; White, S.; French, J.; et al. Plasma DNA methylation: A potential biomarker for stratification of liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2017, 66, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tian, Y.; Arai, E.; Makiuchi, S.; Tsuda, N.; Kuramoto, J.; Ohara, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Ito, N.; Ojima, H.; Hiraoka, N.; et al. Aberrant DNA methylation results in altered gene expression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinomas. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 146, 2461–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hyun, J.; Jung, Y. DNA Methylation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eslam, M.; Valenti, L.; Romeo, S. Genetics and epigenetics of NAFLD and NASH: Clinical impact. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, D.; Wang, K.; Li, K.; Xu, R.; Chang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, P.; Han, X. Ets-1 deficiency alleviates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis via weakening TGF-β1 signaling-mediated hepatocyte apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yun, Y.; Feng, L.; Hao, Q. Secreted modular calcium-binding protein 2 promotes high fat diet (HFD)-induced hepatic steatosis through enhancing lipid deposition, fibrosis and inflammation via targeting TGF-β1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 509, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lai, C.-Y.; Yeh, K.-Y.; Lin, C.-Y.; Hsieh, Y.-W.; Lai, H.-H.; Chen, J.-R.; Hsu, C.-C.; Her, G. MicroRNA-21 Plays Multiple Oncometabolic Roles in the Process of NAFLD-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma via PI3K/AKT, TGF-β, and STAT3 Signaling. Cancers 2021, 13, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nair, B.; Nath, L.R. Inevitable role of TGF-β1 in progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. 2020, 40, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wagner, N.; Wagner, K.-D. The Role of PPARs in Disease. Cells 2020, 9, 2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Torres, D.M.; Jones, F.J.; Shaw, J.C.; Williams, C.D.; Ward, J.A.; Harrison, S.A. Rosiglitazone versus rosiglitazone and metformin versus rosiglitazone and losartan in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in humans: A 12-month randomized, prospective, open- label trial. Hepatology 2011, 54, 1631–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, Y.-H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.R.; Jin, H.Y.; Rhee, E.-J.; Cho, Y.M.; Lee, B.-W. Lobeglitazone, a Novel Thiazolidinedione, Improves Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: Its Efficacy and Predictive Factors Related to Responsiveness. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ratziu, V.; Harrison, S.A.; Francque, S.; Bedossa, P.; Lehert, P.; Serfaty, L.; Romero-Gomez, M.; Boursier, J.; Abdelmalek, M.; Caldwell, S.; et al. Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator−Activated Receptor−α and −δ, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis without Fibrosis Worsening. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 1147–1159.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, L.; Liu, C.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Liu, P.; Yang, H.; Yang, J.; Chen, X.; Yao, Y. The pharmacodynamic and differential gene expression analysis of PPAR α/δ agonist GFT505 in CDAHFD-induced NASH model. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, J.; Oh, A.-R.; Lee, H.-Y.; Moon, Y.-A.; Lee, H.-J.; Cha, J.-Y. Deletion of KLF10 Leads to Stress-Induced Liver Fibrosis upon High Sucrose Feeding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, L.; Li, Q.; Chen, A.; Liu, N.; Chen, N.; Chen, X.; Zhu, L.; Xia, B.; Gong, Y.; Chen, X. KLF15-activating Twist2 ameliorated hepatic steatosis by inhibiting inflammation and improving mitochondrial dysfunction via NF-κBFGF21 or SREBP1c-FGF21 pathway. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 14254–14269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bechmann, L.; Vetter, D.; Ishida, J.; Hannivoort, R.A.; Lang, U.E.; Kocabayoglu, P.; Fiel, M.I.; Muñoz, U.; Patman, G.L.; Ge, F.; et al. Post-transcriptional activation of PPAR alpha by KLF6 in hepatic steatosis. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Biddinger, S.B.; Hernandez-Ono, A.; Rask-Madsen, C.; Haas, J.T.; Aleman, J.; Suzuki, R.; Scapa, E.F.; Agarwal, C.; Carey, M.C.; Stephanopoulos, G.; et al. Hepatic Insulin Resistance Is Sufficient to Produce Dyslipidemia and Susceptibility to Atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2008, 7, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Smith, G.; Polidori, D.C.; Yoshino, M.; Kearney, M.L.; Patterson, B.W.; Mittendorfer, B.; Klein, S. Influence of adiposity, insulin resistance, and intrahepatic triglyceride content on insulin kinetics. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 3305–3314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fawzy, M.H.; Saeed, N.M.; El-Sherbiny, D.A.; El-Demerdash, E. Eugenol modulates insulin sensitivity by upregulating insulin receptor substrate-2 in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2021, 73, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kamm, D.R.; Pyles, K.D.; Sharpe, M.C.; Healy, L.N.; Colca, J.R.; McCommis, K.S. Novel insulin sensitizer MSDC-0602K improves insulinemia and fatty liver disease in mice, alone and in combination with liraglutide. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smith, U. Pioglitazone: Mechanism of action. Int. J. Clin. Pr. Suppl. 2001, 121, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  32. Panunzi, S.; Maltese, S.; Verrastro, O.; Labbate, L.; De Gaetano, A.; Pompili, M.; Capristo, E.; Bornstein, S.R.; Mingrone, G. Pioglitazone and bariatric surgery are the most effective treatments for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A hierarchical network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2021, 23, 980–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kulkarni, S.; Huang, J.; Tycksen, E.; Cliften, P.F.; Rudnick, D.A. Diet Modifies Pioglitazone’s Influence on Hepatic PPARγ-Regulated Mitochondrial Gene Expression. PPAR Res. 2020, 2020, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. He, S.; Lu, Y.; Liu, X.; Huang, X.; Keller, E.T.; Qian, C.-N.; Zhang, J. Wnt3a: Functions and implications in cancer. Chin. J. Cancer 2015, 34, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Carotenuto, P.; Fassan, M.; Pandolfo, R.; Lampis, A.; Vicentini, C.; Cascione, L.; Paulus-Hock, V.; Boulter, L.; Guest, R.; Quagliata, L.; et al. Wnt signalling modulates transcribed-ultraconserved regions in hepatobiliary cancers. Gut 2016, 66, 1268–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Quan, H.; Li, B.; Yang, J. MicroRNA-504 functions as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma through inhibiting Frizzled-7-mediated-Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 107, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Teratani, T.; Tomita, K.; Suzuki, T.; Furuhashi, H.; Irie, R.; Nishikawa, M.; Yamamoto, J.; Hibi, T.; Miura, S.; Minamino, T.; et al. Aortic carboxypeptidase–like protein, a WNT ligand, exacerbates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhu, L.; Baker, S.S.; Shahein, A.; Choudhury, S.; Liu, W.; Bhatia, T.; Baker, R.D.; Lee, T. Upregulation of non-canonical Wnt ligands and oxidative glucose metabolism in NASH induced by methionine-choline deficient diet. Trends Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 13, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alshehri, A.S.; El-Kott, A.F.; El-Kenawy, A.E.; Khalifa, H.S.; AlRamlawy, A.M. Cadmium chloride induces non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats by stimulating miR-34a/SIRT1/FXR/p53 axis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 784, 147182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, S.; Xu, Y.; Stroup, D.; Pan, X.; Bawa, F.C.; Chen, S.; Gopoju, R.; Yin, L.; et al. Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4α Prevents the Steatosis-to-NASH Progression by Regulating p53 and Bile Acid Signaling (in mice). Hepatology 2021, 73, 2251–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Lin, Y.; Lin, S.; Li, C.; Gao, J.; Feng, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Silencing of functional p53 attenuates NAFLD by promoting HMGB1-related autophagy induction. Hepatol. Int. 2020, 14, 828–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Xu, W.; Zhang, H.; Qian, W.; Li, X.; Cheng, X. Active vitamin D supplementation alleviates initiation and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by repressing the p53 pathway. Life Sci. 2020, 241, 117086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Porteiro, B.; Fondevila, M.F.; Buque, X.; Gonzalez-Rellan, M.J.; Fernandez, U.; Mora, A.; Beiroa, D.; Senra, A.; Gallego, R.; Fernø, J.; et al. Pharmacological stimulation of p53 with low-dose doxorubicin ameliorates diet-induced nonalcoholic steatosis and steatohepatitis. Mol. Metab. 2018, 8, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nishizawa, H.; Iguchi, G.; Fukuoka, H.; Takahashi, M.; Suda, K.; Bando, H.; Matsumoto, R.; Yoshida, K.; Odake, Y.; Ogawa, W.; et al. IGF-I induces senescence of hepatic stellate cells and limits fibrosis in a p53-dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Dattaroy, D.; Seth, R.K.; Sarkar, S.; Kimono, D.; Albadrani, M.; Chandrashekaran, V.; Al Hasson, F.; Singh, U.P.; Fan, D.; Nagarkatti, M.; et al. Sparstolonin B (SsnB) attenuates liver fibrosis via a parallel conjugate pathway involving P53-P21 axis, TGF-beta signaling and focal adhesion that is TLR4 dependent. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 841, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Luo, Y.-D.; Fang, L.; Yu, H.-Q.; Zhang, J.; Lin, X.-T.; Liu, X.-Y.; Wu, D.; Li, G.-X.; Huang, D.; Zhang, Y.-J.; et al. p53 haploinsufficiency and increased mTOR signalling define a subset of aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chang, Y.; Liu, B.; Niu, H.; Wang, Z.; Xia, S.; Li, H. Value of anti-p53 antibody as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine 2020, 99, e21887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ming, Y.; Zhang, C. The role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in cancer liver metastasis. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 1845–1860. [Google Scholar]
  49. Furuta, K.; Guo, Q.; Pavelko, K.D.; Lee, J.-H.; Robertson, K.D.; Nakao, Y.; Melek, J.; Shah, V.H.; Hirsova, P.; Ibrahim, S.H. Lipid-induced endothelial vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 promotes nonalcoholic steatohepatitis pathogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e143690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carr, R.M. VCAM-1: Closing the gap between lipotoxicity and endothelial dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e147556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lefere, S.; Van De Velde, F.; Devisscher, L.; Bekaert, M.; Raevens, S.; Verhelst, X.; Van Nieuwenhove, Y.; Praet, M.; Hoorens, A.; Van Steenkiste, C.; et al. Serum vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 predicts significant liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Jin, L.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yu, W.; Li, Y.; Xin, Y.; Alsareii, S.A.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D. A synthetic peptide AWRK6 ameliorates metabolic associated fatty liver disease: Involvement of lipid and glucose homeostasis. Peptides 2021, 143, 170597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhou, R.; Lin, C.; Cheng, Y.; Zhuo, X.; Li, Q.; Xu, W.; Zhao, L.; Yang, L. Liraglutide Alleviates Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Injury in T2MD Rats via a GLP-1R Dependent AMPK Pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 600175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Van Dalem, J.; Driessen, J.H.; Burden, A.M.; Stehouwer, C.D.; Klungel, O.H.; de Vries, F.; Brouwers, M.C. Thiazolidinediones and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cohort Study. Hepatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Calo, N.; Ramadori, P.; Sobolewski, C.; Romero, Y.; Maeder, C.; Fournier, M.; Rantakari, P.; Zhang, F.-P.; Poutanen, M.; Dufour, J.-F.; et al. Stress-activated miR-21/miR-21* in hepatocytes promotes lipid and glucose metabolic disorders associated with high-fat diet consumption. Gut 2016, 65, 1871–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Loyer, X.; Paradis, V.; Hénique, C.; Vion, A.-C.; Colnot, N.; Guerin, C.L.; Devue, C.; On, S.; Scetbun, J.; Romain, M.; et al. Liver microRNA-21 is overexpressed in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and contributes to the disease in experimental models by inhibiting PPARα expression. Gut 2016, 65, 1882–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Rodrigues, P.; Afonso, M.; Simão, A.; Carvalho, C.C.; Trindade, A.; Duarte, A.; Borralho, P.M.; Machado, M.V.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Rodrigues, C.; et al. miR-21 ablation and obeticholic acid ameliorate nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, M.-X.; Gao, M.; Li, C.-Z.; Yu, C.-Z.; Yan, H.; Peng, C.; Li, Y.; Li, C.-G.; Ma, Z.-L.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Dicer1/miR-29/HMGCR axis contributes to hepatic free cholesterol accumulation in mouse non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017, 38, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ding, J.; Li, M.; Wan, X.; Jin, X.; Chen, S.; Yu, C.; Li, Y. Effect of miR-34a in regulating steatosis by targeting PPARα expression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Long, J.-K.; Dai, W.; Zheng, Y.-W.; Zhao, S.-P. miR-122 promotes hepatic lipogenesis via inhibiting the LKB1/AMPK pathway by targeting Sirt1 in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol. Med. 2019, 25, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chen, X.; Tan, X.-R.; Li, S.-J.; Zhang, X.-X. LncRNA NEAT1 promotes hepatic lipid accumulation via regulating miR-146a-5p/ROCK1 in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Life Sci. 2019, 235, 116829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, R.; Duan, X.; Liu, X.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y.; Fan, J.; Wang, B. Upregulation of miR-181a impairs lipid metabolism by targeting PPARα expression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 508, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, X.-L.; Cao, H.-X.; Wang, B.-C.; Xin, F.-Z.; Zhang, R.-N.; Zhou, D.; Yang, R.-X.; Zhao, Z.-H.; Pan, Q.; Fan, J.-G. miR-192-5p regulates lipid synthesis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through SCD-1. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 8140–8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hu, Y.; Ye, H.; Shi, L.-X. MicroRNA-205 ameliorates lipid accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through targeting NEU1. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 10072–10082. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Fernández-Tussy, P.; Fernández-Ramos, D.; Lopitz-Otsoa, F.; Simón, J.; Barbier-Torres, L.; Gomez-Santos, B.; Nuñez-Garcia, M.; Azkargorta, M.; Juan, V.G.-D.; Serrano-Macia, M.; et al. miR-873-5p targets mitochondrial GNMT-Complex II interface contributing to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol. Metab. 2019, 29, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tsai, E.; Lee, T.-P. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Including Noninvasive Biomarkers and Transient Elastography. Clin. Liver Dis. 2018, 22, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Luo, Y.; Wadhawan, S.; Greenfield, A.; Decato, B.E.; Oseini, A.M.; Collen, R.; Shevell, D.E.; Thompson, J.; Jarai, G.; Charles, E.D.; et al. SOMAscan Proteomics Identifies Serum Biomarkers Associated with Liver Fibrosis in Patients With NASH. Hepatol. Commun. 2021, 5, 760–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kozumi, K.; Kodama, T.; Murai, H.; Sakane, S.; Govaere, O.; Cockell, S.; Motooka, D.; Kakita, N.; Yamada, Y.; Kondo, Y.; et al. Transcriptomics Identify Thrombospondin-2 as a Biomarker for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Advanced Liver Fibrosis. Hepatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yoshioka, Y.; Hashimoto, E.; Yatsuji, S.; Kaneda, H.; Taniai, M.; Tokushige, K.; Shiratori, K. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and burnt-out NASH. J. Gastroenterol. 2004, 39, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Van Der Poorten, D.; Samer, C.F.; Ramezani-Moghadam, M.; Coulter, S.; Kacevska, M.; Schrijnders, D.; Wu, L.; McLeod, D.; Bugianesi, E.; Komuta, M.; et al. Hepatic fat loss in advanced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Are alterations in serum adiponectin the cause? Hepatology 2012, 57, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Catanzaro, R.; Selvaggio, F.; Sciuto, M.; Zanoli, L.; Yazdani, A.; He, F.; Marotta, F. Triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio for diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Minerva Gastroenterol. 2021, 33829728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fan, N.; Peng, L.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, L.; Song, Z.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y. Triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as a surrogate for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 2019, 18, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Cengiz, M.; Yilmaz, G.; Ozenirler, S. Serum Biglycan as a Diagnostic Marker for Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Liver Fibrosis. Clin. Lab. 2021, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ciftciler, R.; Ozenirler, S.; Yucel, A.A.; Cengiz, M.; Erkan, G.; Buyukdemirci, E.; Sönmez, C.; Esendaglı, G.Y. The importance of serum biglycan levels as a fibrosis marker in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2016, 31, e22109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yip, T.C.-F.; Ma, A.J.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Tse, Y.-K.; Chan, H.L.-Y.; Yuen, P.-C.; Wong, G.L.-H. Laboratory parameter-based machine learning model for excluding non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the general population. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 46, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, D.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, C.-H.; Yang, J.I.; Kim, W.; Kim, Y.J.; Yoon, J.-H.; Cho, S.-H.; Sung, M.-W.; et al. Hepatic steatosis index: A simple screening tool reflecting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig. Liver Dis. 2010, 42, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Harrison, S.A.; Oliver, D.; Arnold, H.L.; Gogia, S.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A. Development and validation of a simple NAFLD clinical scoring system for identifying patients without advanced disease. Gut 2008, 57, 1441–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Raszeja-Wyszomirska, J.; Szymanik, B.; Ławniczak, M.; Kajor, M.; Chwist, A.; Milkiewicz, P.; Hartleb, M. Validation of the BARD scoring system in Polish patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). BMC Gastroenterol. 2010, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vallet-Pichard, A.; Mallet, V.; Nalpas, B.; Verkarre, V.; Nalpas, A.; Dhalluin-Venier, V.; Fontaine, H.; Pol, S. FIB-4: An inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology 2007, 46, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. McPherson, S.; Stewart, S.F.; Henderson, E.; Burt, A.; Day, C.P. Simple non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2010, 59, 1265–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kim, B.K.; Kim, D.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Chon, C.Y.; Kim, J.K.; Paik, Y.H.; Lee, K.S.; Park, Y.N.; Han, K.-H. Validation of FIB-4 and comparison with other simple noninvasive indices for predicting liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in hepatitis B virus-infected patients. Liver Int. 2010, 30, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Angulo, P.; Hui, J.M.; Marchesini, G.; Bugianesi, E.; George, J.; Farrell, G.C.; Enders, F.; Saksena, S.; Burt, A.D.; Bida, J.P.; et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: A noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007, 45, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bedogni, G.; Bellentani, S.; Miglioli, L.; Masutti, F.; Passalacqua, M.; Castiglione, A.; Tiribelli, C. The Fatty Liver Index: A simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Castellana, M.; Donghia, R.; Guerra, V.; Procino, F.; Lampignano, L.; Castellana, F.; Zupo, R.; Sardone, R.; De Pergola, G.; Romanelli, F.; et al. Performance of Fatty Liver Index in Identifying Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Population Studies. A Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, J.; Li, H.; Xu, Z.; Ran, L.; Kong, L.-Q. Population-specific cut-off points of fatty liver index for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. J. Hepatol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kühn, T.; Nonnenmacher, T.; Sookthai, D.; Schübel, R.; Pacheco, D.A.Q.; Von Stackelberg, O.; Graf, M.E.; Johnson, T.; Schlett, C.; Kirsten, R.; et al. Anthropometric and blood parameters for the prediction of NAFLD among overweight and obese adults. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018, 18, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Ristic-Medic, D.; Kovacic, M.; Takic, M.; Arsic, A.; Petrovic, S.; Paunovic, M.; Jovicic, M.; Vucic, V. Calorie-Restricted Mediterranean and Low-Fat Diets Affect Fatty Acid Status in Individuals with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nutrients 2020, 13, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Holmer, M.; Lindqvist, C.; Petersson, S.; Moshtaghi-Svensson, J.; Tillander, V.; Brismar, T.B.; Hagström, H.; Stål, P. Treatment of NAFLD with intermittent calorie restriction or low-carb high-fat diet—A randomised controlled trial. JHEP Rep. 2021, 3, 100256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ghetti, F.D.F.; De Oliveira, D.G.; De Oliveira, J.M.; Ferreira, L.E.V.V.D.C.; Cesar, D.E.; Moreira, A.P.B. Effects of Dietary Intervention on Gut Microbiota and Metabolic-Nutritional Profile of Outpatients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2019, 28, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Razavi Zade, M.; Telkabadi, M.H.; Bahmani, F.; Salehi, B.; Farshbaf, S.; Asemi, Z. The effects of DASH diet on weight loss and metabolic status in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized clinical trial. Liver Int. 2016, 36, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Song, E.; Kim, J.A.; Roh, E.; Yu, J.H.; Kim, N.H.; Yoo, H.J.; Seo, J.A.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, N.H.; Baik, S.H.; et al. Long Working Hours and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey VII. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 647459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kobayashi, T.; Suzuki, E.; Takao, S.; Doi, H. Long working hours and metabolic syndrome among Japanese men: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Virtanen, M.; Heikkila, K.; Jokela, M.; Ferrie, J.E.; Batty, G.; Vahtera, J.; Kivimaki, M. Long Working Hours and Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 176, 586–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Kivimaki, M.; Jokela, M.; Nyberg, S.T.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Fransson, E.I.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Casini, A.; et al. Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603 838 individuals. Lancet 2015, 386, 1739–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. McCambridge, J.; Witton, J.; Elbourne, D.R. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014, 67, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Glass, O.; Filozof, C.; Noureddin, M.; Berner-Hansen, M.; Schabel, E.; Omokaro, S.O.; Schattenberg, J.M.; Barradas, K.; Miller, V.; Francque, S.; et al. Standardisation of diet and exercise in clinical trials of NAFLD-NASH: Recommendations from the Liver Forum. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 680–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Miura, I.; Komine, S.; Okada, K.; Wada, S.; Warabi, E.; Uchida, F.; Oh, S.; Suzuki, H.; Mizokami, Y.; Shoda, J. Prevention of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by long-term exercise via the induction of phenotypic changes in Kupffer cells of hyperphagic obese mice. Physiol. Rep. 2021, 9, e14859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kasper, P.; Breuer, S.; Hoffmann, T.; Vohlen, C.; Janoschek, R.; Schmitz, L.; Appel, S.; Fink, G.; Hünseler, C.; Quaas, A.; et al. Maternal Exercise Mediates Hepatic Metabolic Programming via Activation of AMPK-PGC1α Axis in the Offspring of Obese Mothers. Cells 2021, 10, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Battista, F.; Ermolao, A.; van Baak, M.A.; Beaulieu, K.; Blundell, J.E.; Busetto, L.; Carraça, E.V.; Encantado, J.; Dicker, D.; Farpour-Lambert, N.; et al. Effect of exercise on cardiometabolic health of adults with overweight or obesity: Focus on blood pressure, insulin resistance, and intrahepatic fat—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22, e13269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cornejo-Pareja, I.; Clemente-Postigo, M.; Tinahones, F.J. Metabolic and Endocrine Consequences of Bariatric Surgery. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Skuratovskaia, D.; Vulf, M.; Chasovskikh, N.; Komar, A.; Kirienkova, E.; Shunkin, E.; Zatolokin, P.; Litvinova, L. The Links of Ghrelin to Incretins, Insulin, Glucagon, and Leptin after Bariatric Surgery. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 612501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Syn, N.L.; Cummings, D.E.; Wang, L.Z.; Lin, D.J.; Zhao, J.J.; Loh, M.; Koh, Z.J.; Chew, C.A.; Loo, Y.E.; Tai, B.C.; et al. Association of metabolic–bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: A one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174,772 participants. Lancet 2021, 397, 1830–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cherla, D.V.; Rodriguez, N.A.; Vangoitsenhoven, R.; Singh, T.; Mehta, N.; McCullough, A.J.; Brethauer, S.A.; Schauer, P.R.; Aminian, A. Impact of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Surg. Endosc. 2019, 34, 2266–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kalinowski, P.; Paluszkiewicz, R.; Ziarkiewicz-Wróblewska, B.; Wróblewski, T.; Remiszewski, P.; Grodzicki, M.; Krawczyk, M. Liver Function in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Randomized to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus Sleeve Gastrectomy. Ann. Surg. 2017, 266, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wölnerhanssen, B.K.; Peterli, R.; Hurme, S.; Bueter, M.; Helmiö, M.; Juuti, A.; Meyer-Gerspach, A.C.; Slawik, M.; Peromaa-Haavisto, P.; Nuutila, P.; et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of merged data from two randomized clinical trials (SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS). BJS 2021, 108, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pajecki, D.; Dantas, A.C.B.; Tustumi, F.; Kanaji, A.L.; de Cleva, R.; Santo, M.A. Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Elderly: 1-Year Preliminary Outcomes in a Randomized Trial (BASE Trial). Obes. Surg. 2021, 31, 2359–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Iwaki, M.; Kessoku, T.; Ozaki, A.; Kasai, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Nogami, A.; Honda, Y.; Ogawa, Y.; Imajo, K.; Yoneda, M.; et al. Gut microbiota composition associated with hepatic fibrosis in non-obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lee, G.; You, H.J.; Bajaj, J.S.; Joo, S.K.; Yu, J.; Park, S.; Kang, H.; Park, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, D.H.; et al. Distinct signatures of gut microbiome and metabolites associated with significant fibrosis in non-obese NAFLD. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, C.; Yang, M.; Ericsson, A.C. The Potential Gut Microbiota-Mediated Treatment Options for Liver Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 524205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Pan, X.; Wen, S.W.; Kaminga, A.C.; Liu, A. Gut metabolites and inflammation factors in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Craven, L.; Rahman, A.; Parvathy, S.N.; Beaton, M.; Silverman, J.; Qumosani, K.; Hramiak, I.; Hegele, R.; Joy, T.; Meddings, J.; et al. Allogenic Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Improves Abnormal Small Intestinal Permeability: A Randomized Control Trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Scorletti, E.; Afolabi, P.R.; Miles, E.A.; Smith, D.E.; Almehmadi, A.; AlShathry, A.; Childs, C.E.; Del Fabbro, S.; Bilson, J.; Moyses, H.E.; et al. Synbiotics Alter Fecal Microbiomes, But Not Liver Fat or Fibrosis, in a Randomized Trial of Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1597–1610.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Campisciano, G.; Palmisano, S.; Cason, C.; Giuricin, M.; Silvestri, M.; Guerra, M.; Macor, D.; De Manzini, N.; Crocé, L.; Comar, M. Gut microbiota characterisation in obese patients before and after bariatric surgery. Benef. Microbes 2018, 9, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, J.V.; Ashrafian, H.; Sarafian, M.; Homola, D.; Rushton, L.; Barker, G.; Cabrera, P.M.; Lewis, M.R.; Darzi, A.; Lin, E.; et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-induced bacterial perturbation contributes to altered host-bacterial co-metabolic phenotype. Microbiome 2021, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Loosen, S.H.; Demir, M.; Kunstein, A.; Jördens, M.; Qvarskhava, N.; Luedde, M.; Luedde, T.; Roderburg, C.; Kostev, K. Variables associated with increased incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2021, 9, e002243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ganjooei, N.A.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Nematy, M.; Jangjoo, A.; Goshayeshi, L.; Khadem-Rezaiyan, M.; Reiner, Ž.; Alidadi, M.; Markin, A.M.; Sahebkar, A. The Role of Lipid Profile as an Independent Predictor of Non-alcoholic Steatosis and Steatohepatitis in Morbidly Obese Patients. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 682352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kumar, D.P.; Caffrey, R.; Marioneaux, J.; Santhekadur, P.K.; Bhat, M.; Alonso, C.; Koduru, S.V.; Philip, B.; Jain, M.R.; Giri, S.R.; et al. The PPAR α/γ Agonist Saroglitazar Improves Insulin Resistance and Steatohepatitis in a Diet Induced Animal Model of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gawrieh, S.; Noureddin, M.; Loo, N.; Mohseni, R.; Awasty, V.; Cusi, K.; Kowdley, K.V.; Lai, M.; Schiff, E.; Parmar, D.; et al. Saroglitazar, a PPAR-α/γ Agonist, for Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Phase 2 Trial. Hepatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Schmitt, J.; Kong, B.; Stieger, B.; Tschopp, O.; Schultze, S.M.; Rau, M.; Weber, A.; Mullhaupt, B.; Guo, G.L.; Geier, A. Protective effects of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) on hepatic lipid accumulation are mediated by hepatic FXR and independent of intestinal FGF15 signal. Liver Int. 2015, 35, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Liu, M.; Zhang, G.; Wu, S.; Song, M.; Wang, J.; Cai, W.; Mi, S.; Liu, C. Schaftoside alleviates HFD-induced hepatic lipid accumulation in mice via upregulating farnesoid X receptor. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 255, 112776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Amano, Y.; Shimada, M.; Miura, S.; Adachi, R.; Tozawa, R. Effects of a farnesoid X receptor antagonist on hepatic lipid metabolism in primates. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 723, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ma, K.; Saha, P.K.; Chan, L.; Moore, D.D. Farnesoid X receptor is essential for normal glucose homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Patel, K.; Harrison, S.A.; Elkashab, M.; Trotter, J.F.; Herring, R.; Rojter, S.; Kayali, Z.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Greenbloom, S.; Jayakumar, S.; et al. Cilofexor, a Nonsteroidal FXR Agonist, in Non-Cirrhotic Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial. Hepatology 2020, 72, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, E.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, H. Impact of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Complicated by Diabetes Mellitus. Hepatol. Commun. 2021, 5, 736–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wong, C.; Lee, M.H.; Yaow, C.Y.L.; Chin, Y.H.; Goh, X.L.; Ng, C.H.; Lim, A.Y.L.; Muthiah, M.D.; Khoo, C.M. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 609110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sivitz, W.I.; Phillips, L.S.; Wexler, D.J.; Fortmann, S.P.; Camp, A.W.; Tiktin, M.; Perez, M.; Craig, J.; Hollander, P.A.; Cherrington, A.; et al. Optimization of Metformin in the GRADE Cohort: Effect on Glycemia and Body Weight. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Gillani, S.W.; Ghayedi, N.; Roosta, P.; Seddigh, P.; Nasiri, O. Effect of Metformin on Lipid Profiles of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2021, 13, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Lamos, E.M.; Kristan, M.; Siamashvili, M.; Davis, S.N. Effects of anti-diabetic treatments in type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Amanullah, I.; Khan, Y.H.; Anwar, I.; Gulzar, A.; Mallhi, T.H.; Raja, A.A. Effect of vitamin E in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Postgrad. Med. J. 2019, 95, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sebastiani, G.; Saeed, S.; Lebouche, B.; De Pokomandy, A.; Szabo, J.; Haraoui, L.-P.; Routy, J.-P.; Wong, P.; Deschenes, M.; Ghali, P.; et al. Vitamin E is an effective treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in HIV mono-infected patients. AIDS 2020, 34, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Abenavoli, L.; Larussa, T.; Corea, A.; Procopio, A.; Boccuto, L.; Dallio, M.; Federico, A.; Luzza, F. Dietary Polyphenolsand Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Salehi-Sahlabadi, A.; Teymoori, F.; Jabbari, M.; Momeni, A.; Mokari-Yamchi, A.; Sohouli, M.; Hekmatdoost, A. Dietary polyphenols and the odds of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A case-control study. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 41, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Fujinaga, Y.; Kawaratani, H.; Kaya, D.; Tsuji, Y.; Ozutsumi, T.; Furukawa, M.; Kitagawa, K.; Sato, S.; Nishimura, N.; Sawada, Y.; et al. Effective Combination Therapy of Angiotensin-II Receptor Blocker and Rifaximin for Hepatic Fibrosis in Rat Model of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gangarapu, V.; Ince, A.T.; Baysal, B.; Kayar, Y.; Kılıç, U.; Gök, Ö.; Uysal, Ö.; Şenturk, H. Efficacy of rifaximin on circulating endotoxins and cytokines in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 27, 840–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Loomba, R.; Lawitz, E.; Mantry, P.S.; Jayakumar, S.; Caldwell, S.H.; Arnold, H.; Diehl, A.M.; Djedjos, C.S.; Han, L.; Myers, R.P.; et al. The ASK1 inhibitor selonsertib in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomized, phase 2 trial. Hepatology 2018, 67, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Harrison, S.A.; Wong, V.; Okanoue, T.; Bzowej, N.; Vuppalanchi, R.; Younes, Z.; Kohli, A.; Sarin, S.; Caldwell, S.H.; Alkhouri, N.; et al. Selonsertib for patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis due to NASH: Results from randomized phase III STELLAR trials. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Loomba, R.; Noureddin, M.; Kowdley, K.V.; Kohli, A.; Sheikh, A.; Neff, G.; Bhandari, B.R.; Gunn, N.; Caldwell, S.H.; Goodman, Z.; et al. Combination Therapies Including Cilofexor and Firsocostat for Bridging Fibrosis and Cirrhosis Attributable to NASH. Hepatology 2021, 73, 625–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Geng, Y.; Villanueva, A.H.; Oun, A.; Buist-Homan, M.; Blokzijl, H.; Faber, K.N.; Dolga, A.; Moshage, H. Protective effect of metformin against palmitate-induced hepatic cell death. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wells, R.G. Cellular Sources of Extracellular Matrix in Hepatic Fibrosis. Clin. Liver Dis. 2008, 12, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Kisseleva, T. The origin of fibrogenic myofibroblasts in fibrotic liver. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Liu, B.; Deng, X.; Jiang, Q.; Li, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, N.; Xin, S.; Xu, K. Scoparone alleviates inflammation, apoptosis and fibrosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by suppressing the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 75, 105797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Yang, M.; Zhang, C.-Y. G protein-coupled receptors as potential targets for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease treatment. World J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 27, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Chen, C.-Y.; Li, Y.; Zeng, N.; He, L.; Zhang, X.; Tu, T.; Tang, Q.; Alba, M.; Mir, S.; Stiles, E.X.; et al. Inhibition of Estrogen-Related Receptor α Blocks Liver Steatosis and Steatohepatitis and Attenuates Triglyceride Biosynthesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2021, 191, 1240–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Yang, M.; Zhang, C. The role of bone morphogenetic proteins in liver fibrosis. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Open Access 2021, 12, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sun, N.; Shen, C.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Yu, Y.; Yang, X.; Yang, C.; Zhong, C.; Gao, Z.; Miao, W.; et al. Hepatic Krüppel-like factor 16 (KLF16) targets PPARα to improve steatohepatitis and insulin resistance. Gut 2020, 10, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Newsome, P.N.; Buchholtz, K.; Cusi, K.; Linder, M.; Okanoue, T.; Ratziu, V.; Sanyal, A.J.; Sejling, A.-S.; Harrison, S.A. A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Harrison, S.A.; Alkhouri, N.; Davison, B.A.; Sanyal, A.; Edwards, C.; Colca, J.R.; Lee, B.H.; Loomba, R.; Cusi, K.; Kolterman, O.; et al. Insulin sensitizer MSDC-0602K in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Palmer, M.; Jennings, L.; Silberg, D.G.; Bliss, C.; Martin, P. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of volixibat in overweight and obese but otherwise healthy adults: Implications for treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018, 19, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Trauner, M.; Gulamhusein, A.; Hameed, B.; Caldwell, S.; Shiffman, M.L.; Landis, C.; Eksteen, B.; Agarwal, K.; Muir, A.; Rushbrook, S.; et al. The Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist Cilofexor (GS-9674) Improves Markers of Cholestasis and Liver Injury in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Hepatology 2019, 70, 788–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Hoofnagle, J.H.; Van Natta, M.L.; Kleiner, D.; Clark, J.M.; Kowdley, K.V.; Loomba, R.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Sanyal, A.J.; Tonascia, J.; the Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN). Vitamin E and changes in serum alanine aminotransferase levels in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 38, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Podszun, M.C.; Alawad, A.S.; Lingala, S.; Morris, N.; Huang, W.-C.A.; Yang, S.; Schoenfeld, M.; Rolt, A.; Ouwerkerk, R.; Valdez, K.; et al. Vitamin E treatment in NAFLD patients demonstrates that oxidative stress drives steatosis through upregulation of de-novo lipogenesis. Redox Biol. 2020, 37, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Lawitz, E.J.; Coste, A.; Poordad, F.; Alkhouri, N.; Loo, N.; McColgan, B.J.; Tarrant, J.M.; Nguyen, T.; Han, L.; Chung, C.; et al. Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase Inhibitor GS-0976 for 12 Weeks Reduces Hepatic De Novo Lipogenesis and Steatosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 16, 1983–1991.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Loomba, R.; Kayali, Z.; Noureddin, M.; Ruane, P.; Lawitz, E.J.; Bennett, M.; Wang, L.; Harting, E.; Tarrant, J.M.; McColgan, B.J.; et al. GS-0976 Reduces Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis Markers in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1463–1473.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Sanyal, A.; Charles, E.D.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Loomba, R.; Harrison, S.A.; Abdelmalek, M.; Lawitz, E.J.; Halegoua-DeMarzio, D.; Kundu, S.; Noviello, S.; et al. Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), a PEGylated fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet 2018, 392, 2705–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Mudaliar, S.; Henry, R.R.; Sanyal, A.J.; Morrow, L.; Marschall, H.-U.; Kipnes, M.; Adorini, L.; Sciacca, C.I.; Clopton, P.; Castelloe, E.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of the Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist Obeticholic Acid in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2013, 145, 574–582.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Vos, M.B.; Jin, R.; Konomi, J.V.; Cleeton, R.; Cruz, J.; Karpen, S.; Rodriguez, D.S.; Frediani, J.K.; McCracken, C.; Welsh, J. A randomized, controlled, crossover pilot study of losartan for pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018, 4, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Navarro, V.J.; Belle, S.H.; D’Amato, M.; Adfhal, N.; Brunt, E.M.; Fried, M.W.; Reddy, K.R.; Wahed, A.S.; Harrison, S. Silymarin in NASH and C Hepatitis (SyNCH) Study Group Silymarin in non-cirrhotics with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Loomba, R.; Lutchman, G.; Kleiner, D.; Ricks, M.; Feld, J.J.; Borg, B.B.; Modi, A.; Nagabhyru, P.; Sumner, A.E.; Liang, T.J.; et al. Clinical trial: Pilot study of metformin for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 29, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ratziu, V.; Sanyal, A.; Harrison, S.A.; Wong, V.W.; Francque, S.; Goodman, Z.; Aithal, G.; Kowdley, K.V.; Seyedkazemi, S.; Fischer, L.; et al. Cenicriviroc Treatment for Adults with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis: Final Analysis of the Phase 2b CENTAUR Study. Hepatology 2020, 72, 892–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. VanWagner, L.; Koppe, S.W.; Brunt, E.M.; Gottstein, J.; Gardikiotes, K.; Green, R.M.; Rinella, M.E. Pentoxifylline for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Hepatol. 2011, 10, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Schwimmer, J.; Ugalde-Nicalo, P.; Welsh, J.A.; Angeles, J.E.; Cordero, M.; Harlow, K.E.; Alazraki, A.; Durelle, J.; Knight-Scott, J.; Newton, K.P.; et al. Effect of a Low Free Sugar Diet vs Usual Diet on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adolescent Boys. JAMA 2019, 321, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Shiffman, M.; Freilich, B.; Vuppalanchi, R.; Watt, K.; Chan, J.L.; Spada, A.; Hagerty, D.T.; Schiff, E. Randomised clinical trial: Emricasan versus placebo significantly decreases ALT and caspase 3/7 activation in subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 49, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The important molecules and signaling pathways are involved in the development of NAFLD and the progression of NASH. Abbreviations: ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; Acox1, acyl-CoA oxidase 1; AKT, protein kinase B; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; Fabp4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; FGF21, fibroblast growth factor 21; KLF15, Krüppel-like factors 15; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; NF-κB, nuclear factor (NF)-κB; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TWIST2, twist-related protein 2; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.
Figure 1. The important molecules and signaling pathways are involved in the development of NAFLD and the progression of NASH. Abbreviations: ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; Acox1, acyl-CoA oxidase 1; AKT, protein kinase B; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; Fabp4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; FGF21, fibroblast growth factor 21; KLF15, Krüppel-like factors 15; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; NF-κB, nuclear factor (NF)-κB; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TWIST2, twist-related protein 2; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.
Ijms 22 07571 g001
Figure 2. Treatment options for NAFLD or NASH. The currently effective treatment options for NAFLD/NASH include lifestyle modification, bariatric surgery, and medicines. In addition, modification of gut microbiota by prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics shows promising effects.
Figure 2. Treatment options for NAFLD or NASH. The currently effective treatment options for NAFLD/NASH include lifestyle modification, bariatric surgery, and medicines. In addition, modification of gut microbiota by prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics shows promising effects.
Ijms 22 07571 g002
Table 1. The miRNAs-mediated function and therapy in NAFLD.
Table 1. The miRNAs-mediated function and therapy in NAFLD.
miRNAsTargetFunctionReference
miR-21PPARαIn a diet-induced NASH model, miR-21 ablation ameliorated the progression of hepatic steatosis, apoptosis, and fibrosis via inhibiting the expression of PPARα.[57]
miR-29aHMGCROverexpression of miR-29a in steatosis hepatic SMMC-7721 cells significantly reduced the accumulation of free cholesterol and the expression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), a rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis in the liver. Furthermore, the expression of miR-29a was inversely correlated with HMGCR expression in MCD-fed mice and two steatosis hepatic cell models (SMMC-7721 and HL-7702 cells), indicating that miR-29a can be utilized as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of NAFLD.[58]
miR-34aPPARαInhibition of miR-34a expression suppressed lipid accumulation and improved the degree of steatosis, ameliorating the development of NAFLD by targeting PPARα.[59]
miR-122Sirt1Knockdown of miR-122 effectively decreased excessive lipid production and suppressed the expression of lipogenic genes in FFA-treated HepG2 and Huh-7 cells via upregulating Sirt1 by binding to its 3’-untranslated region (UTR). In addition, miR-122 knockdown activated the liver Kinase B1 (LKB1)/AMPK signaling pathway.[60]
miR-146a-5pROCK1It has been reported that nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) was significantly upregulated in the NAFLD model. NEAT1 regulates the expression of miR-146a-5p that targets ROCK1 (rho-associated, coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 1), which further affects the AMPK/SREBP pathway.[61]
miR-181aPPARαInhibition of miR-181a expression resulted in the upregulation of PPARα signaling pathway and inhibited palmitic acid (PA)-induced lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. The upregulation of miR-181a showed a reverse effect in hepatocyte lipid accumulation. Meanwhile, upregulating PPARα abrogated miR-181a mimics-induced lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. This study suggests that the downregulation of miR-181a may improve lipid metabolism in NAFLD.[62]
miR-192-5pSCD-1In PA-treated Huh7 cells, overexpression of miR-192-5p significantly reduced lipid accumulation, which was abrogated by stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1) siRNA. Transfection of miR-192-5p mimic and inhibitor in Huh7 cells dramatically repressed and promoted SCD-1 protein expression, respectively.[63]
miR-205NEU1MiR-205 expression was inversely correlated with neuraminidase 1 (NEU1) expression in both HFD-fed mice and oleic acid (OA)-treated HepG2 and PH cells. In HFD-fed mice, overexpression of miR-205 resulted in a decrease in body weight, liver weight and triglyceride, and lipid accumulation. The in vitro study indicated that overexpression of miR-205 ameliorated lipid accumulation in OA-induced HepG2 and PH cells by targeting NEU1, identified by the TargetScan analysis and Luciferase assay. Knockdown of NEU1 reduced lipid accumulation in vivo, suggesting that miR-205 might be a therapeutic target for NAFLD.[64]
miR-873-5pGNMTIn hepatocytes of a preclinical murine NASH model, miR-873-5p controlled the enzyme glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) expression, which mediates mitochondrial functionality. Upregulation of miR-873-5p was also shown in the liver of NAFLD/NASH patients, correlating with hepatic GNMT depletion. Treatment with anti-miR-873-5p resolved lipid accumulation, inflammation, and fibrosis by enhancing fatty acid β-oxidation in the mitochondria, suggesting that miR-873-5p inhibitor emerges as a potential treatment for NASH.[65]
Table 2. Serum markers and score system for NAFLD and NASH diagnosis.
Table 2. Serum markers and score system for NAFLD and NASH diagnosis.
Score/MarkerTest ComponentsDiagnosisReferences
TG/HDL-C ratioTriglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C)Presence of NAFLD[71,72]
Biglycan (BGN)The cutoff value of 189.58 pg/mL of serum BGN with the best sensitivity (93.55%) and specificity (87.18%)Fibrosis stage of NASH[73,74]
NAFLD ridge scoreALT, HDL-C, TG, haemoglobin A1c, white blood cell count, the presence of hypertensionPresence of NAFLD[75]
Hepatic steatosis index (HSI)8× (ALT/AST ratio) + BMI (+2, if female; +2, if diabetes mellitus)Presence of NAFLD[76]
BARD scoreBMI, AST/ALT ratio, diabetes mellitus Presence of NAFLD[77,78]
FIB-4 scoreAge, platelet count, ALT, AST Presence of NAFLD or fibrosis stage of NASH [79,80,81]
NAFLD fibrosis scoreAge, hyperglycemia, body mass index, platelet count, albumin, and AST/ALT ratioPresence of fibrosis in NAFLD[80,82]
Fatty Liver IndexBMI, waist circumference, triglycerides, and γ-glutamyltransferasePresence of NAFLD[83,84,85]
AUROCWaist circumference, ALT, HbA1c, and HOMA-IRPresence of NAFLD[86]
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BMI, body mass index; FIB-4, fibrosis-4 score; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; TG, triglyceride.
Table 3. The completed clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH treatment.
Table 3. The completed clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH treatment.
Liver DiseaseTreatmentTargetTrialsReferences
NAFLD
NASH
MSDC-0602KTwo higher doses of MSDC-0602K (125 mg and 250 mg), a second-generation thiazolidinedione (TZD) significantly reduced the levels of glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin, liver enzymes, and NAS compared to placebo.NCT02784444[147]
NAFLDVolixibatTreatment with volixibat for 12 days, a selective inhibitor of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter, can inhibit bile acid reabsorption in overweight and obese adults.NCT02287779[148]
NASHCilofexor (GS-9674)Therapy with Cilofexor for 24 weeks, a nonsteroidal agonist of FXR, was well-tolerated and provided significant reductions in hepatic steatosis, liver biochemistry, and serum bile acids in patients with NASH. NCT02854605[149]
NASHVitamin EVitamin E can decrease serum ALT levels and NAS score, but not liver fibrosis.NCT00063622[150]
NAFLDVitamin ETreatment with vitamin E (α-tocopherol, αT) improved liver injury and steatosis. NCT01792115[151]
NASHFirsocostat (GS-0976)Treatment with GS-0976 for 12 weeks dramatically decreased serum level of ALT, liver de novo lipogenesis (DNL), steatosis, and stiffness.NCT02856555[152,153]
NASHPegbelfermin (BMS-986036)Administration of Pegbelfermin for 16 weeks, a PEGylated human fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) analogue, was generally well tolerated and significantly decreased liver fat.NCT02413372[154]
NAFLDObeticholic acid (OCA)Treatment with FXR agonist OCA for 6 weeks improved insulin sensitivity and decreased markers of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with T2DM and NAFLD.NCT00501592[155]
NASHLosartanTreatment with losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, improvement in alanine ALT, AST, and HOMA-IR compared to the placebo. NCT01913470[156]
NASHSilymarinTreatment with silymarin, an extract of milk thistle, did not significantly improve NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) and liver fibrosis.NCT00680407[157]
NASHMetforminForty-eight weeks of metformin (2000 mg/day) therapy improved NASH activity index and ALT levels, and reduced bodyweight.NCT00063232[158]
NASHCenicriviroc (CVC)Therapy with Cenicriviroc, CCR2 and CCR5 dual antagonist, showed an antifibrotic effect without impacting steatohepatitis at year 1 in responders, which was maintained in year 2 with greater effect in advanced fibrosis.NCT02217475[159]
NASHPentoxifylline (PTX)Pentoxifylline, a competitive nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor, can improve liver steatosis and AST, ALT in patients with NASH compared to the baseline.NCT00267670[160]
NAFLDLow free sugar dietEight weeks of use of a low-free sugar diet in adolescent boys with NAFLD resulted in significant improvement in hepatic steatosis compared to the usual diet.NCT02513121[161]
NAFLDSynbioticsAdministration of a synbiotic combination of probiotic and prebiotic for one year changed gut microbiota but did not reduce liver fat content or markers of liver fibrosis.NCT01680640[112]
NAFLDEmricasanTreatment with Emricasan, a pan-caspase inhibitor, caused a reduction of ALT and cleaved cytokeratin-18, full-length cytokeratin-18, and caspase 3/7 in patients with NAFLD at day 7 and day 28 post-treatment.NCT02077374[162]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Yang, M. Current Options and Future Directions for NAFLD and NASH Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147571

AMA Style

Zhang C, Yang M. Current Options and Future Directions for NAFLD and NASH Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147571

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Chunye, and Ming Yang. 2021. "Current Options and Future Directions for NAFLD and NASH Treatment" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147571

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop