Next Article in Journal
Identification of Isoform-Selective Ligands for the Middle Domain of Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90)
Next Article in Special Issue
Immunohistochemical Study on the Expression of G-CSF, G-CSFR, VEGF, VEGFR-1, Foxp3 in First Trimester Trophoblast of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Pregnancies Treated with G-CSF and Controls
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Assessment of Mixture Toxicity of Three Ionic Liquids on Acetylcholinesterase Using a Progressive Approach from 1D Point, 2D Curve, to 3D Surface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beneficial and Deleterious Effects of Female Sex Hormones, Oral Contraceptives, and Phytoestrogens by Immunomodulation on the Liver
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms20215332
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

by
Carlo Ticconi
1,*,
Adalgisa Pietropolli
1,
Nicoletta Di Simone
2,3,
Emilio Piccione
1 and
Asgerally Fazleabas
4
1
Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
2
U.O.C. di Ostetricia e Patologia Ostetrica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Laego A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome Italy
3
Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(21), 5332; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215332
Submission received: 17 September 2019 / Revised: 23 October 2019 / Accepted: 24 October 2019 / Published: 26 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reproductive Immunology: Cellular and Molecular Biology)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) represents an unresolved problem for contemporary gynecology and obstetrics. In fact, it is not only a relevant complication of pregnancy, but is also a significant reproductive disorder affecting around 5% of couples desiring a child. The current knowledge on RPL is largely incomplete, since nearly 50% of RPL cases are still classified as unexplained. Emerging evidence indicates that the endometrium is a key tissue involved in the correct immunologic dialogue between the mother and the conceptus, which is a condition essential for the proper establishment and maintenance of a successful pregnancy. The immunologic events occurring at the maternal–fetal interface within the endometrium in early pregnancy are extremely complex and involve a large array of immune cells and molecules with immunoregulatory properties. A growing body of experimental studies suggests that endometrial immune dysregulation could be responsible for several, if not many, cases of RPL of unknown origin. The present article reviews the major immunologic pathways, cells, and molecular determinants involved in the endometrial dysfunction observed with specific application to RPL.

1. Introduction

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is the loss of two or more pregnancies before 24 weeks of gestation, according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [1]. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine defines RPL as two or more failed clinical pregnancies [2]. RPL is a challenge for the clinical and scientific community. In fact, in only around 50% of RPL cases can defined causes/risk factors can be found, including advanced maternal age, genetic abnormalities, selected maternal autoantibodies, endocrine dysfunctions, and uterine abnormalities [3]. The remaining RPL cases currently are unexplained (uRPL) [3,4].
It is believed that a significant, although not exactly quantified, proportion of RPL is associated with immune etiologies [5] and that in these cases the pregnancy losses can occur through persistent disturbances in several immune pathways [6]. In this context, a relevant role could be played by the endometrium.
The endometrium has a crucial role in reproduction. It is the maternal tissue that comes into direct contact with the embryo and allows for its proper implantation, survival, and development, processes in which it actively participates. Extensive investigation has been carried out in the last decades to clarify the biomolecular mechanisms which make the endometrium receptive to the embryo, as well as the specific cell types and the cellular pathways involved in endometrial receptivity. However, our knowledge on these mechanisms is still largely incomplete. The currently available information indicates that the endometrium is a unique tissue in which a series of events—collectively called decidualization—occur in order to ensure, in a dynamic fashion, the correct environment for the developing conceptus. Emerging evidence indicates that a pivotal role in endometrial remodeling and maternal tolerance towards the embryo is played by several cells of the innate and adaptive immune system, which have or acquire specific characteristics when they are in or reach the endometrium, together with a growing number of immunoregulatory molecules.
The experimental and clinical evidence also suggests that derangements occurring in the endometrial immune environment can be involved in several important reproductive dysfunctions, such as recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) of otherwise unexplained etiology. This review summarizes the major contributions of the immune system in the physiology of the endometrial function and the current knowledge on the major known alterations of the endometrial immune system with specific application to RPL in women.

2. Physiological Endometrial Function and the Immune System

2.1. Endometrial Remodeling and Decidualization

The endometrium is the maternal tissue that comes into direct contact with the embryo, which is immunologically different from the mother, being usually considered as a semi allograft, or even as a complete allograft in the case of oocyte donation [7]. The major function of the endometrium is to create and ensure an optimal endocrine/paracrine, immune, and molecular environment that allows for proper apposition, attachment, implantation, invasion and development, and full maturation of the embryo. To accomplish this mission, the endometrium needs to develop a series of unique and striking adaptive changes collectively termed decidualization, resulting in profound morphological and functional reprogramming of the endometrial stromal cells that differentiate into highly specialized cells with secretory capabilities. Among the eutherian—placental mammals—these changes are particularly significant in species with an invasive type of placenta, specifically in humans who have the most invasive type of placentation. In fact, the extent of decidualization is proportional to the degree of invasiveness of the embryo [8]. While endometrial transformation in most animal species occurs in response to the presence of the embryo, in a few species—including humans—it takes place well in advance of the presence of the embryo and, therefore, is—at least initially—under exclusive maternal hormonal control. If conception does not occur, in response to falling circulating levels of progesterone the decidualized endometrium in these species is shed and menstruation ensues. This initiates the beginning of a new cycle.
The majority of recent information on the role of the endometrium and on the functional changes occurring in the normal endometrium stems from the histologic investigations performed on human endometrial biopsies, as well as from studies carried out in vivo in animal species (particularly baboons and gene knockout mice) and in vitro in primary cell cultures of human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs).
Despite the considerable differences among the species, the overall emerging picture is that decidualization of the endometrium is a process involving profound cell reprogramming, tissue remodeling, changes in gene expression and post-translation regulation, and alterations in cell signaling pathways. Considerable changes and modulation of the activity of the immune cells at a local level also occurs. These events involve a large number of molecular mediators and effectors. A summary of the major endometrial changes characteristic of decidualization in women is described in Table 1.
The detailed description of all the changes and the mediators involved in decidualization is beyond the scope of the present article and has been discussed in several excellent reviews recently [9,10,11,12,13]. Here, the major focus is to evaluate the significance of the endometrial changes, particularly decidualization, in relation to the role played by the immune system.
Decidualization can be evolutionarily considered to have two, not mutually exclusive functions. On the one hand, it can be considered as the biological solution of a maternal–fetal conflict in which the invasiveness of the embryo, aimed to maximally ensure the expansion of fetal genes (partially different from the maternal ones) is contrasted by the need of maternal genes to ensure their own expansion in the present and future pregnancies [14]. On the other hand, it can be viewed as the adaptive response to the maternal need of controlling its relevant investment in a pregnancy bearing a single, high quality fetus for a prolonged period of time [15]. This concept is supported by robust evidence indicating that the decidualized endometrium acts as a biosensor of the quality of the embryo [16,17], that implantation is characterized by a cooperation between the embryo and the decidualized endometrium [18], and that the loss of endometrial plasticity can be implicated in unexplained RPL [19]. Many key events occurring in the endometrium during decidualization implantation and in the decidua throughout pregnancy are realized with the relevant contribution of the immune cells and are mediated by many immunoregulatory molecules. Emerging evidence suggests that derangements in the normal immune function can occur in these tissues in subsets of women with RPL.

2.2. Immune Cells and Their Functions in the Normal Endometrium and Decidua

A great body of experimental work has been carried out to investigate the specific populations of immune cells in the endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle, during implantation, and early pregnancy; their specific roles in early pregnancy together with the regulatory molecules that are expressed are being characterized. This information is summarized in Table 2 and Table 3. Likewise, a growing number of mechanisms are proposed to explain the development of maternal tolerance towards the immunologically different conceptus. These proposed mechanisms—schematically summarized in Table 4 and illustrated in Figure 1a,b—could be the basis to explain, understand, and, possibly, treat the immune-mediated RPL, that likely represent a substantial proportion of all unexplained RPL. However, it is actually extremely difficult to disentangle the most important mechanisms from the accessory ones. The emerging overall picture strongly suggests that in normal pregnancy, the maternal immune system undergoes considerable modulation in at least many (if not all) key components in order to develop tolerance towards the foreign paternal antigens of the fetus and an immunologically favorable environment for the fetus while at the same time maintaining full responsive capacity against other foreign antigens [20,21,22,23]. The pregnancy-related changes in the immune cells and system occurring in the endometrium and decidua are only partially determined. Nevertheless, with regard to the success of implantation, the most important changes known so far in the endometrial immune cells involve macrophages, uterine natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs), T cells, especially cytolytic T cells (CTLs), whose specific roles have been, at least in part, determined.

2.2.1. Macrophages

Macrophages occur in low numbers in the non-pregnant endometrium, even though their numbers substantially increase in the luteal phase of the cycle. Their number dramatically increases as pregnancy occurs, reaching 20%–25% of all leukocytes in the decidua, as shown in Table 2. There is evidence that the macrophages in the decidua differentiate toward an immunoregulatory M2 type, since they express several M2 markers [81]. The possibility has been raised that also a proinflammatory subset of macrophages is present, although to a much lesser extent, in the early decidua [82]. During early pregnancy, macrophages are localized mainly close to invading trophoblast cells and to the spiral arteries [83] and are believed to play several relevant roles and functions in early pregnancy: enhancement of blastocyst implantation and trophoblast invasion, remodeling of spiral arteries, clearance of apoptotic cells and cell debris, as well as protection of the fetus against foreign pathogens [30,31,32,33,34,35,81,84,85]. It has been shown that decidual spiral artery remodeling begins before cellular interaction with cytotrophoblasts [86] and that matrix remodeling in spiral arteries is initiated by infiltrating leucocytes, including macrophages, while extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) become involved at later stages [87]. Four discrete stages of vascular remodeling have been described according to the extent of smooth muscle cells disruption in human decidual vessels [88]. Vessel infiltration by macrophages has been found to be more prominent in the intermediate stages II and III [88].

2.2.2. NK Cells

NK cells are lymphocytes with multiple biologic actions including cytotoxicity and cytokine-producing capacity [89]. In the peripheral blood, two populations of NK cells are present—the CD56 dim CD16+ NK, that are cytotoxic toward tumors and virally infected cells and comprise 90% of circulating NK cells, and the CD56brightCD16− NK, whose main activity is regulatory through the secretion of cytokines [81,89]. Decidual or uterine NK (uNK) cells which are present in the decidua are distinct from peripheral blood NK (pbNK) cells [83,90]. They constitute 50%–90% of lymphocytes in human uterine decidua in early pregnancy. A comparative microarray analysis demonstrated that the uNK cells are distinctly different from pbNK cells and have an increased expression of a number of surface proteins, including lectin receptors, killer cell Ig-like receptors, tetraspanins, and integrin subunits. In addition, the secreted immunomodulatory molecules, galectin-1 and glycodelin (PAEP), were also selectively expressed on the dNK cells [91]. Uterine NK (uNK) are the predominant leukocyte population in the endometrium, increase progressively throughout the menstrual cycle, and are maximal in early pregnancy, being ~75% of the decidual leukocyte population [27]. uNK are phenotypically similar, although not identical, to circulating CD56brightCD16− [91,92,93] and during early pregnancy are found adjacent to the invading trophoblast cells [88,94]. This observation, together with the finding that activated uNK can produce angiogenic factors (VEGF and ANG2) and a vast array of cytokines, including GM-CSF, CSF-1, TNFα, IFN-γ, TGF-β, LIF, IL2, CXCL10, and CXL12 [91], suggest a role of uNK in promoting trophoblast invasion, protecting the embryo from maternal immune attack, and enhancing angiogenesis [88,95]. The role of decidual natural killer cells (dNK) in regulating trophoblast invasion and the maternal immune response against trophoblasts is also strongly suggested by the observation that dNK, or uNK cells, in addition to their specific location in close proximity to the trophoblast, also express the specific appropriate receptors for those human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) that are uniquely expressed by the trophoblasts, i.e., the killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIR) for HLA-C, the CD94/NKG2A for HLA-E, and the ILT2 for HLA-G [70,96]. The combined interaction between the dNK/uNK cells and the HLAs of trophoblasts is believed to be a potential key factor involved in the prevention of the maternal immune rejection of the conceptus [72,73,97,98].

2.2.3. DCs

Dendritic cells have a dual role—they can differentiate into potent antigen presenting cells which can activate effector T cells or, in their immature state, they can enhance immune tolerance by inducing the generation of Tregs [99]. In the decidua, DCs are believed to play an important role in maternal recognition of paternal antigens in both pre- and implantation periods. In particular, the seminal fluid has the ability to recruit DCs (as well as macrophages) to the decidua; DCs, in turn, can take up and present the seminal soluble major histocompatibility complex (MHC) T cells in the regional draining lymph nodes and induce the expansion of Tregs population [21,100,101]. DCs in a specific cytokine environment, characterized by the predominance of G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-4, IL-10, and TGFβ and in the presence of IDO, acquire the phenotype of tolerogenic DCs (tDCs) and become able to drive the differentiation of naïve Th0 cells towards tolerogenic regulatory T cells (Tregs) rather than towards cytotoxic effector T cells [33,54]. In addition to the above immunological actions, DCs have been suggested to play a relevant trophic role by enhancing both endometrial stromal cell differentiation and proliferation and local angiogenesis [102].

2.2.4. Tregs

Tregs (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+) are a subset of CD4+ T cells and are important components of adaptive immunity since their major function is to limit immune reaction. Tregs are involved in immunological self- and transplant tolerance and play a relevant role in preventing autoimmune responses against self antigens [103,104]. Therefore, the possibility that these functions of Tregs might be instrumental in the proper immunologic relationship between the mother and the embryo has been raised, and recent convincing evidence defines the potential key role of these cells in early pregnancy [21,33,54,65,105]. It has been shown, in both mice and in humans, during normal pregnancy there is an expansion in the population of decidual Tregs, which exert several pregnancy-promoting actions [54]: prevention of the immune rejection of the fetal paternal antigens by effector T cells, induction of decidual support for embryo implantation through their action on other leukocyte and non-leukocytes cell types [106], and by enhancing proper maternal vascular remodeling [107]. There is evidence supporting the concept that the pregnancy-promoting actions of Tregs are particularly relevant in the peri-implantation period and in the very early stages of pregnancy, whereas the role of Tregs in later stages appears to be more limited [108].

2.2.5. Other Components of the Immune System

The role of other components of the immune system, such as granulocytes, CD8+ cells, and B cells, has been scarcely explored to date, particularly in relation to RPL; further investigation is needed to better determine the potential relevance of these important components of innate and adaptive immunity. However, with specific application to B cells and plasma cells, emerging data support the concept that regulatory B (Breg) cells—a subset of B cells with immunosuppressive properties mainly studied in autoimmunity, cancer, and transplantation tolerance—can play a role also in pregnancy since they are a major cellular source of the powerful anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Moreover, Breg cells induce suppression of other immune cell populations and can enhance induction and maintenance of Tregs [109]. A reduction in the number of Breg cells has been observed in women with spontaneous abortion [110]. In normal pregnancy, hCG induces the expansion of Bregs, as well as their IL-10 production; moreover, hCG enhances the generation of plasma cells capable to produce specific pregnancy-protective antibodies [111].

2.3. Cytokine/Chemokine Network and the Maternal–Fetal Immune Cross-Talk

The molecular dialogue between the trophoblast, the decidua, and the maternal immune cells aimed at the proper control of embryo implantation and early pregnancy progression is mediated by a network of cytokines and chemokines. The extensive research carried out so far in this field has revealed that a vast and continuously increasing array of cytokines and chemokines could be potentially involved, to various degrees, in the immune and non-immune relationship between the mother and the conceptus. The cytokines suggested to play a role in this context include at least IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IL-18, IL-22, IL-23, IL-34 LIF, TGFβ, G-CSF, GM-CSF, TNF-α, and IFN-γ [21,23,33,99,112,113,114,115,116,117]. The chemokines potentially involved include at least CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL17, CCL19, CCL20, CCL22, CXCL8, CXCL9, CX3CL1, CXCL10, CXCL12, and CXCL16 [40,99,118,119]. The high number of cytokines and chemokines believed to participate at least to some extent in maternal–fetal interactions, the pleiotropic actions of many of the above molecules and their redundant and often overlapping effects make it extremely difficult to clearly disentangle the actual role of each molecule. Despite these limitations, the function of selected cytokines and chemokines in the immunologic interaction between the mother and the trophoblast is being discovered in several cases. For instance, the importance of LIF in early stages of embryo implantation has become clear [120]; moreover, emerging evidence strongly suggests that on the one hand, the major pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α, released by uterine macrophages sensitized by seminal fluid antigens, contribute to the development of tolerogenic DCs (tDCs) [54]; on the other hand, after embryo implantation, the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGFβ play key roles in the regulation of tolerogenic DCs in the decidua, in reducing the local inflammatory response and in driving the expansion of Treg cells [33,54]. Among the chemokines, CXCL1 was found to be markedly upregulated in decidualized human endometrial stromal cells [121]. The large body of experimental work carried out so far supports the general concept that the cytokines, the chemokines, and their receptors can be expressed and produced by the glandular epithelial and stromal cells of the endometrium, by the decidual cells, by the cellular components of the innate and acquired immunity, as well as by the trophoblast cells; their network creates a local microenvironment of paramount importance for the successful implantation of the embryo, for the regulation of trophoblast migration, and, therefore, for the proper development of the pregnancy. Further investigation is still needed: (1) to clearly define the specific contribution of each of the above molecules in the maternal–fetal immune dialogue; (2) to verify the applicability of the information obtained in animal models to human pregnancy, taking into account the differences between the species [99].

3. Immune Dysregulation in the Endometrium and Decidua in RPL

The evidence indicating the fundamental role of proper immunologic dialogue between the mother and conceptus in the normal implantation and pregnancy development has prompted a large number of studies aimed at investigating the impact of dysregulations in the maternal–fetal immune relationship in RPL. This is particularly so for the so-called “unexplained” RPL (uRPL), which accounts for around 50% of the cases of RPL. Many of the abnormalities found in this context occur within the endometrium and the decidua, which is the major maternal–fetal interface. In this section, for reasons of clarity, the relevant findings will be divided according to the specific cell types involved and then to the overall network of immunoregulatory molecules.

3.1. Endometrial Cells in RPL with Specific Application to the Regulation of the Local Immune Function

It has been suggested that there are evolutionary adapted checkpoints during early pregnancy which are designed to reject a pregnancy if the conceptus or the receptive endometrium is compromised [13]. An inadequately developed decidualized endometrium is one of them. Several studies have demonstrated that the transformation of the stromal fibroblasts into the decidual phenotype is compromised in RPL patients [19,122,123]. The importance of a proper decidualization of endometrial stromal cells in implantation and early pregnancy maintenance has been elucidated by a series of observations supporting the concept that endometrium is a fine biosensor of the quality of the implanting embryo [15,17,19]. Specifically, studies carried out on human endometrial stromal cells have shown that these cells, when differentiating into decidual cells, become sensitive to embryonic signals to whom they respond differently according to the quality of the embryo. In normal women, low-quality embryos inhibit the secretion of factors playing a key role in implantation; conversely, developmentally competent embryos produce signals promoting implantation [16]. These studies provide experimental evidence that the endometrium of normally fertile women is selective towards the embryo and that low-quality embryos undergo an early rejection. Conversely, the endometrium of women with RPL is less sensitive and allows the implantation of low-quality embryos, which will be rejected later in pregnancy. This hypothesis is further supported by the clinical observation that women with RPL have a shorter time-to-pregnancy—the time needed to become pregnant—than normally fertile women [122,124]. Even though the specific mechanisms underlying these derangements are still uncertain, it is likely that the disordered decidual response observed in women with RPL involves immune system mediators and cells, since it is characterized by the failure of endometrial stromal cells to transit from an initially proinflammatory phenotype to an anti-inflammatory one during decidualization, as normally occurs in physiological conditions [9].

3.2. Immune Cells in the Endometrium in RPL

3.2.1. Macrophages

There is scant information on the role of macrophages in RPL. Very recent experimental evidence shows that in women with uRPL, no reduction of M1 decidual macrophages can be detected [31], in contrast to what occurs in normal pregnancy. This finding suggests that in women with uRPL, there would be a limited differentiation of macrophages toward the M2 immunoregulatory polarization. This is in agreement with the results of a previous study, in which decidual macrophages from women with uRPL showed an increased expression of CD80, CD86, and a lower expression of IL-10 compared with control women [125]. These findings suggest that the macrophage regulation capacity of Tregs, mediated by TGFβ and by cell–cell contact, is decreased in women with uRPL [125]. However, further investigation is needed to further clarify the role of macrophages in RPL [85], since similar reduction in the M2 macrophage population has been also observed in women with spontaneous sporadic miscarriage [31].

3.2.2. uNKs

Considerable interest in the role of uNKs in pregnancy complications, and particularly in RPL, reflects the recognized importance of these cells in implantation and in early pregnancy. Overall results indicate that RPL is associated with several/different abnormalities in uterine/decidual NK cell number and function, although some controversy still exists. Most of the studies support the concept that in uRPL, the pregnancy-promoting functions of uNK are dysregulated in several ways. Indeed, in women with uRPL, higher concentrations of uNK have been detected than in normal fertile controls [92,126,127,128,129,130,131], even though this finding has not always been consistent [132]. In other studies, despite no differences in the proportion of endometrial NK cells between controls and women with RPL, women with RPL have a significant decrease in the CD16−CD56bright NK cell subset, that is normally found in uncomplicated pregnancies [133]; this suggests that uNK cells in women with uRPL are quantitatively and qualitatively different from those normally found. Accumulating evidence supports this hypothesis. For instance, it has been shown that women with uRPL have increased endometrial populations of cytotoxic CD16+uNK [92] and of uNK expressing the natural cytotoxicity receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30 at higher levels than those detected in control women and in women with unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure [28,92,134,135]. This suggests that the cytotoxic activity of uNK is higher in RPL than in control women. Even though the results are not always unequivocal, it is becoming clear that uNK has different characteristics in women with uRPL. Another subset of uNK cells, the IL-22-producing NK cells (NK22), has been found to be differently regulated in women with RPL. An increase in the proportion of NK22 cells has been detected in the endometrium, as well as in the peripheral blood, of women with unexplained RPL compared with women with unexplained infertility [136,137]. However, uNK cells in the decidua of women with unexplained RPL have a significantly lesser gene and protein expression of IL-22 than normal women [138]. Further investigation is needed to fully clarify the role of endometrial IL-22 and NK22 in RPL. Conflicting data obtained in uNK determinations in relation to RPL still exist and this could be due to differences in the populations studied or in the assay methodologies used or the complexity of subtypes of uNK cells in the endometrium and decidua. This point is particularly relevant, since there is the need for a standardization in the measurement of uNK in women with RPL, in order to better characterize several still-uncovered aspects concerning the actual role of these relevant cells in RPL [93,139], with potentially useful applications also in clinical practice. In fact, at present it still uncertain what the prognostic value of the determination of uNK count and parameters in women with uRPL are [140].
There is still an open debate on whether, or to which extent, the peripheral NK cell subsets correlate with the endometrial NK cells in normal women, in infertile women, and in women with RPL, even though there is evidence that peripheral NK cells could reflect, at least to some degree, the local endometrial environment [131,141,142,143,144,145,146]. This issue is beyond the scope of the present article, which is focused on the local endometrial immune environment in RPL.
The dysregulation of NK cells in the endometrium and decidua of women with RPL has potentially important consequences, leading to fatal pregnancy impairment. Particularly relevant in this context are the maintained cytotoxicity of uNK [23], the impaired capacity of uNK to properly interact with the specific HLA expressed by trophoblast [146,147,148], the impaired capacity of uNK to effectively participate in the full vascular remodeling of the uterine spiral arteries [129,149], the impaired capacity of uNK in limiting T cell cytotoxicity [61], and a disturbed cytokine production pattern by uNK [143,150,151].
Therefore, evidence is accumulating that in uRPL, uNK are profoundly dysregulated in their major pregnancy-promoting functions.

3.2.3. Uterine Dendritic Cells (uDCs)

The discovery of the important role of uDCs as powerful pregnancy-promoting cells at the maternal–fetal interface has prompted an increasing interest in unraveling the potential involvement of these immunoregulatory cells in RPL. There is evidence that abnormalities in uDCs are associated with early pregnancy disorders. In a transgenic mouse model, depletion of uDCs impairs embryo implantation and results in embryo resorption [152]. This action could be exerted independently of the immunoregulatory effect of uDCs, suggesting that uDCs could exert other supporting roles in implantation in addition to their tolerogenic action [152]. In human studies, it has been shown: (1) that elevated levels of Th1-inducing myeloid DCs and reduced levels of tolerogenic CD200+ DC subsets in peripheral blood are associated with RPL [153]; (2) that mature (non-tolerogenic) dendritic cells in gestational decidua and placenta are increased and immature tolerogenic uDCs are decreased in women with RPL compared with normal women [154,155]; (3) that in women with RPL there is a downregulation of ILT4+ tolerogenic DCs in both peripheral blood and endometrium [156].

3.2.4. Tregs

Considerable information is available on the potential role of Treg alterations in RPL. As in the case of uNK, the emerging role of these cells in embryo implantation and in maternal immunotolerance in pregnancy has prompted a growing research interest in this issue. Studies carried out on animal models revealed that depletion of CD4+CD25+ Tregs resulted in the greatest increase in miscarriage rates [157,158], which were linked to the expansion of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells occurring only in the uterine draining lymph nodes [158]. Conversely, the transfer of Tregs could prevent miscarriage in abortion-prone mice [159,160]. Interestingly, this action is of particular relevance at the time of implantation and in early pregnancy with a less marked effect in more advanced gestation [20,108,161], suggesting that Tregs play a key role mainly at implantation and in the very early stages of pregnancy. Studies of Tregs in women with RPL are in substantial agreement with the findings obtained in animal models. Women with RPL have reduced Tregs in peripheral blood [162,163,164], as well as in their endometrium and decidua, compared with normal women [163,165,166,167]. The reduction in Tregs in women with uRPL is paralleled by an increase in Th17 cells [166,168], suggesting the presence of an imbalance in Tregs/Th17 cells in uRPL [169,170,171]. The likely involvement of Tregs in uRPL is also supported by the studies carried out on the forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), a transcription factor essential for the development and function of Tregs. There is an increased occurrence of the following mutant genotypes and alleles of FOXP3 single nucleotide polymorphisms in women with uRPL compared with control women: rs2232365, rs3761548, rs5902434, and rs2294021 [172,173]. Moreover, FOXP3 expression was reduced in peripheral blood and decidua in women with uRPL compared with normal women [163]. In women with both uRPL and sporadic miscarriages, abnormalities in the normal function exerted by Tregs in uncomplicated pregnancies have been identified including: (1) higher numbers of Tregs from women with uRPL than normally fertile women were required to inhibit proliferation of CD4+CD25- effector cells in response to paternal allostimulation [56], and (2) the Helios+ Tregs—a supposed functionally active subset [174]—are reduced in the decidua of women with sporadic miscarriage with normal embryo karyotype [165]. This last finding suggests that also some (or several) cases of sporadic miscarriage, with normal fetal chromosome content, might be associated with the immune etiology of miscarriage [165]. Since Tregs are involved in the downregulation of an excessive inflammatory response toward the implanting embryo and the fetus, it is conceivable that dysregulation and/or dysfunction of these cells could be a relevant factor leading to RPL. Finally, it cannot be excluded that unstable dysregulated Tregs could directly be involved in fetal rejection, since Tregs are highly plastic, allowing them to transdifferentiate, under specific conditions, into effector T cells [175].

3.3. Endometrial Cytokine Imbalance in RPL

Consistent experimental evidence indicates that RPL is associated with an imbalance in the endometrial and decidual cytokine environment typical of the normal pregnancy. The general concept is that in women with uRPL, as well in animals prone to RPL, a dysregulated production of several cytokines relevant for implantation and early pregnancy promotion occurs in both immune and non-immune cells present or recruited into the endometrium and decidua. This generates an unfavorable cytokine environment which, in turn, can impair the tolerance of the maternal immune system towards the trophoblast and lead to the rejection of the conceptus. Owing to the complexity of the endometrial cytokine network, which additionally undergoes profound changes in pregnancy, it is difficult to identify all the cytokines involved in the determination of uRPL and define the relative importance of each specific substance. Moreover, it can be difficult to exactly determine the specific cell source of these factors, which are probably secreted by a wide variety of both immune- and non-immune cells. Despite the above limitations, several selected cytokines are believed to play a significant role in this context. These cytokines include at least IL-1, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IL-18, IL-22, IL-23, IL-27, TGF-β, TGF-β1, IFN-γ, TNF-α, LIF, and MIF. The reported changes of these cytokines in the endometrium and/or decidua in women with RPL compared with normal women are summarized in Table 5.
Even though the results are sometimes conflicting, due to methodological differences in cell/tissue preparation or separation, as well as in assay techniques, the emerging picture clearly defines a potentially relevant role for selected molecules, such as IL-1α and β, TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-10, and LIF. However, the potential relevant contribution of many other cytokines in RPL cannot be excluded.
Since the results concerning the variations in expression/production of many cytokines by the endometrium and decidua in RPL are still conflicting, possibly owing to the above mentioned limitations, some more details will be given for few selected substances for which enough agreement exists.
It is believed that uRPL is associated with a decrease in the decidual TGFβ. This is due to a reduced production of TGFβ by decidual dendritic cells [176], to a reduced mRNA expression of TGFβ [166], and to a reduced proportion of TGFβ+ Tregs in the decidua [177] of women with RPL compared to normal control women. Since TGFβ has a recognized pregnancy-promoting role in implantation and early pregnancy development, it is likely that a defective production of this cytokine can be involved in uRPL of immune etiology.
An increase in endometrial levels and decidual mRNA and protein expression of IFN-γ has been consistently found in women with RPL [177,178,179,180,181]. RPL in presence of an excess of IFN-γ could be the consequence of an excessive inflammatory reaction in the decidua, triggered by IFN-γ; moreover, IFN-γ has a toxic effect on the embryo by inducing apoptosis [33] and, therefore, RPL.
IL-10 contributes, together with other cytokines and immunoregulatory substances such as TGFβ and IDO, to the differentiation of DC into the tolerogenic phenotype, which, in turn, regulates the expansion of Treg population in the decidua. The observed decrease in IL-10 expression and production in the decidua of women with uRPL [176,177,178,179,180] can hamper this immunoprotective action.
The results obtained by studying the local uterine abnormalities in cytokine levels/production are only in partial agreement with those found in studies carried out on peripheral blood and cells, leaving open the question on whether it could be possible to obtain markers suggestive of immunologic RPL from the peripheral blood [136,143,151,182,183,184]. Additionally, conflicting results were found in several meta-analyses aimed at evaluating the importance of specific SNP for selected cytokines in women with RPL [185,186]. Therefore, the immunogenetic contribution of cytokine gene variations in RPL needs further evaluation to be clearly determined [187].

4. Conclusions and Future Directions

In the last three decades, enormous progress has been made in the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying the maternal acceptance of the genetically and immunologically different embryo. The emerging picture can be synthesized as follows: (a) it has become clear that the maternal immune system is intimately involved in the establishment, maintenance, development, and termination of the normal pregnancy. In this context, it is logical and highly plausible that the immune system has been used to regulate all the phases of the pregnancy and, possibly, of reproduction in evolved animals; (b) multiple mechanisms have been developed to prevent the maternal immune dysfunction leading to the loss of pregnancy. These mechanisms are aimed to induce an overall immunological tolerance of the mother towards the fetus while maintaining full immunological reactivity against all the other foreign antigens. To reach this objective, the maternal immune system needs to undergo a modulation which involves many, if not all, the major cellular and molecular components of the adaptive and innate immune systems, assigning to each of them specific, although sometimes redundant, duties; (c) the involvement of the maternal immune system is not limited to a correct immunologic dialogue at the maternal–fetal interface, but is extended to the uterine (endometrial) tissue breakdown, vascular remodeling, and placentation; (d) the trophoblast actively participates in its own survival and modulation of the maternal immune response to its presence; in this respect, its behavior is more similar to that of a tumor rather than to a transplant; (e) the maternal immune response to the conceptus undergoes considerable changes according to the gestational age. In fact, recent evidence supports the concept that the implantation of the embryo evokes an initial, early, inflammatory reaction which is promptly followed by the establishment of an anti-inflammatory decidual environment, allowing the survival of the conceptus and the progression of the pregnancy. A final, even more powerful, inflammatory reaction occurs in late gestation and results in labor and the delivery of the fetus. All of these events fully involve the maternal immune system.
In this context, it is very likely that derangements of the immune system can be operative in at least some women with unexplained RPL, in which no other clinical causes or explanation can be found. In these women, it is highly likely that an immune dysfunction occurs in the endometrium and in the decidua, which represents the major maternal–fetal interface and in which significant immunologic changes are known to physiologically occur. However, it is possible that different abnormalities in the immune system lead to the same final effect—the RPL—in different women; in other words, it is possible that different immunological modes of RPL exist. Some of these modes are summarized in Table 6 and Figure 1c.
Future research is needed to answer this relevant question and to help develop effective immunologic treatments for this subset of women with RPL. Considerable progress is needed in this area. In fact, the currently available treatments for RPL of supposed immune etiology are rather limited, empiric in the majority of cases, and with low efficacy, with few exceptions, such as aspirin/aspirin plus heparin when used in the case of RPL in women with antiphospholipid antibodies [194]. Other treatments based on a potentially reasonable immune background, as in the case of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), have been shown to have a potential efficacy in selected groups of women with RPL and when initiated before pregnancy [195].
Future perspectives in the treatment of RPL of immune etiology could be aimed to correct abnormal decidualization as well as dysfunctions of the immune mechanisms occurring in the endometrium and decidua, on the basis of the emerging evidence. As an example, the effects of seminal plasma on the expansion of Tregs could allow an innovative therapeutic approach, that is already being used in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), even though with still controversial results [196,197,198].
Another emerging area of investigation and potentially useful treatment is represented by situations in which RPL is associated with chronic inflammation of the endometrium (chronic endometritis, CE). CE, that is still poorly considered in most diagnostic protocols for RPL, in a recent study has been found in a substantial proportion (27%) of women with unexplained RPL [199]. This finding confirms the results of previous studies in which CE has been detected in 13%–56% of women with RPL [200,201] and supports the concept that CE could be a not negligible cause of RPL. The suggested mechanism by which CE could determine RPL is an alteration of the normal decidualization of endometrial stromal cells [202]. Since proper treatment of CE in RPL women can lead to improvement in live birth rates [203], the clear detection of this condition can be beneficial at least in a subset of these patients.

Author Contributions

C.T. conceived the review, determined the general design and structure of the article, wrote the article, and reviewed and edited it; A.P., N.D.S., and E.P. reviewed and edited the article; A.F. determined the general design and structure of the article, wrote the article, and reviewed and edited it. All the authors gave a significant intellectual contribution to the article.

Funding

The present article was supported by a grant received from the University Tor Vergata for the research Project IKiRM (Inflammatory and oxidant trophoblastic factors expression in unexplained recurrent miscarriage).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Guideline of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE Early Pregnancy Guidline Development Group. pp. 1–153. Available online: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Recurrent-pregnancy-loss.aspx (accessed on 26 November 2017).
  2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013, 99, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. El Hachem, H.; Crepaux, V.; May-Panloup, P.; Descamps, P.; Legendre, G.; Bouet, P.E. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Perspectives. Int. J. Womens Health 2017, 9, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Garrido-Gimenez, C.; Alijotas-Reig, J. Recurrent Miscarriage: Causes, Evaluation and Management. Postgrad. Med. J. 2015, 91, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jeve, Y.B.; Davies, W. Evidence-Based Management of Recurrent Miscarriages. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 7, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, N.F.; Kolte, A.M.; Larsen, E.C.; Nielsen, H.S.; Christiansen, O.B. Immunologic Abnormalities, Treatments, and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: What Is Real and What Is Not? Clin. Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 59, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gleicher, N.; Kushnir, V.A.; Barad, D.H. Redirecting Reproductive Immunology Research Toward Pregnancy as a Period of Temporary Immune Tolerance. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bazer, F.W.; Spencer, T.E.; Johnson, G.A.; Burghardt, C.; Wu, G. Comparative Aspects of Implantation. Reproduction 2009, 138, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gellersen, B.; Brosens, J.J. Cyclic Decidualization of the Human Endometrium in Reproductive Health and Failure. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 851–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Okada, H.; Tsuzuki, T.; Murata, H. Decidualization of the Human Endometrium. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2018, 17, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Makieva, S.; Giacomini, E.; Ottolina, J.; Sanchez, A.M.; Papaleo, E.; Vigano, P. Inside the Endometrial Cell Signaling Subway: Mind the Gap(s). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, R.W.; Fazleabas, A.T. Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Human and Nonhuman Primates. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 216, 189–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ewington, L.J.; Tewary, S.; Brosens, J.J. New Insights into the Mechanisms Underlying Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019, 45, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Emera, D.; Romero, R.; Wagner, G. The Evolution of Menstruation: A New Model for Genetic Assimilation: Explaining Molecular Origins of Maternal Responses to Fetal Invasiveness. Bioessays 2012, 34, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lucas, E.S.; Dyer, N.P.; Fishwick, K.; Ott, S.; Brosens, J.J. Success after Failure: The Role of Endometrial Stem Cells in Recurrent Miscarriage. Reproduction 2016, 152, R159–R166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brosens, J.J.; Salker, M.S.; Teklenburg, G.; Nautiyal, J.; Salter, S.; Lucas, E.S.; Steel, J.H.; Christian, M.; Chan, Y.W.; Boomsma, C.M.; et al. Uterine Selection of Human Embryos at Implantation. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Macklon, N.S.; Brosens, J.J. The Human Endometrium as a Sensor of Embryo Quality. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 91, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Quenby, S.; Brosens, J.J. Human Implantation: A tale of Mutual Maternal and Fetal Attraction. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 88, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lucas, E.S.; Dyer, N.P.; Murakami, K.; Lee, Y.H.; Chan, Y.W.; Grimaldi, G.; Muter, J.; Brighton, P.J.; Moore, J.D.; Patel, G.; et al. Loss of Endometrial Plasticity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Stem. Cells 2016, 34, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zenclussen, A.C.; Hammerling, G.J. Cellular Regulation of the Uterine Microenvironment That Enables Embryo Implantation. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schumacher, A.; Sharkey, D.J.; Robertson, S.A.; Zenclussen, A.C. Immune Cells at the Fetomaternal Interface: How the Microenvironment Modulates Immune Cells To Foster Fetal Development. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Racicot, K.; Kwon, J.Y.; Aldo, P.; Silasi, M.; Mor, G. Understanding the Complexity of the Immune System During Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 72, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. PrabhuDas, M.; Bonney, E.; Caron, K.; Dey, S.; Erlebacher, A.; Fazleabas, A.; Fisher, S.; Golos, T.; Matzuk, M.; McCune, J.M.; et al. Immune Mechanisms at the Maternal-Fetal Interface: Perspectives and Challenges. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, S.K.; Kim, C.J.; Kim, D.J.; Kang, J.H. Immune Cells in the Female Reproductive Tract. Immune. Netw. 2015, 15, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mori, M.; Bogdan, A.; Balassa, T.; Csabai, T.; Szekeres-Bartho, J. The Decidua-The Maternal Bed Embracing the Embryo-Maintains the Pregnancy. In Seminars and Immunopathol; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; Volume 38, pp. 635–649. [Google Scholar]
  26. Drury, J.A.; Parkin, K.L.; Coyne, L.; Giuliani, E.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Hapangama, D.K. The Dynamic Changes in the Number of Uterine Natural Killer Cells are Specific to the Eutopic but not to the Ectopic Endometrium in Women and in a Baboon Model of Endometriosis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018, 16, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Manaster, I.; Mizrahi, S.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Sela, H.Y.; Stern-Ginossar, N.; Lankry, D.; Gruda, R.; Hurwitz, A.; Bdolah, Y.; Haimov-Kochman, R.; et al. Endometrial NK Cells are Special Immature Cells that Await Pregnancy. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 1869–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fukui, A.; Funamizu, A.; Fukuhara, R.; Shibahara, H. Expression of Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors and Cytokine Production on Endometrial Natural Killer Cells in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss or Implantation Failure, and the Expression of Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors on Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cells in Pregnant Women with a History of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2017, 43, 1678–1686. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, M.; Lee, S.K. Role of Endometrial Immune Cells in Implantation. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2011, 38, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Faas, M.M.; De Vos, P. Innate Immune Cells in the Placental Bed in Healthy Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Placenta 2018, 69, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsao, F.Y.; Wu, M.Y.; Chang, Y.L.; Wu, C.T.; Ho, H.N. M1 Macrophages Decrease in the Deciduae from Normal Pregnancies but not from Spontaneous Abortions or Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2018, 117, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Erlebacher, A. Immunology of the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 31, 387–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Robertson, S.A.; Moldenhauer, L.M. Immunological Determinants of Implantation Success. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2014, 58, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Care, A.S.; Diener, K.R.; Jasper, M.J.; Brown, H.M.; Ingman, W.V.; Robertson, S.A. Macrophages Regulate Corpus Luteum Development During Embryo Implantation in Mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2013, 123, 3472–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Renaud, S.J.; Graham, C.H. The Role of Macrophages in Utero-Placental Interactions During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy. Immunol. Invest. 2008, 37, 535–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jeziorska, M.; Salamonsen, L.A.; Woolley, D.E. Mast Cell and Eosinophil Distribution and Activation in Human Endometrium Throughout the Menstrual Cycle. Biol. Reprod. 1995, 53, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Leo, B.; Esnal-Zufiaurre, A.; Collins, F.; Critchley, H.O.D.; Saunders, P.T.K. Immunoprofiling of Human Uterine Mast Cells Identifies Three Phenotypes and Expression of ERβ and Glucocorticoid Receptor. F1000Res. 2017, 6, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. King, A. Uterine Leukocytes and Decidualization. Hum. Reprod. Update 2000, 6, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schulke, L.; Manconi, F.; Markham, R.; Fraser, I.S. Endometrial Dendritic Cell Populations During the Normal Menstrual Cycle. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 23, 1574–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramhorst, R.; Grasso, E.; Paparini, D.; Hauk, V.; Gallino, L.; Calo, G.; Vota, D.; Perez Leiros, C. Decoding the Chemokine Network that Links Leukocytes with Decidual Cells and the Trophoblast During Early Implantation. Cell Adh. Migr. 2016, 10, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rieger, L.; Honig, A.; Sutterlin, M.; Kapp, M.; Dietl, J.; Ruck, P.; Kammerer, U. Antigen-Presenting Cells in Human Endometrium During the Menstrual Cycle Compared to Early Pregnancy. J. Soc. Gynecol. Invest. 2004, 11, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maridas, D.E.; Hey-Cunningham, A.J.; Ng, C.H.M.; Markham, R.; Fraser, I.S.; Berbic, M. Peripheral and Endometrial Dendritic Cell Populations During the Normal Cycle and in the Presence of Endometriosis. J. Endometr. Pelvic Pain Disord. 2014, 6, 67–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zenclussen, A.C.; Olivieri, D.N.; Dustin, M.L.; Tadokoro, C.E. In Vivo Multiphoton Microscopy Technique to Reveal the Physiology of the Mouse Uterus. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 69, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nadkarni, S.; Smith, J.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N.; Ledwozyw, A.; Kishore, M.; Haas, R.; Mauro, C.; Williams, D.J.; Farsky, S.H.P.; Marelli-Berg, F.M.; et al. Neutrophils Induce Proangiogenic T Cells with a Regulatory Phenotype in Pregnancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E8415–E8424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. King, A.E.; Critchley, H.O.D.; Kelly, R.W. Innate Immune Defences in the Human Endometrium. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2003, 1, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Armstrong, G.M.; Maybin, J.A.; Murray, A.A.; Nicol, M.; Walker, C.; Saunders, P.T.K.; Rossi, A.G.; Critchley, H.O.D. Endometrial Apoptosis and Neutrophil Infiltration During Menstruation Exhibits Spatial and Temporal Dynamics that are Recapitulated in a Mouse Model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 12, 17416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Salamonsen, L.A.; Lathbury, L.J. Endometrial Leukocytes and Menstruation. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2000, 6, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Harrity, C.; Bereir, M.M.; Walsh, D.J.; Marron, K.D. Moving from Peripheral Blood to Local Uterine Immunophenotype Analysis in Patients with Poor Reproductive History: Pilot Study of a Novel Technique. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 188, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Flynn, L.; Byrne, B.; Carton, J.; Kelehan, P.; O’Herlihy, C.; O’Farrelly, C. Menstrual Cycle Dependent Fluctuations in NK and T-Lymphocyte Subsets from Non-Pregnant Human Endometrium. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2000, 43, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chang, H.F.; Bzeih, H.; Chitirala, P.; Ravichandran, K.; Sleiman, M.; Krause, E.; Hahn, U.; Pattu, V.; Rettig, J. Preparing the Lethal Hit: Interplay Between Exo-And Endocytic Pathways in Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vanderstraeten, A.; Tuyaerts, S.; Amant, F. The Immune System in the Normal Endometrium and Implications for Endometrial Cancer Development. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 109, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, Q.; Feng, X. Advances in Understanding the Immune Imbalance between T-Lymphocyte Subsets and NK Cells in Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018, 78, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sasaki, Y.; Sakai, M.; Miyazaki, S.; Higuma, S.; Shiozaki, A.; Saito, S. Decidual and Peripheral Blood CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells in Early Pregnancy Subjects and Spontaneous Abortion Cases. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 10, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Roberton, S.A.; Care, A.S.; Moldenhauer, L.M. Regulatory T Cells in Embryo Implantation and the Immune Response to Pregnancy. J. Clin. Invest. 2018, 128, 4224–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Alijotas-Reig, J.; Llurba, E.; Gris, J.M. Potentiating Maternal Immune Tolerance in Pregnancy: A New Challenging Role for Regulatory T Cells. Placenta 2014, 35, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Arruvito, L.; Sanz, M.; Banham, A.H.; Fainboim, L. Expansion of CD4+CD25+and FOXP3+Regulatory T Cells During the Follicular Phase of the Menstrual Cycle: Implications for Human Reproduction. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 2572–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kofod, L.; Lindhard, A.; Hviid, T.V.F. Implications of Uterine NK Cells and Regulatory T Cells in the Endometrium of Infertile Women. Hum. Immunol. 2018, 79, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jasper, M.J.; Care, A.S.; Sulivan, B.; Ingman, W.V.; Aplin, J.D.; Robertson, S.A. Macrophage-Derived LIF and IL1B Regulate Alpha(1,2)Fucosyltransferase 2 (Fut2) Expression in Mouse Uterine Epithelial Cells During Early Pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 2011, 84, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Co, E.C.; Gormley, M.; Kapidzic, M.; Rosen, D.B.; Scott, M.A.; Stolp, H.A.; McMaster, M.; Lanier, L.L.; Barcena, A.; Fisher, S.J. Maternal Decidual Macrophages Inhibit NK Cell Killing of Invasive Cytotrophoblasts During Human Pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 88, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manaster, I.; Mandelboim, O. The Unique Properties of Uterine NK Cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fu, B.; Li, X.; Sun, R.; Tong, X.; Ling, B.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. Natural Killer Cells Promote Immune Tolerance by Regulating Inflammatory TH17 Cells at the Human Maternal-Fetal Interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E231–E240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kopcow, H.D.; Rosetti, F.; Leung, Y.; Allan, D.S.; Kutok, J.L.; Strominger, J.L. T Cell Apoptosis at the Maternal-Fetal Interface in Early Human Pregnancy, Involvement of Galectin-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 18472–18477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vacca, P.; Cantoni, C.; Vitale, M.; Prato, C.; Canegallo, F.; Fenoglio, D.; Ragni, N.; Moretta, L.; Mingari, M.C. Crosstalk Between Decidual NK and CD14+Myelomonocytic Cells Results in Induction of Tregs and Immunosuppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11918–11923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hu, X.H.; Tang, M.X.; Mor, G.; Liao, A.H. Tim-3: Expression on Immune Cells and Roles at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 118, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Teles, A.; Schumacher, A.; Kuhnle, M.C.; Linzke, N.; Thuere, C.; Reichardt, P.; Tadokoro, C.E.; Hammerling, G.J.; Zenclussen, A.C. Control of Uterine Microenvironment by foxp3(+) Cells Facilitates Embryo Implantation. Front. Immunol. 2013, 20, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fujiwara, H.; Araki, Y.; Imakawa, K.; Saito, S.; Daikoku, T.; Shigeta, M.; Kanzaki, H.; Mori, T. Dual Positive Regulation of Embryo Implantation by Endocrine and Immune Systems-Step-by-Step Maternal Recognition of the Developing Embryo. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Schjenken, J.E.; Robertson, S.A. Seminal Fluid and Immune Adaptation for Pregnancy-Comparative Biology in Mammalian Species. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014, 49, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hsu, P.; Santner-Nanan, B.; Dahlstrom, J.E.; Fadia, M.; Chandra, A.; Peek, M.; Nanan, R. Altered Decidual DC-SIGN+Antigen-Presenting Cells and Impaired Regulatory T-Cell Induction in Preeclampsia. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 181, 2149–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Blois, S.M.; Kammerer, U.; Alba Soto, C.; Tometten, M.C.; Shaikly, V.; Barrientos, G.; Jurd, R.; Rukavina, D.; Thomson, A.W.; Klapp, B.F.; et al. Dendritic Cells: Key to Fetal Tolerance? Biol. Reprod. 2007, 77, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, S.; Diao, L.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Kwak-Kim, J.Y.H. The Role of Decidual Immune Cells on Human Pregnancy. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 124, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Miyazaki, S.; Tsuda, H.; Sakai, M.; Hori, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Futatani, T.; Miyawaki, T.; Saito, S. Predominance of Th2-Promoting Dendritic Cells in Early Human Pregnancy Decidua. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003, 74, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kennedy, P.R.; Chazara, O.; Gardner, L.; Ivarsson, M.A.; Farrell, L.E.; Xiong, S.; Hiby, S.E.; Colucci, F.; Sharkey, A.M.; Moffett, A. Activating KIR2DS4 Is Expressed by Uterine NK Cells and Contributes to Successful Pregnancy. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 4292–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Sharkey, A.M.; Xiong, S.; Kennedy, P.R.; Gardner, L.; Farrell, L.E.; Chazara, O.; Ivarsson, M.A.; Hiby, S.E.; Colucci, F.; Moffett, A. Tissue-Specific Education of Decidual NK Cells. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 3026–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Rajagopalan, S.; Long, E.O. HLA-G-Mediated NK Cell Senescence Promotes Vascular Remodeling: Implications for Reproduction. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Fournel, S.; Aguerre-Girr, M.; Huc, X.; Lenfant, F.; Alam, A.; Toubert, A.; Bensussan, A.; Le Bouteiller, P. Cutting Edge: Soluble HLA-G1 Triggers CD95/CD95 Ligand-Mediated Apoptosis in Activated CD8+Cells by Interacting with CD8. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 6100–6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mincheva-Nilsson, L.; Baranov, V. Placenta-Derived Exosomes and Syncytiotrophoblast Microparticles and Their Role in Human Reproduction: Immune Modulation for Pregnancy Success. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 72, 440–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gutierrez, G.; Gentile, T.; Miranda, S.; Margni, R.A. Asymmetric antibodies: A Protective Arm in Pregnancy. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 2005, 89, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Mao, G.; Wang, J.; Kang, Y.; Tai, P.; Wen, J.; Zou, Q.; Li, G.; Ouyang, H.; Xia, G.; Wang, B. Progesterone Increases Systemic and Local Uterine Proportions of CD4+CD25+Treg Cells During Midterm Pregnancy in Mice. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 5477–5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Szekeres-Bartho, J.; Sucurovic, S.; Mulac-Jericevic, B. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles and PIBF in Embryo-Maternal Immune-Interactions. Front. Immunol. 2018, 13, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schumacher, A.; Brachwitz, N.; Sohr, S.; Engeland, K.; Langwisch, S.; Dolaptchieva, M.; Alexander, T.; Taran, A.; Malfertheiner, S.F.; Costa, S.D.; et al. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Attracts Regulatory T Cells into the Fetal-Maternal Interface During Early Human Pregnancy. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 5488–5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Faas, M.M.; De Vos, P. Uterine NK Cells and Macrophages in Pregnancy. Placenta 2017, 56, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Houser, B.L.; Tilburgs, T.; Hill, J.; Nicotra, M.L.; Strominger, J.L. Two Unique Human Decidual Macrophage Populations. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 2633–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Bulmer, J.N.; Williams, P.J.; Lash, G.E. Immune Cells in the Placental Bed. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2010, 54, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Djurisic, S.; Hviid, T.V. HLA Class Ib Molecules and Immune Cells in Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ning, F.; Liu, H.; Lash, G.E. The Role of Decidual Macrophages During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Craven, C.M.; Morgan, T.; Ward, K. Decidual Spiral Artery Remodelling Begins Before Cellular Interaction with Cytotrophoblasts. Placenta 1998, 19, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Choudhury, R.H.; Dunk, C.E.; Lye, S.J.; Harris, L.K.; Aplin, J.D.; Jones, R.L. Decidual Leucocytes Infiltrating Human Spiral Arterioles are Rich Source of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Degrade Extracellular Matrix in Vitro and in Situ. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 81, e13054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Smith, S.D.; Dunk, C.E.; Aplin, J.D.; Harris, L.K.; Jones, R.L. Evidence for Immune Cell Involvement in Decidual Spiral Arteriole Remodeling in Early Human Pregnancy. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 1959–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Vivier, E.; Tomasello, E.; Baratin, E.M.; Walzer, T.; Ugolini, S. Functions of Natural Killer Cells. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Moffett-King, A.; Entrican, G.; Ellis, S.; Hutchinson, J.; Bainbridge, D. Natural Killer Cells and Reproduction. TRENDS Immunol. 2002, 23, 332–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Koopman, L.A.; Kopcow, H.D.; Rybalov, B.; Boyson, J.E.; Orange, J.S.; Schatz, F.; Masch, R.; Lockwood, C.J.; Schachter, A.D.; Park, P.J.; et al. Human Decidual Natural Killer Cells are a Unique NK Cell Subset with Immunomodulatory Potential. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 1201–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Giuliani, E.; Parkin, K.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Young, S.L.; Fazleabas, A.T. Characterization of Uterine NK Cells in Women with Infertility or Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Associated Endometriosis. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 72, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Lash, G.E.; Bulmer, J.N.; Li, T.C.; Innes, B.A.; Mariee, N.; Patel, G.; Sanderson, J.; Quenby, S.; Laird, S.M. Standardisation of Uterine Natural Killer (uNK) Cell Measurements in the Endometrium of Women with Recurrent Reproductive Failure. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 116, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Helige, C.; Ahammer, H.; Moser, G.; Hammer, A.; Dohr, G.; Huppertz, B.; Sedlmayr, P. Distribution of Decidual Natural Killer Cells and Macrophages in the Neighbourhood of the Trophoblast Invasion Front: A Quantitative Evaluation. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Smith, G.N.; Croy, B.A. Natural Killer Cell-Triggered Vascular Transformation: Maternal Care Before Birth? Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Moffett, A.; Chazara, O.; Colucci, F. Maternal Allo-Recognition of the Fetus. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 1269–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Moffett, A. NK Cell Allorecognition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Penman, B.S.; Moffett, A.; Chazara, O.; Gupta, S.; Parham, P. Reproduction, Infection and Killer-Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Haplotype Evolution. Immunogenetics 2016, 68, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Arck, P.C.; Hecher, K. Fetomaternal Immune Cross-Talk and its Consequences for Maternal and Offspring’s Health. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Robertson, S.A.; Guerin, L.R.; Bromfield, J.J.; Branson, K.M.; Ahlstrom, A.C.; Care, A.S. Seminal Fluid Drives Expansion of the CD4+CD25+T Regulatory Cell Pool and Induces Tolerance to Paternal Alloantigens in Mice. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 80, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zenclussen, M.L.; Thuere, C.; Ahmad, N.; Wafula, P.O.; Fest, S.; Teles, A.; Leber, A.; Casalis, P.A.; Bechmann, I.; Priller, J.; et al. The Persistence of Paternal Antigens in the Maternal Body is Involved in Regulatory T-Cell Expansion and Fetal-Maternal Tolerance in Murine Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tagliani, E.; Erlebacher, A. Dendritic Cell Function at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Exp. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2011, 7, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sharma, A.; Rudra, D. Emerging Functions of Regulatory T Cells in Tissue Homeostasis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pereira, L.M.S.; Gomes, S.T.M.; Ishak, R.; Vallinoto, A.C.R. Regulatory T Cell and Forkhead Box Protein 3 as Modulators of Immune Homeostasis. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Schumacher, A.; Zenclussen, A.C. Regulatory T Cells: Regulators of Life. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 72, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Guerin, L.R.; Prins, J.R.; Robertson, S.A. Regulatory T-Cells and Immune Tolerance in Pregnancy: A New Target for Infertility Treatment? Hum. Reprod. Update. 2009, 15, 517–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Care, A.S.; Bourque, S.L.; Morton, J.S.; Hjartarson, E.P.; Robertson, S.A.; Davidge, S.T. Reduction in Regulatory T Cells in Early Pregnancy Causes Uterine Artery Dysfunction in Mice. Hypertension 2018, 72, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shima, T.; Sasaky, Y.; Itoh, M.; Nakashima, A.; Ishii, N.; Sugamura, K.; Saito, S. Regulatory T Cells are Necessary for Implantation and Maintenance of Early Pregnancy but not Late Pregnancy in Allogeneic Mice. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 85, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guzman-Genuino, R.M.; Diener, K.R. Regulatory B Cells in Pregnancy: Lessons from Autoimmunity, Graft Tolerance, and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Rolle, L.; Memarzadeh Tehran, M.; Morell-Garcia, A.; Raeva, Y.; Schumacher, A.; Hartig, R.; Costa, S.D.; Jensen, F.; Zenclussen, A.C. Cutting Edge: il-10-Producing Regulatory B Cells in Early Human Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 70, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Schumacher, A. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin as a Pivotal Endocrine Immune Regulator Initiating and Preserving Fetal Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Geisert, R.; Fazleabas, A.; Lucy, M.; Mathew, D. Interaction of the Conceptus and Endometrium to Establish Pregnancy in Mammals: Role of Interleukin 1β. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 349, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rosario, G.X.; Stewart, C.L. The Multifaceted Actions of Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor in Mediating Uterine Receptivity and Embryo Implantation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Lash, G.E.; Ernerudh, J. Decidual Cytokines and Pregnancy Complications: Focus on Spontaneous Miscarriage. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 108, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lindau, R.; Mehta, R.B.; Lash, G.E.; Papapavlou, G.; Boij, R.; Berg, G.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Ernerudh, J.; Svensson-Arvelund, J. Interleukin-34 is Present at the Fetal-Maternal Interface and Induces Immunoregulatory Macrophages of a Decidual Phenotype in Vitro. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Cai, J.Y.; Li, M.J. Interleukin 23 Regulates the Functions of Human Decidual Immune Cells During Early Pregnancy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 469, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Salamonsen, L.A.; Evans, J.; Nguyen, H.P.; Edgell, T.A. The Microenvironment of Human Implantation: Determinant of Reproductive Success. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Lash, G.E. Molecular Cross-Talk at the Feto-Maternal Interface. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a023010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Du, M.R.; Wang, S.C.; Li, D.J. The Integrative Roles of Chemokines at the Maternal-Fetal Interface in Early Pregnancy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cheng, J.; Rosario, G.; Cohen, T.V.; Hu, J.; Stewart, C.L. Tissue-Specific Ablation of the LIF Receptor in the Murine Uterine Epithelium Results in Implantation Failure. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 1916–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Hess, A.P.; Hamilton, A.E.; Talbi Dosiou, C.; Nyegaard, M.; Nayak, N.; Genbecev-Krtolica, O.; Mavrogianis, P.; et al. Decidual Stromal Cell Response to Paracrine Signals from the Trophoblast: Amplification of Immune and Angiogenic Modulators. Biol Reprod. 2007, 76, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Salker, M.; Teklenburg, G.; Molokhia, M.; Lavery, S.; Trew, G.; Aojanepong, T.; Mardon, H.J.; Lokugamage, A.U.; Rai, R.; Landles, C.; et al. Natural Selection of Human Embryos: Impaired Decidualization of Endometrium Disables Embryo-Maternal Interactions and Causes Recurrent Pregnancy loss. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Salker, M.S.; Nautiyal, J.; Steel, J.H.; Webster, Z.; Sucurovic, S.; Nicou, M.; Singh, Y.; Lucas, E.S.; Murakami, K.; Chan, Y.W.; et al. Disordered IL-33/ST2 Activation in Decidualizing Stromal Cells Prolongs Uterine Receptivity in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ticconi, C.; Pietropolli, A.; D’Ippolito, S.; Chiaramonte, C.; Piccione, E.; Scambia, G.; Di Simone, N. Time-To-Pregnancy in Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Controlled Study. Reprod. Sci. (in press).
  125. Wang, W.J.; Hao, C.F.; Lin, Q.D. Dysregulation of Macrophage Activation by Decidual Regulatory T Cells in Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage Patients. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 92, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Clifford, K.; Flanagan, A.M.; Regan, L. Endometrial CD56+Natural Killer Cells in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage: A Histomorphometric Study. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 2727–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Tuckerman, E.; Laird, S.M.; Prakash, A.; Li, T.C. Prognostic Value of the Measurement of Uterine Natural Killer Cells in the Endometrium of Women with Recurrent Miscarriage. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 22, 2208–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Kuon, R.J.; Weber, M.; Heger, J.; Santillan, I.; Vomstein, K.; Bar, C.; Strowitzki, T.; Markert, U.R.; Toth, B. Uterine Natural Killer Cells in Patients with Idiopathic Recurrent Miscarriage. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 78, e12721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. El-Azzamy, H.; Dambaeva, S.V.; Katukurundage, D.; Salazar Garcia, M.D.; Skariah, A.; Hussein, Y.; Germain, A.; Fernandez, E.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Beaman, K.D.; et al. Dysregulated Uterine Natural Killer Cells and Vascular Remodeling in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Losses. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e13024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Seshadri, S.; Sunkara, S.K. Natural Killer Cells in Female Infertility and Recurrent Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kuon, R.J.; Vomstein, K.; Weber, M.; Muller, F.; Seitz, C.; Wallwiener, S.; Strowitzki, T.; Schleussner, E.; Markert, U.R.; Daniel, V.; et al. The “Killer Cell Story” in Recurrent Miscarriage: Association Between Activated Peripheral Lymphocytes and Uterine Natural Killer Cells. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 119, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Michimata, T.; Ogasawara, M.S.; Tsuda, H.; Suzumori, K.; Aoki, K.; Sakai, M.; Fujimura, M.; Nagata, K.; Nakamura, M.; Saito, S. Distributions of Endometrial NK Cells, B Cells, T Cells, and Th2/Tc2 Cells Fail to Predict Pregnancy Outcome Following Recurrent Abortion. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2002, 47, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. LaChapelle, M.H.; Miron, P.; Hemmings, R.; Roy, D.C. Endometrial T, B, and NK Cells in Patients with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Altered Profile and Pregnancy Outcome. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 4027–4034. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Fuchinoue, K.; Fukui, A.; Chiba, H.; Kamoi, M.; Funamizu, A.; Taima, A.; Fukuhara, R.; Mizunuma, H. Expression of Retinoid-Related Orphan Receptor (ROR)γt on NK22 Cells in the Peripheral Blood and Uterine Endometrium of Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Unexplained Infertility. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2016, 42, 1541–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Kwak-Kim, J.; Yang, K.M.; Gilman-Sachs, A. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Disease of Inflammation and Coagulation. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2009, 35, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kamoi, M.; Fukui, A.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Fuchinoue, K.; Funamizu, A.; Chiba, H.; Yokota, M.; Fukuhara, R.; Mizunuma, H. NK22 Cells in the Uterine Mid-Secretory Endometrium and Peripheral Blood of Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Unexplained Infertility. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 73, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fukui, A.; Kamoi, M.; Funamizu, A.; Fuchinoue, K.; Chiba, H.; Yokota, M.; Fukuhara, R.; Mizunuma, H. NK Cell Abnormality and its Treatment in Women with Reproductive Failures Such as Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Implantation Failures, Preeclampsia, and Pelvic Endometriosis. Reprod Med. Biol. 2015, 14, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. O’Hern Perfetto, C.; Fan, X.; Dahl, S.; Krieg, S.; Westphal, L.M.; Bunker Lathi, R.; Nayak, N.R. Expression of Interleukin-22 in Decidua of Patients with Early pRegnancy and Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2015, 32, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Peng, D.; Xi, W.; Jia, L.; Cui-Yan, Y.; Jing, Y.; Lan-Rong, L.; Qiao-Fei, H.; Jian, L. Simultaneous Detection of Decidual Th1/Th2 and NK1/NK2 Immunophenotyping in Unknown Recurrent Miscarriage Using 8-Color Flow Cytometry with FSC/Vt Extended Strategy. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37, BSR20170150. [Google Scholar]
  140. Tang, A.W.; Alfirevic, Z.; Quenby, S. Natural Killer Cells and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage and Infertility: A Systematic Review. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 1971–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fukui, A.; Funamizu, A.; Yokota, M.; Yamada, K.; Nakamua, R.; Fukuhara, R.; Kimura, H.; Mizunuma, H. Uterine and Circulating Natural Killer Cells and Their Roles in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Implantation Failure and Preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 90, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ali, S.B.; Jeelall, Y.; Pennell, C.E.; Hart, R.; McLean-Tooke, A.; Lucas, M. The Role of Immunological Testing and Intervention in Reproductive Medicine: A Fertile Collaboration? Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 79, e12784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Lee, S.K.; Na, B.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Hur, S.E.; Lee, M.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Kwak-Kim, J. Determination of Clinical Cellular Immune Markers in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 70, 398–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Azargoon, A.; Mirrasouli, Y.; Shokrollahi Barough, M.; Barati, M.; Kokhaei, P. The State of Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cells and Cytotoxicity in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Unexplained Infertility. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 13, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  145. Davies, M.L.; Dambaeva, S.V.; Katukurundage, D.; Repak, M.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Beaman, K.D. Predicting NK Cell Subsets Using Gene Expression Levels in Peripheral Blood and Endometrial Biopsy Specimens. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 78, e12730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Moffett, A.; Colucci, F. Uterine NK Cells: Active Regulators at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. J. Clin. Invest. 2014, 124, 1872–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Hong, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, P.; Song, Y.; Lin, Q. Killer Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Repertoire on Uterine Natural Killer Cell Subsets in Women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 140, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wang, S.; Li, Y.P.; Ding, B.; Zhao, Y.R.; Chen, Z.J.; Xu, C.Y. Recurrent Miscarriage is Associated with a Decline of Decidual Natural Killer Cells Expressing Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors Specific for Human Leukocyte Antigen C. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2014, 40, 1288–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Quenby, S.; Nik, H.; Innes, B.; Lash, G.; Turner, M.; Drury, J.; Bulmer, J. Uterine Natural Killer Cells and Angiogenesis in Recurrent Reproductive Failure. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 24, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fukui, A.; Ntrivalas, E.; Fukuhara, R.; Fujii, S.; Mizunuma, H.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Beaman, K.; Kwak-Kim, J. Correlation Between Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors and Intracellular Cytokine Expression of Peripheral Blood NK Cells in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Losses and Implantation Failures. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2009, 62, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Fukui, A.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Ntrivalas, E.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Lee, S.K.; Beaman, K. Intracellular Cytokine Expression of Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cell Subsets in Women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions and Implantation Failures. Fertil. Steril. 2008, 89, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Plaks, V.; Birnberg, T.; Berkutzki, T.; Sela, S.; BenYashar, A.; Kalchenko, V.; Mor, G.; Keshet, E.; Dekel, N.; Neeman, M.; et al. Uterine DCs are Crucial for Decidua Formation During Embryo Implantation in Mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2008, 118, 3954–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Huang, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, X.; Diao, L.; Lian, R.; Zhang, X.; Hu, L.; Zeng, Y. Association of Peripheral Blood Dendritic Cells with Recurrent Pregnancy loss: A Case-Controlled Study. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 76, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Askelund, K.; Liddell, H.S.; Zanderigo, A.M.; Fernando, N.S.; Khong, T.Y.; Stone, P.R.; Chamley, L.W. CD83(+)Dendritic Cells in the Decidua of Women with Recurrent Miscarriage and Normal Pregnancy. Placenta 2004, 25, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Qian, Z.D.; Huang, L.L.; Zhu, X.M. An Immunohistochemical Study of CD83-And CD1a-Positive Dendritic Cells in the Decidua of Women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2015, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Liu, S.; Wei, H.; Li, Y.; Huang, C.; Lian, R.; Xu, J.; Chen, L.; Zeng, Y. Downregulation of ILT4+ Dendritic Cells in Recurrent Miscarriage and Recurrent Implantation Failure. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e12998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Aluvihare, V.R.; Kallikourdis, M.; Betz, A.G. Regulatory T Cells Mediate Maternal Tolerance to the Fetus. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Darrasse-Jeze, G.; Darasse-Jeze, G.; Klatzmann, D.; Charlotte, F.; Salomon, B.L.; Cohen, J.L. CD4+CD25+Regulatory/Suppressor T Cells Prevent Allogeneic Fetus Rejection in Mice. Immunol. Lett. 2006, 102, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zenclussen, A.C.; Gerlof, K.; Zenclussen, M.L.; Sollwedel, A.; Bertoja, A.Z.; Ritter, T.; Kotsch, K.; Leber, J.; Volk, H.D. Abnormal T-Cell Reactivity Against Paternal Antigens in Spontaneous Abortion: Adoptive Transfer of Pregnancy-Induced CD4+CD25+T Regulatory Cells Prevents fetal Rejection in a Murine Abortion Model. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 166, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wang, W.J.; Liu, F.J.; Liu, X.; Hao, C.F.; Bao, H.C.; Qu, Q.L.; Liu, X.M. Adoptive Transfer of Pregnancy-Induced CD4+CD25+Regulatory T Cells Reverses the Increase in Abortion Rate Caused by Interleukin 17 in the CBA/JxBALB/c Mouse Model. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Samstein, R.M.; Josefowicz, S.Z.; Arvey, A.; Treuting, P.M.; Rudensky, A.Y. Extrathymic Generation of Regulatory T Cells in Placental Mammals Mitigates Maternal-Fetal Conflict. Cell 2012, 150, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Liu, Y.S.; Wu, L.; Tong, X.H.; Wu, L.M.; He, G.P.; Zhou, G.X.; Luo, L.H.; Luan, H.B. Study on the Relationship Between Th17 Cells and Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 65, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhang, X.X.; Kang, X.M.; Zhao, A.M. Regulation of CD4+FOXP3+T Cells by CCL20/CCR6 Axis in Early Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage Patients. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 9145–9154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Wu, M.; Liu, P.; Cheng, L. Galectin-1 Reduction and Changes in T Regulatory Cells May Play Crucial Roles in Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 1973–1978. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  165. Inada, K.; Shima, T.; Ito, M.; Ushijima, A.; Saito, S. Helios-Positive Functional Regulatory T Cells are Decreased in Decidua of Miscarriage Cases with Normal Fetal Chromosomal Content. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 107, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Qian, J.; Zhang, N.; Lin, J.; Wang, C.; Pan, X.; Chen, L.; Li, D.; Wang, L. Distinct Pattern of Th17/Treg Cells in Pregnant Women with a History of Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Biosci. Trends 2018, 12, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wang, W.J.; Hao, C.F.; Lin, Y.; Yin, G.J.; Bao, S.H.; Qui, L.H.; Lin, Q.D. Increased Prevalence of T Helper 17 (Th17) Cells in Peripheral Blood and Decidua in Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion Patients. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 84, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Saifi, B.; Rezaee, S.A.; Tajik, N.; Ahmadpour, M.E.; Ashrafi, M.; Vakili, R.; SoleimaniAsl, S.; Aflatoonian, R.; Mehdizadeh, M. Th17 Cells and Related Cytokines in Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage at the Implantation Window. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2014, 29, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Lee, S.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Hur, S.E.; Kim, C.J.; Na, B.J.; Lee, M.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Kwak-Kim, J. An Imbalance in Interleukin-17-Producing T and Foxp3⁺ Regulatory T Cells in Women with Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 2964–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wu, L.; Li, J.; Xu, H.L.; Xu, B.; Tong, X.H.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Liu, Y.S. IL-7/IL-7R Signaling Pathway Might Play a Role in Recurrent Pregnancy Losses by Increasing Inflammatory Th17 Cells and Decreasing Treg Cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 76, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Figueiredo, A.S.; Schumacher, A. The T Helper Type 17/Regulatory T Cell Paradigm in Pregnancy. Immunology 2016, 148, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Saxena, D.; Misra, M.K.; Parveen, F.; Phadke, S.R.; Agrawal, S. The Transcription Factor Forkhead Box P3 Gene Variants Affect Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Placenta 2015, 36, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zidan, H.E.; Abdul-Maksoud, R.S.; Mowafy, H.E.; Elsayed, W.S.H. The Association of IL-33 and Foxp3 Gene Polymorphisms with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Egyptian Women. Cytokine 2018, 108, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Elkord, E.; Abd Al Samid, M.; Chaudhary, B. Helios, and not FoxP3, is the Marker of Activated Tregs Expressing GARP/LAP. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 20026–20036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Sadlon, T.; Brown, C.Y.; Bandara, V.; Hope, C.M.; Schjenken, J.E.; Pederson, S.M.; Breen, J.; Forrest, A.; Beyer, M.; Robertson, S.; et al. Unravelling the Molecular Basis for Regulatory T-Cell Plasticity and Loss of Function in Disease. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2018, 7, e1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Xu, L.; Qiu, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, W. Expression of C-Type Lectin Receptors and Toll-Like Receptors in Decidua of Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2017, 29, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Bao, S.H.; Wang, X.P.; De Lin, Q.; Wang, W.J.; Yin, G.J.; Qiu, L.H. Decidual CD4+CD25+CD127dim/- Regulatory T Cells in Patients with Unexplained Recurrentspontaneous Miscarriage. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011, 155, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Yuan, J.; Li, J.; Huang, S.Y.; Sun, X. Characterization of the Subsets of Human NKT-Like Cells and the Expression of Th1/Th2 Cytokines in Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 110, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Piccinni, M.P.; Beloni, L.; Livi, C.; Maggi, E.; Scarselli, G.; Romagnani, S. Defective Production of Both Leukemia Inhibitory Factor and Type 2 T-Helper Cytokines by Decidual T Cells in Unexplained Recurrent Abortions. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 1020–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Vives, A.; Balasch, J.; Yague, J.; Quinto, L.; Ordi, J.; Vanrell, J.A. Type-1 and type-2 Cytokines in Human Decidual Tissue and Trophoblasts from Normal and Abnormal Pregnancies Detected by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1999, 42, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Comba, C.; Bastu, E.; Dural, O.; Yasa, C.; Keskin, G.; Ozsurmeli, M.; Buyru, F.; Serdaroglu, H. Role of Inflammatory Mediators in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bates, M.D.; Quenby, S.; Takakuwa, K.; Johnson, P.M.; Vince, G.S. Aberrant Cytokine Production by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss? Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 2439–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Daher, S.; De Arruda Geraldes Denardi, K.; Blotta, M.H.; Mamoni, R.L.; Reck, A.P.; Camano, L.; Mattar, R. Cytokines in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2004, 62, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Talukdar, A.; Rai, R.; Aparna Sharma, K.; Rao, D.N.; Sharma, A. Peripheral Gamma Delta T Cells Secrete Inflammatory Cytokines in Women with Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Cytokine 2018, 102, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Bombell, S.; McGuire, W. Cytokine Polymorphisms in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Meta-Analysis. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008, 48, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Zhang, M.; Xu, J.; Bao, X.; Niu, W.; Wang, L.; Du, L.; Zhang, N.; Sun, Y. Association Between Genetic Polymorphisms in Interleukin Genes and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Grimstad, F.; Krieg, S. Immunogenetic Contributions to Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016, 33, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Krieg, S.A.; Fan, X.; Hong, Y.; Sang, Q.X.; Giaccia, A.; Westphal, L.M.; Lathi, R.B.; Krieg, A.J.; Nayak, N.R. Global Alteration in Gene Expression Profiles of Deciduas from Women with Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 189, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Jasper, M.J.; Tremellen, K.P.; Robertson, S.A. Reduced Expression of IL-6 and IL-1alpha mRNAs in Secretory Phase Endometrium of Women with Recurrent Miscarriage. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2007, 73, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. D’Ippolito, S.; Tersigni, C.; Marana, R.; Di Nicuolo, F.; Gaglione, R.; Rossi, E.D.; Castellani, R.; Scambia, G.; Di Simone, N. Inflammosome in the Human Endometrium: Further Step in the Evaluation of the “Maternal Side”. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Von Wolff, M.; Thaler, C.J.; Strowitzki, T.; Broome, J.; Stolz, W.; Tabibzadeh, S. Regulated Expression of Cytokines in Human Endometrium Throughout the Menstrual Cycle: Dysregulation in Habitual Abortion. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 6, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Wang, W.J.; Liu, F.J.; Qu, H.M.; Hao, C.F.; Qu, Q.L.; Xiong, W.; Bao, H.C.; Wang, X.R. Regulation of the Expression of Th17 Cells and Regulatory T Cells by IL-27 in Patients with Unexplained Early Recurrent Miscarriage. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 99, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Karaer, A.; Cigremis, Y.; Celik, E.; Urhan Gonullu, R. Prokineticin 1 and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor mRNA Expression in the Endometrium of Women with Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 102, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Brezina, P.R.; Kutteh, W.H. Classic and Cutting Edge Strategies for the Management of Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North. Am. 2014, 41, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Christiansen, O.B.; Kolte, A.M.; Krog, M.C.; Nielsen, H.S.; Egerup, P. Treatment with Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: An Update. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 133, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Crawford, G.; Ray, A.; Gudi, A.; Shah, A.; Homburg, R. The Role of Seminal Plasma for Improved Outcomes During in Vitro Fertilization Treatment: Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Wang, W.J.; Liu, F.J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.M.; Qu, Q.L.; Li, F.H.; Zhuang, L.L.; Li, X.X.; Hao, C.F. Periodic Elevation of Regulatory T Cells on the Day of Embryo Transfer is Associated with Better in Vitro Fertilization Outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 119, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Ata, B.; Abou-Setta, A.M.; Seyhan, A.; Buckett, W. Application of Seminal Plasma to Female Genital Tract Prior to Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles (IVF, ICSI and Frozen Embryo Transfer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 28, CD011809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Bouet, P.E.; El Hachem, H.; Monceau, E.; Gariepy, G.; Kadoch, I.J.; Sylvestre, C. Chronic Endometritis in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure: Prevalence and Role of Office Hysteroscopy and Immunohistochemistry in Diagnosis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Kitaya, K. Prevalence of Chronic Endometritis in Recurrent Miscarriages. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 1156–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. McQueen, D.B.; Perfetto, C.O.; Hazard, F.K.; Lathi, R.B. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Chronic Endometritis and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Wu, D.; Kimura, F.; Zheng, L.; Ishida, M.; Niwa, Y.; Hirata, K.; Takebayashi, A.; Takashima, A.; Zhang, G.; Murakami, T. Chronic Endometritis Modifies Decidualization in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Cicinelli, E.; Matteo, M.; Tinelli, R.; Pinto, V.; Marinaccio, M.; Indraccolo, U.; De Ziegler, D.; Resta, L. Chronic Endometritis Due to Common Bacteria is Prevalent in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage as Confirmed by Improved Pregnancy Outcome after Antibiotic Treatment. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 21, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 05332 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the changes occurring in the human endometrium and in local immune cell trafficking in the normal state and in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). (a) Endometrium in the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle in the absence of the embryo; (b) endometrium in the presence of a normally implanting embryo; (c) endometrial immune derangements in RPL. M: macrophages; uNK: uterine natural killer cell; iDC: immature uterine dendritic cell; mDC: mature uterine dendritic cell; N: neutrophil granulocyte; Treg: regulatory T cell; MC: mastocyte; Teff: effector T cells; ESC: endometrial stromal cell; BV: blood vessel.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the changes occurring in the human endometrium and in local immune cell trafficking in the normal state and in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). (a) Endometrium in the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle in the absence of the embryo; (b) endometrium in the presence of a normally implanting embryo; (c) endometrial immune derangements in RPL. M: macrophages; uNK: uterine natural killer cell; iDC: immature uterine dendritic cell; mDC: mature uterine dendritic cell; N: neutrophil granulocyte; Treg: regulatory T cell; MC: mastocyte; Teff: effector T cells; ESC: endometrial stromal cell; BV: blood vessel.
Ijms 20 05332 g001
Table
Table 1. Simplified summary of the major changes characterizing the decidualization of the endometrium.
Table 1. Simplified summary of the major changes characterizing the decidualization of the endometrium.
Morphological (Tissutal and Cell) Changes
Secretory transformation of endometrial glands, compaction of surface epithelial cells, stromal edema, stromal cell proliferation, differentiation of fibroblast-like stromal cells into epithelioid-like cells, massive leukocyte infiltration (mainly uterine natural killer cells and mast cells), spiral arteries remodeling
Extracellular Matrix Changes
Increased production by decidualized stromal cells of collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin, decorin, heparan-sulphate proteoglycans, IGFBP-1, PRL, LEFTY-2, αvβ3 integrin, osteopontin
Changes in the Expression of Genes Involved in the Following Cellular Functions
Cell cycle regulation, cytoskeleton remodeling, oxidative stress response, ion and water transport, response to steroid hormone, deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM), modulation of transcription, epigenetic patterning, post-translation modification, growth factor, angiogenesis, cytokine and chemokine signaling, immune modulation
Cell Signaling and Pathways Involved in the Decidualization
cAMP/PKA pathway, progesterone signaling pathway, Nodal pathway, Notch signaling pathway, ERK1/2 pathway, WNT/β-catenin pathway, cSRC pathway, JAK-STAT pathway, lipid signaling (endocannabinoid system), TGFβ signaling pathway, BMP2-WNT4 signaling cascade, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway, Ras/Raf1/MAPK pathway, EPAC1 and EPAC2 signaling
LEFTY-2: left-right determination factor 2; IGFBP-1: insulin like growth factor binding protein-1; PRL: prolactin; cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PKA: protein kinase A; ERK1/2: extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2; JAK: Janus kinase; STAT: signal transducer and activator of transcription; TGFβ: transforming growth factor-β; BMP-2: bone morphogenetic protein-2; AKT: protein kinase B; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; EPAC1 and 2: exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 1 and 2.
Table
Table 2. Overview of the relevant cells of the innate immune system in the endometrium and decidua with their major reproductive functions.
Table 2. Overview of the relevant cells of the innate immune system in the endometrium and decidua with their major reproductive functions.
Cell TypePhenotypeDensity (%) of Leukocyte Population in the EndometriumChanges during the Menstrual Cycle and in Early PregnancyPreferential Location in the EndometriumRelevant Molecules SecretedSuggested FunctionsReferences
Uterine Natural killer Cells (uNK)CD3−CD56brightCD16−
(predominant phenotype)		30%–40% of stromal cells
70% of endometrial leukocytes in the late luteal phase (LP) and in early pregnancy		Progressively increase from the follicular phase (FP) to the LP. Maximal density in late LP and in gestational deciduaSurround the arteries and the glandsIFN-γ, VEGF, PlGF, TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-10, GM-CSF, IL-1β, LIF, CSF-1, AP-2Tissue (spiral arteries) remodeling, enhancement of angiogenesis, control of trophoblast invasion[10,20,24,25,26,27,28,29]
Macrophages
(Mφ)		CD68+20%–25% of total leukocytes in the deciduaProgressively increase from the FP to the LP. Maximal density before menstruation and in pregnancy.
Acquire tolerogenic phenotype		Scattered throughout the endometrium; preferentially found around the glands and at implantation siteTGF-β, IL-10, IDO, PGE2Involved in corpus luteum maintenance, blastocyst implantation, spiral arteries remodeling, control of trophoblast invasion, protection of the fetus against intrauterine infection[20,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]
Mast Cells
(MCs)		MCT; MCTC; MCC
(endometrial MCs)		3%–5% of total endometrial cells;Unchanged throughout menstrual cycle; changes in phenotype during the menstrual cycle; activated in the early and midluteal phase More prominent in the basal endometrial compartmentVEGFInitiation of menstruation Enhance tissue and spiral artery remodeling, support implantation and angiogenesis[20,36,37]
Uterine
Dendritic Cells (DCs)		CD1a+ (immature, tolerogenic DCs);
CD83+ (mature DCs)		Density of immature DCs in the endometrium is higher than that of mature DCs;
DC 1%–2% of the immune cells in the decidua		Immature DCs increase from FP to LP; peak in the menstrual phase (controversial finding);
No changes in mature DCs with the menstrual cycle		Both mature and immature DCs are found mainly in the basal layer of the endometrium in the LP;
Scattered through the gestational decidua
In mice grouped in cluster-like structures		TGF-β, IL-10, IDOInvolved in the maternal acceptance of the embryo, trophoblast invasion and differentiation;
Uterine remodeling, angiogenesis;
Determine the differentiation of T cell progenitors into Tregs and expansion and activation of Tregs		[29,33,38,39,40,41,42,43]
Neutrophil (N) GranulocytesCD11b+; CD16b+; CD66c+1% to 6%–15% of endometrial cellsConsiderably increase in the late (premenstrual) LPEndometrial StromaCCL2, CXCL8, TNF-α, IL-6, VEGFMenstruation, tissue breakdown and repair, Proangiogenic and tolerogenic in the pregnant decidua[44,45,46,47]
Table
Table 3. Overview of the cells of the adaptive immune system in the endometrium and decidua with their major reproductive functions.
Table 3. Overview of the cells of the adaptive immune system in the endometrium and decidua with their major reproductive functions.
Cell TypePhenotypeDensity (%) of Leukocyte (CD45+) Population in the EndometriumChanges during the Menstrual Cycle and in Early PregnancyPreferential Location in the EndometriumRelevant Molecules SecretedSuggested FunctionsReferences
BLymphocytesCD45+ CD19+0.2%–4.5%Very slight increase in late LPClusters among stromal cells in the perimenstrual periodIL-10Still undetermined;
Potentially implicated in early pregnancy		[20,47,48]
T LymphocytesCD45+ CD3+1%–2% to 28%Reportedly decreased or unchanged from follicular phase (FP) to luteal phase (LP)Lymphoid aggregates;
scattered throughout epithelium and stroma		Variable according to the specific cell subsetProtective or harmful for the embryo according to the specific cell subset[24,29,48,49]
T Helper Lymphocytes
(Th1, Th2, Th17, Tregs)		CD45+ CD3+ CD4+3.8%–21.4%No clear variations reportedPresent in uterine mucosa as unique aggregates surrounding a B cell coreTNF-α and IFN-γ (by Th1);
IL-4 (by Th2);
IL-8 (by Th17) 		Th1 produce inflammatory cytokines;
Th2 produce anti-inflammatory cytokines;
Th17 has pro-inflammatory effects (for Tregs see the dedicated section in the table)		[33,48,50]
T Cytotoxic LymphocytesCD45+ CD3+ CD8+4.4%–34.5% to 66%Significantly decrease from FP to LPLymphoid aggregatesRelease cytotoxic substances (granzymes, perforin)Potentially harmful to the embryo. Blocked in successful pregnancy[47,48,49,51]
TregsCD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+Not clearly defined in humansExpansion in preimplantation endometrium;
Increase in the decidua at implantation site and in early pregnancy until midgestation		Insufficient data in human preimplantation endometriumGalectin-1, TGF-β, IL-10, HO-1 Essential in the control of an excessive maternal inflammatory response at the implantation site;
Involved in maternal immune tolerance to fetal allograft particularly in early pregnancy;
Block maternal effector T cells
Involved in the regulation of maternal vascular remodeling		[20,33,49,50,52,53,54,55,56,57]
CD: cluster of differentiation; FP: follicular phase; LP: luteal phase; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PlGF: placental growth factor; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-10: interleukin-10; GM-CSF: granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor; IL-1β: interleukin-1β; LIF: leukemia inhibitory factor; CSF-1: colony-stimulating factor 1; AP-2: endocytic adaptor protein 2; IDO: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; PGE2: prostaglandin E2; CCL2: chemokine C-C motif ligand 2; CXCL8: C-X-C motif ligand 8; IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-4: interleukin-4; IL-8: interleukin-8; HO-1: heme oxygenase-1.
Table
Table 4. Proposed major mechanisms underlying maternal immune tolerance towards the embryo in normal pregnancy in the endometrium and decidua.
Table 4. Proposed major mechanisms underlying maternal immune tolerance towards the embryo in normal pregnancy in the endometrium and decidua.
MechanismEffectReferences
Increased secretion of LIF and IL-1β by uterine macrophagesEnhancement of embryo attachment to endometrial epithelium[58]
TGFβ production by maternal decidual macrophagesSuppression of EVT rejection mediated by NK cells [59]
Production by macrophages of TGFβ, IL-10, IDO, and PGE2Immunoinhibitory and pro-tolerance actions[33]
Specific characteristics of uNK cells in the endometrium and of dNK in pregnancyAcquisition of a regulatory role rather than classic cell killing ability[21,27,60]
dNK cells dampen Th17 cells through the production of IFNSuppress Th17-induced inflammatory response[61]
Galectin-1 production by dNK cellsInduces apoptosis of activated CD8+ T cells[62,63,64]
Endometrial recruitment of innate immune cells (Mφ, DCs, and granulocytes) triggered by seminal fluid before implantationActivation and expansion of Tregs which, in turn, creates a uterine microenvironment favorable for embryo implantation and enhances maternal tolerance towards paternal MHC antigens[21,54,65,66,67]
Induction and expansion of tolerogenic DCs phenotypeInvolved in the control and activation of Tregs[33,54,68,69]
Reduced production of IL-12 by DCsPriming of decidual CD4+ cells into a Th2 phenotype[70,71]
EVT cells express HLA-C, HLA-E, and HLA-G but not HLA-A and HLA-B
Lack of expression of MHC molecules by syncytiotrophoblasts 		Inhibition of cytolytic activity of dNK cells against the trophoblasts
Induction of NK senscence-Enhanced apoptosis of activated CD8+ cells		[70,72,73,74,75]
Trophoblast production of exosomesDownregulation of maternal immunity towards the trophoblast[76]
Development of a specific cytokine and chemokine network in the endometrium and deciduaAchievement of a correct immune cell recruitment and dialogue favoring embryo implantation and proper pregnancy evolution [77]
Presence of asymmetric maternal Abs against paternal antigensBind trophoblast but are unable to trigger destructive immune response[78]
Increased production of PIBF Upregulation of Th2 cytokines production. Downregulation of dNK activity. Increase the production of Glycodelin A which induces apoptosis in T cells. These effects can contribute to trophoblast immune protection[66,79]
Increased progesterone production in LP and in pregnancyExpansion of Tregs and enhancement of their immunosuppressive actions[33,78]
hCG production by syncytiotrophoblastRecruitment of Tregs at the maternal–fetal interface[80]
EVT: extravillous trophoblast; HLA: human leukocyte antigen; MHC: major histocompatibility complex; Mφ: macrophages; DC: dendritic cells; PIBF: progesterone induced blocking factor; LP: luteal phase; hCG: human chorionic gonadotropin; Abs: asymmetric antibodies.
Table
Table 5. Summary of the major changes observed in cytokine expression/levels in the endometrium and decidua in women with RPL compared with normal women.
Table 5. Summary of the major changes observed in cytokine expression/levels in the endometrium and decidua in women with RPL compared with normal women.
CytokineTissue/CellsType of VariationExpression/ProductionMethods of DetectionReferences
IL-1 (α and β)DeciduaDecreaseIL-1 pathway gene expressionMicroarray[188]
IL-1αEndometriumDecreasemRNA expressionRT-PCR[189]
IL-1βEndometrium
Endometrium		Increase
Decrease		Tissue secretion
mRNA expression		ELISA
RNase protection assay		[190]
[191]
IL-2DeciduaIncreaseCytokine productionELISA[176]
IL-4Decidua
Decidual T cells		Decrease
Decrease		mRNA and protein expression
Cytokine production		ELISA + RT-PCR
ELISA		[178]
[179]
IL-6Decidua
Endometrium
Endometrium		Increase
Decrease
Decrease		mRNA and protein expression
mRNA expression
mRNA expression		RT-PCR
RT-PCR
RNase protection assay		[166]
[189]
[191]
IL-7Decidual stromal cellsIncreaseCytokine expressionIHC[170]
IL-8DeciduaIncreaseIL-8 pathway gene expressionMicroarray[188]
IL-10Decidua
Decidua
Decidua
Decidual Tregs
Decidual T cells		Decrease
Decrease
Decrease
Decrease
Decrease		mRNA and protein expression
Cytokine production
Protein expression
Cytokine expression
Cytokine production		ELISA + RT-PCR
ELISA
RT-PCT
Flow cytometry
ELISA		[178]
[176]
[180]
[177]
[179]
IL-12EndometriumIncreaseTissue levelsELISA[181]
IL-17Decidua
Decidua		Unchanged
Increase		mRNA and protein expression
mRNA and protein expression		qRT-PCR + IHC +WB
RT-PCR + WB		[138]
[167]
IL-18Endometrium
Endometrium		Increase
Increase		Tissue levels
Tissue secretion		ELISA
ELISA		[181]
[190]
IL-22DeciduaDecreasemRNA and protein expressionqRT-PCR + IHC +WB[138]
IL-23Decidua
Decidua		Unchanged
Increase		mRNA and protein expression
mRNA and protein expression		qRT-PCR + IHC +WB
RT-PCR + WB		[138]
[167]
IL-27DeciduaDecreasemRNA and protein expressionqRT-PCR + WB[192]
TGF-βDecidual TregsDecreaseCytokine expressionFlow cytometry[177]
TGF-β1Decidua
Decidua		Decrease
Decrease		mRNA and protein expression
Cytokine production		RT-PCR + ELISA
ELISA		[166]
[176]
IFN-γEndometrium
Decidua
Decidua		Increase
Increase
Increase		Tissue levels
Cytokine production
mRNA and protein expression		ELISA
ELISA
RT-PCR + ELISA		[181]
[176]
[178]
TNF-αDeciduaIncreasemRNA and protein expressionRT-PCR + ELISA[166]
LIFEndometrium
Endometrium
Decidual T cells		Decrease
Increase
Decrease		Tissue levels
mRNA expression
Cytokine production		ELISA
RT-PCR
ELISA		[181]
[193]
[179]
MIFEndometrium
Decidual T cells		Decrease
Decrease		Tissue levels
Cytokine production		ELISA
ELISA		[181]
[179]
IL-2: interleukin-2; IL-4: interleukin-4; IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-7: interleukin-7; IL-8: interleukin-8; IL-12: interleukin-12; IL-17: interleukin-17; IL-18: interleukin-18; IL-22: interleukin-22; IL-23: interleukin-23; IL-27: interleukin-27; MIF: macrophage migration inhibitory factor.
Table
Table 6. Summary of the suggested major immunologic alterations in the endometrium and potential pathogenetic mechanisms leading to RPL.
Table 6. Summary of the suggested major immunologic alterations in the endometrium and potential pathogenetic mechanisms leading to RPL.
Suggested AlterationPotential Pathogenetic Mechanism(s)
Abnormal decidualization of the ESCAltered control of the local trafficking of immune cells by ESC;
Altered modulation of the inflammatory response to the implanting embryo;
Dysregulation in cytokine production
Abnormal killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIR)–uNK interactionAbolished or reduced prevention of the maternal immune rejection of the conceptus
Increased toxicity of uNKImpaired capacity to limit T cell cytotoxicity;
Potential toxicity toward the cytotrophoblast;
Abnormal cytokine production;
Defective remodeling of the spiral arteries
Abnormal number/function of endometrial/decidual TregsLack of inhibition of Th1 and Th17 cells;
Defective/absent resolution of the inflammatory reaction consequent to initial embryo implantation;
Reduction or abolition of the maternal immunologic tolerance toward the fetus;
Defective remodeling of the spiral arteries
Limited differentiation of macrophages toward the M2 immunophenotypeReduced production of tolerogenic cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β)
Lack of immature dendritic cellsLack of the expansion of Treg population
Activation of lymphocytes T effectorImmune attack to the trophoblast
Aberrant local cytokine networkDevelopment of a local immunomodulatory environment unfavorable to maternal tolerance toward the conceptus

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ticconi, C.; Pietropolli, A.; Di Simone, N.; Piccione, E.; Fazleabas, A. Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215332

AMA Style

Ticconi C, Pietropolli A, Di Simone N, Piccione E, Fazleabas A. Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(21):5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ticconi, Carlo, Adalgisa Pietropolli, Nicoletta Di Simone, Emilio Piccione, and Asgerally Fazleabas. 2019. "Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 21: 5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop