Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Easy and Fast Obtention of ZnO by Thermal Decomposition of Zinc Acetate and Its Photocatalytic Properties over Rhodamine B Dye
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Multifunctional Symmetrical Squaraine Dyes for Molecular Photovoltaics by Terminal Alkyl Chain Modifications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solid-State Luminescence with a Large Stokes Shift in Starch Functionalized with Low-Content ESIPT Dye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multimode Detection Platform for Biothiols Using BODIPY Dye-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles

by
Panangattukara Prabhakaran Praveen Kumar
1,2
1
KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Submission received: 26 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 6 August 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Colorant Chemistry)

Abstract

:
This study explored the synthesis and application of BODIPY-functionalized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) for the sensitive detection of biothiols via an indicator displacement assay coupled with surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) techniques, alongside their efficacy for in vitro cancer cell imaging. Moreover, the assay allowed for the visible colorimetric detection of biothiols under normal and ultraviolet light conditions. The BODIPY (boron-dipyrromethene) fluorophores were strategically conjugated to the surface of gold nanoparticles, forming a robust nanohybrid that leverages the plasmonic properties of AuNPs for enhanced spectroscopic sensitivity. The detection mechanism exploited the displacement of the BODIPY indicator upon interaction with biothiols, triggering a measurable change in fluorescence and SERS signals. This dual-mode sensing approach provides high selectivity and sensitivity for biothiol detection, with detection limits reaching nanomolar concentrations using fluorescence and femtomolar concentration for cysteine using SERS. Furthermore, the BODIPY-AuNP complexes demonstrated excellent biocompatibility and photostability, facilitating their use in the fluorescence imaging of biothiol presence within cellular environments and highlighting their potential for diagnostic and therapeutic applications in biomedical research.

1. Introduction

Biothiols, such as cysteine (Cys), homocysteine (Hcy), and glutathione (GSH), play crucial roles in various physiological processes including cellular defense against oxidative stress, enzyme regulation, and signal transduction [1,2]. These sulfur-containing compounds maintain redox homeostasis and facilitate numerous metabolic pathways. The dysregulation of biothiol levels is associated with a myriad of diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders [3], and cardiovascular diseases [4,5]. Consequently, the accurate and sensitive detection of biothiols is of paramount importance for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Traditional methods for biothiol detection, such as chromatography [6] and electrophoresis [7], although effective, often require complex procedures and sophisticated instrumentation, limiting their practicality for routine clinical and field applications. Therefore, the development of simple, rapid, and cost-effective detection methods is highly sought after in biochemical research and clinical diagnostics.
One promising strategy that has gained significant attention is the indicator displacement approach (IDA) [8,9]. This method leverages the competitive binding of biothiols to a metal complex or a supramolecular host system, which is initially associated with an indicator molecule. The presence of biothiols results in the displacement of the indicator, leading to a measurable change in the optical or fluorescent properties of the system. The IDA offers several advantages, including high selectivity, sensitivity, and the potential for real-time monitoring. Furthermore, the simplicity of the assay design makes it an attractive alternative for on-site and high-throughput screening applications. Recently, plasmonic materials such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), and various quantum dots have shown promising results in the field of biothiol detection [10,11,12]. The thiol group in biothiols shows a strong affinity towards Au and Ag which can induce changes in the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption peaks of nanoparticles, and this event can be easily monitored by optical spectroscopy techniques. The interaction of thiols or analytes with NPs results in a change in size, shape, and SPR properties, which can induce visible color changes. NP-based detection shows high sensitivity, but due to unwanted interactions and complex sample matrices, selectivity towards analytes is still challenging in the field of the detection of biothiols. Another interesting aspect of plasmonic nanomaterials such as Au and Ag is that they possess surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) properties which have emerged as a powerful tool, offering unparalleled sensitivity and molecular specificity [13,14,15]. The principle of SERS involves the enhancement of Raman scattering signals from molecules adsorbed on nanostructured metal surfaces, typically Au or Ag, leading to a dramatic improvement in detection limits. AuNPs serve as excellent SERS substrates due to their unique optical properties, facile synthesis, and biocompatibility, making them well suited for biological applications and analyte detection. Recently, plasmonic chiral Au nanomaterials have been used for the enantioselective recognition of cysteine with high sensitivity and reproducibility using the SERS technique [16,17].
Thus, herein, we report on an innovative approach in which the IDA is coupled with SERS to detect biothiols. The IDA-SERS strategy combines the specificity and dynamic range of the IDA with SERS’s high sensitivity and molecular fingerprinting capabilities. For this, we synthesized a nanocomposite (1) from AuNPs and a dual BODIPY dye (DBDP). This method leveraged the competitive binding of biothiols to AuNPs, displacing the pre-bound indicator DBDP whose release was then detected by fluorescence spectroscopy. The binding of biothiols caused a noticeable color change from pale purple to dark brown with a “turn-on” fluorescence in DBDP dye, which was nonfluorescent when on the surface of AuNPs. The lack of fluorescence is due to the strong coupling between the electronic states of DBDP and the surface plasmon of AuNPs, leading to the creation of hybrid states [18,19]. The AuNPs bound with biothiols were separated by simple centrifugation and were analyzed using Raman spectroscopy. The SERS technique provided an amplified Raman signal due to the localized surface plasmon resonance effect of metallic nanostructures, offering a powerful tool for the trace detection of biothiols. Thus, the detection of biothiols can be performed in multiple ways by monitoring the colorimetric response (daylight/UV light), emission spectroscopy, and precisely by SERS measurements. Both solution and dry-state mapping studies using Raman spectroscopy showed an attomolar detection limit for Cys with high sensitivity and reproducibility. Moreover, the nanocomposite allowed for the detection of Cys in cancer cells. It allowed for a path for differentiating normal cells and cancer cells due to the overexpression of biothiol in the latter.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Techniques

The experiments were conducted under controlled conditions at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C), utilizing doubly distilled water throughout. Experiments were performed either in a 3 mM acetate buffer at pH 9.5 or using 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.4. Absorption spectra were meticulously recorded using a Shimadzu UV-Vis spectrophotometer within 3 mL quartz cuvettes with a path length of 1 cm. Fluorescence spectra, on the other hand, were captured using an Edinburgh FS5 spectrofluorometer. The limit of detection was computed following the methodology outlined in reference [8]. For dynamic light scattering analysis, a Malvern Zetasizer 2000 DLS spectrometer equipped with a 633 nm CW laser was employed. The NPs were characterized using TEM (H-7100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Sample preparation involved depositing a droplet of nanocomposite suspension onto a 300-mesh TEM grid, followed by vacuum drying for 2 h. Fluorescence microscopy studies were conducted using an Olympus IX73 microscope. Raman spectra were obtained using an inverted Raman microscope (NOST, Seoul, Republic of Korea) equipped with a 60× objective lens (0.6 N.A.) (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). A 633 nm laser (CNI laser, Changchun, China) was used to illuminate the solution. The scattered Raman signal was captured through a confocal motorized pinhole (100 μm) and directed towards a spectrometer (FEX-MD, NOST, Republic of Korea) with a 1200 g/mm grating. Finally, the signal was recorded by a spectroscopy charge-modified device camera (Andor DV401A-BVF, Belfast, Northern Ireland).

2.2. Materials

HAuCl4, L-amino acids, homocysteine, glutathione, phosphate-buffered saline, bovine serum albumin, fetal bovine serum albumin, human serum albumin, and sodium acetate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.3. Synthesis Procedures

2.3.1. Synthesis of DBDP

DBDP was synthesized as per a previous literature report with slight modifications [20]. Briefly, 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (1 mmol, 0.265 g) was dissolved in dry CHCl3 (50 mL) and stirred for 10 min. After this, a solution of 2,4-dimethylpyrrole (6 mmol, 0.57 g) in dry CHCl3 (20 mL) was added dropwise, and the mixture was stirred for 10 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature. Triethylamine (2.8 mL) was then added dropwise over 5 min, followed by the addition of BF3·Et2O (3 mL) over another 5 min. The reaction was stirred for an additional 10 h at 0 °C. The mixture was washed with saturated brine solution, water-dried over Na2SO4, and then evaporated under vacuum. The crude product was purified using column chromatography on silica gel with hexane and ethyl acetate as eluents, yielding DBDP as an orange-yellow solid (52 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.19 (s, 2H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 5.95 (m, 5H), 2.49 (s, 12H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 1.49 (s, 12H). HRMS calculated for C39H39B2F4N5O 691.3279, obtained 691.3277.

2.3.2. Synthesis of AuNP-DBDP Nanocomposite NC1

Nanocomposite NC1 was prepared as per our previous reports [18,19]. To a stirred solution of L-tryptophan (25 mM) in 9 mL of water at 25 °C, 1 mL of an aqueous solution of HAuCl4 (5 mM stock solution) and a solution of DBDP (5 mM) in 1 mL of acetone were added simultaneously. The mixture turned brown-orange upon mixing and was stirred continuously for 16 h at 25 °C. Afterward, the resulting precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed with water (3 × 5 mL), dried, and then redispersed in water. The formation of nanocomposite NC1 was then monitored using UV-Vis absorption measurements and was further characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and microscopy techniques.

2.3.3. Synthesis of DBDP Nanoparticles

A solution of DBDP in acetone (1 mg in 1 mL) was added dropwise to stirring water (9 mL), and the solution was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. Following this period, the particles were centrifuged (8000 rpm), and the residue obtained was redispersed and analyzed using spectroscopy and TEM measurements.

2.4. SERS-Based Detection of Biothiols

For the SERS based detection of biothiols, nanocomposite NC1 (50 μg/mL) was incubated with various concentrations of biothiols (10−6 M to 10−21 M), centrifuged (8000 rpm, 5 min), and then the residue was redispersed in water, drop-cast on a glass slide using a silicone isolator. The Raman spectra were recorded for each sample solution using a 633 nm laser (exposure time; 10 s, 6.8 mW, 60× objective lens). The samples were dried, and the solid mass containing AuNPs and biothiols was analyzed for Raman mapping studies. About a 1.5–2.0 mm spot on the glass was scanned with a 60× objective for 25 × 25 pixels (10 s exposure time per pixel). The Raman mapping images were based on the intensity of the Raman shift at 674 cm–1 for biothiols.

2.5. Cell Culture

The breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and the mouse fibroblast cell line L929 were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Himedia, Thane, India), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Himedia) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution (Himedia). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and subcultured twice a week.

2.6. Cellular Uptake Studies

The breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and mouse fibroblast cell line L929 were seeded into a 12-well plate at a density of 1 × 10⁴ cells per well. These cells were then incubated with either a control or various concentrations of NC1 (0, 12.5, and 50 μg/mL). After 24 h of incubation, the cells were fixed using a 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 10–12 min and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline.

3. Results

3.1. Nanocomposite Preparation and Characterization

Dual BODIPY (DBDP) was prepared as per previous reports and characterized using 1HNMR and mass spectrometry (Figure S1A,B). The nanocomposite was prepared using previous literature reports [18,19]. The formation of the nanocomposite (NC1) was confirmed using UV–visible spectroscopy studies. Tryptophan-reduced AuNPs showed an extinction peak at 530 nm, whereas the nanocomposite showed a redshifted peak at 545 nm as a shoulder in the spectra. The DBDP molecule showed an absorption peak at 505 nm in acetone but a redshifted absorption peak at 532 nm in the nanocomposite indicating an interaction between Au and DBDP (Figure 1A). DBDP is emissive in acetone with an emission peak at 528 nm, and it was reported previously that DBDP has a quantum yield of 0.006 in MeOH [20]. After the formation of NC1, the fluorescence from DBDP was quenched, indicating a strong interaction between excited states of DBDP with AuNPs (Figure 1B). From previous reports, the complex of BODIPY and tryptophan-reduced AuNPs is stabilized by various supramolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding, Au-Fδ− bonds, indole -NH-Fδ− bonds, etc. [18]. In the DBDP molecule, the additional pyrrole -NH in the core will further stabilize the nanocomposite. Transmission electron microscopy studies showed spherical particles with an average diameter of 25 ± 2.3 nm for NC1 (Figure 1C). The dynamic light scattering experiments showed a hydrodynamic size of 42 ± 4.1 (Figure 1D). The electron mapping studies further supported the incorporation of DBDP into the Au matrix (Figure S2).

3.2. Investigation of Biothiol Interaction and IDA Principle

The thiol group possesses strong interactions with AuNPs, and thus, it can displace weakly bound surfactants from the surface of AuNPs. Here in NC1, DBDP dye is weakly bound to AuNPs and is nonfluorescent in the supramolecular nanocomposite. The interaction of biothiols with AuNPs makes a strong bond with Au, displaces DBDP dye from its surface, and then regains its emission property (Scheme 1).
To test this hypothesis and whether our designed nanocomposite can show an indicator displacement property, we studied the interaction of NC1 with various L-amino acids using optical spectroscopy techniques. As shown in Figure 2A–C, among the amino acids tested, NC1 showed dramatic changes in the absorption and emission spectra after adding L-Cys, L-Hcy, and L-GSH in acetate buffer. The addition of biothiols resulted in a peak broadening at 550 nm with the formation of new higher wavelength absorption bands for NC1 (Figure 2A–C). The higher wavelength absorption bands are due to the formation of AuNP aggregates, as confirmed by the transmission electron microscopy studies (Figure S3A–C). Meanwhile, the peak intensity for the DBDP molecule decreased with broadening in the peak indicating the formation of aggregates of the DBDP molecule. As mentioned in Section 3.1, NC1 was non-emissive, whereas the addition of biothiols showed a regular increase in the fluorescence of NC1, indicating DBDP dye is displacing from the surface of AuNPs (Figure 2D–F).
The optical response in NC1 with biothiols was further supported by the observed visual color changes and the response under UV light. As shown in Figure 3A, adding biothiols resulted in a color change from pale purple to brown in daylight, and under UV light, these solutions showed green fluorescence. Among the biothiols, the changes were more prominent for Cys compared to Hcy and GSH, due to the difference in their acidity of thiol groups and steric effect from the peptide backbones [21]. By adding L-Cys, the absorption spectra for NC1 showed a new absorption peak at 570 nm with a higher wavelength band at 850 nm (Figure 2A). To confirm the origin of this new band at 570 nm, we studied the aggregation property of DBDP in acetone–water (1:9), and the optical spectra for DBDP NPs showed an absorption peak at 575 nm (Figure 3C). Thus, with the addition of Cys, the new band at 570 nm is due to the aggregates or nanoparticle formation of DBDP. Transmission electron microscopy studies showed that DBDP NPs possess an average size of 135 ± 5.6 nm. The emission spectra obtained after biothiol addition showed similar emission characteristics as those of DBDP NPs, indicating that biothiols induce the displacement of DBDP, thereby making the DBDP molecule water-insoluble and inducing aggregation-induced emission in the NPs (Figure 3D).
Next, we studied the selectivity of NC1 with thiols using various L-amino acids and sulfide-containing molecules. As shown in Figure S4A,B, the other amino acids such as glycine (Gly), valine (Val), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), cystine (Cyst), histidine (His), aspartic acid (Asp), glutamic acid (Glu), tryptophan (Trp), threonine (Thr), alanine (Ala), methionine (Met), and proline (Pro) did not induce any changes in the absorption or emission spectra of NC1. Sulfide ions changed the optical spectrum of NC1 but with a lower magnitude than biothiols (Figure S4A,B). A mixture of NC1 with Cys, Hcy, GSH, and S2- in acetate buffer showed similar changes in the spectrum, and the observed enhancement in the fluorescence from a solution of these mixtures was like that of NC1 with Cys, indicating a higher selectivity for Cys than other biothiols and sulfide-containing species (Figure S4C,D). The detection limit for biothiols with NC1 was calculated using their optical spectroscopic data. A linear correlation was obtained for the various concentrations of biothiols tested (10 nM to 3 μM) (Figure S5A–C). The nanocomposite NC1 showed a detection limit of 3.2 nM for Cys with a detectable visual response under UV light. Meanwhile, NC1 showed a detection limit of 55.2 nM for Hcy and 37.5 nM for GSH. The formation of nanoaggregates and the observed optical response of biothiols with NC1 were further tested using fluorescence microscopic images. The appearance of fluorescence from the aggregates of NC1 after the addition of various biothiols supports the IDA-based approach and detection of biothiols using NC1 (Figure S6).

3.3. Biothiol Detection under Physiological Conditions

It is important to find the utility of our designed nanocomposite NC1 for the detection of biothiols under biological conditions. To investigate this, we studied the interaction of NC1 with biothiols under physiological conditions using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4, both alone and in the presence of several biomolecules. It was observed that the absorption and emission spectra changes in NC1 upon the addition of biothiols in PBS were consistent with those observed in acetate buffer at pH 9 (Figure 4A,B). The titrations of NC1 with biothiols in fetal bovine serum (FBS), as well as in the presence of human serum and bovine serum albumin, HSA and BSA, demonstrated that the fluorescence response of NC1 with biothiols under these conditions matched the response seen in the acetate buffer (Figure 4B). Under all these tested biological conditions, NC1 showed a visual response similar to that observed in acetate buffer, indicating the effectiveness of our system in detecting biothiols under physiological conditions, even in the presence of potentially interfering biomolecules (Figure 4C,D).

3.4. SERS-Based Detection of Biothiols

Next, we investigated the detection of biothiols using Raman spectroscopy analysis which shows high sensitivity for analyte detection. Raman spectra show high selectivity in terms of the characteristic Raman peaks, which is a fingerprint for a particular molecule [22,23]. Using plasmonic nanomaterials, the Raman response for various analytes can be enhanced by the so-called surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) principle [24,25,26]. For SERS, the plasmonic nanomaterials should show enhanced electromagnetic fields at the interaction point with the analytes, called hot spots [27,28]. The molecules that are trapped in these hot spots show a higher enhancement in the Raman signals. The interaction of biothiols with AuNPs resulted in the displacement of DBDP dye along with the aggregation of AuNPs, as confirmed by the TEM studies. Since thiols show strong affinity towards Au, after aggregation, the thiol molecules can become trapped in the hot spots in AuNPs, thereby enhancing their Raman signal intensity which allows for detection for a single molecular level. After the interaction with biothiols, the solutions of NPs with analyte were centrifuged, and the precipitated NPs were analyzed using Raman spectroscopy, in both solutions and Raman mapping studies for the dry samples. The characteristic Raman peak intensity for various biothiols was monitored as a function of the concentration of the biothiols. As shown in Figure 5A,B, the NPs with Cys displacement showed Raman peaks at 635 and 674 cm−1, corresponding to the -CH2-S- bands in cysteine [29,30]. As the concentration of Cys increased, the peak intensity at 674 cm−1 was enhanced, indicating the formation of more hot spots in the aggregate. A linear correlation was observed with the concentration of Cys added to NC1, with the peak intensity at 674 cm−1 (Figure 5B). SERS-based analysis showed a femtomolar detection limit (10−15 M) for Cys, showing a higher sensitivity than optical spectroscopic-based techniques (Figure 5A,B). Similarly, for Hcy and GSH, the characteristic Raman peak at 674 cm−1 (-CH2-S- bond) was confirmed, and the SERS-based assay showed linearity with the concentrations and peak intensity at 674 cm−1 (Figure 5C–F) [31]. The detection limit for Hcy and GSH showed a sensitivity up to picomolar levels (10−12 M), much higher than optical spectroscopy-based detection. Thus, the SERS-based assay further validated the detection of biothiols using our nanocomposite NC1. The higher signal intensity and sharp Raman peaks for cysteine indicate a higher degree of aggregation and hot-spot formation than GSH and Hcy with NC1.

3.5. Raman Mapping-Based Detection of Biothiols

Raman mapping offers a powerful approach for the label-free and non-destructive detection of various analytes in complex systems. By exploiting the characteristic vibrational fingerprints of biothiols, Raman mapping can enable the precise spatial localization and quantification of these molecules with high sensitivity and specificity. We investigated the SERS-based Raman mapping of biothiols from our nanocomposite NC1. The biothiol–AuNPs after DBDP exchange were collected and drop-casted on a glass slide and allowed to dry. These dried spots were analyzed using Raman spectroscopy, and the characteristic Raman peak at 674 cm−1 was analyzed using mapping studies. From the contrast of such Raman mapping images for a characteristic Raman peak can be correlated linearly with the analyte concentrations. As shown in Figure 6A,B, the Raman mapping analysis showed bright spots for a lower concentration up to 10−18 M, for L-Cys indicating a single molecule detection for L-Cys. Similarly, for Hcy and GSH, Raman mapping studies for the peak at 674 cm−1 showed a femtomolar detection limit (10−15 M), allowing for a high sensitivity in detection (Figure 6C–F). The enhanced signal intensity can be correlated with the enhanced electromagnetic field generated in the dry state for the enhanced SERS response for the adsorbed materials on AuNPs. Because of the IDA, the aggregation becomes more prominent because of various thermodynamic effects. The bright red spots indicate a measure of the Raman spectrum intensity for the peak at 674 cm−1 (Figure 6B,D,F). The variation in the Raman spectrum across or throughout a sample creates a contrast, which gives a clear measure for the biothiol detection depending on the concentration.

3.6. Cellular Imaging Studies

As part of the investigation, next, we studied the use of our developed system for the detection of biothiols in cancer cells. Since cancer cells show overexpressed cysteine content, our developed nanocomposite NC1 can detect cysteine in cellular conditions [32]. For this, we checked the biocompatibility of NC1 with L929 cell lines. It was shown that NC1 is not cytotoxic up to 200 μg/mL (Figure S7). Next, we treated 12.5 and 50 μg/mL of NC1 with normal cell lines L929 and MDA-MB 231 cancer cell lines and imaged them using fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Figure 7, the cancer cells showed green fluorescence as compared to the normal cells. As expected, owing to higher biothiol concentrations in cancer cells, the IDA principle allowed DBDP NPs to displace from AuNPs and allowed for enhanced cellular imaging. AuNPs act as carriers for the transport of DBDP dye and improve its water solubility for bioapplications. Thus, our developed system can differentiate cancer cells from normal cells.

3.7. Test Strips from NC1 for Biothiol Detection

Our goal was to explore the potential of casting the nanocomposite onto a solid support to enhance its practical applicability. To this end, we prepared test-paper strips of NC1 by dip-coating Whatman filter papers with an aqueous solution of the nanocomposite. A solution of 150 μg of NC1 in 3 mL of water was prepared, and the test strips were dipped into the solution for an hour. Afterward, the test strips were dried in an oven before use. Owing to the strong color of the nanocomposite from DBDP dye and AuNPs, the developed test strips showed a pale red color. Upon adding L-Cys, L-Hcy, and L-GSH to these strips, we observed an immediate color shift from pale red to pale yellow under ambient light. Interestingly, the test strips which were nonfluorescent showed a bright bluish-green fluorescence when exposed to UV light. This notable sensitivity allowed the test paper strips to detect biothiols across a broad concentration spectrum, ranging from molar to nanomolar levels. Such a wide detection range indicates the efficacy of the nanocomposite test strips in identifying biothiols, suggesting their potential utility in various practical applications where rapid and sensitive detection is crucial (Figure 8A–C).

4. Discussion

This study presents a simple and easy way to detect biothiols with high accuracy and sensitivity using the displacement of DBDP dye from nanocomposite NC1. The nanocomposite was prepared in a one-step procedure, using Au (III) reduction followed by the adsorption of DBDP dye on the surface of AuNPs. NC1 showed a brown-orange color which on interaction with biothiols showed a dark brown color. Even though biothiols play a key role in biological reactions, their elevated levels can induce certain diseases as well as acting as a key biomarker for tumors. Thus, the detection and quantification of biothiols are important.
The formation of NC1 was confirmed by various optical spectroscopic and microscopic studies. The nanocomposites were found to be stable for one month as confirmed by the changes in particle size. Owing to the surface plasmon resonance of AuNPs, and the aggregation-induced color changes in DBDP dye, the resultant NC1 showed a clear drastic orange-brown color, which can be easily used as a marker for biothiol detection owing to the rapid color change to dark brown. Moreover, under UV light, the addition of biothiols induced a green fluorescence from displaced DBDP dye. The nanocomposite NC1 can be coated with Whatman filter papers, and the resultant pale brown-colored paper strips can be used for the on-site identification of biothiols. Thus, NC1-coated filter papers can be used as indicators for biothiols from the visual color changes, and with the aid of proper modifications and supporting materials, NC1 can be used as an indicator material for biothiols with varying concentrations.
The detection of biothiols was not only performed using colorimetric changes from NC1 and DBDP dye but was also validated using various optical spectroscopic techniques. The designed IDA platform offered a sensitive detection up to nanomolar concentrations with high reproducibility. Sensitivity in the detection of biothiols was further validated under biological conditions, and the fluorescence from DBDP dye after displacement from AuNPs was monitored as a measure for the detection of biothiols.
Lastly, along with the IDA, the detection of biothiols was performed using a more sensitive technique like Raman spectroscopy. Since Raman spectra offer a fingerprint for the identification of various analytes, the nanoaggregates from AuNP after the IDA were analyzed. Both solution and solid-state Raman analysis for biothiols offered a high sensitivity up to femtomolar levels for GSH and Hcy, whereas there was an attomolar sensitivity for L-Cys. A comparative list of the limit of detection of biothiols using previous studies and the present work is represented in Table S1.
The developed nanocomposite materials displace DBDP dye from the AuNPs and give a turn-on fluorescence for DBDP NPs, so we studied the application of NC1 for bioimaging applications. Since cancer cells possess an elevated level of biothiols, especially cysteine, the IDA can be used for differentiating cancer and normal cells. NC1 showed strong fluorescence in the cancer cells (MDA-MB 231) for the tested concentrations, whereas for the normal cell line L929, there was no fluorescence at the same concentrations of NC1. Moreover, we prepared test strips from NC1 for the detection of biothiols for on-site applications. The visual colorimetric response from the test strips allowed for the detection of biothiols with a concentration from micromolar to nanomolar levels.
The combination of the indicator displacement approach (IDA) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) presents a promising strategy for the sensitive and selective detection of biothiols. For enhanced sensitivity and selectivity, the development of new nanostructured materials with optimized surface properties and indicator dye molecules is important. For enhancing SERS signals, exploring different metals, such as silver or gold, and various nanostructures like nanostars, nanoflowers, or core–shell nanoparticles can be performed. Customized indicators with higher binding affinities and selectivity for biothiols can be studied. Molecular modeling and computational chemistry could assist in predicting and optimizing these interactions. The system can be expanded to simultaneously detect multiple biothiols by using a combination of different indicators, each specific to a particular biothiol, along with distinct SERS-active nanomaterials. This could be facilitated by spectral separation in the SERS readout. Ratiometric approaches can be implemented where the relative intensities of different SERS peaks provide a quantitative measure of multiple biothiols in a single assay.
Developing systems capable of the real-time monitoring of biothiol concentrations in biological samples can be a future goal. This would require advances in the stability and reproducibility of SERS substrates and displacement indicator dye molecules. Exploring biocompatible SERS substrates and indicators that can be safely used for in vivo applications could involve creating nanoparticles that can circulate in the bloodstream and target specific tissues or cells. Combining the SERS-based IDA with microfluidic platforms to create portable, point-of-care devices for rapid and on-site biothiol detection would enhance the practicality and accessibility of this technique in clinical and field settings.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we designed a nanocomposite NC1 from AuNPs and BODIPY dye for the detection of biothiols using various detection platforms. The incorporation of BODIPY dye to the AuNPs allowed for the detection of biothiols using an indicator displacement approach via turn-on fluorescence from the nanocomposite. This method allowed for a visual colorimetric response under daylight and a clear fluorescence response under UV light. This method allowed for a simple and easy detection platform for biothiols. The investigation was further extended using Raman spectroscopy, which allowed for the detection of cysteine up to femtomolar detection with high sensitivity in the solution state. Meanwhile, a single molecule detection up to 10−18 M was achieved for the dried samples of AuNPs with L-cysteine after the displacement of DBDP dye. Moreover, the IDA-based strategy was applied to distinguish cancer and normal cells, using the turn-on fluorescence from the dye. The present study opens design strategies for the multimode detection of various analytes or biothiols with high sensitivity and accuracy. This work can be further extended in the future for the in vivo applications and detection of tumors using Raman spectroscopy. Owing to the photosensitization and surface functionalization properties of AuNPs, these nanomaterials can be used for therapeutical applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/colorants3030015/s1. Figure S1: 1HNMR and High-resolution mass spectrometry data for DBDP dye. Figure S2: Elemental maps of the nanocomposite NC1 using field emission scanning electron microscopy. Figure S3. Transmission electron microscopic studies for NC1 with biothiols. Figure S4: Optical spectroscopy changes for NC1 with biothiols. Figure S5: Linear response curves for the changes in the fluorescence of NC1. Figure S6: Fluorescence microscopic images for NC1 with biothiols. Figure S7: MTT-based cell viability study for NC1. Table S1: Comparison of various sensors developed for biothiol detection. References [33,34,35,36,37,38] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Funding

KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, and the BK21 fellowship program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data can be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

PK shows sincere gratitude to Dong-Kwon Lim, KUKIST, S. Korea, for allowing a short visit to Prakash P. Neelakandan and his research group at INST, Mohali, India, as a part of the BK21 fellowship program. PK acknowledges Prakash P. Neelakandan, INST, Mohali, Punjab, India, for accepting the short-term visit to his lab and the help provided by him for the synthesis of DBDP dye. The author acknowledges the instrumentation facilities in KUKIST and INST Mohali for this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smeyne, M.; Smeyne, R.J. Glutathione Metabolism and Parkinson’s Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 62, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hand, C.E.; Honek, J.F. Biological Chemistry of Naturally Occurring Thiols of Microbial and Marine Origin. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McBean, G.J.; Aslan, M.; Griffiths, H.R.; Torrão, R.C. Thiol Redox Homeostasis in Neurodegenerative Disease. Redox Biol. 2015, 5, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, X.; Guo, Y.; Strongin, R.M. Conjugate Addition/Cyclization Sequence Enables Selective and Simultaneous Fluorescence Detection of Cysteine and Homocysteine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10690–10693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lin, W.; Long, L.; Yuan, L.; Cao, Z.; Chen, B.; Tan, W. A Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Cysteine and Homocysteine Displaying a Large Emission Shift. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5577–5580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Özyürek, M.; Baki, S.; Güngör, N.; Çelik, S.E.; Güçlü, K.; Apak, R. Determination of Biothiols by a Novel On-Line HPLC-DTNB Assay with Post-Column Detection. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2012, 750, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vandeberg, P.J.; Johnson, D.C. Pulsed Electrochemical Detection of Cysteine, Cystine, Methionine, and Glutathione at Gold Electrodes Following Their Separation by Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 2713–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Praveen Kumar, P.P.; Kaur, N.; Shanavas, A.; Neelakandan, P.P. Nanomolar Detection of Biothiols via Turn-ON Fluorescent Indicator Displacement. Analyst 2020, 145, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qian, S.; Lin, H. A Colorimetric Indicator-Displacement Assay Array for Selective Detection and Identification of Biological Thiols. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 1903–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, P.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Park, K.S.; Park, H.G. Colorimetric Detection of Individual Biothiols by Tailor Made Reactions with Silver Nanoprisms. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Markina, M.; Stozhko, N.; Krylov, V.; Vidrevich, M.; Brainina, K. Nanoparticle-Based Paper Sensor for Thiols Evaluation in Human Skin. Talanta 2017, 165, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, L.; Li, B. Sensitive and Selective Detection of Cysteine Using Gold Nanoparticles as Colorimetric Probes. Analyst 2009, 134, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, C.; Chen, S.; Jiang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Wang, J.; Du, L. Highly Sensitive and Reproducible SERS Substrates Based on Ordered Micropyramid Array and Silver Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 29222–29229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Langer, J.; Jimenez De Aberasturi, D.; Aizpurua, J.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Auguié, B.; Baumberg, J.J.; Bazan, G.C.; Bell, S.E.J.; Boisen, A.; Brolo, A.G.; et al. Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 28–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tim, B.; Błaszkiewicz, P.; Kotkowiak, M. Recent Advances in Metallic Nanoparticle Assemblies for Surface-Enhanced Spectroscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, X.; Kong, H.; Zhou, Q.; Tsunega, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, H.; Jin, R.-H. Chiral Plasmonic Nanoparticle Assisted Raman Enantioselective Recognition. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 8015–8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kumar, P.P.P.; Kim, M.; Lim, D. Amino Acid-Modulated Chirality Evolution and Highly Enantioselective Chiral Nanogap-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2301503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, P.P.P.; Yadav, P.; Shanavas, A.; Thurakkal, S.; Joseph, J.; Neelakandan, P.P. A Three-Component Supramolecular Nanocomposite as a Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizer. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 5623–5626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rahman, A.; Praveen Kumar, P.P.; Yadav, P.; Goswami, T.; Shanavas, A.; Ghosh, H.N.; Neelakandan, P.P. Gold–BODIPY Nanoparticles with Luminescence and Photosensitization Properties for Photodynamic Therapy and Cell Imaging. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 6532–6542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Song, N.; Chen, L.; Xie, Z. Triple-BODIPY Organic Nanoparticles with Particular Fluorescence Emission. Dye. Pigment. 2017, 147, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chu, C.; Stamatelatos, D.; McNeill, K. Aquatic Indirect Photochemical Transformations of Natural Peptidic Thiols: Impact of Thiol Properties, Solution pH, Solution Salinity and Metal Ions. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2017, 19, 1518–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pérez-Jiménez, A.I.; Lyu, D.; Lu, Z.; Liu, G.; Ren, B. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Benefits, Trade-Offs and Future Developments. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4563–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, C.; Li, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xu, M.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Z.; Shi, J.; Yang, Y. Recent Development of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering for Biosensing. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cialla-May, D.; Zheng, X.-S.; Weber, K.; Popp, J. Recent Progress in Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Biological and Biomedical Applications: From Cells to Clinics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3945–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fleischmann, M.; Hendra, P.J.; McQuillan, A.J. Raman Spectra of Pyridine Adsorbed at a Silver Electrode. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974, 26, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, P.P.P.; Kaushal, S.; Lim, D.-K. Recent Advances in Nano/Microfabricated Substrate Platforms and Artificial Intelligence for Practical Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering-Based Bioanalysis. Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 168, 117341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lim, D.-K.; Jeon, K.-S.; Kim, H.M.; Nam, J.-M.; Suh, Y.D. Nanogap-Engineerable Raman-Active Nanodumbbells for Single-Molecule Detection. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ou, F.S.; Hu, M.; Naumov, I.; Kim, A.; Wu, W.; Bratkovsky, A.M.; Li, X.; Williams, R.S.; Li, Z. Hot-Spot Engineering in Polygonal Nanofinger Assemblies for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2538–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Parker, S.F. Assignment of the Vibrational Spectrum of L-Cysteine. Chem. Phys. 2013, 424, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lomont, J.P.; Smith, J.P. In Situ Raman Spectroscopy for Real Time Detection of Cysteine. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 274, 121068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kuligowski, J.; EL-Zahry, M.R.; Sánchez-Illana, Á.; Quintás, G.; Vento, M.; Lendl, B. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Direct Determination of Low Molecular Weight Biothiols in Umbilical Cord Whole Blood. Analyst 2016, 141, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Combs, J.A.; DeNicola, G.M. The Non-Essential Amino Acid Cysteine Becomes Essential for Tumor Proliferation and Survival. Cancers 2019, 11, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shi, Y.; Sun, C.; Gao, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, N. Sensitively and Selectively Detect Biothiols by Using Fluorescence Method and Resonance Light Scattering Technique Simultaneously. Molecules 2019, 24, 4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, J.; Zhang, K.; Ji, J.; Liu, B. Sensitive and Label-Free Quantification of Cellular Biothiols by Competitive Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Talanta 2016, 152, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhao, H.; Chen, M.; Ma, C. Fluorescent Method for the Detection of Biothiols Using an Ag+-Mediated Conformational Switch. Sensors 2019, 19, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gao, W.; Liu, Z.; Qi, L.; Lai, J.; Kitte, S.A.; Xu, G. Ultrasensitive Glutathione Detection Based on Lucigenin Cathodic Electrochemiluminescence in the Presence of MnO2 Nanosheets. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 7654–7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Turino, M.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Guerrini, L. Plasmonic Azobenzene Chemoreporter for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Detection of Biothiols. Biosensors 2022, 12, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhao, W.; Sun, M.; Lei, T.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zong, C. An Indicator-Displacement Assay Based on the Murexide-Hg2+ System for Fluorescence Turn-on Detection of Biothiols in Biological Fluids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 249, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characterization of NC1. (A) UV–visible and (B) emission spectra for DBDP in acetone (50 μM), L-tryptophan AuNPs (50 μg/mL), and nanocomposite NC1 (50 μg/mL) in acetate buffer. λexc = 490 nm. (C,D) represent transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering experiments for NC1.
Figure 1. Characterization of NC1. (A) UV–visible and (B) emission spectra for DBDP in acetone (50 μM), L-tryptophan AuNPs (50 μg/mL), and nanocomposite NC1 (50 μg/mL) in acetate buffer. λexc = 490 nm. (C,D) represent transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering experiments for NC1.
Colorants 03 00015 g001
Scheme 1. Working principle for prepared nanocomposite from DBDP dye and AuNPs for detection of biothiols using IDA principle.
Scheme 1. Working principle for prepared nanocomposite from DBDP dye and AuNPs for detection of biothiols using IDA principle.
Colorants 03 00015 sch001
Figure 2. The interaction of biothiols with NC1. (AC) represent the changes in extinction spectra for NC1 after the interaction with various amounts of L-cysteine, L-homocysteine, and L-glutathione, respectively. (DF) represent the changes in the emission spectra of NC1 with the addition of L-cysteine, L-homocysteine, and L-glutathione, respectively, where [NC1 = 50 μg/mL]. Studies were performed in acetate buffer pH = 9. Emission spectra were collected by exciting the samples at 490 nm (λexc = 490 nm).
Figure 2. The interaction of biothiols with NC1. (AC) represent the changes in extinction spectra for NC1 after the interaction with various amounts of L-cysteine, L-homocysteine, and L-glutathione, respectively. (DF) represent the changes in the emission spectra of NC1 with the addition of L-cysteine, L-homocysteine, and L-glutathione, respectively, where [NC1 = 50 μg/mL]. Studies were performed in acetate buffer pH = 9. Emission spectra were collected by exciting the samples at 490 nm (λexc = 490 nm).
Colorants 03 00015 g002
Figure 3. (A) Photographs for the visual color changes in NC1 under ambient and UV light in acetate buffer (pH 9.0) with various L-amino acids and S2− ions at 25 °C, where (i) NC1 (ii) NC1 + L-Gly (100 μM), (iii) NC1 + L-Val (100 μM), (iv) NC1 + L-leu (100 μM), (v) NC1 + L-Lys (100 μM), (vi) NC1 + L-Cyst (100 μM), (vii) NC1 + L-Cys (3 μM), (viii) NC1 + L-Hcy (3 μM), (ix) NC1 + L-GSH (3 μM), (x) NC1 + L-His (100 μM), (xi) NC1 + L-Asp (100 μM), (xii) NC1 + L-Glu (100 μM), (xiii) NC1 + L-Trp (100 μM), (xiv) NC1 + L-Thr (100 μM), (xv) NC1 + L-Ala (100 μM), (xvi) NC1 + L-Met (100 μM), (xvii) NC1 + L-Pro (100 μM), (NC1 + H2S (100 μM). (B,C) represent the extinction and emission spectra for DBDP NPs (50 μg/mL) and NC1 (50 μg/mL) + 3 μM L-Cys, respectively. (D) Transmission electron microscopy images for DBDP NPs.
Figure 3. (A) Photographs for the visual color changes in NC1 under ambient and UV light in acetate buffer (pH 9.0) with various L-amino acids and S2− ions at 25 °C, where (i) NC1 (ii) NC1 + L-Gly (100 μM), (iii) NC1 + L-Val (100 μM), (iv) NC1 + L-leu (100 μM), (v) NC1 + L-Lys (100 μM), (vi) NC1 + L-Cyst (100 μM), (vii) NC1 + L-Cys (3 μM), (viii) NC1 + L-Hcy (3 μM), (ix) NC1 + L-GSH (3 μM), (x) NC1 + L-His (100 μM), (xi) NC1 + L-Asp (100 μM), (xii) NC1 + L-Glu (100 μM), (xiii) NC1 + L-Trp (100 μM), (xiv) NC1 + L-Thr (100 μM), (xv) NC1 + L-Ala (100 μM), (xvi) NC1 + L-Met (100 μM), (xvii) NC1 + L-Pro (100 μM), (NC1 + H2S (100 μM). (B,C) represent the extinction and emission spectra for DBDP NPs (50 μg/mL) and NC1 (50 μg/mL) + 3 μM L-Cys, respectively. (D) Transmission electron microscopy images for DBDP NPs.
Colorants 03 00015 g003
Figure 4. (A) UV–visible and (B) emission spectra for NC1 (50 μg/mL) with L-Cys (3 μM) alone, in different pH (9, 7.4) conditions, and with various interfering biological molecules such as FBS, HSA, and BSA. (C,D) represent the visual colorimetric response for (i) NC1 (50 μg/mL) alone (ii) NC1 + L-Cys in pH = 9, (iii) NC1 + L-Cys in pH = 7.4, (iv) NC1 + L-Cys in FBS, (v) NC1 + L-Cys in HAS, and (vi) NC1 + L-Cys in BSA. λexc = 490 nm.
Figure 4. (A) UV–visible and (B) emission spectra for NC1 (50 μg/mL) with L-Cys (3 μM) alone, in different pH (9, 7.4) conditions, and with various interfering biological molecules such as FBS, HSA, and BSA. (C,D) represent the visual colorimetric response for (i) NC1 (50 μg/mL) alone (ii) NC1 + L-Cys in pH = 9, (iii) NC1 + L-Cys in pH = 7.4, (iv) NC1 + L-Cys in FBS, (v) NC1 + L-Cys in HAS, and (vi) NC1 + L-Cys in BSA. λexc = 490 nm.
Colorants 03 00015 g004
Figure 5. (AC) SERS spectra of NC1 after interaction with various concentrations of L-Cys, L-Hcy, and L-GSH, respectively, where thiols were added from (10−6 M to 10−17 M) to NC1 (50 μg/mL) (DF) Linear relationship between SERS peak intensities at 674 cm−1 and biothiol concentrations (L-Cys, L-Hcy, and L-GSH), respectively. Excitation: 633 nm laser (6.8 mW); exposure time: 10 s.
Figure 5. (AC) SERS spectra of NC1 after interaction with various concentrations of L-Cys, L-Hcy, and L-GSH, respectively, where thiols were added from (10−6 M to 10−17 M) to NC1 (50 μg/mL) (DF) Linear relationship between SERS peak intensities at 674 cm−1 and biothiol concentrations (L-Cys, L-Hcy, and L-GSH), respectively. Excitation: 633 nm laser (6.8 mW); exposure time: 10 s.
Colorants 03 00015 g005
Figure 6. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectra for the dried samples of NC1 with biothiols. (A) SERS spectra for dried samples of NC1 with various concentrations of L-Cys. (B) SERS Raman mapping for NC1 with various concentrations of L-Cys. (C,D) represent the SERS spectra and Raman mapping images for NC1 with various concentrations of L-Hcy, respectively. (E,F) SERS and Raman mapping images for the dried samples from NC1 with various concentrations of L-GSH.
Figure 6. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectra for the dried samples of NC1 with biothiols. (A) SERS spectra for dried samples of NC1 with various concentrations of L-Cys. (B) SERS Raman mapping for NC1 with various concentrations of L-Cys. (C,D) represent the SERS spectra and Raman mapping images for NC1 with various concentrations of L-Hcy, respectively. (E,F) SERS and Raman mapping images for the dried samples from NC1 with various concentrations of L-GSH.
Colorants 03 00015 g006
Figure 7. Bright-field and fluorescence microscopy images of L929 (normal) cell lines and MDA-MB 231 (cancer) cell lines following a 24 h incubation with NC1 at a concentration of 12.5 and 50 μg/mL.
Figure 7. Bright-field and fluorescence microscopy images of L929 (normal) cell lines and MDA-MB 231 (cancer) cell lines following a 24 h incubation with NC1 at a concentration of 12.5 and 50 μg/mL.
Colorants 03 00015 g007
Figure 8. Developed paper strips from NC1 for the detection of biothiols. (A) shows the color changes from NC1 paper strips by the addition of various amounts of L-Cys under day and UV light. (B) The color changes in the NC1 paper strips by the addition of L-Hcy under day and UV light conditions. (C) The observed color changes in the NC1 paper strips by the addition of L-GSH under day and UV light conditions, respectively.
Figure 8. Developed paper strips from NC1 for the detection of biothiols. (A) shows the color changes from NC1 paper strips by the addition of various amounts of L-Cys under day and UV light. (B) The color changes in the NC1 paper strips by the addition of L-Hcy under day and UV light conditions. (C) The observed color changes in the NC1 paper strips by the addition of L-GSH under day and UV light conditions, respectively.
Colorants 03 00015 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, P.P.P. A Multimode Detection Platform for Biothiols Using BODIPY Dye-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles. Colorants 2024, 3, 214-228. https://doi.org/10.3390/colorants3030015

AMA Style

Kumar PPP. A Multimode Detection Platform for Biothiols Using BODIPY Dye-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles. Colorants. 2024; 3(3):214-228. https://doi.org/10.3390/colorants3030015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Panangattukara Prabhakaran Praveen. 2024. "A Multimode Detection Platform for Biothiols Using BODIPY Dye-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles" Colorants 3, no. 3: 214-228. https://doi.org/10.3390/colorants3030015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop