Next Article in Journal
Dietary Organic Zinc Supplementation Modifies the Oxidative Genes via RORγ and Epigenetic Regulations in the Ileum of Broiler Chickens Exposed to High-Temperature Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Bufotalin Induces Oxidative Stress-Mediated Apoptosis by Blocking the ITGB4/FAK/ERK Pathway in Glioblastoma
Previous Article in Journal
Delayed Reproduction, Injury, and Regeneration of Testes in Out-of-Season Breeding of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus nigricans)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/antiox13091078
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring the Thioredoxin System as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer: Mechanisms and Implications

by
Rebecca Seitz
,
Deniz Tümen
,
Claudia Kunst
,
Phillip Heumann
,
Stephan Schmid
,
Arne Kandulski
,
Martina Müller
and
Karsten Gülow
*
Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2024, 13(9), 1078; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091078
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 28 August 2024 / Accepted: 1 September 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Redox-Modulating Strategies in Cancer Therapy: Targeted Thioredoxin System Inhibition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cells constantly face the challenge of managing oxidants. In aerobic organisms, oxygen (O2) is used for energy production, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) as byproducts of enzymatic reactions. To protect against oxidative damage, cells possess an intricate system of redox scavengers and antioxidant enzymes, collectively forming the antioxidant defense system. This system maintains the redox equilibrium and enables the generation of localized oxidative signals that regulate essential cellular functions. One key component of this defense is the thioredoxin (Trx) system, which includes Trx, thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), and NADPH. The Trx system reverses oxidation of macromolecules and indirectly neutralizes ROS via peroxiredoxin (Prx). This dual function protects cells from damage accumulation and supports physiological cell signaling. However, the Trx system also shields tumors from oxidative damage, aiding their survival. Due to elevated ROS levels from their metabolism, tumors often rely on the Trx system. In addition, the Trx system regulates critical pathways such as proliferation and neoangiogenesis, which tumors exploit to enhance growth and optimize nutrient and oxygen supply. Consequently, the Trx system is a potential target for cancer therapy. The challenge lies in selectively targeting malignant cells without disrupting the redox equilibrium in healthy cells. The aim of this review article is threefold: first, to elucidate the function of the Trx system; second, to discuss the Trx system as a potential target for cancer therapies; and third, to present the possibilities for inhibiting key components of the Trx system, along with an overview of the latest clinical studies on these inhibitors.

1. Introduction

Oxygen (O2) became crucial for life on Earth with the emergence of photosynthesis by archaebacteria. To utilize oxygen for energy production, organisms had to develop protective mechanisms against oxidation by O2 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [1,2,3,4].
All cells have to balance the generation of ROS and their elimination by cellular antioxidant networks. The primary source of ROS is mitochondrial metabolism. Cancer cells have higher ROS levels than healthy cells due to uncontrolled proliferation and high metabolic rates. Elevated levels of ROS render cells vulnerable to oxidative stress. This weakness could be exploited to target and combat malignant cells. Therefore, there is growing interest in modulating cellular redox equilibrium as a potential strategy for cancer treatment [5,6,7,8].
The primary cellular ROS include superoxide anions (O2•−), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [3,4,9,10,11]. In general, ROS production begins with electron transfer to O2, forming O2•−. O2•− is highly reactive, with a short half-life of about 1 μs and limited diffusion through membranes due to its charge [3,4]. In aqueous environments, O2•− rapidly converts to H2O2. Although not a radical, H2O2 is classified as an ROS. Compared to other ROS, it has a longer half-life of about 1 ms and can diffuse through cell membranes, and it is rather specific, oxidizing primarily free thiols [3,4]. H2O2 can be converted into water (H2O). This occurs via enzymes such as catalase, which transforms H2O2 into O2 and H2O [9,12,13]. Another key factor in H2O2 removal is the tripeptide glutathione, which acts as an effective oxidative scavenger in its reduced form (GSH) [9,12,14]. In addition to GSH, thioredoxin (Trx) acts as an essential disulfide reductase, reversing thiol oxidation. Trx is an important component of the cellular redox system, playing a crucial role in regulating various redox signaling pathways. It is also increasingly recognized as an important modulator of tumor development and tumor growth [14,15,16,17].
This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of the Trx system in cellular processes. The review will highlight how Trx contributes to cellular redox homeostasis and its broader implications in health and disease by discussing its function. The second goal of the review is to explore the potential of the Trx system as a therapeutic target in cancer treatment. The final objective is to present different strategies for inhibiting key components of the Trx system and to provide an overview of the latest clinical studies involving these inhibitors.

2. The Thioredoxin System

The thioredoxin system, comprising NADPH, Trx, and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), is highly conserved in all eukaryotic cells [18]. It plays a crucial role in regulating various cellular functions, including the activity of transcription factors, DNA synthesis (as a hydrogen donor for ribonucleotide reductase (RNR)), and cell growth through the activation of kinase cascades [19,20].

2.1. Thioredoxin

Trx is a small protein of 12 kDa, composed of five β-strands surrounded by four α-helices. This structure is conserved across the oxidoreductase superfamily [18]. In mammalian cells, three Trx isoforms have been identified: cytosolic Trx (Trx1), mitochondrial Trx (Trx2), and spermatozoa Trx (SpTrx). The redox-active site (CGPC) is conserved in all Trx proteins, typically located between the β2-strand and the N-terminal portion of α2 [21]. Human Trx1 has five cysteine (Cys) residues: Cys32 and Cys35 in the active center of the protein and Cys62, Cys67, and Cys73 outside the active center [18,21]. Cys73 regulates the overall activity of Trx [22,23,24,25,26]. The active form of Trx is the reduced dithiol form (Trx-(SH)2). Trx-(SH)2 can interact with target proteins and reduce disulfide bonds (-S-S-) within these proteins. During this process, the free thiols at the active site of Trx are oxidized, forming a disulfide bond between Cys32 and Cys35 (Trx-S2). This disulfide bond is then reduced back to the dithiol form by TrxR using NADPH as a co-factor, thus restoring the activity of Trx [18,19,27] (Figure 1A). In addition to reducing disulfide bonds in target proteins, Trx directly influences redox balances. Trx can transfer electrons to peroxiredoxins (Prx) to remove H2O2, ROOH, and ONOO− and thus eliminate oxidative stress [27,28,29] (Figure 1B). Furthermore, Trx serves as the hydrogen donor for methionine sulfoxide reductases. These enzymes are responsible for reducing oxidized methionine, thereby repairing damage caused by oxidation [30,31,32,33].
In addition to Trx, there is also the thioredoxin-related protein of 14 kDa (Trp14), which should also be briefly mentioned here. Trp14 is a highly conserved oxidoreductase that is ubiquitously expressed [34,35]. It serves as a substrate for TrxR1, which can reduce Trp14 and restore its activity [35]. Unlike Trx, Trp14 does not influence the activities of ribonucleotide reductase, peroxiredoxins, or methionine sulfoxide reductases. Trp14 reduces L-cystine and thereby directly affects glutathione synthesis, which in turn impacts the cellular redox equilibrium [34].

2.2. Thioredoxin Reductase

TrxRs are essential for the Trx system, catalyzing the reduction of oxidized Trx to its active form using electrons derived from NADPH (Figure 1A). TrxR homodimeric proteins belong to the flavoprotein family of pyridine nucleotide disulfide oxidoreductases, which contain a prosthetic FAD group, an NADPH-binding site, and a dithiol/disulfide redox-active site. The active site of mammalian TrxR contains a selenocysteine residue, which is essential for efficient catalysis and distinguishes it from other oxidoreductases [17,27] (Figure 2).
In humans, TrxR exists in three isoforms: TrxR1, located in the cytosol (55 kDa), the mitochondrial isoform TrxR2 (56.2 kDa), and TrxR3 (65 kDa), which is localized in the nucleus. TrxR2 contains an additional N-terminal sequence responsible for mitochondrial translocation. TrxR3 can reduce both oxidized Trx and oxidized glutathione (GSSSG), and is thus often referred to as thioredoxin-glutathione reductase [36,37,38,39]. TrxR3 contains an additional glutaredoxin domain at the N-terminus. This allows for the reduction of mixed disulfides in proteins formed by glutathionylation [38,39].

2.3. Functions of the Thioredoxin System

The Trx system reverses protein oxidations and can scavenge ROS (Figure 1), thus maintaining cellular redox equilibrium and modulating oxidative signals. Oxidative signals are integral to many signal transduction cascades, with H2O2 playing a key role due to its relatively long half-life, its ability to diffuse through membranes, and its primary attack on free thiols, leading to disulfide bond formation [4]. The reversibility of such oxidations is crucial for signaling, with Trx being pivotal in reducing disulfide bonds, thereby enabling the switching on and off of these signals.

2.3.1. Regulation of Thioredoxin Expression and Activity

To rapidly and precisely adapt to changes in redox equilibrium, Trx activity can be regulated at various levels, including gene expression, posttranslational modifications, and protein–protein interactions [23].
The transcription factors nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), TATA-binding protein (TBP), and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) can regulate the Trx system at the level of gene expression [29,40,41]. These transcription factors are activated by cellular stress, such as the accumulation of ROS. Upon activation, they bind to the antioxidant response element (ARE) in the promoter region of Trx and initiate transcription. There are also feedback mechanisms between these transcription factors and Trx. Active reduced Trx promotes Nrf2 binding by reducing cysteine residues in the DNA-binding domain of small musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma proteins (sMAF). The sMAF proteins can form a heterodimer with Nrf2 and stabilize its DNA binding, further enhancing Trx transcription [42]. Expression of Nrf2 and subsequently Trx can also upregulated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). AhR is a ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to the Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) family. In its inactive state, AhR is part of a complex with heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP), and p23 in the cytosol. Upon ligand binding, which includes a range of polycyclic hydrocarbons such as benzo[a]pyrene, dioxins, and furans, as well as indole derivatives, AhR is released and translocates to the nucleus. In the nucleus, AhR forms a dimer with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein (ARNT) and can induce anti-stress responses. Among other functions, AhR can induce the expression of Nrf2 and the Nrf2 target Trx [43,44].
In addition to its redox-active cysteine residues (Cys32 and Cys35), Trx has three non-active cysteine residues (Cys62, Cys69, and Cys73) that can be post-translationally modified, altering its activity. Trx can be glutathionylated at Cys73, preventing dimerization and inhibiting its enzymatic activity [45]. S-nitrosylation of Trx at Cys62, Cys69, or Cys73 also restricts its activity [46,47,48]. Trx can also be phosphorylated at threonine 100 (T100), influencing its activity [49].
Trx can also be inhibited through protein–protein interactions. Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip) binds to the active site of Trx1 via its cysteine residue Cys247. This binding results in inactivation of Trx1 activity [29,50,51,52,53]. Txnip-mediated inhibition of Trx is involved in inflammation and aging [54,55].

2.3.2. Regulation of Gene Expression via the Thioredoxin System

The majority of Trx1 is located in the cytosol, with a subpopulation in the nucleus [56]. Thus, Trx1 can act on transcription factors in the nucleus.
Trx1 reduces the redox factor-1 (Ref-1). Subsequently, Ref-1 reduces a conserved cysteine in the DNA-binding domain of the transcription factor activator protein-1 (AP-1), enhancing its DNA-binding activity. This redox-sensitive mechanism is crucial for AP-1 activation and the induction of AP-1 target gene expression [57,58,59,60].
Trx1 and reduced Ref-1 play an essential role in stabilizing the hypoxia-inducible factor α (HIF-1α). Once stabilized, HIF-1α forms a heterodimer with HIF-1β. The HIF-1α/HIF-1β dimer binds to hypoxia response elements (HREs) and initiates the transcription of genes involved in cellular adaptation to hypoxia [61,62].
In addition to AP-1 and HIF1α, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a crucial redox-sensitive transcription factor. NF-κB refers to dimeric transcription factors within the Rel family [59]. In the absence of activating signals, NF-κB is sequestered in the cytoplasm by binding to the inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB). Upon activation of the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, IκB is phosphorylated, marked for ubiquitination, and subsequently degraded. Degradation of IκB results in the exposure of the nuclear localization sequence of NF-κB, facilitating its translocation into the nucleus [63,64]—a process enhanced by a pro-oxidative environment in the cytosol and the oxidation of thiol groups within NF-κB [3,65,66,67,68]. In the nucleus, NF-κB has to be reduced to bind optimally to DNA, a task performed by Trx1 (Figure 3) [3,26,59].

2.3.3. Regulation of Cell Death via the Thioredoxin System

Trx influences the induction of apoptosis. In the cytosol, Trx1 can bind to the N-terminal non-catalytic region of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAP3K). This binding inhibits ASK1, preventing it from activating the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and the p38 MAP kinase pathway, which is necessary to initiate apoptosis. The interaction between Trx1 and ASK1 highly depends on the redox status of Trx1, with only the reduced form of Trx binding to ASK1 [29,69,70]. In addition, Trx1 can directly alter the stability of ASK1 by inducing the ubiquitination and degradation of ASK1. In this process, Trx1 interacts through a free thiol in its active site (Cys32 or Cys35) with a thiol group (Cys250) in ASK1 (Figure 4) [70,71].
Trx2 is crucial in controlling the accumulation of mitochondrial ROS. The absence of Trx2 leads to ROS accumulation, cytochrome c release from mitochondria, and induction of apoptosis [72]. Trx2 can also interact with ASK1 in mitochondria, blocking its activity. This process is similar to the inhibition of ASK1 in the cytosol by Trx1 [73]. Of note, Trx2 can maintain Bcl-xL levels in a redox-independent manner, protecting the outer mitochondrial membrane from permeabilization and thereby preventing the induction of apoptosis [74].

2.4. Secretion of Thioredoxin

In response to increased oxidative stress, Trx can be secreted by cells, although the precise mechanisms are not yet fully understood [75,76,77,78,79,80]. Thus, serum or plasma levels of Trx serve as a reliable, minimally invasive marker for oxidative stress in various diseases [75,76,81]. Trx serum levels are elevated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic cancer [82,83]. Since these levels return to normal after tumor resection, the tumor itself is likely the main source of the secreted Trx [82]. Elevated levels of extracellular Trx have been also detected in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). These Trx levels negatively correlate with reduced glutathione (GSH) levels, suggesting that HIV-infected individuals with AIDS experience elevated systemic oxidative stress [84,85]. Moreover, Trx is not only a marker in HIV infection but also plays a role in AIDS pathogenesis by reducing a disulfide bond in the HIV envelope glycoprotein gp120, facilitating CD4 binding and T cell entry [86,87]. In contrast to intracellular Trx, extracellular Trx does not appear to directly influence tumor proliferation. However, extracellular Trx provides protective effects against TNF- and ROS-induced apoptosis [88,89]. Extracellular Trx protects the tumor from the immune system [79,90]. Although most extracellular Trx is rapidly oxidized, it is likely that it can intercept therapeutic agents before they enter cells, potentially affecting the patient’s response to treatment.

2.5. The Thioredoxin System in Cancer

The Trx system is undoubtedly a double-edged sword. On one hand, it protects against oxidative damage, preventing the oxidation of macromolecules such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. This protects cells from the accumulation of mutations, thereby defending the organism from the development of malignancies.
An existing malignoma benefits from these protective mechanisms. Tumors often exhibit elevated ROS levels due to their metabolism. Trx prevents this increased ROS production from damaging and killing tumor cells. This increased proliferation due to the activation of transcription factors like NF-κB or AP-1 leads to faster tumor growth. Additionally, HIF-1α significantly promotes angiogenesis and metastasis formation. Activated HIF-1α induces various target genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) genes. VEGF promotes angiogenesis, while MMPs facilitate invasion and metastasis [91,92,93,94,95].
There is a correlation between the overexpression of components of the Trx system and multidrug resistance (MDR) [96]. In pancreatic cancer cells, higher Trx expression protects against cisplatin-induced apoptosis [97,98,99]. In KRAS wild-type colorectal carcinoma cells, increased TrxR2 expression is involved in the development of MDR [100]. It has been shown that Trx expression is increased to protect various cancers, leading to increased tumor aggressiveness and poorer overall survival [62,101,102,103], including in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) [104,105,106], lung cancer [102,107], pancreatic cancer [83], gastric cancer [108,109,110,111], hepatic cancer [82,112], breast cancer [113,114,115], and tumors of the hematopoietic system [26,116,117,118,119]. A correlation between the thioredoxin system and resistance to paclitaxel has also been observed. In ovarian cancer cells, it has been shown that Trx1 binds to the transcription factor forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) and induces its translocation to the nucleus, and thereby promotes the expression of FOXO1-dependent genes that protect the tumor from cell death [120]. Trx can also protect breast cancer cells from tamoxifen-induced apoptosis by directly scavenging H2O2 via Prx or inducing estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent redox-sensitive survival pathways [121]. Increased expression of the Trx system proteins is also associated with resistance to doxorubicin, docetaxel, and tamoxifen [62,99,122,123].
Therefore, the overexpression of Trx system components not only results in more aggressive, rapidly growing, and highly metastatic tumors, but also significantly limits treatment options and reduces patient survival. Thus, the individual components of the Trx system represent viable targets for cancer therapy.

3. Manipulation of the Thioredoxin System—Potential Therapeutic Approaches

The Trx system is essential for maintaining cellular redox balance and, together with Prx, acts as a crucial ROS scavenger. On one hand, it helps control oxidative signaling pathways, prevent oxidative damage, and reduce mutation accumulation, thus ensuring normal cell function and preventing cancer. On the other hand, the Trx system can protect established tumors from cell death and even promote their proliferation. Cancer cells often exhibit higher ROS levels, and the Trx system protects these cells from oxidation-induced cell death. Additionally, since the Trx system regulates proliferation-promoting transcription factors, it can further enhance the proliferation of malignancies.

3.1. Inhibition of Thioredoxin

Inhibiting Trx presents a promising target. Particularly interesting are the cysteines in the active site (Cys32 and Cys35), as well as cysteines Cys62, Cys69, and Cys73, which, although not located in the active site, regulate Trx activity.

3.1.1. 1-Methyl Propyl 2-Imidazolyl Disulfide (PX-12)

PX-12 is a small molecule originally discovered through a screening evaluating disulfide compounds for their inhibition of cancer cell proliferation [124,125,126]. PX-12 binds to Cys73 of Trx1, inhibiting the reduction of oxidized Trx1 by TrxR1. This leads to the accumulation of inactive, oxidized Trx1 [127,128]. It has been shown that PX-12 sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells to arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis [129]. In addition, PX-12 alone can induce cell death in AML cells [129]. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, PX-12 was also shown to induce cell death [130]. In an osteosarcoma model, PX-12 was also able to induce cell death and prevent metastasis formation [131]. In all these models, it is hypothesized that inhibition of Trx1 leads to a significant accumulation of ROS, which induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis (Figure 5A).
The efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of PX-12 in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer were investigated in a Phase I clinical study (NCT00736372) (Table 1) [132]. However, a Phase II clinical study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer was terminated early due to low Trx1 expression in the patients and a lack of treatment efficacy with PX-12 (NCT00177242) (Table 1) [133]. The authors of the study suggest selecting patients with elevated Trx1 expression for future studies and then repeating the trial. However, no data are currently available on this. It remains to be seen whether PX-12 will find a clinical application in cancer patients.

3.1.2. Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF)

Treatment of cells with DMF leads to modification of Cys73 in Trx1, similar to treatment with PX-12. DMF causes monomethyl-succinylation of this cysteine, resulting in the inactivation of Trx1. Active Trx1 is required in the nucleus to reduce NF-κB, enabling optimal binding to its DNA binding sites [26]. T-cell lymphomas with constitutive NF-κB activation, such as T-ALL and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), show dependence on NF-κB. When NF-κB is inhibited, these cells undergo cell death [8,26,134]. Inhibition of NF-κB by DMF leads to decreased expression of various target genes, including gens of anti-apoptotic proteins such as inhibitors of apoptosis (BIRC2 encoding for IAP1, BIRC3 encoding for IAP2, and X-Linked Inhibitor Of Apoptosis encoding for XIAP) and the gene for the FLICE-like inhibitory protein (CFLAR encoding for cFLIP). The downregulation of these proteins leads to the assembly of an intracellular death platform, the ripoptosome. The ripoptosome, whose activity is regulated by cFLIP, subsequently induces apoptosis or necroptosis if the apoptotic pathway is inhibited (Figure 5B) [26]. These data were also confirmed in a CTCL mouse model. The primary tumor showed significantly slower growth. In addition, metastasis was shown to be almost completely blocked [134].
A multicenter Phase II clinical study (NCT02546440) also demonstrated the efficacy of DMF in patients with CTCL (Table 1). DMF demonstrated its efficacy, particularly in patients suffering from the highly aggressive form of CTCL known as Sézary syndrome. Prolonged survival was observed in these patients. It is important to note that these patients also exhibited high constitutive NF-κB activation. The quality of life of the patients significantly improved, as skin lesions rapidly regressed immediately after the initiation of treatment. In addition, DMF is administered orally, which significantly reduces the burden on patients. Moreover, DMF showed almost no undesirable side effects in these patients [135]. A combination with Bcl-2 inhibitors was also investigated. It was shown that DMF and the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-199 (Venetoclax), as well as a combination with ABT-263 (Navitoclax), synergistically induced cell death in malignant T-cells isolated from CTCL patients [136]. DMF and ABT-199 also synergistically induced cell death in a mouse model [136], suggesting that this combination should be further investigated in clinical studies, as both DMF and ABT-199 are already in clinical use.
Table 1. Clinical studies on the inhibition of thioredoxin (Trx) for cancer therapy (for details, see the sections above).
Table 1. Clinical studies on the inhibition of thioredoxin (Trx) for cancer therapy (for details, see the sections above).
Study TitleStudy NumberStatusPublished Results
A Trial of PX-12 in Patients With a Histologically or Cytologically Confirmed Diagnosis of Advanced or Metastatic CancerNCT00736372Completed[132]
Study of Gefitinib and Docetaxel as Salvage Therapy in Advanced Pancreatic CarcinomaNCT00177242Prematurely terminated[133]
Study on Therapy With Dimethylfumarate (DMF) in Patients With Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) (DMF-CTCL)NCT02546440Completed[135]

3.1.3. 4-(benzothiazol-2-yl)-4-hydroxycyclohexa-2,5-dienone (PMX464)

PMX464 (previously named AW464) is a benzothiazole-substituted quinoline compound capable of binding all five cysteines in Trx-1, including Cys32 and Cys35 in the active site [137,138,139]. Consequently, PMX464 is a potent Trx-1 inhibitor currently undergoing preclinical evaluation [139]. Studies on colorectal and breast cancer cell lines have shown that PMX464 induces cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects [140,141]. In colon carcinoma cells, it has been shown that the effect of PMX464 is limited under normoxic conditions but becomes cytotoxic under hypoxia. Additionally, fibroblasts (even under hypoxic conditions) are relatively resistant to PMX464 compared to the tumor cell lines [141]. However, the identification of an optimal dose of the inhibitor will therefore be crucial to effectively use it as a hypoxic anti-tumorogenic therapy.

3.1.4. Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA)

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) like SAHA are agents that modify chromatin. Gene expression regulation depends on histone acetylation and deacetylation, mediating interactions between histone complexes and chromatin. HDACis inhibit histone deacetylation, leading to modulation of gene expression and prevention of chromatin condensation [128,142,143,144]. SAHA is a polar compound from the hydroxamate group of HDACis [145]. In prostate cancer cells, it has been shown that SAHA induces the expression of the Trx inhibitor TXNIP. TXNIP, in turn, inhibits Trx-1 and leads to oxidative stress in the tumor cells [146,147]. Therefore, indirect inhibition of Trx-1 via SAHA is an interesting option for tumor treatment.

3.1.5. Sodium Butyrate

Sodium butyrate is a short-chain fatty acid mainly produced by bacteria. It has been shown to reduce the activity of Trx-1 in colon carcinoma cells, while the activity of Trx-1 in healthy mucosal cells did not change after sodium butyrate treatment [148,149]. Sodium butyrate inhibits HDAC activity, acting as an HDAC inhibitor, leading to histone hyperacetylation. Similar to SAHA, sodium butyrate induces the expression of the natural Trx inhibitor TXNIP, which restricts Trx activity [149]. These results were also confirmed in in vivo studies, where treatment with sodium butyrate led to a reduction in tumor growth [104,148].

3.1.6. Isoforretin A (Iso A)

Diterpenoids are terpenoid compounds consisting of 20 carbon atoms arranged in four isoprene units. Iso A is a diterpenoid compound isolated from Isodon forrestii var. forrestii, a medicinal herb from China. Iso A can inhibit Trx-1, leading to an increase in ROS levels within cells, resulting in oxidative stress and cell death. In a colon carcinoma model, it was shown that Iso A not only inhibits Trx-1 activity but also induces chromatin condensation and fragmentation, leading to cell death [150].

3.1.7. Diallyl Trisulfide

Diallyl trisulfide, also known as allitridin, is an organosulfur compound derived from garlic. It can be formed through the hydrolysis of allicin. Through Michael addition, diallyl trisulfide directly conjugates to the Cys32 and Cys35 residues in the active site of Trx-1, thereby inhibiting it [151].
The predominant cause of high mortality in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is metastasis. It is suggested that Trx-1 plays an important role in breast cancer metastasis. Analyses in a nude mouse model of spontaneous and induced breast cancer metastasis showed that diallyl trisulfide leads to inhibition of Trx-1 and suppresses metastasis [151]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that diallyl trisulfide sensitizes glioblastoma cells to radiotherapy. This is likely directly related to the inactivation of Trx-1 and a weakening of the oxidative defense by diallyl trisulfide [152].

3.1.8. Eprenetapopt (APR-246, PRIMA-1Met)

In addition to thioredoxins, glutaredoxins (Grx) are involved in reducing disulfide bonds and reversing protein oxidations. There are four human Grx proteins: Grx1, located in the cytosol, mitochondrial intermembrane space, and nucleus; Grx2, located in the cytosol, mitochondria, and nucleus; Grx3, located in the cytosol and nucleus; and Grx5, located in the cytosol and mitochondria [153]. Grx contains a disulfide bridge in its active site and uses glutathione as a cofactor. Unlike Trx, Grx is reduced by glutathione rather than specific reductases. Due to the similar functions of Trx and Grx, and since Grx can serve as a backup system for TrxR to restore Trx activity, inhibitors that block both Trx and Grx are of particular clinical interest [153]. Eprenetapopt (APR-246, PRIMA-1Met), a small molecule originally developed to restore the activity of mutated, inactive p53, also inhibits Trx1 and Grx1 [154]. The extent of its effectivity on tumors in relation to Trx/Grx inhibition requires further investigation. Other interesting Grx inhibitors include the fungal toxin sporidesmin [155] and the chloroacetamido compound CWR-J02 [156].
Thus, the inhibition of Trx and Grx are potential targets for cancer treatment. PX-12 and DMF are two promising candidates for inhibiting Trx that are currently in clinical trials. However, it must always be considered that Trx and Grx play important physiological roles, which will undoubtedly be affected by the application of an inhibitor. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the correct dosage and achieve the highest possible specificity towards the tumor

3.2. Inhibition of Thioredoxin Reductase

TrxR is upregulated in many tumors, attracting increasing interest as an anti-cancer target. TrxR has an N-terminal redox center (Cys59/Cys64) that is sterically inaccessible and unsuitable for inhibitor development. Mammalian TrxRs possess an essential selenocysteine (Sec) residue at the C-terminus (Cys497/Sec498), which forms another redox-active site with an adjacent cysteine (Cys) via a selenolthiol/selenenylsulfide exchange reaction. This structure is on the protein surface, making it more accessible and suitable for inhibitor development [15].

3.2.1. Ethaselen

Ethaselen is an organoselenium TrxR inhibitor that exerts its antitumor effects through the induction of intrinsic (mitochondrial-induced) apoptosis in several cancer cells, including lung, stomach, cervical, and prostate cancer [157,158]. Ethaselen is currently being investigated in a Phase I clinical trial for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with elevated thioredoxin reductase activity (NCT02166242) (Table 2). The focus of this trial is on progression-free survival, quality of life, overall survival, and drug safety. The recruitment phase has been completed, but no results have been published yet.

3.2.2. Metal Complexes Targeting Thioredoxin Reductase—Auranofin

Various metal complexes that influence TrxR activity are used in cancer therapy, with platinum and gold complexes being particularly significant. Gold complexes, formed from gold ions with specific electronic properties, interact with reduced macromolecules, including reduced TrxR, and inhibit their function. Among these, the gold compound auranofin is the most effective TrxR inhibitor [15,39,159,160,161]. Platinum complexes (cisplatin, carboplatin) irreversibly inhibit TrxR. Interestingly, the activity of other reductases such as glutaredoxin or glutathione (GSH) reductase is not inhibited. This is due to platinum complexes having a higher affinity for the selenol residue in TrxR compared to the thiol groups present in other reductases [39,162]. These metal complex inhibitors efficiently block TrxR in both the cytosol and mitochondria. This blockade results in the release of ROS, which subsequently damages macromolecules such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. Particularly, the inhibition of TrxR2 in the mitochondria leads to massive ROS production and mitochondrial damage. The electron transport chain (ETC) complexes are also affected, resulting in further increased ROS production and significantly impairing energy production via the ETC.
For example, it has been shown that auranofin leads to an accumulation of ROS in colorectal carcinoma cells (Figure 6). This can sensitize malignant cells to radiation [163] and induce cell death by causing ROS-induced DNA damage [164]. Furthermore, it has been shown that auranofin can inhibit cancer cell proliferation, invasiveness, and metastasis, which has also been confirmed in colon carcinoma mouse models [163,165]. Also interesting are data from colon organoids. It was shown that cancer organoids responded much more effectively to auranofin compared to organoids derived from healthy tissue. Therefore, auranofin appears to exhibit a certain degree of tumor specificity [166]. In lung carcinoma cells, auranofin induces the accumulation of ROS and inhibition of glycolysis, leading to induction of cell death [167]. Auranofin also shows sensitizing effects in combination with other agents. In B-cells, high doses of L-ascorbate lead to autoxidation and the production of H2O2. This mechanism is mitigated by the Trx system. However, when TrxR is inhibited by auranofin, there is a significant induction of oxidative stress. Interestingly, in B-cells treated with the combination of auranofin and L-ascorbate, H2O2 reacts with iron (Fe)2+ in the so-called Fenton reaction, generating ●OH, which cause lipid peroxidation and subsequently trigger ferroptosis [168,169]. In ovarian cancer cells that were resistant to platinum treatment, ROS-dependent cell death could be effectively induced with auranofin in combination with selenite or tellurite [170]. In breast cancer cell lines, a synergistic effect of auranofin and mesupron, a small molecule that inhibits urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), was demonstrated [171]. Due to promising results, four clinical trials with auranofin are currently underway for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (NCT01419691), ovarian cancer (NCT01747798, NCT03456700), and recurrent lung cancer (NCT01737502). However, no results of the studies have been released yet (Table 2).
In the search for more efficient hydrophilic, water-soluble metal complexes, Casini and colleagues demonstrated that various mono- and binuclear gold(I) complexes with sulfonate and hydroxyl groups are capable of inhibiting TrxR [172,173] and inducing apoptosis in various cancer models [172,173,174,175,176].

3.2.3. Curcumin

Curcumin is extracted from Curcuma longa, a plant species belonging to the ginger family (Zingiberaceae). anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties are attributed to curcumin. It has been reported that curcumin inhibits, among others, NF-κB and TrxR [177]. Curcumin hinders the activity of TrxR by binding to its active site and disrupting the electron transfer from NADPH to TrxR [178]. Several studies show that curcumin leads to an accumulation of ROS in tumor cells, inhibiting metastasis formation and inducing cell death and/or sensitizing the cells to radiation [179].
Curcumin exhibits limitations for potential clinical applications due to its poor water solubility. Therefore, analogues have been developed, such as WZ26, which inhibits TrxR and restricts the proliferation and survival of tumor cells [180]. Currently, additional analogues are being developed and tested [113].
Several clinical studies have already been conducted on curcumin. In a Phase I trial with theracurmin, a curcumin derivative that demonstrates higher bioavailability than curcumin, it was shown that a combination with irinotecan is safe and well-tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT04028739) [181]. Another clinical study on patients with colorectal carcinoma and unresectable metastases demonstrated that a combination treatment of bevacizumab/FOLFIRI with a ginsenoside-modified nanostructured lipid carrier containing curcumin resulted in an overall 1-year survival rate of 87.4% (NCT02439385) [182]. In a Phase II clinical study, patients were treated either with FOLFOX (folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin) or with a combination of FOLFOX and curcumin. The combination therapy showed no significant side effects and was deemed safe. Although a slightly improved overall survival rate was observed, there were no significant improvements in quality of life or reduction in neurotoxicity compared to the FOLFOX treatment alone (NCT01490996) [183] (Table 2). In additional studies that have been completed but have not yet released results, curcumin has been investigated for the treatment of colorectal carcinoma (NCT00027495, NCT01859858), prostate cancer (NCT03211104), and breast cancer (NCT03847623) (Table 2). Another study on the treatment of leukemia (NCT05045443) has completed the recruitment phase, while studies on cervical cancer (NCT06080841) and prostate cancer (NCT02064673) are still in the recruitment phase. Initial results are expected in 2025 and 2026, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2. Clinical studies on the inhibition of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) for cancer therapy (for details, see the sections above).
Table 2. Clinical studies on the inhibition of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) for cancer therapy (for details, see the sections above).
Study TitleStudy NumberStatusPublished Results
Ethaselen for the Treatment of Thioredoxin Reductase High Expression Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung CancersNCT02166242Recruitment completed; analysis pending; last update 2022No data posted
Phase I and II Study of Auranofin in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)NCT01419691CompletedNo data posted
Auranofin in Treating Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube CancerNCT01747798CompletedNo data posted
Auranofin and Sirolimus in Treating Participants With Ovarian CancerNCT03456700Recruitment completed; analysis pending; last update 2024No data posted
Sirolimus and Auranofin in Treating Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer or Small Cell Lung CancerNCT01737502Recruitment completed; analysis pending; last update 2023No data posted
Theracurmin vs. Curcumin Bioavailability StudyNCT04028739Completed[181]
Avastin/FOLFIRI in Combination With Curcumin in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable MetastasisNCT02439385Completed[182]
Combining Curcumin With FOLFOX Chemotherapy in Patients With Inoperable Colorectal Cancer (CUFOX)NCT01490996Completed[183]
Curcumin for the Prevention of Colon CancerNCT00027495CompletedNo data posted
Effect of Curcumin on Dose Limiting Toxicity and Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in Patients With Solid TumorsNCT01859858Recruitment completed; analysis pending; last update 2023No data posted
Comparison of Duration of Treatment Interruption With or Without Curcumin During the Off Treatment Periods in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Intermittent Androgen Deprivation TherapyNCT03211104CompletedNo data posted
Effect of Preoperative Curcumin in Breast Cancer Patients (EPC)NCT03847623Unknown statusNo data posted
Safety and Efficacy of Curcumin in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (CurcumPedALL)NCT05045443Recruitment completed; analysis pendingResults are expected in end of 2024
Curcumin Supplementation in Cervical Cancer NCT06080841RecruitingResults are expected in 2025
Adjuvant Curcumin to Assess Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients Who Have Had a Radical ProstatectomyNCT02064673RecruitingResults are expected in 2026

3.2.4. Piperlongumine

Piperlongumine is an alkaloid extracted from long pepper plants (Piper longum L.). Piperlongumine inhibits TrxR [184]. It has been shown that piperlongumine-treated cancer cells accumulate ROS, leading to DNA damage, which sensitizes the cells to radiation [184,185]. These studies were conducted in vitro on cell lines. Only one study describes an additive effect with oxaliplatin in a colon cancer mouse model [186]. Due to the limited data, further studies are needed to determine if piperlongumine could be a viable option for tumor treatment and clinical application.

3.2.5. Isodeoxyelephantopin

Isodeoxyelephantopin is a compound isolated from Elephantopus scaber L., a tropical flowering plant of the Asteraceae family. This medicinal plant is known for its anticancer properties [187]. Isodeoxyelephantopin inhibits TrxR and induces ROS accumulation, leading to the activation of the JNK signaling pathway and apoptosis. When combined with the glutamate-cysteine ligase inhibitor buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), which decreases GSH levels, the two substances synergistically induce apoptosis [188]. Additionally, treatment with isodeoxyelephantopin, both as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin, has reduced colorectal tumor growth in a mouse model [188].

4. Conclusions

Organisms have to manage ROS, which arise either as byproducts of enzymatic reactions or are intentionally generated for signaling. Maintaining redox balance is crucial to prevent oxidative damage and support effective signaling. The Trx system and other redox regulators maintain this balance. Dysregulation can lead to cellular damage and tissue degradation and promote malignancies. Tumor cells, with their altered metabolism, often have increased ROS production and express higher amounts of antioxidant proteins, including components of the Trx system. This makes the Trx system a potential target for cancer treatment. However, its essential role in healthy cells and in regulating oxidative signals related to survival and proliferation presents a challenge for therapeutic targeting.
Despite these challenges, Trx and TrxR inhibitors show promise in clinical trials (Table 1 and Table 2). Studies with PX-12 and DMF suggest that carefully selected doses can target malignant cells based on elevated Trx-1 expression to minimize the impact on healthy tissue. Combination therapies, like DMF with Bcl-2 inhibitors, further reduce the required therapeutic doses, helping to protect healthy cells. Indirect inhibition strategies, such as using HDACi SAHA to induce TXNIP, an endogenous Trx inhibitor, also offer the potential for selectively targeting tumors with elevated Trx levels. However, more research is needed to validate this approach. The same applies to TrxR; it is crucial to predominantly target tumor cells, as they are particularly reliant on the Trx system. Among TrxR inhibitors, metal complexes like auranofin stand out. Auranofin sensitizes tumor cells to oxidative stress, especially in combination with irradiation. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring its clinical utility. Similar considerations apply to the organoselenium TrxR inhibitor Ethaselen. The efficacy of curcumin is difficult to assess due to often inaccurate or misleading in vitro results. The mechanism of curcumin is complex, particularly the role of TrxR inhibition, as curcumin can influence many signaling pathways. However, clinical studies suggest curcumin could be a potential option for cancer therapy.
In summary, the Trx system is vital for maintaining cellular redox balance, protecting against oxidative damage, and regulating cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation (Figure 7). It also plays a key role in neoangiogenesis, which is crucial for both organism survival and tumor growth. In tumors, the Trx system supports resistance to cell death, stress protection, and nutrient supply via neovascularization, increasing metastasis risk. This makes the Trx system a critical target for cancer therapy, although the challenge lies in specifically targeting the tumor’s Trx system or normalizing its upregulated activity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.G. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, C.K., D.T., P.H., A.K., S.S. and M.M.; visualization, R.S.; supervision, K.G.; funding acquisition, D.T. and K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Wilhelm-Sander Stiftung, grant number: 2022.096.1.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge all authors for their support, engagement, and expertise during the conceptualization, review, and visualization phases of this paper. Special thanks go to Elisabeth Aschenbrenner and Kirstin Pollinger for proofreading the manuscript. Additionally, we are grateful to the Wilhelm-Sander Stiftung for their generous funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Case, A.J. On the Origin of Superoxide Dismutase: An Evolutionary Perspective of Superoxide-Mediated Redox Signaling. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gülow, K.; Tümen, D.; Heumann, P.; Schmid, S.; Kandulski, A.; Müller, M.; Kunst, C. Unraveling the Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in T Lymphocyte Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reth, M. Hydrogen peroxide as second messenger in lymphocyte activation. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: A radical therapeutic approach? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Robert, M.; Kennedy, B.K.; Crasta, K.C. Therapy-induced senescence through the redox lens. Redox Biol. 2024, 74, 103228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, K.; Fan, C.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.; Lu, C.; Shao, H.; Xi, Y. Role of oxidative stress-induced ferroptosis in cancer therapy. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2024, 28, e18399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kiessling, M.K.; Klemke, C.D.; Kaminski, M.M.; Galani, I.E.; Krammer, P.H.; Gülow, K. Inhibition of constitutively activated nuclear factor-kappaB induces reactive oxygen species- and iron-dependent cell death in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2365–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dröge, W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 47–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flohé, L. Looking Back at the Early Stages of Redox Biology. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kunst, C.; Schmid, S.; Michalski, M.; Tümen, D.; Buttenschön, J.; Müller, M.; Gülow, K. The Influence of Gut Microbiota on Oxidative Stress and the Immune System. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dröge, W. Aging-related changes in the thiol/disulfide redox state: Implications for the use of thiol antioxidants. Exp. Gerontol. 2002, 37, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rampon, C.; Volovitch, M.; Joliot, A.; Vriz, S. Hydrogen Peroxide and Redox Regulation of Developments. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meister, A.; Anderson, M.E. Glutathione. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1983, 52, 711–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bian, M.; Fan, R.; Zhao, S.; Liu, W. Targeting the Thioredoxin System as a Strategy for Cancer Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 7309–7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, Q.; Zhang, J. Novel strategies for targeting the thioredoxin system for cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2022, 17, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Han, X.; Liu, R.; Fang, J. Targeting the Thioredoxin System for Cancer Therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Holmgren, A.; Johansson, C.; Berndt, C.; Lönn, M.E.; Hudemann, C.; Lillig, C.H. Thiol redox control via thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 1375–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghareeb, H.; Metanis, N. The Thioredoxin System: A Promising Target for Cancer Drug Development. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 10175–10184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nordberg, J.; Arnér, E.S. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants, and the mammalian thioredoxin system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 1287–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eklund, H.; Gleason, F.K.; Holmgren, A. Structural and functional relations among thioredoxins of different species. Proteins 1991, 11, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gasdaska, J.R.; Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Montfort, W.; Kuperus, M.; Hill, S.R.; Berggren, M.; Powis, G. Oxidative inactivation of thioredoxin as a cellular growth factor and protection by a Cys73 → Ser mutation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996, 52, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Haendeler, J. Thioredoxin-1 and posttranslational modifications. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hashemy, S.I.; Holmgren, A. Regulation of the catalytic activity and structure of human thioredoxin 1 via oxidation and S-nitrosylation of cysteine residues. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 21890–21898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Weichsel, A.; Gasdaska, J.R.; Powis, G.; Montfort, W.R. Crystal structures of reduced, oxidized, and mutated human thioredoxins: Evidence for a regulatory homodimer. Structure 1996, 4, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schroeder, A.; Warnken, U.; Röth, D.; Klika, K.D.; Vobis, D.; Barnert, A.; Bujupi, F.; Oberacker, T.; Schnölzer, M.; Nicolay, J.P.; et al. Targeting Thioredoxin-1 by dimethyl fumarate induces ripoptosome-mediated cell death. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. The thioredoxin antioxidant system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 66, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hanschmann, E.-M.; Godoy, J.R.; Berndt, C.; Hudemann, C.; Lillig, C.H. Thioredoxins, glutaredoxins, and peroxiredoxins—molecular mechanisms and health significance: From cofactors to antioxidants to redox signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 1539–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oberacker, T.; Kraft, L.; Schanz, M.; Latus, J.; Schricker, S. The Importance of Thioredoxin-1 in Health and Disease. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arnér, E.S.; Holmgren, A. Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 6102–6109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hassouni, M.E.; Chambost, J.P.; Expert, D.; van Gijsegem, F.; Barras, F. The minimal gene set member msrA, encoding peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase, is a virulence determinant of the plant pathogen Erwinia chrysanthemi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brot, N.; Weissbach, H. Biochemistry of methionine sulfoxide residues in proteins. Biofactors 1991, 3, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lee, S.R.; Kim, J.R.; Kwon, K.S.; Yoon, H.W.; Levine, R.L.; Ginsburg, A.; Rhee, S.G. Molecular cloning and characterization of a mitochondrial selenocysteine-containing thioredoxin reductase from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 4722–4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Espinosa, B.; Arnér, E.S.J. Thioredoxin-related protein of 14 kDa as a modulator of redox signalling pathways. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jeong, W.; Yoon, H.W.; Lee, S.-R.; Rhee, S.G. Identification and characterization of TRP14, a thioredoxin-related protein of 14 kDa. New insights into the specificity of thioredoxin function. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 3142–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brandstaedter, C.; Fritz-Wolf, K.; Weder, S.; Fischer, M.; Hecker, B.; Rahlfs, S.; Becker, K. Kinetic characterization of wild-type and mutant human thioredoxin glutathione reductase defines its reaction and regulatory mechanisms. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 542–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rendón, J.L.; Miranda-Leyva, M.; Guevara-Flores, A.; Martínez-González, J.d.J.; Del Arenal, I.P.; Flores-Herrera, O.; Pardo, J.P. Insight into the Mechanistic Basis of the Hysteretic-Like Kinetic Behavior of Thioredoxin-Glutathione Reductase (TGR). Enzyme Res. 2018, 2018, 3215462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, Q.-A.; Su, D.; Novoselov, S.V.; Carlson, B.A.; Hatfield, D.L.; Gladyshev, V.N. Reaction mechanism and regulation of mammalian thioredoxin/glutathione reductase. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 14528–14537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jastrząb, A.; Skrzydlewska, E. Thioredoxin-dependent system. Application of inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021, 36, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hawkes, H.-J.K.; Karlenius, T.C.; Tonissen, K.F. Regulation of the human thioredoxin gene promoter and its key substrates: A study of functional and putative regulatory elements. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tonelli, C.; Chio, I.I.C.; Tuveson, D.A. Transcriptional Regulation by Nrf2. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 29, 1727–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, Y.-C.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kondo, N.; Masutani, H.; Yodoi, J. Thioredoxin-dependent redox regulation of the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) in electrophile response. Oncogene 2003, 22, 1860–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hirabayashi, Y.; Inoue, T. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology and xenobiotic responses in hematopoietic progenitor cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 77, 521–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Grishanova, A.Y.; Perepechaeva, M.L. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Oxidative Stress as a Double Agent and Its Biological and Therapeutic Significance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Casagrande, S.; Bonetto, V.; Fratelli, M.; Gianazza, E.; Eberini, I.; Massignan, T.; Salmona, M.; Chang, G.; Holmgren, A.; Ghezzi, P. Glutathionylation of human thioredoxin: A possible crosstalk between the glutathione and thioredoxin systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9745–9749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mitchell, D.A.; Marletta, M.A. Thioredoxin catalyzes the S-nitrosation of the caspase-3 active site cysteine. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wu, C.; Liu, T.; Chen, W.; Oka, S.; Fu, C.; Jain, M.R.; Parrott, A.M.; Baykal, A.T.; Sadoshima, J.; Li, H. Redox regulatory mechanism of transnitrosylation by thioredoxin. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2010, 9, 2262–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Haendeler, J.; Hoffmann, J.; Tischler, V.; Berk, B.C.; Zeiher, A.M.; Dimmeler, S. Redox regulatory and anti-apoptotic functions of thioredoxin depend on S-nitrosylation at cysteine 69. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, X.; Tang, W.; Liu, S.; Yu, L.; Chen, Z. Thioredoxin-1 phosphorylated at T100 is needed for its anti-apoptotic activity in HepG2 cancer cells. Life Sci. 2010, 87, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nishiyama, A.; Matsui, M.; Iwata, S.; Hirota, K.; Masutani, H.; Nakamura, H.; Takagi, Y.; Sono, H.; Gon, Y.; Yodoi, J. Identification of thioredoxin-binding protein-2/vitamin D(3) up-regulated protein 1 as a negative regulator of thioredoxin function and expression. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 21645–21650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yamanaka, H.; Maehira, F.; Oshiro, M.; Asato, T.; Yanagawa, Y.; Takei, H.; Nakashima, Y. A possible interaction of thioredoxin with VDUP1 in HeLa cells detected in a yeast two-hybrid system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 271, 796–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Schulze, P.C.; Yoshioka, J.; Takahashi, T.; He, Z.; King, G.L.; Lee, R.T. Hyperglycemia promotes oxidative stress through inhibition of thioredoxin function by thioredoxin-interacting protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 30369–30374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Patwari, P.; Higgins, L.J.; Chutkow, W.A.; Yoshioka, J.; Lee, R.T. The interaction of thioredoxin with Txnip. Evidence for formation of a mixed disulfide by disulfide exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21884–21891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cao, X.; He, W.; Pang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Qin, A. Redox-dependent and independent effects of thioredoxin interacting protein. Biol. Chem. 2020, 401, 1215–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Oberacker, T.; Bajorat, J.; Ziola, S.; Schroeder, A.; Röth, D.; Kastl, L.; Edgar, B.A.; Wagner, W.; Gülow, K.; Krammer, P.H. Enhanced expression of thioredoxin-interacting-protein regulates oxidative DNA damage and aging. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 2297–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Holmgren, A.; Luthman, M. Tissue distrubution and subcellular localization of bovine thioredoxin determined by radioimmunoassay. Biochemistry 1978, 17, 4071–4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ding, M.; Li, J.J.; Leonard, S.S.; Ye, J.P.; Shi, X.; Colburn, N.H.; Castranova, V.; Vallyathan, V. Vanadate-induced activation of activator protein-1: Role of reactive oxygen species. Carcinogenesis 1999, 20, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hirota, K.; Matsui, M.; Iwata, S.; Nishiyama, A.; Mori, K.; Yodoi, J. AP-1 transcriptional activity is regulated by a direct association between thioredoxin and Ref-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 3633–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hong, Y.; Boiti, A.; Vallone, D.; Foulkes, N.S. Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling and Oxidative Stress: Transcriptional Regulation and Evolution. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abate, C.; Patel, L.; Rauscher, F.J.; Curran, T. Redox regulation of fos and jun DNA-binding activity in vitro. Science 1990, 249, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, L.E.; Arany, Z.; Livingston, D.M.; Bunn, H.F. Activation of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor depends primarily upon redox-sensitive stabilization of its alpha subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 32253–32259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karlenius, T.C.; Tonissen, K.F. Thioredoxin and Cancer: A Role for Thioredoxin in all States of Tumor Oxygenation. Cancers 2010, 2, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, Y.; Wange, R.L. T cell receptor signaling: Beyond complex complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 28827–28830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rothwarf, D.M.; Karin, M. The NF-kappa B activation pathway: A paradigm in information transfer from membrane to nucleus. Sci. STKE 1999, 1999, RE1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Schreck, R.; Rieber, P.; Baeuerle, P.A. Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-kappa B transcription factor and HIV-1. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 2247–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Israël, N.; Gougerot-Pocidalo, M.A.; Aillet, F.; Virelizier, J.L. Redox status of cells influences constitutive or induced NF-kappa B translocation and HIV long terminal repeat activity in human T and monocytic cell lines. J. Immunol. 1992, 149, 3386–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaminski, M.M.; Sauer, S.W.; Klemke, C.-D.; Süss, D.; Okun, J.G.; Krammer, P.H.; Gülow, K. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species control T cell activation by regulating IL-2 and IL-4 expression: Mechanism of ciprofloxacin-mediated immunosuppression. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 4827–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kamiński, M.M.; Röth, D.; Krammer, P.H.; Gülow, K. Mitochondria as oxidative signaling organelles in T-cell activation: Physiological role and pathological implications. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2013, 61, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Saitoh, M.; Nishitoh, H.; Fujii, M.; Takeda, K.; Tobiume, K.; Sawada, Y.; Kawabata, M.; Miyazono, K.; Ichijo, H. Mammalian thioredoxin is a direct inhibitor of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (ASK) 1. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 2596–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. Thioredoxin system in cell death progression. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 17, 1738–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Y.; Min, W. Thioredoxin promotes ASK1 ubiquitination and degradation to inhibit ASK1-mediated apoptosis in a redox activity-independent manner. Circ. Res. 2002, 90, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tanaka, T.; Hosoi, F.; Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Masutani, H.; Ueda, S.; Nishiyama, A.; Takeda, S.; Wada, H.; Spyrou, G.; et al. Thioredoxin-2 (TRX-2) is an essential gene regulating mitochondria-dependent apoptosis. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhang, R.; Al-Lamki, R.; Bai, L.; Streb, J.W.; Miano, J.M.; Bradley, J.; Min, W. Thioredoxin-2 inhibits mitochondria-located ASK1-mediated apoptosis in a JNK-independent manner. Circ. Res. 2004, 94, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, D.; Masutani, H.; Oka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Yodoi, J. Control of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and Bcl-xL levels by thioredoxin 2 in DT40 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 7384–7391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nakamura, H. Extracellular functions of thioredoxin. Novartis Found. Symp. 2008, 291, 184–192; discussion 192–195, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nakamura, H.; Masutani, H.; Yodoi, J. Extracellular thioredoxin and thioredoxin-binding protein 2 in control of cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kondo, N.; Ishii, Y.; Kwon, Y.-W.; Tanito, M.; Horita, H.; Nishinaka, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Yodoi, J. Redox-sensing release of human thioredoxin from T lymphocytes with negative feedback loops. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rubartelli, A.; Bajetto, A.; Allavena, G.; Wollman, E.; Sitia, R. Secretion of thioredoxin by normal and neoplastic cells through a leaderless secretory pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 24161–24164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Söderberg, A.; Sahaf, B.; Rosén, A. Thioredoxin reductase, a redox-active selenoprotein, is secreted by normal and neoplastic cells: Presence in human plasma. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar]
  80. Pekkari, K.; Avila-Cariño, J.; Bengtsson, A.; Gurunath, R.; Scheynius, A.; Holmgren, A. Truncated thioredoxin (Trx80) induces production of interleukin-12 and enhances CD14 expression in human monocytes. Blood 2001, 97, 3184–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Burke-Gaffney, A.; Callister, M.E.J.; Nakamura, H. Thioredoxin: Friend or foe in human disease? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005, 26, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Miyazaki, K.; Noda, N.; Okada, S.; Hagiwara, Y.; Miyata, M.; Sakurabayashi, I.; Yamaguchi, N.; Sugimura, T.; Terada, M.; Wakasugi, H. Elevated serum level of thioredoxin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Biotherapy 1998, 11, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Nakamura, H.; Bai, J.; Nishinaka, Y.; Ueda, S.; Sasada, T.; Ohshio, G.; Imamura, M.; Takabayashi, A.; Yamaoka, Y.; Yodoi, J. Expression of thioredoxin and glutaredoxin, redox-regulating proteins, in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2000, 24, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  84. Nakamura, H.; de Rosa, S.C.; Yodoi, J.; Holmgren, A.; Ghezzi, P.; Herzenberg, L.A. Chronic elevation of plasma thioredoxin: Inhibition of chemotaxis and curtailment of life expectancy in AIDS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2688–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nakamura, H.; de Rosa, S.; Roederer, M.; Anderson, M.T.; Dubs, J.G.; Yodoi, J.; Holmgren, A.; Herzenberg, L.A. Elevation of plasma thioredoxin levels in HIV-infected individuals. Int. Immunol. 1996, 8, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Azimi, I.; Matthias, L.J.; Center, R.J.; Wong, J.W.H.; Hogg, P.J. Disulfide bond that constrains the HIV-1 gp120 V3 domain is cleaved by thioredoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 40072–40080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. DiRaimondo, T.R.; Plugis, N.M.; Jin, X.; Khosla, C. Selective inhibition of extracellular thioredoxin by asymmetric disulfides. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Matsuda, M.; Masutani, H.; Nakamura, H.; Miyajima, S.; Yamauchi, A.; Yonehara, S.; Uchida, A.; Irimajiri, K.; Horiuchi, A.; Yodoi, J. Protective activity of adult T cell leukemia-derived factor (ADF) against tumor necrosis factor-dependent cytotoxicity on U937 cells. J. Immunol. 1991, 147, 3837–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Nakamura, H.; Matsuda, M.; Furuke, K.; Kitaoka, Y.; Iwata, S.; Toda, K.; Inamoto, T.; Yamaoka, Y.; Ozawa, K.; Yodoi, J. Adult T cell leukemia-derived factor/human thioredoxin protects endothelial F-2 cell injury caused by activated neutrophils or hydrogen peroxide. Immunol. Lett. 1994, 42, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Matsuo, Y.; Yodoi, J. Extracellular thioredoxin: A therapeutic tool to combat inflammation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013, 24, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bui, B.P.; Nguyen, P.L.; Lee, K.; Cho, J. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1: A Novel Therapeutic Target for the Management of Cancer, Drug Resistance, and Cancer-Related Pain. Cancers 2022, 14, 6054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Castro-Castro, A.; Marchesin, V.; Monteiro, P.; Lodillinsky, C.; Rossé, C.; Chavrier, P. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of MT1-MMP-Dependent Cancer Cell Invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 32, 555–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Dunn, L.L.; Buckle, A.M.; Cooke, J.P.; Ng, M.K.C. The emerging role of the thioredoxin system in angiogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 2089–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Farina, A.R.; Cappabianca, L.; DeSantis, G.; Di Ianni, N.; Ruggeri, P.; Ragone, M.; Merolle, S.; Tonissen, K.F.; Gulino, A.; Mackay, A.R. Thioredoxin stimulates MMP-9 expression, de-regulates the MMP-9/TIMP-1 equilibrium and promotes MMP-9 dependent invasion in human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 3328–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Oh, J.-H.; Chung, A.-S.; Steinbrenner, H.; Sies, H.; Brenneisen, P. Thioredoxin secreted upon ultraviolet A irradiation modulates activities of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in human dermal fibroblasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 423, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jovanović, M.; Podolski-Renić, A.; Krasavin, M.; Pešić, M. The Role of the Thioredoxin Detoxification System in Cancer Progression and Resistance. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 883297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Arnold, N.B.; Ketterer, K.; Kleeff, J.; Friess, H.; Büchler, M.W.; Korc, M. Thioredoxin is downstream of Smad7 in a pathway that promotes growth and suppresses cisplatin-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 3599–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Björkhem-Bergman, L.; Jönsson, K.; Eriksson, L.C.; Olsson, J.M.; Lehmann, S.; Paul, C.; Björnstedt, M. Drug-resistant human lung cancer cells are more sensitive to selenium cytotoxicity. Effects on thioredoxin reductase and glutathione reductase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 63, 1875–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sasada, T.; Iwata, S.; Sato, N.; Kitaoka, Y.; Hirota, K.; Nakamura, K.; Nishiyama, A.; Taniguchi, Y.; Takabayashi, A.; Yodoi, J. Redox control of resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP): Protective effect of human thioredoxin against CDDP-induced cytotoxicity. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 97, 2268–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Du, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, T.; Gao, W.; Wu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Wei, D.; Gao, C.; Li, Q. Targeting a Sirt5-Positive Subpopulation Overcomes Multidrug Resistance in Wild-Type Kras Colorectal Carcinomas. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 2677–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Arnér, E.S.J.; Holmgren, A. The thioredoxin system in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gasdaska, P.Y.; Oblong, J.E.; Cotgreave, I.A.; Powis, G. The predicted amino acid sequence of human thioredoxin is identical to that of the autocrine growth factor human adult T-cell derived factor (ADF): Thioredoxin mRNA is elevated in some human tumors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1994, 1218, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Raffel, J.; Bhattacharyya, A.K.; Gallegos, A.; Cui, H.; Einspahr, J.G.; Alberts, D.S.; Powis, G. Increased expression of thioredoxin-1 in human colorectal cancer is associated with decreased patient survival. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2003, 142, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abdullah, N.A.; Md Hashim, N.F.; Muhamad Zakuan, N.; Chua, J.X. Thioredoxin system in colorectal cancer: Its role in carcinogenesis, disease progression, and response to treatment. Life Sci. 2024, 348, 122711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lin, F.; Zhang, P.; Zuo, Z.; Wang, F.; Bi, R.; Shang, W.; Wu, A.; Ye, J.; Li, S.; Sun, X.; et al. Thioredoxin-1 promotes colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis through crosstalk with S100P. Cancer Lett. 2017, 401, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Berggren, M.; Gallegos, A.; Gasdaska, J.R.; Gasdaska, P.Y.; Warneke, J.; Powis, G. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase gene expression in human tumors and cell lines, and the effects of serum stimulation and hypoxia. Anticancer Res. 1996, 16, 3459–3466. [Google Scholar]
  107. Kakolyris, S.; Giatromanolaki, A.; Koukourakis, M.; Powis, G.; Souglakos, J.; Sivridis, E.; Georgoulias, V.; Gatter, K.C.; Harris, A.L. Thioredoxin expression is associated with lymph node status and prognosis in early operable non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 3087–3091. [Google Scholar]
  108. Lim, J.Y.; Yoon, S.O.; Hong, S.W.; Kim, J.W.; Choi, S.H.; Cho, J.Y. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin-interacting protein as prognostic markers for gastric cancer recurrence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 5581–5588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Duangkumpha, K.; Stoll, T.; Phetcharaburanin, J.; Yongvanit, P.; Thanan, R.; Techasen, A.; Namwat, N.; Khuntikeo, N.; Chamadol, N.; Roytrakul, S.; et al. Discovery and Qualification of Serum Protein Biomarker Candidates for Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnosis. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 3305–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nagano, M.; Hatakeyama, K.; Kai, M.; Nakamura, H.; Yodoi, J.; Asada, Y.; Chijiiwa, K. Nuclear expression of thioredoxin-1 in the invasion front is associated with outcome in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. HPB 2012, 14, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shang, W.; Xie, Z.; Lu, F.; Fang, D.; Tang, T.; Bi, R.; Chen, L.; Jiang, L. Increased Thioredoxin-1 Expression Promotes Cancer Progression and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9291683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tamai, T.; Uto, H.; Takami, Y.; Oda, K.; Saishoji, A.; Hashiguchi, M.; Kumagai, K.; Kure, T.; Mawatari, S.; Moriuchi, A.; et al. Serum manganese superoxide dismutase and thioredoxin are potential prognostic markers for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 17, 4890–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Abdullah, N.A.; Inman, M.; Moody, C.J.; Storr, S.J.; Martin, S.G. Cytotoxic and radiosensitising effects of a novel thioredoxin reductase inhibitor in breast cancer. Investig. New Drugs 2021, 39, 1232–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bhatia, M.; McGrath, K.L.; Di Trapani, G.; Charoentong, P.; Shah, F.; King, M.M.; Clarke, F.M.; Tonissen, K.F. The thioredoxin system in breast cancer cell invasion and migration. Redox Biol. 2016, 8, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cha, M.-K.; Suh, K.-H.; Kim, I.-H. Overexpression of peroxiredoxin I and thioredoxin1 in human breast carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 28, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kari, E.J.M.; Kuusisto, M.E.L.; Honkavaara, P.; Hakalahti, A.; Haapasaari, K.-M.; Bloigu, R.; Karihtala, P.; Teppo, H.-R.; Pirinen, R.; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T.; et al. Thioredoxin-1 as a biological predictive marker for selecting diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients for etoposide-containing treatment. Eur. J. Haematol. 2020, 105, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Li, C.; Thompson, M.A.; Tamayo, A.T.; Zuo, Z.; Lee, J.; Vega, F.; Ford, R.J.; Pham, L.V. Over-expression of Thioredoxin-1 mediates growth, survival, and chemoresistance and is a druggable target in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget 2012, 3, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Peroja, P.; Pasanen, A.K.; Haapasaari, K.-M.; Jantunen, E.; Soini, Y.; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T.; Bloigu, R.; Lilja, L.; Kuittinen, O.; Karihtala, P. Oxidative stress and redox state-regulating enzymes have prognostic relevance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2012, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shao, L.; Diccianni, M.B.; Tanaka, T.; Gribi, R.; Yu, A.L.; Pullen, J.D.; Camitta, B.M.; Yu, J. Thioredoxin expression in primary T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its therapeutic implication. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 7333–7338. [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Li, W.; Xu, H.; Yang, X.; Gan, L. Thioredoxin 1 upregulates FOXO1 transcriptional activity in drug resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1852, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Penney, R.B.; Roy, D. Thioredoxin-mediated redox regulation of resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1836, 60–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Holmgren, A.; Lu, J. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase: Current research with special reference to human disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 396, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kim, S.J.; Miyoshi, Y.; Taguchi, T.; Tamaki, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Yodoi, J.; Kato, K.; Noguchi, S. High thioredoxin expression is associated with resistance to docetaxel in primary breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 8425–8430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Powis, G.; Kirkpatrick, D.L. Thioredoxin signaling as a target for cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007, 7, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kunkel, M.W.; Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Johnson, J.I.; Powis, G. Cell line-directed screening assay for inhibitors of thioredoxin reductase signaling as potential anti-cancer drugs. Anticancer Drug Des. 1997, 12, 659–670. [Google Scholar]
  126. Jiang, H.; Zuo, J.; Li, B.; Chen, R.; Luo, K.; Xiang, X.; Lu, S.; Huang, C.; Liu, L.; Tang, J.; et al. Drug-induced oxidative stress in cancer treatments: Angel or devil? Redox Biol. 2023, 63, 102754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Kuperus, M.; Dowdeswell, M.; Potier, N.; Donald, L.J.; Kunkel, M.; Berggren, M.; Angulo, M.; Powis, G. Mechanisms of inhibition of the thioredoxin growth factor system by antitumor 2-imidazolyl disulfides. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1998, 55, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Mohammadi, F.; Soltani, A.; Ghahremanloo, A.; Javid, H.; Hashemy, S.I. The thioredoxin system and cancer therapy: A review. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2019, 84, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tan, Y.; Bi, L.; Zhang, P.; Wang, F.; Lin, F.; Ni, W.; Wu, J.; Jiang, L. Thioredoxin-1 inhibitor PX-12 induces human acute myeloid leukemia cell apoptosis and enhances the sensitivity of cells to arsenic trioxide. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 4765–4773. [Google Scholar]
  130. Ehrenfeld, V.; Fulda, S. Thioredoxin inhibitor PX-12 induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Biol. Chem. 2020, 401, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kinoshita, H.; Shimozato, O.; Ishii, T.; Kamoda, H.; Hagiwara, Y.; Ohtori, S.; Yonemoto, T. The Thioredoxin-1 Inhibitor, PX-12, Suppresses Local Osteosarcoma Progression. Anticancer Res. 2021, 41, 6013–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ramanathan, R.K.; Stephenson, J.J.; Weiss, G.J.; Pestano, L.A.; Lowe, A.; Hiscox, A.; Leos, R.A.; Martin, J.C.; Kirkpatrick, L.; Richards, D.A. A phase I trial of PX-12, a small-molecule inhibitor of thioredoxin-1, administered as a 72-hour infusion every 21 days in patients with advanced cancers refractory to standard therapy. Investig. New Drugs 2012, 30, 1591–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Ramanathan, R.K.; Abbruzzese, J.; Dragovich, T.; Kirkpatrick, L.; Guillen, J.M.; Baker, A.F.; Pestano, L.A.; Green, S.; von Hoff, D.D. A randomized phase II study of PX-12, an inhibitor of thioredoxin in patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas following progression after a gemcitabine-containing combination. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2011, 67, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nicolay, J.P.; Müller-Decker, K.; Schroeder, A.; Brechmann, M.; Möbs, M.; Géraud, C.; Assaf, C.; Goerdt, S.; Krammer, P.H.; Gülow, K. Dimethyl fumarate restores apoptosis sensitivity and inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in CTCL by targeting NF-κB. Blood 2016, 128, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Nicolay, J.P.; Melchers, S.; Albrecht, J.D.; Assaf, C.; Dippel, E.; Stadler, R.; Wehkamp, U.; Wobser, M.; Zhao, J.; Burghaus, I.; et al. Dimethyl fumarate treatment in relapsed and refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter phase 2 study. Blood 2023, 142, 794–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Froehlich, T.C.; Müller-Decker, K.; Braun, J.D.; Albrecht, T.; Schroeder, A.; Gülow, K.; Goerdt, S.; Krammer, P.H.; Nicolay, J.P. Combined inhibition of Bcl-2 and NFκB synergistically induces cell death in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2019, 134, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wells, G.; Berry, J.M.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Burger, A.M.; Seaton, A.; Wang, B.; Westwell, A.D.; Stevens, M.F.G. 4-Substituted 4-hydroxycyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ones with selective activities against colon and renal cancer cell lines. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bradshaw, T.D.; Matthews, C.S.; Cookson, J.; Chew, E.-H.; Shah, M.; Bailey, K.; Monks, A.; Harris, E.; Westwell, A.D.; Wells, G.; et al. Elucidation of thioredoxin as a molecular target for antitumor quinols. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3911–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Mukherjee, A.; Martin, S.G. The thioredoxin system: A key target in tumour and endothelial cells. Br. J. Radiol. 2008, 81, S57–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mukherjee, A.; Huber, K.; Evans, H.; Lakhani, N.; Martin, S. A cellular and molecular investigation of the action of PMX464, a putative thioredoxin inhibitor, in normal and colorectal cancer cell lines. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 151, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mukherjee, A.; Westwell, A.D.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Stevens, M.F.G.; Carmichael, J.; Martin, S.G. Cytotoxic and antiangiogenic activity of AW464 (NSC 706704), a novel thioredoxin inhibitor: An in vitro study. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Thiagalingam, S.; Cheng, K.-H.; Lee, H.J.; Mineva, N.; Thiagalingam, A.; Ponte, J.F. Histone deacetylases: Unique players in shaping the epigenetic histone code. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 983, 84–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Seidel, C.; Florean, C.; Schnekenburger, M.; Dicato, M.; Diederich, M. Chromatin-modifying agents in anti-cancer therapy. Biochimie 2012, 94, 2264–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Dokmanovic, M.; Clarke, C.; Marks, P.A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Overview and perspectives. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Richon, V.M.; Emiliani, S.; Verdin, E.; Webb, Y.; Breslow, R.; Rifkind, R.A.; Marks, P.A. A class of hybrid polar inducers of transformed cell differentiation inhibits histone deacetylases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3003–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Butler, L.M.; Zhou, X.; Xu, W.-S.; Scher, H.I.; Rifkind, R.A.; Marks, P.A.; Richon, V.M. The histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA arrests cancer cell growth, up-regulates thioredoxin-binding protein-2, and down-regulates thioredoxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11700–11705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Marks, P.A. Thioredoxin in cancer--role of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wang, W.; Fang, D.; Zhang, H.; Xue, J.; Wangchuk, D.; Du, J.; Jiang, L. Sodium Butyrate Selectively Kills Cancer Cells and Inhibits Migration in Colorectal Cancer by Targeting Thioredoxin-1. OncoTargets Ther. 2020, 13, 4691–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Jin, X.; Wu, N.; Dai, J.; Li, Q.; Xiao, X. TXNIP mediates the differential responses of A549 cells to sodium butyrate and sodium 4-phenylbutyrate treatment. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 424–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Sun, Q.A.; Wu, Y.; Zappacosta, F.; Jeang, K.T.; Lee, B.J.; Hatfield, D.L.; Gladyshev, V.N. Redox regulation of cell signaling by selenocysteine in mammalian thioredoxin reductases. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 24522–24530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, Z.; Tao, L.; Sheng, X.; Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Ruan, J.; Liu, Z.; Cao, Y.; et al. Targeting Thioredoxin System with an Organosulfur Compound, Diallyl Trisulfide (DATS), Attenuates Progression and Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 1945–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Tian, Y.; Ge, Z.; Xu, M.; Ge, X.; Zhao, M.; Ding, F.; Yin, J.; Wang, X.; You, Y.; Shi, Z.; et al. Diallyl trisulfide sensitizes radiation therapy on glioblastoma through directly targeting thioredoxin 1. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 189, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ogata, F.T.; Branco, V.; Vale, F.F.; Coppo, L. Glutaredoxin: Discovery, redox defense and much more. Redox Biol. 2021, 43, 101975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Haffo, L.; Lu, J.; Bykov, V.J.N.; Martin, S.S.; Ren, X.; Coppo, L.; Wiman, K.G.; Holmgren, A. Inhibition of the glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems and ribonucleotide reductase by mutant p53-targeting compound APR-246. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Srinivasan, U.; Bala, A.; Jao, S.; Starke, D.W.; Jordan, T.W.; Mieyal, J.J. Selective inactivation of glutaredoxin by sporidesmin and other epidithiopiperazinediones. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 8978–8987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Gorelenkova Miller, O.; Cole, K.S.; Emerson, C.C.; Allimuthu, D.; Golczak, M.; Stewart, P.L.; Weerapana, E.; Adams, D.J.; Mieyal, J.J. Novel chloroacetamido compound CWR-J02 is an anti-inflammatory glutaredoxin-1 inhibitor. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Wang, L.; Yang, Z.; Fu, J.; Yin, H.; Xiong, K.; Tan, Q.; Jin, H.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Tang, W.; et al. Ethaselen: A potent mammalian thioredoxin reductase 1 inhibitor and novel organoselenium anticancer agent. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Zheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Bai, M.; Liu, Y.; Xu, B.; Sun, R.; Zeng, H. The antimetastatic effect and underlying mechanisms of thioredoxin reductase inhibitor ethaselen. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 131, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Ortego, L.; Cardoso, F.; Martins, S.; Fillat, M.F.; Laguna, A.; Meireles, M.; Villacampa, M.D.; Gimeno, M.C. Strong inhibition of thioredoxin reductase by highly cytotoxic gold(I) complexes. DNA binding studies. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014, 130, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Gandin, V.; Fernandes, A.P.; Rigobello, M.P.; Dani, B.; Sorrentino, F.; Tisato, F.; Björnstedt, M.; Bindoli, A.; Sturaro, A.; Rella, R.; et al. Cancer cell death induced by phosphine gold(I) compounds targeting thioredoxin reductase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 79, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Scalcon, V.; Bindoli, A.; Rigobello, M.P. Significance of the mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in cancer cells: An update on role, targets and inhibitors. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 127, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Witte, A.-B.; Anestål, K.; Jerremalm, E.; Ehrsson, H.; Arnér, E.S.J. Inhibition of thioredoxin reductase but not of glutathione reductase by the major classes of alkylating and platinum-containing anticancer compounds. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005, 39, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, H.; Bouzakoura, S.; de Mey, S.; Jiang, H.; Law, K.; Dufait, I.; Corbet, C.; Verovski, V.; Gevaert, T.; Feron, O.; et al. Auranofin radiosensitizes tumor cells through targeting thioredoxin reductase and resulting overproduction of reactive oxygen species. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 35728–35742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Han, Y.; Chen, P.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, W.; Ding, W.; Luo, Y.; Wen, S.; Xu, R.; Liu, P.; Huang, P. Synergy between Auranofin and Celecoxib against Colon Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo through a Novel Redox-Mediated Mechanism. Cancers 2019, 11, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zhang, M.; Yang, D.-Y.; He, Z.-Y.; Wu, Y.; Tian, X.-Y.; Huang, Q.-Y.; Ma, W.-B.; Deng, M.; Wang, Q.-Z.; Yan, S.-J.; et al. Auranofin inhibits the occurrence of colorectal cancer by promoting mTOR-dependent autophagy and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Anticancer Drugs 2024, 35, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Nag, D.; Bhanja, P.; Riha, R.; Sanchez-Guerrero, G.; Kimler, B.F.; Tsue, T.T.; Lominska, C.; Saha, S. Auranofin Protects Intestine against Radiation Injury by Modulating p53/p21 Pathway and Radiosensitizes Human Colon Tumor. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 4791–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Hou, G.-X.; Liu, P.-P.; Zhang, S.; Yang, M.; Liao, J.; Yang, J.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, W.-Q.; Wen, S.; Huang, P. Elimination of stem-like cancer cell side-population by auranofin through modulation of ROS and glycolysis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Graczyk-Jarzynka, A.; Goral, A.; Muchowicz, A.; Zagozdzon, R.; Winiarska, M.; Bajor, M.; Trzeciecka, A.; Fidyt, K.; Krupka, J.A.; Cyran, J.; et al. Inhibition of thioredoxin-dependent H2O2 removal sensitizes malignant B-cells to pharmacological ascorbate. Redox Biol. 2019, 21, 101062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yang, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Wu, Q.; An, P.; Jin, X.; Liu, W.; Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Yan, S.; et al. Auranofin mitigates systemic iron overload and induces ferroptosis via distinct mechanisms. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Rigobello, M.P.; Gandin, V.; Folda, A.; Rundlöf, A.-K.; Fernandes, A.P.; Bindoli, A.; Marzano, C.; Björnstedt, M. Treatment of human cancer cells with selenite or tellurite in combination with auranofin enhances cell death due to redox shift. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Lee, J.-E.; Kwon, Y.-J.; Baek, H.-S.; Ye, D.-J.; Cho, E.; Choi, H.-K.; Oh, K.-S.; Chun, Y.-J. Synergistic induction of apoptosis by combination treatment with mesupron and auranofin in human breast cancer cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2017, 40, 746–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Karaca, Ö.; Scalcon, V.; Meier-Menches, S.M.; Bonsignore, R.; Brouwer, J.M.J.L.; Tonolo, F.; Folda, A.; Rigobello, M.P.; Kühn, F.E.; Casini, A. Characterization of Hydrophilic Gold(I) N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Complexes as Potent TrxR Inhibitors Using Biochemical and Mass Spectrometric Approaches. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 14237–14250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Zhao, Q.; Han, B.; Peng, C.; Zhang, N.; Huang, W.; He, G.; Li, J.-L. A promising future of metal-N-heterocyclic carbene complexes in medicinal chemistry: The emerging bioorganometallic antitumor agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2024, 44, 2194–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Schmidt, C.; Albrecht, L.; Balasupramaniam, S.; Misgeld, R.; Karge, B.; Brönstrup, M.; Prokop, A.; Baumann, K.; Reichl, S.; Ott, I. A gold(i) biscarbene complex with improved activity as a TrxR inhibitor and cytotoxic drug: Comparative studies with different gold metallodrugs. Metallomics 2019, 11, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Schmidt, C.; Karge, B.; Misgeld, R.; Prokop, A.; Franke, R.; Brönstrup, M.; Ott, I. Gold(I) NHC Complexes: Antiproliferative Activity, Cellular Uptake, Inhibition of Mammalian and Bacterial Thioredoxin Reductases, and Gram-Positive Directed Antibacterial Effects. Chemistry 2017, 23, 1869–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chbib, C. Synthesis of isomeric analogues of S-ribosylhomocysteine analogues with homocysteine unit attached to C2 of ribose. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 1681–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Jana, S.; Ganeshpurkar, A.; Singh, S.K. Multiple 3D-QSAR modeling, e-pharmacophore, molecular docking, and in vitro study to explore novel AChE inhibitors. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 39477–39495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Singh, D.V.; Misra, K. Curcuminoids as inhibitors of thioredoxin reductase: A receptor based pharmacophore study with distance mapping of the active site. Bioinformation 2009, 4, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Moos, P.J.; Edes, K.; Mullally, J.E.; Fitzpatrick, F.A. Curcumin impairs tumor suppressor p53 function in colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 1611–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zhang, T.; Zheng, P.; Shen, X.; Shao, R.; Wang, B.; Shen, H.; Zhang, J.; Xia, Y.; Zou, P. Curcuminoid WZ26, a TrxR1 inhibitor, effectively inhibits colon cancer cell growth and enhances cisplatin-induced cell death through the induction of ROS. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 141, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Chung, H.; Yoon, S.H.; Cho, J.-Y.; Yeo, H.K.; Shin, D.; Park, J.-Y. Comparative pharmacokinetics of Theracurmin, a highly bioavailable curcumin, in healthy adult subjects. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 59, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Jeon, Y.; Sym, S.J.; Yoo, B.K.; Baek, J.-H. Long-term Survival, Tolerability, and Safety of First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI in Combination With Ginsenoside-Modified Nanostructured Lipid Carrier Containing Curcumin in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2022, 21, 15347354221105498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Howells, L.M.; Iwuji, C.O.O.; Irving, G.R.B.; Barber, S.; Walter, H.; Sidat, Z.; Griffin-Teall, N.; Singh, R.; Foreman, N.; Patel, S.R.; et al. Curcumin Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Randomized Phase IIa Trial. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Wang, H.; Jiang, H.; Corbet, C.; de Mey, S.; Law, K.; Gevaert, T.; Feron, O.; de Ridder, M. Piperlongumine increases sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to radiation: Involvement of ROS production via dual inhibition of glutathione and thioredoxin systems. Cancer Lett. 2019, 450, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Yang, Y.; Sun, S.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, R.; Ma, K.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J. Piperlongumine Inhibits Thioredoxin Reductase 1 by Targeting Selenocysteine Residues and Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Erastin. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Chen, W.; Lian, W.; Yuan, Y.; Li, M. The synergistic effects of oxaliplatin and piperlongumine on colorectal cancer are mediated by oxidative stress. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Mehmood, T.; Muanprasat, C. Deoxyelephantopin and Its Isomer Isodeoxyelephantopin: Anti-Cancer Natural Products with Multiple Modes of Action. Molecules 2022, 27, 2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Hong, L.; Chen, J.; Wu, F.; Wu, F.; Shen, X.; Zheng, P.; Shao, R.; Lu, K.; Liu, Z.; Chen, D.; et al. Isodeoxyelephantopin Inactivates Thioredoxin Reductase 1 and Activates ROS-Mediated JNK Signaling Pathway to Exacerbate Cisplatin Effectiveness in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 580517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 13 01078 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the thioredoxin (Trx) redox system. (A) Reduced Trx catalyzes the reduction of disulfide bonds (S-S) in oxidized proteins. In this process, Trx is oxidized and subsequently reduced by thioredoxin reductase (TrxR). (B) Peroxiredoxin (Prx) converts H2O2 directly into water, becoming oxidized at a cysteine residue. The reduced Redox state of Prx is restored by reduction by Trx. red = reduced; ox = oxidized. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the thioredoxin (Trx) redox system. (A) Reduced Trx catalyzes the reduction of disulfide bonds (S-S) in oxidized proteins. In this process, Trx is oxidized and subsequently reduced by thioredoxin reductase (TrxR). (B) Peroxiredoxin (Prx) converts H2O2 directly into water, becoming oxidized at a cysteine residue. The reduced Redox state of Prx is restored by reduction by Trx. red = reduced; ox = oxidized. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g001
Antioxidants 13 01078 g002
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the reaction catalyzed by the thioredoxin reductase homodimer. Reduction equivalents from NADPH are transferred to the flavin cofactor, then to the disulfide Cys135-Cys138 of thioredoxin reductase TrxR, and finally to the disulfide Cys32-Cys35 of thioredoxin (Trx). The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the reaction catalyzed by the thioredoxin reductase homodimer. Reduction equivalents from NADPH are transferred to the flavin cofactor, then to the disulfide Cys135-Cys138 of thioredoxin reductase TrxR, and finally to the disulfide Cys32-Cys35 of thioredoxin (Trx). The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g002
Antioxidants 13 01078 g003
Figure 3. Phosphorylation of the inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) by the IκB kinase (IKK) complex leads to its degradation. Oxidation of IκB can further enhance this process, resulting in the release of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). A pro-oxidative environment and oxidation of NF-κB promote its translocation to the nucleus. In the nucleus, NF-κB is reduced by thioredoxin 1 (Trx1) to ensure optimal DNA binding. P = phosphorylation; ox = oxidation. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Figure 3. Phosphorylation of the inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) by the IκB kinase (IKK) complex leads to its degradation. Oxidation of IκB can further enhance this process, resulting in the release of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). A pro-oxidative environment and oxidation of NF-κB promote its translocation to the nucleus. In the nucleus, NF-κB is reduced by thioredoxin 1 (Trx1) to ensure optimal DNA binding. P = phosphorylation; ox = oxidation. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g003
Antioxidants 13 01078 g004
Figure 4. The thioredoxin (Trx) system modulates various signaling pathways in response to hypoxia and oxidative stress, leading to the inhibition of apoptosis and the induction of the anti-antioxidant defense. Additionally, it promotes angiogenesis, cell migration, and invasiveness, which can support tumor proliferation and metastasis. Trx1red = reduced thioredoxin; Trxox = oxidized thioredoxin. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Figure 4. The thioredoxin (Trx) system modulates various signaling pathways in response to hypoxia and oxidative stress, leading to the inhibition of apoptosis and the induction of the anti-antioxidant defense. Additionally, it promotes angiogenesis, cell migration, and invasiveness, which can support tumor proliferation and metastasis. Trx1red = reduced thioredoxin; Trxox = oxidized thioredoxin. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g004
Antioxidants 13 01078 g005
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the mechanism of action of PX-12 and dimethyl fumarate (DMF). (A) PX-12 inhibits thioredoxin 1 (Trx1). This leads to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which oxidizes macromolecules such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. These oxidative damages (particularly the accumulation of DNA damage) induce the intrinsic apoptosis cascade. The pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members BAX (Bcl-2-associated X protein) and BAK (Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer) oligomerize and form a pore in the outer mitochondrial membrane, leading to a collapse of the membrane potential and the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C). This release of Cyt C induces the formation of the death platform called the apoptosome and the induction of cell death. (B) DMF also inhibits Trx1. As a result, the redox-sensitive transcription factor NF-κB can no longer be reduced in the nucleus. NF-κB can then no longer effectively bind to its binding sites in the promoter regions of its target genes. This leads to a decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins cFLIP (FLICE-like inhibitory protein) and the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins IAP1, IAP2, and XIAP. The absence of IAPs allows the formation of the death platform called the ripoptosome. This can induce both apoptosis and necroptosis through the receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinases RIP1 and RIP3, if the apoptosis pathway is blocked. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the mechanism of action of PX-12 and dimethyl fumarate (DMF). (A) PX-12 inhibits thioredoxin 1 (Trx1). This leads to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which oxidizes macromolecules such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. These oxidative damages (particularly the accumulation of DNA damage) induce the intrinsic apoptosis cascade. The pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members BAX (Bcl-2-associated X protein) and BAK (Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer) oligomerize and form a pore in the outer mitochondrial membrane, leading to a collapse of the membrane potential and the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C). This release of Cyt C induces the formation of the death platform called the apoptosome and the induction of cell death. (B) DMF also inhibits Trx1. As a result, the redox-sensitive transcription factor NF-κB can no longer be reduced in the nucleus. NF-κB can then no longer effectively bind to its binding sites in the promoter regions of its target genes. This leads to a decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins cFLIP (FLICE-like inhibitory protein) and the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins IAP1, IAP2, and XIAP. The absence of IAPs allows the formation of the death platform called the ripoptosome. This can induce both apoptosis and necroptosis through the receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinases RIP1 and RIP3, if the apoptosis pathway is blocked. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g005
Antioxidants 13 01078 g006
Figure 6. Auranofin inhibits thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1), leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. Elevated ROS levels cause the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), triggering ER stress and the induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which can induce cell death. ROS also causes DNA damage, activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. This results in mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C) from the mitochondrial intermembrane space through a pore formed by the Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) and the Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK), subsequently leading to the formation of the apoptosome and the induction of apoptosis. Auranofin further exacerbates this by inhibiting mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase 2 TrxR2, causing mitochondrial damage, including to the electron transport chain, which increases ROS production and oxidative damage.
Figure 6. Auranofin inhibits thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1), leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. Elevated ROS levels cause the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), triggering ER stress and the induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which can induce cell death. ROS also causes DNA damage, activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. This results in mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C) from the mitochondrial intermembrane space through a pore formed by the Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) and the Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK), subsequently leading to the formation of the apoptosome and the induction of apoptosis. Auranofin further exacerbates this by inhibiting mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase 2 TrxR2, causing mitochondrial damage, including to the electron transport chain, which increases ROS production and oxidative damage.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g006
Antioxidants 13 01078 g007
Figure 7. The thioredoxin (Trx) system regulates a plethora of signaling pathways. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Figure 7. The thioredoxin (Trx) system regulates a plethora of signaling pathways. The figure was created with the assistance of BioRender.com.
Antioxidants 13 01078 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seitz, R.; Tümen, D.; Kunst, C.; Heumann, P.; Schmid, S.; Kandulski, A.; Müller, M.; Gülow, K. Exploring the Thioredoxin System as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer: Mechanisms and Implications. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091078

AMA Style

Seitz R, Tümen D, Kunst C, Heumann P, Schmid S, Kandulski A, Müller M, Gülow K. Exploring the Thioredoxin System as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer: Mechanisms and Implications. Antioxidants. 2024; 13(9):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seitz, Rebecca, Deniz Tümen, Claudia Kunst, Phillip Heumann, Stephan Schmid, Arne Kandulski, Martina Müller, and Karsten Gülow. 2024. "Exploring the Thioredoxin System as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer: Mechanisms and Implications" Antioxidants 13, no. 9: 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop