Vassilis Valatas
Kazuya Kitamura
Stephen G. Ward
George Kolios- 1Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
- 2Department of Gastroenterology, Tonami General Hospital, Tonami, Japan
- 3Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- 4Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
Editorial on the Research Topic
Stromal and immune cell interactions in intestinal inflammation and fibrosis
During the last decade accumulating data demonstrated that intestinal stromal cells are not just a supporting structure that responds homogenously to immune stimuli. Rather they represent a complex organization of mesenchymal cells, an organ within the intestine, with discrete roles for every one of its members, orchestrating complex tasks. Unfortunately, full characterization of stromal cell subsets and comprehension of their discrete functions has been hampered by the absence of a standardized nomenclature. This is mostly attributed to species differences and the variable experimental approaches used for characterization as murine mechanistic studies are based on surface markers of isolated cells, whereas human descriptive studies are based mostly on single cell transcriptomics.
In the current topic, Chalkidi et al. and Sun et al. align together many pieces of the puzzle in two comprehensive reviews that examine murine and human intestinal mesenchymal subsets in parallel and summarize their molecular phenotypes and functions during intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. CD81+ fibroblasts, (also called trophocytes) in the small intestine, type III stromal cell in the human colon or crypt bottom fibroblasts, are located below crypts. They are analogous to human WNT2B+ cells and their main function is to maintain intestinal stem cell identity and proliferation via antagonizing BMP signal while promoting the Wnt signal by expressing Grem1, Wnt2, Wnt2b, Wnt5a,Rspo1 and Rspo3 (1, 2). PDGFRαhi fibroblasts, also called PdgfrahiFoxl1+ murine telocytes or CD142+ human telocyte-like cells, are equivalent to human PDGFRA+, WNT5B+, S2 subsets. They contain two distinct subsets that are located at the top and bottom of villi and crypts, and regulate epithelial cell differentiation, proliferation, and maturation via enhanced expression of Wnt and BMP ligands (1, 3). PDGFRαloCD81- murine intestinal fibroblasts or stromal 1 cells in humans, are located in the lamina propria, around crypts and inside the villous core. Analogous to human WNT2B+FOS+ lamina propria fibroblasts, they secrete basement membrane proteins and contribute to extracellular matrix (ECM) production, remodeling and intestinal stem cell niche formation (1), as well as maintenance of lacteal integrity (4).
These distinct intestinal mesenchymal stromal cells and their subclasses seem to organize sub-epithelial immune regulatory centres that can interact with different types of immune cells as reviewed by Sun et al. In brief, stromal cells support innate defenses through the production of cytokines such as IL-6, and chemokines that recruit neutrophils (IL-8), monocytes (CCL-2) and T cells (CCL-5) to promote bacterial clearance (5). Organized in discrete immune hubs at the villus tip and the crypt bottom, stromal cells enhance innate immune responses or regulate autoimmunity respectively. This is mediated through co-operation with specific innate lymphoid cell populations and various immunoregulatory mechanisms that include expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 immune checkpoint inhibitors (Beswick et al.), regulation of retinoid acid in tolerogenic dendritic cells (6) and expansion of regulatory FOXP3pos T cells (7).
During inflammation, stromal cells both produce and respond to cytokines and chemokines through a variety of cytokine receptors that can be up-regulated by inflammatory stimuli (8, 9). In response to the inflammatory milieu of human Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) or murine experimental IBD, stromal cells broaden their chemokine production (10–12) and have been implicated in treatment-resistant disease in IBD patients that overproduce Oncostatin M or IL-1β (13). Furthermore, they produce factors involved in fibrosis like IL-11, which is also part of the IL-6 family, and TNFSF15 (14; West). IBD is also associated with expansion of fibroblast clusters with high expression of PDPN or FAP and up-regulation of inflammation associated genes such as CCL-19, IL-33, TNFSF14, IL-1R1, TNFSF11, and IL-13RA2 (10, 12) in parallel with diminished capacity of intestinal fibroblasts to induce IL-10-producing regulatory T cells (7). The differential expression of PD-L1 in the two main clinical entities of IBD on intestinal stromal cells; i.e. Crohn’s disease (CD), and Ulcerative colitis (UC) with a decreased PD-L1 expression in patients with UC, but an increased PD-L1 expression in CD patients may indicate an involvement in the observed distinct immunopathological changes characteristically seen in these two entities (Beswick et al.).
In the current topic, Monteleone et al., summarize data on production of IL-34 and M-CSF-1 by intestinal stromal cells that regulates resident macrophages to promote gut homeostasis. In the context of intestinal inflammation, blockage of M-CSF1 or IL-34 or loss of M-CSF-1R protects mice in many experimental colitis settings. A parallel pro-fibrotic role of IL-34 in human CD is demonstrated by its higher expression in fibrostenotic samples and its ability to up-regulate ECM production by human intestinal stromal cells. This underscores the presence of CD34-driven inflammatory and fibrotic amplification loops in the intestinal mucosa that may represent a new therapeutic anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic target in IBD.
Intestinal stromal cell derived ECM has been shown to participate in engagement of immune cells during inflammation, in profibrotic cascades or in proper wound healing after inflammation has subsided (15). However, Seltana et al. report that fibrinogen produced by a subset of intestinal epithelial cells has a primary role in proper wound healing. They show that epithelial derived fibrinogen is deposited at the basement membrane as fibrin where it serves as a substrate for wound healing under physiological conditions. During inflammation, inhibition of fibrin formation exacerbates experimental dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) colitis indicating that epithelial-derived fibrin is important for preventing epithelial damage or promoting epithelial repair. This highlights important interactions between stromal and epithelial cells during the intestinal wound healing responses.
Previous studies have shown that glycolysis is the preferred energy source for fibroblasts in fibrosis, while inhibition of glycolysis decreases fibrosis by reducing ECM (16, 17). The metabolic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) is a key kinase regulating glycolytic activity and it is implicated in inflammation and various immune-related disorders (18). In the current issue, Zhou et al., present data for the role of PFKFB3 in patients with IBD. Using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis, they found that glycolysis is significantly higher in human intestinal samples from IBD patients compared to healthy controls, while single-cell sequencing data showed that PFKFB3 expression is higher in gut biopsies from IBD patients. Furthermore, PFKFB3 expressed in the stromal cells of the intestinal samples is upregulated following stimulation with proinflammatory cytokines in in vitro models. In addition, inhibition of PFKFB3 by the specific inhibitor PFK15 results in reversion of the increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in fibroblasts and reduction of the severity of DSS and T cell transfer induced colitis. This study demonstrates for first time that increased PFKFB3 expression in stromal cells contributes to inflammation and fibrosis in IBD and suggests that inhibition of PFKFB3 might be a new therapeutic strategy in intestinal inflammation and fibrosis.
In the context of recurrent autoinflammatory intestinal disorders as in IBD, post-inflammatory intestinal fibrosis may occur that alters mesenchymal cell biologic behavior. Intestinal fibroblasts reduce migration, and increase proliferation and collagen production, in parallel clusters that regulate epithelial cell proliferation are diminished (12, 19–22). In this issue, Dovrolis et al. approach fibrosis as a universal link in disease. By identifying common fibrotic transcriptomic signatures, in otherwise uncorrelated disorders, and their site-specific co-expression, they proceed to apply this knowledge on the issue of ileal fibrosis during IBD. Their methodology provides the basis for a practice that can be applied similarly to other shared molecular mechanisms. Meanwhile, their findings illuminate the molecular background of a serious complication in IBD, opening the way for future treatment-focused mechanistic studies or applications in other fibrotic disorders.
Finally, in the current Research Topic, Chen et al., giving attention to a new research field, have deeply examined the expression of cuproptosis-related regulators and their implication in the pathogenetic mechanisms of IBD. Recently, a copper-dependent pathway that differs from all other known pathways that underlie cell death, called cuproptosis, has been described. Cuproptosis occurs via copper binding to lipoylated enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, which leads to proteotoxic stress and cell death, and it has been reported to be involved in various disorders. In the present study, Chen et al. apply bioinformatic strategies to examine for first time, the implication of cuproptosis in IBD. They examine the association between immune score and cuproptosis-related genes, and they present a comprehensive landscape of their importance in IBD. This study therefore identifies cuproptosis as playing a key role in the pathogenesis of IBD with its ability to change chronic death of the intestinal epithelial cells that might be involved in both disease risk and treatment.
Collectively, these publications in the current Research Topic highlight the role of stromal cells in the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation and fibrosis. They have focused on a wide range of characteristics of these cells, from their involvement in inflammatory mechanisms and their crosstalk with immune cells and epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosa, through soluble mediators, to their pivotal role in the fibrotic process of IBD. Furthermore, the Research Topic examines the heterogeneity of stromal cell subtypes and their contribution to epithelial repair and immune homeostasis in gut mucosa, giving these cells a primary role in mucosal immunology.
Author contributions
VV, KK, SW and GK edited the Research Topic and wrote this editorial. All authors approved the submitted version of this editorial.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Buechler MB, Pradhan RN, Krishnamurty AT, Cox C, Calviello AK, Wang AW, et al. Cross-tissue organization of the fibroblast lineage. Nature (2021) 593(7860):575–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03549-5
2. Wu N, Sun H, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Tan J, Qi Y, et al. Map3k2-regulated intestinal stromal cells define a distinct stem cell niche. Nature (2021) 592(7855):606–10. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03283-y
3. Bahar Halpern K, Massalha H, Zwick RK, Moor AE, Castillo-Azofeifa D, Rozenberg M, et al. Lgr5+ telocytes are a signaling source at the intestinal villus tip. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):1936. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15714-x
4. Hong SP, Yang MJ, Cho H, Park I, Bae H, Choe K, et al. Distinct fibroblast subsets regulate lacteal integrity through Yap/Taz-induced vegf-c in intestinal villi. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):4102. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17886-y
5. Kim YG, Kamada N, Shaw MH, Warner N, Chen GY, Franchi L, et al. The Nod2 sensor promotes intestinal pathogen eradication Via the chemokine Ccl2-dependent recruitment of inflammatory monocytes. Immunity (2011) 34(5):769–80. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.013
6. Vicente-Suarez I, Larange A, Reardon C, Matho M, Feau S, Chodaczek G, et al. Unique lamina propria stromal cells imprint the functional phenotype of mucosal dendritic cells. Mucosal Immunol (2015) 8(1):141–51. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.51
7. Pinchuk IV, Beswick EJ, Saada JI, Boya G, Schmitt D, Raju GS, et al. Human colonic myofibroblasts promote expansion of Cd4+ Cd25high Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Gastroenterology (2011) 140(7):2019–30. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.059
8. Filidou E, Valatas V, Drygiannakis I, Arvanitidis K, Vradelis S, Kouklakis G, et al. Cytokine receptor profiling in human colonic subepithelial myofibroblasts: A differential effect of Th polarization-associated cytokines in intestinal fibrosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2018) 24(10):2224–41. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy204
9. Kouroumalis A, Nibbs RJ, Aptel H, Wright KL, Kolios G, Ward SG. The chemokines Cxcl9, Cxcl10, and Cxcl11 differentially stimulate G alpha I-independent signaling and actin responses in human intestinal myofibroblasts. J Immunol (2005) 175(8):5403–11. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.5403
10. Smillie CS, Biton M, Ordovas-Montanes J, Sullivan KM, Burgin G, Graham DB, et al. Intra- and inter-cellular rewiring of the human colon during ulcerative colitis. Cell (2019) 178(3):714–30.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.029
11. Martin JC, Chang C, Boschetti G, Ungaro R, Giri M, Grout JA, et al. Single-cell analysis of crohn's disease lesions identifies a pathogenic cellular module associated with resistance to anti-tnf therapy. Cell (2019) 178(6):1493–508.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.008
12. Kinchen J, Chen HH, Parikh K, Antanaviciute A, Jagielowicz M, Fawkner-Corbett D, et al. Structural remodeling of the human colonic mesenchyme in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell (2018) 175(2):372–86.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.067
13. West NR, Hegazy AN, Owens BMJ, Bullers SJ, Linggi B, Buonocore S, et al. Oncostatin m drives intestinal inflammation and predicts response to tumor necrosis factor-neutralizing therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Med (2017) 23(5):579–89. doi: 10.1038/nm.4307
14. Bamias G, Filidou E, Goukos D, Valatas V, Arvanitidis K, Panagopoulou M, et al. Crohn's disease-associated mucosal factors regulate the expression of tnf-like cytokine 1a and its receptors in primary subepithelial intestinal myofibroblasts and intestinal epithelial cells. Transl Res (2017) 180:118–30.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.08.007
15. Valatas V, Filidou E, Drygiannakis I, Kolios G. Stromal and immune cells in gut fibrosis: The myofibroblast and the scarface. Ann Gastroenterol (2017) 30(4):393–404. doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0146
16. Yin XN, Wang J, Cui LF, Fan WX. Enhanced glycolysis in the process of renal fibrosis aggravated the development of chronic kidney disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2018) 22(13):4243–51. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15419
17. Rabinowitz JD, Mutlu GM. A metabolic strategy to reverse fibrosis? Nat Metab (2019) 1(1):12–3. doi: 10.1038/s42255-018-0013-8
18. Bartrons R, Rodríguez-García A, Simon-Molas H, Castaño E, Manzano A, Navarro-Sabaté À. The potential utility of Pfkfb3 as a therapeutic target. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2018) 22(8):659–74. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2018.1498082
19. Leeb SN, Vogl D, Gunckel M, Kiessling S, Falk W, Göke M, et al. Reduced migration of fibroblasts in inflammatory bowel disease: Role of inflammatory mediators and focal adhesion kinase. Gastroenterology (2003) 125(5):1341–54. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.004
20. Meier JK, Scharl M, Miller SN, Brenmoehl J, Hausmann M, Kellermeier S, et al. Specific differences in migratory function of myofibroblasts isolated from crohn's disease fistulae and strictures. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2011) 17(1):202–12. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21344
21. Drygiannakis I, Valatas V, Sfakianaki O, Bourikas L, Manousou P, Kambas K, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines induce crosstalk between colonic epithelial cells and subepithelial myofibroblasts: Implication in intestinal fibrosis. J Crohns Colitis (2013) 7(4):286–300. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.04.008
Keywords: intestinal stromal cells, mesenchymal cells, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), IL-34, extracellular matrice (ECM), glycolysis (glycolytic pathway), intestinal fibrosis, cuproptosis
Citation: Valatas V, Kitamura K, Ward SG and Kolios G (2023) Editorial: Stromal and immune cell interactions in intestinal inflammation and fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 14:1152140. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1152140
Received: 27 January 2023; Accepted: 09 February 2023;
Published: 16 February 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Christoph Mueller, University of Bern, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2023 Valatas, Kitamura, Ward and Kolios. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Vassilis Valatas, [email protected]