References
[1] Taguchi G: Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes. Asian Productivity Or-ganization, Tokyo, 1986, p. 191.
[2] Box GEP. Discussion of off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. J Qual Technol 1985; 17: 198-206.
[3] Vining GG and Myers RH. Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. J Qual Technol 1990; 22(1): 38-45.
[4] Box GEP and Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc 1951; 13: 1-45.
[5] Del Castillo E and Montgomery DC. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. J Qual Technol 1993; 25: 199-204.
[6] Lin DKJ and Tu W. Dual response surface. J Qual Technol 1995; 27(1): 34-39.
[7] Copeland KA and Nelson PR. Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. J Qual Technol 1996; 28(1): 331-336.
[8] Köksoy O and Doganaksoy N. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation in response surface experimentation. J Qual Technol 2003; 35(3): 239-252.
[9] Shoemaker AC and Tsui KL and Wu CFJ. Economical experimentation methods for robust parameter design. Technometrics 1991; 33: 415-427.
[10] Lucas JM. How to achieve a robust process using response surface methodology. J Qual Technol 1994; 26(4): 248-260.
[11] Kim K and Lin DKJ. Dual response optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. J Qual Technol 1998; 30(1): 1-10.
[12] Fan SKS. A generalized global optimization algorithm for dual response systems. J Qual Technol 2000; 32(4): 444-456.
[13] Köksoy O. Multiresponse robust design: Mean square error (MSE) criterion. Appl Math Comput 2005; 175(2): 1716-1729.
[14] Köksoy O and Fan SS. An upside-down normal loss function-based method for quality improvement, Eng Optimiz 2012; 44(8): 935-945.
[15] Zeybek M and Köksoy O. Optimization of correlated multi-response quality engineering by the upside-down normal loss function. Eng Optimiz 2016; 48(8): 1419-1431.
[16] Zeybek M and Köksoy O. The effects of gamma noise on quality improvement. Commun Stat Simulat 2018 (in press). DOI:10.1080/03610918.2018.1506030
[17] Zeybek M. Process capability: A new criterion for loss function–based quality improvement. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 2018; 22: 470-477.
[18] Gupta HV and Kling H and Yilmaz KK and Martinez GF. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 2009; 377: 80-91.
[19] Murphy AH. Skill scores based on the mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient. Mon Weather Rev 1988; 116: 2417-2424.
[20] Weglarzyk S. The interdependence and applicability of some statistical quality measures for hydrological models. J Hydrol 1998; 206: 98-103.
[21] Zhong X and Dutta U. Engaging Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and model efficiency factor indicators in selecting and validating effective light rail system operation and maintenance cost models. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 2015; 3: 255- 265.
[22] Nash JE and Sutcliffe JV. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 1970; 119(3): 429-442.
[23] Box GEP and Draper NR: Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley&Sons, Canada, 1987, p. 688.