Abstract
We have developed a new simulation environment, called NeuVision, that is able to perform neuro-robotic experiments in a closed-loop architecture, by simulating a large-scale neuronal network bi-directionally connected to a robot. We conceived it primarily as a support tool to be used in the context of the ‘embodied electrophysiology’, a growing field that could help, in the future, to realize innovative bi-directional and adaptive Brain-Machine Interfaces. The main features of our system are related to the efficient visualization of the neural activity, the possibility to define different connectivity rules and stimulation points, and the integration of statistical analysis tools for fast neural dynamics characterization. Our preliminary results show that we are able to reproduce both spontaneous and evoked activity of cultured networks. Hence, by defining a decoding strategy based on the Center of Activity, we carried out experiments with a simulated neuronal network in a closed-loop with a robot. Our results suggest the NeuVision simulated environment could be used as a tool to support in vitro experiments with real systems.
References
[1] R.D. Beer, H.J. Chiel, R.D. Quinn, and R.E. Ritzmann, Biorobotic approaches to the study of motor systems, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8 (1998), 777-78210.1016/S0959-4388(98)80121-9Search in Google Scholar
[2] W.R. Ashby, Design for a brain, Chapman and Hall, London, 1952Search in Google Scholar
[3] T.B. DeMarse, D.A. Wagenaar, A.W. Blau, and S.M. Potter, The neurally controlled animat: biological brains acting with simulated bodies, Autonomous Robots, 11 (2001), 305-31010.1023/A:1012407611130Search in Google Scholar
[4] D.J. Bakkum, A.C. Shkolnik, G. Ben-Ary, P. Gamblen, T.B. DeMarse, and S.M. Potter, Removing some ‘A’ from AI: Embodied cultured networks, Embodied Artificial Intelligence, 3139, 2004, 130-145.10.1007/978-3-540-27833-7_10Search in Google Scholar
[5] G. Le Masson, S. Renaud-Le Masson, D. Debay, and T. Bal, Feedback inhibition controls spike transfer in hybrid thalamic circuits, Nature, 417, 2002, 854-8.10.1038/nature00825Search in Google Scholar
[6] D.A. Wagenaar, R. Madhavan, J. Pine, and S.M. Potter, Controlling bursting in cortical cultures with closed-loop multi-electrode stimulation, J. Neurosci., 25, 2005, 680-8.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4209-04.2005Search in Google Scholar
[7] G. Shahaf and S. Marom, Learning in networks of cortical neurons, J. Neurosci., 21, 2001, 8782-8.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-22-08782.2001Search in Google Scholar
[8] S. Marom and D. Eytan, Learning in ex-vivo developing networks of cortical neurons, Prog. Brain. Res., 147, 2005, 189-99.10.1016/S0079-6123(04)47014-9Search in Google Scholar
[9] B.D. Reger, K.M. Fleming, V. Sanguineti, S. Alford, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Connecting brains to robots: an artificial body for studying the computational properties of neural tissues, Artif Life, 6, 2000, 307-24.10.1162/106454600300103656Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] A. Karniel, M. Kositsky, K.M. Fleming, M. Chiappalone, V. Sanguineti, S. Alford, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Computational analysis in vitro: recurrent dynamics and plasticity in a neuro-robotic system, Journal of Neural Engineering, 2, 2005, S250-S265.10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S08Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] S. Martinoia, V. Sanguineti, L. Cozzi, L. Berdondini, J. Van Pelt, J. Tomas, G. Le Masson, and F.A. Davide, Towards an embodied in-vitro electrophysiology: the NeuroBIT project, Neurocomputing, 58-60, 2004, 1065-1072.10.1016/j.neucom.2004.01.167Search in Google Scholar
[12] A. Novellino, P. D'Angelo, L. Cozzi, M. Chiappalone, V. Sanguineti, and S. Martinoia, Connecting neurons to a mobile robot: an in vitro bidirectional neural interface, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2007.10.1155/2007/12725Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[13] S.M. Potter, Closing the loop between neurons and neurotechnology, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 2010, 15.10.3389/fnins.2010.00015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] M. Mulas, S. Martinoia, and P. Massobrio, NeuVision: a novel simulation environment to model spontaneous and stimulus-evoked activity of large-scale neuronal networks, Submitted to Neurocomputing.Search in Google Scholar
[15] J. Van Pelt, M.A. Corner, P.S. Wolters, W.L. Rutten, and G.J. Ramakers, Longterm stability and developmental changes in spontaneous network burst firing patterns in dissociated rat cerebral cortex cell cultures on multielectrode arrays, Neuroscience Letters, 361, 2004, 86-89.10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.062Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Z.C. Chao, D.J. Bakkum, and S.M. Potter, Region-specific network plasticity in simulated and living cortical networks: comparison of the center of activity trajectory (CAT) with other statistics, Journal of Neural Engineering, 4, 2007, 294-308.10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] E.M. Izhikevich, Simple model of spiking neurons, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6, 2003, 1569-157210.1109/TNN.2003.820440Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] E.M. Izhikevich, Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons?, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15, 2004, 1063-1070.10.1109/TNN.2004.832719Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] V. Braitenberg and A. Schultz, Anatomy of the cortex: statistics and geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
[20] S. Marom and G. Shahaf, Development, learning and memory in large random networks of cortical neurons: lessons beyond anatomy, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 35, 2002, 63-87.10.1017/S0033583501003742Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] B.J. Dworak and B.C. Wheeler, Novel MEA platform with PDMS microtunnels enables the detection of action potential propagation from isolated axons in culture, Lab on a Chip, 9, 2009, 404-410.10.1039/B806689BSearch in Google Scholar
[22] B.M. Waxman, Routing of multipoint connections, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 6, 1988, 1617-1622.10.1109/49.12889Search in Google Scholar
[23] M. Chiappalone, M. Bove, A. Vato, M. Tedesco, and S. Martinoia, Dissociated cortical networks show spontaneously correlated activity patterns during in vitro development, Brain Research, 1093, 2006, 41-53.10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.049Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] V. Pasquale, P. Massobrio, L.L. Bologna, M. Chiappalone, and S. Martinoia, Self-organization and neuronal avalanches in networks of dissociated cortical neurons, Neuroscience, 153, 2008, 1354-1369.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.050Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] L.L. Bologna, T. Nieus, M. Tedesco, M. Chiappalone, F. Benfenati, and S. Martinoia, Low-frequency stimulation enhances burst activity in cortical cultures during development, Neuroscience, 165, 2010, 692-704.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] M. Chiappalone, P. Massobrio, and S. Martinoia, Network plasticity in cultured cortical assemblies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2008, 221-237.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06259.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] Z.C. Chao, D.J. Bakkum, and S.M. Potter, Region-specific network plasticity in simulated and living cortical networks: comparison of the center of activity trajectory (CAT) with other statistics, Journal of Neural Engineering, 4, 2007, 294-308.10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[28] M. Gandolfo, A. Maccione, M. Tedesco, S. Martinoia, and L. Berdondini, Tracking burst patterns in hippocampal cultures with high-density CMOS-MEAs, Journal of Neural Engineering, 7, 2010, 056001.10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[29] Z.C. Chao, D.J. Bakkum, and S.M. Potter, Shaping Embodied Neural Networks for Adaptive Goal-directed Behavior, PLoS Computational Biology, 4, 2008, e1000042.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000042Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[30] N.T. Carnevale and M.L. Hines, The NEURON Book, Cambridge University Press, 2005.10.1017/CBO9780511541612Search in Google Scholar
[31] J.M. Bower and D. Beeman, The book of GENESIS: exploring realistic neural models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
[32] M.-O. Gewaltig and M. Diesmann, NEST (neural simulation tool), in Scholarpedia, 2007, p. 1430.10.4249/scholarpedia.1430Search in Google Scholar
[33] D. Goodman and R. Brette, Brian: a simulator for spiking neuronal networks in Python, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 2008.10.3389/neuro.11.005.2008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[34] D. Pecevski, T. Natschlager, and K. Schuch, PCSIM: a parallel simulation environment for neural circuits fully integrated with Python, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 3, 2009.10.3389/neuro.11.011.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[35] B. Aisa, B. Mingus, and R. O'Reilly, The emergent neural modeling system, Neural Networks, 21, 2008, 1045-1212.10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[36] C. Balkenius, J. Morén, B. Johansson, and M. Johnsson, Ikaros: building cognitive models for robots, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24 2010, 40-48.10.1016/j.aei.2009.08.003Search in Google Scholar
[37] S. Carpin, M. Lewis, J. Wang, S. Balakirsky, and C. Scrapper, USARSim: a robot simulator for research and education, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2007, 1400-1405.10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363180Search in Google Scholar
[38] B. Gerkey, R.T. Vaughan, and A. Howard, The Player/Stage project: tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems, Proceedings of Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR 2003) 2003, 317-323.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Microsoft. Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio. 2008 [cited]; Available from: http://www.microsoft.com/robotics/.Search in Google Scholar
© Marcello Mulas et al.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
