Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-12T12:30:13.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cores of Π1 1 sets of reals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Andreas Blass
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
Douglas Cenzer
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601

Extract

A classical result of descriptive set theory expresses every co-analytic subset of the real line as the union of an increasing sequence of Borel sets, the length of the chain being at most the first uncountable ordinal ℵ1 (see [5], [8]). An effective analog of this theorem, obtained by replacing co-analytic (Π1 1) and Borel (Δ1 1) with their lightface analogs, would represent every Π1 1 subset of the real line as the union of a chain of Δ1 1 sets. No such analog is true, however, because some Δ1 1 sets are not the union of their Δ1 1 subsets. For example, the set W, consisting of those reals which code well-orderings (in some standard coding) is Π1 1, but, by the boundedness principle ([3], [9]), any Δ1 1 subset of W contains codes only for well-orderings shorter than ω 1, the first nonrecursive ordinal. Accordingly, we define the core of a Π1 1 set to be the union of its Δ1 1 subsets; clearly this is the largest subset of the given Π1 1 set for which an effective version of the classical representation could exist.

In §1, we develop the elementary properties of cores of Π1 1 sets. For example, such a core is itself Π1 1 and can be represented as the union of a chain of Δ1 1 sets in a natural way; the chain will have length at most ω 1. We show that the core of a Π1 1 set is “almost all” of the set, while on the other hand there are uncountable Π1 1 sets with empty cores.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Cenzer, D., Inductively defined sets of reals, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (to appear).Google Scholar
[2] Cenzer, D., Monotone inductive definitions over the continuum (to appear).Google Scholar
[3] Cenzer, D., Ordinal recursion and inductive definitions, Generalized recursion theory, Oslo 1972 (Fenstad, J. E. and Hinman, P., Editors) North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 221–264.Google Scholar
[4] Hinman, P., Recursion-theoretic hierarchies, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York (to appear).Google Scholar
[5] Kuratowski, K., Topologie, Monografie Matematyczne, Warsaw, 1950.Google Scholar
[6] Rogers, H., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[7] Sacks, G., Measure-theoretic uniformity, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 142 (1969), pp. 381–420.Google Scholar
[8] Solovay, R., On the cardinality of Σ2 1 sets of reals, Foundations of mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
[9] Spector, C., Recursive well-orderings, this Journal, vol. 20 (1955), pp. 151–163.Google Scholar
[10] Tanaka, H., Notes on measure and category in recursion theory, Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, vol. 3 (1970), pp. 231–241.Google Scholar
[11] Thomason, S. K., The forcing method and the upper semilattice of hyperdegrees, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 129 (1967), pp. 38–57.Google Scholar