https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2029-853X
Figures
Abstract
Tetraena mongolica, Zygophyllum xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago are three typical dryland plants with important ecological values in subfamily Zygophylloideae of Zygophyllaceae. Studies on the chloroplast genomes of them are favorable for understanding the diversity and phylogeny of Zygophyllaceae. Here, we sequenced and assembled the whole chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, and performed comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis. The total size, structure, gene content and orders of these three chloroplast genomes were similar, and the three chloroplast genomes exhibited a typical quadripartite structure with a large single-copy region (LSC; 79,696–80,291 bp), a small single-copy region (SSC; 16,462–17,162 bp), and two inverted repeats (IRs; 4,288–4,413 bp). A total of 107 unique genes were identified from the three chloroplast genomes, including 70 protein-coding genes, 33 tRNAs, and 4 rRNAs. Compared with other angiosperms, the three chloroplast genomes were significantly reduced in overall length due to an unusual 16–24 kb shrinkage of IR regions and loss of the 11 genes which encoded subunits of NADH dehydrogenase. Genome-wide comparisons revealed similarities and variations between the three species and others. Phylogenetic analysis based on the three chloroplast genomes supported the opinion that Zygophyllaceae belonged to Zygophyllales in Fabids, and Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago belonged to Zygophyllum. The genome-wide comparisons revealed the similarity and variations between the chloroplast genomes of the three Zygophylloideae species and other plant species. This study provides a valuable molecular biology evidence for further studies of phylogenetic status of Zygophyllaceae.
Citation: Wang X, Dorjee T, Chen Y, Gao F, Zhou Y (2022) The complete chloroplast genome sequencing analysis revealed an unusual IRs reduction in three species of subfamily Zygophylloideae. PLoS ONE 17(2): e0263253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253
Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang, National Cheng Kung University, TAIWAN
Received: May 23, 2021; Accepted: January 17, 2022; Published: February 2, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data are available in the public NCBI GenBank database (accession number MK331720, MZ427318, and MK341052).
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 31770363 and 31670335) by YZ, and the Ministry of Education of China through 111 and "Double First-Class" projects (Grant number B08044 and Yldxxk201819) by YZ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Tetraena mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago are three typical dryland plants belonging to the subfamily Zygophylloideae of Zygophyllaceae [1–3]. Zygophyllaceae are a family of about 350 species in 27 genera, and plants in Zygophyllaceae are mainly distributed in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions in Asia, Africa, Europe, America, and Australia. In China, there are 5 subfamilies, 6 genera, 31 species, 2 subspecies, and 4 varieties of Zygophyllaceae plants. Zygophyllaceae plants are usually herbs, shrubs, or subshrub, and most of them are tolerant to drought and salt stress, and can grow in barren soil in the arid and semi-arid regions, that represents high ecological importance of the species.
There are different points of view on the taxonomic status of Zygophyllaceae. According to Cronquist system [3], Zygophyllaceae was classified into Sapindales based on its morphological characteristic. However, Zygophyllaceae was classified in the order of Geraniales in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae [4] and Flora of China [5], based on the morphological feature. The angiosperm taxonomy published by the angiosperm phylogenetic group (APG) from 1998 is making efforts to build a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants based on DNA sequence data [6]. In APG IV system published in 2016 [7], Zygophyllaceae were included in Zygophyllales, and Zygophyllales was classified in the legumes of Rosids in the core eudicotyledons, as a base group of this branch. In addition, according to Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, there are six genera in Zygophyllaceae, including Tetrahedral, Sarcozygium, Zygophyllum, Nitraria, Peganum, and Tribulus, but in Flora of China, there are only three genera included in Zygophyllaceae, Tetrahedral, Zygophyllum, and Tribulus. Sarcozygium was classified into Zygophyllum, and Nitraria and Peganum are classified as two new families, Nitrariaceae and Peganaceae. More evidence is needed to clarify these taxonomic issues.
The chloroplast genome is a suitable tool for studying evolution and phylogenetics of plants because of its highly conserved sequence and structure [8]. As one of the two semi-autonomous organelles in plant cells [9], chloroplast is the main site of photosynthesis [10, 11]. The chloroplast genome of most angiosperms is inherited from the maternal line, while that of gymnosperms is mainly inherited from the paternal line [12]. In general, chloroplast genome exhibits a typical quadripartite structure, ranging in size from 120kb to 200kb, including a double-stranded closed loop with a long single-copy sequence (LSC, 80 kb-90 kb), a short single-copy sequence (SSC, 16 kb-27 kb), and two reverse repeat sizes (IRs, 20 kb-28 kb) with roughly equal length [9, 13]. The nucleotide sequence of chloroplast DNA provides a large amount of information, including not only related information on protein-encoding and non-coding genes, but also data to infer gene rearrangement and evolutionary relationships [14, 15]. The chloroplast genome has become an indispensable molecular resource for species identification, molecular barcode, population genetics and phylogenetic research [16–18], also the comparative analysis based on chloroplast genomes reveals gene rearrangement events and evolutionary histories.
Previous studies have reported the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago. However, further studies are needed to deeply explore the structure and phylogenetic status of the three species [19, 20]. In the present study, the complete chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago were sequenced by using Illumina sequencing platform, and then assembled and annotated. Comparative genomics tools were used to reveal the conservation and variations in chloroplast genomes of these three species. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted by using the complete chloroplast genome sequences of various species to explore the phylogenetic position of these three species in Zygophyllaceae.
Materials and methods
Plant material, DNA extraction and sequencing
Fresh leaves of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago were gathered from adult plants in Mengxi Town, Erdos City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, in China. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves utilizing the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Beijing, China). The quality of DNA samples was assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis. Illumina paired-end DNA libraries with approximately 300 bp insert fragment were built using the NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq2500.
Chloroplast genome assembly and annotation
The raw data were processed by filtering adapter and low-quality reads using fastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), then the clean data were used for genome assembly. GetOrganelle (https://github.com/Kinggerm/GetOrganelle) [21] and SPAdes (v. 3.9.0) [22] were used to assemble the clean data using the default parameter. The chloroplast genome assembly was then identified from the assembled sequences by align to Tribulus terrestris (NC_046758), Arabidopsis and tobacco chloroplast genomes [11, 23]. The online annotation tool DOGMA (http://dogma.ccbb.utexas.edu) [24] was utilized to annotate the protein-coding genes, tRNAscan-SE [25, 26] software was used to annotate the tRNA gene, and RNAmmer 1.2 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/RNAmmer/) [27] was used for rRNA identification. The annotation results were edited using Sequin, and the resulting Sqn file was submitted to the GenBank database. The GenBank accession number of the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago were MK331720, MZ427318, and MK341052, respectively. The GenBank annotation files were submitted to Organellar Genome DRAW (OGDRAW) [28] to draw the visualized chloroplast genome map.
Loss of ndh genes verification
To verify the loss of ndh genes in the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, leaf DNA samples were extracted from tobacco and these three species and PCR experiments were performed on fragment psaC-ndhE-ndhG-ndhI-ndhA-ndhH-rps15 and rps7-ndhB-trnL-CAA of the tobacco chloroplast genome and the fragment psaC-rps15 and rps7-trnL-CAA of the chloroplast genomes in the three species. The PCR products were sequenced (BBI Life Sciences Co., Shanghai, China), and the sequencing results were spliced and compared with the references of the corresponding species. Details of gene fragments selected and primers in PCR were list in S1 Table.
Genomic structure analysis
The Perl script MISA (https://webblast.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/) [29] was used to detect microsatellites (mononucleotides, dinucleotides, trinucleotides, tetranucleotides, pentanucleotides, hexanucleotides) from three chloroplast genomes of Zygophyllaceae plants with the following thresholds: 10 repeat units of mononucleotide SSR, 6 repeat units of dinucleotide SSR, 5 repeat units of trinucleotide, tetranucleotide, pentanucleotide and hexanucleotide SSR. The online software REPuter (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/reputer) (University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany) [30] was utilized to predict the location and size of the repeat sequences, with the parameter set to spread the repeat copy at a percentage of at least 90% similarity, the minimum repeat size parameter was set as 30 bp.
Identification of polymorphic loci
Multiple alignment was conducted among the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago after removing of IRA region utilizing MAFFT v7 [31]. The protein-coding regions and intergenic spacer regions were isolated from the alignment using Geneious R8.1 [32]. The nucleotide diversity values (Pi) and polymorphism of each sequence were calculated in DnaSP 6.12 [33] to investigate the polymorphic loci.
Codon usage analysis
The distribution of codon usage was analyzed using the software CodonW (University of Texas, Houston, TX USA) [34] with the Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) value. RSCU value is an efficient index reflecting non-uniform usage of synonymous codons in a given coding sequence. In general, the RSCU value without any codon usage bias equals 1.00, and a RSCU below 1.00 indicates the relative probability of codon utilization is lower than expectation, just as the codon utilization frequency is higher than expectation while the RSCU may be above 1.00.
Comparative genomics analysis
The comparison of gene order between chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica (MK331720), Z. xanthoxylon (MZ427318), Z. fabago (MK341052), A. trichopoda (NC_005086.1), A. carambola (NC_033350.1), L. usitatissimum (NC_036356.1), E. novogranatense (NC_030601.1), G. maderense (NC_029999.1), and E. carvifolium (NC_015083.1) was performed using MAUVE [35]. The online program mVISTA (http://genome.lbl.gov/vista/mvista/submit.shtml) [36] was utilized to find the divergence of chloroplast genomes of three species in Shuffle-LAGAN mode. The sequences were initially aligned according to MAFFT v7 [31] and manually adjusted based on BioEdit v7.0.9 [37].
Phylogenetic analysis
Chloroplast genomes of 69 plant species were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees, and these species belong to Caryophyllales, Santalales, Vitales, Myrtales, Brassicales, Huerteales, Malvales, Sapindales, Oxalidales, Malpighiales, Celastrales, Rosales, Fagales, Cucurbitales, Zygophyllales, Fabales and Geraniales (S2 Table). The chloroplast genomes of 66 species were downloaded from the NCBI database to construct the phylogenetic tree using the Maximum Likelihood method. A. trichopoda were set as outgroup. The sequences of 50 shared protein-coding genes (atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, atpI, ccsA, cemA, matK, petA, petB, petD, petG, petL, petN, psaA, psaC, psaI, psaJ, psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbM, psbN, psbT, rbcL, rpl14, rpl16, rpl20, rpl22, rpl32, rpl36, rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1, rpoC2, rps3, rps4, rps8, rps14, rps18, ycf3, ycf4) were extracted using TBtools V0.6669 [38] and aligned by MAFFT v7.427 [31]. After manual adjustment of the alignment, phylogenetic trees were rebuilt based on 50 common protein-coding gene sequences using MEGA X [39] software with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Results
Genome content and organizations
Approximately 3 G, 3 G, and 7.1 G of 150 bp pair-end clean reads for T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, respectively, were got from the Illumina sequencing, while the reads were assembled using GetOrganelle and SPAdes (Fig 1). The overall size of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago chloroplast genomes are 106,081 bp, 105,423 bp, and 104,984 bp, respectively, which are significantly smaller than most of the plant chloroplast genomes. The chloroplast genomes of the three species show the typical quadripartite structure of angiosperm cpDNA, which consist of a large single copy (LSC) region of 80,291 bp in T. mongolica, 79,877 bp in Z. xanthoxylon, and 79,696 bp in Z. fabago, a small single copy (SSC) region of 17,162 bp in T. mongolica, 16,970 bp in Z. xanthoxylon, and 16,462 bp in Z. fabago, and a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) of 4,315 bp in T. mongolica, 4,288 bp in Z. xanthoxylon, and 4,413 bp in Z. fabago. The GC content of the chloroplast genomes are 33.7%, 34.06%, and 36.0%, respectively.
The predicted genes are displayed and colors indicate functional classifications in the legend. The genes outside the circle are transcribed clockwise, whereas those inside the circle are transcribed counterclockwise. The inner gray circle describes the GC content. The large single copy (LSC), small single copy (SSC) and inverted repeat (IR) regions are marked in the inner circle.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g001
All the three chloroplast genomes encode 107 unique genes, including 70 protein-coding genes, 4 rRNA genes, and 33 tRNA genes (Tables 1 and 2). It is noteworthy that the rRNA genes located in IRs region in most higher plants present in the SSC region of the three Zygophyllaceae plants, and subsequently the copy number of rRNA genes change from 2 to 1. We compared the three Zygophyllaceae chloroplast genomes with that of Amborella trichopoda, which was thought to be the most primitive group of angiosperms, and the result showed that all the ndh genes encoding subunits of NADH oxidoreductase were lost in T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago which usually located in SSC and IRs. Moreover, rps16, rpl12, ycf2 and infA, which were common in the chloroplast genomes of most angiosperms, lost in the chloroplast genomes of these three Zygophyllaceae plants.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.t001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.t002
To verify the loss of ndh genes in chloroplast genomes of these three species, utilizing tobacco as the reference, the gene fragment psaC-ndhE-ndhG-ndhI-ndhA-ndhH-rps15 and rps7-ndhB-trnL-CAA located in SSC and IRA regions of tobacco chloroplast genome and the corresponding fragments in chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago were selected for verification. The results showed that ndhE, ndhG, ndhI, ndhA, ndhH and ndhB genes were lost in the selected fragments of chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago (Fig 2).
Tobacco chloroplast genome as the reference. (a) Comparison of the fragment psaC-ndhE-ndhG-ndhI-ndhA-ndhH-rps15 in tobacco and corresponding regions in the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago. (b) Comparison of the fragment rps7-ndhB-trnL-CAA in tobacco and corresponding regions in chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago. The screenshots indicated by the blue arrows were excerpts from the PCR sequencing results of each gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g002
Introns play crucial roles in the regulation of gene expression [40–42]. In the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago, 14 genes (trnK-UUU, trnG-GCC, atpF, rpoC1, trnL-UAA, trnV-UAC, clpP, petB, petD, rpl16, rpl2, trnA-UGC, trnl-GAU and rpl2) contain one intron, while one gene (ycf3) contain two introns (Table 3). The trnK-UUU gene, which contains the matK gene, has the largest intron with a length of 2544–2551 bp, while the length of other introns ranged from 455 bp to 943 bp.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.t003
Repeat and SSRs analysis
Basic units made by 1–6 nucleotides repeated for several times form SSRs (Simple sequence repeats), which are widely utilized as molecular markers in molecular biology studies [43–45]. The types and distribution of SSRs in the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago were predicted. The total number of SSRs detected in T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago were 76, 65, and 78. The most common SSRs were A or T mononucleotide repeats, accounting for 98.7%, 93.8%, and 97.4%, while no G or C repeats were predicted. In addition, mononucleotide and dinucleotides were identified in T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago, respectively, and no trinucleotide, tetranucleotide, pentanucleotide, and hexanucleotide SSRs were predicted (Table 4). Most SSRs of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago were located in LSC regions (84.2%, 80.0%, and 84.6%, respectively), followed by SSC regions (13.2%, 10.8%, and 7.7%, respectively) (Table 5).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.t004
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.t005
We used REPuter [30] and Tandm Repeats Finder [46] to identify the palindrome repeats, forward repeats, reverse repeats, and tandem repeats of chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago (Fig 3). A total of 53, 40, and 38 long repeats were detected in three chloroplast genomes (Fig 3a). The chloroplast genome of T. mongolica contained 49 tandem repeats, 3 palindrome repeats, and 1 reverse repeats. The chloroplast genome of Z. xanthoxylon contained 36 tandem repeats and 4 palindrome repeats, while the chloroplast genome of Z. fabago contained 34 tandem repeats, 3 palindrome repeats, and 1 reverse repeats (Fig 3b). In the three chloroplast genomes, long repeats with the length of 10 bp was the most common category, and then 11 bp and 12 bp categories (Fig 3c).
(a) Number of long repeats; (b) Number of different long repeats types; (c) Sequence length of long repeats.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g003
Polymorphic loci analysis
The polymorphism of each region was exhibited (Fig 4). We selected 8 polymorphic regions with the length>300 bp and nucleotide diversity values (Pi)>0.1, trnK-UUU-trnQ-UUG, trnS-GCU-trnG-GCC, trnT-UGU-trnL-UAA, rbcL-accD, rpl33-rps18, trnI-CAU-ycf15, rps15-trnN-GUU and trnV-GAC-rps7 (Table 6). All regions selected belonged to intergenic spacer regions, of which 5 presented in LSC region, 2 in SSC region and 1 in IR region.
Regions with Pi = 0 are excluded and are not exhibited in the figure. The black starts show 8 polymorphic loci with the length>300 bp and Pi>0.1. The X-axis indicates chloroplast regions and the y-axis nucleotide diversity values (Pi).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g004
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.t006
Codon usage
Codon preference (codon usage bias) indicates the result of combined action of natural selection, species mutations, and genetic drift [47]. In the present study, according to the sequences of protein-coding genes, the frequency of codon usage of the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago was assessed (Figs 5 and 6). On the whole, the coding preferences of the three chloroplast genomes are very similar. All protein-coding genes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago consist of 35360, 35141, and 34994 codons, respectively. Among all these codons, isoleucine and methionine are the most frequently and the least frequently occurring amino acids in three chloroplast genomes. Specifically, there are up to 3362 (9.51%), 3362 (9.57%), and 3417(9.76%) isoleucine-encoding codons in chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, respectively; while there are 590 (1.67%), 619 (1.76%), and 615(1.76%) methionine-encoding codons in chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, respectively (Fig 5).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g005
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g006
Relative synonymous codon usage analysis indicated that there was more than one synonym codon for almost all (except methionine) amino acids in the three chloroplast genomes, and the codons of UGG (tryptophan) and AUG (methionine) exhibited no usage bias (RSCU = 1) (Fig 6). About half of the codons have a RSCU value of >1.00 (30, 30, and 32 for the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, respectively), and all codons with usage bias (RSCU>1) except CGU ended with A or U.
Comparative genomics analysis
To detect gene loss and inversion, we compared the chloroplast genomes of the three Zygophyllaceae species with those of Averrhoa carambola, Linum usitatissimum, Erythroxylum novogranatense, Geranium maderense, and Erodium carvifolium, using MAUVE. The results pointed out that the size of the chloroplast genomes of the three Zygophyllaceae species were approximately (10–60) kb smaller than those of other species (Fig 7), and all 11 genes which encoded the subunits of NADH dehydrogenase (ndh gene) were lost from SSC and IRs. Moreover, the 4 rRNA that appeared in the IR region in most other plant were transferred to the SSC region in the three Zygophyllaceae species. In addition, compared with other species, there were no gene inversions in LSC region, SSC region, and IR region in the chloroplast genomes of the three Zygophyllaceae species.
A. trichopoda chloroplast genome as reference, utilizing MAUVE software. The boxes above the line indicate the gene sequences in clockwise direction and the boxes below the line indicate gene sequences in counterclockwise direction.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g007
In order to characterize genomic divergence between T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, mVISTA software was employed to identify the divergent regions in the chloroplast genomes of the three Zygophyllaceae species, and Tribulus terrestris chloroplast genome was utilized as reference (Fig 8). The two IR regions were more conserved than LSC and SSC region, and the non-coding regions exhibited higher divergence than the coding regions. Moreover, the highest divergent regions in the three chloroplast genomes were detected in the intergenic spacer regions, including trnK-trnQ, trnQ-psbK, trnS-trnG, trnG-trnR, trnR-atpA, atpF-atpH, trnR-atpA, rpoC1-rpoB, petN-psbM, trnE-trnT, trnG-UCC-trnfM-CAU, psbA-ycf3, trnT-trnL, trnF-trnV, atpB-rbcL, rbcL-accD, psbE-petL, rpl33-rps18, rps18-rpl20, rpl36-rps8, trnI-ycf15, psaC-rps15, rps15-trnN, trnN-trnR, trnV-rps12, rps7-rpl32, and rpl32-trnL.
Gray arrows and thick black lines above the alignment represent gene direction. Purple bars show exons, sky-blue bars show transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), red bars show non-coding sequences (CNS) and white peaks show the differences between chloroplast genomes. The y-axis indicates the identity percentage ranging from 50 to 100%.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g008
Phylogenetic analysis
To investigate the phylogenetic status of the three Zygophyllaceae species in angiosperms and their interspecific relationships, 50 protein-coding genes from 69 plant species were phylogenetically analyzed using MEGA X software (Fig 9). All the plants chosen belong to the Core Eudicots branch according to the APG classification [6, 7, 48, 49]. The results indicated that Caryophyllales and Santalales were early-divergent angiosperms, and order Vitales was the earliest divergent clade of Rosids. Of Malvids and Fabids clades, Myrtales, Geraniales, and Zygophyllales were early evolutionary groups. As expected, the three Zygophyllaceae species were clustered in the Fabids clade together with Oxalidales, Malpighiales, Celastrales, Rosales, Fagales, Cucurbitales, and Fabales. But unexpected, the four Zygophyllales plants were clustered in one branch with Geraniales and Fabales, considered that Geraniales was classified in Malvids according to the latest APG classification. In Zygophyllaceae, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago formed a monophyletic branch with 100% bootstrap value, and the branch was sister clade to the genus Tetraena.
A. trichopoda was set as the outgroup. Bootstrap supports were calculated from 1000 replicates. ▲ Represent the bootstrap value. ★ Represent the missing evolutionary branch of the 11 gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g009
IR expansion and contraction
Although the IR region is thought to be the most conserved region in chloroplast genome, the contraction and expansion of the IR region boundary is a common phenomenon in the evolution of the chloroplast genome and the main cause of the chloroplast genome size alteration [50–52]. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the IR/LSC and IR/SSC boundary regions of T. terrestris, T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago (Fig 10). In these three chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, no pseudogenes and genes crossing the border were found. The boundary was between rpl22 and trnH-GUG on the IRB/LSC side, and between trnH-GUG and psbA on the IRA/LSC side. In T. mongolica, the boundary of IRB/SSC was located between trnL-CAA and trnL-UAG, and the boundary of IRA/SSC was between rpl32 and trnL-CAA. In Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago, the boundary of IRB/SSC was located between rpl32 and trnL-CAA, and the boundary of IRA/SSC was between rps7 and trnL-CAA.
Gene names are shown in boxes, and genes lengths in the corresponding regions are marked above the boxes. These features are not to scale.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.g010
Specifically, in the IR region of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago, trnH-GUG deviates from the IR/LSC boundary by 129 bp, 155 bp, and 164 bp, respectively. trnL-CAA is 566 bp, 449 bp, 594 bp, respectively, from the IR/SSC boundary. The gene rpl22 located in LSC, which was 13–28 bp from the IRB/LSC border, similarly, the gene psbA deviated from the IRA/LSC by 80–130 bp. Among the three species, the genes close to the IR/SSC border in SSC were different. In T. mongolica, trnL-UAG was 554bp from IRB/SSC boundary, and rpl32 was 46bp from IRA/SSC boundary. In both Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago, rpl32 and rps7 located close to the border of IRB/SSC and IRA/SSC.
Discussion
The sizes of the three Zygophyllaceae chloroplast genomes are significantly shorter than those of most angiosperms. In majority of angiosperms, the chloroplast genomes are 120–160 kb in length, while the sizes of the chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago range from 104 to 106 kb. The LSC regions of most angiosperms are generally about 80–90 kb in length, while the SSC regions are about 16–27 kb in length, and the size of two IRs are approximately 20–28 kb. Compared with most angiosperms, the sizes of LSC and SSC of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago don’t change significantly, and the most conspicuous change is occurred in two IRs reduced by about 16–24 kb in size. Thus, the reduced sizes of chloroplast genomes of these three Zygophyllaceae species are mainly associated with the shrinkage of IRs.
Although the chloroplast genome is highly conservative, several chloroplast genomes are significantly smaller than that of most other plants, and some of them are listed in S3 Table. The most common reports of small chloroplast genomes came from studies of chloroplast genomes in parasitic plants, including Taxillus chinensis and T. sutchuenensis in Loranthaceae of Santalales [53], Epifagus virginiana in Orobanchaceae of Lamiales [54], Cuscuta chinensis and C. japonica in Convolvulaceae of Solanales [55]. Smaller chloroplast genomes were also found in some gymnosperms such as Welwitschia mirabilis in Welwitschiaceae of Welwitschiales [56], and Gnetum ula in Gnetaceae of Gnetales [57]. In non-parasitic angiosperms, the chloroplast genome with the size smaller than 130 kb was rarely reported except Astragalus membranaceus, whose chloroplast genome was approximately 124 kb, partly due to the loss of an IR [58]. The shrinkage of chloroplast genomes of the other plant species were associated with significant reduction in size of SSCs, for example, the SSCs of chloroplast genomes of the parasitic plants in S3 Table were less than half of that in tobacco [59], a classical angiosperm chloroplast genome. In the three Zygophyllaceae species, the sizes of LSC and SSC decrease slightly, but the lengths of IRs decrease dramatically. Thus, the three Zygophyllaceae species could be utilized as novel models to investigate the evolution of chloroplast genome structure and size.
Comparison of three Zygophyllaceae chloroplast genomes with those of other plant species reveal that, 4 rRNA genes usually presented in IRs are located in SSC region in these three chloroplast genomes, and thus leading to the reduction of the copy number of rRNA genes. In addition, it had been reported that due to the contraction and expansion of IR regions in the chloroplast genome of Pothos scandens in Araceae, some genes which existed in IR regions transferred to the LSC region becoming single copy and most of genes which appeared in SSC region transferred to the IR regions turning into duplicated, resulting in the change of gene numbers and the increased size of LSC region and the decreased size of SSC region [60]. Different from our study, although the IR regions had contracted and expanded, there was no loss of genes and no significant change in the size of the chloroplast genome in Pothos scandens. Similar to our observation, previous studies had reported rRNA gene displacement in Erodium species [61]. And all ndh genes usually located in SSC and IRs region encoding subunits of NADH oxidoreductase are lost. Moreover, rps16, rpl12, ycf2 and infA, which are common in most angiosperm chloroplast genomes, are lost in chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago. All above may be the possible reasons for the size reduction of IRs region. In addition, the NADH dehydrogenase complex in plant plastids are involved in photosynthesis in response to environmental stress. Although very uncommon, the ndh gene losses or pseudogenization are widespread phenomena in chloroplasts of different lineages of seed plants which are photoautotrophic [62]. The phenomenon had been reported that the ndh genes of plant plastid were specifically lost and NDH subunits which were nuclear-encoded were expression in Pinaceae [57], Orchidaceae [63], gnetophytes [64] and Geraniales [61]. Adaptation to the environment is especially critical for plants grow in barren soil in the arid and semi-arid regions. The current result reveals the loss of 11 ndh genes in these chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago, and it is not certain whether ndh genes encoded by plastid have been lost completely or moved to cell nucleus functionally for the three Zygophylloideae species, which deserves to be discussed.
Previously reports had shown that losses of plastid-encoded ndh genes in Pinaceae possibly occurred before the divergence of this lineage (140 MYA) [57, 65]. The most recent losses of plastid-encoded ndh genes were found in a long divergent branch with 13 species in Erodium which had been supposed to predate the divergence of this branch (3 MYA) [61, 62]. A more recent phenomenon of pseudogenization of 4 ndh genes in genus Melianthus of Geraniales [66]. This branch was found to have diversified about 2 MYA and preserved some translatable sequences in the plastome [62]. In our study, T. mongolica was from the genus Tetraena of Zygophylloideae, and Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago belonged to the genus Zygophyllum of Zygophylloideae. All 11 plastid-encoded ndh genes were loss in the three species. However, the ndh genes were intact in chloroplasts of Larrea tridentata of Larreoideae and Tribulus terrestris of Tribuloideae. Subfamily Larreoideae and Tribuloideae were classified into Zygophyllaceae. It might suggest that the loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes in the three species involved in our study had possibly occurred ahead of the divergence of subfamily Zygophylloideae (38 MYA) [67]. However, due to the limited number of species chosen in our study, more species from Zygophyllaceae and Zygophylloideae could be added in subsequent studies which is helpful to further explore the loss of ndh genes and the function of NADH complex in Zygophyllaceae.
In prior studies, the correlations of repeats, SNPs and InDels were analyzed in chloroplast genomes of Malvaceae [68]. It was shown fluctuations in correlations at the family level, the subfamily level and the genus level in quantitative researches. While up to 90% of repeats and SNPs were simultaneous, and 52%-72% of repeats contained InDels at the family and subfamily level in qualitative studies. And it was hypothesized that the correlations among mutation events might be a usual feature in plant chloroplast genomes. This showed the important role of repeats in the generation of SNPs and InDels. 10 polymorphic loci were identified in chloroplast genomes of Blumea species, among which 5 regions were concurrent with repeats [69]. In our current study, we identified 8 polymorphic loci, and 7 were existed in the regions where repeats emerged except rps15-trnN-GUU. The co-occurrence proportion of repeats and polymorphic loci was as high as 87.5%. This result also supported the view that repeats could be utilized to identify the polymorphic loci for future researches on phylogeny and taxonomic status of plant.
Phylogenetic trees based on 50 common protein-coding genes in the chloroplast genomes of 69 plant species provide crucial molecular evidence for exploring the phylogenetic status of the three Zygophyllaceae species. Considered that Zygophyllaceae had been classified in the order of Geraniales in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae [4] and Flora of China [5], our results support the latest taxonomic classification of Zygophyllaceae described in APG IV in which Zygophyllaceae belongs to Fabids rather than Malvids. T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon and Z. fabago are clustered into a single branch with Larrea tridentata, which is another species in Zygophyllaceae, and the four Zygophyllaceae species are clustered in the Fabids clade together with Oxalidales, Malpighiales, Celastrales, Rosales, Fagales, Cucurbitales, and Fabales. Our phylogenetic analyses also reveal the close relationship between Z. fabago and Z. xanthoxylon, and support the incorporation of the Z. xanthoxylon into the genus Zygophyllum.
At the same time, our phylogenetic analysis also raises some new speculations on the evolutionary status of Zygophyllaceae and other related taxonomic branch, which need to be investigated further. First, our results show that Zygophyllales is clustered in a small branch with Fabales, but not with other orders in Fabids like Oxalidales, Malpighiales, and Rosales, indicating a closer relationship between Zygophyllales and Fabales which is not reported in previous reports. Second, it is surprisingly to find Zygophyllales of Fabids are clustered in a single clade with many plant species in Geraniales, which are classified into Malvids according to APG IV [7]. Our results raise a possibility that at least part of species in Geraniales belong to Fabids instead of Malvids, just as Zygophyllales was once classified in Malvids and is now classified in Fabids.
It should be noted that in our study the phylogenetic tree was constructed based on 69 species belonging to 51 genera and 30 families, including plants from Oxalidales, Malpighiales, Celastrales, Rosales, Fagales, Cucurbitales and Fabales which were also classified into Fabids like Zygophyllaceae, and species from Malvids with disputed classification. Four species from two subfamilies (six in total) of Zygophyllaceae, among which three species from two genera (six in total) of Zygophylloideae, were chosen in this study. The three species were T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago with significant shortage in size of the chloroplast genomes which were concerned in our study. Based on the limited number of species selected, future research could consider more species of Zygophyllaceae to conduct more detailed phylogeny analysis. It will be helpful to explore the phylogenetic status and evolution of Zygophyllaceae.
In brief, we assemble the whole chloroplast genomes of T. mongolica, Z. xanthoxylon, and Z. fabago. Our study reveals the unusual reduction of the three chloroplast genomes, especially IR regions, and the loss of 11 genes cording subunits of NADH dehydrogenase in SSC and IRs region. Comparative genomics identify the genetic variation between the chloroplast genomes of the three Zygophyllaceae species and other plant species. Phylogenetic analysis according to 50 common protein-coding genes of 69 plant chloroplast genomes support current understanding of the phylogenetic status of Zygophyllaceae.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Details of gene fragments selected and corresponding primers in PCR to verify the loss of ndh genes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Chloroplast genomes of the sixty-nine plant species used for phylogenetic analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Reported chloroplast genomes with size smaller than 130 kb and tobacco chloroplast genome.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263253.s003
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. MERHABA ABLA (College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China) for her help during field work.
References
- 1. Ge XJ, Hwang CC, Liu ZH, Huang CC, Huang WH, Hung KH, et al. Conservation genetics and phylogeography of endangered and endemic shrub Tetraena mongolica (Zygophyllaceae) in Inner Mongolia, China. BMC Genet. 2011; 12: 1. pmid:21205287.
- 2. Bellstedt DU, van Zyl L, Marais EM, Bytebier B, de Villiers CA, Makwarela AM, et al. Phylogenetic relationships, character evolution and biogeography of southern African members of Zygophyllum (Zygophyllaceae) based on three plastid regions. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008; 47: 932–949. pmid:18407526.
- 3. Anderson WR. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Brittonia. 1982; 34: 268–270.
- 4.
Xu LR, Huang CJ. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae vol. 43(1), Zygophyllaceae. Beijing: Science Press; 1998.
- 5.
Liu YX, Zhou LH. Flora of China vol. 11, Zygophyllaceae. Beijing: Science Press; 2008.
- 6. Chase MW, Fay MF, Savolainen V. Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon. 2000; 49: 685–704.
- 7. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016; 181: 1–20.
- 8. Maier RM, Neckermann K, Igloi GL, Kössel H. Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome: gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine tuning of genetic information by transcript editing. J Mol Biol. 1995; 251: 614–628. pmid:7666415.
- 9. Palmer JD. Comparative organization of chloroplast genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 1985; 19: 325–354. pmid:3936406.
- 10. Hiratsuka J, Shimada H, Whittier R, Ishibashi T, Sakamoto M, Mori M, et al. The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa) chloroplast genome: intermolecular recombination between distinct tRNA genes accounts for a major plastid DNA inversion during the evolution of the cereals. Mol Gen Genet. 1989; 217: 185–194. pmid:2770692.
- 11. Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, et al. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 1986; 5: 2043–2049. pmid:16453699.
- 12. Martin W, Rujan T, Richly E, Hansen A, Cornelsen S, Lins T, et al. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 12246–12251. pmid:12218172.
- 13. Wang RJ, Cheng CL, Chang CC, Wu CL, Su TM, Chaw SM. Dynamics and evolution of the inverted repeat-large single copy junctions in the chloroplast genomes of monocots. BMC Evol Biol. 2008; 8: 36. pmid:18237435.
- 14. Reith M, Munholland J. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Porphyra purpurea chloroplast genome. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1995; 13: 333–335.
- 15. Golenberg EM, Clegg MT, Durbin ML, Doebley J, Ma DP. Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1993; 2: 52–64. pmid:8081547.
- 16. Mason-Gamer RJ, Holsinger KE, Jansen RK. Chloroplast DNA Haplotype Variation within and among Populations of Coreopsis grandiflora (Asteraceae). Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12: 371–381.
- 17. Byrne M, Moran GF. Population divergence in the chloroplast genome of Eucalyptus nitens. Heredity. 1994; 73: 18–28.
- 18. Ren BQ, Xiang XG, Chen ZD. Species identification of Alnus (Betulaceae) using nrDNA and cpDNA genetic markers. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010; 10: 594–605. pmid:21565064.
- 19. Ma X, Chang JY, Li ZH, Zhai W, Yu XX, Feng YL. The complete chloroplast genome of Tetraena mongolica (Zygophyllaceae), an endangered shrub endemic to China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2019; 4: 1030–1031.
- 20. Xu HM, Fu WR, Xie W, Wang YG, Zhang YF. The complete chloroplast genomes of two species of Zygophyllum (Zygophyllaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2020; 5: 3476–3477. pmid:33458209.
- 21. Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang JB, Song Y, dePamphilis CW, Yi TS, et al. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020; 21: 241. pmid:32912315.
- 22. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012; 19: 455–477. pmid:22506599.
- 23. Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Tabata S. Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 1999; 6: 283–290. pmid:10574454.
- 24. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20: 3252–3255. pmid:15180927.
- 25. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 955–964. pmid:9023104.
- 26. Lowe TM, Chan PP. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: W54–W57. pmid:27174935.
- 27. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 3100–3108. pmid:17452365.
- 28. Lohse M, Drechsel O, Kahlau S, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW—a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: W575–W581. pmid:23609545.
- 29. Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney RK, Graner A. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 106: 411–422. pmid:12589540.
- 30. Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 4633–4642. pmid:11713313.
- 31. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30: 772–780. pmid:23329690.
- 32. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28: 1647–1649. pmid:22543367.
- 33. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017; 34: 3299–3302. pmid:29029172.
- 34. Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon Adaptation Index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987; 15: 1281–1295. pmid:3547335.
- 35. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004; 14: 1394–1403. pmid:15231754.
- 36. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: W273–W279. pmid:15215394.
- 37. Alzohairy AM. BioEdit: An important software for molecular biology. GERF Bulletin of Biosciences. 2011; 2: 60–61.
- 38. Chen CJ, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He YH, et al. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Molecular plant. 2020; 13: 1194–1202. pmid:32585190.
- 39. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018; 35: 1547–1549. pmid:29722887.
- 40. Mattick JS, Gagen MJ. The evolution of controlled multitasked gene networks: the role of introns and other noncoding RNAs in the development of complex organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 2001; 18: 1611–1630. pmid:11504843.
- 41. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Gielly L, Miquel C, Valentini A, et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: e14. pmid:17169982.
- 42. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Palmer JD. Multiple Independent Losses of Two Genes and One Intron from Legume Chloroplast Genomes. Syst Bot. 1995; 20: 272–294.
- 43. Timme RE, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. A comparative analysis of the Lactuca and Helianthus (Asteraceae) plastid genomes: identification of divergent regions and categorization of shared repeats. Am J Bot. 2007; 94: 302–312. pmid:21636403.
- 44. Grassi F, Labra M, Scienza A, Imazio S. Chloroplast SSR markers to assess DNA diversity in wild and cultivated grapevines. Vitis. 2002; 41: 157–158.
- 45. Gu CH, Tembrock LR, Zheng SY, Wu ZQ. The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Catha edulis: A Comparative Analysis of Genome Features with Related Species. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 525. pmid:29425128.
- 46. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27: 573–580. pmid:9862982.
- 47. Staden R, McLachlan AD. Codon preference and its use in identifying protein coding regions in long DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982; 10: 141–156. pmid:7063399.
- 48. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc. 2003; 141: 399–436.
- 49. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 2009; 161: 105–121.
- 50. Zhu AD, Guo WH, Gupta S, Fan WS, Mower JP. Evolutionary dynamics of the plastid inverted repeat: the effects of expansion, contraction, and loss on substitution rates. New Phytol. 2016; 209: 1747–1756. pmid:26574731.
- 51. Huang JL, Sun GL, Zhang DM. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the angiosperm ycf2 gene. J Syst Evol. 2010; 48: 240–248.
- 52. Dugas DV, Hernandez D, Koenen EJM, Schwarz E, Straub S, Hughes CE, et al. Mimosoid legume plastome evolution: IR expansion, tandem repeat expansions, and accelerated rate of evolution in clpP. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 16958. pmid:26592928.
- 53. Li Y, Zhou JG, Chen XL, Cui YX, Xu ZC, Li YH, et al. Gene losses and partial deletion of small single-copy regions of the chloroplast genomes of two hemiparasitic Taxillus species. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 12834. pmid:29026168.
- 54. Wolfe KH, Morden CW, Palmer JD. Function and evolution of a minimal plastid genome from a nonphotosynthetic parasitic plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89: 10648–10652. pmid:1332054.
- 55. Park I, Song JH, Yang S, Kim WJ, Choi G, Moon BC. Cuscuta Species Identification Based on the Morphology of Reproductive Organs and Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20. pmid:31163646.
- 56. McCoy SR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Raubeson LA. The complete plastid genome sequence of Welwitschia mirabilis: an unusually compact plastome with accelerated divergence rates. BMC Evol Biol. 2008; 8: 130. pmid:18452621.
- 57. Braukmann TWA, Kuzmina M, Stefanović S. Loss of all plastid ndh genes in Gnetales and conifers: extent and evolutionary significance for the seed plant phylogeny. Curr Genet. 2009; 55: 323–337. pmid:19449185.
- 58. Lei WJ, Ni DP, Wang YJ, Shao JJ, Wang XC, Yang D, et al. Intraspecific and heteroplasmic variations, gene losses and inversions in the chloroplast genome of Astragalus membranaceus. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 21669. pmid:26899134.
- 59. Kunnimalaiyaan M, Nielsen BL. Fine mapping of replication origins (oriA and oriB) in Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 3681–3686. pmid:9278490.
- 60. Abdullah Henriquez CL, Mehmood F, Carlsen MM, Islam M, Waheed MT, et al. Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Anthurium huixtlense and Pothos scandens (Pothoideae, Araceae): Unique Inverted Repeat Expansion and Contraction Affect Rate of Evolution. J Mol Evol. 2020; 88: 562–574. pmid:32642873.
- 61. Blazier JC, Guisinger MM, Jansen RK. Recent loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Mol Biol. 2011; 76: 263–272. pmid:21327834.
- 62. Ruhlman TA, Chang WJ, Chen JJW, Huang YT, Chan MT, Zhang J, et al. NDH expression marks major transitions in plant evolution and reveals coordinate intracellular gene loss. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 100. pmid:25886915.
- 63. Dong WL, Wang RN, Zhang NY, Fan WB, Fang MF, Li ZH. Molecular Evolution of Chloroplast Genomes of Orchid Species: Insights into Phylogenetic Relationship and Adaptive Evolution. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 716. pmid:29498674.
- 64. Wu CS, Lai YT, Lin CP, Wang YN, Chaw SM. Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009; 52: 115–124. pmid:19166950.
- 65. Wang XQ, Tank DC, Sang T. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17: 773–781. pmid:10779538.
- 66. Weng ML, Blazier JC, Govindu M, Jansen RK. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31: 645–659. pmid:24336877.
- 67. Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Hedges SB. TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times. Mol Biol Evol. 2017; 34: 1812–1819. pmid:28387841.
- 68. Abdullah , Mehmood F, Shahzadi I, Ali Z, Islam M, Naeem M, et al. Correlations among oligonucleotide repeats, nucleotide substitutions, and insertion–deletion mutations in chloroplast genomes of plant family Malvaceae. J Syst Evol. 2021; 59: 388–402.
- 69. Abdullah , Mehmood F, Rahim A, Heidari P, Ahmed I, Poczai P. Comparative plastome analysis of Blumea, with implications for genome evolution and phylogeny of Asteroideae. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11: 7810–7826. pmid:34188853.