http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-4128
Figures
Abstract
Suicide is a major public health concern worldwide. This study aimed to predict the suicidal behavior of Chinese university students by studying psychological measures such as hopelessness, orientation to happiness, meaning in life, depression, anxiety, stress, and coping styles. In November 2016, a stratified-clustered-random sampling approach was utilized to select subjects from two large public medical-related universities in Shandong province, China. This sample consisted of 2,074 undergraduate students (706 males, 1,368 females; mean age = 19.79±1.39 years). The students’ major risk factors for suicide were depression, anxiety, stress, and hopelessness, and the students’ minor risk factors included orientation to happiness and coping styles (including self-distraction, self-blame and substance use). Notably, the presence of meaning in life had a positive effect on preventing suicide and acted as a protective factor, which suggests that it is important to identify risk factors as well as protective factors relevant to the target population group in order to increase the effectiveness of counseling and suicide prevention programs.
Citation: Lew B, Huen J, Yu P, Yuan L, Wang D-F, Ping F, et al. (2019) Associations between depression, anxiety, stress, hopelessness, subjective well-being, coping styles and suicide in Chinese university students. PLoS ONE 14(7): e0217372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217372
Editor: Marco Innamorati, Universita degli Studi Europea di Roma, ITALY
Received: March 19, 2019; Accepted: May 9, 2019; Published: July 1, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Lew et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Shandong University International Collaboration Project “Religion and suicidal behavior” (21320005281601) to Prof. Jia Cun-Xian.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Globally, suicide has been recognized as a severe public health concern associated with significant disability, psychosocial impairment, and medical illness. Approximately 800,000 people take their own lives each year [1]. Furthermore, suicide rates among adolescents and young adults, especially on university campuses, have been increasing at an alarming rate [2]. Significant precursors to dying by suicide are nonlethal suicidal behaviors—such as suicide ideation and suicide attempts [3–5]. A report from the USA in 2014 claimed that an estimated 108,000 full-time college students had attempted suicide [6]. Statistics show the prevalence of suicide ideation or suicide plans among college students to range between 5.4–38% worldwide [7–11]. In China, suicide is the leading cause of death for young adults [12]. The suicide rate in China has been decreasing but remains the second leading cause of death for this age group [13].
University students constitute a unique group due to their relatively high intelligence, aspirations and self-esteem. However, they are in a developmental period, transitioning from adolescence to adulthood, and they must adapt to new living conditions as well as new social and academic challenges [14]. Many of them develop mental disorders, some of which are serious [15, 16]. When confronted with adverse life events, a tense campus climate and psychological stress can exacerbate the stress response, and extreme reactions such as suicidal behaviors are likely to occur [17].
Previous studies have revealed that an increased risk of suicidal behavior in university students is correlated with several identifiable factors, such as personality traits, substance abuse, negative life events (such as academic difficulties) [18], social disconnectedness (poor interpersonal networks) [19], conflict in their families [20, 21] and medical illness, which can include mental disorders or physical disorders (such as a stroke) [22]. In a systematic review investigating the relationship between suicide and stroke, stroke as a medical disorder was identified as a significant risk factor for suicidality (including both suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior), especially among depressed patients [22]. The existence of previous mood disorders, a prior history of stroke, and cognitive impairment were found to be important risk factors for suicide [22]. In other studies with undergraduate students, a population group that normally has fewer physical health problems, variables such as hopelessness [23, 24], anxiety [25], and depression [6, 26] appear to be the more important risk factors. Subjective well-being factors, such as those related to meaning in life [27] and limited coping abilities [28, 29], are also potential predictors of suicidality.
The present study was designed to explore the association between a number of psychological factors and suicidal behaviors among university students in China, which could inform prevention strategies by better understanding the key risk factors and protective factors that are relevant to university students. Specifically, the main study purpose was to examine whether risk factors including hopelessness, depression, anxiety, stress, coping styles, and protective factors (including orientation to happiness, meaning in life) were significantly associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in our sample group.
Methods and material
Subjects and procedure
This study was conducted in November 2016 in Jinan, the capital city of Shandong province, China. Shandong province lies to the south of Beijing and has approximately 100 million residents, of whom there are approximately 7.23 million people living in Jinan [30]. Two large public medical-related universities in Jinan were selected, and two large faculty colleges from each university were sampled for this study. A stratified-clustered-random sampling approach was then undertaken to choose participants from three or four classes in each grade (i.e., freshman, sophomore, junior and senior levels). All students in the sampled classes were invited to complete the self-report questionnaires. It took each respondent approximately 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire during class breaks. The study was approved by the institutional review boards and by the Ethics Committee at Shandong University School of Public Health.
Of the 2,197 questionnaires distributed, 2,074 responses were received from undergraduate students, resulting in a response rate of 94.4%. Among the respondents, 706 were males (mean age = 19.86, SD = 1.50 years) and 1,368 were females (mean age = 19.75, SD = 1.33 years). In China, females are the dominant participants in higher education, and it is therefore common for the proportion of female students in universities to exceed that of male students. The mean age of all respondents was 19.79 (SD = 1.39 years). The sample consisted of 574 (27.7%) freshmen, 521 (25.1%) sophomores, 619 (29.8%) juniors, and 360 (17.4%) seniors. Regarding ethnicity demographics, 1,939 (93.5%) were Han Chinese and 135 (6.5%) were from ethnic minorities.
Measures
The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) comprises four items, each assessing a different suicidal behavior: lifetime suicide ideation and suicide attempts; frequency of suicide ideation over the past twelve months; threats of suicide attempt; and likelihood of suicidal behavior in the future [31]. The total score, ranging from 3 to 18, could be used to evaluate the suicide risk for undergraduate students [32]. The Chinese version of the SBQ-R was translated by our research team. In this study, the Cronbach alpha value of the SBQ-R was 0.67.
The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) is a 20-item instrument measuring one’s negative attitudes about the future [33]. It was modified from yes/no to a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) in a study with Chinese respondents [34]. The Chinese version of the BHS had satisfactory reliability and validity in adolescents [35], similar to the findings of this study (α = 0.90) based on the 5-point Likert scale.
The Orientation to Happiness Questionnaire (OTH) has 12 items that evaluate two different strategies for pursuing happiness (6 items per strategy): a life of pleasure (e.g., “In choosing what to do, I always take into account whether it will be pleasurable.”) and a life of meaning (e.g., “My life serves a higher purpose.”) [36]. Using the Chinese version of the OTH, responses were given on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very much unlike me) through 5 (very much like me), and higher subscale scores demonstrate a stronger endorsement of the corresponding orientation [37]. The Cronbach alpha value of the OTH was 0.84.
Meaning in life was measured by the Chinese version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ) [38]. It is made up of two five-item subscales [39]: the presence of meaning in life (MLQ-P) and a search for meaning in life (MLQ-S). All ten items are rated from 1 (absolutely untrue) to 7 (absolutely true). The item scores are then summed, and higher scores indicate a stronger correspondence to meaning in life [40]. In this study, the Cronbach alpha value of the MLQ was 0.88 (0.78 and 0.88 for the MLQ-P and MLQ-S respectively), showing satisfactory internal consistency.
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) [41] is a 42-item questionnaire including three subscales to measure three different negative emotional states, namely, depression, anxiety and stress. A revised version of the DASS, the DASS-21, was used in this study; it has seven items for each subscale and has been widely used for the identification and assessment of the corresponding emotional symptoms [42–44]. The score range for each item varies from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or most of the time). A lower score reflects better mental health. Studies have shown the DASS-21 to be a reliable and valid inventory and suitable for studies in Chinese college students [45]. In this study, the Cronbach alpha values of the DASS were 0.84, 0.82, and 0.79 for the depression, stress and anxiety subscales, respectively.
The Brief COPE Scale (BCS) is a multidimensional scale [46], presenting 14 subscales, each with two items measuring a strategy that one would take under some certain kind of stressor. The fourteen coping strategies included in the Brief COPE are self-distraction, active coping, denial, use of instrumental support, substance use, use of emotional support, positive reframing, behavioral disengagement, venting, planning, humor, acceptance, religion, and self-blame. It has been translated into various languages and used in different countries [47, 48]. In this study, an eleven-factor model [47] was adopted to measure situational and dispositional coping responses.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0 (IBM corp., and Armonk, New York, US). Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the reliability of scales.
Multiple linear regression with stepwise selection method was used to explore significant predictors of suicidal behaviors. Age, gender, and all psychological variables, including hopelessness, depression, anxiety, stress, coping styles, orientation to happiness, and meaning in life were simultaneously entered into the multiple regression model to predict suicidal behaviors with those weak predictors being removed stepwise to result in a final model containing all significant predictors. Furthermore, the variance inflation factor (VIF) and tolerance were calculated to determine the presence of multicollinearity.
All relevant data are in Supporting Information.
Results
The mean scores and standard deviations for each of the scales are shown in Table 1, along with Cronbach’s alphas for each scale. The high Cronbach’s alphas indicated satisfactory reliability for the instruments.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217372.t001
The scale scores were subjected to multiple regression, which shows the significant components for the prediction of SBQ. Collinearity diagnosis showed a satisfactory variance inflation factor (VIF<5) and tolerance in multiple regression. The strongest predictors of suicidal behavior were hopelessness, depression, stress and some coping styles like self-distraction and self-blame (see Table 2). As a protective factor, the presence of meaning in life showed the potential to prevent suicide. This was also consistent with the Pearson correlations, the highest of which were associated with hopelessness, depression and stress. Moreover, we found that age and gender were statistically significant for regression beta, but orientation to happiness had few contributions to suicidality.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217372.t002
Discussion
The main findings of the present study were the following: the major risk factors for suicidal behavior were shown to be hopelessness, depression, stress and negative coping styles; furthermore, perceiving meaning in life was shown to be a protective factor for suicidal behavior.
The linear regression indicated that hopelessness, depression, stress and the presence of meaning in life were significant predictors of suicidal behavior. It has been well documented in suicidology literature that the greater the severity of depression and the higher the levels of hopelessness and stress, the greater is the likelihood of suicidal behavior in college students [26, 49–52]. In Furr’s research [53], approximately 53% of students stated that they had experienced depressive symptoms since entering into college, increasing the likelihood of suicidal ideation or behaviors. Lester [26] found that undergraduate students living on campus were more depressed than those living with parents or off campus. In the present study, the Depression subscale assessed dysphoria, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia, and inertia. Consistent with most previous studies [52, 54], depression was a predictive factor for suicidal behavior among Chinese university students.
Hopelessness has been shown to be a risk factor for suicidal behavior, both nonlethal and lethal behavior types [23, 24, 55]. Individuals experiencing hopelessness have a pessimistic attitude about the future and react poorly to stressors, and hopelessness acts as a mediator between psychological distress and suicidal behaviors [56, 57].
Another well-documented predictor of suicidal behavior in university students is stress [26, 58]. University students face a barrage of stress through homework, projects and internships and thus have little time to join extracurricular activities for relaxation. They also must adjust to new living arrangements, many of which involve being away from home.
This present study found that having meaning in life was a protective factor for suicidal behavior, which was consistent with previous research [27, 59]. Having meaning in life may be defined as the pursuit and accomplishment of worthwhile goals and the accompanying satisfaction [60]. A sense of meaning contributes to the foundation of overall happiness and predicts positive traits and psychological strengths associated with fulfillment in life [61]. People without meaning in life tend to experience emptiness and have less motivation to continue to live [62, 63]. Thus, it is important to guide students to establish clear and reasonable life goals, to face and accept frustrations and setbacks in life, to release negative emotions and to optimize meaningful life situations [40] in order to lower the likelihood of future suicide.
Previous research has shown that negative coping styles were associated with suicidal behavior [29, 64]. Only some coping skills were found to have a weak relationship with suicidal behavior, and one reason for that finding may be poorly validated measures of coping skills. Furthermore, students with a high suicide risk tended to adopt passive coping skills when facing difficulties due to the lack of proper coping mechanisms to transfer their emotions.
The findings of the present study, based on the availability of useful measures to assess suicidal risk in university students in China, suggest that suicidal behaviors are significantly associated with several risk and protective factors. The data highlight the need to provide effective psychological outreach programs and suicide prevention measures and interventions for this population, taking into consideration the risk factors and protective factors of this age group. University students, young adults who have recently enrolled in institutions of higher education, might not yet have developed a mature perspective on life and death or have stable outlooks on suicide [27]. These programs and interventions should be conducted as soon as the students commence undergraduate programs and should be implemented on campus to reach more university students. In designing these preventive programs and interventions, it is important to screen students for risks and protective factors; to design good counseling techniques and content to address the multifacet sources that can increase risk factors; and to identify if an individual student possesses certain protective factor(s) so he or she can be placed in psychotherapy or counseling. For example, counseling and guidance for university students could draw on important protective factors, namely, meaning in life, to prevent suicidal behavior.
There are some limitations to this study. First, a cross-sectional study is insufficient to draw firm conclusions on causality, which is better studied using a longitudinal design that follows a cohort of individuals. Second, the samples were recruited from a limited region, and most of the selected subjects were medical students. Therefore, the results may not be representative of all university students. Third, there may have been potential biases associated with unmeasured confounding variables.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful for all the teachers and staff from Shandong University School of Public Health and Medicine and Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine for providing logistic support as well as the participants for this study.
References
- 1.
World Health Organization. Suicide data. World Health Organization. 2019; Available from: https://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/.
- 2. Bridge JA, Goldstein TR, Brent DA. Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006; 47(3–4): 372–394. pmid:16492264
- 3. Spirito A, Esposito-Smythers C. Attempted and completed suicide in adolescence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006; 2(1): 237–266.
- 4. Nock MK, Green JG, Hwang I, McLaughlin KA, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013; 70(3): 300–310. pmid:23303463
- 5. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Borges G, Nock M, Wang PS. Trends in suicide ideation, plans, gestures, and attempts in the United States, 1990–1992 to 2001–2003. JAMA. 2005; 293(20): 2487–2495. pmid:15914749
- 6. Lamis DA, Ballard ED, May AM, Dvorak RD. Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation in College Students: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Hopelessness, Alcohol Problems, and Social Support. J Clin Psychol. 2016; 72(9): 919–932. pmid:27008096
- 7. Lee K, Lee HK, Kim SH. Temperament and character profile of college students who have suicidal ideas or have attempted suicide. J Affect Disord. 2017; 221: 198–204. pmid:28647670
- 8. Wilcox HC, Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, Pinchevsky GM, O'Grady KE. Prevalence and predictors of persistent suicide ideation, plans, and attempts during college. J Affect Disord. 2010; 127(1–3): 287–294. pmid:20471691
- 9. Drum DJ, Brownson C, Burton Denmark, A, Smith SE. New data on the nature of suicidal crises in college students: Shifting the paradigm. Prof Psychol-Res Pr. 2009; 40(3): 213–222.
- 10. Toprak S, Cetin I, Guven T, Can G, Demircan C. Self-harm, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among college students. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 187(1–2): 140–144. pmid:21040980
- 11. Mackenzie S, Wiegel JR, Mundt M, Brown D, Saewyc E, Heiligenstein E, et al. Depression and suicide ideation among students accessing campus health care. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011; 81(1): 101–107. pmid:21219281
- 12. Phillips MR, Yang G, Zhang Y, Wang L, Ji H, Zhou M. Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case-control psychological autopsy study. Lancet. 2002; 360(9347): 1728–1736. pmid:12480425
- 13. Zhang J, Sun L, Liu Y, Zhang J. The Change in Suicide Rates between 2002 and 2011 in China. Suicide life threat behav. 2014; 44(5): 560–8. pmid:24690079
- 14. Parker JDA, Summerfeldt LJ, Hogan MJ, Majeski SA. Emotional intelligence and academic success: examining the transition from high school to university. Pers Indiv Differ. 2004; 36(1): 163–172.
- 15. Byrd DR, McKinney KJ. Individual, interpersonal, and institutional level factors associated with the mental health of college students. J Am Coll Health. 2012; 60(3): 185–93. pmid:22420695
- 16. Cleary M, Walter G, Jackson D. "Not always smooth sailing": mental health issues associated with the transition from high school to college. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2011; 32(4): 250–4. pmid:21355760
- 17. Eskin M, Kujan O, Voracek M, Shaheen A, Carta MG, Sun JM, et al. Cross-national comparisons of attitudes towards suicide and suicidal persons in university students from 12 countries. Scand J Psychol. 2016; 57(6): 554–563. pmid:27538761
- 18. Arria AM, O'Grady KE, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, Wilcox HC, Wish ED. Suicide ideation among college students: a multivariate analysis. Arch Suicide Res. 2009; 13(3): 230–246. pmid:19590997
- 19. Van Orden KA, Witte TK, James LM, Castro Y, Gordon KH, Braithwaite SR, et al. Suicidal ideation in college students varies across semesters: the mediating role of belongingness. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2008; 38(4): 427–435. pmid:18724790
- 20. Saffer BY, Glenn CR, David Klonsky E. Clarifying the Relationship of Parental Bonding to Suicide Ideation and Attempts. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015; 45(4): 518–528. pmid:25530006
- 21. Zhao S, Zhang J. Suicide risks among adolescents and young adults in rural China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 12(1): 131–145. pmid:25546276
- 22. Pompili M, Venturini P, Lamis DA, Giordano G, Serafini G Murri MB et al. Suicide in stroke survivors: Epidemioogy and Prevention. Drugs Aging. 2015; 32:21–29. pmid:25491561
- 23. Kovacs M, Beck AT, Weissman A. Hopelessness: an indicator of suicidal risk. Suicide. 1975; 5(2): 98–103. pmid:1224378
- 24. Chang EC. Hope and hopelessness as predictors of suicide ideation in Hungarian college students. Death Stud. 2017; 41(7):455–460. pmid:28346075
- 25. Hill RM, Castellanos D, Pettit JW. Suicide-related behaviors and anxiety in children and adolescents: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011; 31(7): 1133–1144. pmid:21851804
- 26. Lester D. College student stressors, depression, and suicidal ideation. Psychol Rep. 2014; 114(1): 293–296. pmid:24765726
- 27. Xie X, Zou B, Huang Z. Relationships between suicide attitudes and perception of life purpose and meaning of life in college students. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012; 32(10): 1482–1485. pmid:23076190
- 28. Li Z, Zhang J. Coping skills, mental disorders, and suicide among rural youths in China. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012; 200(10): 885–90. pmid:22986278
- 29. Sun L, Zhang J. Coping skill as a moderator between negative life events and suicide among young people in rural China. J Clin Psychol. 2015; 71(3): 258–266. pmid:25534274
- 30.
Shandong Provincial Bureau of Statistics. 2017 Shandong Statistics Year Book. 2017; Available from: http://www.stats-sd.gov.cn/tjnj/nj2017/indexch.htm.
- 31. Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, Konick LC, Kopper BA, Barrios FX. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment. 2001; 8(4): 443–454. pmid:11785588
- 32. Alobaa O, Ojeleyeb O, Aloba T. The psychometric characteristics of the 4-item Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) as a screening tool in a non-clinical sample of Nigerian university students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017; 26: 46–51. pmid:28483090
- 33. Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974; 42(6): 861–865. pmid:4436473
- 34. Zhang WC, Jia CX, Hu X, Qiu HM, Liu XC. Beck Hopelessness Scale: Psychometric Properties Among Rural Chinese Suicide Attempters and Non-Attempters. Death Stud. 2015; 39(7): 442–446. pmid:25679324
- 35. Kong Y. Reliability and validity of the Beck hopelessness scale for adolescent. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2007; 21(10): 686–689.
- 36. Peterson C, Park N, Seligman MEP. Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life. J Happiness Stud. 2005; 6(1): 25–41.
- 37. Yang Y, Li P, Kou Y. Orientations to Happiness and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Adolescents. Child Indic Res. 2016;10(4): 881–897.
- 38. Liu SS, Gan YQ. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2010; 24(6):478–482.
- 39. Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol. 2006; 53(1): 80–93.
- 40. Doğan T, Sapmaz F, Tel FD, Sapmaz S, Temizel S. Meaning in life and subjective well-being among Turkish university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012; 55(55), 612–617.
- 41.
Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (2nd edition). Psychology Foundation; 1995.
- 42. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2011; 44(2): 227–239.
- 43. Osman A, Wong JL, Bagge CL, Freedenthal S, Gutierrez PM, Lozano G. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. J Clin Psychol. 2012; 68(12): 1322–1338. pmid:22930477
- 44. Szabó M. The short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Factor structure in a young adolescent sample. J Adolesc. 2010; 33(1): 1–8. pmid:19560196
- 45. Gong X, Xie XY, Xu R, Luo YJ. Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Versions of DASS-21 in Chinese College Students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2010; 18(4): 443–446.
- 46. Carver CS, You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1): 92–100. pmid:16250744
- 47. Tang KNS, Chan CS, Ng J, Yip CH. Action Type-Based Factorial Structure of Brief COPE among Hong Kong Chinese. J Psychopathol Behav. 2016; 38(4): 1–14.
- 48. Baumstarck K, Alessandrini M, Hamidou Z, Auquier P, Leroy T, Boyer L. Assessment of coping: a new french four-factor structure of the brief cope inventory. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15(1): 8. pmid:28077139
- 49. Evans E, Hawton K, Rodham K. Factors associated with suicidal phenomena in adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004; 24(8): 957–979. pmid:15533280
- 50. Konick LC, Gutierrez PM. Testing a model of suicide ideation in college students. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2005; 35(2): 181–192. pmid:15843335
- 51. Farabaugh A, Bitran S, Nyer M, Holt DJ, Pedrelli P, Shyu I. Depression and suicidal ideation in college students. Psychopathology. 2012; 45(4): 228–234. pmid:22627683
- 52. Bauer RL, Chesin MS, Jeglic EL. Depression, delinquency, and suicidal behaviors among college students. Crisis. 2014; 35(1): 36–41. pmid:24067247
- 53. Furr SR, Westefeld JS, McConnell GN, Jenkins JM. Suicide and depression among college students: A decade later. Prof Psychol-Res Pr. 2001; 32(1): 97–100.
- 54. Garlow SJ, Rosenberg J, Moore JD, Haas AP, Koestner B, Hendin H. Depression, desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: results from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention College Screening Project at Emory University. Depress Anxiety. 2008; 25(6): 482–488. pmid:17559087
- 55. Lester D. Hopelessness in undergraduate students around the world: A review. J Affect Disord. 2013; 150(3): 1204–1208. pmid:23764384
- 56. Miranda R, Valderrama J, Tsypes A, Gadol E, Gallagher M. Cognitive inflexibility and suicidal ideation: mediating role of brooding and hopelessness. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 210(1): 174–181. pmid:23528518
- 57. Woosley JA, Lichstein KL, Taylor DJ, Riedel BW, Bush AJ. Hopelessness mediates the relation between insomnia and suicidal ideation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014; 10(11): 1223–1230. pmid:25325598
- 58. Dixon WA, Heppner PP, Anderson WP. Problem-solving appraisal, stress, hopelessness, and suicide ideation in a college population. J Couns Psychol. 1991; 38(1): 51–56.
- 59. Edwards MJ, Holden RR. Coping, meaning in life, and suicidal manifestations: Examining gender differences. J Clin Psychol. 2001; 57(12): 1517–1534. pmid:11745593
- 60. Ho MY, Cheung FM, Cheung SF. The role of meaning in life and optimism in promoting well-being. Pers Individ Dif. 2010; 48(5): 658–663.
- 61. Lent RW. Toward a Unifying Theoretical and Practical Perspective on Well-Being and Psychosocial Adjustment. J Couns Psychol. 2004; 51(4): 482–509.
- 62. Krause N. Meaning in Life and Mortality. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009; 64(4): 517–527. pmid:19515991
- 63. Murray S. Man's search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Pocket Books. 1992; 67(September): 671–677.
- 64. Zhang X, Wang H, Xia Y, Liu X, Jung E. Stress, coping and suicide ideation in Chinese college students. J Adolesc. 2012; 35(3): 683–690. pmid:22032975