• Editors' Suggestion

Fortifying gravitational-wave tests of general relativity against astrophysical assumptions

Ethan Payne, Maximiliano Isi, Katerina Chatziioannou, and Will M. Farr
Phys. Rev. D 108, 124060 – Published 20 December 2023

Abstract

Most tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave observations rely on inferring the degree to which a signal deviates from general relativity in conjunction with the astrophysical parameters of its source, such as the component masses and spins of a compact binary. Due to features of the signal, measurements of these deviations are often highly correlated with the properties of astrophysical sources. As a consequence, prior assumptions about astrophysical parameters will generally affect the inferred magnitude of the deviations. Incorporating information about the underlying astrophysical population is necessary to avoid biases in the inference of deviations from general relativity. Current tests assume that the astrophysical population follows an unrealistic fiducial prior chosen to ease sampling of the posterior—for example, a prior flat in component masses—which is inconsistent with both astrophysical expectations and the distribution inferred from observations. We propose a framework for fortifying tests of general relativity by simultaneously inferring the astrophysical population using a catalog of detections. Although this method applies broadly, we demonstrate it concretely on massive graviton constraints and parametrized tests of deviations to the post-Newtonian phase coefficients. Using observations from LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s third observing run, we show that concurrent inference of the astrophysical distribution strengthens constraints and improves overall consistency with general relativity. We provide updated constraints on deviations from the theory, finding that, upon modeling the astrophysical population, the 90%-credible upper limit on the mass of the graviton improves by 25% to mg9.6×1024eV/c2 and the inferred population-level post-Newtonian deviations move 0.4σ closer to zero.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 8 September 2023
  • Accepted 1 November 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124060

© 2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Ethan Payne1,2,*, Maximiliano Isi3,†, Katerina Chatziioannou1,2,‡, and Will M. Farr3,4,§

  • 1Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 2LIGO Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 3Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Avenue, New York, New York 10010, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 12 — 15 December 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×