Wildland fire emission factors in North America: synthesis of existing data, measurement needs and management applications
Susan J. Prichard A E , Susan M. O’Neill B , Paige Eagle A , Anne G. Andreu A , Brian Drye A , Joel Dubowy A , Shawn Urbanski C and Tara M. Strand D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100, USA.
B Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 400 N. 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
C Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, 5775 W Broadway Street, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.
D Scion Research, Te Papa Tipu Innovation Park, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua 3010, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand.
E Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
International Journal of Wildland Fire 29(2) 132-147 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19066
Submitted: 24 April 2019 Accepted: 26 October 2019 Published: 7 January 2020
Journal Compilation © IAWF 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Field and laboratory emission factors (EFs) of wildland fire emissions for 276 known air pollutants sampled across Canada and the US were compiled. An online database, the Smoke Emissions Repository Application (SERA), was created to enable analysis and summaries of existing EFs to be used in smoke management and emissions inventories. We evaluated how EFs of select pollutants (CO, CO2, CH4, NOx, total particulate matter (PM), PM2.5 and SO2) are influenced by combustion phase, burn type and fuel type. Of the 12 533 records in the database, over a third (n = 5637) are represented by 23 air pollutants, most designated as US Environmental Protection Agency criteria air pollutants, greenhouse gases, hazardous air pollutants or known air toxins. Among all pollutants in the database, including the most common pollutants PM, CO, CO2 and CH4, records are unevenly distributed with a bias towards flaming combustion, prescribed burning and laboratory measurements. Across all EFs, records are most common for south-eastern and western conifer forests and western shrubland types. Based on identified data gaps, we offer recommendations for future studies, including targeting underrepresented air pollutants, smouldering combustion phases and improved source characterisation of wildland fire emissions.
Additional keywords: air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, particulate matter, prescribed fire emissions, smoke management, wildfire emissions.
References
Akagi SK, Yokelson RJ, Wiedinmyer C, Alvarado MJ, Reid JS, Karl T, Crounse JD, Wennberg PO (2011) Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11, 4039–4072.| Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Albini FA, Reinhardt ED (1997) Improved calibration of a large fuel burnout model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 7, 21–28.
| Improved calibration of a large fuel burnout model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andreae MO, Merlet P (2001) Emissions of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15, 955–966.
| Emissions of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aurell J, Gullett BK (2013) Emission factors from aerial and ground measurements of field and laboratory forest burns in the southeastern U.S.: PM2.5, black and brown carbon, VOC, and PCDD/PCDF. Environmental Science & Technology 47, 8443–8452.
| Emission factors from aerial and ground measurements of field and laboratory forest burns in the southeastern U.S.: PM2.5, black and brown carbon, VOC, and PCDD/PCDF.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aurell J, Gullett BK, Tabor D (2015) Emissions from southeastern U.S. grasslands and pine savannas: comparison of aerial and ground field measurements with laboratory burns. Atmospheric Environment 111, 170–178.
| Emissions from southeastern U.S. grasslands and pine savannas: comparison of aerial and ground field measurements with laboratory burns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chen LWA, Verburg P, Shackelford A, Zhu D, Susfalk R, Chow JC, Watson JG (2010) Moisture effects on carbon and nitrogen emission from burning of wildland biomass. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 6617–6625.
| Moisture effects on carbon and nitrogen emission from burning of wildland biomass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Drury SA, Larkin N, Strand TT, Huang S, Strenfel SJ, Banwell EN, O’Brien TE, Raffuse SM (2014) Intercomparison of fire size, fuels, fuel consumption, and smoke emissions estimates in the 2006 Tripod Fire, Washington, USA. Fire Ecology 10, 56–83.
| Intercomparison of fire size, fuels, fuel consumption, and smoke emissions estimates in the 2006 Tripod Fire, Washington, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garcia-Menendez F, Hu Y, Odman MT (2013) Simulating smoke transport from wildland fires with a regional-scale air quality model: sensitivity to uncertain wind fields. Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres 118, 6493–6504.
| Simulating smoke transport from wildland fires with a regional-scale air quality model: sensitivity to uncertain wind fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilman JB, Lerner BM, Kuster WC, Goldan PD, Warneke C, Veres PR, Roberts JM, de Gouw JA, Burling IR, Yokelson RJ (2015) Biomass burning emissions and potential air quality impacts of volatile organic compounds and other trace gases from fuels common in the US. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15, 13915–13938.
| Biomass burning emissions and potential air quality impacts of volatile organic compounds and other trace gases from fuels common in the US.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grandesso E, Gullet B, Touati A, Tabor D (2011) Effect of moisture, charge size, and chlorine concentration on PCDD/F emissions from simulated open burning of forest biomass. Environmental Science & Technology 45, 3887–3894.
| Effect of moisture, charge size, and chlorine concentration on PCDD/F emissions from simulated open burning of forest biomass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hardy CC, Ward DE, Einfield W (1992) PM2.5 emissions from a major wildfire using a GIS: rectification of airborne measurements. In ‘Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the PNW International Section, Air and Waste Management Association’, 11–13 November 1992, Bellevue, WA. Air and Waste Management Association. (Pittsburgh, PA)
Hardy CC, Conard SG, Regelbrugge JC, Teesdale DT (1996) Smoke emissions from prescribed burning of southern California chaparral. US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-RP-486. (Portland, OR)
Hardy CC, Ottmar RD, Peterson JL, Core JE, Seamon P (2001) ‘Smoke management guide for prescribed and wildland fire’, 2001 edn. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Fire Use Working Team, NFES 1279. (Boise, ID)
Hegg DA, Radke LF, Hobbs PV, Rasmussen RA, Riggan PJ (1990) Emissions of some trace gases from biomass fires. Geophysical Research 95, 5669–5675.
Hu Y, Fernandez-Anez N, Smith TEL, Rein G (2018) Review of emissions from smouldering peat fires and their contribution to regional haze episodes. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 293–312.
| Review of emissions from smouldering peat fires and their contribution to regional haze episodes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koss AR, Sekimoto K, Gilman JB, Selimovic V, Coggon MM, Zarzana KJ, Yan B, Lerner BM, Brown SS, Jimenez JL, Krechmer J, Roberts JM, Warneke C, Yokelson RJ, de Gouw J (2018) Non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning: identification, quantification, and emission factors from PTR-ToF during the FIREX 2016 laboratory experiment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, 3299–3319.
| Non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning: identification, quantification, and emission factors from PTR-ToF during the FIREX 2016 laboratory experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larkin NK, O’Neill SM, Solomon R, Raffuse S, Strand T, Sullivan DC, Krull C, Rorig M, Peterson J, Ferguson SA (2009) The BlueSky smoke modeling framework. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 906–920.
| The BlueSky smoke modeling framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larkin NK, Strand TM, Drury SA, Raffuse SM, Solomon RC, O’Neill SM, Wheeler N, Huang S, Rorig M, Hafner HR (2012) Phase 1 of the smoke and emissions model intercomparison project (SEMIP): creation of SEMIP and evaluation of current models. Final report to the Joint Fire Science Program, Project #08–1-6–10. (Boise, ID)
Larkin NK, Raffuse SM, Strand TM (2014) Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: U.S. emissions inventories. Forest Ecology and Management 317, 61–69.
| Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: U.S. emissions inventories.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laursen KK, Hobbs PV, Radke LF (1992) Some trace gas emissions from North American biomass fires with an assessment of regional and global fluxes from biomass burning. Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 20687–20701.
| Some trace gas emissions from North American biomass fires with an assessment of regional and global fluxes from biomass burning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lincoln E, Hao W, Weise DR, Johnson TJ (2014) Wildland fire emission factors database. Forest Service Research Data Archive. (Fort Collins, CO) https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2014-0012
Liu X, Huey LG, Yokelson RJ, Selimovic V, Simpson IJ, Müller M, Jimenez JL, Campuzano-Jost P, Beyersdorf AJ, Blake DR, Butterfield Z, Choi Y, Crounse JD, Day DA, Diskin GS, Dubey MK, Fortner E, Hanisco TF, Hu W, King LE, Kleinman L, Meinardi S, Mikoviny T, Onasch TB, Palm BB, Peischl J, Pollack IB, Ryerson TB, Sachse GW, Sedlacek AJ, Shilling JE, Springston S, St Clair JM, Tanner DJ, Teng AP, Wennberg PO, Wisthaler A, Wolfe GA (2017) Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications. Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres 122, 6108–6129.
| Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MACTEC Federal Programs (2004) Emission reduction techniques for agricultural burning and wildland fire: a guide to the final work products. Prepared for the Fire Emissions Joint Forum, Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP). (Durham, NC)
May AA, McMeeking GR, Lee T, Taylor JW, Craven JS, Burling I, Sullivan AP, Akagi S, Collett JL, Flynn M, Coe H, Urbanski SP, Seinfeld JH, Yokelson RJ, Kreidenweis SM (2014) Aerosol emissions from prescribed fires in the United States: a synthesis of laboratory and aircraft measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres 119, 11826–11849.
| Aerosol emissions from prescribed fires in the United States: a synthesis of laboratory and aircraft measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller C, O’Neill SM, Rorig M, Alvarado E (2019) Air quality challenges of prescribed fire in complex terrain and the wildland urban interface surrounding Bend, Oregon. Atmosphere 10, 515
| Air quality challenges of prescribed fire in complex terrain and the wildland urban interface surrounding Bend, Oregon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ottmar RD (2014) Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: modeling fuel consumption. Forest Ecology and Management 317, 41–50.
| Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: modeling fuel consumption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peterson J, Lahm P, Fitch M, George M, Haddow D, Melvin M, Hyde J, Eberhardt E (2018) NWCG Smoke Management Guide for Prescribed Fire, National Wildfire Coordinating Group, PMS 420–2, NFES 001279. (Boise, ID)
Prichard SJ (2007) Consume user’s guide. Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory USDA Forest Service. (Seattle, WA) Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/research/smoke/consume/consume30_users_guide.pdf [accessed 22 April 2019]
Prichard SJ, Kennedy MC, Wright CS, Cronan JB, Ottmar RD (2017) Predicting forest floor and woody fuel consumption from prescribed burns in southern and western pine ecosystems of the United States. Forest Ecology and Management 405, 328–338.
| Predicting forest floor and woody fuel consumption from prescribed burns in southern and western pine ecosystems of the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Radke LF, Lyons DA, Hobbs JH, Hegg PV, Sandberg DV, Ward DE (1990) Airborne monitoring and smoke characterization of prescribed fires in forest lands in Western Washington and Oregon: final report. USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-251. (Portland, OR)
Radke LF, Hegg DA, Hobbs PV, Nance JD, Lyons JH, Laursen KK, Weiss RE, Riggan PJ, Ward DE (1991) Particulate and trace gas emissions from large biomass fires in North America. In ‘Global biomass burning: atmospheric, climatic and biospheric implications’. (Ed. JS Levine) pp. 209–224. (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA)
Reinhardt ED, Keane RE, Brown JK (1997) First order fire effects model: FOFEM. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, GTR-INT-344. (Ogden, UT)
Robertson KM, Hsieh YP, Bugna GC (2014) Fire environment effects on particulate matter emission factors in southeastern US pine-grasslands. Atmospheric Environment 99, 104–111.
| Fire environment effects on particulate matter emission factors in southeastern US pine-grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sekimoto K, Koss AR, Gilman JB, Selimovic V, Coggon MM, Zarzana KJ, Yuan B, Lerner BM, Brown SS, Warneke C, Yokelson RJ, Roberts JM, de Gouw J (2018) High- and low-temperature pyrolysis profiles describe volatile organic compound emissions from western US wildfire fuels. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, 9263–9281.
| High- and low-temperature pyrolysis profiles describe volatile organic compound emissions from western US wildfire fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strand TM, Larkin NK, Craig KJ, Raffuse S, Sullivan D, Solomon R, Rorig M, Wheeler N, Pryden D (2012) Analyses of BlueSky Gateway PM2.5 predictions during the 2007 southern and 2008 northern California fires. Journal of Geophysical Research 117, D17301
| Analyses of BlueSky Gateway PM2.5 predictions during the 2007 southern and 2008 northern California fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Urbanski S (2013) Combustion efficiency and emission factors for wildfire-season fires in mixed conifer forests of the northern Rocky Mountains, US. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, 7241–7262.
| Combustion efficiency and emission factors for wildfire-season fires in mixed conifer forests of the northern Rocky Mountains, US.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Urbanski S (2014) Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: emission factors. Forest Ecology and Management 317, 51–60.
| Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: emission factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
US Environmental Protection Agency (2017). 2017 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Plan. (Washington, DC) Available at https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-national-emissions-inventory-nei-plan [accessed 22 April 2019]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (2018). 2014 National Emissions Inventory, version 2, Technical Support Document. (Research Triangle Park, NC) Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-07/documents/nei2014v2_tsd_05jul2018.pdf [accessed 19 September 2019].
Ward DE, Hardy CC, Sandberg D, Reinhardt T (1989) Mitigation of prescribed fire atmospheric pollution through increased utilization of hardwood, piles residues, and long-needled conifers. Part III: Emissions Characterization. U.S. Department of Energy, Northwest Research Station, Final Report IAG DA-AI179– 85BP18509. (Portland, OR).
Yokelson RJ, Griffith DWT, Ward DE (1996) Open path Fourier transform infrared studies of large-scale laboratory biomass fires. Journal of Geophysical Research 101, 21067–21080.
| Open path Fourier transform infrared studies of large-scale laboratory biomass fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yokelson RJ, Burling IR, Gilman JB, Warneke C, Stockwell CE, de Gouw J, Akagi SK, Urbanski SP, Veres P, Roberts JM, Kuster WC, Reardon J, Griffith DWT, Johnson TJ, Hosseini S, Miller JW, Cocker DR, Jung H, Weise DR (2013) Coupling field and laboratory measurements to estimate the emission factors of identified and identified trace gases for prescribed fires. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, 89–116.
| Coupling field and laboratory measurements to estimate the emission factors of identified and identified trace gases for prescribed fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
