Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering
  3. Article

Model-driven architecture-centric engineering of (embedded) software intensive systems: modeling theories and architectural milestones

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Open access
  • Published: 15 November 2006
  • Volume 3, pages 75–102, (2007)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Model-driven architecture-centric engineering of (embedded) software intensive systems: modeling theories and architectural milestones
Download PDF
  • Manfred Broy1 
  • 1185 Accesses

  • 18 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Today, in general, embedded software is distributed onto networks and structured into logical components that interact asynchronously by exchanging messages. The software system is connected to sensors, actuators, human machine interfaces and networks. In this paper we study fundamental models of composed embedded software systems and their properties, identify and describe various basic views, and show how they are related. We consider, in particular, models of data, states, interfaces, functionality, hierarchically composed systems, and processes. We study relationships by abstraction and refinement as well as forms of composition and modularity. In particular, we introduce a comprehensive mathematical model and a corresponding mathematical theory for composed systems, its essential views and their relationships. We introduce two methodologically essential, complementary and orthogonal concepts for the structured modeling of multifunctional embedded systems in software and systems engineering and their scientific foundation. One approach addresses mainly tasks in requirements engineering and the specification of the comprehensive user functionality of multifunctional systems in terms of their functions, features and services. The other approach essentially addresses the design phase with its task to develop logical architectures formed by networks of interactive components that are specified by their interface behavior.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Software Abstractions and Human-Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture Modelling

Chapter © 2020

Automating integration under emergent constraints for embedded systems

Article Open access 23 October 2021

Software Architecture Challenges and Emerging Research in Software-Intensive Systems-of-Systems

Chapter © 2016

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Embedded Systems
  • Enterprise Architecture
  • Software Engineering
  • Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems
  • Control Structures and Microprogramming
  • Processor Architectures
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Abrial JR (1996) The B-book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Website of AutoFocus with documentation, screenshots, tutorials and download. http://autofocus.in.tum.de

  3. Website AutoRAID, with documentation, screenshots and downloads http://wwwbroy.in.tum.de/~autoraid/

  4. Baeten JCM, Bergstra J (1992) Process algebras with signals and conditions. In: Broy M (ed.) Programming and mathematical method. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 273–324, NATO ASI Series, Series F: Computer and system sciences, vol. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benveniste A, Caspi P, Edwards S, Halbwachs N, LeGuernic P, De Simone R (2003) The synchronous languages twelve years later. Proc IEEE 91(1):64–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berry G, Gonthier G (1988) The Esterel synchronous programming language: design, semantics, implementation. INRIA, Research Report 842

  7. Berry G (2000) The foundations of esterel. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Booch G (1991) Object oriented design with applications. Benjamin Cummings, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  9. Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (1998) The unified modeling language for object-oriented development, version 1.0. RATIONAL Software Cooperation

  10. Botaschanjan J, Broy M, Gruler A, Harhurin A, Knapp S, Kof L, Paul W, Spichkova M (2006) On the correctness of upper layers of automotive systems. (in press)

  11. Broy M (1991) Towards a formal foundation of the specification and description language SDL. Formal Aspects Comput 3:21–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Broy M, Facchi C, Hettler R, Hußmann H, Nazareth D, Regensburger F, Slotosch O, Stølen K (1993) The requirement and design specification language spectrum. An introduction. version 1.0. Part I/II Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, TUM-I9311 / TUM-I9312

  13. Broy M (1997) Refinement of time. In: Bertran M, Rus Th (eds) Transformation-based reactive system development. ARTS’97, Mallorca 1997. Lecture notes in computer science vol 1231, pp 44–63 (To appear in TCS)

  14. Broy M, Hofmann C, Krüger I, Schmidt M (1997) A graphical description technique for communication in software architectures. Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, TUM-I9705, February 1997. http://www4.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/reports/TUM-I9705.Also in: Joint 1997 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference and International Computer Science Conference (APSEC’97/ICSC’97)

  15. Broy M, Stølen K (2001) Specification and development of interactive systems: Focus on streams, interfaces, and refinement. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Broy M (2003) Modeling services and layered architectures. In: König H, Heiner M, Wolisz A (eds) Formal techniques for networked and distributed systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 48–61, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2767.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Broy M (2004) Time, abstraction, causality, and modularity in interactive systems. FESCA 2004. Workshop at ETAPS 2004, pp. 1–8

  18. Broy M (2004) The semantic and methodological essence of message sequence charts. Sci Comput Program SCP 54(2–3):213–256

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Broy M, Cengarle MV, Rumpe B (2006) Semantics of UML. Towards a system model for UML. The structural data model. Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, Report TUM-IO612

  20. Chandy KM, Misra J (1988) Program design: a foundation. Addison–Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. DeMarco T (1979) Structured analysis and system specification. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deubler M (2006) Dienst-orientierte Softwaresysteme: Anforderungen und Entwurf. Dissertation (To appear)

  23. Filman R, Elrad T, Clarke S, Aksit M (2004) Aspect-oriented software development. Addison–Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garlan D, Allen R, Ockerbloom J (1995) Architectural mismatch: why reuse is so hard. IEEE Soft 12(6):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gurevich Y (1994) Evolving algebra. In: Pehrson B, Simson I (eds) IFIP 1994 World Computer Congress, vol. I: Technology and Foundations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 423–427

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harel D (1987) Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci Comput Program 8:231–274

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hehne ECR (1993) A practical theory of programming. Springer, Berlin eidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herzberg D, Broy M (2005) Modeling layered distributed communication systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, Applicable formal methods, vol. 17, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hettler R (1994) Zur Übersetzung von E/R-Schemata nach Spectrum. Technischer Bericht TUM-I9409, TU M"unchen

  30. Hoare CAR (1985) Communicating sequential processes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacobsen I (1992) Object-oriented software engineering. Addison–Wesley, ACM, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jones C (1986) Systematic program development using VDM. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jackson MA (1983) System development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahn G (1974) The semantics of a simple language for parallel processing. In: Rosenfeld JL (ed.) Information processing 74. Proceedings of the IFIP Congress 74. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 471–475

  35. Lamport L (1994) The temporal logic of actions. ACM Trans Program Languages Syst 16(3):872–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luckham DC, Kenney JL, Augustin LM, Vera J, Bryan D, Mann W (1955) Specification and analysis of system architecture using rapide. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 21(4):336–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Manna Z, Pnueli A (1992) A temporal logic of reactive systems and concurrent systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Milner R (1980) A calculus of communicating systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 92.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Petri CA (1962) Kommunikation mit Automaten.Technical Report RADCTR-65-377, Bonn, institut für Instrumentelle Mathematik

  40. Petri CA (1963) Fundamentals of a theory of asynchronous information flow. In: Proceedings of IFIP Congress 62. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 386–390

  41. Romberg J (2006) Synthesis of distributed systems from synchronous dataflow programs. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität München, Fakultät für Informatik

  42. Ross DT (1977) Structured analysis (sa): a language for communicating ideas. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 3(1):16–34

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ross DT (1990) Applications and extensions of sadt. In: Glinert EP (ed) Visual programming environments: paradigms and systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rumbaugh J (1991) Object-oriented modelling and design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rumpe B (1996) Formale Methodik des Entwurfs verteilter objektorientierter Systeme. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität München, Fakultät für Informatik 1996. Published by Herbert Utz Verlag

  46. Schätz B (2004) Mastering the complexity of embedded systems – the Autofocus approach. In: Fabrice Kordon F, Lemoine M (eds) Formal techniques for embedded distributed systems: from requirements to detailed design. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  47. Specification and Description Language (SDL), Recommendation Z.100. Technical Report, CCITT, 1988

  48. ITU-T (previously CCITT) (1993) Criteria for the use and applicability of formal description techniques. Recommendation Z. 120, Message Sequence Chart (MSC), 35p

  49. ITU-T. Recommendation Z.120, Annex B: Algebraic semantics of message sequence charts. ITU-Telecommunication Standardization Sector, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995

  50. Selic B, Gullekson G, Ward PT (1994) Real-time objectoriented modeling. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Spivey M (1988) Understanding Z – a specification language and its formal semantics. Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stoy JE (1997) Denotational semantics: the scott strachey approach to programming languages. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zave P, Jackson M (1997) Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans Softw Eng and Methodol 6(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, 80290, München, Germany

    Manfred Broy

Authors
  1. Manfred Broy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Broy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broy, M. Model-driven architecture-centric engineering of (embedded) software intensive systems: modeling theories and architectural milestones. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 3, 75–102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-006-0011-y

Download citation

  • Received: 14 April 2006

  • Accepted: 18 August 2006

  • Published: 15 November 2006

  • Issue Date: March 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-006-0011-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • State Machine
  • Requirement Engineering
  • Output Channel
  • Interface Behavior
  • Service Domain
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature