Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Annals of Operations Research
  3. Article

Large scale stochastic inventory routing problems with split delivery and service level constraints

  • Open access
  • Published: 21 July 2010
  • Volume 197, pages 135–158, (2012)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Large scale stochastic inventory routing problems with split delivery and service level constraints
Download PDF
  • Yugang Yu1,2,
  • Chengbin Chu3,
  • Haoxun Chen4 &
  • …
  • Feng Chu5 
  • 1974 Accesses

  • 60 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

A stochastic inventory routing problem (SIRP) is typically the combination of stochastic inventory control problems and NP-hard vehicle routing problems, which determines delivery volumes to the customers that the depot serves in each period, and vehicle routes to deliver the volumes. This paper aims to solve a large scale multi-period SIRP with split delivery (SIRPSD) where a customer’s delivery in each period can be split and satisfied by multiple vehicle routes if necessary. This paper considers SIRPSD under the multi-criteria of the total inventory and transportation costs, and the service levels of customers. The total inventory and transportation cost is considered as the objective of the problem to minimize, while the service levels of the warehouses and the customers are satisfied by some imposed constraints and can be adjusted according to practical requests. In order to tackle the SIRPSD with notorious computational complexity, we first propose an approximate model, which significantly reduces the number of decision variables compared to its corresponding exact model. We then develop a hybrid approach that combines the linearization of nonlinear constraints, the decomposition of the model into sub-models with Lagrangian relaxation, and a partial linearization approach for a sub model. A near optimal solution of the model found by the approach is used to construct a near optimal solution of the SIRPSD. Randomly generated instances of the problem with up to 200 customers and 5 periods and about 400 thousands decision variables where half of them are integer are examined by numerical experiments. Our approach can obtain high quality near optimal solutions within a reasonable amount of computation time on an ordinary PC.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Distance approximation to support customer selection in vehicle routing problems

Article Open access 07 April 2022

A Multi-Trip Split-Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows for Inventory Replenishment Under Stochastic Travel Times

Article 28 December 2015

A multi-period inventory routing problem with procurement decisions: a case in China

Article 12 January 2022

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Logistics
  • Operations Research and Decision Theory
  • Queueing Theory
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Operations Management
  • Operations Research, Management Science
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Abbreviations

i,j=0,1,…,N :

Index of customer or depot, where i,j=1,…,N are customer indexes, and 0 is the depot index,

t=1,…,T :

Period index,

C :

Vehicle capacity in volume,

c ij :

Variable shipping cost per unit of product along arc (i,j) where c ij =c ji and triangle inequality holds (c ij +c jk ≥c ik ),

\(c_{i0}^{b}\) :

Traveling cost of an empty vehicle from customer i back directly to the depot,

f t :

Fixed vehicle cost per tour in period t,

h it :

Holding cost per unit product for customer i in period t,

I i0 :

Initial inventory level at the beginning of period 1,

I it :

Inventory level of customer i at the end of period t,

\(I_{it}^{+}=\max\mathrm{max}\,(0,I_{it})\) :

On-hand inventory of customer i at the end of period t, which excludes the stockout of I it <0,

V i :

The inventory capacity for customer i’s warehouse,

α it :

Service level for customer i’s demand in period t (probability that customer i’s demand is satisfied in period t),

β it :

The service level of customer i’s warehouse in period t (probability that customer i’s warehouse is not overfilled in period t),

ζ it :

Stochastic demand of customer i in period t,

ζ i,(1,t) :

\(=\sum_{s=1}^{t}\zeta_{is}\), cumulative stochastic demand from period 1 to t,

F i,(1,t)(.):

Accumulative probability distribution function of stochastic demand ζ i,(1,t),

d it :

Delivery volume to customer i in period t,

q ijt :

Demand quantity transported on directed arc (i,j) in period t,

x ijt :

Number of the times that customer j is visited directly after customer i in period t.

References

  • Adelman, D. (2004). A price-directed approach to stochastic inventory/routing. Operations Research, 52(4), 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archetti, C., Savelsbergh, M. W. P., & Speranza, M. G. (2006). Worst-case analysis for split delivery vehicle routing problems. Transportation Science, 40(2), 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archetti, C., Speranza, M. G., & Savelsbergh, M. W. P. (2008). An optimization-based heuristic for the split delivery vehicle routing problem. Transportation Science, 42(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belenguer, J. M., Martinez, M. C., & Mota, E. (2000). A lower bound for the split delivery vehicle routing problem. Operations Research, 48(5), 801–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. J., Dalberto, L. M., Fisher, M. L., Greenfield, A. J., Jaikumar, R., Kedia, P., Mack, R. G., & Prutzman, P. J. (1983). Improving the distribution of industrial gases with an on-line computerized routing and scheduling optimizer. Interfaces, 13(6), 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. (2007). A Lagrangian relaxation approach for production planning with demand uncertainty. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 1(4), 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Golden, B., & Wasil, E. (2007). The split delivery vehicle routing problem: applications, algorithms, test problems, and computational results. Networks, 49(4), 318–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciupala, L. (2005). A scaling out-of-kilter algorithm for minimum cost flow. Control and Cybernetics, 34(4), 1169–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, M., & Ball, M. (1987). Inventory/routing: reduction from an annual to a short period problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 34(6), 891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, M., & Trudeau, P. (1990). Split delivery routing. Naval Research Logistics, 37, 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, M., & Trudeau, P. (1996). Cash flow optimization in delivery scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 88(3), 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A., & Zipkin, P. (1984). A combined vehicle routing and inventory allocation problem. Operation Research, 32, 1019–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fumero, F., & Vercellis, C. (1999). Synchronized development of production, inventory, and distribution schedules. Transportation Science, 33(3), 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hvattum, L. M., Lokketangen, A., & Laporte, G. (2009). Scenario tree-based heuristics for stochastic inventory-routing problems. Informs Journal on Computing, 21(2), 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillet, P., Bard, J. F., Huang, L., & Dror, M. (2002). Delivery cost approximations for inventory routing problems in a rolling horizon framework. Transportation Science, 36(3), 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, M. Z., Liu, K., & Bowden, R. O. (2007). A two-stage algorithm with valid inequalities for the split delivery vehicle routing problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 228–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleywegt, A. J., Nori, V. S., & Savelsbergh, M. W. P. (2002). The stochastic inventory routing problem with direct deliveries. Transportation Science, 36(1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleywegt, A. J., Nori, V. S., & Savelsbergh, M. W. P. (2004). Dynamic programming approximations for a stochastic inventory routing problem. Transportation Science, 38(1), 42–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koksalan, M., & Tuncer, C. (2009). A DEA-based approach to ranking multi-criteria alternatives. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(1), 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, MA, & Ruszczynski, A. (2007). An efficient trajectory method for probabilistic production-inventory-distribution problems. Operations Research, 55(2), 378–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. L., & Ma, L. C. (2008). Ranking decision alternatives by integrated DEA, AHP and Gower plot techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 7(2), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patriksson, M. (1993). Partial linearization methods in nonlinear-programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 78(2), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Kou, G., Shi, Y., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). A descriptive framework for the field of data mining and knowledge discovery. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 7(4), 639–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, L., Ward, J., & Zhai, X. (2006). On the interactions between routing and inventory-management policies in a one-warehouse n-retailer distribution system. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 8(3), 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchangani, A. P. (2009). Evaluation model for multiattributes-multiagents decision making: satisfying game approach. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau, P., & Dror, M. (1992). Stochastic inventory routing: route design with stockouts and route failures. Transportation Science, 26(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram. Mathematica 6.0: Wolfram Research, Inc. 2007.

  • Wolsey, L. A. (1998). Integer programming (pp. 38–40). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Chen, H., & Chu, F. (2005). Large scale inventory routing problem with split delivery: a new model and Lagrangian relaxation approach. In: 2005 IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics, Beijing, China.

  • Yu, Y., Chu, F., & Chen, H. (2007). A note on coordination of production and distribution planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 626–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Chen, H., & Chu, F. (2008). A new model and hybrid approach for large scale inventory routing problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Chu, F., & Chen, H. (2009a). A Stackelberg game and its improvement in a VMI system with a manufacturing vendor. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3), 929–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Huang, G. Q., & Liang, L. (2009b). Stackelberg game theory model for optimizing advertising, pricing and inventory policies in vendor managed inventory (VMI) supply chains. Computers & Industrial. Engineering, 57(1), 368–382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Yugang Yu

  2. School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

    Yugang Yu

  3. Laboratoire Génie Industriel, Ecole Centrale Paris, Paris, France

    Chengbin Chu

  4. Industrial Systems Optimization Laboratory, Charles Delaunay Institute (FRE CNRS 2848), University of Technology of Troyes, 10010, Troyes, France

    Haoxun Chen

  5. Laboratoire IBISC EA 4526, Université d’Evry Val d’Essonne, 40 rue du Pelvoux CE 1455, 91025, Evry Cedex, Evry, France

    Feng Chu

Authors
  1. Yugang Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chengbin Chu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haoxun Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feng Chu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yugang Yu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Chu, C., Chen, H. et al. Large scale stochastic inventory routing problems with split delivery and service level constraints. Ann Oper Res 197, 135–158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0772-4

Download citation

  • Published: 21 July 2010

  • Issue Date: August 2012

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0772-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Inventory routing problem
  • Stochastic demand
  • Split delivery
  • Vehicle routing problem
  • Lagrangian relaxation
  • Partial linearization

Profiles

  1. Chengbin Chu View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature