User talk:Snotty

Image:Spintriae aus Pompeji.jpg

Hallöle - ich fürchte, man wird dir einen Quellenbaustein reintun, wenn du die Quelle des Bildes (die mich persönlich auch interessieren würde) nicht angibst. MfG Marcus. Kenwilliams 11:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright Query

Hi

I am emailing from a documentary company in England called Parthenon Entertainment and we would love to use the following image within our documentary series entitled Mystery Files.

Perkin Warbeck.jpg

Could you tell me where you got this image from? we would like to use it within our documentary for the rights for worlwide, all media and for perpetuity.

If you can email me at: ellie.davis@parthenonentertainment.com or call me on 01923 286 886 that would be great!

Many thanks,

Ellie

as the copyright notice on the picture's page states, there is no copyright on a 15th century drawing. use it in any way you like. --Snotty (talk) 14:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Princes.jpg

Hi, what's the actual source for this file? Nev1 (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

i don't have the faintest idea, that was quite some time ago. not that a source really matters, with a PD-old license. noone can claim a copyright. --Snotty (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Snotty, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Rätselbaum 2 - Bestimmung (snotty).jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

	Happy Birthday
	Aus gegebenem Anlass, ein SB-Laden. Alles Gute zum Geburtstag. Liebe Grüsse, Stanzilla (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rätselbaum - Bestimmung (snotty).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rätselbaum - Bestimmung (snotty).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Salmson not Lagonda

Look closely, the label says Salmson!

Hi, I will shortly re-categorise this image, it seems to have got into the wrong hole - the strangest "Lagonda" I ever saw, its looks kinda French. Best wishes, Eddaido (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Reconstruction Iuvavum.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Reconstruction Iuvavum.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Steinsplitter (talk) 10:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi! @diff The no permisson tag need to remain on the file until a OTRS member adds the OTRS tag. Regards, --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)