User talk:Grondin
You are not in danger of being blocked. Please understand that user:Mattbuck acted in accordance with Commons policy when he closed that deletion request as delete. If you object to his closure and the interpretetion of Belgian legislation regarding Freedom of Panorama you may request undeletion of the images at COM:DEL. If you object to Commons policy you may adress this at Commons:Village pump. Regards, Finn Rindahl 21:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- My english is too bad to make correctly a request.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 21:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please write the request in French then, and another French speaking contributor will add a translation. I'm sorry that I can't help you with that, as I regrettably do not speak any French myself. Regards, Finn Rindahl 21:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank's for all.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 21:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please write the request in French then, and another French speaking contributor will add a translation. I'm sorry that I can't help you with that, as I regrettably do not speak any French myself. Regards, Finn Rindahl 21:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour, je ne parle pas francais bien, mais si vous ecrire votre demande en francais, un autre membre peut traduisez. Je vous regrette sentir que j'ai maltraité par des puissances et espère que vous retournerez bientôt. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Je retire ce que j'ai dit. La débilité des lois françaises (et belge) et le mercantilisme tout aussi ahurissant de ces créateurs de pissotières portent l'entière responsabilité de ce gâchis. J'ai déchiré ma carte d'électeur en guise de protestation.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 06:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Grondin could you please take my pardon at the case? I hope I can help you around here, if you'd like. I'm sorry for that mistake, but I'm a human and we all do make mistakes. Hope you can forgive me. Have a good day, contact if their is anything, I'll sure be nice this time :) --Kanonkas(talk) 07:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. You're forgiven. Regards. :-)-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 07:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Grondin is their anything I could help you with? Hope you have a good day here :) --Kanonkas(talk) 07:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. You're forgiven. Regards. :-)-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 07:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Grondin could you please take my pardon at the case? I hope I can help you around here, if you'd like. I'm sorry for that mistake, but I'm a human and we all do make mistakes. Hope you can forgive me. Have a good day, contact if their is anything, I'll sure be nice this time :) --Kanonkas(talk) 07:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:LeeVanCleefDeathridesahorse.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Marcok (talk) 22:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
'Closed' means 'closed' and not 'please edit in old discussions'
[edit]The words This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. mean that the discussion is over. The page is now protocted from further edits by you. -- Cecil (talk) 15:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- I consider your attitude as an abuse of you sysop status.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 22:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings
[edit]
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. You can archive your talk page automatically with MiszaBot. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. abf /talk to me/ 11:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Toujours des menaces. vous n'avez que ce vocabulaire à la bouche. J'ai le droit de disparaître. --Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 11:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Cours action bnp paribas 2008.png is uncategorized since 22 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Carte Météo France 12 mars 2009 matin.png is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Jugement ta dijon 0700433.djvu is uncategorized since 9 June 2009.
- Image:Lentille de fresnel.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Cablage hqi.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Macro photographie.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Vp diy pimalator reel.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Photo0110rd.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Yobox8.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:VPDIY ppsoft Pimalator.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Makesysop.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Custoja cleared.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Button COA France.png was uncategorized on 19 October 2009.
- Image:Plombières-les-Bains 2011 017.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Plombières-les-Bains 2011 018.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Chen shui bian cleared.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Chen shui bian cleared.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Jusjih (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I received the email from the upstream uploader clarifying self-licensing and asked him to consider removing the watermark. Once a new non-watermarked version is there, you may also want to have this version with no more watermark as I cannot do it.--Jusjih (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tichey_église_003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stifle (talk) 20:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
orthographe
[edit]Bonjour,
Merci de la correction, effectivement mon orthographe laisse à désiré, et pour le compliment. Bonne année. CaptainHaddock (talk) 09:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:37, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jean_Sarkozy_in_2008.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trycatch (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Maurice_Leblanc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
(talk) 18:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:San_Siro3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
guerreritoboy (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Photo de Bessey les citeaux
[edit]Bonjour Grondin ! As-tu des photos du retable qui est dans l'église que tu as photographié ?? J'ai découvert que c'est une oeuvre tres rare de Claus de Werve ! Merci ! Xaviateur
Oui, exactement !! Le retable qui est derrière le tabernacle ! Et il n'y a pas de photo sur commons. Juste de vieilles photo inutilisables sur la base des MH: http://www.culture.gouv.fr/public/mistral/memoire_fr?ACTION=CHERCHER&FIELD_98=LOCA&VALUE_98=%20Bessey%2dl%e8s%2dC%eeteaux&DOM=Tous&REL_SPECIFIC=1
Tu fais des photos sur Dijon de temps en temps ? Je travaille sur le palais ducal et le musée (rdv avec la direction pour Wikimedia France) si tu es interessé ! Je serai a Versailles pour l'AG wikimedia samedi, y seras-tu ? a+ Xavier Xaviateur
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]![]() |
Dear Grondin,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
![]() |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame-des-Anges de Collioure 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Jorge Rafael Videla.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jorge Rafael Videla.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Cambalachero (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Weather-rain-thunderstorm.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
190.110.152.210 13:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Grondin, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
![]() |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Clemenceau Status.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bob247 (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Colom1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coronades (talk) 01:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Agullana 2012 07 13 07.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Agullana 2012 07 13 07.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 04:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Done-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 10:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Labruyère 2013 02 20 02 IR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pagny-le-Château 2013 01 31 07 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
My today's nomination swept away
[edit]Hi, please, be more careful with your edits, you deleted earlier my candidates for today. Poco a poco (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ho sento, estava modificant aquesta pàgina. Hi ha hagut un conflicte d'edició.-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 19:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- In the case of an edit conflict you cannot just impose your version without cleaning up the mess. In suches cases (it happens often in that page) I go out of the edit mode, refresh the page, and try to include my edit again. Going back to the older version without caring is not respectful towards the other colleagues here. Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- That I've no understood, is the fact that I've modified the page in the last version (not mine).-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 19:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- If in the moment that you want to save your edit you get the warning "edit conflict" it means that somebody started to edit after you started, but finished earlier. So, the edit of the another user is already save if you just save after the edit conflict you are overwritting the latest version. More information here. Poco a poco (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- That I've no understood, is the fact that I've modified the page in the last version (not mine).-- Bertrand GRONDIN
- In the case of an edit conflict you cannot just impose your version without cleaning up the mess. In suches cases (it happens often in that page) I go out of the edit mode, refresh the page, and try to include my edit again. Going back to the older version without caring is not respectful towards the other colleagues here. Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]...for promotion my picture, do you know if I can solve the Jpeg artifacts in any way in the other two? Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 20:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Do it!-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 20:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- I try to reduce without loss of quality, thanks!!!! --Ezarateesteban 01:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version of the two photos Ezarateesteban 14:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Loup 2013 03 03 37 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Loup 2013 03 03 38 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanthes 2013 03 04 13 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Franxault 2013 02 17 01 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Franxault 2013 02 17 11 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pagny-le-Château 2013 04 07 01 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pagny-le-Château 2013 04 07 05 IR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!Dear Grondin, Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can. Kind regards, |
![]() |
- Message delivered by odderBot on 13:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pagny-le-Château 2013 05 08 05.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pagny-le-Château 2013 05 08 05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 21:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Done-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 14:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Grondin, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
![]() |
Botó l·l/L·L
[edit]Hola, buscant coses sobre la ela geminada he trobat . Pots explicar-me una mica perquè la vas crear i si s'usa, o s'ha usat mai en en alguan wikipedia? Gràcies!!!--Unjoanqualsevol (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Me'n servo per Viquinotícies en català com a un giny: n:ca:MediaWiki:Gadget-ela geminada.js-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 16:32, 7 December 2013 (UTC).
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Grondin, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
![]() |
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Grondin⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Merops_apiaster_04.jpg/220px-Merops_apiaster_04.jpg)
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg/170px-Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg)
Dear Grondin,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Logo du Wiktionnaire
[edit]Bonjour,
J'ai remarqué que vous étiez l'auteur de l'image utilisée comme illustration sur le Wiktionnaire en français [1]. Je me demandais d'où venait le caractère chinois en bas au milieu de cette image. Il semble représenter le caractère 漢 mais tout cassé. Pour quel raison est-il dans cet état ? Neptilo (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Il s'agit de la traduction en français du logo de Wiktionnaire en anglais.-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 06:06, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Eau sur mars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Smial (talk) 08:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jean-François Millet - L'Angélus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 00:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Your addition to Category:LangSwitch template without default version
[edit]Grondin, I noticed that you are adding a lot of {{LangSwitch}} templates to annotations in images. Unfortunately {{LangSwitch}} to either have "default" or "en" message and all notes without it do not display correctly and and up in Category:LangSwitch template without default version. Could you add English version to the notes you added to the files in Category:LangSwitch template without default version? I was trying to fix them but it is hard without knowing of the other languages. --Jarekt (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Done-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 18:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you.--Jarekt (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Serge de Beketch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming!Dear Grondin, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, |
![]() |
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Céret 2011 07 21 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Reiners 2016 08 07 01 IR.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Reiners 2016 08 07 01 IR.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ayaan Hirsi Ali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Plage d'el Saurel ou plage de Cerbère ?
[edit]Salut !
Tu as indiqué "Plage d'el Saurel" sur ces 10 photos. Je comptais créer la catégorie correspondante, mais est-ce bien la plage en question ? Selon plusieurs sites (au moins OpenstreetMap, avec une petite erreur d'orthographe, randovia.fr -pdf- et plages.tv), il s'agirait juste de la "plage de Cerbère", la crique et la plage de Saurel étant un peu tout petit peu plus loin et apparemment beaucoup plus petites (visibles ici ?). Est-ce une erreur de leur part ? Si non, puis-je modifier les commentaires que tu as ajoutés ?
Cordialement, BarnCas (talk) 19:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Tu as entièrement raison, j'ai été induit en erreur par la carte topographique de l'IGN. En effet, la grande place de Cerbère n'a pas la dénomination del Sorell. Bien entendu, tu peux modifier les commentaires, il y va de soi. Pour la dénomination des autres plages, il va de soi qu'il faut regarder la géolocalisation que j'ai faite pour connaître leur dénomination exacte.-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 12:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hop, 4 nouvelles catégories pour bien retrouver tout ça (j'avoue, c'est un de mes TOC
). J'en ai profité pour rapatrier 5 photos de Flickr pour avoir un peu plus de "matière" pour les plages d'El Canu et d'El Saurel...
Avant de me lancer dans les changements de commentaires : "Plage de Cerbère" devient "Platja de Cervera", en catalan, je suppose ? Et je ne dois pas trop me tromper si je mets "Playa de Cerbère" en espagnol ? Pour le fichier Cerbère 013.jpg, comment puis intégrer, en catalan et en espagnol "plage d'El Saurel vue depuis la plage principale" ? Merci de tes lumières. - BarnCas (talk) 00:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)- En catalan on peut traduire : vista de la platja del Sorell des de la platja principal.-- Bertrand GRONDIN
→ (Talk) 12:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Done - Merci de ton aide pour la traduction. Cordialement - BarnCas (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- En catalan on peut traduire : vista de la platja del Sorell des de la platja principal.-- Bertrand GRONDIN
- Hop, 4 nouvelles catégories pour bien retrouver tout ça (j'avoue, c'est un de mes TOC
File source is not properly indicated: File:Branchement-hqi-condensateur.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Branchement-hqi-condensateur.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Branchement-hqi-condensateur.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 14:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Éclipse de lune 05.JPG
- File:Éclipse de lune 08.JPG
- File:Éclipse de lune 09.JPG
- File:Éclipse de lune 06.JPG
- File:Éclipse de lune 03.JPG
Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 08:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)