Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikipe-tan's past, now and future2.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
sexistic --Juliana (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- delete - Wikipe-tan stands for growing up in Wikipedia as a sex symbol with childish eyes and long legs? Delete and draw someone more grownup and sincere. --Adornix (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--JN466 21:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Why don't we just completely delete Wikipe-tan entirely? For those of us who are not female, Japanese or otaku, she is not a representative figure at all. Better we force ourselves to come up with a new, more inclusive avatar. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- If there is to be a bulk deletion of all the wikipetan artwork then it should probably be discussed on the village pump, rather than on a single image deletion page. Arguments presented here should be specific to this image, and were I to close this particular deletion I don't think I'd be at all moved by the argument that the image it not representative— no single image will be. Also, those proposing to delete all the images will probably need to suggest a process for replacing the cases where the images are utilized in articles in an orderly manner. You may also want to focus on some of the more overtly offtopic/sexualized images e.g. File:Wikipe_tan_wearing_a_bikini_by_Kasuga39.png. Cheers. --Gmaxwell (talk) 00:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep -- No deletions because of moral issues, please. Denis Barthel (talk) 07:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- We need not be so rigid when it comes to an image that fundamentally—and negatively—impacts our community's image in the greater community and among its own members. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep -- Sexistic is an opinion and not mine. This image violates no rules, guidelines or wikiquette principles. Several supporters of deletion indicate general resentment of character pictured in this image. There has been no general discussion on deleting images of said character and this is not the place to start such a discussion. Concluding, I see no reason to delete in the arguments presented. Kind regards, Taketa (talk) 08:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- I submit that, unlike a number of other images we (and I mean the Commons "we") have had these conversations about, this is an image with no utility to anyone outside of Wikimedia projects, and not useful in a practical way within them. Its use is purely decorative, and decorative in a way that a significant portion of the community (not just women) find objectionable. Therefore our usual standards of discussion do not apply. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Gmaxwel's comment above. Personally I don't see how this image, Wikipe-tan in general, or most Wikipe-tan images are 'sexistic', horridly offensive, or anything. This may have something to do with my associations with this type of figure, but I don't well see how others do. Some have these opinions, some don't, as the creator of this image pointed out. And a discussion on whether to delete certain types of Wikipe-tan images shouldn't occur at DR, and should encompass all of those seen as offensive (in fact, a derivative is nominated here, but not the widely used original). —innotata 21:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep -- 'Sexistic' is a made-up word. Therefore, it does not have a definition by which this image can be fairly judged by one and all. Currently everyone is judging the merits of this image based on what they believe 'sexistic' to mean. It cannot be used as a reason for deletion. 69.106.4.187 13:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Please read Deletion requests for why a one-word opinionated judgement does not qualify as "deletion request". --92.231.227.128 13:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - There is absolutely no reason to delete this specific image. On an unrelated note, I don't see any reasons for completely deleting Wikipe-tan. It is wikipedia's most well-known mascot and very recognizable. - 91.153.24.202 15:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid arguments provided by nom. Btw, being a female, I see nothing sexistic here. -- deerstop. 11:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete "Sexistic" is an not a valid rational for deletion and is contrary to COM:NOTCENSORED. However, this image is the same image as File:Wikipe-tan's past, now and future.png except without the transparency, thus rendering it technically inferior. This this is a derived image which is technically inferior to the original image, it creates a valid reason for deletion. TheFarix (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- The difference is the removal of the text on the original image, which makes the image less usefull. Taketa (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per The Farix's comment. I was going to say Keep, but given that their is a superior version out there, this one should be deleted. This is not an endorsement of the rationale laid out by the nominator, but solely for technical reasons.Jinnai (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep If this will be deleted by "technical reasons", no other author has the easy posibility to improve it. Is it sexistic? You must be kidding. --Niabot (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, nomination is just childish. Maybe some delete-voters should grow up and do some sincere things. --Don-kun (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Poor excuse for a nom reason and per above - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Good picture and could be very usefull for using at Anime oder Manga Lemmas --Dr. Koto (talk) 17:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I'm a woman and I think that this gendergap's initiative is a real madness. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 18:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I like this Wikipe-tan--Хомелка (talk) 18:52, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep This is a legitimate and useful modification of File:Wikipe-tan's past, now and future.png: namely, it has the Latin text removed, making it more suitable for the projects in languages that do not use the Latin alphabet. The only reason it's not in use yet is that it was only uploaded recently. As for the "sexistic" comment, I find to to be absurd. How could an image of a baby, a young girl and a woman dressed in old-fashioned attire and reading books be considered "sexistic"? Or are you assuming that all Wikipedia readers have a stocking fetish and thus manage to read some sort of nonexistent sexualized element in this innocent image? — Tetromino (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Strongly keep — This image has nothing to do with sexism or anything like that. On the contrary, it symbolizes evolution of the Wikipedia from its early days to the full-grown Encyclopedia. Moreover, i believe accusing Wikipedia mascot and thus all the community of being sexist highly contradicts to all the principles of good faith that we always regarded as a rule. Avenger911 (talk) 22:40, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I never heard about Wikipe-tan before so my opinion shouldn't be bias. Take a look at the picture (and forget about any prejudice things). Do you see any issues with the picture? I don't. Oleg (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep OMG! Why delete? --minhhuy*= (talk) 06:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep This image violates no rules, guidelines or wikiquette principles. There is no reason to delete this image--SamOdin (talk) 09:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, the word "sexistic" does not exist :) AndyVolykhov (talk) 12:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: is this a joke? Jcb (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)