Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 11th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maheshgnk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Personal photos and autograph used in deleted autobio page en:Mahesh Gupta Chunduri.

JohnCD (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 16:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. See User:Teles/Mass copyvios. Yann (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from 1976. Was uploaded by mistake. Nerdoguate (talk) 01:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by another Jermboy sockpuppet. There is no truck roll-over sign in the Philippine traffic signs manual. Fry1989 eh? 00:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done, puppet blocked and locked, key lost. Dang. :-) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is the subject of ticket:2015080210014199. Further information is available only to OTRS agents. If you have access to the Commons OTRS queue, please comment at otrswiki:2015080210014199.    FDMS  4    16:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is not clear whether all identifiable subjects (at least one of them is minor) have consented to the publication of this image or video. The photo was not taken in a public place and without consent. See Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#The_right_of_privacy. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license claims that the author died more than 70 years ago, but the author is unknown. The license makes no sense for this image Jarekt (talk) 01:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Picture is from 1921, publicated for the first time in Polish magazine „Żak” in article „Mali obrońcy Płocka” by B. Popławski, but the author of picture is unknown, so which license should I use? Jakub Kaja () 05:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
If it was published before 1996 than {{PD-Polish}} would do, also if it was published before 1945 than {{Anonymous-EU}} would work and even better if it was published before 1923 then {{PD-anon-1923}} would work. --Jarekt (talk) 17:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Jakub Kaja () 17:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
No it is not done, yet. If you claim that it was published before 1923 than you need to tell us where it was published before that date. So far I only see "Biuletyn Numizmatyczny nr 4(360) 2009" in the source field. which is too new for any of the above licenses. --Jarekt (talk) 03:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK Jakub Kaja () 07:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Kept: uploder added required source data Jarekt (talk) 20:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image belongs to Ecuadorian Republic's presidency, and thus does not belong to the uploader. Edjoerv (talk) 02:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 05:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the now given {{PD-old}} very likely valid. JuTa 05:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional poster, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As much as I understand, this is a modified photo from 1980s. Author of original photo is unknown, original is most likely still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not seem to be " texts of laws, decrees, official regulations, public treaties, judicial decisions" as claimed by the license Jarekt (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Copyrighted by the AFA, and designed for the 2011 national team kits. - see sources: (1), (2), (3) - Fma12 (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kzadrian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Argentine band, considering also several times deleted at eswiki via (examples) [1] + [2] AND unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, considering also File:Araujo en la presentacion de Atómico.jpg, per exif a copyrighted work by "Manuel Manso".

Gunnex (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio Edjoerv (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, private photo out of project scope Motopark (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content (movie poster) Trizek from FR 19:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, misuse of commons and wikipedia for self promo, all the contributions of the user in all wikimedia project are for self promotion -- Christian Ferrer 19:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabiprivate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hubert Privé is born in 1955. No OTRS. Copyright violation.

90.61.174.85 19:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it seems the author provided to OTRS a licence ouverte license, and some media was restored, but as this license applies only for information (database rights), not media (copyright), it's useless for this purpose. --Dereckson (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aronsmithdarapstar420 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As with alot of LokomotorasTutorial's images (see here) these unused and unencyclopedic images are Out of scope and should be deleted. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1. File:Antonio Calzada Urquiza.png
  2. File:Carros de vapor.png
  3. File:Casa de los Ecala.png
  4. File:Enrique Burgos García.png
  5. File:Mesa de los Tratados de Guadalupe Hidalgo.png
  6. File:Molinos Rio Duero.png
  7. File:Timoteo Fernández de Jáuregui.png

Just as with a number of other files (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:José Eduardo Calzada Rovirosa.png and Commons:Deletion requests/Copyrighted image by uploaded by LokomotorasTutorial) these image by LokomotorasTutorial has no No metadata file. It is most likely an attempt to use {{Pd-self}} to upload copyrighted images. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be Own work due to resolution, lack of EXIF data and uploader's history.    FDMS  4    20:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

invalid source and author, and is it free? Ezarateesteban 01:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ana y Ana Duo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 21:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 21:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy violo EEIM (talk) 03:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mickelleheijmans and exif, indicating to a copyrighted work by "studio carin verbruggen & ferry drenthem soesman". Gunnex (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo to ask for identification of the insect on german Wikipedia identification help page, which is the only usage of this image. Now I see there are already much better images in Category:Rhingia campestris, so this photo is probably useless. Biodehio (talk) 16:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Didym (talk) 00:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, no context to make it useful/educational, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suhrab Ahmadzai (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot of website, no educational value, out of scope. Derivative as well, likely copyright issues. P 1 9 9   17:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed from social media. Gunnex (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Reupload. Gunnex (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uchohan 1

[edit]

None of these are own work: all different sizes and cameras, mostly no EXIF data, derivative works. Most telling: File:Naela Chohan Australia Governor General 1.jpg and File:Naela Chohan Australia Governor General 2.jpg are credited to a certain Andrew Taylor.

P 1 9 9   17:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The attribution license for the following pictures belongs to User:Uchohan:

So these should certainly not be deleted. For the other pictures, the license is not clear, and those may be deleted. --Uchohan (talk) 18:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all, unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der redirect sollte gelöscht werden, natürlich nicht das Bild. Irrtum beim Hochladen Goesseln (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photos about non-notable people are out of project scope. Arguably the depicted person is a future football star, but Wikipedia is not a magic crystal ball. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted redeleted by Alan, closing manually. Revent (talk) 03:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Also this is small photo with watermark and without metadata, so own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commercial/advert Takeaway (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PoliticsVox 1

[edit]

Unused promotional logos, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-educational table, can be recreated with wikitable formatting, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is small photo without metadata, author is wrong (this is not a selfie). Maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover or poster, likely derivative and copyright issues. P 1 9 9   17:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork (out of scope) or album cover (copyright vio). P 1 9 9   18:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awawaleed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wearegeeks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per Commons policy as found at What Commons is not and Commons:Project scope. "What Commons is not" states "Commons is not your personal free web host" and "Commons is not a place to advertise". Information found at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kin Mera - Livro 1.pdf and the naming of the files makes it clear the uploader is using commons as a web hots to promote his work (music and writing). These images are unencyclopedic (as band dose not pass Notability (music)) and will never be used other then to promote uploaders work. Therefore these unused images are out of scope and should be delete. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 14:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kayenga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without any information, this fuzzy photo in very low resolution is completely useless. Paulbe (talk) 16:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No context to make it useful/educational, out of scope. Derivative, so likely copyright issues as well. P 1 9 9   16:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information. Bad graded down copy of http://www.sv-euroarms.nl/images/galerij/Voor1.jpg Copyright ? Paulbe (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rismai Diyanti (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a photo about herself, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Novolanistanac with similar files copyvioed regarding sr:Tač (bend) (band from Croatia) + claim of "own work" is not supported, considering user page (" I was born in 1976") versus (as indicated) taken in 1978. Gunnex (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. And the same goes for file:Samual.jpg. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mark Gigoló (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Irrelevant to article.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ravi Sharma (Sonu) (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out os project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as a picture of pure text (already transcribed at en:w:Rodolpho_Miranda#Performances [currently undergoing deletion discussion on enwiki]), and thus not a media file. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

RavingNoah (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except 3 userpages and uploading a personal picture, which is used nowhere, except on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of likely professional shot (probably by now-defunct djsportsphotos.com) Storkk (talk) 13:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a borderline case of COM:ADVERT/COM:SCOPE. In any case, the background map looks like a copyright violation to me. El Grafo (talk) 13:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable professional portrait, widely available online: if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Possible additional copyright issues: this appears to be a generated avatar, and the copyright may belong to the originating site. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image by uploaded by LokomotorasTutorial

[edit]

The majority of the image uploaded by LokomotorasTutorial were inappropriately uploaded as {{Self}}. Some are copyright violations and others are Artwork that need {{PD-Art}} tags. As there are so many, I felt I should tag them {{Delete}} instead of each individually using {{Copyvio}} or {{SD|F5}} (Missing essential information).

  1. File:Agapito Pozo Balbás.png
  2. File:Alfonso María Septién de la Llata.png
  3. File:Antonio Pérez Alcocer.png
  4. File:Fernando Díaz Ramírez.png
  5. File:José Guerra Alvarado.png
  6. File:José María Esquivel.png
  7. File:José Vázquez Marroquin.png
  8. File:Manuel Septién y Septién.png
  9. File:Luis F. Pérez.png (Speedy delete as CSD G4)

These images come from the Official State Judiciary of Queretaro website's on the page titled "Gallery Judges of High Court" page. The entire website is "Copyright 2006" as seen on on main page. Uploader cannot us {{self}} nor is can LokomotorasTutorial the copyright holder.

It is obvious that LokomotorasTutorial simply used {{self}} to upload images that LokomotorasTutorial found interesting. Most if not all of these image are copyright violations or missing require copyright information that LokomotorasTutorial failed to supply, so they should all be deleted.


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional material, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits honeymilk.de. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small filesize, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader (who may be the subject) is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned publicity photo published on Generasia, but no evidence that the uploader there had permission to reuse it under a free license, so this is likely a copyright violation. DAJF (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits an "Alwin Malayattoor". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely stock image. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits a "ZHAO HUI". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits "sandeep grover photography". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits "Tong Ngoc Ky". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol from here and here Fringioα†Ω 13:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol from various sites: here, here and TinyEye research Fringioα†Ω 10:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, recreation of content, deleted by community consensus. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, highly pixellated: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait or TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of artwork of unknown source and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and without context, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshots of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploaded by sock. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Maria Garcia. Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 12:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely TV still. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked Stephanie Lecocq. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits www.nicolaslobet.com. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work, probably a derivative - a screenshot of the copyrighted computer game. Sealle (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusably poor quality; regardless of aesthetics, this fails in showing what the alleged subject looks like- you can barely tell it's a female face. (Even after adjusting brightness/contrast, there's no improvement; most of the image is just crushed blacks with no recoverable detail). Ubcule (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect, that this is not own work, but an official document and protected with copyright. Maybe this is photographed in public place, but that case there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible derivative of unknown source photos (Californian flag looks wrong to me, as does the subject's superposition). Storkk (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prabha.prabhakar (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere, except in userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely promo shot or professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prashant K. Umrao (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading photos, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter and copyright-holder of the painting ? Goesseln (talk) 12:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, purported press photo: if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, no source and permission. Sealle (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vindip2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded for a promotional article at en:wp (en:Vinylcaps, subject to speedy deletion request). Hence, probably not a copyright violation, though a copy of the second one can be found here. I guess we'd need a written permission via COM:OTRS nevertheless? Do we want to keep them anyway (low quality, one is stretched)?

El Grafo (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certificate design almost certainly passes COM:TOO in the UK and this is therefore probably a violation of copyright unless the uploader is the creator. Storkk (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certificate design probably passes COM:TOO in the UK and this is therefore probably a violation of copyright unless the uploader is the creator. Storkk (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chenvivc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, most likely (as indicated per source and/or author = "nwupl") taken from official site of en:Northwest University of Politics and Law (= "NWUPL")

Gunnex (talk) 08:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. As indicated "a picture of the XJTU campus in 1970s" (= en:Xi'an Jiaotong University in China), the claim of "own work" is not supported considering his zhwiki user page, where it states that the user is 23 years old. Gunnex (talk) 09:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a my creation and I don't like to upload it to wiki Jkwinter (talk) 09:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Previously used on a vanity WP page Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

KunalShah188 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki (which I nominated for deletion) and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not useful, and I just deleted the only page that used this. Kusma (talk) 11:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mahesh Prakash (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used in any page (except user sandbox). Also, the logo is supposed to be used for social media, and not for an encyclopedia. Oskar Sundström (talk) 10:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copy-vio. 129.13.72.195 11:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 11:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justinsmith2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of artworks by living artists. Permission of the artists is needed.

BrightRaven (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private gallery must be under user area Motopark (talk) 11:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 11:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems a derivative of other work uploaded by this user, attributed to another person, which lacks evidence of permission Tom-L (talk) 11:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused JPG. Image with useless icons. No interest: File:Loprazolam56.jpg is a better version. Cjp24 (talk) 11:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not very large; unused JPG; have SVG versions in use at the articles for this substance. Cjp24 (talk) 12:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

China Organic Valley images

[edit]

These images are all copied from chinaorganicvalley.com. For example, File:COV bird's view.jpg can be found here. The uploader's claim to to be the creator of all the images is dubious at best and it is unlikely they have been properly licensed as Creative Commons. Many of the other images by the same uploader, User:Kirkwood829, are suspicious as well and should probably be scrutinized. --Deli nk (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo depicts somebody accepting Emmy, but it is small and has no metadata. I do not believe own work, probably stolen from somewhere. OTRS-permission would be good, also photo with bigger resolution. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. Mohit agrawal is unknown to en.wiki. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Depicted person is unknown to en.wiki. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The version on en.wiki says the image was provided by Marc Pepin, not taken by the uploader. Diannaa (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Dudek1337 (talk) 01:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, probably copyright violation too Dudek1337 (talk) 01:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 01:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brenda Dittler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 01:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a work of the self-claimed author. This belongs to the Ecuadorian Republic Presidency, and thus the uploader does not own the image. Edjoerv (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

ich bitte um die Löschung dieses Fotos. Ich habe es selbst hochgeladen; jedoch tat ich dies in einem ungesunden Zustand.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

R.K. |

Dear Sir or Madam,

please delete this photo of me. I uploaded it in an unhealthy state of mind.

Yours Sincerely

R.K.

Robert Koller (talk) 02:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saul naula (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 02:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mike6944 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF data, small file sizes, unused as of now, Spanish page on Mara Gasga already under deletion. Seems out of our scope and possible copyvio too.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mike6944 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of a single personality of varying quality, including selfies, candids, professional shoots, and magazine spreads (and some clearly watermarked). Hard to believe they're all taken by the same person.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


as above. Yann (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andres ladinoXD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 04:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afusay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio: It seems TV screen taken by uploader's camera. According to image captions of w:ja:黒岩宇洋, the public people is prohibited from entering. It is unlikely to be own work.

KurodaSho (talk) 07:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 马兴毅 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:马兴毅. Uploaded in a row on 07.09.2013 for en:Harbin Institute of Technology, a research university in China. Considering also mysteriously (different) watermarked files and:


Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeff chenqinyi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jeff chenqinyi and File:内置图书馆.jpg, grabbed from http://www.growg.com/school/8317/pic (Google Cache) (slow loading) = http://www.growg.com/attchment/uploadimg/20120620/13401638271922604661.jpg (slow loading, per file path: 2012). Rest of the uploads by this user with consistent exif but 1 copyvioed file had complete different metadata.

Gunnex (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yetsing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work considering satellite images, uploaded in 2012 for en:Shandong University of Finance and Economics, an university in China.

Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aragon Duarte Diego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. YouTuber with only 257 subscribers.

Kollision (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Aragon Duarte Diego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 04:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another semi-blurry, low quality penis image. Tabercil (talk) 22:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Educational and useful image. Luispihormiguero (talk) 12:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily Deleted by Herbythyme on COM:PORN grounds

NOTE: NSFW!
Unremarkable photo of an unremarkable COM:PENIS. While Commons is not censored, this photo is unused, brings nothing new or better and is therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by De728631 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is not a public domain NASA image but courtesy of the New Mexico State University. Non-free image. http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/graphics.html Uploaded 3 years ago, we can afford a proper DR. Yann (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: I suggest this may be a non-free image so it should be moved to any local wikis, such as the enwiki, that allow non-free image for deceased persons if no other image is available. It is also available here and listed as Photo courtesy of NMSU Library Archives and Special Collections where a search bring this result which dates the image as 1928. If it was published without a copyright notice it may well be in the public domain. Ww2censor (talk) 21:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request: If the final decision is to delete this photo, please hold off until at least a few days from now, since PLUTO is current news this week. Thanks. • SbmeirowTalk15:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Failed to see previous keep of identical image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD tag is incorrect. See the Talk page for a 1930 and a 1965 publication with copyright. Choor monster (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Copied over from the Talk page:[reply]

  • The photograph was published by 1965 at the latest. See The Search for Planet X (1965) by Tony Simon. You can look through a copy for sale here [1]. (You have to click through the images to get to the relevant image.)
  • The photograph was published in 1930. See Alden P. Amgagnac, "How They Trailed a New Planet", Popular Science Monthly, (June 1930) pp. 27–28,123–125. It's on page 28.

Choor monster (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — The background on the use of {{PD-US-no notice}} can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/File:ClydeTombaugh2.gif. Choor monster is correct, this photo does indeed appear on page 28 (also here) of the June 1930 issue of Popular Science Monthly (BTW, excellent work on tracking that down Choor monster). That issue was both published with notice and registered with the U.S. Copyright Office (registration no. "B 76212"). To continue to use {{PD-US-no notice}} it would really be best if we actually could point to an actual pre-1977 publication without notice.

However, copyrighted works first published in the U.S. from 1923 to 1963 were required to renew their copyright registration in their 28th year. Since a copyright renewal has to be sometime in the 28th year, the renewal would be in the copyright records for the original copyright date plus 27 years or 28 years (also 29 years since there are a few periods in the past where the Copyright Office was slow in processing renewals). I've performed a careful manual search of the renewal records for 1957, 1958, and 1959. No renewal was recorded for registration "B 76212" or any other issue of Popular Science Monthly magazine in these years. This is consistent with UPenn's research which says that the no issues of Popular Science were ever renewed.

So, as long as this photo was never separately registered and renewed (and my search found no evidence of such) this photo is now in the public domain due to lack of renewal of the June 1930 issue of Popular Science Monthly and File:Clyde W. Tombaugh.jpeg can use {{PD-US not renewed}}. —RP88 (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's great. Thank you! Choor monster (talk) 15:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've updated the photo to use {{PD-US not renewed}} and added details regarding the lack of renewal to the permission field. —RP88 (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per above. Green Giant (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image by LokomotorasTutorial missing PD-Art Tag

[edit]

The majority of the image uploaded by LokomotorasTutorial were inappropriately uploaded as {{Self}}. Some are copyright violations and others are Artwork that need {{PD-Art}} tags. As there are so many, I felt I should tag them {{Delete}} instead of each individually using {{Copyvio}} or {{SD|F5}} (Missing essential information).

  1. File:Alfonso María Veraza Domínguez.png
  2. File:Ángel Vázquez Mellado(3).png
  3. File:Antonio Gayón.png
  4. File:Constantino Llaca Nieto (2).png
  5. File:Constantino Llaca Nieto.png
  6. File:Dios Padre.png
  7. File:Don Tomás López de Ecala.png
  8. File:Dr. José Siurob Ramírez.png
  9. File:Eduardo Luque Loyola.png
  10. File:Emilio Salinas Balmaceda.png
  11. File:Ernesto Perusquía Layseca.png
  12. File:Ernesto Perusquía.png
  13. File:Fernado Díaz Ramírez.png
  14. File:Francisco de Paula Mesa(1).png
  15. File:Francisco de Paula Mesa.png
  16. File:Francisco González de Cosío (1).png
  17. File:Francisco González de Cosío.png
  18. File:Francisco Ramírez Luque.png
  19. File:Francisco Villaseñor.png
  20. File:General Rafael Olvera.png
  21. File:General Teodoro Elizondo González.png
  22. File:Gustavo M. Bravo.png
  23. File:Ignacia Ortíz y Martínez.png
  24. File:Ignacio García Téllez.png
  25. File:Joaquín de la Peña Terán(2).png
  26. File:Joaquín de la Peña Terán.png
  27. File:José Antonio Septién y de la Llata.png
  28. File:José Antonio Septién y Villaseñor.png (Speedy delete as CSD G4)
  29. File:José Linares.png (Speedy delete as CSD G4)
  30. File:José María Truchuelo Ruíz.png
  31. File:José Octaviano Muñoz-Ledo Pacheco.png
  32. File:Juan N. Frías.png
  33. File:Julián Malo Juvera.png
  34. File:Julio M. Cervantes.png
  35. File:Leandro Múzquiz.png
  36. File:León Covarrubias.png
  37. File:Lic. Juan C. Gorraéz.png
  38. File:Lic. Luis F. Pérez.png
  39. File:Manuel Domínguez Quintanar.png
  40. File:Mariano Reyes.png
  41. File:Noradino Rubio.png
  42. File:Rómulo de La Torre Almaraz.png
  43. File:Saturnino Osornio.png

These are photographs or scans of paintings. Per PD-ART scanning or photographing artwork dose not give the photographer the right to release the copyright. In order for LokomotorasTutorial to upload these image he must supply copyright information on these paintings, i.e. who painted them and when did they die or when were they published. He cannot simply tag them {{self}}. Without this information it is impossible to know if the painting is in the Public Domain per PD-ART.

It is obvious that LokomotorasTutorial simply used {{self}} to upload images that LokomotorasTutorial found interesting. Most if not all of these image are copyright violations or missing require copyright information that LokomotorasTutorial failed to supply, so they should all be deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Apparently this user had problems in Spanish Wikipedia and he was blocked. Also uploaded using some sockpuppets Ben3009, TEDIOD, BENT309o, Ben309-0000, Ben 2000, INTELIMAX, Ferrocwell and Ferrowell mex and a Mexican IP from the city of Queretaro: 187.186.184.143, 189.234.176.73, 189.234.215.254 and others. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 21:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The majority of the image uploaded by LokomotorasTutorial were inappropriately uploaded as {{Self}}. Some are copyright violations and others are Artwork that need {{PD-Art}} tags. As there are so many, I felt I should tag them {{Delete}} instead of each individually using {{Copyvio}} or {{SD|F5}} (Missing essential information).

  1. File:Adolfo de la Isla.png
  2. File:Alfonso Ballesteros Ríos.png
  3. File:Biografía Francisco Berdusco.jpg
  4. File:Cayetano Rubio.png
  5. File:Dr. Leopoldo Río de la Loza Guillen.png
  6. File:Ernesto Perusquía Layseca y Salvador Argain(primo).png
  7. File:Ernesto Perusquía Layseca(José Ernesto Ezequiel Perusquía Layseca).png
  8. File:Ernesto Perusquía.png
  9. File:Ezequiel Montes Ledesma.png
  10. File:Fábrica El Hércules.png
  11. File:Federico Montes Alanis.png
  12. File:Francisco Berdusco (3).png
  13. File:Francisco Berdusco Zamora.png
  14. File:Francisco Berdusco(1).png
  15. File:Francisco Berdusco.png
  16. File:Francisco Cárdenas.png
  17. File:General Federico Montes.png
  18. File:General Rafael Olvera Madrigal Ledesma.png
  19. File:Grupo del Seminario de Colima.png
  20. File:Ignacio García Téllez.png
  21. File:Ignacio Ramírez Calzada.jpg
  22. File:Imágen de José María Truchuelo.png
  23. File:Joaquín de la Peña Terán.png
  24. File:Joaquín F. Chicarro Bernal.png
  25. File:José María Diez Marina.Primer gobernador del estado libre y soberano de Queretaro.png
  26. File:José María Truchuelo.png
  27. File:José Octaviano Muñoz-Ledo Pacheco.png
  28. File:José Siurob Ramírez.jpg
  29. File:Juan C. Gorraéz.png
  30. File:Los Constituyentes y Venustiano Carranza.png
  31. File:Luis Cevallos Pérez.png
  32. File:Manuel Domínguez Quintanar (2).png
  33. File:Manuel González Cosío.jpg
  34. File:Mariano Palacios Alcocer.png
  35. File:Noradino Rubio Ortíz.png
  36. File:Octavio Mondragón.png
  37. File:Rafael Camacho Guzmán.jpg
  38. File:Rafael Olvera parecido.jpg
  39. File:Ramón Rodríguez Familiar.png
  40. File:Salvador Argain.png
  41. File:Tomás Mejía Camacho.png

These images obviously scans from books or photos as such LokomotorasTutorial must supply copyright info for book or photo. They are of such age that I find it doubtful that LokomotorasTutorial actually took the photograph (per {{self}}), so LokomotorasTutorial cannot us {{self}}. However, they are not old enough that it can be assumed they are in the Public Domain, i.e. they are not at least 120 years old per {{PD-US-unpublished}} ("Works of unknown authors or where the author's death date is unknown are copyrighted until the shorter of 95 years since the first publication or 120 years since their creation"- See 17 USC 302)

It is obvious that LokomotorasTutorial simply used {{self}} to upload images that LokomotorasTutorial found interesting. Most if not all of these image are copyright violations or missing require copyright information that LokomotorasTutorial failed to supply, so they should all be deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Percy Wyndham Lewis (18 November 1882 – 7 March 1957) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 11:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: John Duncan Fergusson (9 March 1874 – 30 January 1961) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:22, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Meraud Guinness also known as Meraud Guevara (24 June 1904 - 6 May 1993) has not been dead for 70 years Didym (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это мой текст и я его поместил сюда по ошибке. Прошу Вас удалить данный текст и сообщить мне на почту. Зарание благодарен за понимание. Светодиодная вывеска (talk) 08:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request in own namespace Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in the US does not apply to sculptures/statues. This sculpture was apparently erected in 1998, so cannot be PD. Storkk (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in the US for sculptures Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Gerald Leslie Brockhurst (October 31, 1890 – May 4, 1978) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 11:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pejorative title, entirely unillustrative of the concept of a "hipster" and probably just an attack image. (A user and an IP have been trying to add it to Wikipedia's "Hipster" disambiguation page.) McGeddon (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Indeedous Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:05, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 17:08, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 17:09, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 06:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 17:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Rastrojo. JuTa 20:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Rastrojo. JuTa 20:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The uploader of this photo of Auguste Lumière says he or she holds copyright to it as an heir of Henri Lumière. This is an excellent photo of Auguste Lumière, and I would dearly like to see it remain on Commons.

However, I see at least two problems. First, the uploader claims Henri Lumière created this photo in 1950, but Henri Lumière died in 1948. Second, this photo has been previously published by Institut Lumière without a free license (see [3], [4], [5], etc.). These prior publications don't identify the photographer but date it circa 1935. Either way, as a work previously published without a free license the uploader will need to use COM:OTRS to establish that they are the copyright holder or have the permission of the copyright holder to publish this photo under a free license (and not just that they own a print of this photo). —RP88 (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plutôt que de supprimer la photo, il me semble preferable de demander au téléchargeur de justifier être ayant droit de cette photo via OTRS. Et il me parait vraisemblable qu'il est bien hériter d'Auguste Lumière et héritier des droits sur la photo. Les arguments ci-dessus expliquant le doute ne me paraissent pas convaincants. La photo téléchargée ici a une meilleure résultion, un rapport hauteur/largeur different, un rendu des couleurs et des lumières différents des versions déjà publiées sur internet : je pense donc que le téléchargeur a en sa possession un exemplaire physique de la photo, il ne l'a pas piochée sur internet (ou alors il y a un sacré trucage avec un logiciel de traitement d'image !). Sur les sites l'ayant déjà publiée, la photo n'est pas attribuée mais le téléchargeur indique que c'est Henri Lumière (1897-1971), fils de d'auguste, qui en est l'auteur (c'est Louis Lumière, le frère, qui est mort en 1948), ce qui n'est pas invraisemblable s'il s'agît d'archives familiales (voir plus bas). Sur l'un des sites la photo est datée de 1935, lorsqu'Auguste Lumière avait 73 ans, le 1950 donné par le téléchargeur (soit un âge de 88 ans) me parait plus vraisemblable vu l'âge assez avancé que semble avoir l'homme photographié. Ce site ne donne pas d'ayant droit de la photo, celui-ci indique "Institut Lumière" et cet autre site donne "Institut Lumière / Famille Lumière", ce qui confirmerait qu'il s'agit bien d'une photo issue d'archives familiales, realisée par un membre de la famille (Henri Lumière par exemple) et dont les ayants droits seraient bien ses héritiers. O.Taris (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch! You're right, I did confuse the death date of Henri Lumière with the death date of Louis Lumière, so thanks, that dispenses with the first problem I mentioned. However this upload was not the first time this photo has been published, see the previous URLs I mentioned and this particular photo was in the "Autocromos Lumière" traveling exhibition (2009 2011). I agree that the higher resolution file uploaded on Commons likely indicates that the uploader is in possession of a physical copy of the photo. But since this particular photo has been previously published under a non-free license, I still think we're going to need the uploader to send permission via COM:OTRS (see section "I am the copyright owner but my picture has been previously published without a free license." on that page). Don't worry about any deletion that might occur deletion in the meantime, if the uploader does send permission via OTRS the OTRS team can restore the file. —RP88 (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sirs, I'm very grateful to you both about this discussion. As I detected no errors (but the one on my Grand-Father's death date, which has been corrected), I will investigate right now with pleasure what OTRS can be and follow the instructions. BTW, yes, we do have plenty of copies of genuine pictures like this one in our drawers, as everyone in the Family was pleased to make printed many pix of the same shot.--Casablanca1950 (talk) 16:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS Done (mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Declaration of consent for Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. --Casablanca1950 (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS ticket Jcb (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: John Duncan Fergusson (9 March 1874 – 30 January 1961) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom/Yann Herby talk thyme 15:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Sir Muirhead Bone (23 March 1876 – 21 October 1953) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom/Yann Herby talk thyme 15:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Hugh G. Riviere (1869-1956): has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom/Yann Herby talk thyme 15:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Christian Schad (August 21, 1894 – February 25, 1982) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom/Yann Herby talk thyme 15:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Sir Stanley Spencer KCB CBE RA (30 June 1891 – 14 December 1959) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom/Yann Herby talk thyme 15:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Christian Schad (August 21, 1894 – February 25, 1982) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom/Yann Herby talk thyme 15:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by better alternatives in Category:Benzodiazepines. See also Special:ListFiles/Gotgot44. Leyo 12:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 01:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional picture, see description and license, not used Motopark (talk) 08:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used in any page. Oskar Sundström (talk) 10:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the logo is supposed to be used for social media, and not for an encyclopedia. Oskar Sundström (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. P 1 9 9   16:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly uploaded. 잘못 업로드됨. Finefir2001 (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused recent file. P 1 9 9   16:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent PNG duplicate of File:Black flag.svg. Tom-L (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo non libre. CDB1 (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non free logo, OTRS is needed Ezarateesteban 22:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo non libre CDB1 (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: same as above, duplicate Afd Ezarateesteban 22:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original source for the article (USC archives) did in fact have the image at first. However, it was later proposed for deletion and deleted from the source in which it came. However, it is still on Wikipedia. There is also no statement of permission given to upload this particular file from the source either (when the source had the file). Kanchipuramsilk83 (talk) 22:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per consensus Ezarateesteban 22:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rabt man as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: License laundering (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:License_laundering) The original image was donated to the USC repository, but under a copyright. In other words, the image is sourced from USC, who were given the image as a grant for their collection from the Basel mission. Although the image was supposedly made in 1914, it was published in 2012 in the original Basel mission website. In order for the image to be in public domain, it should have been published before January 1, 1923. It is irrelevant if the photograph was taken before.:http://www.bmarchives.org/items/show/66619 : the copyright was given as 2012, and the copyright information is given in the site itself. :http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/p15799coll123/id/22750/rec/1 : see the statement from the Basel mission (if you scroll down) which says; "All the images (photographic and non-photographic) made available in this collection are the property of the Basel Mission and are managed by mission 21. mission 21 / Basel Mission claim copyright on the images in their possession and require those publishing any of the images -- both individuals and organisations -- to pay a user's/copyright fee. " Achim (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional to what is already said in the previous DR, per USC the photographer was "Inspector Frohnmeyer" who can per BM assumed to be born around 1850 and to have died in or not far after 1921. So PD-old is given anyway. --Achim (talk) 20:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion Yann (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Choor monster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The original plaster cast was made in 1913. The bronze casts were made in the 1950s and 1960s. Didym (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment OK if permanently on display in a public place, as per {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 12:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment However unsure whether we should apply UK or French law: Henri Gaudier-Brzeska is a French sculptor. Ankry (talk) 20:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Located in the Scottish National Portrait Gallery. Covered by UK FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Edward Baird died on 7 January 1949, 66 years ago Didym (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 11:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Paintings are not covered by UK FOP. Recent artist. BrightRaven (talk) 08:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was undeleted, but there is no rationalre or license change inidcating a reason for that deletion rationale to be overturned (I've just come across this by randon) Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably artist's death + 70? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per above, has since become PD. Wizardman 01:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD since 2020. --Didym (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Emilio Greco, (born Oct. 11, 1913, Catania, Italy—died April 5, 1995, Rome), has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Located in the Scottish National Portrait Gallery. Covered by UK FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 08:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ian Lancaster Fleming (28 May 1908 – 12 August 1964) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 11:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Paintings are not covered by UK FOP. The artist is Ian Fleming (1906-1994), not James Bond's father. BrightRaven (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: John Duncan Fergusson (9 March 1874 – 30 January 1961) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment OK if permanently on display in a public place, as per {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 12:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Located in the Scottish National Gallery. FOP applies. BrightRaven (talk) 07:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Benno Schotz (28 August 1891 – 11 October 1984 ) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment OK if permanently on display in a public place, as per {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 12:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Located in the McMannus, Dundee [6]. Covered by UK FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Benno Schotz (28 August 1891 – 11 October 1984 ) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can we tag it so it's undeleted automatically when it eventually becomes PD?--Elvey (talk) 01:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Categorized in Category:Undelete in 2055. --Didym (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I tagged the file. Looked like you tagged this discussion instead of the file.--Elvey (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tagging the file does not make sense, as the categorization is lost when the file is deleted. Actually, the category is the only reason for starting the deletion request.--Didym (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment OK if permanently on display in a public place, as per {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 12:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Located in Perth Museum And Art Gallery (in the UK, not in Australia). FOP-UK applies. BrightRaven (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Dora Gordine, FRBS (13 April 1895 – 29 December 1991) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 00:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment OK if permanently on display in a public place, as per {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Located in Tate Modern, UK. Covered by UK FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Phyllis M. Bone (1896–1972), has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment OK if permanently on display in a public place, as per {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Does not seem to be located in a public place, but in a private one (see [7]). Not covered by UK FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 11:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: William McMillan RA (Aberdeen 31 August 1887 – 25 September 1977) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Located in Kelvingrove Art Gallery & Museum, Glasgow, so coverd by UK FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Percy Bryant Baker (July 8, 1881 – March 29, 1970), better known as Bryant Baker, has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The 2D art display of Batman may be copyrighted and should be cropped out of the picture. Leoboudv (talk) 04:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Coudn't get a decent crop Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(CC BY-NC-ND 2.0), not (CC BY-SA 2.0) Bromley86 (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It appears that the license on Flickr may have been changed. The Flickr review states that it was available as CC-BY-SA-2.0 on 14 November 2011. --P 1 9 9   16:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has a LR Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:King's Medal for Champion Shots (George V).jpg. Is the medal actually in the Public Domain? Then, no reason to apply Fair use restrictions. Amitie 10g (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The medal is PD, but the photograph may not be, since the particular medal is identifiable by the year clasps. André Kritzinger (talk) 12:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Pr above Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free design of the price board. Eleassar (t/p) 08:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo claimed as own work - seems unlikely... Yunshui (talk) 12:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Do not know the problem. Logo was made for our company and me as head of IT department uploaded that logo as actual version. Please have a look at the official company site www.pellasietas.com and find similar logo. bbegerow.pellasietas, 11 August 2015[reply]


Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 03:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prvnwikipedia (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a photo, which is used nowhere, except in sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has requested deletion per OTRS ticket:2015081010020541 ukexpat (talk) 14:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Requesting the deletion of another User Talk page makes not sense, and may be considered as vandalism. OTRS permission are for multimedia pages (File: and other namespaces) and not for User: namespace. The user is very likely to delete the file ralated to the OTRS ticket, but not his/her User Talk page; the user may be commited a mistake when nominating his/her User Talk page, then, don't take too literaly a mistaken action. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am an OTRS agent and it's not just for permissions. The user emailed OTRS asking for his talk page to be deleted. I am not an admin here so I cannot do it, hence my request. So what is the problem exactly??? --ukexpat (talk) 03:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what's the hold up here. This is a simple request to delete a user page. Please action ASAP.--ukexpat (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deprecated compass arrow BSicons

[edit]

These deprecated BSicons (symbols for railway, road and waterway diagrams) have been replaced entirely by other BSicons which follow the naming scheme.

Old icon New icon
File:BSicon mapNORTH000deg.svg mapNORTH000deg numN000
File:BSicon mapNORTH045deg.svg mapNORTH045deg numN045
File:BSicon mapNORTH090deg.svg mapNORTH090deg numN090
File:BSicon mapNORTH135deg.svg mapNORTH135deg numN135
File:BSicon mapNORTH180deg.svg mapNORTH180deg numN180
File:BSicon mapNORTH225deg.svg mapNORTH225deg numN225
File:BSicon mapNORTH270deg.svg mapNORTH270deg numN270
File:BSicon mapNORTH315deg.svg mapNORTH315deg numN315

Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 14:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. Looks like this is part of a dont-talk-just-push-it-aside battle. [8], then just one week later this [9]. And still: this being a "number" (or "text") instead of a map symbol with a common name is unclear. -DePiep (talk) 23:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Tuvalki for your great, great argument. -DePiep (talk) 02:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: The filenames of the mentioned alternatives, of the type "BS_numNnnn.svg" are common with other litteral and cypheral such icons. The misleading preffix "num" is due to its history, first used for digits, but the overall schematicism of the whole filename relativizes its misleadingness.
On the other hand, the filename of the subjects of this deletion request, "BS_mapNORTHnnndeg.svg", are not less cryptic in their whole, and needlessly add yet another two icon IDs under BS: one that’s unproductive for its narrow scope ("NORTH"), and another that’s tautological and redundant ("map").
-- Tuválkin 15:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get your rant exactly. But anyway & ever: the North arrow is a map symbol, not a number thing. I wonder why you did not reply tho this clear fact, anywhere. So we keep the logical name, because of course it is a map symbol. I can't argue against a "it was a number" reasoning. Pleasssse. -DePiep (talk) 02:16, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@DePiep: You seem to be missing the point. mapNORTH as an icon root is redundant and too restrictive (after all, we don't have files called BSicon_ROOT_icon, for obvious reasons), and num as a root is similar to STR (STRaight) also being used for turns. Useddenim (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be missing the point -- no, not me. Someone else does. (In short: it is not ever a numeric or textual thing). It is a map graph. Fits nicely in the system, btw. But hey, who am I to say "you" don't understand it. -DePiep (talk) 01:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of course not. Because you keep diverting. Tyhanks for the smart argument. DePiep (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not anymore. ✓ All clear for deletion, then, concerning files in use. -- Tuválkin 16:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abuse. Someone, even you, removing those links is not an argument for deletion. I claim that you, Tuválkin, are abusing the deletion process. -DePiep (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's not abuse, it's consolidation, and hardly the first time that similar-looking and functionally-identical icons have been replaced. Useddenim (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"have been replaced" is a friendly word for "being shuffed aside". But hey, why would you criticise your RDT friend? Being coherent is not what you all are about, is it. I claim that the earlier names are more useful than the post-created (offensively) names. So far for making friends. -DePiep (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that you are supposed to be debating the merits of these icons, don't you? Personal attacks and ranting are just going to prejudice other editors against what little justification you can muster for keeping these icons. Useddenim (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(File usage is also a reason why deletion of this set is a better alternative than fixing its geometry problems: While only one among the eight icons of this deletion request has had any use in WMF projects, the alternative set has use for all eight icons, the least used being   (numN225), with 8 uses.) -- Tuválkin 16:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"File usage is a reason": no, it is not since you are abusing the system. -DePiep (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Years ago I created the RDT for both Suez Canal and Panama Canal. Quite difficult, done it, thank you. I remember from these days that I never go any support from those brave RDT icon masters. Never ever. And now they show up here to tell me what a BS should look like and should be named like? No thanks. Twits you are. -DePiep (talk) 01:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • IIRC, DePiep, the criticism was directed towards your arbitrary naming that didn't follow the conventions of icons that didn't fit with the accepted geometry. There was never any criticism of the effort that went in to the diagrams themselves (except for your insistence on calling them “maps”). BTW, what's with the Yoda grammar? Useddenim (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The statement that DePiep had no feedback or help from the other users and creators of BSicons is blatantly false, as the publicly available discussions show very clearly. Also, while having authored 2 really good RDTs is enough to be allowed a lot by my book, others may not be so unconcerned by the namecalling. I, for one, was once blocked for one week due to much less. -- Tuválkin 23:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as «no permission» (No permission since), but I ask for a delay, based on COM:AGF. This photo is in scope, and user seems to be well meaning. -- Tuválkin 14:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After taking a better look to the matter, I do agree. It needs to be ascertained whether the uploader is the subject’s father (or whoever took these photos) — see http://www.gofundme.com/eld1og (where the father’s name doesn’t match the uploader’s). -- Tuválkin 16:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Sir John Waters by William Salter.jpg. See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Copyright help regarding File:Sir John Waters.jpg Yann (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are some color adjustment differences between the two. But it does seem to be the same base photograph of the painting. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as «no permission» (No permission since). It needs to be ascertained whether the uploader is the subject’s father (or whoever took these photos) — see http://www.gofundme.com/eld1og -- Tuválkin 16:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as «no permission» (No permission since). It needs to be ascertained whether the uploader is the subject’s father (or whoever took these photos) — see http://www.gofundme.com/eld1og -- Tuválkin 16:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Sir Jacob Epstein KBE (10 November 1880 – 19 August 1959) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: John Duncan Fergusson (9 March 1874 – 30 January 1961) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: John Godfrey Bernard Worsley (16 February 1919 – 3 October 2000) has not been dead 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission, 2D not covered by FOP-UK. Yann (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Charles Arthur Wheeler OBE, DCM (4 January 1881 – 26 October 1977) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Charles Arthur Wheeler OBE, DCM (4 January 1881 – 26 October 1977) has not been dead 70 years Didym (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Frank Owen Dobson RA (18 November 1886–22 July 1963) has not been dead for 70 years. Didym (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Albert Toft (Birmingham 3 June 1862 – 18 December 1949 Worthing, Sussex) has only been dead 66 years. Didym (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is not of Tatya Tope. It's obviously a fake (from the khakhi uniforms). Vishvas vasuki (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marislem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works by a living artist, permission needed. See COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Old pictures, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 06:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marislem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status (had {{PermissionOTRS}} tags, but no corresponding OTRS ticket).

   FDMS  4    19:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was published here. It is one of the last pictures of the Dutch artist Herman Brood, who died a week later, taken at the same event as the pictures in the magazine that can be seen there. The magazine pictures were taken by Astrid Bussink, and it is not inconceivable that the nominated photograph was also taken by her. If not, it is unclear who owns the copyright. The owner of the aforementioned website, pimsmit.com, is Pim Smit, who is depicted in the image himself, together with Brood. I feel we need more proof that the uploader created the work and/or has the right to lisense the image. ErikvanB (talk) 20:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has informed me (in Dutch) that all the pictures in which Mr. Brood and Mr. Smit appear were taken by a third person with Mr. Smit's camera, and that Mr. Smit sent these pictures voluntarily to the uploader (presumably so that they could be used on Wikipedia and by anyone else). My reply was that Mr. Smit should contact OTRS. A complicating factor, however, is that using Mr. Smit's camera does not automatically make him the copyright holder. It is far more likely that the anonymous photographer still owns all rights, even though Mr. Smit uses one of the images on his own website. Unfortunately the EXIF metadata contain no copyright information. So unless the true copyright holder gives official permission, this image cannot be kept in my opinion, nor can this, this and this one. - ErikvanB (talk) 02:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pim Smit has contacted OTRS. For the pictures that contain Pim himself he indeed doesn't own the copyright, but the will let the photographer transfer the rights to him. The pictures that don't contain Pim Smit were taken by him and he owns the copyright. See ticket:2015081710006081 for the statement (in Dutch). Mbch331 (talk) 09:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Permission has been granted under CC-BY-SA4.0 (and added to the filepages). We only need the permission statement of the other photographer to take care of the permission for the photo's with Pim Smit. Mbch331 (talk) 10:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any evidence on that forum that they released their logo under the creative commons license. As such, it should be presumed as a non-free logo and inappropriate for Commons. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there an inherent design? The left portion? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Above TOO Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, reverse image superseded by File:Orazio Gentileschi - Il suonatore di liuto (National Gallery of Art).jpg. Title incorrectly attributes sitter as en:Francesca Caccini.. Ayesha23 (talk) 21:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map was produced by Maria0333, a confirmed sock of LanguageXpert at the English Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LanguageXpert/Archive Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd actually discard the sock version and keep the other version by @Adjutor101: which seems better/valid. --Denniss (talk) 21:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am agree with Denniss, that the version of Adjutor101 is the most authentic & acceptible to majority of the people which should be kept and this propagandist & biased map must be deleted. --Adilswati (talk) 04:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adjutor101's map is based on National Assembly's constituency , Therefore Adjutor's map is more accurate and acceptable and i would also say that the map upload by Maria0333 is not accurate .This should be delete and not only this but all other maps created by Maria0333 or any other sock puppet of LanguageXpert should be deleted, Please also consider the following map it is also baseless:

File:Map_on_languages_spoken_in_Baluchistan.png--94.99.201.82 10:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But Adjutor101 himself admitted that his map is wrong See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAdjutor101&type=revision&diff=167335866&oldid=167326954&uselang=en . I thinks this map have no source . Can you provide online link verifying this election constituency map? It is photoshop home made using election constituencies. DELETE File:Map of languages of Khyber Pakhtun khwa.jpg and its duplicate File:Map of languages of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.jpg

The above mentioned map is disputed, wrong and based on a confirmed sock puppet vandalistic motives( See here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LanguageXpert/Archive) which must be deleted as speedy as possible. While Adjutor101 map is the most valid version, which should be kept as best option

But Adjutor101 himself admitted that his map is wrong See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAdjutor101&type=revision&diff=167335866&oldid=167326954&uselang=en . I thinks this map have no source . Can you provide online link verifying this election constituency map? It is photoshop home made using election constituencies. DELETE File:Map of languages of Khyber Pakhtun khwa.jpg and its duplicate File:Map of languages of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Author Adjutor map is the best designed map which is based on national census of 1998, American authors works. According to Census report, 75 % of the people are Pashto speakers, 3.4 Seraikis and remaining 20 % are other language speakers which means Kohistani, Chitrali, Gojri, Wakhi, and Hinko etc . So, Adjutor map explicity shows 75% Pashto speakers and remaining others. While above nominated map is entirely based on the work of a sock puppet of more than 20 accounts holder, whose main activities are confined to vandalism and gush in false & disinformations to Pashtun, Saraiki and Baloch related articles. So, the above mentioned map must be deleted. --Adilswati (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both maps, find a better map based on consensus and academic authenticity

[edit]

@Adilswati: @Denniss: @Cyphoidbomb: The map I provided was from the internet, that is why I am unsure about the authenticity. The other map is clearly unauthentic since you can clearly see that it is made with Microsoft Paint. In my view, the best solution is to delete all the maps until a map that is approved in an academic book is uploaded. Adjutor101 (talk) 00:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing encyclopedic value Hans Haase (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is used on my userpage, it is a gif so of no use anyway. Not a valid reason. Keep.--Dark Mistress (talk) 03:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy kept - in use as userpage image. INeverCry 03:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, and no longer used on the uploader's user page. The inanity of this animation makes me want to cry. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]