Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/02/11
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
This file was initially tagged by TheImaCow as Speedy (db-noimage) Yann (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Broken scan, no useful information here. TheImaCow (talk) 13:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a broken scan at all. It's what is on the second page of a source document. We will keep scan of blank pages if that is what is there in a scanned book, for example. The numbers mean something to somebody. Some of it looks like lat/long coordinates. No reason for deletion, as per previous keep. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then i'll call it "useless scan". If this caption is important, it should be added to the file description of "page 1". Keeping a seperate file only for a couple numbers is unnessescary. A file which provides merely a caption to another file is not realistically useful for any educational purpose, and especially not if we don't know what the numbers which are not coordinates even refer to. TheImaCow (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- And I'll disagree with that. Part of Commons is supporting Wikisource, which wants scans of raw source documents, including if there are blank pages in a series. Not sure this one in particular is used there, but it was useful enough for the National Archives to scan on their side, so there 's probably a reason for us. And not knowing what the numbers are right now is actually a reason to keep -- somebody knows, so that can be discovered in the future. Deleting stuff that a particular user (or several users) doesn't understand isn't the right approach. We do often upload the backs of postcards as well, even if blank (proves there was no author credited which can be help in proving anonymous publication which can affect the copyright term). Sometimes those get uploaded in the a file, then overwritten with the front, so there is no separate file. But, uploading separately is fine for those as well. Deleting files does not save any disk space, so that's not a reason for deletion -- it just hides the files so only admins can see them. Just because something isn't useful to you, doesn't mean it's not useful to somebody else. This was uploaded as part of a NARA cooperation project and I see no reason to delete it. If you want to bury it deep in a categorization tree fine, but it's not useless. It was part of the source record being scanned. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how keeping those numbers in a seperate file is better than just adding them to the description of "page 1". This is not some useful source text for wikisource etc, this is simple metadata about a image, which belongs to the image it belongs to, not a seperate file. Deleting files saves no space, of course, but they still need to be categorized & maintained. TheImaCow (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- There is no other reference for the values -- if this is Wikisource, they would want the raw scan. Secondly, the background is actually a sliver of photo. But primarily, this is the source document. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how keeping those numbers in a seperate file is better than just adding them to the description of "page 1". This is not some useful source text for wikisource etc, this is simple metadata about a image, which belongs to the image it belongs to, not a seperate file. Deleting files saves no space, of course, but they still need to be categorized & maintained. TheImaCow (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- And I'll disagree with that. Part of Commons is supporting Wikisource, which wants scans of raw source documents, including if there are blank pages in a series. Not sure this one in particular is used there, but it was useful enough for the National Archives to scan on their side, so there 's probably a reason for us. And not knowing what the numbers are right now is actually a reason to keep -- somebody knows, so that can be discovered in the future. Deleting stuff that a particular user (or several users) doesn't understand isn't the right approach. We do often upload the backs of postcards as well, even if blank (proves there was no author credited which can be help in proving anonymous publication which can affect the copyright term). Sometimes those get uploaded in the a file, then overwritten with the front, so there is no separate file. But, uploading separately is fine for those as well. Deleting files does not save any disk space, so that's not a reason for deletion -- it just hides the files so only admins can see them. Just because something isn't useful to you, doesn't mean it's not useful to somebody else. This was uploaded as part of a NARA cooperation project and I see no reason to delete it. If you want to bury it deep in a categorization tree fine, but it's not useless. It was part of the source record being scanned. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it's the upper part of the photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Clindberg. - Jmabel ! talk 00:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. It's useful to have the full photo. Deleting it is a losss of information. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: kept by Yann. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
1920 photograph, certainly not own work. Would need publication before 1946 ({{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}) or OTRS permission. Buidhe (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination See talk page, comments in Czech: Jachympe says that the image is from a family album. I think it is reasonable to AGF on this since the image has not been uploaded to the web before and the claims are plausible. Buidhe (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded by me (Jachympe). It is published in my article in the book (Small region, big history – Slaný and Slánsko in the 20th century. Slaný–Otruby: Wotrubia, 2022.) and I do not wish it to be online here. 109.71.213.51 00:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The CC license cannot be revoked, the image is also "PD-Czechoslovakia-anon". Unless you were alive in 1920 to take the image, you can't be the person releasing it under CC. --RAN (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Speedy Yann (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
{{speedydelete| uploaded the file and then realized it was corrupted and will not play}} AdamJanS (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
{{speedydelete| uploaded the file and then realized it was corrupted and will not play}} AdamJanS (talk) 02:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Ridirect not needed hockei (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: redirect already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 14:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
i uploaded by accident Alpha200807 (talk) 12:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I've been asked to use another picture instead by the candidate. HugoMPR (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused file of fictional Nazi flag CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal video, no educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 02:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator: Indeed. It should belong to social networking sites, not here. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 04:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also uncredited COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: penis selfie; mediocre snapshot of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, random penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: poor quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, midling quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted text material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo by non contributor, out of scope, description "in english" says "🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍". ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo by non contributor, description: "🤍🤍hey brother" ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible CopyVio. File is tagged as {{Own}}, but is marked with the logo of Artsfoh Utrecht which appears to be a design studio in the Netherlands. Useddenim (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, logo above COM:TOO. 47.230.152.9 01:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Bogus CC license, unsure if above TOO. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1 - the rest of this set (there were a bunch) was already deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
La Ley logo files uploaded by Davidroman201005 (talk · contribs)
[edit]As radio station logos, none of these are CC-licensed "own works". I think the hat in the logos may be enough to put them above TOO.
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo by non contributor, description: "🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍" ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo by non contributor, description: "🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍" ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour Quentin42170. Je ne comprends pas votre demande. Vous êtes l'auteur de la photo, vous l'avez mise sous licence libre et maintenant vous voulez la reprendre. C'est bien cela ou j'ai mal compris ? Cordialement. --DocMuséo 20:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's not possible. You can have your account locked, but you cannot request deletion of your images. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. The same is true for the numerous other repeated deletion requests filed by this user today. --Rosenzweig τ 12:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour Quentin42170. Je ne comprends pas votre demande. Vous êtes l'auteur de la photo, vous l'avez mise sous licence libre et maintenant vous voulez la reprendre. C'est bien cela ou j'ai mal compris ? Cordialement. --DocMuséo 20:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocMuséo (talk • contribs) 20:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop nominating your own images for invalid reasons. Read COM:DR for valid deletion reasons. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This applies to all your deletion requests: Leaving Commons is no reason to delete your work. Free licenses are perpetual and upload is too long ago for courtesy deletion. Herbert Ortner (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep All of them: Please stop giving invalid deletion reasons. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour Quentin42170. Je ne comprends pas votre demande. Vous êtes l'auteur de la photo, vous l'avez mise sous licence libre et maintenant vous voulez la reprendre. C'est bien cela ou j'ai mal compris ? Cordialement. --DocMuséo 20:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocMuséo (talk • contribs) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour Quentin42170. Je ne comprends pas votre demande. Vous êtes l'auteur de la photo, vous l'avez mise sous licence libre et maintenant vous voulez la reprendre. C'est bien cela ou j'ai mal compris ? Cordialement. --DocMuséo 20:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocMuséo (talk • contribs) 20:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle* Quentin42170 (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason for deletion. There's no right on images of one's property. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason for deletion. There's no right on images of one's property. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason for deletion. There's no right on images of one's property. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason for deletion. There's no right on images of one's property. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propriété personnelle Quentin42170 (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason for deletion. There's no right on images of one's property. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo car j'ai décidé de supprimer mon compte Wikipédia Common Quentin42170 (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate submission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover; should've been uploaded locally. — Yerpo Eh? 14:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:BOOK. A09 (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://www.mojnews.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%DB%8C-6/304767-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A7-%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%B1-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B4%D8%AF ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
© 2024 Warner Records All Rights Reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my photograph and I uploaded by mistake. I want to delete it. FinalCut123 (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio https://panchjanya.com/2024/01/27/316069/bharat/country-first-female-detective-received-honour/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
© amedeo https://segelreporter.com/regatta/amedeo-verhindert-vendee-globe-aus-ersatzboot-fuer-imoca-gefunden-nach-explosion/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No idea how the uploader can claim that the copyright belongs to "Pierre Bouras", as obviously this is Amedeo on his single-handed circumnavigation on which he's _not_ accompanied by a photographer (did I mention he's sailing single-handed?). PaterMcFly (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos and selfies by attention seeking family of non contributors ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, meaningless meme photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, meaningless meme photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. photo: Erfan Kouchari https://www.mashreghnews.ir/photo/1005739/%D8%B9%DA%A9%D8%B3-%D9%87%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%AE%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%B3%D9%88%D9%BE%D8%B1-%D9%84%DB%8C%DA%AF-%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%87 ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
svg isn't displaying right, will upload png instead Michael7604 (talk) 22:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I fixed the text issues. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Issue resolved. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
this was a mistake Michael7604 (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The old deletion request was not closed but a second one about the same image started. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: issue resolved. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Considering the uploader's block history and the rest of their uploads, it is almost certainly a copyright violation. Deleted CSD F1 along with all of their other uploads. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: photo by Jeremie Pitot ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1 - two uploads by this user with different names in the metadata. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation.
This image is taken from https://www.axiamarinescu.com/photo-gallery.html Neko-chan (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No commercial use of the Material is permitted. You may not sell, distribute, republish or otherwise make the Materials available to anyone else for commercial purposes without the prior written consent of the Royal College of Art. ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
author's requirement Александровы АГ (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
It's a copyrighted logo of a modern TV series. Not sure it is under the threshold of originality since it features some decorations appart from the text —Ah3kal (Talk) 20:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Advertisement for some light bulb security camera. Out of project scope, and probably also a copyvio. Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
smallpenis Sochulove (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Really small, impossible to see it in the scope. 186.175.245.89 16:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
smallpenis Sochulove (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Staatsstraßennetz in Sachsen mit Hervorhebung S 258 nach Quelle OSM Stand 2024-02-02s.svg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by 93.201.170.92 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: depicts an obsolete state Yann (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. History of roads is relevant. Also, hunt down this troll’s DRs. This is not the 1st nonsense DRs about Sachsen maps showing former road. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- As I understand it, at the time the graphic was created it was sourced from then already obsolete data. If the file is kept then it may make sense to give it a more meaningful name, pointing out as to when (or until) the depicted state was still valid. --Cmuelle8 (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Why would the file not be kept? Because some IP troll said so? As for your demand for meaningful filenaming and proper curation of files — how does that obvious requirement, which applies equally to each and ever of the >101 million files we hold, belong in a deletion request? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- As I understand it, at the time the graphic was created it was sourced from then already obsolete data. If the file is kept then it may make sense to give it a more meaningful name, pointing out as to when (or until) the depicted state was still valid. --Cmuelle8 (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Cmuelle8: Please add the source(s) used as file uploader. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Mistakes Gowz (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. movie screenshot https://elcinema.com/en/person/1025735/gallery/123669346/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
old magazine scan https://www.facebook.com/Nice.time123/photos/pcb.1105349749649300/1105348936316048/?type=3&source=48 ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
random web photo, unlikely to be own work https://abroadmarrycomsite.wordpress.com/2016/03/22/marriage-in-lebanon/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work https://www.pinterest.com/pin/566679565605044328/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:Plastoquinone is.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 02:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, {{BadGIF}}. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hungama entertainment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope / possible copyvio: two photos with intrusive watermarks which look like they might have been photographed from prints; one low quality recording of some music (possibly a recording of audio playing on another device). No evidence of permission for the audio.
- File:Pakki yaaria song by umarjaum.wav
- File:Umarjaum celebrating his superior days.jpg
- File:Umarjaum at Hungama tv set.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. These appear to be nothing more than personal files of a non-contributor, uploaded for self-promotion. Marbletan (talk) 14:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
per COM:PS Riad Salih (talk) 02:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 鹽田 Yantian 深鹽路 Shenyan Road 壹海城道 One City Blvd Mall shop restaurant menu July 2023 Px3 02.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 鹽田 Yantian 深鹽路 Shenyan Road 壹海城道 One City Blvd Mall shop restaurant menu July 2023 Px3 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 鹽田 Yantian 深鹽路 Shenyan Road 壹海城 One Mall shop 理想牌 Li Auto 電車 EV car showroom 小車 July 2023 Px3 03.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 鹽田 Yantian 深鹽路 Shenyan Road 壹海城 One Mall 食肆 餐廳 restaurant July 2023 Px3 15.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menus in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 羅沙路 Luosha Lu 蓮塘口岸 Liantang Port Checkpoint mall July 2023 Px3 20.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 羅沙路 Luosha Lu 蓮塘口岸 Liantang Port 商場 mall 深圳激光影城 GLC Gale Laser Cinema July 2023 Px3 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:06.28.22 Central Ohio Student Led Rally for Reproductive Rights 03IMG 4011 (52240618655).jpg
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:06.28.22 Central Ohio Student Led Rally for Reproductive Rights IMG 4078 (52240415489).jpg
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 中國嘉德國際拍賣 China Guardian Autumn Auction 吳大羽 Wu Dayu intro October 2023 R12S.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC hanging banners 中國嘉德國際拍賣 China Guardian Autumn Auction October 2023 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 07:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC hanging banners 中國嘉德國際拍賣 China Guardian Autumn Auction October 2023 R12S 02.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 07:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The copyrighted cover page of a book. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Yandex image search: Alfred Sng 孙 英 豪 (@sealfred) * Instagram photos and videos - Photo by Alfred Sng 孙 英 豪 on July 20, 2021. ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This image is used in a Wikipedia article Alfred Sun that is a "start class" article. Please do not delete. Krok6kola (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: © Oscar Olsson ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ensahequ as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Use without permission|source= https://www.today.it/partner/adnkronos/economia/lavoro/professioni-francesca-caon-public-relations-coltivate-relazioni-sincere-e-agite-con-etica.html Ensahequ (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
source of screenshot: https://twitter.com/OHL_History/status/1154820884231852033 ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://theopinionatedindian.com/inspiring_stories/ias-pari-bishnoi-age-height-husband-instagram-in-2023/cid10976059.htm ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
low resolution web photo https://www.pinterest.com/pin/mens-fashion--524739794095197700/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ofc does not looks like own work TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
no educational value Veliensis (talk) 12:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: ANTARES MARTINS ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland/de#Briefmarken
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO South 將軍澳南海濱 Tseung Kwan O South Promenade 澳南海岸 O'South Coast restaurants February 2024 R12S 01 sign.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.deviantart.com/xenoteeth3/art/Jp-novel-raptor-828394881 ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Vogue Polska magazine cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I want it to Davidroman201005 (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete l Davidroman201005 (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The picture was wrong Davidroman201005 (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Davidroman201005: can you upload a valid/accurate logo then if it's wrong? —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 17:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Krd 05:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
The Logo is wrong Davidroman201005 (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no new arguments from previous nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Villa Savoye
[edit]These are interior architecture of a building by Le Corbusier, but France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. Therefore, these images under commercial Creative Commons licensing all infringe the late architect's posthumous copyright, in my opinion.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Author Le Corbusier is not yet dead for more than 70 years, so this building is not free for commercial Creative Commons licensing. France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maison Ozenfant
[edit]Commercial Freedom of Panorama is not allowed in France. The building author, Le Corbusier, is not yet dead for more than 70 years, so the work is still unfree for commercial Creative Commons license sharing and distribution.
- File:Ozenfant House (50565620448).jpg
- File:Ozenfant House (50566509647).jpg
- File:Ozenfant House - Paris (50566516587).jpg
- File:Ozenfant House - Paris - Le Corbusier (50565627173).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maison du Brésil. France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maison du Brésil. France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Interior architecture. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maison du Brésil. France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unité d'habitation de Firminy-Vert. France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
grabbed from the web https://www.pinterest.ch/pin/795589090399496350/ Albinfo (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. I don't see any CC license there. Rosenzweig τ 17:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The URL given as a source for this photo by "Roberto Ribeiro" (not the uploader) can't be the source, and the file that was uploaded here cannot be a crop of that source JPG file because the image resolution of the supposed "crop" is much higher.
Also, I don't see a CC license on this web site, it says "Todos os Direitos Reservados 2024 © Republicanos". So the file seems to be a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 18:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This recent photograph by an "unknown author" was uploaded with a CC license tag, but I don't see any CC license on the source web site. So the file seems to be a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 18:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 18:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
image used only by promotional entry deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Same for this one. DS (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Colling-architektur (talk · contribs)
[edit]These photos are scanned from 1972/73 German magazines. Some of the files name authors, some claim the author is unknown, some images are claimed to be "PD-ineligible", some are claimed to be under a CC license. Clearly, photos are not PD-ineligible, and I don't see anything to support the claim of a public licenses. So unless some actually convincing proof is presented that the photos are in the PD or under a free license, all those files should be deleted as they are presumably copyvios.
- File:Harald von Petrikovits.jpg
- File:Paul Luchtenberg.jpg
- File:Georg Fahrbach.jpg
- File:Hugo Borger.jpg
- File:Edmund Gassner.jpg
- File:Rudolf Brandts.jpg
- File:Edith Ennen.jpg
- File:Karl Gustav Fellerer.jpg
- File:Wilhelm Janssen.jpg
- File:Hans Rudolf Hartung.jpg
- File:Otto Doppelfeld.jpg
- File:Peter Hecker.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- These simple pictures are not a personal and spiritual creation according to § 2 UrhG. They are therefore not protected by copyright. The origin is known. The black-and-white scan images should stay in commons (for encyclopedia biographies).--Colling-architektur (talk) 14:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- You actually think that these are photographs which are not "persönliche geistige Schöpfungen" (personal intellectual creations)? Well, no. Portrait photographs are generally considered to be personal intellectual creations. There is a lesser category of protected images, the Lichtbilder, in German law. Those are only protected for 50 years after publication. But in current law, only photos from photo booths, automatic surveillance cameras and such are considered to be simple Lichtbilder. The images in question however were certainly made by photographers. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
More files uploaded by Colling-architektur (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files apparently use contemporary official German maps. Those maps are copyrighted, therefore the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Utscheid (Eifel); Wegekreuz Schulstraße Nr. 4 c.jpg
- File:Olsdorf (Eifel); gestohlenes Wegekreuz c.jpg
- File:Hisel (Eifel); Wegekreuz e.jpg
- File:Kyllburg (Eifel); gestohlenes Wegkreuz "ANO 1774 JOHAN ADEM BELTZ" d.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 21:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Urheber war das ehemalige Landesvermessungsamt Koblenz (RLP) mit einer Nachbearbeitung von Lothar Monshausen. Der Bearbeiter wurde via E-Mail um Lizenzierung seiner Bilder gebeten.--Colling-architektur (talk) 08:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Colling-architektur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not obvious how these are in COM:SCOPE. Potential copyvios: no metadata, random varying sizes, and some (22, 23, 24) are obviously screenshots.
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 022.png
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 024.png
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 023.png
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 019.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 021.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 020.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 018.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 016.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 017.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 015.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 013.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 014.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 012.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 011.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 010.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 009.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 008.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 007.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 006.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 005.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 004.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 002.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 001.jpg
- File:Unknown beautiful Japanese woman 003.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as nom. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO TKL Tiu Keng Leng MTR Station notice sign CNY running timetable February 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO TKL Tiu Keng Leng MTR Station shop Tian Ren Tea menu February 2024 R12S 03.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO South 將軍澳南海濱 Tseung Kwan O South Promenade 澳南海岸 O'South Coast restaurants February 2024 R12S 29 menu.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 06.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 07.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 08.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 09.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 14.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 18.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 19.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 20.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng 景嶺路 King Ling Road 香港知專設計學院 HKDI school building March 2023 Px3 11.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK TKL Tiu Keng Leng Community Liaison Centre of Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tunnel Project Cross Bay Link exhibition hall March 2023 Px3 21.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 九龍灣 Kln Bay 德福廣場 Telford Plaza mall shop 美心皇宮酒家 Maxim's Palace Seafood Restaurant menu March 2023 Px3 08.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 九龍灣 Kln Bay 德福廣場 Telford Plaza mall shop 美心皇宮酒家 Maxim's Palace Seafood Restaurant menu set diner March 2023 Px3 08.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 九龍灣 Kln Bay 德福廣場 Telford Plaza mall shop 利苑酒家 Lei Garden Restaurant menu March 2023 Px3 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 九龍灣 Kln Bay 德福廣場 Telford Plaza mall shop 利苑酒家 Lei Garden Restaurant menu March 2023 Px3 02.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 九龍灣 Kln Bay 德福廣場 Telford Plaza mall shop Broadway Electronic Store March 2023 Px3 05.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The author in metadata, "Mamuka Kikalishvili (Kikala)", differs from the uploader, which source is listed as "Own work". —Bagumba (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Same situation with File:Irakli Kobakhidze Cropped.jpg, which appears to be a cropped version.—Bagumba (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose. A person's legal name and names used on Wikimedia are often not same. There is also no requirement that author's wikimedia username or other names used here should match their legal name for us to consider them authors. It does not exclude that author is who he says he is. This is very weak argument for deleting what is a good professional photo. No evidence somebody just found and copy this on internet. It looks like author with access to original photo material. Needs better argument to justify deletion.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The name discrepancy raises strong concerns that the image is not one belonging to the uploader, who incidentally has been blocked in the past for uploading images not belonging to them. Also this looks like some kind of professional/official photo involving the subject which would also cast doubt on the copyright owner. Overall per the precautionary principle I think there's too much doubt about this, unless an OTRS ticket or similar can verify it. Amakuru (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- To prevent the deletion of this photo, taken by the famous photographer Mamuka Kikalishvili (a.k.a Kikala), but with usage rights belonging to the Political Party 'Georgian Dream,' please tell me what we need to upload to avoid deletion here. Regarding previous deletions, they were mistakes and will not be repeated.NobodyUser (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have been working with the Government of Georgia for a long time and believe I have the right to upload certain information. Unfortunately, I am unable to provide the original file, but I can inform the media relations team of the Government of Georgia to respond officially through their government email. If you could advise me on what information I can provide to avoid deletion, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you!NobodyUser (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - copyvio. Emperor of Emperors (talk) 02:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 004.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 005.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 006.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo by non contributor, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 019.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 132.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 131.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall shop 潮順館 Chiu Shun Restaurant menu March 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD Kln 九龍灣 Kowloon Bay MegaBox shopping mall restaurant directory sign March 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
since this recording was published in 1959, it would be copyrighted in the United States until 15 Feb. 2067, according to COM:HIRTLE. Prospectprospekt (talk) 03:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Deleteyep this is not a public domain recording in the United States even if the composition is. SDudley (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Windsor House mall MCL Grand Windsor Cinemas August 2020 SS2 04.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted light boxes in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Windsor House mall MCL Grand Windsor Cinemas August 2020 SS2 07.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Windsor House mall MCL Grand Windsor Cinemas August 2020 SS2 31.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted light boxes in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 記利佐治街 Great George Street 翡翠明珠廣場 JP Plaza mall August 2020 SS2 18.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted light boxes in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Windsor House mall MCL Grand Windsor Cinemas August 2020 SS2 11.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Windsor House mall MCL Grand Windsor Cinemas August 2020 SS2 28.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted screenshots in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Solomon203 (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 08:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily (F1). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake MjhdNfl (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Not uploaded in the last 7 days. Useful image of subject. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, not realisticly reusable. It is unclear what this chart is about: Whose consumption profile is it (specific household/company, plural or single, etc.)? What location (country, city, area)? What is the source of the data? The uploader did not response to my questions in the Talk page. JopkeB (talk) 07:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reaction on User talk:Queenwe:
- files are out of date OK to delete as far as I am concerned. Data was correct when filed. 72.239.53.116 04:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
--JopkeB (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, out of scope - not an official proposal and a personal work by the uploader. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, out of scope - not an official proposal and a personal work by the uploader. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, out of scope - not an official proposal and a personal work by the uploader. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, out of scope - Maguindanao del Norte has no flag and likely just a personal proposal of the uploader Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, out of scope - not an official proposal and a personal work by the uploader. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, out of scope, unofficial variant of an existing flag in green rather than blue as per File:Southern Leyte.gif and File:Imelda Marcos.jpg Hariboneagle927 (talk) 10:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:HK KTD 觀塘區 Kwun Tong 牛頭角道 3-5 Ngau Tau Kok Road TBG 得寶商場 Tak Bo Garden shopping mall March 2023 Px3 122.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Dronebogus (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This picture looks like foto taken from a magazine and not like an original foto. So i think it is maybe a copyright-vio. Elfabso (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Bad quality photo of someone who is not described beyond the person's name. Out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 14:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am including the quasi-duplicate
- in this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 14:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
cropped web image. source: https://sneg.top/66686-avatarka-podsnezhniki.html (named "Бойчечак Гули") ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
i want to delete all the photos are upload on wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This is one of my work and I want to delete it. Awinology (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- If it's not abstract art, this photo is not even worth the time to discuss it. Delete. 200.111.17.211 22:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: dup submission, see above. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete all the photos uploaded to Wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, this one no. 200.111.17.211 22:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In scope and courtesy deletion period ended. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the creator of this artwork and I kindly request its removal. It was uploaded mistakenly, and I would appreciate if you could consider removing it from Wikipedia. Awinology (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, repeated nomination without new arguments. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete all the photos uploaded to Wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope personal image. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my artwork and I want to delete it. Awinology (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Which art? OOS? Delete. 200.111.17.211 22:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope personal image. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete all the photos uploaded to Wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In scope and courtesy deletion period ended. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the creator of this artwork and I kindly request its removal. It was uploaded mistakenly, and I would appreciate if you could consider removing it from Wikipedia. Awinology (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, repeated nomination without new arguments. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete all the photos uploaded to Wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK but better keep this one. 200.111.17.211 22:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In scope and courtesy deletion period ended. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the creator of this artwork and I kindly request its removal. It was uploaded mistakenly, and I would appreciate if you could consider removing it from Wikipedia. Awinology (talk) 12:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, repeated nomination without new arguments. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Architectural Photographer, Manuel Sá. All rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
stupid instagram photo, that makes fun of holocaust victims ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
"source: Instagram" ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, not freely licenced at source. Belbury (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
inetrnet stream screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
magazine cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: profile picture on Facebook since 8 February https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=382057631081379&set=a.101954829091662 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete under F10. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 19:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete all the photos uploaded to Wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Then please stop doing so. Commons licenses are not revokable, so this will not be done. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. F10 186.174.118.19 00:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no such highway, either in existence or planned. There are no published specifications for a four-digit Interstate Highway marker. There is no educational value to having this image on Commons. Imzadi 1979 → 21:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no US Route 173, so it's unnecessary. This graphic does not follow the specifications to create a US 173 marker if the highway did exist. If we needed such a graphic, we would create an SVG using the existing templates to have a high-quality version that followed actual sign specifications. Imzadi 1979 → 21:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Probable Flickrwashing, previously published at https://x.com/emmadsupremacy/status/1747662678485520589?s=46&t=oJp0ZdwBEjuLebncUcoHSQ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The link that you post its actually from a fan page of the actor, it´s not their photo. Sophie Vittoria (talk) 05:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Sophie Vittoria But the link provided, https://www.flickr.com/photos/199983499@N02/53498656907/, uploaded the photo on January 31, two weeks after the Twitter post, so that’s not the source either. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Fotograf: Albin Händig https://www.parabol.press/kanda-svenskchilenare-sa-paverkades-vi-av-kuppen/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Nasser Almalhawi ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Useless file. The file contains a phone number, which is violation of the privacy policy. And also the file is not useful an educational purpose, Wikimedia Commons is not a place to advertise. Surə 🗯 16:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
삭제 요청이 있음 Iyaiya2323 (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Sourced to Instagram. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) Krd 07:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- the author is an "fotografo anonimo" meaning we don't know who he is ZioNicco (talk) 08:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, I misread the description when moving the image from it.wikipedia (where it should had been deleted in the first place). --Cavarrone (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Cecilia cubas obra benefica en año 2022 en el Teleton en la capital de Asuncion de Paraguay.png
[edit]low resolution photo from Cecilia Cubas fan collection ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
low resolution photo from Cecilia Cubas fan collection ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
This image was uploaded as "own work" but a reverse image search seems to prove otherwise. Uploader's Commons account is banned. Sewageboy (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
This image was uploaded as "own work" but a reverse image search seems to prove otherwise. Uploader's Commons account is banned. Sewageboy (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
From a gallery licensed CC-BY-ND: http://govpics.maryland.gov/pages/Agreement.aspx?EventItem=19931&ImageItem=932445&Month=11&Day=17&Year=2023&Event=Work+Zone+Safety&Photographer=Joe%20Andrucyk&Path=ImageHandler.ashx?EventID=19931&ImageID=932445&Thumbs=False Adeletron 3030 (talk) 23:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Two issues: the authorship claim is pretty dubious. Secondly is this really simple enough for PD-text ? There's obviously a stylised apple at the start of this logo (the company operates supermarkets). I'm unfamiliar with Chilean trademark law though. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. As the logo is created of circles, I accept it as simple logo. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep
- +1 per Taivo,
- +: We also have a request from the company to keep the file per support Ticket:2024021210011274. However their email however is lacking an acceptable licence specification. Asking a company to release something under cc-by-sa often leads to long tedious correspondence. Accepting the logo as simple will keep things simple.
- I have marked the logo with the trademarked template. Mussklprozz (talk) 08:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work https://christopraxy.blogspot.com/2020/06/blog-post_10.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work https://dolat.ir/detail/311054 ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: nicolas lieber / photographie ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: @takdare ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: @takdare ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. image by Galal Mohey https://www.artstation.com/artwork/bYbem ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
watermark: Ali Shirband ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Theresa Wallrath M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
©2017 La Coopérative-Collection Cérès Franco ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
penis snapshot, at least this one is reasonably lit and in focus, but not sure it's useful as pic common object which we already have many better photos of. Not the same image as a previously deleted photo of the same name. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.instagram.com/mptourism/p/CG4LwTRI-WR/?img_index=5 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Michael Giannatiempo ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for artwork (COM:FOP Russia). — Redboston 19:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SS. bdijkstra (overleg) 20:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of the text on the sign. Freedom of panorama in the UK doesn't cover literary works. bjh21 (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Low quality image with incorrect format (JPEG is suited for photographs, not for chemical reactions' equations). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The file was replaced by File:Arginin és víz reakciója.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The U.S. copyright status of this photograph is technically uncertain with the current information we have about it (dated "1970s"). Frederick IX died in 1972. Unless we can verify that this photograph was created before 1970, the U.S. copyright may be restored by the URAA as being copyrighted in Denmarck with the 50 years after creation term applied to post-1970 non-artistic photographs per {{PD-Denmark50}}. 83.61.247.43 02:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: We don't have the practice to delete Not-PD-US-URAA files which are PD in the country of origin; see case 1, case 2, case 3, case 4, ..., and Discussion where we decided that URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. --Ruthven (msg) 10:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Unclear date of creation for this portrait photograph. Unless we can precise the date, this photograph from the 1970s may be still copyrighted in the U.S. due to the URAA. Note also that if the creation date is after 1970, according with {{PD-Denmark50}}, the copyright term for non-artistic photographs expires 50 years after their creation date. See this entry for more details. A previous deletion request was closed arguing that “We don't have the practice to delete Not-PD-US-URAA files which are PD in the country of origin” and that “URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion”. However, in fact, the current consensus per Commons:Licensing and Commons:URAA-restored copyrights is (and has been for quite some years) that if a work is still protected in the U.S. by the URAA that can be the sole reason for deletion. Reply to @Rosenzweig for clarification. 81.41.176.97 21:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already discussed, no precedent to delete Not-PD-US-URAA files which are PD in the country of origin Dmartin969 (talk) 08:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Dmartin969, in fact there are various precedents about deletions of non-US works currently in the Public Domain in their country of origin but with their U.S. copyright restored by the URAA, see this DR resolution, see also this other one for more details. In fact “a confirmed URAA violation definitely can be the cause for deletion of a file” (quoting @Holly Cheng). We have to assume the URAA may be applied to this photograph unless we can determinate and confirm that it was created before 1970 (or, if created later, it was simultaneously published both in Denmark and the United States). 81.41.176.97 13:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Dmartin969: There is ample precedent to delete files which are protected in the US because of the URAA while being in the public domain in their source country/country of origin. This is Commons policy (COM:URAA). Template {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is a stopgap for older files affected by the URAA; it must not be used for files uploaded after March 1, 2012. So it is not applicable to this file which was uploaded in 2023.
- Using reverse image search, you can find a copy of this file at Reddit, where the uploader says it is from 1969, which seems plausible when comparing it to other images of the person. Shutterstock dates it to January 1, 1972, which seems rather implausible (January 1, really?) and unlikely given that per en.wp, he became sick the day before, received treatment for pneumonia on that exact date of January 1 and then died on January 14, 1972.
- Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Denmark#Photographs, a 1969 “simple“ photograph was protected for 25 years from creation, until the end of 1994, which means it escaped the URAA (URAA restoration date for Denmark was January 1, 1996). If this photo is a “simple“ photograph or a photographic work (with a term of protection of 70 years pma) is a matter of debate, apparently there are no court decisions about this, and I remember the threshold for such a distinction being traditionally rather high in the Scandinavian countries. Meaning that this could be a “simple“ photograph even though it is clearly posed.
- As noted, there are some artefacts apparently caused by AI use for upscaling or watermark removal. That could be a cause for deletion even if copyright was not. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig, if the 1969 claim is correct, then I withdraw my nomination as I created it concerning about the copyright, which appears to be resolved now. However, feel free to keep this DR for discussing the AI use at this photograph if needed. 81.41.176.97 15:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of the depicted information board. FOP can't save it because that doesn't apply to graphic works in the UK. bjh21 (talk) 20:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artist died in 1972 Carl Ha (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artist died in 2023 Carl Ha (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
video screeshot. source: https://www.rodcarmona.com/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://marciabrady.tumblr.com/post/185128461616/adriana-caselotti-a-few-years-before-her-death-in ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
2005 book cover https://www.zvab.com/9783775716833/Anton-Kolig-M%C3%A4nnliche-Aktzeichnungen-3775716831/plp ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Anton Kolig is PD, the rest is simple shapes and letters. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Herbert Ortner. Simple title added on top of public domain work is not sufficiently creative to attract a new copyright. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
2018 book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Klimt died in 1918! This is Public Domain. The letters don't make this a creative work of its own. Herbert Ortner (talk) 06:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Herbert Ortner. Simple title added on top of public domain work is not sufficiently creative to attract a new copyright. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
2007 book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Klimt died in 1918! This is Public Domain. The letters don't make this a creative work of its own. Herbert Ortner (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Herbert Ortner. Simple title added on top of public domain work is not sufficiently creative to attract a new copyright. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
no evidence that the YouTube video in the source was released under a free license. Prospectprospekt (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
artwork not in public domain gpesenti (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.india.com/explainer/atags-the-indigenous-howitzer-made-in-india-gun-used-for-first-time-during-ceremonial-salute-at-red-fort-independence-day-watch-video-5572876/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photos by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. Sudoviaball (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. Sudoviaball (talk) 14:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://ar-ar.facebook.com/boghche/posts/1816200581927103/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.goodreads.com/characters/23394 ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- del' - concur. author: w:Kukryniksy. Altenmann (talk) 04:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.sports.fr/football/angleterre/manchester-united/manchester-united-la-drole-de-statistique-775525.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, it doesn't look like it's his own work. Guyrichtheman (talk) 02:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.desdesoria.es/articulo/destacado/53917/20130806155024592279.html#photo-7 ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Malerei von Anne-Lan https://www.artmajeur.com/anne-lan/de/artworks/191953/reve-de-chat ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
low quality personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Buongiorno,come esserti utile?Non ho comunque decido definitivamente,per quest'articolo. Sisto Fusco (talk) 08:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
This was submitted to a comic competition page that released all submissions as CC-BY, but appears to have been made using pre-existing clipart: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/soccer-referee-giving-yellow-card-football-84843664 Belbury (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. צילום: אושרי כהן (Oshri Cohen) https://yoka.co.il/akko-mimun-hamonim/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Ashton Bowers Facebook photo https://www.thetelegraph.com/sports/article/ashton-bowers-plays-world-dad-played-jerseyville-17834778.php#taboola-2 ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.forwardpress.in/2018/07/how-did-a-maths-teacher-hurt-dainik-jagrans-patna-edition/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
© Thomas Marek ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Creator, unused file, no longer needed. Arflhn (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if own work, Кукрыниксы (Kukryniksy) were three caricaturists/cartoonists in the USSR, see w:Kukryniksy
- File:Киса Воробьянинов.png
- File:Зося Синицкая и старик Синицкий.png
- File:Васисуалий Лоханкин.png
- File:Арест зицпредседателя Фунта.png
- File:Adam Kozlevich.png
Дима Г (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- support deletion - way before eligibility for public domain. (not to say that Kukryniksy could not have possibly opload these :-) Altenmann (talk) 04:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The first version has a copyrighted box art, but the last three versions don't have the box. 47.230.152.9 20:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree on removal of box art which is needed to show manufacturer. The JPGs show DECADES OLD product to display what the product is. There is no finacial gain to show the box which is also widely shown in and search engine of online images. CRTGAMER (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- None of that is relevant. Copyright is not contingent upon something being financially useful to the rights holder. "Decades" (which in this case is about 27 years – 1997–2024) is generally not sufficient for something to be out of copyright – these things are defined in law (which varies by country) and are usually much longer. (In the US published works are copyrighted for the life of the author + 70 years I believe; I think it's 95 years from publication/120 years from creation for works by companies.) Under specific circumstances Fair Use (or similar) may apply, but Wikimedia Commons does not accept non-free files on fair use grounds. (The English Wikipedia does, but I don't see a valid Fair Use justification unfortunately. It is not "needed to show [the] manufacturer" as it is printed on the controller itself, although I don't think that would be a valid reason anyway.) AFAIK the photo of the controller itself is fine as it is a 2D image of a 3D object and the logos, which are stylised text, do not meet the threshold of originality, so are only subject to trademark not copyright. That's why it was cropped in the first place. Alphathon /ˈæɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete ASAP for Version of 20:04, 8 April 2012 because of this COM:DW. The image is copyrighted by SONY. --Mosbatho (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Kept later file revisions, revision-deleted derivative work in first file version. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
A pictoral image of Taivo Aina 200.111.17.211 20:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant copyvio from Instagram. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Ass own work 186.175.245.89 16:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I mean uploaded as own work. 186.175.245.89 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 00:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Building is in France, where commercial Freedom of Panorama is not allowed. The author, architect Le Corbusier, is not yet dead for more than 70 years and thus the building is still under his posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Vladimir Putin awarded the staff of the NPO "Splav" enterprise with the Order "For Valiant Labor".png
[edit]It turns out that we renamed it in vain, but I think no one will object to deleting this file, since this file is a screenshot from a video and is different from the uploaded higher quality image, which has a different URL and extension. Thank you! — ArtSmir (talk) 06:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion given. @ArtSmir, please take a look at the list Commons:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion. (to be in some ways different is not a reason; This image is already marked with the template "Superseded by JPG"). --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cité-refuge de l'Armée du Salut. France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
No longer necessary, since this file has been updated with a higher quality version. Also has a watermark. Sudoviaball (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
While the film itself is in the public domain in the United States, this video contains an intro which appears to be based on a newer movie poster and likely not in the public domain or under a free license. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 07:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If that is the case, a new version can be made that cuts it away and the prior version deleted via RevDel. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, please Delete only the revision, but don't delete the entire file. @Yann: please be careful next time of copyrighted intro titles. I'm uploading a cropped version now. PseudoSkull (talk) 09:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Crop Done PseudoSkull (talk) 09:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Thanks to PseudoSkull. With V2C, it is not possible to upload only a part. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
No longer necessary, as this file has been superseded by a higher quality version. Sudoviaball (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Any uses should be moved before deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Is there a way to merge the two files into one, rather than deleting this file? I.e. upload what's at File:The Circus (1928).webm here, instead of deleting this title? I'd like not to move all the 158 uses at https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:The_Circus_(1928)_by_Charlie_Chaplin_(restored_version).webm if I can help it. Although it will be easier than in other cases, since the videos are the exact same length. SnowyCinema (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- There is Commons:History merging and splitting. You can ask. OGPawlis (talk) 11:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 11:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Holger Baer M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Picture was uploaded with approval of our friend and photographer Holger Baer Soldator (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. @Soldator: Please follow CM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 11:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Holger Baer M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Holger Baer M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Holger Baer M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Holger Baer M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary, since this file exists. Sudoviaball (talk) 10:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
No source, no author, no permission, questionable license Achim55 (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am Anne O'Brien, Christian's Niece, who took that photo and give it free licence to be used on Wikipedia. SpooksBGone (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine. How did you take this photo in 2017 when Christian died in 2001? IMO the photo seems to have been taken in the 70s or 80s. --Achim55 (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't taken in 2017, I took it in 1976 in the Cam Valley. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- You claimed at the en.wiki article on O'Brien that you "Restored image after O'Brien's fake Grandson Zelenko deleted it." Yes, User:EugeneZelenko deleted it but never claimed a relationship. See this from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jstars780
- I am the grandson of Christian O'Brien. This is a scan of a print owned by Christian O'Brien, now in my ownership. It is difficult to determine precisely when the photo was taken. Given that he appears to be in his 50s, it would seem likely that the photo was taken in the mid to late 1960s. It would have almost certainly been taken in the United Kingdom where he lived. Jstars780 (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- And given your creation of an unacceptable attack page on en.wiki saying you were coming for someone - I'd argue that unless you can explain yourself you aren't a useful editor here. Just the fact that you made the false claim suggests a competence issue. Doug Weller (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looking ata SpoosBGone edits here, they started off by posting to various people attacks on EugeneZelenko. Doug Weller (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's SpooksBGone. Do some spellchecking before throwing around accusations about people's competencies. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also, what is unacceptable about coming to debate topics with other editors? This is not an attack but a challenge, this is how Wikipedia should be built. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This Jstars780 account I mistook for Zelenko has a couple of other edits about Pakistan, I'd suggest you admin types check out who he/she/they are making the false claim and if they made any others? SpooksBGone (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- No admins have posted here. Doug Weller (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This Jstars780 account I mistook for Zelenko has a couple of other edits about Pakistan, I'd suggest you admin types check out who he/she/they are making the false claim and if they made any others? SpooksBGone (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @SpooksBGone Sorry about the typo. Spellcheckers don't work well with names (and I see that when I type here is a spellchecker, maybe it was my Parkinson's.) Doug Weller (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The original photo he/she/they removed is probably somewhere over in my Nephew Grant's farm in Daventry, if you want proof. I can probably get him to dig it out. SpooksBGone (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also, what is unacceptable about coming to debate topics with other editors? This is not an attack but a challenge, this is how Wikipedia should be built. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's SpooksBGone. Do some spellchecking before throwing around accusations about people's competencies. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looking ata SpoosBGone edits here, they started off by posting to various people attacks on EugeneZelenko. Doug Weller (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't taken in 2017, I took it in 1976 in the Cam Valley. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine. How did you take this photo in 2017 when Christian died in 2001? IMO the photo seems to have been taken in the 70s or 80s. --Achim55 (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I added some info SpooksBGone provided above and I'm tending to revoke this DR and keep the photo if there is some info on how this photo has come to be published on https://www.goldenageproject.org.uk/biographies.php. --Achim55 (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- That was my Cousin Edmund's website, which my daughter Linda still maintains. I allowed Ned to use it freely before his passing in 2021. SpooksBGone (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Achim55 That's a blast from the past. I remember seeing that when O'Brien's article was first created by a fringe editor (and later sockmaster) and i ran across that page. Doug Weller (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fine, thank you. Then I withdraw my nomination this DR. Feel free to vote for deletion if I missed anything, --Achim55 (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @SpooksBGone I've restored it to the article. Doug Weller (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and best wishes again for your recovery. Hope you take some time to walk the dog and recover. SpooksBGone (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's very kind. Sadly there is no recovery. But I'm still ok, planning to perservere. Doug Weller (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Perseverantia" was the Latin motto of Solihull School ;-). God bless. [1] SpooksBGone (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- In Solihull near Birmingham? Doug Weller (talk) 21:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Perseverantia" was the Latin motto of Solihull School ;-). God bless. [1] SpooksBGone (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's very kind. Sadly there is no recovery. But I'm still ok, planning to perservere. Doug Weller (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and best wishes again for your recovery. Hope you take some time to walk the dog and recover. SpooksBGone (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @SpooksBGone I've restored it to the article. Doug Weller (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fine, thank you. Then I withdraw my nomination this DR. Feel free to vote for deletion if I missed anything, --Achim55 (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Achim55 That's a blast from the past. I remember seeing that when O'Brien's article was first created by a fringe editor (and later sockmaster) and i ran across that page. Doug Weller (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, the actual (historical) Batangas flag has a wider white field. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The rationale was ignored. The file depicts a ahistorical version of the flag. The horizontal bars of the Batangas flag are not equal in size similar to the Flag of Crimea. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 00:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Still COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is the instance above while close to a historical flag is wrong and not just of "poor quality". File:Ph Flag of Batangas.svg is the proper version Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- For disclosure I have now phased out any instance of the file's usage of throughout all Wikiproject pages. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is the instance above while close to a historical flag is wrong and not just of "poor quality". File:Ph Flag of Batangas.svg is the proper version Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess there's a time lag that explains why it's still listed as being in use in the Tagalog Wikipedia article about Miss Universe Philippines 2023? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Already phased out that one last instance. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not when I posted. Next time, take care of that before requesting deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; no longer in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
žádám o odstranění, jakožto autor Jachympe (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives without author permission Yann (talk) 10:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload; @Jachymple/IP-addr: Please see Commons:License revocation. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Já, držitel autorských práv k tomuto dílu, žádám o jeho odstranění. Jachympe (talk) 16:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This photograph is in use on a Wikipedia page. Feel free to re-nominate with an evidence-based rationale or better case for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives without author permission Yann (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload; @Jachymple/IP-addr: Please see Commons:License revocation. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives of the Slaný museum without permission Yann (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload; see also Commons:License revocation. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives of the Slaný museum without permission Yann (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload; see also Commons:License revocation. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives of the Slaný museum without permission Yann (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload; see also Commons:License revocation. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: photo by Mathias Broesicke ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep See File:Christiane Wiesenfeldt.jpg too.
- Given two photographs of the same subject years apart, with the same name in the image metadata and uploaded from the same anonymous account on Wikipedia, the far more likely scenario is that this is the real name of the account holder here. That's entirely legit, although the nominator here might want to read our policy on COM:OUTING.
- de:Spezial:Beiträge/MuWiFan for convenience, although it doesn't give much more information. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per user:Andy Dingley, COM:AGF. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://semnan.ac.ir/gallery/%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%B1%DA%A9%D8%B2%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%B3%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86 © کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به دانشگاه سمنان است. ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Photographed by Tom Healy, September 15, 2019. http://photos.greatrails.net/s/?p=253043 ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Grey D fashion shoot https://thegioidienanh.vn/grey-d-la-nam-ca-si-viet-nam-duoc-nghe-nhieu-nhat-nam-2023-tren-spotify-74324.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://lostfilm.info/photo_actor/408853/102483/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Alexander Lisowski ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Natalia Batista
[edit]- File:Natalia Batista, Göteborg 2013.jpg
- File:Natalia Batista, Göteborg 2013 (2).jpg
- File:Natalia Batista, Göteborg 2013 (2) (cropped).jpg
- File:Natalia Batista 2019 (P1020009).jpg
- File:Natalia Batista 2019 (P1020010).jpg
- File:Natalia Batista 2019 (P1020011).jpg
Files not in use. Courtesy deletion request, as the photographed person doesn't like them. I (the uploader) have contacted her, hoping she will add her voice to the discussion. There are other photos that can be used instead. --Paracel63 (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion, per F1. This picture is used on his LinkedIn profile... Lofhi (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Now https://greypopart.com/ has « Copyright 2011 - 2024 GREY POP ART - All rights reserved ; Images on the site are freely usable under the Creative Commons Paternité-Share of Initial Conditions to the Identic 3.0 Unported or compatible license. ».
- The picture (cropped) is on the About page of this website, so looks good to me. Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Shimanto1
[edit]- File:Lijnennetkaart Zeeland.pdf
- File:OSB network map.png
- File:Rail Map Luxemburg.png
- File:Track diagram London Bridge.png
- File:Track diagram London Bridge2.png
- File:Wroclaw Tram Network.png
Possible CopyVio. Files are tagged as {{Own}} work, but are marked with the logo of Artsfoh Utrecht which appears to be a design studio in the Netherlands. --Useddenim (talk) 22:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I am in fact Artsfoh Utrecht 2A02:A467:7429:1:4430:1AC9:9001:BD90 17:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Who? 186.172.135.192 16:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- And for the Luxembourg one, line numbers doesn't match the official number scheme. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Who? 186.172.135.192 16:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. @User:Shimanto1: Please see COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
The name will be assigned to the more appropriate image Ajznponar (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused and implausible redirect/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
質量差的图像,非常小,模糊 颐园居 (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- You could upload the better file to cover it by clicking "Upload a new version of this file" when you think its quality is poor, rather than to submit it for deletion. Besides that, it's the second time, as far as I know, that you have submitted the file for deletion here based on the same reason. (one of the first times)
As mentioned by a user of the Commons in his reply within the page, "image quality is not an acceptable reason for deletion. See COM:DP", and as such I'd like you could stop continuing your mischief like this. Thanks! 隐世高人 (talk) 17:32 11 February 2024 (UTC) - Keep all. A bulk run across many images of the PLAN, complaining of quality issues. However these images are already scarce and complaints about quality are not reasons for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
credit: Caracol Radio https://caracol.com.co/emisora/2019/05/12/cartagena/1557682462_683721.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
nonsensical description, personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://www.facebook.com/cordeonero/photos/a.602771049829106/1430762837029919/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lunfardo Producciones (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the description
- File:Fabián Marquisio en Estudios Canaima5.jpg
- File:Fabián Marquisio en Estudios Canaima.jpg
- File:Fabián Marquisio.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
not an own work, not PD, from 1970s PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
not an own work, not PD, from 1970s PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Armando Molina inaugura el edificio de la Televisión Educativa, que aloja a los canales oficiales 8 y 10.jpg
[edit]not an own work, not PD, from 1970s PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
File:President of El Salvador Artuto Armando Molina (1972) with representatives of indigetives communities. on the left Adrian Esquino Lisco.jpg
[edit]not an own work, not in PD, from 1970s PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
File:After being beating jailed and expelled to Guatemala; Duarte talks too reporters, the Bruises still evident.jpg
[edit]not PD, from 1977 PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The stadium in question was only built in 2000. As a result, and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The stadium in question was only built in 2000. As a result, and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted in the United States until February 15, 2067.
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 01. Einleitung (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 02. Rezitativ mit Chor «Im Anfange schuf Gott» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 03. Arie mit Chor «Nun schwanden von dem heiligen Strahle» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 04. Rezitativ «Und Gott machte den Firmament» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 05. Chor mit Sopransolo «Mit Staunen steht das Wunderwerk» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 06. Rezitativ «Und Gott sprach 'Es sammle sich das Wasser'» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 07. Arie «Rollend in schäumenden Wellen» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 08. Rezitativ «Und Gott sprach 'Es bringe die Erde Gras hervor'» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 09. Arie «Nun beut die Flur das frische Grün» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 10. Rezitativ «Und die himmliche Heerscharen» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 11. Chor «Stimmt an die Saiten» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 12. Rezitativ «Und Gott sprach 'Es sei'n Lichter an der Feste des Himmels'» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 13. Rezitativ «Im vollen Glanze steigt jetzt» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 14. Chor «Die Himmel erzählen die Ehre Gottes» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 15. Rezitativ «Und Gott sprach 'Es bringe das Wasser in der Fülle hervor'» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 16. Arie «Unf starkem Fittiche schwinget sich der Adler stolz» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 17. Rezitativ «Und Gott schuf große Walfische» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 18. Rezitativ «Und die Engel rührten ihr' unsterblichen Harfen» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 19. Terzett «In holder Anmut stehen» Chor mit Soli «Der Herr ist groß in seiner Macht» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 20. Rezitativ «Und Gott sprach 'Es bringe die Erde hervor lebende Geschöpfe'» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 21. Rezitativ «Gleich öffnet sich der Erde Schoß» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 22. Arie «Nun scheint in vollem Glanze der Himmel» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 23. Rezitativ «Und Gott schuf den Menschen» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 24. Arie «Mit Würd' und Hoheit angetan» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 25. Rezitativ «Und Gott sah jedes Ding» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 26. Chor «Vollendet ist das große Werk» Terzett «Zu Dir, o Herr, blickt alles auf» Chor «Vollendet ist das große Werk» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 27. Orchestereinleitung und Rezitativ «Aus Rosenwolken bricht» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 28. Duett mit Chor «Von deinen Gott', o Herr und Gott» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 29. Rezitativ «Nun ist die erste Pflicht erfüllt» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 30. Duett «Holde Gattin, dir zur Seite» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 31. Rezitativ «O glücklich Paar, und glücklich immerfort» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
- File:Joseph Haydn - Die Schöpfung - 32. Schlußchor mit Soli «Singt dem Herren alle Stimmen!» (Igor Markevitch, Berliner Philharmoniker, 1958).ogg
Prospectprospekt (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, they should not be on the US-based Commons due to the CLASSICS act. See also most files in Category:PD EU Audio. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 05:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- agree Delete SDudley (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/vojtechduda.smugmug.com
[edit]No permission from the source
- File:Olga Pechová.jpg
- File:Tereza Rumlerova.jpg
- File:Matúš Šucha.jpg
- File:Radko obereigneru.jpg
- File:Roman prochazka.jpg
- File:Jaroslava Sucha.jpg
- File:Miroslav Charvát.jpg
- File:Jan Smahaj.jpg
- File:Vyucujici Katedry psychologie FF UP.jpg
- File:Marek kolarik.jpg
- File:Lucie Viktorová.jpg
- File:Etel Smekalova.jpg
- File:Tomas Dominik.jpg
- File:Leona Jochmannova.jpg
- File:Martina friedlova.jpg
- File:Klara seitlova.jpg
- File:Studenti Katedry psychologie FF UP.jpg
- File:Romana Mazalová.jpg
- File:Miroslav Orel.jpg
- File:Daniel dostal.jpg
- File:Jaruska Suchá.png
- File:Katedra psychologie FF UP.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Files with vague claims of own work.
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 12.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 11.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 10.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 9.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 8.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 7.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 6.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 5.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 4.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 1.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 2.jpg
- File:Anatoliy Vasyanovich 3.jpg
Spinixster (talk) 02:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Shostakovich died in 1975, so his works are copyrighted in Russia until 2046.
- File:Shostakovich Symphony 6, 1.ogg
- File:Shostakovich Symphony 6, 2.ogg
- File:Shostakovich Symphony 6, 3.ogg
- File:Shostakovich; Symphony no. 5, 1.ogg
- File:Shostakovich; Symphony no. 5, 2.ogg
- File:Shostakovich; Symphony no. 5, 3.ogg
- File:Shostakovich; Symphony no. 5, 4.ogg
Prospectprospekt (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work https://sharifsuliman.medium.com/converting-your-knowledge-graph-tsv-csv-to-a-resource-description-framework-rdf-for-e3e7305519bd ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://fishki.net/4483217-kamchatskij-krab-obraz-zhizni-severnogo-giganta.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. File is in use. What does VDA mean? IronGargoyle (talk) 02:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
My mistake / threshold for VDA Sintegrity (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. See comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Luiza Santos de Andrade.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author, Logo
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bemisztászi Szerkesztőség (talk · contribs)
[edit]ooS: personal fiction
- File:BK on the map.jpg
- File:A BK Európában.jpg
- File:I. Béla király, 1963.jpg
- File:Balyszos Királyság.png
- File:I. Béla 1957.jpg
- File:Kleopátra királyné.jpg
- File:A Balyszos Királyság címere.png
Enyavar (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bemisztászi Szerkesztőség (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Several of their recent uploads were deleted as copyvios. These claim to be own work but some have no metadata and various sizes, so considering their recent deleted files, that claim is dubious.
- File:Balyszos Béla signature.png
- File:Lippó nagyharang.jpg
- File:Középharang.jpg
- File:Lippó kisharang.jpg
- File:Lippó róm. kat.jpg
- File:A templom a kereszttel.jpg
- File:A templom csillárja.jpg
- File:Világháborús emlékmű a templom előtt.jpg
- File:Az új középharang beemelésekor 1991-ben.jpg
- File:A templom egy régi képeslapon.jpg
- File:A katolikus templom belseje.jpg
- File:Mária Bemutatása Templom.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- File:Balyszos Béla signature.png is not copyrightable, but what can "own work" mean here? How can someone else's signature be your own work? - Jmabel ! talk 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- File:A templom egy régi képeslapon.jpg is obviously not own work, but it could be in the public domain depending on the date and place of creation and publication. Other files may be own works, but more information would be useful. Yann (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- File:A templom egy régi képeslapon.jpg still has that huge watermark, even if it were PD-old it is unusable. Delete per Commons:PCP. --Enyavar (talk) 09:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (In a quick look I didn't see anything worth worrying about keeping - the signature is unused, and the possibly old images lack verifiable information and have huge ugly watermarks.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
CC licence was revoked for this photo, see disruptionlab.org/photos#borders-of-fear - "Photos licenced CC BY-SA 4.0 except photos of Sally Hayden." Vodiak Diskobox (talk) 09:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep On 23 August 2023, one day after you uploaded this, the site said "All photos are licensed CC BY-SA 4.0", and CC license declarations are irrevocable. That being said, if we want to maintain cordial relations with Disruption Lab or Jan Petersmann, we could offer to delete this upon receipt of a replacement free image of Sally Hayden. Until then, we are under no obligation to delete. —holly {chat} 18:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion request: according to the ticket, the subject did not give consent to the photographer for publish the picture under free licence. Other portraits are available in the category, but we were also offered a new one, if we need. Bencemac (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It is up to the copyright holder, not up to the subject which license is granted. As the image is still available at the source page, we should assume that permissions for both: making the photo and its publication have been either granted or not needed. Also, the image is used: this excludes courtesy deletion unless we have an accepted replacement photo. Ankry (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, (and request replacement), AGF from subject of photo, that the photographer did not seek (adequate) consent, or explain CC nature of photograph, given that a replacement is being offered. -Bogger (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a nice portrait in use across multiple projects. A replacement is promised, but this remains the only image in Category:Sally Hayden. Photograph is of a high-profile journalist, taken in a public space where she is clearly aware she is being photographed. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The photo is used.Courtesy deletion applies to unused content only. --Ankry (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion request in ticket:2024032110006172. The photo is now unused (replaced with a better quality photo) Ankry (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, alternatives are now available. -Bogger (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
since this recording was published in 1959, it would be copyrighted in the United States until 15 Feb. 2067, according to COM:HIRTLE.
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 1- Miniature Overture.ogg
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 3- Dance Of The Sugar Plum Fairies.ogg
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 4- Trepak- Russian Dance.ogg
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 5- Arab Dance.ogg
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 6- Chinese Dance.ogg
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 7- Dance Of The Mirlitons.ogg
- File:Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Nutcracker Suite- 8- Waltz Of The Flowers.ogg
Prospectprospekt (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Since this sound recording was published in 1948, it will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2059. Prospectprospekt (talk) 03:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Random computer model of Paris, I don't see much educational value here A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Character of Daffy Duck is still under copyright, so this may not be on Commons until 2033. 212.117.1.186 10:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I made this deletion request through that IP account. Sorry, mistakes happen. Sudoviaball (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Public domain cartoon. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Just because the cartoon is in the public domain doesn't mean it's eligible for hosting on Commons. The cartoon features the character of Daffy Duck, who first appeared in the 1937 short "Porky's Duck Hunt," which is still under copyright. This means that for the "Daffy Duck and the Dinosaur" cartoon to be hosted on Commons, we need to wait for "Porky's Duck Hunt" to enter the public domain as well. For more information, see COM:CHAR. Sudoviaball (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The displayed art of the alive artist is not permanently installed, thus freedom of panorama doesn't apply. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ik heb deze foto zelf gemaakt. Het betreft een foto in een openbare plaats (vrij toegankelijke expositieruimte van de stad Roeselare), waar "toevallig" een expositie van Kristof Santy liep. Ik heb bewust zijdelings gefotografeerd, zodat ik geen rechte foto van de werken heb gemaakt en ze er "incidenteel" op te zien zijn. Ook in de beschrijving staat niets vermeld van Kristof Santy, maar enkel van de publieke plaats Ter Posterie. De incidentele weergave van werken in een publieke plaats, zelfs als ze er niet permanent staan, vindt zijn toepassing in Art. XI 190,2° WER: "Wanneer het werk op geoorloofde wijze openbaar is gemaakt,kan de auteur zich niet verzetten tegen:de reproductie en de mededeling aan het publiek van een werk tentoongesteld in een voor het publiek toegankelijke plaats, wanneer het doel van de reproductie of van de mededeling aan het publiek niet het werk zelf is.” Of een werk al dan niet het hoofddoel uitmaakt van een reproductie of mededeling,wordt overgelaten aan het oordeel van de kennisnemende rechter.
- Nu concreet: ik heb deze foto gemaakt op vraag van de kunstenaar zelf, die graag een foto op zijn wikipedia-pagina had. Daarvoor heb ik bewust deze incidentaire positie gekozen. Op welke wijze kan ik de toestemming van de kunstenaar voor het gebruik van deze foto vragen ? Lacuna Leemte (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Je verwijst nu naar de minimis, echter lijken de schilderijen mij toch het hoofdonderwerp van de foto te zijn. Voor het laatste: zie Commons:Email templates voor vrijgaveformulieren. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Flickr uploader is not the photographer: " foto miguel arana [www.es.amnesty.org/quienes-somos/los-origenes]/". I don't see a CC license on Amnesty Espana's site.. Abzeronow (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- File:Peter Benenson (cropped).jpg would also be affected. Abzeronow (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal files
- File:סמליל יקירת מיזם האבולוציה לשנת 2023.png
- File:סמליל יקיר מיזם האבולוציה לשנת 2023.png
- File:מיזם האבולוציה – סמליל גבול לבן עם טקסט.png
- File:מיזם האבולוציה – סמליל רקע לבן עם טקסט.png
- File:מיזם האבולוציה – סמליל גבול לבן ללא טקסט.png
- File:מיזם האבולוציה – סמליל רקע שקוף ללא טקסט.png
- File:מיזם האבולוציה – סמליל מלא ללא טקסט.png
- File:מיזם האבולוציה – סמליל רקע לבן ללא טקסט.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy, These files are from WikiProject Evolution... Keep · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 17:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- They don't seem useful and could have been reduced to just two images using the revision system (uploading a new version on top). So merging them would be good. Some of them are in use. --Prototyperspective (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I will note none of them were in use when I nominated them, as far as I can recall. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: those not in use; Kept those currently in use (no prejudging relising in future). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
El archivo fue plagiado de la pagina de la alcaldía de Ibagué: https://ibague.gov.co/portal/seccion/noticias/index.php?idnt=4291#gsc.tab=0 La imagen contiene derechos de autor Enhuera (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:SIG UK, subject died in 1999 so not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. While Dusty Springfield was a UK citizen, the country of origin would be where this signature was first published. That would be the US because the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame is a US institution. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Java category low quality files
[edit]- File:"Image02".png
- File:"Image03".png
- File:"Image04".png
- File:"Image06".png
- File:"Image07".png
- File:"Image09".png
- File:"Image10".png
- File:"Image11".png
- File:"Image13".png
- File:"Image14".png
- File:"Image15".png
Low quality files, do not contain description, are not used. In my opinion they are useless --Architekt1024 (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC) I didn't notice that the description was from right to left Architekt1024 (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. These are all images of text which look like they were scanned from a book. Likely copyright violation; even if not, they don't need to be images, and they aren't useful without context. Omphalographer (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:"Image04".png as it is in use and not sufficiently creative to be copyrighted. I don't know enough about Javascript to comment on the usefulness of the rest. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- We can keep this file if used. However, it is terribly general and can be used in most programming language article. I would move it to a more general category. Architekt1024 (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The remaining image can be replaced with plaintext; when this is done it can be speedied. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fatihkulat as Speedy (Sil) Yann (talk) 10:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- His wedding photo from 1931. See Cumhuriyet and Ulus newpapers in a library. PD. Keep. Dahiyane (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of PD status. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't think, postcards from 1969 are copyright free ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of PD status. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. While Hurley is a UK citizen, the source states that the "Country/Region of Manufacture" was the United States. Publication location (or creation location in the absence of publication) is what determines country of origin. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Chris O'Dowd is an Irish citizen (not UK as suggested here). Nevertheless, according to the source, this was "signed in-person at the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah on January 19, 2014." As this signature was produced in the US and presumably not published elsewhere, it would be a US work. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 04:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Simple text-based list of bus stops. Nothing sufficiently creative to attract copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. Mostly text, any copyrightable elements are de minimis. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 羅沙路 Luosha Lu 蓮塘口岸 Liantang Port Checkpoint mall July 2023 Px3 21.jpg
[edit]COM:TOYS Solomon203 (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Individual toys here are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Assuming that this is a sound recording that was published in 1925, this will enter the public domain on January 1, 2026, per COM:HIRTLE. Prospectprospekt (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I thought music copyright was 95 years? 149.88.16.34 17:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Sound Recordings from 1923 to 1946 have 100 year protection terms per Music Modernization Act. Music compositions are 95 years, but sound recordings from 1924 to 1928 are still protected. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Le Corbusier (died in 1965) and Pierre Jeanneret (died in 1967)
- File:Immeuble molitor 00.JPG
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (26803823344).jpg
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (27313891952).jpg
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (27412043205).jpg
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (27412043725).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor
[edit]These are some of the more elaborate interior architecture of the building. As France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama, these images infringe the posthumous copyright held by Le Corbusier's heirs, or heirs of the furniture and fixture designers.
- File:Immeuble molitor 01 atrio.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 02.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 03.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 04.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 07.1.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 07.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 08.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 09.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 11.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 12.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 14.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 16.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 17.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would save at least 08, 09, 14 and 17 as they show quite generic details or furniture under Commons:UA. --Sailko (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Sailko the #14 one is problematic. We see the relatively-artistic curved wall. I suspect it is also under Le Corbusier's authorship. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. I'm not sure I agree that images 08, 09, 14 or 17 should be saved as they all show off the architecture. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: most as they show distinctive enough architecture. 14 and 17 show that too. Kept 8 and 9 because the architecture shown is too simple for a copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor
[edit]No FoP in France. The architect Le Corbusier died in 1965. France knows a standard of life + 70 years and I suggest to undelete in 2036.
- File:Immeuble molitor 05.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 06.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 10.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 13.JPG
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary, since this file exists. Sudoviaball (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The tinting in it is different, so I don't believe the file is unnecessary. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives without author permission Yann (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives of the Slaný museum without permission Yann (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This file is a screenshot from a USC Shoah Foundation interview with survivor John Langwell. I also request to delete the file. Asser5784 (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is in the public domain, so there is no ground on copyright for deletion. I fixed the date, source, author, and license. However it is so small, that it is unusable as it is. The original image should be uploaded instead. Yann (talk) 07:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Yann, too small to be usuable. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives of the Kladno hospital without permission Yann (talk) 11:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.71.213.51 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: photo from the archives of the Kladno hospital without permission Yann (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Uhai as Logo (https://www.discogs.com/de/label/142249-In-Takt-Records?sort=artist&sort_order=asc&page=1) Yann (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann Why doesn't this qualify for speedy? Uhai (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- {{PD-textlogo}}? May or may not be OK, depending on the country or origin. Yann (talk) 11:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This appears to be the logo for the Bosnian record label In Takt Records, which was deleted for being a blatant advertisement on English Wikipedia. It is unrelated to Intakt Records which seems to be a notable Swiss record label. We have little information on Bosnian threshold of originality, and this seems out of scope anyway. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per IronGargoyle, could be above Bosnian ToO and appears to be out of scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The picture cannot be found in the book quoted. This object has been known only recently and published in 2011. Most likely taken from here:https://www.schoyencollection.com/history-collection-introduction/babylonian-history-collection/tower-babel-stele-ms-2063 Licence not valid for Commons. Zunkir (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The picture cannot be found in the book quoted and was mot likely not made by R. Koldewey. This object has been known only recently and published in 2011. Most likely taken from here:https://www.schoyencollection.com/history-collection-introduction/babylonian-history-collection/tower-babel-stele-ms-2063 The original picture can be found here https://www.schoyencollection.com/media/djcatalog2/images/tower-babel-stele-ms-2063.1_f.jpg with further elements that allow to identify the original authors, including A. George who is alive. Licence not valid for Commons. Zunkir (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Files from Congregation of Sisters of St. Joseph in Canada
[edit]Each of the following files was separately nominated for deletion. They present essentially the same issues, and they will probably all need to be deleted. I see no need for 72 separate discussions. [now over 100, because the user did not stop making individual nominations, despite two of us telling her to stop. Clearly well intentioned, but creating massive chaos.]
These files were all uploaded to the Flickr stream Congregation of Sisters of St. Joseph in Canada and marked as public domain. They have since been deleted from that stream because User:Marygk86, the archivist maintaining that account, realized that they are not in the public domain. There may be some subtlelties to be worked out about exact dates (it may matter which images were published and which merely archived) but because they are (I think uniformly) from unknown photographers, they will be problematic whether they will be published or not: if they were published in Canada after 1945, then they had U.S. right restored by the URAA in 1996, and will be copyrighted in the U.S. at least until 2040, and longer if their publication date was later. If they were not published in anything like a timely manner, then their rights will extend in the U.S. until 120 years from creation. So these will all have to be deleted.
- Jmabel ! talk 00:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC), more files added. Jmabel ! talk 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I believe the following two files were inadvertently included in the set of nominations, and should be handled in their original separate nominations:
- File:Windermere on the Mount - London, ON 6-07-17 2-56-47 PM.jpg
- File:Windermere on the Mount - London, ON 6-07-17 2-46-25 PM.jpg
Jmabel ! talk 01:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) The former file‘s DR was already withdrawn by the nominator, then closed by Abzeronow.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Jmabel. You have succinctly summarized the problem. I have stopped putting in nominations for deletion but there are still some remaining images in Wikimedia that are problematic. Thank you again. Marygk86 (talk) 00:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I see you had commented on one of these, might want to continue discussion here. - Jmabel ! talk 01:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that is correct.
- These two files are not from our archives and were incorrectly nominated for deletion. Marygk86 (talk) 01:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Presumably keep those two. - Jmabel ! talk 05:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes please. Marygk86 (talk) 15:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Presumably keep those two. - Jmabel ! talk 05:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
@Abzeronow: I believe you also commented on one of these elsewhere, so I wanted to draw your attention to the centralized discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 01:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Can't they release them under a Creative Commons license? It seems that almost every image at Flickr Commons, the archive releasing them is not the creator or copyright holder. --RAN (talk) 02:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @RAN: Which is fine if the photos were systematically donated, with proper forms filled out to transfer the copyright, but in this case they don't even know who took the photos, so they have no way to obtain those rights even for themselves. - Jmabel ! talk 05:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is correct. Marygk86 (talk) 15:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @RAN: Which is fine if the photos were systematically donated, with proper forms filled out to transfer the copyright, but in this case they don't even know who took the photos, so they have no way to obtain those rights even for themselves. - Jmabel ! talk 05:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping, Jmabel. Definitely a mess, but less so now that there is a centralized discussion of it. We may have to follow the 120 year rule on these photographs since we don't have any clue on who the proper authors are, and these may have been never published (US had looser rules, but Canada was a Berne signatory in the 1920s so date of publication would matter too). Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
@Marygk86: because publication dates matter for when these can be undeleted, were the uploads to Flickr the first publication for all of these? Did any have prior publication? And what was the (at least approximate) date of the uploads to Flickr? Once we know that, we can strategize how to group these so we know when each can be undeleted. - Jmabel ! talk 05:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The uploads to Flickr and to History Pin took place at the same time for most of these images which was approximately 2014. However, there were some images uploaded after this date to Flickr as well. All of these images have been deleted from History Pin and Flickr in February 2024 when we realized they did not comply with a public domain license. I am uncertain when images were uploaded after 2014, but there were other uploads to Flickr between 2014-2023. I'm sorry I can't be more precise, but I have identified all the problematic images with the nomination to delete requests apart from three remaining images. Marygk86 (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- At Commons we have been following US case law and applying it worldwide. We have been applying Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. to images that originate in countries that do not recognized the US ruling. US case law has ruled that an image is "made public" when it leaves the custody of the photographer, not just appearing in a newspaper or magazine. If these images left the custody of the photographer and was given to one of the sitters or the organization, they were made public at that point. --RAN (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Do you agree with what RAN wrote immediately above (about applying Bridgeman v. Corel outside the U.S.)? That would be news to me. - Jmabel ! talk 20:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- See: w:National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute where the WMF applies Bridgeman to images originating in the United Kingdom against their wishes. The UK only adopted the Bridgeman-like rule in THJ v. Sheridan in 2023. --RAN (talk) 20:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp is about photos of paintings, and the threshold of originality -- i.e. the {{PD-Art}} template. While we do use that logic worldwide, I don't see how that is relevant here. In terms of publication, giving out copies to friends, with no restrictions on further use, could constitute general publication by the U.S. definition, yes. We don't follow that definition worldwide, but would use it when the question is U.S. copyright status, and publication without notice. It may be reasonable to assume publication upon the transfer of the items to the Congregation of Sisters of St. Joseph, if not earlier. U.S. circuit decisions are not uniform on this, but the Copyright Compendium does say Generally, a limited publication is the distribution of copies of a work to a definitely selected group with a limited purpose and without the right of diffusion, reproduction, distribution, or sale. A limited publication is not considered a distribution to the public and, therefore, is not publication. [...] Giving away copies of a photograph without further restriction constitutes publication of that work. That is from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Found photos from the Thomas Hawk collection. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg touches on that, and some other aspects. If the only reason for deletion is the uncertainty of U.S. publication, and it's reasonable to assume works were published before 1989, then they may be OK. Obviously, any Canadian photograph from 1946 or later is not OK, since those would have been restored by the URAA and would still be under U.S. copyright for 95 years from publication. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same r Marygk86 (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. Taken in 1953. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same re Marygk86 (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. Taken in 1953.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same r Marygk86 (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Canadian image from 2007 retained here with "no known copyright restrictions." However, it must either be a photograph with a known photographer protected for life +70 or an anonymous photograph protected for publication +75 years. It won't be PD for at least 53 years and there is no evidence of a free licence. From Hill To Shore (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. Taken in 1955.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Where are you getting 1955 from? This was taken in 1946 according to the file description. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same Marygk86 (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain.The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. Taken in 1950. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same rea Marygk86 (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep after cropping this so it only includes the 1930 photograph, which can be kept per {{PD-Canada}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain. The photographer was unknown for these photographs, but they are not pre-1949 and so under Canadian law, are not in the public domain. I have removed these images from both our Flickr Commons and History Pin sites for that reason, and they should be removed from Wikimedia Commons. for the same reas Marygk86 (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploader was born in 1950. The displayed subject, the father, died in 1966. Serious doubt if these images were made by the uploader, who passed away in 2015.
- File:Thom de Klerk bassoonist 1912-1966.png
- File:Thom de Klerk conducts NWE.png
- File:Thom de Klerk makes reeds.png
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Attribution fixed. --RAN (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Could you provide sources that indicate that the authors of these works are anonymous? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies to 1950 photos. Undelete in 2046. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission. This is wrong as the video is licensed under CC-BY on Youtube. — Dudek1337 (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: It is freely licensed by the soccer club on YouTube. License reviewed. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
error same as File:Commission scientifique du Nord - A. Mayer - Tour de l'église de Ballerup.jpg Newnewlaw (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Le Corbusier, the architect, died in 1965. No FOP in France. The files may be moved to the French Wikipedia under the following condition : « L'importation sur la Wikipédia francophone de photographies libres de bâtiments récents est tolérée. Cependant, l'importation est interdite dans les cas où les ayants droit ont explicitement exprimé leur opposition. »
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 1.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 10.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 2.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 3.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 4.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 5.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 8.JPG
- File:Inside the Cathedral at Couvent de La Tourette.jpg
- File:La Tourette 4.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 21:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Interior architecture as well as some exteriors of a building still under Le Corbusier's posthumous copyright. France does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama. The old images are from Pierre Varga, not from Corbusier, so invalid P.D. or copyright-free licenses too.
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 7.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette Refectoire 2.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Eglise 2.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieur 1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieure 1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieure 2.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieure 4.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Interieur 1.jpg
- File:DJI 20230314114205 0013 Z copie.jpg
- File:Domonkos kolostor (Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette). Építészek- Le Corbusier, Iannis Xenakis, André Wogenscky és Pierre Jeanneret. Fortepan 58028.jpg
- File:Domonkos kolostor (Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette). Építészek- Le Corbusier, Iannis Xenakis, André Wogenscky és Pierre Jeanneret. Fortepan 58029.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I get the issue from now through 2035 on Le Corbusier, but why exactly are you saying the CC license is invalid, once the building's copyright expires? - Jmabel ! talk 20:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel the invalid license is for the old images like File:Domonkos kolostor (Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette). Építészek- Le Corbusier, Iannis Xenakis, André Wogenscky és Pierre Jeanneret. Fortepan 58029.jpg. While the photographer/s have released the images under suitable licenses, the old images are still derivatives of the copyrighted Le Corbusier's work and there is no indication that the photographers had the blessing from the architect or his heirs in the use of licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. So these would also become OK in 2036; you are not questioning their licenses, just saying that as derivative works they can't waive the underlying copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 23:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 This Link shows https://archleague.org/article/presence-and-weight-in-european-architecture/ that the author is Pierre Varga. Photo on Fortepan: https://fortepan.hu/hu/photos/?donor=Pierre%20Varga Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann no, he was only the photographer of the Flickr image. But read the caption again. Architect Le Corbusier is mentioned in the caption. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel the invalid license is for the old images like File:Domonkos kolostor (Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette). Építészek- Le Corbusier, Iannis Xenakis, André Wogenscky és Pierre Jeanneret. Fortepan 58029.jpg. While the photographer/s have released the images under suitable licenses, the old images are still derivatives of the copyrighted Le Corbusier's work and there is no indication that the photographers had the blessing from the architect or his heirs in the use of licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 What I don´t understand is that some images, labeled here for deletion, are subjected to Le Corbusier's posthumous copyright, and others, even from the same photographer, are not. Why do the slip through the "observation - net" especially the one exterior shot of the Couvent in the infobox??? Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 in my today´s comment, I didn´t mean the b/w photo in the infobox but the coloured one on the Wikipedia page. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sainte-Marie_de_la_Tourette#/media/Datei:La_tourette-_arq._Le_Corbusier.jpg Why is this no infringement of copyright? Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann kindly look at the details of the image at German Wikipedia (w:de:Datei:La tourette- arq. Le Corbusier.jpg), and do not rely on media viewer. German Wikipedia locally accepts images of copyrighted works of art and architecture from countries with no FoP, by applying German FoP which allows commercial uses of public art and architecture. Here in Commons, however, a certain landmark must be freely usable in its country of origin for the work to be accepted here. But since France does not allow commercial FoP, this building is technically not OK for hosting here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Thank you, for the details, which means that all interior pic´s must be deleted (according to German law for German Wikipedia). But how about the photos of User: "Flibust1er". One of his exterior shots has to go (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieur_1.jpg), another one can stay (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieure_3.jpg) ??? Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann #3, in my opinion, only shows a negligible element of architecture, as opposed to #1, which shows a substantial part of the Corbusier-type exterior. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Here we are within the realm of interpretation of to what extent a part of a building or it´s detail ist substantial or not. As an architect I know that L.C. would get upset about this kind of attitude. O.K. thanks again and let´s hope for a unified strategy of FoP at least for the EU... Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann unfortunately, unless French law is changed, nothing will change. Not even EU, as the EU itself is disorganized in terms of copyright debates. Do not expect that the public space of France will be liberated from the chains of anti-FoP groups and individuals of that country, especially ADAGP which is a known critic of Wikimedia community, anytime soon. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Oh, no, again what learned, this is an absolute "mission impossible": https://www.adagp.fr/en/adagp-role-and-missions/adagp-general-presentation/missions Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann here is ADAGP's presentation to the EU Parliament in 2015 during FoP discourse, criticizing proposals for mandatory commercial FoP throughout the EU. They also took a swipe at Wikimedia (for them, Wikipedia and Wikimedia are just one and same because all the people who constitute it, like us, form a single community), criticizing our use of free-culture licensing to images of copyrighted public landmarks. They also seem to be critical to Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and Flickr too. They only praised YouTube, which has royalty arrangements to them and other artists' collectivities, so I assume Google (whose parent company owns YouTube) is the only compliant American Internet company that complies with no-FoP countries for having licensing arrangements with ADAGP and other groups representing architects and sculptors. I assume that extends to Google Street View too; any way, GSV imagery are not under commercial licenses, so their non-incidental depictions of public landmarks are legal in France and other 100+ no-FoP countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Thank you very much for the annoying details. I still have another question: how can I upload images on (German) Wikipedia. The upload manager ("dont upload here") always leads me to Wikimedia Commons. Therefore my files about La Tourette most probably will be deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kloster_La_Tourette_,_1997._4.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kloster_La_Tourette,_1997._5.jpg Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann here is ADAGP's presentation to the EU Parliament in 2015 during FoP discourse, criticizing proposals for mandatory commercial FoP throughout the EU. They also took a swipe at Wikimedia (for them, Wikipedia and Wikimedia are just one and same because all the people who constitute it, like us, form a single community), criticizing our use of free-culture licensing to images of copyrighted public landmarks. They also seem to be critical to Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and Flickr too. They only praised YouTube, which has royalty arrangements to them and other artists' collectivities, so I assume Google (whose parent company owns YouTube) is the only compliant American Internet company that complies with no-FoP countries for having licensing arrangements with ADAGP and other groups representing architects and sculptors. I assume that extends to Google Street View too; any way, GSV imagery are not under commercial licenses, so their non-incidental depictions of public landmarks are legal in France and other 100+ no-FoP countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Oh, no, again what learned, this is an absolute "mission impossible": https://www.adagp.fr/en/adagp-role-and-missions/adagp-general-presentation/missions Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann unfortunately, unless French law is changed, nothing will change. Not even EU, as the EU itself is disorganized in terms of copyright debates. Do not expect that the public space of France will be liberated from the chains of anti-FoP groups and individuals of that country, especially ADAGP which is a known critic of Wikimedia community, anytime soon. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Here we are within the realm of interpretation of to what extent a part of a building or it´s detail ist substantial or not. As an architect I know that L.C. would get upset about this kind of attitude. O.K. thanks again and let´s hope for a unified strategy of FoP at least for the EU... Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann #3, in my opinion, only shows a negligible element of architecture, as opposed to #1, which shows a substantial part of the Corbusier-type exterior. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Thank you, for the details, which means that all interior pic´s must be deleted (according to German law for German Wikipedia). But how about the photos of User: "Flibust1er". One of his exterior shots has to go (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieur_1.jpg), another one can stay (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieure_3.jpg) ??? Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- German Wikipedia only respects German copyright law, and not laws of France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Das ist natürlich völlig richtig. Das Foto ist auch nur dort gelandet, weil ich (irgendwo?) gelesen habe, dass auf WIKIPEDIA hochgeladene Fotos davon ausgenommen sind, wie z.B. das Flickr Foto: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:La_tourette-_arq._Le_Corbusier.jpg aus dem Jahr 2007. Auf WIKIPEDIA hochladen geht aber wohl nicht mehr. Was auch nicht mehr geht (Ausschluss kommerzieller Nutzung), ist die Lizensierung nach: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Deed | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic | Creative Commons, denn jetzt kann alles was auf Commons existiert auch kommerziell genutzt werden. Genau diese Absicht hat aber nie die Person, die hochlädt, denn die will ja, dass das Werk von allen genutzt werden kann, je nach individueller Lizenzierung.
- Immer wieder ist zu lesen, dass es in Frankreich keine Panoramafreiheit gibt, was nach dem Gesetzestext von 2016 ja so nicht stimmt: "Natürlichen Personen, ohne kommerziellen Hintergrund, ist es erlaubt, Werke der plastischen Kunst und der Baukunst zu vervielfältigen, wenn sie dauerhaft öffentlich sichtbar sind." Sollte dieser juristische Kommentar (für Frankreich) richtig sein - wovon ich ausgehe - habe ich (und andere) mit dem Hochladen eines Fotos (das von La Tourette hier ist übrigens aus dem Jahr 1997!) keine Gewinnerzielungsabsicht und bewege mich daher im legalen Bereich des code de la propriété intellectuelle (CPI). Die "Darstellung" (Präsentation) auf Commons ist aber m.E. genau die “(représentation), die im französischen Urheberrecht die öffentliche Wiedergabe bezeichnet, einschließlich der Aufführung, Vorführung, Sendung, Ausstrahlung und öffentlichen Zugänglichmachung über das Internet (vgl. Art. L.122-2 CPI)". Demnach würde für Frankreich dasselbe gelten, wie für Deutschland: Panoramafreiheit geht vor Urheberrecht und weil wir nicht wie in den social Media einem Austauschgeschäft unterliegen (kostenloser Zugang versus Content), gibt es nur eine Erklärung, die Löschung von Fotos, etc. aus welchen Gründen auch immer, dient 1.) dem Schutz der Urheber und 2.) dem Schutz der Organisation von Wikimedia Commons. Wenn das so wäre, lässt sich das nicht ändern, weshalb mein Foto dann aber nicht wegen der gesetzlichen franz. Regelung gelöscht (Panoramafreiheit/Urheberrecht) werden müsste, sondern zum Schutz von Wikimedia Commons vor rechtlichen Auseinandersetzungen. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 16:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann kindly look at the details of the image at German Wikipedia (w:de:Datei:La tourette- arq. Le Corbusier.jpg), and do not rely on media viewer. German Wikipedia locally accepts images of copyrighted works of art and architecture from countries with no FoP, by applying German FoP which allows commercial uses of public art and architecture. Here in Commons, however, a certain landmark must be freely usable in its country of origin for the work to be accepted here. But since France does not allow commercial FoP, this building is technically not OK for hosting here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 My proposal to not delete the follwing files: "Couvent de la Tourette - 7.JPG" and "Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieure 1.jpg" (both substantial as construction, but not typical for the whole building) plus "Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Interieur 1.jpg The last one is totally banal, nobody would connect this image with L.C. or with the convent. On the other hand it gives an idea about the simple interior and the later added ugly installations. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Adding File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette, Fassade.jpg to the nomination. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 The photo is a cropped image of: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieure_4.jpg#file This reduction of a major part of the building, showing the concrete walls, the different kind of pilotis amd the facade, should be kept under the "de minimis" regulation. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 Additional explanation: the original image, showing too many of L.C.`s achievements https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieure_4.jpg#file can be deleted, but not my cropped version:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette,_Fassade.jpg?uselang=de Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann If you're cropping to show a design detail, wouldn't it be the opposite of de minimis? I'm honestly fine either way, but if a whole building is copyrighted, then wouldn't that apply to (non-generic) details? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 Additional explanation: the original image, showing too many of L.C.`s achievements https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieure_4.jpg#file can be deleted, but not my cropped version:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette,_Fassade.jpg?uselang=de Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030@Peter Christian Riemann the image File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette, Fassade.jpg needs a separate deletion request, IMO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 In my opinion the cropped image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette,_Fassade.jpg showing only two different facades, should not be deleted. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 The photo is a cropped image of: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_Sainte-Marie_de_La_Tourette_Exterieure_4.jpg#file This reduction of a major part of the building, showing the concrete walls, the different kind of pilotis amd the facade, should be kept under the "de minimis" regulation. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2036. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Le Corbusier died in 1965 and I suggest to undelete the files in 2036
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 11.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 12.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 6.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 9.JPG
- File:Couvent de La Tourette - Eveux.jpg
- File:Couvent de la Tourette refectoire 1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Detail 1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Eglise 1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Eglise 2.1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieure 3.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Porte.jpg
- File:Eveux - Couvent de La Tourette, Skylights of the Crypt.jpg
- File:Exkusion FH Köln 1997, Architekturstudenten auf dem Dach des Klosters La Tourette.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette 1998, Gang zur Kirche.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997, Oratorium.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997. 1.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997. 2.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997. 3.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1998, Ecke Südfassade.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1998, Schlupftür zur Kirche.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, Blick in den Innenhof, Eingangsebene (2013).jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, Krypta, 1998.jpg
- File:La Tourette Exkurion 1997.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Kirche 1997.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Loggia Betonkonstruktion, 1998.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Loggia Innenfassade, 1998.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Sections East-West, Plan + Axon.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Sichtblende, 1998.jpg
- File:Nasrine Seraji.jpg
- File:Skylights at Couvent de La Tourette.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- The argumention of User Paradise Chronicle ist contradicted: "No FoP in France" is most often used in a much too undifferenciated way. There is no need to use this argument as a "pumpgun", without taking into account that uploaded pictures - even if the work is within the 70 years limit after the death of the creator - often fulfill the legislative requirements. Those are category 1 (de minimis rule) and category 2 (incidentally taken od trivial pictures).
- The following files belong to category 1, because they are showing minor details of a building:
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 11.JPG Trivial picture
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 12.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 6.JPG
- File:Couvent de la Tourette - 9.JPG Very trivial picture
- File:Couvent de La Tourette - Eveux.jpg Trivial picture
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Detail 1.jpg Trivial picture with technical motive
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Eglise 1.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Exterieure 3.jpg
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Porte.jpg Trivial picture with technical motive
- File:Eveux - Couvent de La Tourette, Skylights of the Crypt.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette 1998, Gang zur Kirche.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997, Oratorium.jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997. 1.jpg Picture shows more or less only the silhoutte of the building
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997. 2.jpg Picture shows only fragments of the building
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1997. 3.jpg Trivial picture with technical motives (chimney, silhouette of two screens)
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1998, Ecke Südfassade.jpg Trivial picture with technical motive
- File:Kloster La Tourette, 1998, Schlupftür zur Kirche.jpg Trivial picture with technical motive
- File:Kloster La Tourette, Blick in den Innenhof, Eingangsebene (2013).jpg
- File:Kloster La Tourette, Krypta, 1998.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Kirche 1997.jpg
- File:La Tourette, Loggia Betonkonstruktion, 1998.jpg Trivial picture showing fair-faced concrete
- File:La Tourette, Loggia Innenfassade, 1998.jpg Trivial picture showing wooden closure of individual loggia
- File:La Tourette, Sichtblende, 1998.jpg Trivial picture showing technical detail óf window-screen
- File:Skylights at Couvent de La Tourette.jpg
- The following files belong to category 2, because people or motive of the "incidental snaps" are more important than the context of the building.
- File:Couvent de la Tourette refectoire 1.jpg Picture shows an art exhibition
- File:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette Eglise 2.1.jpg Picture shows an art exhibition
- File:Exkusion FH Köln 1997, Architekturstudenten auf dem Dach des Klosters La Tourette.jpg
- File:La Tourette Exkurion 1997.jpg
- File:Nasrine Seraji.jpg
- The following file was wrongly proposed for deletion, since the author of the technical drawing gave his permission to the VRT.
- Note: The court draws a distinction between depictions of a work of art, and depictions of whole settings of which the work of art is a mere part, and denies the right of the artist over such images. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- De minimis in France treats photographs in public places with several other major buildings beside one another. Here all images have only the monastery or parts of the monastery in the focus. There is no other building on the files in question of this DR for which one can claim that there no copyright for that building.
- The monastery is not situated in a public square, its a building in the countryside with no immediate neighbors.
- It's the creator who owns the copyright in France, not the owner. So it's ok for Santiago Carvajal to give away his rights, but he can not decide that Le Corbusier gives away his rights as well.
- File:La Tourette, Sections East-West, Plan + Axon.jpg for example is a copy of Le Corbusiers work by Santiago Carvajal. For the rest, the copyright belongs also to Le Corbusier. For some files such as File:Couvent de la Tourette - 11.JPG one can argue that they do not show anything specifically from Le Corbusier, but the files are still named after the Monastery and categorized in the category of the monastery. Other files show obvious elements from Le Corbusier such as the doors in an oval fashion as is also shown in another building of his. The skylights are also unique. The exterior appearances are unique as well, try to find a similar building.
- And did you maybe confuse the two categories? In your explanation above the trivial images are mentioned to be in category 2 but while not one of the files in category 2 have the description trivial, many do have the description trivial in category 1. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- De minimis in France treats photographs in public places with several other major buildings beside one another. Here all images have only the monastery or parts of the monastery in the focus. There is no other building on the files in question of this DR for which one can claim that there no copyright for that building.
- Ticket:2024042610007599 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion deleted most. I inspected all photos and decided to keep 7 files listed by User:Peter Christian Riemann as these were also de minimis. As noted small details can be copyrighted by their design. In addition the image with the VRT permission has been kept. --Ellywa (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
In addition to the customized intro and intertitles, the video only contains a short fragment of the movie. It is heavily inferior to this file, but even that file has its flaws as it has a border, a watermark and a more modern intro containing the logo of the Danish Film Institute. Sudoviaball (talk) 09:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, a short version may have its uses. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Emperor of Emperors as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation; not in public domain Yann (talk) 11:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Emperor of Emperors: , when was the painting created? I can also crop the painting out since the photograph would still be useful as a crop. Abzeronow (talk) 22:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: cropped the file and kept the version without possibly copyrighted painting and photos. --Ellywa (talk) 19:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Would no longer like to use my name openly BRKY24 (talk) 12:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @BRKY24: is it OK if I first delete/replace with text all usecases of this image on your userpage, and from various of your file-related templates? Or do you want to do this yourself? —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 19:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: file is much in use on Commons. First remove all uses and then renominate again. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
foto: personal archive https://7days.ru/caravan-collection/2018/9/katya-kmit-chapaevskiy-petka.htm (page 2) ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted photo. --Ellywa (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt
[edit]- File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt 2018 (pict2251).jpg
- File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt 2018 (pict2252).jpg
- File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt 2018 (pict2258).jpg
- File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt 2018 (pict2264).jpg
- File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt 2018 (pict2268).jpg
- File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt m fl (IMG 0570).jpg
Files not in use. Courtesy deletion request, as the photographed person doesn't want them published online. I've contacted him, hoping he will add to this discussion. These images were all uploaded by me. File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt m fl (IMG 0570).jpg seems to infringe on the privacy policy, as the people don't seem to be aware of the camera/photographer. The rest of the photos were produced while Johan Cedmar Brandstedt was on stage at a public event (the book fair in Göteborg). File:Johan Cedmar Brandstedt 2018 (pict2252).jpg may be out of scope due to low quality (blurred), and the hands are blurred generally (in all photos).--Paracel63 (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted by {{COM:COURTESY]], albeit late. In addition out of scope, person is insufficiently notable, no article currently about him on the projects, images are not in use. Can be undeleted if somebody writes an article. --Ellywa (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work https://www.mehrnews.com/news/4915298/%D9%81%D9%82%DB%8C%D9%87%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%B4-%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%81-%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%B9-%D8%A2%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B9-%D8%B4%DB%8C%D8%B9%D9%87-%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%AF ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photo does not show watermark of the agency and the name of the photographer, so not an own photo of Mehr. --Ellywa (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
source: https://tropenkoldertop15.nl/ © 2004 - 2023 Peter de With© 2004 - 2023 Peter de With ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ik ben de schrijver van het artikel, de maker van de tropenkolder top 15 en heb ook de afbeelding gemaakt Peter de With (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition out of scope and of no educational use, the article has been deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.colingreenly.com/wishbone.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This file was given to me by Laurie Zadek, the widow of Colin Greenly, who now owns the rights to his works, and the images of his works, and it was given to me with full permissions to use in this Wikipedia article. The same image can be found on www.colingreenly.com, a website that was built by and is still owned and maintained by Laurie Zadek. This image, along with the entire content of colingreenly.com is licensed as follows: CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED. If this is unsatisfactory for whatever reason, please inform me how to rectify the issue: Laurie Zadek is very happy with the Wikipedia article we have put together with her help, she and I are prepared to do whatever is required to satisfy the rules that govern the use of images at Wikimedia. Thank you. --Theodore Herman Theodoreherman (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep (all), although they will need the authorship metadata to be fixed. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Theodoreherman: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality unused image of a chemical reaction cycle with wrong format (JPG). With this image, I also nominate Átjutás.jpg due to its low quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: low quality is not a valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This was uploaded, with a CC license tag, as a work of "Bernardo Reis" by User:Williamferreiraam, the source is said to be a personal archive. So the photographer is not the uploader, but Bernardo Reis? Then where does the CC license come from? Or is Bernardo Reis the sculptor of this Christ the Redeemer statue? That would be covered by FoP-Brazil, but then who is the photographer?
There are too many unanswered questions here. Either we get a satisfactory explanation of the authorship of both photograph and statue, as well as the license tag, or the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 17:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Rosenzweig!
- The photographer is Bernardo Reis, he sent it to me and authorized me to post it
- with free rights. There is no website posted. It's his personal file.
- Sorry for any errors. Williamferreiraam (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Williamferreiraam: If that is the case, we need a confirmation and permission sent by Bernardo Reis personally, by e-mail, to Wikimedia Commons. See COM:VRT (or Commons:Volunteer Response Team/pt-br if you prefer it in Brazilian Portuguese) for details about the procedure, the text that should be used and the e-mail address where it should be sent. Who is the sculptor of the statue by the way? --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- The photographer emailed it to me with a copy to Wikipedia. I will copy the authorization content here. The builder of the work is the city of Coari. 2804:389:E03B:8C67:EF60:A435:F150:E53A 17:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Autorização Uso de Imagem"
- Eu, BERNARDO REIS afirmo por este meio que sou o criador e/ou o único detentor dos direitos autorais de Igreja_da_Matriz_de_Coari.jpg, Praça do Cristo Coari.jpg, dentre outras fotografias a William Ferreira Martins, (de ora em diante referido apenas como a "OBRA"), anexo a permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org
- (de ora em diante referido apenas como a "OBRA").
- Concordo em publicar a OBRA sob a Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição - Partilha nos Mesmos Termos 3.0 Não Adaptada (CC BY-SA 3.0).
- Declaro saber que, por meio desta licença, passo a conceder a qualquer pessoa o direito de usar a OBRA em um produto comercial, e de modificá-la de acordo com suas necessidades.
- Estou ciente de que continuarei a deter os direitos autorais da OBRA assim como o direito de ser reconhecido como o autor desta, conforme os termos da licença e outras leis aplicáveis.
- Estou ciente de que a licença livre apenas concede direitos autorais, e me reservo a opção de entrar com ação legal contra qualquer pessoa que use a OBRA em violação a quaisquer outras leis, tais como restrições a marcas registradas, difamação, ou restrições geograficamente específicas.
- Tenho conhecimento de que não poderei revogar este consentimento, e de que a OBRA poderá ou não ser mantida permanentemente em um projeto Wikimedia.
- 11 de dezembro de 2022, BERNARDO REIS.
- (de ora em diante referido apenas como a "OBRA").
- de ora em diante referido apenas como a "OBRA").
- (de ora em diante referido apenas como a "OBRA").
- "Autorização Uso de Imagem" 2804:389:E03B:8C67:EF60:A435:F150:E53A 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- De: bernardocinegrafista@gmail.com
- Para: williamferreiraam@gmail.com/ permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org 2804:389:E03B:8C67:EF60:A435:F150:E53A 17:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- The photographer emailed it to me with a copy to Wikipedia. I will copy the authorization content here. The builder of the work is the city of Coari. 2804:389:E03B:8C67:EF60:A435:F150:E53A 17:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Williamferreiraam: If that is the case, we need a confirmation and permission sent by Bernardo Reis personally, by e-mail, to Wikimedia Commons. See COM:VRT (or Commons:Volunteer Response Team/pt-br if you prefer it in Brazilian Portuguese) for details about the procedure, the text that should be used and the e-mail address where it should be sent. Who is the sculptor of the statue by the way? --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
there will be an attempt to upload this file as new version for Vietnam CT.01 Map.png[[2]], therefore this file might be unecessary Liquidrekto (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, artist of stained glass windows died in 1970, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Stained glass is washed out due to lighting and not the main focus of the image. De minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: German de minimis standards are strict, windows impact mood of photo. Undelete in 2041 --Abzeronow (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
meta data must be deleted and uploaded again M.mirzazamani (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Why? There is nothing personally identifying in the metadata. This is not a reason for deletion in any case. A new version of the file without metadata could be uploaded over this one. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback. Would you please tell me how to replace it with another photo of this book? M.mirzazamani (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
FOP issue 200.111.17.211 21:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Which mosque is this? (EDIT: found it. Sheikh Zayid Mosque.)Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sheikh Zayid Mosque was completed in 2007. Would need VRT permission from architects. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
The photo was donated by András Fodor (Q1002257)'s heirs, who died in 1997 but he unlikely owned the copyrights (he was around 11 years old at that time). Per User:Grin/fortepan.hu, the image falls under copyright. Bencemac (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded the image from a website called Fortepan. The Fortepan website has information on the use of the image:
- "The images can be published freely for any purpose with the donor designation FORTEPAN / X.Y." Netpartizán (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- As the big red warning of the category and the linked page above clearly state, Fortepan is not a trustworthy source. András Fodor and their heirs are unlikely the copyright holders as I explained above. Bencemac (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. We cannot trust the license in this case as explained. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
not PD, from 1987 PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't think that 1987 is a particularly relevant date here. What the file description seems to be arguing is that "any work by the state that has not been in use within five years of its original publication shall be in the public domain." IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, low quality image with no real educational value. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see how this has any educational value. @Tuvalkin: can you expand upon why you think it should be kept? IronGargoyle (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not identifed doesn’t mean unidentifiable. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- True, but I think the very odd, visually noisy, black-and-white character of the photo makes it less likely to be identified. It also makes it less likely to be a useful image if someone identified it. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the visually noisy, black-and-white character of the image is the whole point of it. There could however be a similar image with that aesthetic, expression and style with another motif as well as possibly more intentional – see the problematic file title for example (on the other hand, I don't know of any such). Prototyperspective (talk) 12:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly my thoughts. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think not. This is a very distinctive location with tiered terraces (there’s not many places in Portugal that look like this), and the photo technique used doesn’t obscure that. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the visually noisy, black-and-white character of the image is the whole point of it. There could however be a similar image with that aesthetic, expression and style with another motif as well as possibly more intentional – see the problematic file title for example (on the other hand, I don't know of any such). Prototyperspective (talk) 12:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- True, but I think the very odd, visually noisy, black-and-white character of the photo makes it less likely to be identified. It also makes it less likely to be a useful image if someone identified it. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Has educational use as an example of an aesthetic in photography. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ferret as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Reupload of File:Rotanev Insignia Dashboard 2024.png. User claims on Enwiki that Insignia has given permission, however the screenshot, as noted before, is of the Xbox UI which is copyrighted by Microsoft.
Converting to DR for discussion. (Shouldn't have been speedied) Abzeronow (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- [cross-posted] This file was initially tagged by Ferret as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Reupload of File:Rotanev Insignia Dashboard 2024.png. User claims on Enwiki that Insignia has given permission, however the screenshot, as noted before, is of the Xbox UI which is copyrighted by Microsoft. It is possible (but not clear) that Insignia gave an invalid license, without clearing it with Microsoft, but certainly not clear enough for a speedy deletion. The license is definitely explicitly stated on the source page. Jmabel ! talk 23:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I guess we are both thinking along the same lines, Jmabel. https://insignia.live/connect does say "All screenshots and text (including the alt-text, and FAQ section) in this guide are licenced under CC BY-SA 4.0. Please give credit to "Insignia Team", and optionally link to this page." Abzeronow (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: in fact while you were typing that, I was adding that information (and some other info) to the file page. - Jmabel ! talk 23:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I guess we are both thinking along the same lines, Jmabel. https://insignia.live/connect does say "All screenshots and text (including the alt-text, and FAQ section) in this guide are licenced under CC BY-SA 4.0. Please give credit to "Insignia Team", and optionally link to this page." Abzeronow (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyright violation, a screenshot of the Xbox UI with no indication Microsoft has released the Xbox UI under a free license. Insignia added the CC BY-SA 4.0 license note today (See wayback machine, but I verified this myself yesterday too), after the prior image was deleted yesterday. Even if Microsoft would give such a license clearance (they wouldn't), there's no way Insignia got it on such short notice. Note as well the bottom of the page: "Xbox and Xbox Live are registered trademarks of the Microsoft Corporation. Insignia is neither endorsed by nor affiliated with Microsoft." -- ferret (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Trademark and copyright are two entirely separate issues. - Jmabel ! talk 00:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's not obvious that anything here from Microsoft is over COM:TOO. It may be. The most likely candidate to exceed the threshold is the background, including the freeform drawing of an Xbox device. - Jmabel ! talk 00:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looking through Category:Xbox, I'd say we have not been terribly consistent about applying that threshold, so I will leave this with a remark that if this is deleted, someone might want to look through that category and its subcategories for other problematic files. - Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mentioning trademarks but not copyright is a failure on Insignia's part. I'm just quoting them and the lack of endorsement in particular. -- ferret (talk) 00:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I've skimmed the category, and at a glance the only critical issue was a game cover someone snuck in which is clear copyright/nfcc. -- ferret (talk) 00:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret: I was wondering about File:XboxLivelogo.png (another with an absurd claim of "own work"). If that one is OK, then this one can probably be salvaged with a Gaussian blur. - Jmabel ! talk 01:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a bit hard pressed to call the logo below TOO myself but I don't profess to be an expert there. However, I do believe the overall UI in question in this DR is well above TOO. Every component of this image is from the Xbox UI, only the "MOTD" icon and text is Insignia. You would need to blur 80% of the image. Does it serve an encyclopedic purpose at that point? I don't know if its a big concern, but Commons should probably consider the viability of hosting imagery for software that is likely seen as DMCA copyright circumvention (This tool allows your console to go around the original Microsoft supported services, similar to the famous Blizzard case against Bnetd). MS hasn't moved against Insignia, but it is what it is. -- ferret (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret: What elements other than the background (I'm including the stylized outline of a controller as part of the background) do you believe is copyrightable? - Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you're considering the 'frame' of the interface as background, then I suppose we're in agreement. Obviously the buttons are just squares with a pseudo 3D effect in the end. But all the rest is definitely above TOO, in my view. Regardless, I don't think we could accept the license claim when Insignia doesn't have the rights to make such a claim, Gaussian blur or not. Or are you saying if we blur all the TOO portions, the license doesn't matter? -- ferret (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The latter would seem to apply. If we get it below TOO, we don't need a license. - Jmabel ! talk 19:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- As a secondary consideration then, what is the educational purpose of this? To demonstrate the MOTD message that Insigna wrote? -- ferret (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea. So far we've just been dealing with a copyright issue and that is what I was addressing. @User:Urbanracer34, can you answer that last question? - Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel
- The purpose of the image is to demonstrate that Insignia is functional and that it is possible to revive the original Xbox Live service. I believe the image to be an original work made by the Insignia team, regardless of any Microsoft UI elements contained within, and I feel it is under the correct license. If that is not possible, it should fall under Fair Use. Urbanracer34 (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- We don't need an image to demonstrate that when we have reliable secondary sources saying it is so, which will make this justification difficult for NFCC on Enwiki. It's clearly not an original work, because it's literally a screenshot of the Xbox. It's a derivative work. -- ferret (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea. So far we've just been dealing with a copyright issue and that is what I was addressing. @User:Urbanracer34, can you answer that last question? - Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- As a secondary consideration then, what is the educational purpose of this? To demonstrate the MOTD message that Insigna wrote? -- ferret (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The latter would seem to apply. If we get it below TOO, we don't need a license. - Jmabel ! talk 19:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you're considering the 'frame' of the interface as background, then I suppose we're in agreement. Obviously the buttons are just squares with a pseudo 3D effect in the end. But all the rest is definitely above TOO, in my view. Regardless, I don't think we could accept the license claim when Insignia doesn't have the rights to make such a claim, Gaussian blur or not. Or are you saying if we blur all the TOO portions, the license doesn't matter? -- ferret (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret: What elements other than the background (I'm including the stylized outline of a controller as part of the background) do you believe is copyrightable? - Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a bit hard pressed to call the logo below TOO myself but I don't profess to be an expert there. However, I do believe the overall UI in question in this DR is well above TOO. Every component of this image is from the Xbox UI, only the "MOTD" icon and text is Insignia. You would need to blur 80% of the image. Does it serve an encyclopedic purpose at that point? I don't know if its a big concern, but Commons should probably consider the viability of hosting imagery for software that is likely seen as DMCA copyright circumvention (This tool allows your console to go around the original Microsoft supported services, similar to the famous Blizzard case against Bnetd). MS hasn't moved against Insignia, but it is what it is. -- ferret (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret: I was wondering about File:XboxLivelogo.png (another with an absurd claim of "own work"). If that one is OK, then this one can probably be salvaged with a Gaussian blur. - Jmabel ! talk 01:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I'll have to defer to your experience on whether blurring copyrightable material is enough for Commons, so that leaves us with the scope question: Whether or not there is a realistically useful educational purpose. -- ferret (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret It is educational. Xbox Live was down for over 10 years before Insignia came along. The work that was taken by the Insignia team is gigantic to even get the first games going on their service a couple of years back when they first started. As per the Insignia WP and their website, they have 169 games supported (and more in the pipeline to be supported) and over 9000 users registered for Insignia. Per the following link everything has been reverse engineered and made from scratch: https://kotaku.com/insignia-project-aims-to-resurrect-xbox-live-for-the-or-1843600151 The fact that it is all from scratch also highlights the effort to get this far. Urbanracer34 (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the article on Enwiki or its prose or sourcing, or whether Insignia is notable, or noteworthy, or real, or valuable or worked hard to accomplish what they did. I'm talking about whether or not this image, on its own, represents an educational purpose. -- ferret (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I feel it has an educational purpose. It shows "Insignia works." Urbanracer34 (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- But it cannot be nearly as useful for that as a solid citation of a third-party source. - Jmabel ! talk 00:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it is useful, even though it comes from Insignia themselves. It shows it exists and that it works. Urbanracer34 (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jmabel is speaking with expertise as an administrator here and on English Wikipedia (where a solid citation from a third party source is more useful than a primary source). Ultimately, I think whether or not this image is educational comes down to whether Insignia is notable (being a mod that replicates the functionality of the original Xbox Live.) Abzeronow (talk) 00:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I respect that opinion and I value it. I feel Insignia is notable because it is a reverse engineering project taking on and is of an unprecedented scale. I think when certain games (an prime example mentioned in the wikipedia article being Halo 2) gain support (We don't know when) from the Insignia Team, it will become notable overnight as more sources would take notice of Insignia and the player count on Insignia services would skyrocket. I think it is better to establish notability of Insignia now rather than months down the line. Urbanracer34 (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speaking as an English Wikipedia administrator and checkuser as well... I also believe the third party sourcing issue is most important here. The problem is, if this image was rejected by Commons, it would have to be NFCC on Enwiki. And demonstrating that "Insignia actually exists and works" through this self-produced screenshot would likely fail NFCC 8, which is that it must significantly increase reader's understanding of the topic. "Proving" Insignia actually exists isn't done with this image. Because this is a self-produced screenshot, it's a Primary source. For all any given reader knows, it's a mockup and not real. It's through the use of reliable secondary sources, third party's who have vetted Insignia, that we prove it actually exists.
- As much effort as the numerous Insignia supporters have been putting into getting this screenshot, I wish they had instead utilized the multiple reliable sources I went through the effort of finding for them to improve the article itself. Check the talk page and work on the prose. This image is no substitute for that. -- ferret (talk) 14:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I feel it meets NFCC 8 on enwiki for the same reasons you mention. If a reader thinks it's a mockup, they could easily got to the page listed in the summary and see it is in fact not. Urbanracer34 (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret: you started this out by complaining about a copyright issue that I believe my blurring addressed, which I at least thought you had acknowledged above. Separately, you raised a scope issue. If Commons deletes it on a scope basis, that in no way is a statement that it is non-free. Please state your position on this file clearly, because no one can really discuss this well with you if you keep shifting the ground. Given that you are an admin on another wiki, surely you have been on the other side of this situation. - Jmabel ! talk 03:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel Copyright is the highest issue in my view, which is where I started. In the course of the discussion, you addressed it. I then considered the question of scope and educational purpose. If you are saying scope should not be considered at this DR and you think it's fine, feel free to keep the image. I mostly focus on ensuring copyright is taken care of (as my contributions show), but I try to consider the rest of the project's scope as well. If I've been unclear, I apologize: I did not mean conflate NFCC as a copyright question with the Common's scope questions. Urbanracer34 earlier said "If that is not possible, it should fall under Fair Use.", so I tried to address that. In discussing NFCC #8, I was mostly trying to illustrate that if the file would not meet NFCC #8, it would seem it would also fail COM:PS. This was not meant to be a comment on the copyright question. -- ferret (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret @Jmabel If it's going to cause a lot of hassle and arguing among us about deciding if the file falls under fair use, I am prepared to retract my comment. Urbanracer34 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- The file does not fall under fair use, because it's current form is not copyrightable. I was simply using NFCC #8 as an example of whether or not the image had an educational purpose. I still do not see any educational purpose to this file, but if Commons folks think it has one, that's fine. -- ferret (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- I feel it does have an educational purpose for it to stay on commons. Urbanracer34 (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- The file does not fall under fair use, because it's current form is not copyrightable. I was simply using NFCC #8 as an example of whether or not the image had an educational purpose. I still do not see any educational purpose to this file, but if Commons folks think it has one, that's fine. -- ferret (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret @Jmabel If it's going to cause a lot of hassle and arguing among us about deciding if the file falls under fair use, I am prepared to retract my comment. Urbanracer34 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think we've basically solved the copyright issue. Kotaku writing about Insignia as linked above does give evidence that it is notable as far as Commons is concerned. I could ask a few video games historians off-wiki about Insignia if needed. Abzeronow (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel Copyright is the highest issue in my view, which is where I started. In the course of the discussion, you addressed it. I then considered the question of scope and educational purpose. If you are saying scope should not be considered at this DR and you think it's fine, feel free to keep the image. I mostly focus on ensuring copyright is taken care of (as my contributions show), but I try to consider the rest of the project's scope as well. If I've been unclear, I apologize: I did not mean conflate NFCC as a copyright question with the Common's scope questions. Urbanracer34 earlier said "If that is not possible, it should fall under Fair Use.", so I tried to address that. In discussing NFCC #8, I was mostly trying to illustrate that if the file would not meet NFCC #8, it would seem it would also fail COM:PS. This was not meant to be a comment on the copyright question. -- ferret (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- I respect that opinion and I value it. I feel Insignia is notable because it is a reverse engineering project taking on and is of an unprecedented scale. I think when certain games (an prime example mentioned in the wikipedia article being Halo 2) gain support (We don't know when) from the Insignia Team, it will become notable overnight as more sources would take notice of Insignia and the player count on Insignia services would skyrocket. I think it is better to establish notability of Insignia now rather than months down the line. Urbanracer34 (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jmabel is speaking with expertise as an administrator here and on English Wikipedia (where a solid citation from a third party source is more useful than a primary source). Ultimately, I think whether or not this image is educational comes down to whether Insignia is notable (being a mod that replicates the functionality of the original Xbox Live.) Abzeronow (talk) 00:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it is useful, even though it comes from Insignia themselves. It shows it exists and that it works. Urbanracer34 (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- But it cannot be nearly as useful for that as a solid citation of a third-party source. - Jmabel ! talk 00:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I feel it has an educational purpose. It shows "Insignia works." Urbanracer34 (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the article on Enwiki or its prose or sourcing, or whether Insignia is notable, or noteworthy, or real, or valuable or worked hard to accomplish what they did. I'm talking about whether or not this image, on its own, represents an educational purpose. -- ferret (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferret It is educational. Xbox Live was down for over 10 years before Insignia came along. The work that was taken by the Insignia team is gigantic to even get the first games going on their service a couple of years back when they first started. As per the Insignia WP and their website, they have 169 games supported (and more in the pipeline to be supported) and over 9000 users registered for Insignia. Per the following link everything has been reverse engineered and made from scratch: https://kotaku.com/insignia-project-aims-to-resurrect-xbox-live-for-the-or-1843600151 The fact that it is all from scratch also highlights the effort to get this far. Urbanracer34 (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, given that we all seem to agree that the copyright issue was addressed by blurring. It's probably borderline for scope, but we rarely delete over scope issues in borderline cases except where it appears someone uploaded with promotional intent, which does not appear to be the case here. - Jmabel ! talk 18:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I won't push on this, but the article was created last week and about 6-7 brand new, or infrequent, editors all suddenly worked on it, and the proponents of this screenshot are in direct contact with the Insignia team. As this is a non-commercial effort, it's not exactly... advertising? But it is a community driven promotional effort. I'll leave it at that though. I felt I found just enough sourcing not to send the article to AFD myself. -- ferret (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel @Ferret I think we have achieved consensus on this matter to keep the image. Urbanracer34 (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I won't push on this, but the article was created last week and about 6-7 brand new, or infrequent, editors all suddenly worked on it, and the proponents of this screenshot are in direct contact with the Insignia team. As this is a non-commercial effort, it's not exactly... advertising? But it is a community driven promotional effort. I'll leave it at that though. I felt I found just enough sourcing not to send the article to AFD myself. -- ferret (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Deleted the version with copyrighted elements. Article on en:WP still exists, so the image is in scope. --Ellywa (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)