Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎User:Davey2010: shant revert, shant close.
Line 84: Line 84:
:::I agree I can be snarky at times but when you're dragged here over the most silliest of reasons is it any wonder ? .... –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 14:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
:::I agree I can be snarky at times but when you're dragged here over the most silliest of reasons is it any wonder ? .... –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 14:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
::::My issues of late have all centered around ironically ANU (the reverting and now closures) ... So as such from this point forward I shan't (like I said before) revert any reports on ''any'' COM boards and I shan't close ''any'' threads on ''any'' COM boards, I'm also making the decision not to revert any sort of vandalism or trolling on these boards, Ofcourse I'll comment but as I said I shant revert or close - Prior to my recent helpful actions here my name's never really popped up here which would indicate it's only these 2 week actions that have been "problematic", So yeah shant revert and shant close, Hope this puts an end to all of these threads. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 15:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
::::My issues of late have all centered around ironically ANU (the reverting and now closures) ... So as such from this point forward I shan't (like I said before) revert any reports on ''any'' COM boards and I shan't close ''any'' threads on ''any'' COM boards, I'm also making the decision not to revert any sort of vandalism or trolling on these boards, Ofcourse I'll comment but as I said I shant revert or close - Prior to my recent helpful actions here my name's never really popped up here which would indicate it's only these 2 week actions that have been "problematic", So yeah shant revert and shant close, Hope this puts an end to all of these threads. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 15:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
:Admin boards are for admin, means: Admins are going to close discussions if they think no action is needed. Never ever do [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=301841054&diff=301857831 this] again, please. [[COM:MELLOW]]. --[[User:Steinsplitter|Steinsplitter]] ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 15:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


== User:Chris380W ==
== User:Chris380W ==

Revision as of 15:56, 31 May 2018

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • If appropriate, notify the user(s) concerned. {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Another Sztojka kevin3 sockpuppet

Please block and nuke the uploads of 431x (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ). Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PauPower21

Please block PauPower21 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads)  for continuing to upload nothing but copyright violations in spite of multiple warnings. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done 2 week block Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOL18

Resolved

Please block LOL18 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads)  again for continuing to upload nothing but copyright violations in spite of multiple warnings (including two "final" warnings) and a previous two-week block. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 16:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Indeffed, plenty of previous warnings including a final. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:NTiXikheGY

NTiXikheGY (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

Vandalism only account. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright#violation of logo --Majora (talk) 01:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ indef Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:44, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manz Oralde Taib

Manz Oralde Taib (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  has been uploading more copyvios after a block for doing it.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Blocked for a month (second block). All uploads are either deleted or nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sztojka kevin3 sockpuppets of the day

Please block and nuke the uploads of the following accounts:

Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 18:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Blocked, tagged, nuked. One user has no edits (not even deleted edits), I'm not sure, that (s)he belongs into the gang. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: you may consult with Wikipedia, e. g. hu:Szerkesztő:Deserion100. But, when tagging non-obvious puppets, it is preferable to provide «evidence=» argument, such as «evidence=hu:Szerkesztő:Deserion100» which is poor but better than leaving the field blank. References to sources of information greatly improve accountability and can mitigate adverse effects of groupthink, making such debacles as the one with Solomon203 less likely. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jonathan McCooper

Jonathan McCooper (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

Been uploading copyvios for years now. Two previous blocks for the same behavior. Doesn't look like they are getting the point nor does it appear like they ever will. --Majora (talk) 22:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for 1 year. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:38, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jon Kolbert: you must notify the blocked user. We can neglect this requirement for puppets and patent vandals, but this user seems to be an established Wikipedian writing articles in Spanish. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davey2010

I very nearly pulled the trigger myself, with the block notice "1 week|continued premature and poor closure of AN discussions after being specifically asked not to; a request which you explicitly noted"... however, while I don't think that being the one that warned him in the past involves me in a way that would make a block inappropriate, I do think that to avoid even the suspicion of impropriety, it would be good if I give other admins the chance to tell me that I'm overreacting. I would note that while what happens on other wikis should not directly influence this decision, this user has been blocked previously on enwiki for poor judgment in performing non-admin closures (specifically, doing them early after being warned not to). Undoing the damage that Davey causes with his flippant closures is often not possible, and even when it is, is always difficult and time consuming.

The general incivility he displays when criticized is also an exacerbating factor: it is damaging to the collegial atmosphere here, as are the ridiculous excuses and "notpologies" that are forthcoming when Davey expects sanctions. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How the topic of this noticeboard can solve the question? By the way is Storkk aware of the “user problems” noticeboard? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I was "Show preview"ing the block template and had the block itself ready to go, but thought I would have a few other admins look at it. That is, in fact, precisely what this board is for. See COM:BP: "Controversial blocks may be discussed at the blocks and protections noticeboard, preferably before they are applied if at all possible". I'll stipulate, though, that the block might not have been controversial - in which case I should just have applied it, rather than risk extra drama by bringing it up for discussion. Storkk (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The AFD issues over at EN weren't due to poor judgement - All AFDs over there are supposed to be closed in 7 days and I was closing them you might as well say a few hours early, These days I close ANI threads over there which is watched by thousands of people and at present no one has ever had an issue with those closures so I would say my judgement there is pretty good,
I don't see any issue with my closure in any way, shape or form, I don't make excuses at all I stated on your talkpage you were more than welcome to block me something which you refused,
You will note T Cells has closed the thread even tho they're not an admin so what's the difference between them closing it and myself ?, It's also worth nothing no admin other than yourself reverted my close which would indicate like my other closures here no one apart from yourself has an issue. –Davey2010Talk 12:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I genuinely don't see what the issue is with closing threads .... Admins have a lot to do as it is so surely closing threads is more helpful in that admins can divert their attention to more needed areas, But if Storkk would rather make life hard work for admins then I shall no longer help with closing and as such will leave it up to the admins, Sad state of affairs really. –Davey2010Talk 13:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is about non-admin closure rather Storkk was under the impression that you are not allowed to close ANI thread at this time following their warning in the last thread about you. T Cells (talk) 13:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I do not dispute that you genuinely don't see what the issue is with your closures. Nor did I raise this here to discuss the closures themselves... this is COM:AN/B, and I raised this to discuss with other admins whether they agree with my inclination to block, given that you "fuck off noted" the prior request to stop closing AN discussions (which, despite your ridiculous protestations to the contrary, was unlikely to be an autofill error, given your subsequent reaction on my talk page when I pointed you in the direction of how to clean your autofill... indeed, you have a marked tendency to be egregiously uncivil in your edit summaries). And no, the AFD issues were precisely as I said: about your judgment in closing AFDs - that the decisions were called clueful is true, however your persistent disregard of closure norms and "over-the-top rudeness and snark" were explicitly called out as bullet points 1 and 2. And in any case, I introduced our sister project's events not as a direct basis for a block here, but as evidence of a general pattern of poor judgment and abrasive behavior... this isn't an isolated incident. Storkk (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I disagree those issues over there was not in any way poor judgement, Many many editors and admins over there had actually agreed with the majority of my closures, The only poor judgement I did make was by promising not to close an AFD before 7 hours .... and then closing an AFD before 7 hours (which in turn led to a block which in turn was marked as time served) - I've not closed any since then, As I said my closures on the AN boards (over there) are all fine which would indicate my judgement is rather good - That being said I'm not perfect and I do make mistakes at times.
I agree I can be snarky at times but when you're dragged here over the most silliest of reasons is it any wonder ? .... –Davey2010Talk 14:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My issues of late have all centered around ironically ANU (the reverting and now closures) ... So as such from this point forward I shan't (like I said before) revert any reports on any COM boards and I shan't close any threads on any COM boards, I'm also making the decision not to revert any sort of vandalism or trolling on these boards, Ofcourse I'll comment but as I said I shant revert or close - Prior to my recent helpful actions here my name's never really popped up here which would indicate it's only these 2 week actions that have been "problematic", So yeah shant revert and shant close, Hope this puts an end to all of these threads. –Davey2010Talk 15:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Admin boards are for admin, means: Admins are going to close discussions if they think no action is needed. Never ever do this again, please. COM:MELLOW. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chris380W

They have continued to upload copyvios after the last warning. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections&oldid=303963817"