Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/02/22: Difference between revisions
m Bot: Archiving 5 threads from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/02/22 |
m Bot: Archiving 15 threads from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/02/22 |
||
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kurdî-کوردی.png}} |
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kurdî-کوردی.png}} |
||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kürrtlerin Tarihi.gif}} |
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kürrtlerin Tarihi.gif}} |
||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Johnnynstein}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hesen Zîrek.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahul Gandhi cropped.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harivarasanam.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Surrender of Muhammad Ghori.png}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woman on hily app.png}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aeroport Nador-El Aroui.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Debut de Patricio Vega en Primera división.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Icyogajuru}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Wallonia.svg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Z filmu Tu ten kámen (1923).jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bélivia flag.png}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Estudiantina Sauñe Perú.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gerd Mosdøl.jpg}} |
|||
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:SCARLET - Melodifestivalen 2024 20.jpg}} |
|||
Revision as of 21:06, 9 March 2024
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
GoogleMaps copyVio Enyavar (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Suspected CopyVio (watermark) Enyavar (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyVio (watermark) Enyavar (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a page (page 140) of a copyrighted book: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128042564/intracellular-consequences-of-amyloid-in-alzheimers-disease Piterkeo (talk) 00:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmedalansari1990 (talk · contribs)
Personal photos for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
- File:أحمد الأنصاري.jpg
- File:صورة شخصية أحمد الأنصاري.jpg
- File:أحمد الأنصاري 01.jpg
- File:أحمد الأنصاري 02.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 03:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 03:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
No permission since 2015 186.172.174.68 01:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
The design of Minnie in this stamp is still under copyright. Bedivere (talk) 01:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Azerbaijan World Chess Championship set for reference. Bedivere (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Already proposed for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Azerbaijan World Chess Championship set. Should have been deleted. Bedivere (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
I don’t want this to exist Gvtyhbiju (talk) 07:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused crop of File:Luxor temple at night 2007.jpg, violated the attribution requirement of the CC license. 0x0a (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.175.13.141 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1 Yann (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This person, is he cheating Commons? 186.172.71.96 12:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: it's a clear copyvio. PR poster, without proper details. --Yuval Y § Chat § 13:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Questa foto è un doppione Iskander1317 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Bild ist doppelt 2003:CE:8F0A:E29B:94D2:4257:1E9D:F4FF 15:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but it has a higher resolution than File:Dr.Wilfried Reuter.jpg has. I will rename R2E7263.jpg and then redirect the other one. --Achim55 (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: and renamed to File:Wilfried Reuter 2017.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 16:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This version of the Treasury seal is not approved by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 2601:155:8300:2D40:FC5A:158F:A653:2C2F 16:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep: They used it, see https://web.archive.org/web/20001217171300/http://www.treasury.gov/gpra/ --Achim55 (talk) 17:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
It's a wrong version of the logo. I'm uploading the right version right now. There should be a "t" at the end : "Délégué général aux droits de l'enfant". In this logo, it was forgotten. So it's not the right version. Webmaster DGDE (talk) 12:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader, correct replacement file was uploaded. --Rosenzweig τ 18:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hoort niet bij dit onderwerp ALVO56 (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unzureichende Lizenzrechte Crazycracker44 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment COM:INUSE at en:Vehicle registration plates of Alabama. --Rosenzweig τ 18:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Removed it --Crazycracker44 (talk) 18:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ColdBones10 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: fictional election maps
Enyavar (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear case, 3 versions of the same map. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (bad focus too). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 03:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per reasonably prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
I replaced this auto-traced raster file with a a PNG version. Kj1595 (talk) 07:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, modern mural, non-incidental inclusion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
This photo is my signature and it should not be in Wikimedia Commons. It violates my rights Sam Donsil (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This photo must be deleted. It violates someones rights TrumpHater67899 (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused personal photo, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my name and it should not be written here in WIKIMEDIA. It violates my rights as a person TrumpHater67899 (talk) 08:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my name. I am not allowing it to be put here TrumpHater67899 (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my name and I want it deleted from Wikimedia. ASAP TrumpHater67899 (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused personal image, no evident in-scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A misunderstanding has occurred with the Institution. The photographer was not informed. Talefiko (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A misunderstanding has occurred with the Institution. The photographer was not informed. Talefiko (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A misunderstanding has occurred with the Institution. The photographer was not informed. Talefiko (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A misunderstanding has occurred with the Institution. The photographer was not informed. Talefiko (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A misunderstanding has occurred with the Institution. The photographer was not informed. Talefiko (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A misunderstanding has occurred with the Institution. The photographer was not informed. Talefiko (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Old & dated file. New photo is being uploaded. Raf1022mas (talk) 12:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. Commons is for historic as well as most recent images. No reason to wait to upload another photo of a notable person. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
this file was uploaded accidentally and the person should not be in it, please delete both files; Mersiha Kalajdzija (WMDE) (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
-20240222155800-File:FilmFrauen_Berlinale_Edit-a-thon_02-2024_(6).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Nudity#New uploads LevandeMänniska (talk), 16:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No need for this new artist. 186.172.204.143 19:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; mediocre penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads LevandeMänniska (talk), 16:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Another confused youngster. Delete. 186.172.204.143 17:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possible hostile intent by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alone GTO $$$ (talk · contribs)
Possible copyvio: Music album cover, Obvious screenshot from YouTube
- File:FancyMasquerade Les Marionettes. jpg.png
- File:Fancy 2023. jpg.png
- File:Fancy 2023. png.png
- File:FancyVivaLaVida. jpg.png
- File:Matias Reim 2018.png
- File:Shaman Сделано в России.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Exif data indicates this is a copyrighted Reuters image. False claim of Creative Commons license. Muzilon (talk) 22:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
There is a no simple logo on the background. A solution would be to crop it,and to delete the older version of the imge. Ruthven (msg) 14:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- what does (no simple logo on the background) means? GiovanniPen (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ruthven Se ritoccassi digitalmente l'immagine rendendo il fondo un tinta unita, potrebbe andare? Arrow303 (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- ma l'immagine/logo nello sfondo è un disegno fatto dall'autore, non vedo quale sia il problema.
- poi blurrare o croppare l'immagine fa poca differenza, si può anche eliminare e mantenere solo l'altra se c'è necessità (ma non mi pare) GiovanniPen (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @GiovanniPen È proprio quello il problema, perché visto che il disegno sullo sfondo è stato realizzato dal personaggio fotografato (o comunque da qualcuno diverso dal fotografo) il diritto d'autore su quell'opera grafica, che è sopra la COM:TOO, appartiene al rispettivo autore e non può essere inclusa nell'opera sotto licenza libera, se non decorso il termine legale.
- Adesso ho oscurato totalmente il disegno e non dovrebbero esserci problemi (ma lascio facoltà a Ruthven di correggermi :P) Arrow303 (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- capisco, non pensavo che per un banale disegno potessero esserci problemi. bene così (annulliamo la cancellazione allora?) GiovanniPen (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Eh sì, purtroppo (ma giustamente) su questi temi si è fiscali per evitare anche possibili contestazioni. Per chiudere attenderei giusto il passaggio di Ruthven e la sua ramazza per cancellare le vecchie versioni :) Arrow303 (talk) 13:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @GiovanniPen mi sa che il problema del logo è presente anche con un'altra immagine da te caricata: Barbascura-live.jpg, ma non ne sono sicuro al 100%, visto che è poco presente nello sfondo rispetto a qua. Ti volevo solo avvisare :) Eletro 16 (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- no vabb lì direi de minimis. irrilevante penso; qui si vedeva proprio tipo tutto, ma tanto è stata croppata e blurrata quindi ok così GiovanniPen (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @GiovanniPen mi sa che il problema del logo è presente anche con un'altra immagine da te caricata: Barbascura-live.jpg, ma non ne sono sicuro al 100%, visto che è poco presente nello sfondo rispetto a qua. Ti volevo solo avvisare :) Eletro 16 (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Eh sì, purtroppo (ma giustamente) su questi temi si è fiscali per evitare anche possibili contestazioni. Per chiudere attenderei giusto il passaggio di Ruthven e la sua ramazza per cancellare le vecchie versioni :) Arrow303 (talk) 13:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- capisco, non pensavo che per un banale disegno potessero esserci problemi. bene così (annulliamo la cancellazione allora?) GiovanniPen (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ruthven Se ritoccassi digitalmente l'immagine rendendo il fondo un tinta unita, potrebbe andare? Arrow303 (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: but the file was cropped and I deleted the older versions, as agreed. --Jaqen (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malttew9983 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: various fictitious flags and emblems.
- File:Bandera oficial.png
- File:Bandera presidencia de ragusa.png
- File:Bandera de Independencia de ragusa.png
- File:Bandera sinescudo.png
- File:Escudo de Armas de Ragusa.png
- File:Luxemburgismo.png
- File:Escudo de gales independiente.png
Omphalographer (talk) 19:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. All these images appear to have been created/"invented" by the uploader. Something which is not at all clear from the descriptions (In fact, several of the images, like File:Bandera de Independencia de ragusa.png, appear to assert that they represent historical flags - when there is nothing to indicate that this is the case, and every indication otherwise). Absent specific details and sourcing, these images are outside (and perhaps even directly conflicting with) the COM:EDUSE scope criteria. Guliolopez (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- The "Ragusa" flags are complicated. There are two cities which have been called Ragusa - one in Sicily, one in Croatia - and both of them have, at some point, had active independence movements. However, I can't find any solid evidence that any of these flags were used by those movements, and the details in the image descriptions are irreconcilable with the history of either city. Omphalographer (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
The first revision of the file is an obvious COM:COPYVIO, the second has appeared at least once before online: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://www.tiktok.com/api/img/?itemId%3D7011912095193238790%26location%3D0%26aid%3D1988&tbnid=35SBgr9HKUXIFM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https://www.tiktok.com/discover/X-factor-bingo-wings&docid=tjNQSDsdpf14mM&w=720&h=1280&hl=en-US&gl=US&source=sh/x/im/m5/2&kgs=93f1e702ae8e60a2&shem=trie — gabldotink [ talk | contribs | global account ] 17:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Érico. --Rosenzweig τ 19:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
著作権フリーでない画像を投稿してしまいました。申し訳ありません。 二代目チャンストゥー (talk) 22:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 19:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Random penis photo, also appears to be a screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D/3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Nepal A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, no free licence on the declared Facebook source. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 07:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This photo is my picture. And I do not consent this photo to be in Wikimedia Commons Sam Donsil (talk) 07:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. A kid, most probably photographed without his knowledge and uploaded without his parents' consent. 186.172.71.96 14:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- And a simple tractor in the image, there are many others here. 186.172.71.96 14:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope anyway. Mosbatho (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope image, Blurred and no context what so ever. iMahesh (talk) 09:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No context and Blurred image, shoe covers 70% of image. Out of scope. iMahesh (talk) 09:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Scan from a print, no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 10:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No clue who this is or why he’s important Dronebogus (talk) 10:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There is a young man by this name who appears to be a wrestler for the Cohasset, Massachusetts High School wrestling team, so he could conceivably become famous someday, but he's a different person than the one depicted in this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Boy bands
Appears to be spam for some no-name band
- File:DON'T WORRY 'BOUT IT Somebody's Somewhere Leak.webm
- File:MS.BOULEVARD by Somebody's Somewhere Cover.jpg
- File:Somebody's Somewhere, Group Photo.png
- File:UNTITLED7423 Somebody's Somewhere Leak.webm
Dronebogus (talk) 10:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 11:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per COM:TOY. 0x0a (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeongmin Park (talk · contribs)
Commons is not a repository for children's personal "artwork". No COM:EDUSE, OOS.
Achim55 (talk) 14:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not a child !
- Why you hate me ? Jeongmin FNaF (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just want to draw and my community YouTube told me to do that.
- Everybody hate me but not YouTube.
- I am harassed and I suffer a lot. Please don't delete this account... It’s a way to free myself and my subscribers. I just wanted to please them, and for my stalker to no longer bother me at the same time. She's been harassing me for 4 years. She still doesn't stop. Please, administration, do not delete my account and drawings... I hope you understand everything, because I am French, basically.
- @Achim55 please don't delete this account and this drawings... _Jeongmin Park_ (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also COM:DW. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Collection 186.172.71.96 14:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Collage of paintings by modern artist; no reason why uploader would have authority to grant license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Infrogmation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Not used anywhere, has outdated information, and looks like promotional material for a now-irrelevant bitcoin fork. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Violations of either COM:De minimis, COM:FOP France, or COM:TOYS
- File:2023-01-07 14-44-36 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 14-45-22 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 14-47-00 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 14-47-29 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 14-47-51 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 15-15-32 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-26-39 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-29-33 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-30-18 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-30-49 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-31-11 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-31-54 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-32-21 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
- File:2023-01-07 16-36-13 vintage-Andelnans.jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Not used anywhere, promotional material for a non-notable cryptocurrency project, doesn't have anything to do with bitcoin despite file name and description suggesting otherwise. AVDLCZ (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from commercial image service without permission and uses bogus anonymity claim Denniss (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Photograph was published by the German government in 1944 with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim. Nominating user nominated all of my uploads for deletion indiscriminately after reverting my edits on Wikipedia proper. Durchbruchmüller (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Is there any indication of Getty holding a copyright over this? (rather than simply claiming that they do) Andy Dingley (talk) 12:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- For the license to be valid the uploader must have taken some steps to find an author for that image. He has not done anything in that direction, just uploading something found in the web. The claim that it was published by the german government can not be verified either. Image does not look like a typical propaganda image but more like taken from a soldier. On Getty page Ullstein Bild is stated as copyright holder.--Denniss (talk) 18:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There's not a single shred of evidence that this photo "was published by the German government", nor that it was originally published "with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim". And even if it were, that would not mean that the photo is automatically in the public domain, that's not how German Urheberrecht (copyright) works. Plus, the URAA would have restored the US copyrights of a 1944 German publication. Per Getty (where this was apparently taken from), the photo is from ullstein bild, which is the photo archive of a German publisher. So probably shot by some news photographer or military photographer and protected in Germany for 70 years pma. Without even knowing when, where and how this was originally published, we cannot claim it is in the public domain. --Rosenzweig τ 05:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no primary source, bogus license claim Denniss (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Photograph was published by the United States Army in 1945 with no attribution to any specific author, no copyright for this photograph every existed. Nominating user nominated all of my uploads for deletion indiscriminately after reverting my edits on Wikipedia proper. Durchbruchmüller (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please provide clear evidence that this image is a United States Army publication or better that the author is a US service man? Mosbatho (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There's not a single shred of evidence that this photo "was published by the United States Army in 1945 with no attribution to any specific author". Per Getty, it's from Keystone/Hulton Archive, so most likely a press photo, which might still be copyrighted or not, or might have been unpublished before 2003. Without more details about the first publication, we cannot ascertain this photo's copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 05:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no primary source, bogus license claim Denniss (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Photograph was published by the German government in 1941 with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim. Nominating user nominated all of my uploads for deletion indiscriminately after reverting my edits on Wikipedia proper. Durchbruchmüller (talk) 22:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There's not a single shred of evidence that this photo "was published by the German government", nor that it was originally published "with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim". And even if it were, that would not mean that the photo is automatically in the public domain, that's not how German Urheberrecht (copyright) works. Plus, the URAA would have restored the US copyrights of a 1941 German publication. Taken from another wiki, where no original source or first publication is mentioned. Without more details about the first publication, we cannot ascertain this photo's copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 05:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no primary source, bogus license claim Denniss (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Photograph was published by the Soviet government in 1945 with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim. Nominating user nominated all of my uploads for deletion indiscriminately after reverting my edits on Wikipedia proper. Durchbruchmüller (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There's not a single shred of evidence that this photo "was published by the Soviet government", nor that it was originally published "with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim". And even if it were, that would not mean that the photo is automatically in the public domain. Plus, the URAA would have restored the US copyrights of a 1945 Soviet publication. Taken from some forum, no details about the first publication there. --Rosenzweig τ 05:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no primary source, bogus license claim Denniss (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Photograph was published by the German government in 1941 with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim. Nominating user nominated all of my uploads for deletion indiscriminately after reverting my edits on Wikipedia proper. Durchbruchmüller (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- The US copyright would be covered by {{PD-US-alien property}}, the US confiscated the copyright to Nazi images. --RAN (talk) 13:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- no attribution/no author is just a claim, image would not be free in the source country and EU. --Denniss (talk) 17:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- I assume that we Keep per {{Anonymous-EU}}. --2001:4452:16B:1900:F041:E358:82DC:484E 11:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- For this template to be valid the uploader must have taken steps to verify the claim it was actually published without author an no one claimed authership. This is clearly not the case for this uploader. --Denniss (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- I assume that we
- no attribution/no author is just a claim, image would not be free in the source country and EU. --Denniss (talk) 17:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There's not a single shred of evidence that this photo "was published by the German government", nor that it was originally published "with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim". And even if it were, that would not mean that the photo is automatically in the public domain, that's not how German Urheberrecht (copyright) works. Plus, the URAA would have restored the US copyrights of a 1941 German publication. And no matter how often RAN copies this bogus boilerplate text (about the Alien Property Custodian and that supposedly "the US confiscated the copyright to Nazi images") into DRs, that sweeping generalisation still isn't true. Taken from some web site, where no original source or first publication is mentioned. Without more details about the first publication, we cannot ascertain this photo's copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 05:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no primary source, bogus license claim Denniss (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Photograph was published by the German government in 1940 with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim. Nominating user nominated all of my uploads for deletion indiscriminately after reverting my edits on Wikipedia proper. Durchbruchmüller (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There's not a single shred of evidence that this photo "was published by the German government", nor that it was originally published "with no attribution to any specific author, with the copyright being voided per the original claim". And even if it were, that would not mean that the photo is automatically in the public domain, that's not how German Urheberrecht (copyright) works. Plus, the URAA would have restored the US copyrights of a 1940 German publication. Taken from some web site, where no original source or first publication is mentioned. Without more details about the first publication, we cannot ascertain this photo's copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 05:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
probably wrong license (copyvio) Mateus2019 (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my original artwork and it was posted here without permission Lunacrystalllc (talk) 22:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Japan and this image focuses on copyrighted advertising banners. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete NoFoP-Japan.--Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:JGtn
Lack of COM:EDUSE, personal "artwork", simple:JGtn has been deleted twice per lack of notability.
Achim55 (talk) 11:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
unused. Seems advertisement. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Question Surely, it's possible to take photographs with people in the background, no? What I'd be more concerned about is whether the bus station is under copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Question Impossible to take beach photos in Estonia except when they are deserted in winter or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No. No it does not. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What is the problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Visible people are small figures, even at full res faces do not seem identifiable. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No. No, it does not. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No. No, it does not. Are you serious? Looking at the full res version, hard to see any people at all - after searching a while all I could find was a vague silhouette seen through the window of one of the visible cars. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No, it doesn't. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 12:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Urban scene, slight incidental inclusion of one visible face waiting at a bus stop - is this a problem? If so, please explain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to explain. Uploader trying to take his pictures out of Commons. Keep all. 186.174.171.112 01:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Anon: So you think User:18.453216a.235 is User:Bandaranaice? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to explain. Uploader trying to take his pictures out of Commons. Keep all. 186.174.171.112 01:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Contains Photographs of identifiable people 18.453216a.235 (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep People visible as small figures in urban streetscape; even in full res version no recognizable faces. I see no problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
random private nude photo / no educational value LevandeMänniska (talk), 16:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not at all. Delete. 186.172.204.143 18:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deepaholiq (talk · contribs)
Possible F10
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D/3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
The architect of this French building, Auguste Perret, died in 1954, so the building is still copyrighted in France, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2025. Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
OOS fantasy flag "The national flag of the Antarctic Republic." -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
May show interior architecture still under architect's copyright, and a similarly-named file was deleted through Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SMX Convention Center. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS + COM:DW of copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality image, now unused and replaced by SVG version. Alhadis (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure in small resolution. The proposed SVG version is clearly superior. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 18:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project's scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Change to Delete, as there is a risk of copyright violation. The image is widely available online, including in webpages that are dated before the upload to Commons.[1][2][3][4] Verbcatcher (talk) 10:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Change to
Deleted: User has history of copyright violations, see [5][6][7][8] per Verbcatcher. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 18:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
uploader is not the author Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
appears to be taken from the person's social media profile, and the image is at least from June 2022: https://www.instagram.com/p/CfQBNTJpLS6/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
unused. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
not own work. From www.discogs.com. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. If you are trying to write an encyclopedia article, please read en:Help:Your first article. Omphalographer (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I don't understand? The document contains much information of historical nature and should be available to the public just as the photos and document scans. This is not a work of fiction... Is the purpose of wikimedia not to inform the world? Mibgau (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but Commons is a repository of images and doesn't host PDFs except when they are in use on other projects. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: from Facebook in 2023 https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=387828370444113&set=a.175261111700841 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atoms & not drawn according to MoS guidelines. In addition, the areas around the oxygen atoms have a strange white background. Replaced by File:Butyl-butyrate-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete and replace with Butyl-butyrate-2D-skeletal.svg, low quality with white background. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Doubt on the picture taken by the model, F10
- File:EDilhac Performance Instrumentarium Alençon.jpg
- File:E.Dilhac Didgeridoo.jpg
- File:EDilhac Célébration d'une musique originelle p55.jpg
- File:EDilhac Célébration d'une musique originelle . Livre, p19.jpg
- File:EDilhac . Musique Originelle performance Les Eyzies.jpg
- File:EDilhac musicien des temps originels.jpg
- File:Emmanuel dilhac Rythmique Peinture.jpg
- File:Emmanuel Dilhac Chante.png
- File:Lettre de Jean Dubuffet.jpg
- File:Emmanuel Dilhac jeune peintre.jpg
- File:Emmanuel Dilhac Signature.tif
- File:Emmanuel Dilhac Artiste français.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Oktay YONTEM (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The stated reason for the nomination is nonsense, but the file is presumably copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Oktay YONTEM (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The stated reason for the nomination is nonsense, but the file is presumably copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Most probably not an own work as claimed. 186.10.110.138 22:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Copied from https://galama.website/2021/05/ortse-stefkovski-tsarot-go-spodeli-svojot-plach-i-lelek/. Page has copyright notice. Ђидо (talk) 23:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused USA flag with incorrect proportions (cropped on the right, huge empty space below). Omphalographer (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Basicdesign (talk · contribs)
Most likely this is a copyright violation and not an entirely self-drawn map as stated with "own work".
- File:CleryAffluentF4284001.JPG
- File:CleryAffluentF4283501Courtmaux.JPG
- File:CleryAffluentF4283001BrasChtcq.JPG
- File:CleryAffluentF4282001-St-Hilaire.JPG
- File:CleryAffluentF4281001.JPG
- File:GR132.JPG
Ies (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Basicdesign (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own works: dimensions is smaller than the user's other photos, incomplete metadata, user had history of uploading lots of screenshots of Google Street View.
- File:Besseges-D51-la marchande.JPG
- File:Maison Feuillette.JPG
- File:Cloître et confluence canal de Briare avec Puiseaux. Montargis.JPG
- File:Canal de Briare frm pont du quebec.JPG
- File:Rouvres-sous-Meilly--eglise.JPG
0x0a (talk) 09:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nishanth Subramanya (talk · contribs)
User with bad history, small images of personalities without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Tarun Shivappa.jpg
- File:Aniruddha Jatkar.jpg
- File:Poornachandra Tejaswi.jpg
- File:Tejaswini Prakash.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of SCOPE. Not in use. We have a lot of pictures of this sculpture without somebody's mother [9]. Shakko (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
not own work: see metadata (author: Fabrizio Di Costanzo) Bradipo Lento (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
nothing to see, no use possible Joschi71 (talk) 11:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabil Khoer Al Munawar (talk · contribs)
unlikely to be own works: small size, no metadata or metadata reads "FBMD.....".
- File:Watu Sodong.jpg
- File:Pintu Bukit Watu Sodong.jpg
- File:Bukit Watu Sodong.jpg
- File:Curug Sikopel Banjarnegara.jpg
0x0a (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
the design of the European Rugby Champions Cup trophy is not free PeeJay (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's a fair cop. I misunderstood what was permissible. As the uploader, I support removal here. WilliamDenton (talk) 06:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Garbled collage of AI-misgenerated and miscaptioned photos about social movements, like that time the SOCIAL MXENTTS were campaigning for HEICAL CORCIT and a zombie was REF-TR-WAKP. Out of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment it is COM:INUSE here, but it seems useless to me. I don't oppose deletion then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominator - I don't think the linked page User:Rockpeterson/WLF/22-Feb-2024 really counts as COM:INUSE, as it's apparently a semi-automatically generated list for the Wiki Loves Folklore project based on categories, so not a conscious decision to use that specific image. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
too blurry in hindsight LostplanetKD73 (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project's scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, within project scope. As indicated in the file, this is a presenter at a TV station, which is confirmed on the TV station's website.[10] Verbcatcher (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the description indicates that the subject was a member of a parliament, which would clearly be within project scope. There is an entry on the Kurdistan Region Parliament that appears to confirm this.[11] Verbcatcher (talk) 09:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 05:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete, the photo is not at the specified URL, although the page content may have changed. However, the footer on the webpage includes "İhlas Haber Ajansı © Her hakkı saklıdır. www.iha.com.tr web sitemizdeki tüm içeriklerimiz, kaynak gösterilerek dahi Abone olmadan kısmen veya tamamen kullanılamaz", which Google translation of Turkish gives "İhlas News Agency © All rights reserved. All our content on our website www.iha.com.tr cannot be used in whole or in part without subscribing, even by citing the source." so it probable that this copyright claim applied to the file concerned. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
No location information, it doesn't show anything notable. Lack of educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Promotional copyrighted image. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, there is no objection to promotional images on Commons, providing that they have a credible educational purpose. This shows a building construction process, which is acceptable. The photo has a free license, the archive source[12] includes "Attribution-Share Alike by taygorsiding". If you link on the symbol there you get to a Creative Commons page for CC BY-SA 3.0, which matches the license tag in this file. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, could be useful, so why not keep it if there are no copyright issues? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not own works, not sure if they're old enough to be in public domain.
- File:نهر النيل.webp
- File:جلسه الترفيه والترب في التراث المصري قديما.webp
- File:قبل ان يرحل يقبل تراب بلده.webp
- File:الصيادين.webp
- File:مجالس الأسرة المصريه قديما امام الدار بعد إنهاء العمل.webp
- File:رمز الفلاح المصري القديم بشرب من ايناء فخار مصنوع يدويا.webp
- File:تراث مصر القديمة بلاد النوبه النيل والمواويل.webp
0x0a (talk) 07:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false claims, COM:DW, no actual source info. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Bogus license. Not old enough for PD-old-70. Yann (talk) 11:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; a 2006 document clearly cannot have been created by someone who died more than 70 years ago. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Intentionally distorted photo, useless; we have other images for this church, including File:PROVES PIAZZA DELLA CHIESA - panoramio.jpg which is mostly the same. Syrio posso aiutare? 11:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright status of the depicted toy car is unclear. Per COM:TOYS, "When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy." El Grafo (talk) 13:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, see COM:VEHICLE, which includes Current Commons policy allows images of vehicles on the basis that the 3D shape of a vehicle will not normally be entitled to copyright protection. By extension, a 3D model in the shape of a car will not be protected. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I want to delte account Catshit89 (talk) 17:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Catshit89, it is currently not possible to delete an account on Wikimedia wikis. This is not the place to do so (you made a nomination to delete an image, not an account). You can rename your account at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or just stop editing. ObserveOwl (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - personal file that the uploader apparently doesn't want it here. COM:CSD#G7 applies. This is a low quality cat picture that has little usefulness to Commons anyway. Marbletan (talk) 14:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: photo deleted per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Wrong information about the files and the author of the work ; if they are dated 1977/78, they are still not in the public domain anyway. Daehan (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW of work by artist not yet PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
copyvio (COM:TOO Austria); logo not in use Appartei (talk) 10:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:Gijs Staverman Lekkere Track.jpg Yann (talk) 10:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for taking so long to respond, I originally nominated this file because the same picture could be found here http://web.archive.org/web/20221206180209/https://kro-ncrv.nl/programmas/gijs-24/lekkere-track although I didn't notice the resolution was much smaller, I suppose this file can be kept (and File:Final Gijs Lekkere track.jpg undeleted, because it is just a crop). Sorry again for the disturbance. -- Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Com:Penis Speedy 186.172.66.190 11:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep seems to have an unusually tight foreskin, or at least an unusual shape Dronebogus (talk) 08:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not special enough IMO. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
No creo que sea obra propia de Cyber Hwon. Hay que tener Winter ya! 186.172.174.68 00:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo on musician's website, no indication of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Photos posted on Flickr by Presidencia de Guatemala, however Copyright holder is Steffen Leiprecht ( http://sl-pictures.de/ )
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9372 (53533521893).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9375 (53533657959).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9394 (53533764800).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9411 (53533521428).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9420 (53533521843).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9435 (53532449917).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9439 (53532450232).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9446 (53533764715).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9467 (53533764720).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9476 (53533657889).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9478 (53533521748).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9481 (53533657839).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9483 (53533764685).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9502 (53533657824).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9511 (53533338191).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9537 (53533657784).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9578 (53532450097).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9593 (53533764565).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9597 (53533338151).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9600 (53532450047).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9608 (53533338121).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9611 (53532450012).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9614 (53533521578).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9615 (53532450007).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9618 (53532449967).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9633 (53533764475).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9636 (53533764470).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9641 (53533521498).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9653 (53533657619).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9660 (53533521468).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9666 (53533657574).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9691 (53533521383).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9693 (53533521363).jpg
- File:MSC2024 01 A-9700 (53533337956).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
// sikander { talk } 🦖 00:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Why does the copyright holder being a commercial photographer matter? (We should note this in the author metadata, although it's not clear if it's traceable to a single photographer). This is precisely the sort of person who would take such photos. The point, for our purposes, is whether there is a credible claim that they have been freely licensed by someone in a position to do that. I see no reason to doubt that here.
- Additionally, the European law default position on copyright here would be, in the absence of any documentation to the contrary, that the copyright resided with the body commissioning such a commercial work for hire, not the photographer. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- My thought process was that the people running Gobierno de Guatemala Flickr account seem to be knowledgeable and tag their photos as "Credit: Secretaría de Comunicación Social de la Presidencia" (example: image). So, I'm unsure if copyright transfer to Government of Guatemala from a local German photo studio can be assumed, especially when the photo metadata states "Copyright holder: sl-pictures.de" I suppose COM:VTRS exists for this exact scenario. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- We don't care who holds the copyright. (We just don't) We care (a little) who the photographer was, because we like (like, not need) to credit them. We care a lot that they're freely licensed. By someone, we don't care who. So all we care about (strongly) for date, author, copyright holder is to either ascertain whether the person who here claims to have issued a free licence was entitled to do so. They either hold the copyright, or they have the agency to issue licences for it (we don't care which). Or else that they're now PD by age. Anything else is just decorative or of historical interest. Our only question that appears on the DR checklist is, Was the agency issuing this free licence able to do so?. I am happy that the Guatemalan government department responsible has done so correctly, at least to my reasonable standards of enquiry for the project. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- My thought process was that the people running Gobierno de Guatemala Flickr account seem to be knowledgeable and tag their photos as "Credit: Secretaría de Comunicación Social de la Presidencia" (example: image). So, I'm unsure if copyright transfer to Government of Guatemala from a local German photo studio can be assumed, especially when the photo metadata states "Copyright holder: sl-pictures.de" I suppose COM:VTRS exists for this exact scenario. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Apparently the Government of Guatemala gives credit to photographer in their employ and shares the photo under free license. No evidence gov't of Guatemala lacks authority to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/multimedia.europarl.europa.eu
Legal notice of the European Parliament implies a no-derivative work restriction, and it is not acceptable on Commons. See also VP discussion.
- File:Https api.multimedia.europarl.europa.eu documents 20125 60218672 19704.jpeg
- File:Https api.multimedia.europarl.europa.eu documents 20125 65815221 1665418565072 I231213.jpg
- File:Https cfvod.eu.kaltura.com p 208 thumbnail entry id 0 fb4pxltx width 275 height 156 vid sec 304.jpg
- File:Https cfvod.eu.kaltura.com p 208 thumbnail entry id 0 fb4pxltx width 275 height 156 vid sec 327.jpg
- File:Https cfvod.eu.kaltura.com p 208 thumbnail entry id 0 fb4pxltx width 275 height 156 vid sec 250.jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (2).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (4).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (3).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister to the EP (2).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (1).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (6).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (8).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (7).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (6).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (3).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (5).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (2).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (4).jpg
- File:Meloni Sassoli (1).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister to the EP (1).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (8).jpg
- File:1665411457821 20221010 EP-137865A PB9 151 MOBILE.jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (5) (cropped).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (9) (cropped).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (7).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (8) (cropped).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister to the EP (1) (cropped).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (9).jpg
- File:Visit of Italian Minister Giorgia Meloni (5).jpg
- File:10.10.22 Rob Roos vaccine Covid Pfizer transmission testing yes or not.webm
- File:10.10.22 Rob Roos vaccin Covid Pfizer transmission testee oui ou non.webm
- File:10.10.22 Janine Small Covid vaccine Pfizer testing transmission.webm
- File:10.10.22 Janine Small Covid vaccin Pfizer testé arrêt transmission.webm
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/multimedia.europarl.europa.eu
Legal notice of the European Parliament implies a no-derivative work restriction, and it is not acceptable on Commons. See also VP discussion. Note that the {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} template only applies to media published on https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/.
- File:François-Xavier Bellamy - Session Plénière Strasbourg.jpg
- File:François-Xavier Bellamy intervenant en Session Plénière (crop).jpg
- File:Roberta METSOLA, EP President meets with Petr PAVEL, President of Czechia.jpg
- File:AFET Committee Meeting, Nabih Berri.jpg
- File:AFET Committee Meeting, Nabih Berri (cropped).jpg
- File:François-Xavier Bellamy au Parlement européen en 2021.jpg
- File:Jean-Marie Poiré, 1993, European Parliament.jpg
- File:Taro Nakayama 20040421.jpg
- File:Taro Nakayama 20040421 (cropped).jpg
- File:Christian Clavier, 1993.jpg
- File:Hajime Funada 20230712 1.jpg
- File:Hanin, Depardieu, Schwartzenberg, Clavier.jpg
- File:Hajime Funada 20230712 2.jpg
- File:Hiroyuki Sonoda 20040421 (cropped).jpg
- File:Hajime Funada 20230712 1 (cropped).jpg
- File:Hiroyuki Sonoda 20040421.jpg
- File:Hajime Funada 20230712 2 (cropped).jpg
- File:1669127364624 20221122 EP-140268A DEN 1371 (1).jpg
- File:Marco Pannella and Coluche, European Parliament, 1981 - 1.jpg
- File:Coluche, 1986, European Parliament.jpg
- File:Marco Pannella and Coluche, European Parliament, 1981 - 2.jpg
- File:Claude Autant-Lara, 1989, European Parliament.jpg
- File:MEP Jeroen Lenaers (2022) - EPP press conference at EP in Strasbourg 18.10.2022.jpg
- File:Wolfgang Schussel, Jacques Chirac, Lionel Jospin, Nice Summit, december 2000.jpg
- File:Coluche, European Parliament, 1981.jpg
- File:21st G7 Speakers' Meeting family photo.jpg
- File:Banri Kaieda 20230908.jpg
- File:Jacques Chirac, arrival of the Head of States at Nice Summit, december 2000.jpg
- File:Jacques Chirac and Nicole Fontaine, Nice Summit, december 2000.jpg
- File:Jacques Chirac, Nice Summit, december 2000.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_EPP_press_conference_at_EP_in_Strasbourg_18.10.2022.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- On the countrary, the legal notice clearly gives an authorisation to use the photos published on the website https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/ can be used, even for commercial purposes, provided that the source is acknowledged. The legal notice regulating these photographies can be found on this website: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legal-notice/en/
- I would therefore recommend to remove the nomination for deletion for these pictures. Charles-Michel Wagner (talk) 10:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per Charles-Michel Wagner. --Groupir ! (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project's scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project's scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnnynstein (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own works: small dimensions, incomplete metadata, user has a history of uploading screenshots of Google Street View.
0x0a (talk) 09:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; one of them looks to have streetview corner distortion; unreliable uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Own work? Who? 186.172.62.209 11:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Who was answered by category, but not consistent as work of uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This image is stolen from the internet. It is impossible for the user to have shot the image himself and that too this closely. This user has no prior experience of photography and neither has a record of taking photos or any history of any other uploaded picture. This image needs to deleted as this violates Wikimedia copyright laws and regulations. 122.171.16.150 13:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- You are an IP user. And I am owner of this pic as I edited it and then added here. Jagnath Sha (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- IP user vs your fraud cannot sustain here. I appeal that this image is deleted permanently from Wikimedia Commons. This stolen image from internet and websites are against the rules and regulations. This is a theft of rights. 122.171.18.181 19:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In reverse image search, other versions online seen are more recent than the Wikimedia upload. Anon @122.171.18.181: : If you have evidence it was online earlier, please present it. @Jagnath Sha: - the metadata credits "Atul Yadav" - is that you? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - only other photo uploaded by user found to be a clear copyright violation. More research showed "Atul Yadav" to be photographer for mass media in India. (If User Jagnath Sha is photographer Atul Yadav, please submit confirmation per COM:VRT and image can be undeleted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Scan of a religious poem of unknown authorship, with countless spelling mistakes. Out of project scope. — kashmīrī TALK 13:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- recheck Erbmjha2 (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While I do not know how to read Hindi, the text is clearly long enough to qualify for copyright. Unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Completely unreliable image as it contradicts with history. The surrender of Muhammad of Ghor in Battle of Kasahrada is not mentioned any of the reliable sources. As, it was a retreat from the battlefield. ImperialAficionado (talk) 13:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- i've mentioned the source too https://books.google.co.in/books?id=gSZqDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA265&dq=durjanshalji+jhala&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwit3PaFp7-EAxUuUGwGHfjxAz4QuwV6BAgKEAc#v=onepage&q=Ghuri&f=false 2409:4071:2402:2DD5:A03B:D043:A9B1:C0C8 15:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If this is a historical artwork, and if there is no copyright issue, it should be kept. There are loads and loads of historical artworks that contain false narratives and even libels. You can always add more information in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, the book is not a reliable source for history. And indeed, it is not a historical artwork. Battle of Kasahrada resulted a retreat of Ghurids. Not a surrender. The source is a complete fairytale. Check the result of "Battle of Kasahrada" in other sources and this book. ImperialAficionado (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Propaganda can be useful to include, if proper context is provided. What would make this a historical artwork is how old it is. Do you know how old it is? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as lacking any confirmation of free license. No reason why uploader would have authority to grant rights under cc-by-4.0 nor seen at source. Artwork stated to be from 2024, if so under copyright (may not be accurate statement, but lacking information needed to determine if it is free licensed for any other reason). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
False source attribution. Image identical to https://hily.com/about/ Wotheina (talk) 16:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CV © 2024 Hily. All rights reserved. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
lo subi mal Infoleprosa (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Icyogajuru (talk · contribs)
These images are from the Paul Kagame Flickr account, https://www.flickr.com/photos/paulkagame/8509198289 and https://www.flickr.com/photos/paulkagame/32780716985, where they were uploaded in 2013 and 2017, so years ago. There they are marked https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/, which is not a license we can accept here on Commons - we can't take either non-commercial or no-derivatives. They were uploaded here last week, and marked "own work". I'm skeptical they are actually "own work". If User:Icyogajuru is actually part of the Kagame staff, and has the right to release these photos, we would be very happy, but then they should write the Commons:Volunteer Response Team as that link says to verify that.
(I'm specifying "the Paul Kagame account" because Kagame is the current president of Rwanda, so I'm pretty sure he didn't take them himself, as he has more important things to do than take photos and maintain a Flickr account, however, I'm also sure he has a sizeable staff whose job includes just that. I see that on one of them User:Victuallers also noticed they are from Paul Kagame on Flickr.)
GRuban (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The file is not the official flag of Wallonia. This is a document created by Walloon Governement for communicantion operations of administration (https://www.wallonie.be/fr/logos-wallons). This is not a document in public domain. Sthubertliege (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Likely falls under PD-Belgium-exempt as part of an "official act of the authorities". Also, the nominating user uploaded a rather similar version of the flag under a free license. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as prompt uploader request; uploader has other version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- File name redirected to other version. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted per User:Tom-L] [13] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Imagevio. Director of the film Karel Anton died in 1979, so probably copyrighted until the end of 2049. Gumruch (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: fictitious flag (note: "Bélivia", not Bolivia) Omphalographer (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Doubt on the authorship, other similar pictures exist https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Estudiantina+Sau%C3%B1e+Per%C3%BA&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Ffanyv88.com%3A443%2Fhttps%2Fi.scdn.co%2Fimage%2Fab67616d0000b2739af2f77b27018117dfcc9377 https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b27380b537407e6b50c93edc1bc9 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo, non-notable person: nowiki article deleted. Uploaded by SPA. Also ticket:2024022210006789. Ankry (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. --Morten Haugen (talk) 07:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Oktay YONTEM (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel that way, but I won't argue against it. Adjoka (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps it could be a bit better by retouching the image, raising the exposure and de-noising it. However, the latest picture of them (File:Scarlet & Thirsty - Melodifestivalen 2024.jpg) serves a better job of depicting them than this one. Adjoka (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: It is certainly not "nonsense", as categorization shows; part of series of photos of in scope event/performance. Poor lighting, but might be improved with levels adjustment. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
