User talk:林高志: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Line 124: Line 124:


我看這張照片「[[:File:基隆市古砲台12.jpg]]」,你是在船上拍照,砲台不會在海上,而且這二張[[:File:基隆市古砲台13.jpg]]、[[:File:基隆市古砲台14.jpg]]也都在船上拍照,所以我想問你在哪裡拍的?--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
我看這張照片「[[:File:基隆市古砲台12.jpg]]」,你是在船上拍照,砲台不會在海上,而且這二張[[:File:基隆市古砲台13.jpg]]、[[:File:基隆市古砲台14.jpg]]也都在船上拍照,所以我想問你在哪裡拍的?--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
:{{ping|林高志}} 我在等候你的答覆--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


== About [[:File:新北市淡水47.jpg]] and [[:File:新北市淡水48.jpg]] ==
== About [[:File:新北市淡水47.jpg]] and [[:File:新北市淡水48.jpg]] ==

Revision as of 16:25, 26 March 2018

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 林高志!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:大安區和平東路1段187號.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 23:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep it!

This is a very important photo, Please keep it, Thank You!

See [1] --223.140.155.50 11:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:大龍峒保安宮11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Outlookxp (talk) 08:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

保安宮廖董事長親自授權可函證

File:大龍峒保安宮 投影片1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Outlookxp (talk) 08:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


保安宮廖董事長親自授權可函證

File:宜蘭棲蘭山檜木林23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2017-11-24 順益臺灣原住民博物館 林迺翁畫像.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2017-11-24 順益臺灣原住民博物館 林迺翁畫像.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruthven (msg) 10:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:中國山西平遙古蹟707.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:法國羅浮宮30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 20:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵109.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

-- Kulmalukko (talk) 13:23, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵75.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵77.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵147.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

-- Kulmalukko (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵146.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵74.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵79.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:泰姬瑪哈陵114.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

关于您上传的条目

在下注意到您向共享资源中上传了大量的云南图片,首先感谢您的贡献,不过大部分图片没有归到合适的分类下,或者图片名称也有错误,比如File:中國昆明154.jpg,该图片是大理市的天镜阁,不应该归到昆明分类下。请您下次上传前注意图片的拍摄地点及事物,并将之归到合适的分类下。谢谢--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

请务必复核您上传的所有图片,我不能确认我对您上传图片拍摄地点分类的判断是否正确,疑似涉及昆明大理宜宾两省三地市。--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

基隆嶼

我知道你有登島,但是我對你「沒有登島」時所拍攝的照片有疑問:分不清楚哪些照片是在基隆拍的,哪些是在新北市拍的。請看以下照片:

@林高志: 我在等候你的答覆--Kai3952 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

我看這張照片「File:基隆市古砲台12.jpg」,你是在船上拍照,砲台不會在海上,而且這二張File:基隆市古砲台13.jpgFile:基隆市古砲台14.jpg也都在船上拍照,所以我想問你在哪裡拍的?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@林高志: 我在等候你的答覆--Kai3952 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

我看到你上傳時照片是添加「New Taipei City」類別,你看:[2][3]。這太誇張了,你跑去桃園景福宮拍攝的,怎麼會當成是在新北市?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]