User talk:89.226.117.72: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=Please Cease= |
=Please Cease= |
||
No one ever said anything about "banning medical or educational photos". However, people who have seriously thought about the purpose of Commons generally agree that poor-quality cellphone photos which |
No one ever said anything about "banning medical or educational photos". However, people who have seriously thought about the purpose of Commons generally agree that poor-quality cellphone photos which drunken users take of their genitals have no real place here. Furthermore, vandalistically blanking a template resolves absolutely nothing whatsoever. If you think policy is on your side, then you should go through normal processes to properly nominate it for deletion... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:59, 8 February 2009
Nopenis
Commons does not require more because it has enough. Platonides (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Please peruse COM:SCOPE with attentiveness to detail... AnonMoos (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Please Cease
No one ever said anything about "banning medical or educational photos". However, people who have seriously thought about the purpose of Commons generally agree that poor-quality cellphone photos which drunken users take of their genitals have no real place here. Furthermore, vandalistically blanking a template resolves absolutely nothing whatsoever. If you think policy is on your side, then you should go through normal processes to properly nominate it for deletion... AnonMoos (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)