ClueBot NG Report Interface

-ID:
+4288942
-User:
+.200.149.130
-Article:
+Sugar tit
-Diff:
+Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
Inline

				
				
				
				
				
				Revision as of 08:32, 16 March 2023 edit
Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots
5,225,654 edits
 Misc citation tidying. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_CommandLine
← Previous edit
				Revision as of 19:06, 11 December 2023 edit undo
67.200.149.130 (talk)
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Next edit →
				

  Line 1:
  Line 1:


  
  {{About|the baby accessory|the communities in the United States|Sugartit, Kentucky|and|Sugar Tit, South Carolina}}
  
  {{About|the baby accessory|the communities in the United States|Sugartit, Kentucky|and|Sugar Tit, South Carolina}}


  
  ⚫
  '''Smil sack ''soska'' (со́ска); there, the term "flower", as used colloquially by mothers, refers to a bloom of mold in the child's mouth caused by decay of the contents. <ref>David Ransel [https://books.google.com/books?id=LpUncmF-megC&dq=russian+soska+pacifier&pg=PA29 "Village Mothers: three generations of change in Russia and Tataria"], 28-29</ref> 


  
  '''Sugar tit''' is a folk name for a baby [[pacifier]], or dummy, that was once commonly made and used in North America and Britain. It was made by placing a spoonful of [[sugar]], or honey, in a small patch of clean cloth, then gathering the cloth around the sugar and twisting it to form a bulb. The bulb was then secured by twine or a rubber band. The baby's saliva would slowly dissolve the sugar in the bulb. 
  


  
  

  


  ⚫
  In use the exposed outfolded fabric could give the appearance of a [[flower]] in the baby's mouth. David Ransel quotes a Russian study by Dr. N. E. Kushev while discussing a similar home-made cloth-and-food pacifier called a ''soska'' (со́ска); there, the term "flower", as used colloquially by mothers, refers to a bloom of mold in the child's mouth caused by decay of the contents. <ref>David Ransel [https://books.google.com/books?id=LpUncmF-megC&dq=russian+soska+pacifier&pg=PA29 "Village Mothers: three generations of change in Russia and Tataria"], 28-29</ref> 
  


  
  

  
  



  
  As early as 1802 a German physician, Christian Struve, described the sugar tit as "one of the most revolting customs".<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1093/shm/8.2.231|title = Dummies and the Health of Hertfordshire Infants, 1911–1930|journal = Social History of Medicine|volume = 8|issue = 2|pages = 231–255|year = 1995|last1 = Gale|first1 = Catharine R.|last2 = Martyn|first2 = Christopher N.|pmid = 11639807}}</ref>
  
  As early as 1802 a German physician, Christian Struve, described the sugar tit as "one of the most revolting customs".<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1093/shm/8.2.231|title = Dummies and the Health of Hertfordshire Infants, 1911–1930|journal = Social History of Medicine|volume = 8|issue = 2|pages = 231–255|year = 1995|last1 = Gale|first1 = Catharine R.|last2 = Martyn|first2 = Christopher N.|pmid = 11639807}}</ref>
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{About|the baby accessory|the communities in the United States|Sugartit, Kentucky|and|Sugar Tit, South Carolina}}
+'''Smil sack ''soska'' (со́ска); there, the term "flower", as used colloquially by mothers, refers to a bloom of mold in the child's mouth caused by decay of the contents. <ref>David Ransel [https://books.google.com/books?id=LpUncmF-megC&dq=russian+soska+pacifier&pg=PA29 "Village Mothers: three generations of change in Russia and Tataria"], 28-29</ref>
-'''Sugar tit''' is a folk name for a baby [[pacifier]], or dummy, that was once commonly made and used in North America and Britain. It was made by placing a spoonful of [[sugar]], or honey, in a small patch of clean cloth, then gathering the cloth around the sugar and twisting it to form a bulb. The bulb was then secured by twine or a rubber band. The baby's saliva would slowly dissolve the sugar in the bulb.
-In use the exposed outfolded fabric could give the appearance of a [[flower]] in the baby's mouth. David Ransel quotes a Russian study by Dr. N. E. Kushev while discussing a similar home-made cloth-and-food pacifier called a ''soska'' (со́ска); there, the term "flower", as used colloquially by mothers, refers to a bloom of mold in the child's mouth caused by decay of the contents. <ref>David Ransel [https://books.google.com/books?id=LpUncmF-megC&dq=russian+soska+pacifier&pg=PA29 "Village Mothers: three generations of change in Russia and Tataria"], 28-29</ref>
 As early as 1802 a German physician, Christian Struve, described the sugar tit as "one of the most revolting customs".<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1093/shm/8.2.231|title = Dummies and the Health of Hertfordshire Infants, 1911–1930|journal = Social History of Medicine|volume = 8|issue = 2|pages = 231–255|year = 1995|last1 = Gale|first1 = Catharine R.|last2 = Martyn|first2 = Christopher N.|pmid = 11639807}}</ref>
-Reason:
+ANN scored at 0.953785
 Your username:
-Reverted:
+Yes
-Comment
(optional):
+Note: Comments are completely optional.  You do not have to justify your edit.
If this is a false positive, then you're right, and the bot is wrong - you don't need to explain why.

ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Report

Navigation