cern.ch

Study of charmonium production via the decay to $p\bar{p}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 13 \rm{TeV}$

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Abstract

Charmonium production cross-section in proton-proton collisions is measured at the centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=13 TeV$ using decays to $p\bar{p}$ final state. The study is performed using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $2.2 {fb}^{-1}$ collected in 2018 with the $LHCb$ detector. The production cross-section of the $\eta_c$ meson is measured in a rapidity range of $2.0 < y < 4.0$ and in a transverse momentum range of $5.0 < p_{T} < 20.0 {GeV/\it{c}}$, which is extended compared with previous $LHCb$ analyses. The differential cross-section is measured in bins of $p_{T}$ and, for the first time, of $y$. Upper limits, at 90 and 95 confidence levels, on the $\eta_c(2S)$ and $h_c(1P)$ prompt production cross-sections are determined for the first time.

Figures and captions

Distribution of the $p\bar{p}$ mass for (left) prompt and (right) $b$-decays samples. The results of the fits using the configuration to study the $\eta_c(2S)$ prompt production are overlaid. Red arrows show invariant mass of charmonium states in the following order: $\eta_c$, $J/\psi$, $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, $h_c(1P)$, $\chi_{c2}$, $\eta_c(2S)$ and $\psi(2S)$ states. The lower panel shows the data and the fit model with the background subtracted.

Fig1.pdf [323 KiB]
HiDef png [461 KiB]
Thumbnail [260 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1.pdf

The log-likelihood profile plots for the (black dashed line) baseline fit and alternative fits including: (red dashed line) alternative mass resolution model, (green and blue dashed lines) alternative models of combinatorial background, (orange dashed line) alternative resolution ratio, (magenta dashed line) alternative contribution from partially reconstructed $J/\psi\rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^{0}$ decay, and (cyan dashed line) accounting for the nonzero $J/\psi$ polarisation. The black solid line represents the log-likelihood profile obtained using the discrete profiling method \cite{Dauncey:2014xga}. The solid red and green lines show Bayesian upper limits on (left) $\eta_c(2S)$ and (right) relative $\eta_c(2S)$ to $J/\psi$ prompt-production cross-section at 90% and 95% CL, respectively.

Fig2.pdf [271 KiB]
HiDef png [315 KiB]
Thumbnail [173 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2.pdf

The log-likelihood profile plots for the (black dashed line) baseline fit and alternative fits including: (red dashed line) alternative mass resolution model, (green and blue dashed lines) alternative models of combinatorial background, (orange dashed line) alternative resolution ratio, (magenta dashed line) alternative contribution from partially reconstructed $J/\psi\rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^{0}$ decay, and (cyan dashed line) accounting for the nonzero $J/\psi$ polarisation. The black solid line represents the log-likelihood profile obtained using the discrete profiling method \cite{Dauncey:2014xga}. The solid red and green lines show Bayesian upper limits on (left) $h_c(1P)$ and (right) relative $h_c(1P)$ to $J/\psi$ prompt-production cross-section at 90% and 95% CL, respectively.

Fig3.pdf [276 KiB]
HiDef png [317 KiB]
Thumbnail [170 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3.pdf

Left: measured $\eta_c$ to $J/\psi$ cross-section ratio at different centre-of-mass energies. Right: measured $\eta_c$ and $J/\psi$ \cite{LHCb-PAPER-2013-008,LHCb-PAPER-2013-016,LHCb-PAPER-2015-037} prompt production cross-sections. The red points show the result from the current analysis. The error bars show following uncertainties: statistical, systematic, and due to the $J/\psi\rightarrow p\bar{p}$ and $\eta _ c \rightarrow p\bar{p}$ branching fractions (and $J/\psi$ production cross-section for the absolute production cross-section).

Fig4.pdf [48 KiB]
HiDef png [180 KiB]
Thumbnail [107 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4.pdf

Measured $\eta_c$ to $J/\psi$ prompt-production cross-section ratio in intervals of (left) $p_{\rm{T}}$ and (right) $y$. The error bars show following uncertainties: statistical, systematic, and due to the branching fractions $\mathcal{B} _{J/\psi\rightarrow p\bar{p}}$ and $\mathcal{B} _{\eta _ c \rightarrow p\bar{p}}$ uncertainties. The result of the fit with a linear function for $p_{\rm{T}}$-differential cross-section is overlaid.

Fig5.pdf [97 KiB]
HiDef png [95 KiB]
Thumbnail [55 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5.pdf

Measurement of the differential prompt production cross-section of the (red) $\eta_c$ and (blue) $J/\psi$ mesons \cite{LHCb-PAPER-2015-037} in bins of (left) $p_{\rm{T}}$- and (right) $y$. The error bars show following uncertainties for $\eta_c$ production: statistical, systematic, and the uncertainty due to the $J/\psi\rightarrow p\bar{p}$ and $\eta _ c \rightarrow p\bar{p}$ branching fractions and $J/\psi$ production cross-section. The results of the fits with exponential functions are overlaid.

Fig6.pdf [106 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [142 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6.pdf

Measurement of the (left) absolute $\eta_c$ and (right) relative $\eta_c$ to $J/\psi$ $p_{\rm{T}}$-differential prompt-production cross-section. Magenta boxes represent NLO NRQCD CS prediction; green boxes show the sum of NLO NRQCD CS and CO predictions. Blue lines represent the modified NRQCD prediction \cite{Biswal:2023mwu}.

Fig7.pdf [103 KiB]
HiDef png [310 KiB]
Thumbnail [182 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2024-004.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2024-004.gif

Tables and captions

Treatment of the parameters in the mass fits for the different studies. Parameters are fixed or constrained to their known values \cite{PDG2022}.

Table_1.pdf [107 KiB]
HiDef png [37 KiB]
Thumbnail [13 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to the $ p \overline p $ mass distributions for combined prompt and $ b $ -decays data sample. Yields are restricted to be positive with symmetric uncertainties presented. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Table_2.pdf [100 KiB]
HiDef png [73 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Ratios of the observed $\eta _ c $ to $ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi }$ yields corrected for cross-contamination for prompt production and production in $ b $ -hadron decays in bins of transverse momentum $ p_{\mathrm{T}}$ . The uncertainties are statistical.

Table_3.pdf [105 KiB]
HiDef png [108 KiB]
Thumbnail [53 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Ratios of the observed $\eta _ c $ to $ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi }$ yields mesons corrected for cross-contamination for prompt production and production in $ b $ -hadron decays in bins of rapidity $ y $ . The uncertainties are statistical.

Table_4.pdf [96 KiB]
HiDef png [75 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Relative uncertainties (in %) on the ratio of prompt cross-sections $\sigma^{p}_{\eta _ c }/\sigma^{p}_{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } }$. Uncertainties on $\mathcal{B} _{\eta _ c \rightarrow p \overline p }$ and $\mathcal{B} _{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } \rightarrow p \overline p }$ measurements are considered separately and given in the text.

Table_5.pdf [109 KiB]
HiDef png [103 KiB]
Thumbnail [52 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Upper limits at 90% and 95% CL for the $\eta _ c {(2S)}$ and $ h _ c {(1P)}$ prompt production cross-sections and their ratios to that of the $ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi }$ meson, extracted using a Bayesian approach.

Table_6.pdf [115 KiB]
HiDef png [55 KiB]
Thumbnail [26 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Upper limits (UL) at 95% CL for $\eta _ c {(2S)}$ relative to $ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi }$ and $\eta _ c {(2S)}$ absolute prompt production cross-section, and its comparison with NLO NRQCD theoretical prediction (Ref. \cite{Lansberg:2017ozx,Shao:2014yta,Gong:2012ug,Bodwin:2015iua}).

Table_7.pdf [126 KiB]
HiDef png [58 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Branching fractions of $\chi _{ c J}$ production in inclusive $ b $ -hadron decays. The quoted uncertainties are statistical, systematic and the related to the $\mathcal{B} _{\chi _{ c J} \rightarrow p \overline p }$, $\mathcal{B} _{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } \rightarrow p \overline p }$, and $\mathcal{B} _{ b \rightarrow { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } X }$ uncertainties. The values are compared with results from analysis of charmonia production using decays to $\phi\phi$ \cite{LHCb-PAPER-2017-007} and the world average values \cite{PDG2022}.

Table_8.pdf [131 KiB]
HiDef png [39 KiB]
Thumbnail [18 KiB]
tex code
Table_8.pdf

Relative uncertainties (in %) on the ratio of prompt cross-sections $\sigma_{\eta _ c }/\sigma_{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } }$ in bins of the $\eta _ c $ transverse momentum, $ p_{\mathrm{T}}$ . Uncertainties on $\mathcal{B} _{\eta _ c \rightarrow p \overline p }$ and $\mathcal{B} _{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } \rightarrow p \overline p }$ are considered separately and given in the text.

Table_9.pdf [110 KiB]
HiDef png [70 KiB]
Thumbnail [30 KiB]
tex code
Table_9.pdf

Relative uncertainties (in %) on the ratio of prompt cross-sections $\sigma_{\eta _ c }/\sigma_{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } }$ in bins of the $\eta _ c $ rapidity, $ y $ . Uncertainties on $\mathcal{B} _{\eta _ c \rightarrow p \overline p }$ and $\mathcal{B} _{ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi } \rightarrow p \overline p }$ are considered separately and given in the text.

Table_10.pdf [109 KiB]
HiDef png [87 KiB]
Thumbnail [39 KiB]
tex code
Table_10.pdf

Relative $ p_{\mathrm{T}}$ -differential $\eta _ c $ prompt production cross-section.

Table_11.pdf [104 KiB]
HiDef png [125 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB]
tex code
Table_11.pdf

Relative $ y $ -differential $\eta _ c $ prompt production cross-section.

Table_12.pdf [95 KiB]
HiDef png [64 KiB]
Thumbnail [35 KiB]
tex code
Table_12.pdf

Absolute $ p_{\mathrm{T}}$ -differential $\eta _ c $ prompt production cross-section.

Table_13.pdf [104 KiB]
HiDef png [84 KiB]
Thumbnail [44 KiB]
tex code
Table_13.pdf

Absolute $ y $ -differential $\eta _ c $ prompt production cross-section.

Table_14.pdf [95 KiB]
HiDef png [72 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB]
tex code
Table_14.pdf

Created on 09 August 2024.