Bug 2294379 - Review Request: python-pyogrio - Vectorized spatial vector file format I/O using GDAL/OGR
Summary: Review Request: python-pyogrio - Vectorized spatial vector file format I/O us...
Keywords:
Status: RELEASE_PENDING
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Lemenkov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/geopandas/pyogrio
Whiteboard:
: 2305648 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 2295479
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-06-26 08:59 UTC by Elliott Sales de Andrade
Modified: 2024-08-20 08:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
lemenkov: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2024-06-26 08:59:03 UTC
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pyogrio/python-pyogrio.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pyogrio/python-pyogrio-0.9.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
Pyogrio provides a GeoPandas-oriented API to OGR vector data sources, such as
ESRI Shapefile, GeoPackage, and GeoJSON. Vector data sources have geometries,
such as points, lines, or polygons, and associated records with potentially
many columns worth of data.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-06-26 09:01:54 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7670979
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2294379-python-pyogrio/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07670979-python-pyogrio/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2024-08-15 11:18:50 UTC
I'll review it.

Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2024-08-15 14:48:03 UTC
Few notes:

* I have a header in your package - /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/arrow_bridge.h. Not sure what is it. Could you elaborate?
* Interestingly but that header also licensed under a different license - ASL 2.0 so your %license field has to be "MIT and Apache-2.0"
* (Not a blocker) Patches should be commented (like for example "# Fedora-specific, nothing to see here") or links to upstream PRs/MRs should be provided.

Please comment/address them and we'll finish it.

I don't see any issues so here is my formal

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

Issues:
=======
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: python3-pyogrio : /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-
  packages/pyogrio/arrow_bridge.h
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages

^^^ See my note above.

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage but it's ok
      for arch-dependent Python packages.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file MUST match the actual license.
     See my note above.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package does not contain desktop file (not a GUI application).
[-]: No development files (also see my note about header hile above).
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: Not a rename of another package.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package does not contain systemd file.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 3093 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: I did not test if the package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged (0.9.0).
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x/!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified. See my note above.
[-]: Sources were not verified with gpgverify (upstream does not
     publish signatures).
[?]: I dod not check if the package compiles and builds into binary rpms
     on all supported architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-pyogrio-0.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          python-pyogrio-debugsource-0.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          python-pyogrio-0.9.0-1.fc41.src.rpm
========================================================================================================================================= rpmlint session starts ========================================================================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp1mkjgisx')]
checks: 32, packages: 3

python3-pyogrio.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_io.pxd
python-pyogrio.src: E: spelling-error ('Vectorized', 'Summary(en_US) Vectorized -> Factorized, Vectored')
python3-pyogrio.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('Vectorized', 'Summary(en_US) Vectorized -> Factorized, Vectored')
python3-pyogrio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/arrow_bridge.h
=================================================================================================== 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings, 14 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 2.5 s ===================================================================================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

python3-pyogrio.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_io.pxd
python3-pyogrio.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('Vectorized', 'Summary(en_US) Vectorized -> Factorized, Vectored')
python3-pyogrio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/arrow_bridge.h
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings, 10 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 2.2 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
python3-pyogrio: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_err.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
python3-pyogrio: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_geometry.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
python3-pyogrio: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_io.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
python3-pyogrio: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_ogr.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
python3-pyogrio: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/_vsi.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/pyogrio/pyogrio-0.9.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 6a6fa2e8cf95b3d4a7c0fac48bce6e5037579e28d3eb33b53349d6e11f15e5a8
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6a6fa2e8cf95b3d4a7c0fac48bce6e5037579e28d3eb33b53349d6e11f15e5a8


Requires
--------
python3-pyogrio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgdal.so.35()(64bit)
    python(abi)
    python3.13dist(certifi)
    python3.13dist(numpy)
    python3.13dist(packaging)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

python-pyogrio-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
python3-pyogrio:
    python-pyogrio
    python3-pyogrio
    python3-pyogrio(x86-64)
    python3.13-pyogrio
    python3.13dist(pyogrio)
    python3dist(pyogrio)

python-pyogrio-debugsource:
    python-pyogrio-debugsource
    python-pyogrio-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2294379
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: fonts, Haskell, PHP, R, Perl, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Java
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 4 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2024-08-19 00:20:26 UTC
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #3)
> Few notes:
> 
> * I have a header in your package -
> /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/pyogrio/arrow_bridge.h. Not sure what is
> it. Could you elaborate?

It seems likely this is a mistake, but I have asked upstream about it:
https://github.com/geopandas/pyogrio/issues/433#issuecomment-2295434424

> * Interestingly but that header also licensed under a different license -
> ASL 2.0 so your %license field has to be "MIT and Apache-2.0"

I updated the license to include the header license as well for now, and can drop it later if it goes away.
I also updated the license to include the data files.

> * (Not a blocker) Patches should be commented (like for example "#
> Fedora-specific, nothing to see here") or links to upstream PRs/MRs should
> be provided.

Comments added.

Also added a missing test dependency.

Comment 6 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2024-08-19 00:23:24 UTC
*** Bug 2305648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Peter Lemenkov 2024-08-20 07:51:08 UTC
Ok, I don't see any other issues so this package is

================
=== APPROVED ===
================

Comment 8 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2024-08-20 08:16:33 UTC
Thank you for the review, Peter

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-08-20 08:16:43 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyogrio


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.