Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/jsemver.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/jsemver-0.9.0-16.fc38.src.rpm Description: A Java implementation of the Semantic Versioning Specification Fedora Account System Username: mikep This package was retired, and I would like to take ownership of it. The only changes I made were to build against the newer Java ABI and drop the maven-javadoc-plugin dependency. COPR repository: [copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:mikep:lulzbot] name=Copr repo for lulzbot owned by mikep baseurl=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mikep/lulzbot/fedora-$releasever-$basearch/ type=rpm-md skip_if_unavailable=True gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mikep/lulzbot/pubkey.gpg repo_gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 enabled_metadata=1
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/jsemver.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/jsemver-0.9.0-1.fc38.src.rpm - Use %autorelease/%autochangelog - Use SPDX
This is an unofficial review as I am not in the packager group yet. > Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/java/jsemver > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_duplicate_files This issue seems a false positive as /usr/share/java/jsemver and /usr/share/maven-poms/jsemver both are folders with the same name but contain different files. This can be ignored. > License file ADDITIONAL_LICENSE_INFO is not marked as %license > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text File seems to mention additional licensing requirements regarding an exception to the GPLv2 (GNU Classpath Exception). Please verify how this affects licensing and if acceptable to use mark it as %license under %files.