Plasma TVs: The SUVs of the Living Room

That sleek flat-panel TV may look small, but it could well be a big power hog.

When the Australian government wanted to create a six-star system to rate the energy efficiency of television sets, it found that most of the big plasma sets wouldn’t meet its minimum requirements. They could be banned as a result.

This is bad news for Panasonic and other makers of plasma sets, which have been losing ground to LCD sets recently anyway. The Australian report said some LCD sets would fail its test as well.

The standards in the United States don’t seem to be as strict, but government tests show that plasma sets are more likely to be energy hogs. According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Web site, 153 LCD models that are 36 inches and larger have earned its EnergyStar certification, compared to only 83 plasma sets.

The problem is hardly new. In 2005, the Natural Resources Defense Council warned in a report that television energy use in the United States was set to increase 50 percent from 2004 to 2009.

And earlier this month, the International Electrotechnical Commission, a Geneva-based group that publishes energy standards, released what Reuters called “the world’s most boring television show,” a ten-minute series of shapes and colors that is meant to be used to measure the efficiency of plasma and LCD sets.

The Greentechmedia blog reported that the E.P.A. is looking at using this test for new tougher EnergyStar standards in the United States. If the agency reaches the same conclusion that its Australian counterpart did, you may want to think twice about inviting your Prius-driving friends to watch the next Live Earth concert on your giant plasma set.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

H to the E to the L-L NO!

I love this planet. I drive as little as possible so I my car won’t emit too much CO2. All the bulbs in my house have been florescent bulbs since before it was cool to have them. I conserve water and do a bunch of other things to help my planet, Earth. But don’t ANYONE even think about touching my plasma TV. If plasma and LCD TVs are going to be the reason for global warming, then so be it.

If my “Prius-driving friends” have a problem with my TV, they can stay home. And if they cop an attitude and try to lecture me on it, I will be glad to remind them that the Prius’ gas millage is worst than the 1996 Geo Metro and that they are a bunch of hypocrites who overpaid for the car because, what they really want to do is drive alone in the carpool lane during rush hour.

So, how many watts are we talking about here?

How do LCDs and Plasma TVs compare to other household items like ovens, fridges, boilers, etc?

What is it with all these short articles? Can we please have a bit more info. A little bit more research would nice.

The future is in OLED.

I concur with the last two posts – where’s the numbers? This is typical nytimes schlock.

“Save the earth, kill yourself.” That’s from a car sticker I saw recently.

Leave Saul alone! This is the technology bits blog, not the technology in-depth blog.

The report from Digital Cenergy was not made available for the press to read. The press only got the recommendations Go
HERE if you want to know more on this story; but you won’t get wattage info, or side by side comparison between plasma and fridge there either.

> but you won’t get wattage info, or side by side comparison between plasma and fridge there either.

Why not? Why is it ALWAYS a problem to get info on anything?

God forbid any publisher put any REAL information anywhere these days, they might offend an advertiser somehow, or a shareholder of one of those advertisers !

What ever happened to TELLING THE TRUTH ?

Obviously there is little information. Eventhough technology has been a great cause for global warming, dont but plasma TV please if you care about this planet