Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions using the ATLAS detector

A search for the electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two electrons or muons is presented. The analysis is based on 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. Three $R$-parity-conserving scenarios where the lightest neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle are considered: the production of chargino pairs with decays via either $W$ bosons or sleptons, and the direct production of slepton pairs. The analysis is optimised for the first of these scenarios, but the results are also interpreted in the others. No significant deviations from the Standard Model expectations are observed and limits at 95 % confidence level are set on the masses of relevant supersymmetric particles in each of the scenarios. For a massless lightest neutralino, masses up to 420 GeV are excluded for the production of the lightest-chargino pairs assuming $W$-boson-mediated decays and up to 1 TeV for slepton-mediated decays, whereas for slepton-pair production, masses up to 700 GeV are excluded assuming three generations of mass-degenerate sleptons.

21 August 2019

Contact: SUSY conveners internal

Figures

Figure 01a


Diagrams of the supersymmetric models considered, with two leptons and weakly interacting particles in the final state: (a) χ1+χ1- production with W-boson-mediated decays, (b) χ1+χ1- production with slepton/sneutrino-mediated-decays and (c) slepton pair production. In the model with intermediate sleptons, all three flavours (e, μ, τ) are included, while only e and μ are included in the direct slepton model. In the final state, ℓ stands for an electron or muon, which can be produced directly or, in the case of (a) and (b) only, via a leptonically decaying τ-lepton with additional neutrinos.

png (15kB)  pdf (5kB) 

Figure 01b


Diagrams of the supersymmetric models considered, with two leptons and weakly interacting particles in the final state: (a) χ1+χ1- production with W-boson-mediated decays, (b) χ1+χ1- production with slepton/sneutrino-mediated-decays and (c) slepton pair production. In the model with intermediate sleptons, all three flavours (e, μ, τ) are included, while only e and μ are included in the direct slepton model. In the final state, ℓ stands for an electron or muon, which can be produced directly or, in the case of (a) and (b) only, via a leptonically decaying τ-lepton with additional neutrinos.

png (152kB)  pdf (60kB) 

Figure 01c


Diagrams of the supersymmetric models considered, with two leptons and weakly interacting particles in the final state: (a) χ1+χ1- production with W-boson-mediated decays, (b) χ1+χ1- production with slepton/sneutrino-mediated-decays and (c) slepton pair production. In the model with intermediate sleptons, all three flavours (e, μ, τ) are included, while only e and μ are included in the direct slepton model. In the final state, ℓ stands for an electron or muon, which can be produced directly or, in the case of (a) and (b) only, via a leptonically decaying τ-lepton with additional neutrinos.

png (11kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 02a


Distributions of mT2 in (a) CR-VZ and (b) CR-top and (c) ETmiss in CR-WW for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (157kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 02b


Distributions of mT2 in (a) CR-VZ and (b) CR-top and (c) ETmiss in CR-WW for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (150kB)  pdf (17kB) 

Figure 02c


Distributions of mT2 in (a) CR-VZ and (b) CR-top and (c) ETmiss in CR-WW for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (144kB)  pdf (17kB) 

Figure 03a


Distributions of mT2 in (a) VR-top-low and (b) VR-top-high, ETmiss in (c) VR-WW-0J and (d) VR-WW-1J, and ETmiss significance in (e) VR-VZ and (f) VR-top-WW, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (141kB)  pdf (17kB) 

Figure 03b


Distributions of mT2 in (a) VR-top-low and (b) VR-top-high, ETmiss in (c) VR-WW-0J and (d) VR-WW-1J, and ETmiss significance in (e) VR-VZ and (f) VR-top-WW, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (149kB)  pdf (17kB) 

Figure 03c


Distributions of mT2 in (a) VR-top-low and (b) VR-top-high, ETmiss in (c) VR-WW-0J and (d) VR-WW-1J, and ETmiss significance in (e) VR-VZ and (f) VR-top-WW, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (160kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 03d


Distributions of mT2 in (a) VR-top-low and (b) VR-top-high, ETmiss in (c) VR-WW-0J and (d) VR-WW-1J, and ETmiss significance in (e) VR-VZ and (f) VR-top-WW, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (160kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 03e


Distributions of mT2 in (a) VR-top-low and (b) VR-top-high, ETmiss in (c) VR-WW-0J and (d) VR-WW-1J, and ETmiss significance in (e) VR-VZ and (f) VR-top-WW, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (148kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 03f


Distributions of mT2 in (a) VR-top-low and (b) VR-top-high, ETmiss in (c) VR-WW-0J and (d) VR-WW-1J, and ETmiss significance in (e) VR-VZ and (f) VR-top-WW, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (143kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 04


The upper panel shows the observed number of events in each of the VRs defined in Table 4, together with the expected SM backgrounds obtained after the background-only fit in the CRs. The shaded band represents the total uncertainty in the expected SM background. The lower panel shows the significance as defined in Ref. [106].

png (61kB)  pdf (30kB) 

Figure 05


The upper panel shows the observed number of events in each of the SRs defined in Table 2, together with the expected SM backgrounds obtained after the background-only fit in the CRs. The shaded band represents the total uncertainty in the expected SM background. The lower panel shows the significance as defined in Ref. [106].

png (108kB)  pdf (45kB) 

Figure 06a


Distributions of mT2 in (a) SR-SF-0J, (b) SR-SF-1J, (c) SR-DF-0J and (d) SR-DF-1J, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (153kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 06b


Distributions of mT2 in (a) SR-SF-0J, (b) SR-SF-1J, (c) SR-DF-0J and (d) SR-DF-1J, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (159kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 06c


Distributions of mT2 in (a) SR-SF-0J, (b) SR-SF-1J, (c) SR-DF-0J and (d) SR-DF-1J, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (154kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 06d


Distributions of mT2 in (a) SR-SF-0J, (b) SR-SF-1J, (c) SR-DF-0J and (d) SR-DF-1J, for data and the estimated SM backgrounds. The normalisation factors extracted from the corresponding CRs are used to rescale the tt̄, single-top-quark, WW, WZ and ZZ backgrounds. The FNP lepton background is calculated using the data-driven matrix method. Negligible background contributions are not included in the legends. The uncertainty band includes systematic and statistical errors from all sources and the last bin includes the overflow. Distributions for three benchmark signal points are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the SM background estimate.

png (160kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 07a


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with (a) W-boson-mediated decays and (b) slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays, and (c) for slepton-pair production. In Figure (b) all three slepton flavours (e, μ, τ) are considered, while only e and μ are considered in Figure (c). The observed (solid thick line) and expected (thin dashed line) exclusion contours are indicated. The upper shaded band corresponds to the ± 1 σ variations in the expected limit, including all uncertainties except theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines around the observed limit illustrate the change in the observed limit as the nominal signal cross-section is scaled up and down by the theoretical uncertainty. The blue line in (b) corresponds to the observed limit for ℓL projected into this model for the chosen slepton mass hypothesis (slepton masses midway between the mass of the chargino and that of the χ10). All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (lower shaded areas) [23,24].

png (177kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07b


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with (a) W-boson-mediated decays and (b) slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays, and (c) for slepton-pair production. In Figure (b) all three slepton flavours (e, μ, τ) are considered, while only e and μ are considered in Figure (c). The observed (solid thick line) and expected (thin dashed line) exclusion contours are indicated. The upper shaded band corresponds to the ± 1 σ variations in the expected limit, including all uncertainties except theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines around the observed limit illustrate the change in the observed limit as the nominal signal cross-section is scaled up and down by the theoretical uncertainty. The blue line in (b) corresponds to the observed limit for ℓL projected into this model for the chosen slepton mass hypothesis (slepton masses midway between the mass of the chargino and that of the χ10). All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (lower shaded areas) [23,24].

png (190kB)  pdf (20kB) 

Figure 07c


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for chargino-pair production with (a) W-boson-mediated decays and (b) slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays, and (c) for slepton-pair production. In Figure (b) all three slepton flavours (e, μ, τ) are considered, while only e and μ are considered in Figure (c). The observed (solid thick line) and expected (thin dashed line) exclusion contours are indicated. The upper shaded band corresponds to the ± 1 σ variations in the expected limit, including all uncertainties except theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines around the observed limit illustrate the change in the observed limit as the nominal signal cross-section is scaled up and down by the theoretical uncertainty. The blue line in (b) corresponds to the observed limit for ℓL projected into this model for the chosen slepton mass hypothesis (slepton masses midway between the mass of the chargino and that of the χ10). All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (lower shaded areas) [23,24].

png (160kB)  pdf (8kB) 

Figure 08a


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for (a) direct selectron production and (b) direct smuon production. In Figure (a) the observed (solid thick lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion contours are indicated for combined eL,R and for eL and eR. In Figure (b) the observed (solid thick lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion contours are indicated for combined μL,R and for μL and μR. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown in the shaded areas [24].

png (177kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Figure 08b


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for (a) direct selectron production and (b) direct smuon production. In Figure (a) the observed (solid thick lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion contours are indicated for combined eL,R and for eL and eR. In Figure (b) the observed (solid thick lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion contours are indicated for combined μL,R and for μL and μR. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown in the shaded areas [24].

png (177kB)  pdf (18kB) 

Tables

Table 01


Simulated background event samples with the corresponding matrix element and parton shower (PS) generators, cross-section order in αs used to normalise the event yield, underlying-event tune and the generator PDF sets used.

png (38kB)  pdf (67kB) 

Table 02


The definitions of the binned and inclusive signal regions. Relevant kinematic variables are defined in the text. The bins labelled `DF' or `SF' refer to signal regions with different lepton flavour or same lepton flavour pair combinations, respectively, and the `0J' and `1J' labels refer to the multiplicity of non-b-tagged jets.

png (25kB)  pdf (63kB) 

Table 03


Control region definitions for extracting normalisation factors for the dominant background processes. `DF' or `SF' refer to signal regions with different lepton flavour or same lepton flavour pair combinations, respectively.

png (15kB)  pdf (55kB) 

Table 04


Validation region definitions used to study the modelling of the SM backgrounds. `DF' or `SF' refer to regions with different lepton flavour or same lepton flavour pair combinations, respectively.

png (20kB)  pdf (56kB) 

Table 05


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit in the CRs. For backgrounds with a normalisation extracted from the fit, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also shown. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. tt̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (33kB)  pdf (47kB) 

Table 06


Observed event yields and predicted background yields in the VRs. For backgrounds with a normalisation extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also shown. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. t t̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (45kB)  pdf (55kB) 

Table 07


Summary of the dominant systematic uncertainties in the background estimates in the inclusive SRs requiring mT2>100 GeV after performing the profile likelihood fit. The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add in quadrature to the total background uncertainty. The percentages show the size of the uncertainty relative to the total expected background. `Top theoretical uncertainties' refers to tt̄ theoretical uncertainties and the uncertainty associated with Wt–tt̄ interference added in quadrature.

png (49kB)  pdf (45kB) 

Table 08


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit for the DF inclusive SRs. The model-independent upper limits at 95% CL on the observed and expected numbers of beyond-the-SM events S0.95obs/exp and on the effective beyond-the-SM cross-section σ0.95obs are also shown. The ± 1 σ variations on S0.95exp are also provided. The last row shows the p0-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the p0-value is capped at 0.50. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. t t̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (94kB)  pdf (61kB) 

Table 09


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit for the SF inclusive SRs. The model-independent upper limits at 95% CL on the observed and expected numbers of beyond-the-SM events S0.95obs/exp and on the effective beyond-the-SM cross-section σ0.95obs are also shown. The ± 1 σ variations on S0.95exp are also provided. The last row shows the p0-value of the SM-only hypothesis. For SRs where the data yield is smaller than expected, the p0-value is capped at 0.50. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. t t̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (94kB)  pdf (61kB) 

Auxiliary material

Figure 01


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. Only e and μ are considered. The observed (solid thick lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion contours are indicated for combined ℓL,R and for ℓL and ℓR. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (shaded regions) [24].

png (183kB)  pdf (19kB) 

Figure 02


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models for slepton-pair production. The observed (solid thick lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion contours are indicated for combined ℓL,R, eL,R and μL,R. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (shaded regions) [23].

png (168kB)  pdf (19kB) 

Figure 03a


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models, with upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) overlaid, for chargino-pair production with (a) W-boson-mediated decays and (b) slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays, and (c) for slepton-pair production. In Figure (b) all three slepton flavours (e, μ, τ) are considered, while only e and μ are considered in Figure (c). The observed (solid thick line) and expected (thin dashed line) exclusion contours are indicated. The upper shaded band corresponds to the ± 1 σ variations in the expected limit, including all uncertainties except theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines around the observed limit illustrate the change in the observed limit as the nominal signal cross-section is scaled up and down by the theoretical uncertainty. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (lower shaded areas) [23,109]

png (265kB)  pdf (14kB) 

Figure 03b


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models, with upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) overlaid, for chargino-pair production with (a) W-boson-mediated decays and (b) slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays, and (c) for slepton-pair production. In Figure (b) all three slepton flavours (e, μ, τ) are considered, while only e and μ are considered in Figure (c). The observed (solid thick line) and expected (thin dashed line) exclusion contours are indicated. The upper shaded band corresponds to the ± 1 σ variations in the expected limit, including all uncertainties except theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines around the observed limit illustrate the change in the observed limit as the nominal signal cross-section is scaled up and down by the theoretical uncertainty. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (lower shaded areas) [23,109]

png (224kB)  pdf (16kB) 

Figure 03c


Observed and expected exclusion limits on SUSY simplified models, with upper limits on signal cross-section (fb) overlaid, for chargino-pair production with (a) W-boson-mediated decays and (b) slepton/sneutrino-mediated decays, and (c) for slepton-pair production. In Figure (b) all three slepton flavours (e, μ, τ) are considered, while only e and μ are considered in Figure (c). The observed (solid thick line) and expected (thin dashed line) exclusion contours are indicated. The upper shaded band corresponds to the ± 1 σ variations in the expected limit, including all uncertainties except theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines around the observed limit illustrate the change in the observed limit as the nominal signal cross-section is scaled up and down by the theoretical uncertainty. All limits are computed at 95% CL. The observed limits obtained by ATLAS in previous searches are also shown (lower shaded areas) [23,109]

png (233kB)  pdf (62kB) 

Figure 04a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (234kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (161kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (235kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (157kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (233kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (164kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (235kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 04h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,∞), SR-SF-1J-[100,∞), SR-DF-0J-[100,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[100,∞)

png (167kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (221kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (156kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (220kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (155kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (212kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (153kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (226kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 05h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,∞), SR-SF-1J-[160,∞), SR-DF-0J-[160,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[160,∞)

png (161kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 06a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (190kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 06b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (149kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 06c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (194kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 06d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (152kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 06e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (188kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 06f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (149kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 06g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (194kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 06h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,120), SR-SF-1J-[100,120), SR-DF-0J-[100,120) and SR-SF-1J-[100,120)

png (153kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (202kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (148kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (204kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (152kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (203kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (153kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (201kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 07h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,160), SR-SF-1J-[120,160), SR-DF-0J-[120,160) and SR-SF-1J-[120,160)

png (144kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (191kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (157kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (195kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (161kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (189kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (159kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (195kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 08h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[100,105), SR-SF-1J-[100,105), SR-DF-0J-[100,105) and SR-SF-1J-[100,105)

png (167kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (193kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (155kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (196kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (168kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (191kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (155kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (195kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 09h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[105,110), SR-SF-1J-[105,110), SR-DF-0J-[105,110) and SR-SF-1J-[105,110)

png (164kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (188kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (148kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (197kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (157kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (187kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (152kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (196kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 10h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[110,120), SR-SF-1J-[110,120), SR-DF-0J-[110,120) and SR-SF-1J-[110,120)

png (158kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (188kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (145kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 11c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (191kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (151kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (189kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (149kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (193kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 11h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[120,140), SR-SF-1J-[120,140), SR-DF-0J-[120,140) and SR-SF-1J-[120,140)

png (152kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (190kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (153kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (191kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (155kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (180kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (159kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (187kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 12h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[140,160), SR-SF-1J-[140,160), SR-DF-0J-[140,160) and SR-SF-1J-[140,160)

png (158kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (190kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (155kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (189kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (153kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (190kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (165kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (193kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 13h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[160,180), SR-SF-1J-[160,180), SR-DF-0J-[160,180) and SR-SF-1J-[160,180)

png (158kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (203kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (157kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (200kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (160kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (200kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (154kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (189kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 14h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[180,220), SR-SF-1J-[180,220), SR-DF-0J-[180,220) and SR-SF-1J-[180,220)

png (158kB)  pdf (7kB) 

Figure 15a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (184kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (146kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (177kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (140kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (187kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (147kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (183kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 15h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[220,260), SR-SF-1J-[220,260), SR-DF-0J-[220,260) and SR-SF-1J-[220,260)

png (143kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16a


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (183kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16b


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (137kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16c


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (180kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16d


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (138kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16e


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (183kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16f


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (139kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16g


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (180kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Figure 16h


Signal acceptances (left) and efficiencies (right) for direct χ̃1+χ̃1- pair production with W-boson-mediated decays in SR-SF-0J-[260,∞), SR-SF-1J-[260,∞), SR-DF-0J-[260,∞) and SR-SF-1J-[260,∞)

png (140kB)  pdf (6kB) 

Table 01


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit for the binned DF SRs with nnon- b -tagged jets=0. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also shown. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. tt̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (32kB)  pdf (54kB) 

Table 02


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit for the binned DF SRs with nnon- b -tagged jets=1. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also reported. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. tt̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (31kB)  pdf (54kB) 

Table 03


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit for the binned SF SRs with nnon- b -tagged jets=0. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also shown. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. tt̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (33kB)  pdf (54kB) 

Table 04


Observed event yields and predicted background yields from the fit for the binned SF SRs with nnon- b -tagged jets=1. For backgrounds whose normalisation is extracted from the fit in the CRs, the yield expected from the simulation before the fit is also shown. `Other backgrounds' include the non-dominant background sources, i.e. tt̄+V, Higgs boson and Drell--Yan events. A `--' symbol indicates that the background contribution is negligible.

png (32kB)  pdf (54kB) 

Table 05


Cutflow for supersymmetric model where χ1±χ1 decay via W±W. The masses of the two charginos are 300 GeV, while the mass of χ10 is 50 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139 fb-1.

png (53kB)  pdf (61kB) 

Table 06


Cutflow for supersymmetric model where χ1±χ1 decay via slepton-neutrino/sneutrino-lepton pair. The masses of the two charginos are 600 GeV, while the mass of χ10 is 1 GeV. The slepton/sneutrino masses are 300 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139 fb-1.

png (49kB)  pdf (61kB) 

Table 07


Cutflow for supersymmetric model where ℓℓ are produced. Only e and μ are considered in this model. The masses of the two sleptons are 400 GeV, while the mass of χ10 is 200 GeV. The numbers are normalised to the luminosity of 139 fb-1.

png (47kB)  pdf (61kB)