-
TaskGen: A Task-Based, Memory-Infused Agentic Framework using StrictJSON
Authors:
John Chong Min Tan,
Prince Saroj,
Bharat Runwal,
Hardik Maheshwari,
Brian Lim Yi Sheng,
Richard Cottrill,
Alankrit Chona,
Ambuj Kumar,
Mehul Motani
Abstract:
TaskGen is an open-sourced agentic framework which uses an Agent to solve an arbitrary task by breaking them down into subtasks. Each subtask is mapped to an Equipped Function or another Agent to execute. In order to reduce verbosity (and hence token usage), TaskGen uses StrictJSON that ensures JSON output from the Large Language Model (LLM), along with additional features such as type checking an…
▽ More
TaskGen is an open-sourced agentic framework which uses an Agent to solve an arbitrary task by breaking them down into subtasks. Each subtask is mapped to an Equipped Function or another Agent to execute. In order to reduce verbosity (and hence token usage), TaskGen uses StrictJSON that ensures JSON output from the Large Language Model (LLM), along with additional features such as type checking and iterative error correction. Key to the philosophy of TaskGen is the management of information/memory on a need-to-know basis. We empirically evaluate TaskGen on various environments such as 40x40 dynamic maze navigation with changing obstacle locations (100% solve rate), TextWorld escape room solving with dense rewards and detailed goals (96% solve rate), web browsing (69% of actions successful), solving the MATH dataset (71% solve rate over 100 Level-5 problems), Retrieval Augmented Generation on NaturalQuestions dataset (F1 score of 47.03%)
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
SOUL: Unlocking the Power of Second-Order Optimization for LLM Unlearning
Authors:
Jinghan Jia,
Yihua Zhang,
Yimeng Zhang,
Jiancheng Liu,
Bharat Runwal,
James Diffenderfer,
Bhavya Kailkhura,
Sijia Liu
Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the necessity of effective unlearning mechanisms to comply with data regulations and ethical AI practices. LLM unlearning aims at removing undesired data influences and associated model capabilities without compromising utility beyond the scope of unlearning. While interest in studying LLM unlearning is growing, the impact of the optimizer choice for L…
▽ More
Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the necessity of effective unlearning mechanisms to comply with data regulations and ethical AI practices. LLM unlearning aims at removing undesired data influences and associated model capabilities without compromising utility beyond the scope of unlearning. While interest in studying LLM unlearning is growing, the impact of the optimizer choice for LLM unlearning remains unexplored. In this work, we shed light on the significance of optimizer selection in LLM unlearning for the first time, establishing a clear connection between second-order optimization and influence unlearning (a classical approach using influence functions to update the model for data influence removal). This insight propels us to develop a second-order optimization-based LLM unlearning framework, termed Second-Order UnLearning (SOUL), which extends the static, one-shot model update using influence unlearning to a dynamic, iterative unlearning process. Our extensive experiments show that SOUL consistently outperforms conventional first-order methods across various unlearning tasks, models, and metrics, indicating that second-order optimization offers an effective and broadly applicable solution for LLM unlearning. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/SOUL.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2024; v1 submitted 28 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
From PEFT to DEFT: Parameter Efficient Finetuning for Reducing Activation Density in Transformers
Authors:
Bharat Runwal,
Tejaswini Pedapati,
Pin-Yu Chen
Abstract:
Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have become the de facto starting point for fine-tuning on downstream tasks. However, as model sizes continue to increase, traditional fine-tuning of all the parameters becomes challenging. To address this, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods have gained popularity as a means to adapt PLMs effectively. In parallel, recent studies have revealed the prese…
▽ More
Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have become the de facto starting point for fine-tuning on downstream tasks. However, as model sizes continue to increase, traditional fine-tuning of all the parameters becomes challenging. To address this, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods have gained popularity as a means to adapt PLMs effectively. In parallel, recent studies have revealed the presence of activation sparsity within the intermediate outputs of the multilayer perceptron (MLP) blocks in transformers. Low activation density enables efficient model inference on sparsity-aware hardware. Building upon this insight, in this work, we propose a novel density loss that encourages higher activation sparsity (equivalently, lower activation density) in the pre-trained models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by utilizing mainstream PEFT techniques, including QLoRA, LoRA, Adapter, and Prompt/Prefix Tuning, to facilitate efficient model adaptation across diverse downstream tasks. Experiments show that our proposed method, \textbf{DEFT} (Density-Efficient Fine-Tuning), can consistently reduce activation density by up to \textbf{44.94\%} on RoBERTa$_\mathrm{Large}$ and by \textbf{53.19\%} (encoder density) and \textbf{90.60\%} (decoder density) on Flan-T5$_\mathrm{XXL}$ (\textbf{11B}) compared to PEFT, using GLUE and QA (SQuAD) benchmarks respectively. We also introduce \textbf{ADA-DEFT}, an adaptive variant of our DEFT approach, which achieves significant memory and runtime savings during inference. For instance, ADA-DEFT reduces runtime by \textbf{8.79\%}and memory usage by \textbf{17.46\%} in Flan-T5$_\mathrm{XL}$, and by \textbf{2.79\%} and \textbf{2.54\%} respectively in Flan-T5$_\mathrm{XXL}$. Additionally, we showcase that DEFT works complementarily with quantized and pruned models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2024; v1 submitted 2 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Uncovering the Hidden Cost of Model Compression
Authors:
Diganta Misra,
Muawiz Chaudhary,
Agam Goyal,
Bharat Runwal,
Pin Yu Chen
Abstract:
In an age dominated by resource-intensive foundation models, the ability to efficiently adapt to downstream tasks is crucial. Visual Prompting (VP), drawing inspiration from the prompting techniques employed in Large Language Models (LLMs), has emerged as a pivotal method for transfer learning in the realm of computer vision. As the importance of efficiency continues to rise, research into model c…
▽ More
In an age dominated by resource-intensive foundation models, the ability to efficiently adapt to downstream tasks is crucial. Visual Prompting (VP), drawing inspiration from the prompting techniques employed in Large Language Models (LLMs), has emerged as a pivotal method for transfer learning in the realm of computer vision. As the importance of efficiency continues to rise, research into model compression has become indispensable in alleviating the computational burdens associated with training and deploying over-parameterized neural networks. A primary objective in model compression is to develop sparse and/or quantized models capable of matching or even surpassing the performance of their over-parameterized, full-precision counterparts. Although previous studies have explored the effects of model compression on transfer learning, its impact on visual prompting-based transfer remains unclear. This study aims to bridge this gap, shedding light on the fact that model compression detrimentally impacts the performance of visual prompting-based transfer, particularly evident in scenarios with low data volume. Furthermore, our findings underscore the adverse influence of sparsity on the calibration of downstream visual-prompted models. However, intriguingly, we also illustrate that such negative effects on calibration are not present when models are compressed via quantization. This empirical investigation underscores the need for a nuanced understanding beyond mere accuracy in sparse and quantized settings, thereby paving the way for further exploration in Visual Prompting techniques tailored for sparse and quantized models.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 28 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Robust Graph Neural Networks using Weighted Graph Laplacian
Authors:
Bharat Runwal,
Vivek,
Sandeep Kumar
Abstract:
Graph neural network (GNN) is achieving remarkable performances in a variety of application domains. However, GNN is vulnerable to noise and adversarial attacks in input data. Making GNN robust against noises and adversarial attacks is an important problem. The existing defense methods for GNNs are computationally demanding and are not scalable. In this paper, we propose a generic framework for ro…
▽ More
Graph neural network (GNN) is achieving remarkable performances in a variety of application domains. However, GNN is vulnerable to noise and adversarial attacks in input data. Making GNN robust against noises and adversarial attacks is an important problem. The existing defense methods for GNNs are computationally demanding and are not scalable. In this paper, we propose a generic framework for robustifying GNN known as Weighted Laplacian GNN (RWL-GNN). The method combines Weighted Graph Laplacian learning with the GNN implementation. The proposed method benefits from the positive semi-definiteness property of Laplacian matrix, feature smoothness, and latent features via formulating a unified optimization framework, which ensures the adversarial/noisy edges are discarded and connections in the graph are appropriately weighted. For demonstration, the experiments are conducted with Graph convolutional neural network(GCNN) architecture, however, the proposed framework is easily amenable to any existing GNN architecture. The simulation results with benchmark dataset establish the efficacy of the proposed method, both in accuracy and computational efficiency. Code can be accessed at https://github.com/Bharat-Runwal/RWL-GNN.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
APP: Anytime Progressive Pruning
Authors:
Diganta Misra,
Bharat Runwal,
Tianlong Chen,
Zhangyang Wang,
Irina Rish
Abstract:
With the latest advances in deep learning, there has been a lot of focus on the online learning paradigm due to its relevance in practical settings. Although many methods have been investigated for optimal learning settings in scenarios where the data stream is continuous over time, sparse networks training in such settings have often been overlooked. In this paper, we explore the problem of train…
▽ More
With the latest advances in deep learning, there has been a lot of focus on the online learning paradigm due to its relevance in practical settings. Although many methods have been investigated for optimal learning settings in scenarios where the data stream is continuous over time, sparse networks training in such settings have often been overlooked. In this paper, we explore the problem of training a neural network with a target sparsity in a particular case of online learning: the anytime learning at macroscale paradigm (ALMA). We propose a novel way of progressive pruning, referred to as \textit{Anytime Progressive Pruning} (APP); the proposed approach significantly outperforms the baseline dense and Anytime OSP models across multiple architectures and datasets under short, moderate, and long-sequence training. Our method, for example, shows an improvement in accuracy of $\approx 7\%$ and a reduction in the generalization gap by $\approx 22\%$, while being $\approx 1/3$ rd the size of the dense baseline model in few-shot restricted imagenet training. We further observe interesting nonmonotonic transitions in the generalization gap in the high number of megabatches-based ALMA. The code and experiment dashboards can be accessed at \url{https://github.com/landskape-ai/Progressive-Pruning} and \url{https://wandb.ai/landskape/APP}, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2022; v1 submitted 4 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
