The correlation between the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster separation and the neutron S-factor in Be12superscriptBe12{}^{12}\text{Be}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Be

Zhilian Cai School of Science, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China ā€ƒā€ƒ Qing Zhao Corresponding author [email protected] School of Science, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China ā€ƒā€ƒ Zaihong Yang School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China ā€ƒā€ƒ Masaaki Kimura Nuclear Reaction Data Centre (JCPRG), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan Department of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan RIKEN Nishina Center, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan ā€ƒā€ƒ Bo Zhou Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China Shanghai Research Center for Theoretical Nuclear Physics, NSFC and Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China ā€ƒā€ƒ Seung-heon Shin Department of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
Abstract

The reduced width amplitudes (RWA) and the spectroscopic factor (S-factor) of Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster and valence neutron in 12Be are calculated by the generator coordinates method (GCM) with the cluster model. By fixing the distance between the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clustersā€™ generated coordinates, we make a theoretical experiment to analyze the relationship between the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clustering separation and the orbital occupation of the valence neutron in 12Be. The analysis of the results shows that the percentage of the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ orbital occupation in 12Be is positively related to the clustering separation.

I Introduction

Cluster structure is one of the most interesting phenomena in nuclear physicsĀ Descouvemont (1989); von OertzenĀ etĀ al. (2006); Hisashi (1991); Hoyle (1954); YeĀ etĀ al. (2025); WeiĀ etĀ al. (2024). The study of clustering in light nuclei is related to various theoretical and experimental aspects, such as cluster resonance statesĀ LiuĀ etĀ al. (2020); ChenĀ etĀ al. (2023); MaĀ etĀ al. (2021), molecular statesĀ LiĀ etĀ al. (2023), inhomogeneous nuclear matterĀ TanakaĀ etĀ al. (2021); OertelĀ etĀ al. (2017), etc. A combined theoretical and experimental study will offer new insights into the clustering effect on the observed phenomenaĀ TanakaĀ etĀ al. (2021). Thus, finding the direct relationship between the cluster structure and other observables is one of the most important works in theoretical study.

Be isotopes are good candidates for studying the cluster structure since 8-12Be usually can be treated as two Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters coupled with several valence neutrons. In the general view from the molecular orbit model, the valence neutrons in these isotopes should occupy the Ļ€šœ‹\piitalic_Ļ€-orbit with negative parity. However, it has been known that the last two neutrons in the ground state (0+) of 12Be dominantly occupy the positive-parity ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit, which is essentially connected to the breaking of the N=8š‘8N=8italic_N = 8 magic numberĀ PainĀ etĀ al. (2006); KanungoĀ etĀ al. (2010); ChenĀ etĀ al. (2018). This phenomenon was also attributed to the deformation of the nucleus, which leads to a change in the order of single-particle orbitals and consequently the shell structureĀ Kanada-Enā€™yoĀ etĀ al. (2012); ItoĀ etĀ al. (2012); MacchiavelliĀ etĀ al. (2018). From the perspective of the cluster model, 12Be is described as two Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters and four valence neutrons. As shown by Ito et al. using the generalized two-center cluster modelĀ ItoĀ etĀ al. (2012), molecular orbitals of the valence neutrons are highly sensitive to the configuration of the two alpha clusters. Therefore, the orbital inversion of the valence neutrons should also be closely related to the two-alpha cluster structure. It is thus very interesting to investigate the relationship between the cluster structure and the orbital occupation of the valence neutrons in 12Be using microscopic theoretical models.

In our previous workĀ ZhaoĀ etĀ al. (2022), we investigate the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster structure in 10Be and 12Be with the microscopic model calculations. The reduced width amplitude (RWA) and the spectroscopic factor (S-factor) of the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster are calculated and analyzed to study the asymptotic behavior and the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī± formation probability. The RWA is treated as the wave function of a substructure in the parent nucleus, which is a quantitative measure of the cluster structure and can be experimentally probed. The S-factor of the can also be experimentally extracted from the transfer reaction and the proton induced knock-out reactionĀ ChenĀ etĀ al. (2018); WakasaĀ etĀ al. (2017); YangĀ etĀ al. (2021); KubotaĀ etĀ al. (2020). Calculating these two quantities provides us a unique access to the relationship between the cluster structure and the valence neutronā€™s orbital occupation.

In this paper, we adopt the generator coordinates method (GCM) combined with the cluster model to calculate the wave functions of 12Be and 11Be. After fixing the relative distance of the generated coordinates between the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters in their wave functions manually, we then calculate the RWA and S-factor of the valence neutron in 12Be(g.s.). This is a kind of theoretical experiment that shows us the direct relationship between the clusters separation and the valence neutronā€™s orbital occupation.

This paper is structured as follows. In Section II, the GCM and the calculation formula of RWA and S-factor are briefly introduced. In Section III, we introduce the specific results of this work and the discussion of the results. We make the summary in the last section.

II Theoretical Framework

II.1 Hamiltonian and Wave Function

The Hamiltonian used for the calculation is

ā„‹ā„‹\displaystyle{\cal H}caligraphic_H =āˆ‘iAt^iāˆ’t^cā¢m+12ā¢āˆ‘iā¢jAv^Nā¢Nā¢(š’“iā¢j)absentsuperscriptsubscriptš‘–š“subscript^š‘”š‘–subscript^š‘”š‘š‘š12superscriptsubscriptš‘–š‘—š“subscript^š‘£š‘š‘subscriptš’“š‘–š‘—\displaystyle=\sum_{i}^{A}\hat{t}_{i}-\hat{t}_{cm}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij}^{A}% \hat{v}_{NN}(\boldsymbol{r}_{ij})= āˆ‘ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG āˆ‘ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (1)
+12ā¢āˆ‘iā¢jāˆˆprotonZv^Cā¢(š’“iā¢j)+12ā¢āˆ‘iā¢jAv^lā¢sā¢(š’“iā¢j),12superscriptsubscriptš‘–š‘—protonš‘subscript^š‘£š¶subscriptš’“š‘–š‘—12superscriptsubscriptš‘–š‘—š“subscript^š‘£š‘™š‘ subscriptš’“š‘–š‘—\displaystyle+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij\in\text{proton}}^{Z}\hat{v}_{C}(\boldsymbol{% r}_{ij})+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij}^{A}\hat{v}_{ls}(\boldsymbol{r}_{ij})~{},+ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG āˆ‘ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j āˆˆ proton end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG āˆ‘ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ,

where t^isubscript^š‘”š‘–\hat{t}_{i}over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and t^cā¢msubscript^š‘”š‘š‘š\hat{t}_{cm}over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represent the kinetic operators of the single-particle and the center of mass, respectively. v^Nā¢Nsubscript^š‘£š‘š‘\hat{v}_{NN}over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, v^Csubscript^š‘£š¶\hat{v}_{C}over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and v^lā¢ssubscript^š‘£š‘™š‘ \hat{v}_{ls}over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represent the effective nucleon-nucleon interaction, Coulomb interaction, and spin-orbit interaction, respectively. We use Volkov No.2222 interaction as the nucleon-nucleon interactionĀ Volkov (1965),

v^Nā¢Nā¢(š’“iā¢j)=subscript^š‘£š‘š‘subscriptš’“š‘–š‘—absent\displaystyle\hat{v}_{NN}(\boldsymbol{r}_{ij})=over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = (Wāˆ’Mā¢P^Ļƒā¢P^Ļ„+Bā¢P^Ļƒāˆ’Hā¢P^Ļƒ)š‘Šš‘€superscript^š‘ƒšœŽsuperscript^š‘ƒšœšµsuperscript^š‘ƒšœŽš»superscript^š‘ƒšœŽ\displaystyle(W-M\hat{P}^{\sigma}\hat{P}^{\tau}+B\hat{P}^{\sigma}-H\hat{P}^{% \sigma})( italic_W - italic_M over^ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļƒ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļ„ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_B over^ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļƒ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_H over^ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļƒ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) (2)
Ɨ[V1ā¢expā”(āˆ’š’“iā¢j2/c12)+V2ā¢expā”(āˆ’š’“iā¢j2/c22)].absentdelimited-[]subscriptš‘‰1superscriptsubscriptš’“š‘–š‘—2superscriptsubscriptš‘12subscriptš‘‰2superscriptsubscriptš’“š‘–š‘—2superscriptsubscriptš‘22\displaystyle\times\left[V_{1}\exp{(-\boldsymbol{r}_{ij}^{2}/c_{1}^{2}})+V_{2}% \exp{(-\boldsymbol{r}_{ij}^{2}/c_{2}^{2})}\right]~{}.Ɨ [ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp ( - bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp ( - bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] .

, and G3RS potential as the spin-orbit interactionĀ Tamagaki (1968); NagataĀ etĀ al. (1979),

v^lā¢sā¢(š’“iā¢j)=V0lā¢sā¢(eāˆ’Ī±1ā¢š’“iā¢j2āˆ’eāˆ’Ī±2ā¢š’“iā¢j2)ā¢š‘³ā‹…š‘ŗā¢P^31.subscript^š‘£š‘™š‘ subscriptš’“š‘–š‘—ā‹…superscriptsubscriptš‘‰0š‘™š‘ superscriptš‘’subscriptš›¼1subscriptsuperscriptš’“2š‘–š‘—superscriptš‘’subscriptš›¼2subscriptsuperscriptš’“2š‘–š‘—š‘³š‘ŗsubscript^š‘ƒ31\displaystyle\hat{v}_{ls}(\boldsymbol{r}_{ij})=V_{0}^{ls}(e^{-\alpha_{1}% \boldsymbol{r}^{2}_{ij}}-e^{-\alpha_{2}\boldsymbol{r}^{2}_{ij}})\boldsymbol{L}% \cdot\boldsymbol{S}\hat{P}_{31}~{}.over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_Ī± start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_Ī± start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_italic_L ā‹… bold_italic_S over^ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 31 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (3)

We adopt the interaction parameters as W=0.42š‘Š0.42W=0.42italic_W = 0.42, M=0.58š‘€0.58M=0.58italic_M = 0.58, B=0.125šµ0.125B=0.125italic_B = 0.125, H=0.125š»0.125H=0.125italic_H = 0.125, and V0lā¢s=2800superscriptsubscriptš‘‰0š‘™š‘ 2800V_{0}^{ls}=2800italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2800 MeV for it can reproduce the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbital occupation of the valence neutron in the ground state of 12BeĀ ZhaoĀ etĀ al. (2022). The other parameters are, V1=āˆ’60.65subscriptš‘‰160.65V_{1}=-60.65italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 60.65 MeV, V2=61.14subscriptš‘‰261.14V_{2}=61.14italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 61.14 MeV, c1=1.80subscriptš‘11.80c_{1}=1.80italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.80 fm, and c2=1.01subscriptš‘21.01c_{2}=1.01italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.01 fm for v^Nā¢Nsubscript^š‘£š‘š‘\hat{v}_{NN}over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Ī±1=5.0subscriptš›¼15.0\alpha_{1}=5.0italic_Ī± start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.0 fm-2, and Ī±2=5.0subscriptš›¼25.0\alpha_{2}=5.0italic_Ī± start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.0 fm-2 for v^lā¢ssubscript^š‘£š‘™š‘ \hat{v}_{ls}over^ start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

We use the generator coordinate method (GCM) combined with the cluster model to construct the wave function of the nucleus. The single-particle wave function is expressed as Gaussian form multiplied by the spin and isospin parts Ļ‡šœ’\chiitalic_Ļ‡, Ļ„šœ\tauitalic_Ļ„ as

Ļ†ā¢(š’“)=(2ā¢Ī½Ļ€)3/4ā¢expā”[āˆ’Ī½ā¢(š’“āˆ’š’›Ī½)2+12ā¢š’›2]ā¢Ļ‡ā¢Ļ„šœ‘š’“superscript2šœˆšœ‹34šœˆsuperscriptš’“š’›šœˆ212superscriptš’›2šœ’šœ\displaystyle\varphi(\boldsymbol{r})=(\frac{2\nu}{\pi})^{3/4}\exp{[-\nu(% \boldsymbol{r}-\frac{\boldsymbol{z}}{\sqrt{\nu}})^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\boldsymbol{z% }^{2}]}\chi\tauitalic_Ļ† ( bold_italic_r ) = ( divide start_ARG 2 italic_Ī½ end_ARG start_ARG italic_Ļ€ end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_exp [ - italic_Ī½ ( bold_italic_r - divide start_ARG bold_italic_z end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_Ī½ end_ARG end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG bold_italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] italic_Ļ‡ italic_Ļ„ (4)
Ļ‡=aā¢Ļ‡ā†‘+bā¢Ļ‡ā†“;Ļ„=proton or neutron.formulae-sequencešœ’š‘Žsubscriptšœ’ā†‘š‘subscriptšœ’ā†“šœproton or neutron\displaystyle\chi=a\chi_{\uparrow}+b\chi_{\downarrow}~{};~{}~{}\tau=\text{% proton or neutron}~{}.italic_Ļ‡ = italic_a italic_Ļ‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ā†‘ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_b italic_Ļ‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ā†“ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_Ļ„ = proton or neutron . (5)

The Gaussian width parameter is set to be Ī½=1/2ā¢b2šœˆ12superscriptš‘2\nu=1/2b^{2}italic_Ī½ = 1 / 2 italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT where b=1.46š‘1.46b=1.46italic_b = 1.46 fm by following the other worksFurumotoĀ etĀ al. (2018); ItagakiĀ etĀ al. (2003). The central of Gaussian is determined by the generate coordinate š’›š’›\boldsymbol{z}bold_italic_z, which is a complex vector. The real part of generate coordinate š‘¹=Reā¢(š’›)š‘¹Reš’›\boldsymbol{R}=\text{Re}(\boldsymbol{z})bold_italic_R = Re ( bold_italic_z ) represents the average spatial position of particle, while the imaginary part represents the average momentum.

The Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster wave function is constructed by the slater determinant with (0ā¢s)4superscript0š‘ 4(0s)^{4}( 0 italic_s ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT configuration as

Ī¦Ī±ā¢(š’›Ī±)=š’œā¢{Ļ†pā¢(š’›Ī±,ā†‘)ā¢Ļ†pā¢(š’›Ī±,ā†“)ā¢Ļ†nā¢(š’›Ī±,ā†‘)ā¢Ļ†nā¢(š’›Ī±,ā†“)},subscriptĪ¦š›¼subscriptš’›š›¼š’œsubscriptšœ‘š‘subscriptš’›š›¼ā†‘subscriptšœ‘š‘subscriptš’›š›¼ā†“subscriptšœ‘š‘›subscriptš’›š›¼ā†‘subscriptšœ‘š‘›subscriptš’›š›¼ā†“\displaystyle\Phi_{\alpha}(\boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha})={\cal A}\{\varphi_{p}(% \boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha},\uparrow)\varphi_{p}(\boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha},% \downarrow)\varphi_{n}(\boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha},\uparrow)\varphi_{n}(% \boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha},\downarrow)\}~{},roman_Ī¦ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = caligraphic_A { italic_Ļ† start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ā†‘ ) italic_Ļ† start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ā†“ ) italic_Ļ† start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ā†‘ ) italic_Ļ† start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ā†“ ) } , (6)

where the spatial coordinates of four particles are set to be the same š’›Ī±subscriptš’›š›¼\boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha}bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The basis wave functions for the system are composed of the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster and several valence nucleons with the slater determinant as

Ī¦ā¢(š’›Ī±,1,š’›Ī±,2ā¢ā€¦ā¢š’›1,š’›2ā¢ā€¦)=š’œā¢{Ī¦Ī±,1ā¢Ī¦Ī±,2ā¢ā€¦ā¢Ļ†1ā¢Ļ†2ā¢ā€¦}.Ī¦subscriptš’›š›¼1subscriptš’›š›¼2ā€¦subscriptš’›1subscriptš’›2ā€¦š’œsubscriptĪ¦š›¼1subscriptĪ¦š›¼2ā€¦subscriptšœ‘1subscriptšœ‘2ā€¦\displaystyle\Phi(\boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha,1},\boldsymbol{z}_{\alpha,2}...% \boldsymbol{z}_{1},\boldsymbol{z}_{2}...)={\cal A}\{\Phi_{\alpha,1}\Phi_{% \alpha,2}...\varphi_{1}\varphi_{2}...\}~{}.roman_Ī¦ ( bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ā€¦ bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ā€¦ ) = caligraphic_A { roman_Ī¦ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ī¦ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ā€¦ italic_Ļ† start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ļ† start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ā€¦ } . (7)

We then perform the angular-momentum projection and the parity projection for each basis wave function to restore the rotational symmetry and the parity.

Ī¦Mā¢KJā¢Ļ€=2ā¢J+18ā¢Ļ€2ā¢āˆ«š‘‘Ī©ā¢DMā¢KJā£āˆ—ā¢(Ī©)ā¢Rā¢(Ī©)ā¢P^Ļ€ā¢Ī¦.superscriptsubscriptĪ¦š‘€š¾š½šœ‹2š½18superscriptšœ‹2differential-dĪ©superscriptsubscriptš·š‘€š¾š½Ī©š‘…Ī©superscript^š‘ƒšœ‹Ī¦\displaystyle\Phi_{MK}^{J\pi}=\frac{2J+1}{8\pi^{2}}\int d\Omega D_{MK}^{J*}(% \Omega)R(\Omega)\hat{P}^{\pi}\Phi.roman_Ī¦ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J italic_Ļ€ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 2 italic_J + 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_Ļ€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG āˆ« italic_d roman_Ī© italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J āˆ— end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( roman_Ī© ) italic_R ( roman_Ī© ) over^ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļ€ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ī¦ . (8)

The total wave function is finally given as the superposition of the basis wave functions

ĪØMJĻ€=āˆ‘i,Kgiā¢Ī¦Mā¢K,iJĻ€.superscriptsubscriptĪØš‘€superscriptš½šœ‹subscriptš‘–š¾subscriptš‘”š‘–superscriptsubscriptĪ¦š‘€š¾š‘–superscriptš½šœ‹\displaystyle\Psi_{M}^{J^{\pi}}=\sum_{i,K}g_{i}\Phi_{MK,i}^{J^{\pi}}~{}.roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļ€ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = āˆ‘ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ī¦ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M italic_K , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ļ€ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (9)

We can obtain the coefficients gisubscriptš‘”š‘–g_{i}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the corresponding eigen-energy by solving the Hill-Wheeler equation.

II.2 Reduced Width Amplitude (RWA)

The reduced width amplitude (RWA) is defined as the overlapping integral between the wave functions of the parent nucleus ĪØĪØ\Psiroman_ĪØ and the residual nuclei with mass numbers A1subscriptš“1A_{1}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and A2subscriptš“2A_{2}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,

Yā¢(a)=aā¢A!(1+Ī“A1ā¢A2)ā¢A1!ā¢A2!ā¢āŸØĪ“ā¢(rāˆ’a)r2ā¢ĪØA1ā¢ĪØA2ā¢Ylā¢(r^)|ĪØāŸ©.š‘Œš‘Žš‘Žš“1subscriptš›æsubscriptš“1subscriptš“2subscriptš“1subscriptš“2inner-productš›æš‘Ÿš‘Žsuperscriptš‘Ÿ2subscriptĪØsubscriptš“1subscriptĪØsubscriptš“2subscriptš‘Œš‘™^š‘ŸĪØ\displaystyle Y(a)=a\sqrt{\frac{A!}{(1+\delta_{A_{1}A_{2}})A_{1}!A_{2}!}}\left% \langle\frac{\delta(r-a)}{r^{2}}\Psi_{A_{1}}\Psi_{A_{2}}Y_{l}(\hat{r})|\Psi% \right\rangle~{}.italic_Y ( italic_a ) = italic_a square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_A ! end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + italic_Ī“ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ! italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ! end_ARG end_ARG āŸØ divide start_ARG italic_Ī“ ( italic_r - italic_a ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over^ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) | roman_ĪØ āŸ© . (10)

ĪØA1subscriptĪØsubscriptš“1\Psi_{A_{1}}roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ĪØA2subscriptĪØsubscriptš“2\Psi_{A_{2}}roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the wave functions of two residual nuclei, where lš‘™litalic_l represents the relative angular momentum between them. The RWA can be regarded as the wave function of a substructure in the composed nucleus, whose number of nodes is determined by the quantum number of the residual and the composed nuclei. Thus, it can be direct indicative of valence nucleon orbital occupation in the wave function. This calculation can be done with the Laplace expansion methodĀ ChibaĀ andĀ Kimura (2017).

Meanwhile, we can calculate the overlap function for the valence nucleon without the single-particle wave function. It is defined with the wave functions of residual and parent nuclei,

Yā¢(a)=aā¢āŸØĪ“ā¢(rāˆ’a)ā¢ĪØAāˆ’1ā¢Ylā¢(r^)|a^ā¢(š’“)|ĪØAāŸ©,š‘Œš‘Žš‘Žquantum-operator-productš›æš‘Ÿš‘ŽsubscriptĪØš“1subscriptš‘Œš‘™^š‘Ÿ^š‘Žš’“subscriptĪØš“\displaystyle Y(a)=a\left\langle\delta(r-a)\Psi_{A-1}Y_{l}(\hat{r})|\hat{a}(% \bm{r})|\Psi_{A}\right\rangle~{},italic_Y ( italic_a ) = italic_a āŸØ italic_Ī“ ( italic_r - italic_a ) roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over^ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) | over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ( bold_italic_r ) | roman_ĪØ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT āŸ© , (11)

where a^ā¢(š’“)^š‘Žš’“\hat{a}(\bm{r})over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ( bold_italic_r ) is the annihilation operator for one nucleonĀ GaidarovĀ etĀ al. (1999). The overlap function has the same physical meaning as the RWA, but the way of counting the number of nodes is different.

The integral of the square of RWA or the overlap function indicates the possibility of finding the substructure in the nucleus, which is called as the spectroscopic factor (S-factor)

S=āˆ«0āˆžY2ā¢(r)ā¢š‘‘r.š‘†superscriptsubscript0superscriptš‘Œ2š‘Ÿdifferential-dš‘Ÿ\displaystyle S=\int_{0}^{\infty}Y^{2}(r)dr~{}.italic_S = āˆ« start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT āˆž end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) italic_d italic_r . (12)

In this work, we calculate the RWA for the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster in 12Be to confirm the orbital occupation of its valence nucleons. Meanwhile, we calculate the S-factor for the valence neutron with the overlap function between 11Be and 12Be, which reflects the relationship between the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster separation and the valence neutronā€™s orbital occupation. We will discuss it in detail in the next section.

III Theoretical Results

III.1 GCM calculation

We first calculate the wave functions of the 12Be, 11Be, 8He, and 4He with the GCM framework as introduced above. These wave functions will be used for the further calculations in this work. The energy results and corresponding Q-values are shown in TableĀ 1,

Table 1: The binding energies and the corresponding Q-values of 12Be, 11Be, 8He, and 4He. ā€œExpt.ā€ indicates the experimental data, which is referred from NNDC databaseĀ Laboratory (1994), ā€œCal.ā€ indicates the calculated results. ā€œQ-v(Exp/Cal)ā€ indicate the experimental/calculated Q-values from 12Be to 11Be and 8He + 4He, respectively. All the units are in MeV.
Expt. Q-v(Exp) Cal. Q-v(Cal)
12Be(0+superscript00^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) āˆ’68.6568.65-68.65- 68.65 āˆ’71.1471.14-71.14- 71.14
11Be(1/2+1superscript21/2^{+}1 / 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) āˆ’65.4865.48-65.48- 65.48 āˆ’3.173.17-3.17- 3.17 āˆ’70.5170.51-70.51- 70.51 āˆ’0.630.63-0.63- 0.63
4He(0+superscript00^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) āˆ’28.3028.30-28.30- 28.30 āˆ’27.5727.57-27.57- 27.57
8He(0+superscript00^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) āˆ’31.4031.40-31.40- 31.40 āˆ’8.958.95-8.95- 8.95 āˆ’34.6634.66-34.66- 34.66 āˆ’8.918.91-8.91- 8.91

where we can see that the binding energies are in good agreement with the experimental data. More importantly, the order of 12Be and 11Be is correct. Since we aim to deal with the virtual wave functions in further calculations, the absolute value of the binding energy is not as important as in other theoretical works, but the order of the states and the orbital occupation of the valence neutron are more critical.

The ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbital occupation in the ground state of 12Be is known as one of the examples of the breaking of the magic number N=8š‘8N=8italic_N = 8. As introduced in our previous work, the orbital occupation of the valence neutron in the calculated wave function of 12Be can be clearly confirmed from its Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-RWA result. The result is shown in Fig.Ā 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The calculated Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-RWA of 12Be to 8He + 4He channel. All the nuclei are in their ground state.

It can be seen that there are three nodes in the RWA, which indicates that the last two neutrons in the calculated wave function of 12Be are occupying ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-obit as in reality. Next, we can continue our further investigations based on the current wave functions.

III.2 Correlation between Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster separation and neutron S-factor

In this work, we define the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster separation with the spatial generate coordinates of clusters as |š‘¹Ī±,1āˆ’š‘¹Ī±,2|subscriptš‘¹š›¼1subscriptš‘¹š›¼2|\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha,1}-\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha,2}|| bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |, which represents the average distance of clusters. Since the GCM wave function is a superposition of many basis wave functions with different generated coordinates for the clusters, we modify and fix their coordinates to make their distance a constant. The way of fixing the distance is a manual work for each basis wave function. First, we find out the center of mass between two clusters š‘¹c=12ā¢(š‘¹Ī±,1+š‘¹Ī±,2)subscriptš‘¹š‘12subscriptš‘¹š›¼1subscriptš‘¹š›¼2\boldsymbol{R}_{c}=\frac{1}{2}(\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha,1}+\boldsymbol{R}_{% \alpha,2})bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Second, we modify two clustersā€™ spatial coordinates to š‘¹iā€²subscriptsuperscriptš‘¹ā€²š‘–\boldsymbol{R}^{\prime}_{i}bold_italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ā€² end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to make their relative distance become dš‘‘ditalic_d while keeping their center of mass and the relative direction unchanged. The relationship between š‘¹Ī±,iā€²subscriptsuperscriptš‘¹ā€²š›¼š‘–\boldsymbol{R}^{\prime}_{\alpha,i}bold_italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ā€² end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and š‘¹Ī±,isubscriptš‘¹š›¼š‘–\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha,i}bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is calculated as below.

š‘¹Ī±,iā€²=dā¢(š‘¹Ī±,iāˆ’š‘¹c)|š‘¹Ī±,1āˆ’š‘¹Ī±,2|+š‘¹c.subscriptsuperscriptš‘¹ā€²š›¼š‘–š‘‘subscriptš‘¹š›¼š‘–subscriptš‘¹š‘subscriptš‘¹š›¼1subscriptš‘¹š›¼2subscriptš‘¹š‘\displaystyle\boldsymbol{R}^{\prime}_{\alpha,i}=d\frac{(\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha% ,i}-\boldsymbol{R}_{c})}{|\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha,1}-\boldsymbol{R}_{\alpha,2}|% }+\boldsymbol{R}_{c}.bold_italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ā€² end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_d divide start_ARG ( bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG | bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Ī± , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | end_ARG + bold_italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (13)

Finally, we calculate the total wave function with these set of modified basis wave functions with GCM. A diagram of how to fix the distance between two clusters is shown in Fig.Ā 2.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The diagram of illustrating the specific operation of modifying the distance between two clusters. The solid sphere represents the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī± cluster in the initial basis wave function. The translucent sphere represents the location of the modified clusters. In this work, we adjusted the distance of clusters in 11Be and 12Be to d=1/1.5/2/2.5/3š‘‘11.522.53d=1/1.5/2/2.5/3italic_d = 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 2.5 / 3 fm.

In this work, we fix the cluster distance for 11Be and 12Be simultaneously. Therefore, the changing of the overlap function between them only reflects the feature of the valence neutron. As the comparison, we adjust the cluster distance as d=1/1.5/2/2.5/3š‘‘11.522.53d=1/1.5/2/2.5/3italic_d = 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 2.5 / 3 fm.

We still need to confirm that the orbital structure of the valence neutron is not fundamentally altered due to the changes in the generated coordinates of the two clusters. We calculate the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-RWAs for each fixed distance and show the results in Fig.Ā 3,

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-RWAs of the ground state of 12Be which has different clusters distance. The sub-figure shows the local enlargement.

where we can see the same number of nodes as the RWA with the original 12Be wave function. It indicates the unchanged orbital occupation of the valence neutron in these virtual wave functions. In addition to this, we can also see that the RWAs are shifted to the right along with the increase in the cluster distance, which follows the diagram of the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters in 12Be. The valence neutron in 11Be(1/2+1superscript21/2^{+}1 / 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) is must be in the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit because of the spin-orbit coupling, therefore we do not need to check it with the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-RWA.

After fixing the generated coordinatesā€™ distance between the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters, we calculate the overlap function between the wave functions of 11Be and 12Be. The overlap function represents the wave function of a single neutron in 12Be, which has a similar meaning as the RWA. Especially, because the cluster structure in these two nuclei are fixed to be the same, the overlap results only reflect the behavior of the valence neutron effected with difference cluster separation. The results with different Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster distances are shown in Fig.Ā 4.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The overlap function results between 11Be and 12Be at different Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī± clustering distances. The 11Be and 12Be are all in their ground state from the calculation.

From this figure, we can notice that the overlap function of the single-neutron is directed with the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clustering separation. Along with the increasing distance, the inner part of the single-neutron overlap function amplitude is enhanced and the outer part is suppressed. It follows the pictures of the Ļ€šœ‹\piitalic_Ļ€- and ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbitā€™s structures, that the Ļ€šœ‹\piitalic_Ļ€-orbit has one node and moves around the system, while the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit has two nodes so that has a distribution at the inner part. In the nucleus, the position of the clusters relates to the position of the nodes of the single-particle orbitals. The larger separation between two clusters in 12Be may gives more space to form the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit for the valence neutron. A diagram of the above analysis is shown in Fig.Ā 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: The diagram of the nuclear density for Ļ€šœ‹\piitalic_Ļ€-orbit and ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit.

Since the last neutron in 11Be has 100%percent100100\%100 % to occupy the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit, the S-factor between 11Be and 12Be with the same cluster separation directly indicates the percentage of the valence neutron in 12Be occupying the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit. We show the S-factor results along with the increasing of the distance in Fig.Ā 6.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The S-factors of the single-neutron in 12Be(g.s.) with different fixed clusters distance. The dashed line is the straight fitting line for the results.

In this figure, the S-factor shows a positive correlation with the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster separation, which is again consistent with our picture of the orbits. What is even more interesting is that we can clearly see a linear relationship between the S-factor and the distance of clustersā€™ generated coordinates. It suggests some simpler relationship between orbital occupation of valence neutron and cluster separation. This result may provide a new perspective to the experimental study of the nuclear orbital occupation and the cluster structure.

IV Summary

We first calculate the wave functions of the 12Be, 11Be, 8He, and 4He with the GCM framework and confirm the valence neutrons in the ground state of 12Be dominantly occupy the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit, in accordance with the well-known breaking of the N=8 shell closure. By fixing the spatial distance between two Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clustersā€™ generated coordinates in the wave functions of 12Be and 11Be manually, we calculate the corresponding overlap function and the S-factor of the valence neutrons in 12Be. The results corroborate the conjecture that the evolution of the neutron molecular orbitals is closely tied to the configuration of the two alpha clustersā€”namely, the increasing separation between two Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters can enhance the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbit occupation. Furthermore, our result reveals a linear positive correlation between the ĻƒšœŽ\sigmaitalic_Ļƒ-orbital occupation and the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters separation. Notably, both the two-Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-cluster structure and the neutron S-factor can be measured experimentally by using the proton-induced knockout reactionsĀ LiĀ etĀ al. (2023); YangĀ etĀ al. (2021). This intriguing correlation may thus be probed by incorporating the predicted RWA of Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-clusters and the overlap function of the valence neutrons from our theoretical calculations into the reaction theories.

While the linear correlation between the S-factor and the alpha-cluster separation appears promising, further work is needed to refine our theoretical calculations. One notable limitation lies in the reliance on the virtual wave functions of 12Be and 11Be in the current study, which inevitably deviates from reality. Additionally, there is some ambiguity in the definition of cluster separation. In this work, the Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī±-Ī±š›¼\alphaitalic_Ī± separation is determined using the generated coordinates of the clusters. However, these coordinates do not represent the physical positions of the clusters but rather the centers of their Gaussian wave packets. More accurately, they should be interpreted as the intrinsic average positions of the clusters, given the particle exchange between the clusters and the valence neutrons, which prevents localization of the clusters.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2023YFE0101500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Nos. 12305123, 12175042, 12275081, 12275082, 12275006], and JSPS KAKENHI [Grant Nos. 19K03859, 21H00113 and 22H01214]. Numerical calculations were performed in the Cluster-Computing Center of School of Science (C3S2) at Huzhou University.

References